❌

Normal view

Received — 9 August 2026 ⏭

Micron reportedly offers pennies on the dollar for Crucial RAM return, offers to reimburse original MSRP despite it being only 37% of market value — chipmaker later reverses course with a better solution

✇Tom's Hardware
9 August 2026 at 12:20

Micron used to produce some of the best RAM available to mainstream users through its Crucial brand. Despite the company's exit from the consumer market through its now-defunct Crucial brand, Micron had pledged to continue honoring warranties on existing Crucial products. A recent case on Reddit, however, highlights ongoing challenges with Micron's warranty process, where it reportedly offered a customer a ludicrous payout for an RMA. Only after further communication did Micron provide an improved offer. Another user also chimed in with a similar story about an SSD return with Micron. We have reached out to Micron for comment.

Crucial/Micron is refusing lifetime warranties after closing consumer ops—offering 17% of market value and keeping working hardware
 from r/pcmasterrace

Redditor Key_Tailor6948, who shared the email exchange with Tom's Hardware, recently shared their RMA experience with Micron's warranty process after encountering a failing memory module from a 48GB (2x24GB) DDR5 memory kit. While the Redditor did not specify the exact model of the memory kit, Crucial used to sell two such kits in this capacity: the Crucial Pro DDR5-6000 C48 and the Crucial Pro DDR5-5600 C46. The last known pricing for the memory kits was $489.99 and $459.99, respectively, during the memory shortage.

According to the Redditor, Micron allegedly said in an email that the company is no longer offering replacement products for warranty claims. Instead, Micron purportedly stated it would provide a refund based on the original purchase price, including taxes where applicable. However, the proposed refund amount was $241.86.

The major issue at hand is that the reimbursement Micron offered was based on the cost of the 48GB memory kit purchased before the recent memory shortage and the resulting price hikes. Nowadays, the most affordable 48GB DDR5 memory kit available on the market, such as a DDR5-6400 C32 one, which is faster than Micron’s discontinued offerings, starts at a staggering $649.99. The refund Micron proposed amounts to just 37% of the current market value for a somewhat comparable product. The Redditor's math about being 17% of market value and estimating similar-capacity memory kits going for “roughly $1,400" is a bit off based on verifiable pricing, but the proposed payment was still well short of current market value.

Beyond the disappointment over the low reimbursement, the Redditor expressed frustration that they had to send back the entire 48GB memory kit, even though only one of the two modules was faulty. This meant parting with a memory module that was still fully functional. Unfortunately, this is a common industry practice. Most manufacturers require the return of the full memory kit for warranty claims. It is exceedingly rare for companies to allow returns or replacements of only a single memory module from a multi-module kit, regardless of whether the other module is working perfectly. (EDIT 8/11/2026 : Micron's warranty states that it will either replace a product under warranty or refund the current market value of the product or the amount of the original purchase cost, whichever is lower. Therefore, Micron's offer is within the bounds of its warranty.)

The Redditor was also not happy about covering the shipping costs to return the defective memory module. This is another policy that varies widely among brands: some manufacturers cover all shipping fees, others split the cost, so you cannot really single out Micron in that aspect.

It would seem that Micron subsequently offered a more favorable resolution. The company agreed to send the user three Crucial Pro DDR5-6400 C32 16GB (CP16G64C32U5B) memory modules as a replacement. This solution matches the original capacity of 48GB and also delivers better performance than the user's original memory kit. The user accepted the offer.

Meanwhile, Crucial SSD owners are seemingly experiencing similar RMA practices from Micron. A Reddit user named LeanaIsTheBest highlighted in the same thread that Micron is allegedly refusing to provide direct replacements for a failing 4TB SSD. Instead, the company ostensibly offered a gift card equivalent to the original purchase price of the 4TB SSD as compensation. However, the company provided an alternate option to receive the same amount in cash through PayPal or Venmo, with the condition that the user pays the 6% transaction fee.

Micron wound down its consumer business back in December 2025. It is reasonable to think the chipmaker has reshaped its manufacturing factories to cater to more profitable markets, such as data centers and the AI sector. Micron probably is not maintaining inventory or production lines for consumer products, so direct replacements are unlikely. For a company that reported revenue of $41.46 billion in its last earnings call, it isn't a great look for Micron to not reimburse the replacement cost for loyal customers who have purchased its Crucial products.

China's memory-making champion smashes DDR5-8800 barrier on AMD platform — CXMT chips close the gap with SK hynix

✇Tom's Hardware
8 August 2026 at 13:35

The best RAM on the market generally utilizes integrated circuits (ICs) from industry giants such as SK hynix, Samsung, or Micron. Recently, however, Chinese chipmaker ChangXin Memory Technologies (CXMT) has emerged as a strong competitor amid the ongoing global memory shortage. In Colorful's latest overclocking exhibition, CXMT's ICs achieved speeds up to DDR5-8800 on AMD's X870E platform, keeping pace with the best overclocking ICs, such as SK hynix's A-die and M-die.

Many often regard CXMT as an underdog in the memory industry, particularly when compared to the "Big Three." Founded only a decade ago, the ambitious Chinese chipmaker eventually became China's largest domestic memory manufacturer and is now the fourth-largest memory maker globally.

The recent memory shortage has accelerated CXMT’s rise to fame. The chipmaker has been silently gaining ground in the memory market. Its momentum has been especially evident in the DDR5 segment despite the company having only unveiled its first DDR5 ICs in November 2025. Many top Chinese memory brands, including Asgard, Colorful, Gloway, and KingBank, are widely using CXMT ICs, and even Corsair has done so to a certain extent.

Colorful showed off an incredible overclock with its iGame Shadow II DDR5-6000 C34 memory kits, pushing both the 32GB (2x16GB) and 48GB (2x24GB) configurations far beyond their rated speeds. These kits reached DDR5-8812 and DDR5-8817, respectively, on Colorful's iGame X870E Vulcan W OC motherboard. Unfortunately, the screenshots provided by Colorful were too blurry to discern detailed specifications such as memory timings or DRAM voltage. For context, some high-end DDR5-8800 memory kits typically operate at timings around 42-55-55-140 with a voltage of 1.45V.

colorful igame shadow ii 16x2 kit (cxmt 2gb dies) reached 8800mhz mt100% on colorful igame x870e vulcan w oc (2dimm).reaching 8800 for 16x2 is very impressive and much harder to achieve compared to 24x2. based on the pattern we see with hynix dies, for example in z890 qvl, you… https://t.co/XzcS7SaJjV pic.twitter.com/g4aaQ3Q9SgAugust 6, 2026

The noteworthy aspect is that Colorful achieved the overclocking feat on 16GB memory modules. Most, if not all, DDR5-8600 and faster memory kits currently on the market come with 24GB memory modules. The reason is that many use SK hynix’s 24Gb (3GB) M-die ICs, produced on the chipmaker's advanced 1a-nm (~14nm) process node with Extreme Ultraviolet (EUV) lithography. These M-die ICs are the go-to choice for memory vendors thanks to their superior density, power efficiency, and ability to scale to higher frequencies.

In comparison, CXMT’s accomplishments are notable when considering the technological challenges. Due to U.S. export restrictions on China, CXMT does not have access to cutting-edge EUV equipment, so its 16nm node, which it uses for DDR5 ICs, leverages Deep Ultraviolet (DUV) machines instead. CXMT’s 16nm process is roughly in the same alley as the 1z nm (~14–15nm) nodes previously used by the Big Three, so CXMT is easily a few years behind the top-tier process nodes.

