Piddington, a village in Oxfordshire, has voted to leave the UK by 91.6% to 8.4% on a turnout of 92%, in a symbolic referendum called in response to plans to house 1,200 migrants in a converted army camp nearby.
Laptops have long been a more expensive way to game, especially compared to a desktop gaming PC, for comparable components. But with the ever-rising costs of PC hardware in the current economic climate, it's a lot easier and now often cheaper to get a powerful prebuilt gaming PC or ready-made gaming laptop. Today's deal is on a large, 18-inch Asus ROG Strix G18 gaming laptop powered by an RTX 5080, now reduced by $600 to $2,699.99. It's still an expensive piece of kit, but you are getting a somewhat portable form factor and a good amount of memory and storage included in the specs for this large gaming laptop.
Asus's ROG Strix G18 is a large 18-inch laptop with a big screen. The 18-inch display sports an IPS panel with a 240Hz refresh rate and 500-nit brightness. Powering the display and your gaming performance is an NVIDIA RTX 5080 laptop GPU that includes 16GB of fast GDDR7 VRAM, along with the 24-core Core Ultra 9 275HX processor from Intel. Importantly, there's also a good amount of memory: 32GB of DDR5 RAM and a large 2TB PCIe Gen4 SSD for storage.
ROG Strix G18: was $3299.99 now $2699.99 A mighty 18-inch gaming laptop that uses a very powerful Nvidia RTX 5080 laptop GPU with 16GB of VRAM. The onboard processor is a 24-core Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, sporting boost clock frequencies of up to 5.1 GHz, with an ample 32GB of DDR5 memory. There's also plenty of room for your game collection on the included 2TB SSD.
For any future upgrades, there's easy tool-less access to the SSD and RAM slots, which is a nice feature on a laptop. The keyboard features plenty of RGB backlit lighting that is configurable through Asus's Armory Crate software, along with an RGB light bar along the bottom of the laptop chassis, casting a distinctive glow on your desk that can sync with your keyboard and peripheral lighting.
For video connectivity, there's 1 x HDMI 2.1 port and 2 x Thunderbolt 5 ports, plus an Ethernet port for wired network access, with wireless options including Bluetooth and WiFi 7.
So if you want a ready-to-go gaming setup that's powerful enough to play all the latest game titles on a sharp 2.5K screen at high settings and frame rates, then the Asus ROG Strix G18 with RTX 5080 is a great choice, especially when you can save a hefty $600 off the price tag.
These are all the specs you'll want for a machine that will comfortably play games at 1080p. The current-gen Nvidia GeForce RTX 5060 is top of the list, though, with features like DLSS that mean you'll be able to take advantage of both upscaling and multi-frame generation, making games smoother to play if you decide to boost up to higher resolutions or better graphics settings.
The RTX 5060 will be a significant improvement over an older graphics card or integrated GPU, too. It has 3,840 CUDA cores, along with 8GB of GDDR7 VRAM. With DLSS enabled, this'll let you run most games at 1080p with high graphics presets enabled.
You're also getting the best value GPU in our GPU hierarchy when looking at FPS per dollar at 1080p with the RTX 5060. The 8GB of VRAM isn't as limiting as you'd think with a build like this, because you're not going to be hitting 4K here. It has more than enough power for modern games, but you'll need to occasionally optimize for the mos demanding ones. 1440p is possible in some games, too, especially with MFG switched on.
(Image credit: Future)
As far as the CPU goes, the Intel Core i5-14400F processor is a little older these days, but still a well-sold and solid option in pre-builts at this price point. You get 10 cores, with six performance cores that offer the best performance for gaming. The other four are efficiency cores for multi-threaded work, with a clock speed that can boost up to 4.7 GHz in total.
You'd expect compromises elsewhere, especially with RAM and SSD prices flying through the roof at the minute, but you don't see that here. 32GB of DDR5 RAM is a good amount for a rig at this price, while a 2TB SSD with Gen 4 speeds leaves plenty of space for a growing games collection. Wi-Fi 6E and Bluetooth 5.3 support gives you good wireless connectivity, with gigabit Ethernet for a faster wired hook-up to your network.
You won't really see many PCs priced as well as this $1,429 MSI Codex R2 gaming PC at the moment. Yes, this spec is pricier than it was a year ago, but you could easily pay more for less in the current market. If 1080p gaming, with DLSS-supported 1440p upscaling, is all you want and need, this is the rig you'll want to buy before the $270 discount disappears.
All roads lead to Rome. It’s one of the oldest sayings in the Western world, and according to a new study in Nature Communications, it isn’t quite true. Led by Adam Pažout, a researcher at the Autonomous University of Barcelona, the team found that cities like Antioch, Ancyra (modern Ankara), Byzantium (modern Istanbul), and Corinth […]
“Recursive self-improvement” is the idea that artificial intelligence could learn to build and train itself, creating exponential new progress — and risk.