The reality is that CXMT will have to make do with what it has. The chipmaker is already developing a 1a-nm node but on DUV. It is far from prime time, though.

In addition to seeing CXMT ICs in mainstream memory kits, companies such as HP, Asus, and Acer have already started selling consumer devices, such as laptops or desktops with CXMT memory. Even Apple reportedly wants to buy memory chips from CXMT.

CXMT recently went public via IPO and saw its stock price skyrocket by 466%, raising over $8.6 billion. Without access to EUV machinery, CXMT will focus primarily on memory production and is rapidly building factories across China. The ambitious Chinese chipmaker hopes to steal 30% of the market share from the Big Three by 2030. It is just a matter of time before we start seeing CXMT ICs in all the prominent consumer memory brands.

Scientist says RAM pricing has risen to normalized 2007 levels, AI shortage undid 20 years of progress in a matter of months — memory prices had been falling exponentially for decades

✇Tom's Hardware
By: editors@tomshardware.com (Jowi Morales)
7 August 2026 at 17:58

Software performance expert, scientist, and GitHub developer Daniel Lemire compared historical computer memory prices and showed that decades of falling prices were undone in just a matter of months because of the massive demand for HBM. According to his X post, this event is a historical anomaly, and he cannot think of an instance where technology hardware prices reverted to levels from decades before.

On a historical basis, computer memory has been falling at an exponential rate for decades. But we just undid about 20 years of progress. RAM on a per unit basis is about as expensive as it was in 2007.To my knowledge, it is an historical anomaly. I cannot recall a similar… pic.twitter.com/UH6LgZ1fc4August 5, 2026

“RAM on a per unit basis is about as expensive as it was in 2007,” Lemire said. He also added, “I do not think anyone can predict what will happen, but I am guessing that we either find a way to build AI systems without so much memory, or we find really clever ways to make much more memory much faster.”

We also checked third-party data compiled and maintained by David Shim for the Stanford DAM Project. The latest price for DDR5 memory sits between $13.28 and $11.41 per GB — the last time RAM hit this price was in 2008, when the price for DDR2 hovered by $15 and 11.00 per GB. These are based on nominal USD values, though. If we take 2024 inflation into account, the current amount for DD5 is between $12.74 and $10.94 per GB, which was last achieved in 2011, when DDR3 prices were at $11.85 per GB.

memory pricing history

(Image credit: Stanford)

Technological advances, especially in manufacturing and miniaturization, meant that tech became cheaper over time. This has been true ever since the first general-purpose digital computer was created 80 years ago. ENIAC cost the government $400,000 in 1946, meaning it would probably cost around $6,850,297.44 today. However, its computing power equaled roughly 5,000 additions per second — by comparison, one of the cheapest smartphones you can get today, the Moto G Play, is on sale for $99.99. This smartphone is powered by a Snapdragon 680 processor with AI performance of 3.3 TOPS — that is 3.3 trillion operations per second. We can’t really compare the ENIAC to a modern processor, but it at least shows us the scale by which technology has advanced, and prices have dropped.

The massive increase in memory prices in recent times wasn’t caused by technological regression or a bottleneck in supply — instead, it’s the massive demand for HBM driven by the AI race. “The memory output is increasing by around 20% per year. Now, normally, that would be fantastically fast and amazing for any large, mature industry, but ask yourself, ‘Is the demand increasing by 20% a year?” Elon Musk said during the last SpaceX earnings call. “No, the demand is increasing by 200% a year, maybe higher.”

Other experts and industry leaders agree with Musk. The chairman of the SK Group, the holding company that owns memory chip manufacturer SK hynix, said that RAM prices are “abnormally high,” and that the industry must take steps to increase supply and lower prices. Even RAM that uses chips from Chinese manufacturer CXMT, which some people look to as a cheaper alternative, generally tracked the prices of modules that use chips from the big three (Micron, Samsung, and SK hynix).

Aside from computers, other industries are already being affected by the shortage, including graphics cards, smartphones, gaming consoles, and even automobiles. We do not know how long the current memory crisis will last, but the situation is unsustainable and “something has to give.” The scary thing is that nobody knows what would happen if and when that time comes.

New Mexico court orders Meta to pay $567m over harms to children’s mental health

✇The Guardian - Technology
By: Uwa Ede-Osifo and agencies
7 August 2026 at 03:24

Ruling comes as part of second phase of landmark trial that found social media company enabled harm against users

A New Mexico court has ordered Meta, the parent company of Facebook, to pay $567m into a fund aimed at redressing adverse mental health impacts from the social media giant’s platforms.

The Thursday ruling comes as a part of the second phase of a landmark trial the social media giant lost in March. At the time, a jury found that the company knowingly harmed children’s mental health and concealed what it knew about child sexual exploitation on its platforms, and imposed the maximum penalty: a $375m fine.

Continue reading...

© Photograph: Jill Connelly/Getty Images

© Photograph: Jill Connelly/Getty Images

© Photograph: Jill Connelly/Getty Images

China’s CXMT rejects Apple’s price-cut demands for DRAM, boosting Samsung and SK Hynix’s pricing power amid global shortage

✇MacDailyNews
By: MacDailyNews
6 August 2026 at 19:00

CXMT

In a striking reversal of traditional supply-chain dynamics, China’s ChangXin Memory Technologies (CXMT) has rebuffed Apple’s requests for lower prices on mobile DRAM, according to industry reports. The move underscores a severe shortage in general-purpose memory chips and hands greater negotiation leverage to South Korea’s Samsung Electronics and SK Hynix.

Apple had been exploring CXMT as a potential new supplier of LPDDR5X and other mobile DRAM for upcoming iPhones and smart devices, aiming to ease manufacturing cost pressures amid soaring memory prices. Sources indicate the iPhone maker sought further price reductions during negotiations. CXMT refused, instead holding firm at levels matching or even exceeding those charged by Samsung and SK Hynix.

The Chinese manufacturer’s bold stance stems from robust domestic demand. Companies such as Huawei and Xiaomi have locked in large volumes of CXMT’s DRAM through high-priced, long-term contracts. This push for supply-chain self-reliance has been intensified by ongoing U.S. semiconductor restrictions on China. With strong local orders secured, CXMT has little incentive to accommodate Apple’s stricter quality requirements or discount demands.

The episode highlights a broader market shift. Major memory producers have redirected significant wafer capacity toward high-bandwidth memory (HBM) to meet surging demand from AI servers and accelerators. This has sharply reduced output of conventional DRAM products like DDR5 and LPDDR5X, triggering a pronounced shortage—sometimes called “memflation” — and rapid price increases across the sector.Big tech firms that once used Chinese low-cost alternatives as leverage in annual pricing talks with primary suppliers now find that strategy ineffective. The low-cost “bypass” route has effectively closed, transferring pricing power from device makers to memory manufacturers.

For Samsung and SK Hynix, the developments create a favorable cycle. CXMT’s absorption of substantial Chinese commodity DRAM demand relieves the Korean firms of pressure to supply lower-margin general-purpose chips. They can instead prioritize higher-value AI memory products, including HBM4, LPCAMM2, and enterprise SSDs. Industry observers note that this positions the Korean companies with stronger control over global pricing in negotiations with major customers in the second half of the year.

One semiconductor industry source described the situation as unusual: CXMT is effectively supporting a floor under general DRAM prices while Samsung and SK Hynix consolidate leadership in premium AI memory. As a result, the Korean firms’ operating margins and market influence are expected to strengthen further.

Earlier this year, Apple had lobbied the U.S. government for clearer approval to source from CXMT, which appears on a Pentagon list of companies with alleged Chinese military ties. Memory cost pressures had already prompted Apple to raise prices on some Mac and iPad models. The latest reports suggest any potential deal with CXMT would not deliver the hoped-for cost savings.

MacDailyNews Take: The memory shortage is widely expected to persist well into 2027 and possibly beyond, as new fab capacity takes years to come online and AI-related demand continues to outpace supply growth. In this environment, the balance of power in the DRAM market has tilted decisively toward suppliers, particularly those focused on advanced, high-margin products.

‎
Please help support MacDailyNews — and enjoy subscriber-only articles, comments, chat, and more — by subscribing to our Substack: macdailynews.substack.com. Thank you!

Support MacDailyNews at no extra cost to you by using this link to shop at Amazon.

The post China’s CXMT rejects Apple’s price-cut demands for DRAM, boosting Samsung and SK Hynix’s pricing power amid global shortage appeared first on MacDailyNews.

I Am Artemis: Tom Percy

✇NASA
By: Lee Mohon
6 August 2026 at 17:35
3 Min Read

I Am Artemis: Tom Percy

Tom Percy, manager of systems engineering and integration for NASA’s Human Landing Systems Program, stands in front of an Apollo Program lander exhibit at the U.S. Space and Rocket Center in Huntsville near NASA’s Marshall Space Flight Center.

As NASA sets its sights on long-term exploration of the Moon and Mars, the agency is increasing the cadence of its Artemis missions. Helping bring these plans to fruition is Tom Percy, manager of systems engineering and integration for NASA’s Human Landing System Program.

Tom Percy, manager of systems engineering and integration for NASA’s Human Landing Systems Program, stands in front of an Apollo Program lander exhibit at the U.S. Space and Rocket Center in Huntsville near NASA’s Marshall Space Flight Center.
Tom Percy, manager of systems engineering and integration for NASA’s Human Landing Systems Program, stands in front of an Apollo Program lander exhibit at the U.S. Space and Rocket Center in Huntsville near NASA’s Marshall Space Flight Center.
NASA/Charles Beason

Percy serves as a focal point in working with providers SpaceX and Blue Origin to accelerate and streamline systems designs, manufacturing, testing, and certification. He ensures the crewed landers that SpaceX and Blue Origin are developing for Artemis are designed, built, tested, and will operate with other NASA exploration assets safely and effectively.

“You might say that all human landing system integration work lands on my desk. And with the rest of my talented, hard-working systems engineering and integration team, we’re working to make it all happen,” Percy said.

A native of North Easton, Massachusetts, Percy earned a bachelor’s degree in mechanical engineering from the Rochester Institute of Technology in Rochester, New York, where he first got hands-on experience working on designs that could be applied to NASA’s sustainable lunar architecture.

“As an undergrad, I served as president of the Rochester Institute of Technology’s chapter of the American Society of Mechanical Engineers. To get some real-world engineering experience, we decided to participate in the Great Moonbuggy Race,” Percy said. “Now called the Human Exploration Rover Challenge, the competition is held annually at NASA’s Marshall Space Flight Center in Huntsville, Alabama.

“At the time, I had never heard of Marshall Space Flight Center,” said Percy. “But our student team designed and built a rover and traveled to Huntsville for the race. That’s when I learned about some of the projects in Marshall’s diverse portfolio that the center works for NASA. And that’s when I began planning to make my way to NASA Marshall for my career.”

Percy chose to move south and earn a master’s degree in aerospace engineering from the Georgia Institute of Technology in Atlanta. His research in the advanced propulsion lab and courses in space systems design culminated in a spacecraft design course and the chance to work directly with engineers at Marshall.

Since landing at Marshall in 2003, Percy has been involved in evaluating transportation architecture options for human deep space exploration, including missions to land astronauts on the Moon and Mars. He also has expertise in space transportation, including advanced propulsion technology development; trajectory analysis; and spacecraft and mission concept development. Percy earned a doctorate in aerospace systems engineering from the University of Alabama in Huntsville.

The range of experience comes together in his current role as manager of human landing systems engineering and integration.

“The world watched the amazing success of Artemis II. NASA and our commercial providers are looking forward to flying again soon and executing increasingly complex Artemis missions,” Percy said.

Through the Artemis program, NASA will send astronauts on increasingly complex missions to explore more of the Moon for scientific discovery, economic benefits, establish an enduring human presence on the lunar surface, and to build on our foundation for the first crewed missions to Mars.

To learn more about the Artemis program, visit:

https://www.nasa.gov/artemis

About the Author

Beverly Perry

Communications Strategist

Share

Details

Last Updated
Aug 06, 2026
Editor
Lee Mohon
Contact
Keep Exploring

Discover More Topics From NASA

$1 billion of iPhone 18 Pro chips 'on the shelves awaiting packaging' due to DRAM shortages — memory shortages reportedly put a wrinkle in Apple's launch plans

✇Tom's Hardware
6 August 2026 at 15:52

Apple reportedly has around $1 billion in "processor wafers on the shelves awaiting packaging" amid ongoing memory shortages, putting pressure on the firm as it nears the launch of the iPhone 18. Tim Culpan of Culpium says Apple is "scrambling" for memory supply ahead of release, working with suppliers to get memory ready so it can finish packaging the A20 Pro and C2 chips that are reportedly inside the iPhone 18 lineup.

It's an interesting peek behind the curtain of the current supply chain limitations, which reach beyond simply DRAM chips. With fully-integrated SoCs across both desktop and mobile, Apple is uniquely vulnerable to supply chain limitations, not only in DRAM supply, but also in packaging capacity to bring together DRAM chips with processor wafers.

According to Culpan, Apple primarily sources DRAM from Micron, with smaller engagements from SK Hynix and Samsung. Micron (along with the other major memory players) has reportedly sold capacity for DRAM and HBM through 2027. A flurry of long-term agreements (LTAs) have cropped up over the past several months, guaranteeing supply to certain companies for several years.

The A20 Pro is the first chip to use TSMC's N2 process, and it has been progressing well, with TSMC reportedly sitting on around $1 billion worth of Apple wafers awaiting packaging with DRAM. Packaging happens with TSMC's new Wafer-Level Multi-Chip Module (WMCM) process, according to Culpan, which is similar to the CoWoS packaging but for mobile parts.

Culpan reports that "Apple and its assemblers remain confident that they can meet initial demand," but DRAM shortages could put pressure on shipments past the initial launch. Apple reportedly plans to ship around 200 million iPhone 18 units across the lineup throughout the device's lifespan. The iPhone 17 range saw record shipments last year, surpassing 245 million devices shipped in 2025.

Apple is one of several companies reportedly looking to alternative suppliers for DRAM, namely China's CXMT. The Chinese memory supplier has become a hot topic in the halls of the U.S. government over the past several weeks, with Apple reportedly lobbying for clearance as the government weighs the option to ban CXMT.