Now that many devops organizations are using AI code generators, vibe coding, and applying spec-driven development practices, the questions increase. How does the AI know your organization’s standards? What processes monitor and enforce these standards? What are the developer responsibilities for owning the outcomes?
“Generative AI will happily hand you the movie set of an app with looks of a house from the street. The doors and windows open, and the demo runs clean,” says Mike Toole, director of security and IT at Blumira. “Behind the facade, there’s no plumbing and no wiring: no input validation, no auth boundaries, nothing actually holding it up. If your only gate is ‘does it run and look right,’ you’re shipping a set, not a building.”
One report shows that 92% of developers use AI coding tools daily in 2026 and that 41% of all global code is now AI-generated. Will all that code deliver value, operational issues, or mounting AI debt? I spoke to several experts about how to keep AI-generated code aligned with organizational standards and how to define an AI code generator’s context beyond just functional requirements.
Document like a construction specification
A general contractor in the construction industry will review building information models that provide a view of what they are developing. But many of the details are in the construction specifications, including component stipulations and performance requirements. Devops teams without equivalent documentation for their organization, architectures, and applications may have gotten away with this omission in the pre-AI era. But institutional knowledge and compliance requirements are the context AI code generators need before you share the first functional prompts with them.
“AI-generated code stays aligned with engineering standards only when those standards are explicit, available, and difficult to bypass,” says Eddie Zhou, founding engineer at Glean. “Put architecture, approved libraries, data-handling rules, security controls, naming conventions, observability, test expectations, and non-functional requirements into specs and automated checks. Then, ensure you give the model that context but treat its output as untrusted until it passes the same reviews, tests, scans, and production monitoring as human-written code.”
Overcoming tribal knowledge was always challenging as devops teams had too much pressure to push features and little incentive to maintain documentation. Two of my top AI leadership skills are change management and agile collaborative leadership, because devops teams need practice alignment while introducing AI capabilities.
Zhou adds, “AI amplifies ambiguity and weak governance as efficiently as good engineering. If standards live only in tribal knowledge, AI will expose that problem, not solve it.”
Encode non-functional requirements as automated tests
The problem with requirement documents and reference architectures is they aren’t directly enforceable with human or AI developers. Once a devops team agrees on standards and documents them, the next step is to develop approaches to encode them as automated acceptance criteria in CI/CD pipelines.
“AI code generators and human developers optimize for functional correctness—making the feature work—and quietly skip the non-functional requirements where most of your real standards live, including performance, security posture, error handling, observability, and auditability,” says Michael Bevilacqua, vice president of AI product management at Adeptia. “Encode your NFRs as executable acceptance criteria that generated code must pass before it merges, so ‘aligned with our standards’ becomes a gate the pipeline enforces on every change.”
An example: Performance requirements stating that all web pages should have a total page weight under 2MB can be validated during the pull request, and requiring the time to first byte (TTFB) to be under 800ms can be automated in CI/CD in a staging environment.
Requirements for stakeholders and AI
Architecture and automated non-functional requirements covering performance, security, and other organization-level compliance requirements should become the base-level context standards shared with AI-code generators. The next set of considerations for setting accurate contexts starts with application- and agent-specific requirements, their intended use cases, and specific compliance guardrails.
“CIOs are mandating AI to build apps faster, but many are realizing speed isn’t the bottleneck because more code doesn’t automatically create business value,” says Matt Healy, senior director of product strategy and marketing at Pegasystems. “Before developers write any code, organizations must understand customer needs, assess legacy systems, stay current with regulations and best practices, map enterprise architectures and integrations, and align business and IT.”
Consider three stages of understanding requirements. Once stakeholders set business value and intent, developers must first align on an implementation strategy and discuss performance, cost, and other trade-offs. Then, developers should reconvene with stakeholders and review implementation trade-offs. Healy adds, “On large projects, defining the solution and success metrics can take as much time as building it. Leaders aren’t just using AI to accelerate development, but to help executives, business analysts, product owners, and IT teams collaborate more effectively.”
The third stage is gathering the goals, user requirements, and implementation approach into a development-specific context. But we’re not done yet, because data requirements and operations considerations must also be included in the context fed to AI code generators.
Build governance into the specs
How the application or AI agent being developed can use the data it has access to requires clear specifications. Data governance programs should have standards based on data sets, defined roles, entitlements, and usage specifications.
Kash Mehdi, vice president and field CTO at Reltio, says the teams that are pulling ahead treat data governance as an input to AI, not an audit after it. “They ground their tools in trusted, semantically consistent data models, approved specs, and security policies, so the AI inherits the organization’s standards instead of inventing its own. Without that governed context layer, you don’t scale from a handful of AI-assisted workflows to thousands; you just accumulate inconsistent code faster,” Mehdi says.
Here are two options to consider in creating standards: First, establish repurposable data sets as data products with defined integrations and usage rules. Organizations with many data sets and integration points should consider data fabrics. The second (and key requirement) is to standardize the format of data contracts, using human- and machine-readable formats so that data owners, users, and AI code generators operate from a consistent set of principles.