Samsung debuts three next-generation memory technologies for AI data centers — zHBM, zNAND-O, and BV-NAND all rely on advanced wafer bonding technologies

✇Tom's Hardware
By: ashilov@gmail.com (Anton Shilov)
6 August 2026 at 14:11

This week, Samsung presented its vision for next-generation memory and storage solutions both for AI and general-purpose applications at the Future of Memory and Storage (FMS) 2026 conference. The company introduced zHBM, zNAND-O, and BV-NAND technologies at the event, and while they are aimed at very different applications, they share one common ingredient: they all rely on wafer bonding.

Here's a breakdown of each type of technology that the company announced.

  • zHBM: Samsung’s vision for custom HBM ultra-high-performance memory that will sit on top of logic dies.
  • zNAND-O: NAND memory that can be bonded atop a logic device to maximize bandwidth, reduce latency, and minimize power consumption.
  • BV-NAND (aka Samsung’s 10th Generation V-NAND): Samsung’s take on bonding NAND arrays atop all the circuitry needed to operate them. This is essentially next-generation 3D NAND technology that is used today by almost everyone, including Kioxia/Sandisk, SK Hynix, and YMTC (which was the first company to adopt such a method).

This article is a preview of the type of content that readers can expect from our subscription service, Tom's Hardware Premium. If you're interested in more technical content that spans across the hardware industry, subscribe for as little as $29 per year, or $7 per month.

Don’t miss out on this Tom’s Hardware Premium. Get a full year of access for just $29, or from $7 per month. Get daily news analysis, deep dives into specialist topics in the semiconductor industry, as well as access to Bench, the largest benchmarking database around.View Deal

zHBM: Placing HBM stack on top of logic

Around the time we first heard about HBM4's 2,048-bit interface, we read a 'semi-official' report that SK hynix and its partners were considering vertical integration of HBM4 stacks on top of logic chips. To a large degree, companies were considering installing these memory stacks on top of their processors as they doubted that it would be possible and feasible to use interposers to connect HBM4 stacks to AI accelerators. Over time, it turned out that integration of memory on top of logic is complicated when it comes to cooling, power delivery, and developing interposers that can handle a 2,048-bit memory interface. Samsung's zHBM appears to be a continuation of that effort.

Samsung

(Image credit: Samsung)

Samsung's zHBM concept places HBM directly on top of an AI accelerator instead of on its perimeter, which greatly reduces the distance data must travel between compute and memory. The company says this architecture can increase bandwidth and power efficiency and projects that it can provide 8x the 'performance of HBM5', while its advanced wafer bonding is expected to enable over 10x higher memory density, 3x better energy efficiency, and more than 50% lower thermal resistance than HBM5.

While Samsung's claims about the zHBM look incredibly impressive, they are vague. For example, when the company claims that a 'next-generation interface system incorporating zHBM' will deliver 'approximately eight times the performance of HBM5,' it never explicitly states whether this refers to memory bandwidth, actual application performance due to a combination of improvements over standard HBM, or something else. Had Samsung intended to compare raw bandwidth, it would likely have used more precise wording, such as '8x higher bandwidth.'

Instead, the general term 'performance' may have many meanings. The same applies to references of improved power efficiency, higher memory density, and lower thermal resistance compared to HBM5, a standard that has not been fully defined or ratified. To make matters even more imprecise, Samsung mentions thermal resistance, which depends on implementation rather than the standard. Finally, Samsung didn't reveal which die stacking/bonding technology it will use for zHBM.

In any case, Samsung says that zHBM will also support customer-specific designs and will enable custom IP to be integrated into the interconnect layer (which plays a role similar to the base die, though it is definitely not a base die per se) between the HBM stack and the AI processor, which essentially means that zHBM is not necessarily an industry-standard solution, so it might be implemented with additional perks.

For now, Samsung hasn't disclosed any timeframes for when it plans to offer its zHBM solutions. The only clue is that it compares it to HBM5, which is likely to see the light of day sometime in the late 2020s or early 2030s.

zNAND-O(on-device): Put storage close to compute

Samsung also unveiled zNAND-O, a high-performance NAND memory currently in development that will enable putting four or eight stacks of NAND devices on top of logic dies. zNAND-O(n) device is based on the company's V-NAND platform (or rather, BV-NAND) and is meant to combine high storage density with improved I/O performance and low latency.

Samsung

(Image credit: Samsung)

Samsung claims that the tech is suitable for edge AI systems running real-time, data-intensive inference workloads, though, of course, there are many other applications that can benefit from high-performance on-package storage.

Samsung

(Image credit: Samsung)

Since the technology is in development, Samsung hasn't shared much information about it, even keeping the schematics of how it plans to put zNAND-O layers on top of a logic under wraps. We can speculate that since Samsung mentions 'improved I/O performance and low-latency,' it may be planning to exploit both the inherently parallel architecture of NAND memory with a high-performance interface, though we will not try to dive into details for the sake of not making the discussion too speculative.

BV-NAND: Good old V-NAND gets a new treatment

With BV-NAND, Samsung is essentially introducing a new brand name for its next-generation 3D NAND that bonds the NAND array on top of the I/O and logic wafer. This, in turn, produces the layer itself using high-performance logic process technologies and enables higher I/O speeds.

Samsung

(Image credit: Samsung)

Samsung formally announced its 400-layer-class V-NAND (aka 10th Generation V-NAND) some time ago, and even disclosed that its areal density would be 28 Gb/mm2 with a maximum I/O speed reaching 5600 MT/s. This likely stipulates the usage of a pinout that is different from the 3D NAND packages used today. While the areal density of Samsung's 10th Gen TLC V-NAND is slightly lower when compared to that of Kioxia/Sandisk's BiCS10 TLC NAND, its maximum I/O speed is significantly higher, which perhaps justifies the new branding.

NAND Layer Counts

Samsung

Samsung

Sandisk/Kioxia

Sandisk/Kioxia

Kioxia/Sandisk

Micron

SK hynix

YMTC

YMTC

Generation

V10

V9

BiCS10

BiCS10

BiCS 8

Gen 9 (G9)

Gen 9

?

Xtacking 3.0/Gen 4

Layers

4xx-Layer

290-Layer (?)

332-Layer

332-Layer

218-Layer

276-Layer

321-Layer

232-Layer

232-Layer

Density

28 Gb mm^2

17 Gb mm^2

>37 Gb/mm^2

>29 Gb/mm^2

22.9 Gb mm^2 (?)

21.0 Gb mm^2

20 mm^2

>20 Gb mm^2

19.8 Gb mm^2

Architecture

TLC

TLC

QLC

TLC

QLC

TLC

TLC

TLC

QLC

Die Capacity

1 Tb

1 Tb

?

1 Tb

2 Tb

1 Tb

1 Tb

1 Tb

1 Tb

I/O Speed

Up to 5600 MT/s

Up to 3200 MT/s

Up to 4800 MT/s

Up to 4800 MT/s

Up to 3600 MT/s

Up to 3600 MT/s

?

?

?

Considering the fact that Samsung rarely sells its memory to third parties and prefers to market client SSDs itself, a new brand for memory can be a sales driver, even if actual high-end drive performance is limited by a PCIe 5.0 x4 interface rather than by 3D NAND memory I/O. Then again, the performance of mid-range PCIe Gen5 SSDs that rely on a quad-channel NAND controller depends on 3D NAND I/O today, so marketing them under a new flash memory brand is a certain way to attract attention and then sell decent performance.

Samsung's new brand strategy

As the new name of the FMS tradeshow implies, the announcements touch upon very distinct industry needs. In the case of Samsung, we are talking about high-performance data center-grade AI accelerators; applications that need storage with latency that is lower than ~50 – 60 µs of modern high-end PCIe SSDs, though we will see how it compares to Z-NAND, and essentially a new generation of conventional 3D NAND with a new brand.

Except for the 400-layer-class Samsung BV-NAND that is set to hit the market in the foreseeable future, the company's new tech, like zHBM and zNAND-O, is years away.

Telegram Temporarily Removed for CSAM

✇Michael Tsai
By: Michael Tsai
5 August 2026 at 22:10

Hartley Charlton (The Verge):

Apple briefly removed Telegram from the App Store on Monday night after a review found content that violated its guidelines against child sexual abuse material (CSAM), but restored the app a short while later, according to Reuters.

It seems like this was a symbolic gesture. Removing the app didn’t affect any of the customers who had already downloaded it. Probably none of them saw the image. And restoring the app doesn’t mean that it’s completely free from CSAM—probably none of the major platforms is. It just means that Telegram did the obvious thing after the violation was reported, which presumably they would have done, anyway.

Jeff Johnson:

They removed an entire app for ONE app user???

And before even contacting the developer? Telegram banning the account is what actually prevented users from potentially seeing the CSAM. Apple’s action seems like either a mistake or trying to send them a message.

I would note, by the way, that the Telegram app was apparently never removed from the Mac App Store. Which goes to show how little Apple cares about the Mac App Store.

Telegram:

I’m sure this stance will be applied equally to all other apps in the store, in the future right? @Apple

Pavel Durov (Telegram, MacRumors):

Because Telegram quickly removes illegal content from public groups using all kinds of moderation tools, the attacker had to resort to a technical trick. He inserted AI-modified illegal content by editing an old message in an active group chat. As a result the content was effectively hidden from the group’s members, preventing them from seeing/reporting it.

The attacker was a takedown extortionist: someone who demands ransom from group owners in exchange for not targeting their communities. These extortionists use automated accounts to plant illegal content in public groups and then report it directly to Apple, attempting to trigger the removal of legitimate communities whose owners refused to pay them.

[…]

Extortionists have found a way to manipulate Apple into overreacting. Apple removed Telegram from the App Store before contacting us. This creates a potential systemic risk for every mobile app that hosts user-generated content. If an app used by more than a billion people can be removed from the App Store without prior warning, any app can be.

Marcus Mendes:

During the time the app was unavailable, many speculated that the move was politically motivated, or perhaps in response to the recent discovery that Telegram has allegedly been using an obfuscated private UIKit API to animate its emoji picker.

It’s sad but kind of hilarious that both of these so disparate theories were considered possible. Durov really does have political enemies, and Apple really does seem to have it out for Telegram. But, also, using private API to animate emojis totally seems like something that Telegram would do and that Apple would overreact to.

Previously:

Update (2026-08-06): Matt Burgess (Hacker News):

Over the last nine months, Mark Zuckerberg’s Meta has run dozens of paid ads that include explicit AI-generated child sexual abuse material (CSAM) and images of minors alongside sexually suggestive statements, according to details of the ads shared with WIRED. The ads, which in some cases reached several thousand accounts, were targeted at people living in the United States, United Kingdom, and more than a dozen European countries.

This is much worse than what happened with Telegram, yet Apple didn’t overreact.

There’s also the Twitter/Grok case.

Previously:

Telegram CEO accuses ‘takedown extortionist’ of manipulating Apple into brief App Store removal

✇MacDailyNews
By: MacDailyNews
5 August 2026 at 19:00

Apple App Store

Apple briefly removed Telegram from its App Store late on Monday after detecting child sexual abuse material (CSAM) in a public group. The messaging app was restored within about 40 minutes once Telegram deleted the content and banned the responsible user. Telegram CEO Pavel Durov later described the incident as the work of a “takedown extortionist” who deliberately planted AI-modified illegal content to trigger the removal and pressure online communities.

According to Durov’s statement on X (see below), the attacker edited an old message in an active public group chat to insert the prohibited material. Because the edit was backdated, the content remained effectively invisible to ordinary group members, limiting their ability to report it through normal channels and helping it evade some of Telegram’s automated moderation tools. The perpetrator then reportedly flagged the material directly to Apple.

Durov characterized the actor as a takedown extortionist—someone who demands payment from group owners in exchange for not targeting their communities. These operators, he said, rely on automated accounts to seed illegal material in public groups and then report it to platform gatekeepers such as Apple in an effort to force the removal of legitimate communities whose administrators refuse to pay.

“From a practical standpoint, illegal pornographic content in Telegram’s public groups is not a systemic problem,” Durov wrote. “Our moderation is effective. The fact that attackers must resort to backdated, effectively invisible content and other technical tricks proves this.” He emphasized that Telegram routinely removes illegal material from public groups using a range of moderation tools.

Apple confirmed that a content review had identified CSAM that violated App Store guidelines. The company stated that Telegram “promptly removed the content and banned the user,” after which the app was returned to the store. Apple has not publicly addressed Durov’s claim that an extortionist manipulated the process. Durov noted that Apple pulled Telegram before contacting the company.

Durov framed the episode as a warning for other developers. “Extortionists have found a way to manipulate Apple into overreacting,” he said. “This creates a potential systemic risk for every mobile app that hosts user-generated content. If an app used by more than a billion people can be removed from the App Store without prior warning, any app can be.” He also cautioned that the tactics used by such coordinated reporting groups are evolving and that other platforms may be less prepared to identify and counter them.

The incident underscores ongoing tensions between large platforms that host user-generated content, the moderation challenges they face, and the policies of mobile app marketplaces that can unilaterally restrict distribution. Telegram continues to operate normally on iOS following the short-lived removal.

Pavel Durov via X:
‎

Last night Apple briefly removed Telegram from the AppStore because a user had planted illegal porn in a public chat.

Telegram was restored within hours. But I want to explain what happened — to warn other app developers and help protect online communities from similar attacks.

Because Telegram quickly removes illegal content from public groups using all kinds of moderation tools, the attacker had to resort to a technical trick. He inserted AI-modified illegal content by editing an old message in an active group chat. As a result the content was effectively hidden from the group’s members, preventing them from seeing/reporting it.

The attacker was a takedown extortionist: someone who demands ransom from group owners in exchange for not targeting their communities. These extortionists use automated accounts to plant illegal content in public groups and then report it directly to Apple, attempting to trigger the removal of legitimate communities whose owners refused to pay them.

From a practical standpoint, illegal pornographic content in Telegram’s public groups is not a systemic problem. Our moderation is effective. The fact that attackers must resort to backdated, effectively invisible content and other technical tricks proves this.

⚠ However, there are two important lessons here for app developers and online communities:

— Extortionists have found a way to manipulate Apple into overreacting. Apple removed Telegram from the App Store before contacting us. This creates a potential systemic risk for every mobile app that hosts user-generated content. If an app used by more than a billion people can be removed from the App Store without prior warning, any app can be.

— The tactics used by takedown extortionists are evolving, putting communities across social platforms at risk. Telegram has extensive experience identifying the tricks used by coordinated reporting gangs and protecting legitimate communities (even when doing so risks our own app being temporarily removed from the App Store). Other platforms may not be equally prepared.

Stay vigilant! ☝

‎
MacDailyNews Take: Apple’s App Store really is one of history’s most profitable cans of worms.