“AI writes code that compiles and passes tests but quietly ignores your data contracts, so the failures show up in production as corrupted state, not build errors,” says Ed Huang, cofounder and CEO of TiDB. “The fix is to make governance machine-checkable, including schema constraints, access policies, and data-quality rules enforced at the database layer where the AI can’t route around them, not documented in a wiki the model never reads. Treat the database as the enforcement point for your standards, and it stops mattering whether a human or an agent wrote the query.”
Observability and testing first
When AI generates the code, a best practice is to use static application security testing (SAST) and other code analysis tools to perform automated code reviews. Another best practice is to put applications through penetration testing and other application security validations. But many of these tools are outside in view of what the AI developed. To get an inside view, observability and testing requirements must be included as a standard, with specific requirements around the key transactions you’re asking the AI to develop.
Sanjay Gidwani, CEO and founder at Kosmos, says, “More code volume just means more time spent investigating, and the fix isn’t reading the code more carefully before it ships. It’s connecting the observability signal, the thing that broke, back to the specific change that caused it. Without that link, you’re doing the same manual investigation as before, just with a bigger haystack.”
Testing requirements must go beyond generating automated tests, using synthetic data to expand the test patterns, and implementing continuous testing. “Instead of testing one input against one output, test whether an invariant holds across a wide range of generated inputs, which is a good fit for AI’s unbounded input space and non-deterministic outputs,” says Lior Gavish, cofounder and CTO at Monte Carlo. “I treat it as one layer in a stack with evals mapping the input space, property-based testing stress-testing it for edge cases and brittleness, and observability on live traffic checking whether production is drifting from the properties you defined as non-negotiable.”
Package and evolve the standards
Ed Frederici, CTO at Appfire, recommends codifying standards as machine-readable rules, including linters, formatters, and type checks. Merge the organizational and application standards into one context shared with the AI code-generating tool. His other recommendations:
Enforce standards in continuous integration so violations block merges.
Give the AI persistent context, such as CLAUDE.md, style guides, and architecture docs.
Keep changes small and reviewable.
Require human review of every pull request because AI-generated code must get the same scrutiny as any contributor’s. No exceptions.
Back this approach with solid test coverage to catch regressions.
Periodically audit for drift as your standards evolve.
It’s also important to remember that as code must be extended and maintained, so must the underlying development standards. “AI-generated code only stays aligned with your standards when it’s powered by a context engine that keeps learning, not a static snapshot of your rules,” says Itamar Friedman, CEO and cofounder at Qodo. “That means an engine that continuously adapts to your codebase’s evolving standards, your team’s PR history, and the prior decisions your engineers have already made, so the AI isn’t just following instructions but actually understands how your team works.”
As more devops organizations rely on AI code-generating tools, developers have an important opportunity to develop the standards and automated validations required to ensure what is built meets engineering and compliance requirements.
To see Local Lists in Apple Maps on iOS 27, type “Local Lists” into the search field, tap Guides, then pick a collection such as restaurants or kid-friendly spots. The feature works only in select U.S. cities, and Apple doesn’t say which ones. Apple describes Local Lists as “relevant collections of locations trending in your […]
With Dual SIM on iOS 27, the setting that picks which number a Messages conversation uses is called Conversation Line, and it sits in that conversation’s details. Open the conversation, tap the contact or group icon at the top, tap Conversation Line, then tap a line or alias. Apple’s iOS 26 guide gave a different […]
Problemas relacionados com páginas ou aplicações que demoram muito tempo a carregar e quedas de ligação curtas e streaming de vídeo são os três casos mais frequentes reportados pelos utilizadores.
If a show you follow in Podcasts seems to be missing older episodes, check the filter first. Apple’s iOS 27 guide says a followed show is filtered to Unplayed episodes by default, so anything you’ve finished drops out of the list until you remove that filter or search for it. The same guide explains how […]
To change what the Action button does on Apple Watch Ultra, open the Settings app, tap Action Button, tap Action, then pick a function such as Workout, Backtrack or Dive. The same button sounds the siren: press and hold it, wait for the countdown to finish, and the watch starts an alarm meant to attract […]
In iOS 27, the Journal app can suggest writing prompts “based on what you write and any photos or drawings you add to your entry,” and you can add up to three of them to a single entry. The prompts come from Apple Intelligence, and one switch hides them: Settings > Apps > Journal > […]
To ask Siri AI a question on a Mac running macOS 27, press Command-Space bar to open Spotlight, type your question or request, and press Return. Once Siri AI (Beta) is turned on, Apple’s Mac User Guide says Spotlight “becomes the place where you start a conversation with Siri.” From that one window, Apple says, […]
AirPods 5 have no setup button on the back of the case, so you reset them by tapping the front of the case instead. Open the lid, double-tap the front three times as the status light changes, and wait for the light to flash amber, then white. Apple’s support document on resetting AirPods, dated September […]
Login