It’s an astonishing money machine: the broader App Store ecosystem facilitated over $1.4 trillion in developer billings and sales in 2025 alone. Physical goods and services (retail, food delivery, travel, etc.) made up the bulk (~$1.1 trillion), where Apple takes no commission. Digital goods and services accounted for about $149 billion, and in-app advertising another $151 billion. On the digital slice Apple typically charges 15–30%, generating many billions in high-margin revenue that helps power its Services business.

Yet the same walld garden that produces those results is a perpetual source of headaches. Apple’s near-total control over iOS distribution and payments has fueled years of antitrust battles — Epic Games, the U.S. DOJ, EU Digital Markets Act enforcement, court findings of non-compliance, and ongoing developer lawsuits. Critics call the commission the “Apple Tax,” complain about arbitrary review decisions, limited sideloading or alternative stores (outside certain regulated markets), and the risk that a single content flag can yank a major app offline without warning.

The recent Telegram episode fits the pattern perfectly. A brief App Store removal triggered by planted illegal content (which Telegram says was the work of a takedown extortionist) showed how Apple’s gatekeeper power can be gamed or lead to rapid, high-stakes reactions.

‎
Please help support MacDailyNews — and enjoy subscriber-only articles, comments, chat, and more — by subscribing to our Substack: macdailynews.substack.com. Thank you!

Support MacDailyNews at no extra cost to you by using this link to shop at Amazon.

The post Telegram CEO accuses ‘takedown extortionist’ of manipulating Apple into brief App Store removal appeared first on MacDailyNews.

Apple limits bug bounty programs as it struggles to keep pace with ‘AI slop’ hunters

✇MacDailyNews
By: MacDailyNews
5 August 2026 at 16:00

Apple logo

Apple has restricted the number of potentially dangerous software bugs researchers can submit to its internal security team, as it faces a deluge of reports from people using AI models to identify alleged risks, according to reporting by Tom Wilson in London and Michael Acton in San Francisco for Financial Times.

The Cupertino-based tech giant told the FT it had moved in June to limit the high volume of requests it was receiving, with its review system coming under pressure from “AI slop” reports that can hallucinate security risks in its software.

Apple is grappling with an industry-wide phenomenon in which generative AI tools are transforming the cyber security arms race. This has produced both an increase in the detection of real security flaws and a wave of poor-quality submissions from amateur bug hunters using AI, the company said.

The shift in Apple’s approach was highlighted by Italian cyber security start-up Bynario, which told the FT it had used OpenAI’s ChatGPT to identify more than 50 bugs in the latest version of the Mac operating system in just three weeks. Among them was one of the most serious types of vulnerability—a privilege escalation exploit chain that could allow an attacker to seize full control of an Apple computer by gaining unrestricted access to the system.

“It is a very difficult time in the industry,” said Alfredo Pesoli, Bynario’s CEO and co-founder. “Maintainers and vendors have been flooded by the sheer amount of bugs [being found].”

Apple told the FT that it is now in contact with Bynario and reviewing its submissions. The company has introduced a cap and a 30-day cool-off period on submissions through its internal security portal, requiring users to request an increased quota. Each alleged security issue still requires human review to confirm, although Apple is also using AI internally to help triage the surge.

“With the growing volume of AI-generated security submissions across the industry, we recently adjusted the number of new reports a researcher can have open at once,” Apple said in a statement. Researchers can request an increase to that limit at any time to ensure critical reports reach its security teams.

MacDailyNews Take: Overwhelmed.

‎
Please help support MacDailyNews — and enjoy subscriber-only articles, comments, chat, and more — by subscribing to our Substack: macdailynews.substack.com. Thank you!

Support MacDailyNews at no extra cost to you by using this link to shop at Amazon.

The post Apple limits bug bounty programs as it struggles to keep pace with ‘AI slop’ hunters appeared first on MacDailyNews.

Received — 6 August 2026 ⏭

Fabricante chinesa rejeitou vender RAM a preços menores para a Apple

✇MacMagazine
By: Fábio Carneiro
6 August 2026 at 15:28

Parece que a tentativa da Apple de colaborar com a fabricante chinesa de memória CXMT encontrou mais um empecilho no caminho: supostamente, a possível fornecedora demandou os mesmos valores (ou até maiores) pagos pela Maçã à Samsung Electronics e à SK Hynix. A informação veio do site sul-coreano Digital Daily.

O desgaste ocorreu após a Maçã tentar negociar os preços das memórias, tendo seu pedido de redução de preço rejeitado pela CXMT, que manteve preços semelhantes ou até mesmo superiores aos das demais fornecedoras da Apple.

Do lado da chinesa, há alguns motivos para essa postura: a barganha de uma empresa americana com uma série de exigências quanto aos processos de certificação de qualidade contrasta com o conforto do seu domínio do mercado doméstico, já que a fabricante possui contratos de longo prazo sob preços elevados com empresas como a HUAWEI e a Xiaomi.

Os desafios

Mesmo sob forte pressão da Micron e do Senado americano, a negociação com a CXMT (presente na lista de restrições comerciais do Pentágono como uma empresa militar da China, vale lembrar) foi uma alternativa encontrada por Tim Cook para mitigar os efeitos da crise de memória.

De acordo com um executivo da indústria de semicondutores consultado pelo veículo sul-coreano, a postura da CXMT ajudou a estabelecer um piso para os preços praticados com a DRAM 1Dynamic random access memory, ou memória dinâmica de acesso aleatório. convencional, suficiente para que a Samsung e a SK Hynix cobrassem um valor consideravelmente mais alto. Esse conforto mercadológico quanto às fornecedoras ocidentais também diz respeito ao foco de produção para memórias de alto desempenho destinadas a data centers de inteligência artificial (IA), deixando a produção para eletrônicos de consumo em segundo plano — o que naturalmente provoca escassez.

Segundo o analista Tim Culpan, a Apple e seus fornecedores estão correndo contra o relógio para obter chips de memória a tempo do lançamento da próxima geração de iPhones, prevista para ser anunciada no mês que vem. Esse cenário fez com que a Maçã recorresse especialmente à Micron, à Samsung e à SK Hynix. A escassez poderá afetar a disponibilidade do “iPhone 18 Pro” e do “iPhone 18 Pro Max”, embora ainda exista alguma confiança de que a demanda inicial poderá ser suprida.

Resta a dúvida se a Apple seguirá em suas tratativas com a CXMT ou se dará o braço a torcer aos interlocutores estadunidenses dessa história. Em ambos os cenários, infelizmente, parece que a conta irá chegar mais alta ao consumidor final.

via Wccftech, MacRumors

Notas de rodapé

  • 1
    Dynamic random access memory, ou memória dinâmica de acesso aleatório.

Crise de memórias: fornecedoras já teriam vendido toda a sua produção para 2027

✇MacMagazine
By: Bruno Cardoso
5 August 2026 at 17:52

A crise no mercado de DRAMs 1Dynamic random access memories, ou memórias dinâmicas de acesso aleatório. e HBMs 2High bandwidth memories, ou memórias de alta largura de banda., causada pelo boom das empresas de inteligência artificial (IA), pode ter alcançado seu ponto mais dramático até agora, com as produções de todas as três principais fabricantes desses tipos de componentes (Samsung Electronics, SK Hynix e Micron) já tendo sido reservadas para o ano de 2027 inteiro, segundo informações do DIGITIMES.

Além das memórias, outra categoria de componentes que tem sofrido bastante com a demanda causada por data centers de IA é a de chips NAND, muito utilizados em dispositivos de armazenamento flash (como SSDs 3Solid-state drives, ou unidades de estado sólido.). Embora a situação desses chips ainda não esteja tão apertada quanto a das memórias, fontes ouvidas pelo veículo dão conta de que a Samsung Electronics, a Micron e a SanDisk já venderam toda a sua produção para 2026 por preços altíssimos. A Kioxia e a SK Hynix, por sua vez, deverão firmar contratos parecidos com seus clientes até o fim deste mês.

Voltando para o caso das memórias, dados da Counterpoint Research dão conta de que a Samsung Electronics ficou responsável por 39% do mercado de DRAM (por receita) durante o segundo trimestre, seguida pela SK Hynix (com 26%) e pela Micron (25%). Apesar de todo o investimento nessas empresas, os rumores são de que os compradores de componentes estão recebendo apenas 60-70% dos volumes que solicitaram inicialmente, devido à capacidade de produção limitada.

Algumas dessas fornecedoras, é claro, são parceiras de longa data da Apple — que também tem sofrido com essa escassez de componentes, embora tenha conseguido absorver parte do impacto. Enquanto os iPhones têm passado ilesos por essa crise, produtos como os Macs e os iPads viraram alvo de aumentos expressivos de preços — algo que foi classificado por Tim Cook, o atual CEO 4Chief executive officer, ou diretor executivo. da empresa, como “enchente que ocorre uma vez a cada 100 anos”.

Ainda de acordo com o DIGITIMES, todos os compradores concordaram em realizar pagamentos adiantados por esses componentes, tenham eles estabelecido acordos de fornecimento multianuais anteriormente ou não. Ao que tudo indica, isso é uma resposta ao medo que muitas dessas empresas têm de que seus competidores tentem garantir o máximo de capacidade de produção possível — especialmente durante o período entre julho e agosto, que é quando a maior parte dos pedidos é feita.

Por ser uma das principais compradoras de memórias e chips NAND do mercado, é quase certo que a Apple também tenha desembolsado uma boa grana para garantir sua parcela de componentes para 2027, que é quando deveremos ver o “iPhone 20” chegar ao mercado. Não está claro, no entanto, por quanto mais tempo ela absorverá o impacto dos preços inflados — algumas pessoas, inclusive, acreditam que os próximos iPhones poderão ficar até US$300 mais caros por conta dessa crise.

Em uma clara manobra para tornar a sua lista de fornecedoras mais diversa, a Apple estaria testando memórias de marcas como a chinesa ChangXin Memory Technologies (CXMT), que passou a receber aportes de investidores recentemente. Isso, no entanto, não tem sido bem visto por políticos dos Estados Unidos (país natal da Maçã), que acusam a fornecedora de ter ligações com as forças armadas da China — país com o qual os americanos travam uma guerra comercial há alguns anos.

via AppleInsider, Seeking Alpha

Notas de rodapé

  • 1
    Dynamic random access memories, ou memórias dinâmicas de acesso aleatório.
  • 2
    High bandwidth memories, ou memórias de alta largura de banda.
  • 3
    Solid-state drives, ou unidades de estado sólido.
  • 4
    Chief executive officer, ou diretor executivo.

Received — 5 August 2026 ⏭

Como anexar ou escrever textos longos no Threads [iPhone e web]

✇MacMagazine
By: Pedro Henrique Nunes
5 August 2026 at 11:30

Com o Threads, é possível conversar com os milhões de usuários que utilizam a rede social diariamente para falar sobre os mais diversos assuntos.

A Meta introduziu, há um tempo, uma função dedicada para quem curte escrever bastante: a possibilidade de realizar uma publicação com até 10.000 caracteres — inclusive com ferramentas de formatação de texto, como negrito, itálico e tachado, por exemplo.

Veja como utilizar isso na prática! 📝

  1. Abra o app ou o site do Threads e toque/clique no ícone de “+” ou “Nova thread“.
  2. Selecione o ícone representado por uma folha de papel (no iPhone, é preciso tocar primeiramente no botão com três pontinhos para que ele apareça).
  3. Digite ou anexe o texto desejado no campo e use as ferramentas de formatação (negrito, itálico, sublinhado, tachado e destaque com cor) na parte inferior, se assim desejar.
  1. Quando quiser publicar o texto, toque/clique em “Concluir”.

Received — 4 August 2026 ⏭

Telegram é removido temporariamente da App Store por conteúdo ilegal [atualizado]

✇MacMagazine
By: Bruno Cardoso
4 August 2026 at 13:19

Usuários do Telegram notaram ontem que o aplicativo do mensageiro para iOS ficou indisponível na App Store por um breve período, o que deixou muita gente confusa.

Contatada pela Reuters, a Apple explicou que tirou o mensageiro do ar após um usuário ter reportado a presença de “material de abuso sexual infantil” na plataforma, o que obviamente vai contra as regras da sua loja.

Ainda segundo a gigante de Cupertino, a página do Telegram foi restaurada depois que a equipe do mensageiro removeu o conteúdo supracitado e baniu o usuário responsável pela publicação.

Em resposta, o mensageiro disse que possui uma política de “tolerância zero” contra esse tipo de conteúdo, além de ter bloqueado mais de 338.000 grupos e canais com material ilegal ao longo do último ano.

Ainda assim, a equipe do app ironizou a decisão da Apple nas redes sociais, dando a entender que a companhia não aplica o mesmo tratamento a outros apps. Ela também aproveitou a situação para divulgar uma página com dados sobre a moderação de conteúdo na plataforma:

I'm sure this stance will be applied equally to all other apps in the store, in the future right? @Apple

(btw: https://t.co/ZRYqIGaxVH)

— Telegram Messenger (@telegram) August 4, 2026
Tenho certeza de que essa postura será aplicada igualmente a todos os outros aplicativos da loja no futuro, certo? @Apple

(Aliás: telegram.org/safety#csam-gr…)

Outra pessoa a ir às redes sociais para comentar esse pequeno imbróglio foi o CEO 1Chief executive officer, ou diretor executivo. da Epic Games, Tim Sweeney, que criticou a falta de transparência na tomada de decisão da Apple, além de classificá-la como “arbitrária”. Em guerra com a fabricante do iPhone há alguns anos por conta das regras da App Store, ele aproveitou a situação para dizer que a loja da Maçã “precisa desesperadamente de concorrência”:

Such arbitrary policy enforcement, by a monopoly gatekeeper, creates a perfect storm of fear and acquiescence by developers who are victims of Apple’s monopoly. Speak up and criticize their gatekeeping and maybe they’ll enforce the rules one way rather than the other way.

— Tim Sweeney (@TimSweeneyEpic) August 4, 2026
A App Store da Apple precisa desesperadamente de concorrência global. A Apple remove arbitrariamente uma ferramenta vital de comunicação e privacidade, tornando-a inacessível a bilhões de usuários, e infelizmente isso é considerado normal.

A Apple declarou que removeu o aplicativo para um bilhão de pessoas porque um usuário do Telegram publicou algo horrível e ilegal. A empresa não explicou como, se esse é o padrão para remoção de aplicativos, qualquer aplicativo de comunicação, incluindo o iMessage, poderia operar em larga escala.

Essa aplicação arbitrária de políticas, por parte de um monopólio, cria a tempestade perfeita de medo e aquiescência por parte dos desenvolvedores, que são vítimas do monopólio da Apple. Manifeste-se e critique essa postura de controle, e talvez eles passem a aplicar as regras de uma forma, em vez de outra.

Questionada sobre os comentários de Sweeney, a Apple preferiu não emitir uma resposta.

Atualização 04/08/2026 às 13:10

O chefão do Telegram, Pavel Durov, finalmente se pronunciou sobre a remoção do seu app da App Store por meio de uma mensagem no seu canal pessoal.

Segundo ele, todo esse imbróglio foi provocado por um único usuário mal intencionado, que plantou conteúdo impróprio modificado por inteligência artificial (IA) em um grupo público na plataforma. Para tal, essa pessoa editou uma mensagem antiga na conversa, o que acabou fazendo com que ela passasse despercebida pelos administradores do grupo.

Ainda de acordo com Durov, esse usuário era um extorsionista — ou seja, uma pessoa que usa “contas automatizadas para plantar conteúdo ilegal em grupos públicos e depois denunciá-lo diretamente à Apple, tentando provocar a remoção de comunidades legítimas” cujos donos se recusaram a pagar o resgate.

O executivo também garantiu que a presença de conteúdo desse tipo na plataforma não representa um problema sistêmico e que sua equipe de moderação é efetiva, além de ter criticado a Apple por ter removido o app de sua loja sem contatar o Telegram primeiro. “Se um aplicativo usado por mais de 1 bilhão de pessoas pode ser removido da App Store sem aviso prévio, qualquer aplicativo pode ser”, comentou.

Notas de rodapé

  • 1
    Chief executive officer, ou diretor executivo.

Received — 3 August 2026 ⏭

Crise de memórias teria ampliado os prazos de entrega dos MacBooks Air

✇MacMagazine
By: Fábio Carneiro
3 August 2026 at 14:05

Na edição mais recente da newsletter “Power On” (da Bloomberg), o jornalista Mark Gurman tratou da disponibilidade de estoque dos MacBooks Air, que contam com prazos de entrega cada vez maiores. Para ele, o motivo não poderia ser outro: a crise de memórias que a indústria da tecnologia atravessa no momento.

Inicialmente, a limitação da disponibilidade era restrita ao Mac mini e ao Mac Studio, mas agora ela já afeta os notebooks mais populares da Maçã. Segundo as fontes de Gurman ligadas ao varejo, percebe-se uma maior dificuldade por parte da Apple em manter o estoque previsto, e também mais limitação no fornecimento de novas unidades.

Also in Power On: Major shortages hit the MacBook Air amid the memory and silicon crunch, with many new orders now not arriving until September. Apple appears to be prioritizing sales now of the entry level MacBook Pro. https://t.co/3aouZVsmsg

— Mark Gurman (@markgurman) August 2, 2026
Também na “Power On”: grande escassez atinge o MacBook Air em meio à crise de memórias e silício, com muitos novos pedidos agora não chegando até setembro.
A Apple parece estar priorizando agora as vendas do MacBook Pro de entrada.

A hipótese não parece difícil de atestar: para quem opta por adquirir os notebooks agora, seja em uma Apple Store física ou online, o prazo de entrega para novos modelos pode se estender até setembro em casos de personalização (cor, tela e memória) ou até o final de agosto para configurações básicas.

Ele afirmou que isso se deve em parte à priorização da aquisição de novas memórias para o MacBook Pro de entrada (modelo de 14 polegadas), que poderá ganhar em breve uma atualização com o chip “M6” durante o outono do hemisfério norte (nossa primavera — isto é, entre setembro e dezembro).

Por fim, o jornalista observou que, tanto em seus sites quanto nas lojas físicas, o MacBook Pro básico ganhou mais destaque do que os MacBooks Air, um feito possivelmente inédito. Em alguns casos, a Apple chega a incluir um aviso de que a linha Air está sujeita à disponibilidade de estoque.

MacBook Pro de 16″

Cores: preto-espacial ou prateado
Tela: padrão ou nano-texture
Chips: M5 Pro ou M5 Max
Memória: 24GB, 36GB, 48GB, 64GB ou 128GB
Armazenamento: 1TB, 2TB, 4TB ou 8TB
R$ 30.599,00
R$ 33.999,00

MacBook Pro de 14″

Cores: preto-espacial ou prateado
Tela: padrão ou nano-texture
Chips: M5, M5 Pro ou M5 Max
Memória: 24GB, 36GB, 48GB, 64GB ou 128GB
Armazenamento: 1TB, 2TB, 4TB ou 8TB
Adaptador de energia: USB-C de 70W ou 96W
R$ 30.959,00

MacBook Air de 15″

Cores: azul-céu, prateado, estelar ou meia-noite
Chip: M5
Memória: 16GB, 24GB ou 32GB
Armazenamento: 512GB, 1TB, 2TB ou 4TB
Adaptador de energia: USB‑C de 30W, 35W com duas portas ou 70W
R$ 15.999,00

MacBook Air de 13″

Cores: azul-céu, prateado, estelar ou meia-noite
Chip: M5
Memória: 16GB, 24GB ou 32GB
Armazenamento: 512GB, 1TB, 2TB ou 4TB
Adaptador de energia: USB‑C de 30W, 35W com duas portas ou 70W
R$ 12.599,00
R$ 13.999,00

NOTA DE TRANSPARÊNCIA: O MacMagazine recebe uma pequena comissão sobre vendas concluídas por meio de links deste post, mas você, como consumidor, não paga nada mais pelos produtos/serviços usando os nossos links de afiliado.

Como prorrogar o tempo que um story fica no ar no Instagram

✇MacMagazine
By: Pedro Henrique Nunes
3 August 2026 at 12:00

Os stories do Instagram sempre foram publicações temporárias. Depois de 24 horas, eles desaparecem completamente do seu perfil e ficam disponíveis só para você, em um arquivo privado.

Mas, com o lançamento do Instagram Plus, a Meta está permitindo estender o tempo que o seu story fica no ar — mais precisamente, por mais 24 horas (totalizando, então, 48 horas).

Veja como fazer isso! 😉

  1. Antes de mais nada, é importante que você já tenha feito a publicação na área de stories do aplicativo para iPhones e iPads.
  2. Com o app aberto, visualize a publicação e deslize o dedo de baixo para cima, para mostrar os perfis que viram o story e quem reagiu.
  1. Em seguida, toque no botão localizado ao lado da lixeira (na parte superior direita) e selecione “Prorrogar”.

Como ver uma prévia de um story do Instagram sem que ninguém saiba

✇MacMagazine
By: Pedro Henrique Nunes
3 August 2026 at 11:30

Com uma assinatura ativa do Instagram Plus, usuários de iPhones e iPads podem usufruir de diversos benefícios exclusivos que tornam a sua experiência com a rede social da Meta ainda melhor.

Um deles é a prévia de stories. Como o nome deixa claro, ela permite pré-visualizar o story de uma pessoa que você segue, sem que essa pessoa veja o seu nome na lista de visualizadores.

Veja como usar! 😄

  1. Antes de mais nada, certifique-se de ter uma assinatura ativa do Instagram Plus.
  2. Com o Instagram aberto no seu feed, mantenha o dedo pressionado em cima da bolinha de stories do contato.
  1. Uma prévia será mostrada por meio da miniatura, além dos tradicionais botões para silenciar as publicações e ver o perfil da pessoa/empresa.

❌