Chief of nuclear watchdog says secret Assad-era facility would have been able to produce fissile material
A nearly complete nuclear reactor built secretly during the rule of the toppled Syrian leader Bashar al-Assad would have been able to produce fissile material for possible use in nuclear weapons, the chief of the UN nuclear watchdog has revealed.
Inspectors from the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) last month visited two sites, one in Deir ez-Zor and a second in an undisclosed location identified to them by Syrian authorities.
Continue reading...
© Photograph: Mahmoud Hassano/Reuters
© Photograph: Mahmoud Hassano/Reuters
© Photograph: Mahmoud Hassano/Reuters
Scientists have measured antineutrino emissions from spent nuclear fuel for the first time, demonstrating that monitoring efforts need not stop when the reactors do. This is important because although independent nuclear safeguarding agencies have long used antineutrino emissions to glean information on reactor operations, previous detection schemes only worked when the reactors were running. Now, however, members of the Double Chooz collaboration have shown that it is possible to detect residual antineutrino emissions during a complete reactor shutdown – including from spent fuel stored in cooling pools.
Like neutrinos, antineutrinos are tiny, nearly massless fundamental particles that come in three flavours: electron, muon and tau. The largest human-made sources of electron antineutrinos are the reactor cores of nuclear power plants, which produce them via beta decay of neutron-rich fragments that are primarily generated during the fission of heavy elements such as uranium and plutonium.
Because antineutrinos interact so rarely with other particles, their emissions cannot be shielded and their signatures cannot be altered. They can also be detected some distance from the power plant itself. All these features make them valuable for nonintrusive nuclear reactor monitoring. Indeed, the idea of using antineutrinos to provide real-time information about the fissile content of a reactor core – and thereby detect illicit production of material that could be used in nuclear weapons manufacturing – dates back to the 1970s.
When a reactor is shut down, long-lived fission products (found in burnt fuel assemblies that remain in the reactor core, as well as assemblies that were previously removed and stored in nearby cooling pools) continue to decay, producing a residual neutrino flux. However, this residual signal is only around 1% as strong as the signal from an operating reactor. It also lies in a region of the energy spectrum that is strongly affected by background activities.
In the new work, which is detailed in Physical Review Letters, a team led by Thierry Lasserre and Anthony Onillon from the Max-Planck-Institut für Kernphysik (MPIK) in Heidelberg, Germany, succeeded in measuring the residual neutrino flux and its energy spectrum despite these difficulties. They obtained their data from the Double Chooz neutrino detection experiment, which is located near the two 4.25 GWth cores of the Chooz B nuclear power plant in the French Ardennes. This experiment uses a pair of detectors – labelled “near” and “far” and located around 400 m and 1.05 km from the cores – to study a fundamental parameter called the 𝜃13 neutrino mixing angle that describes how neutrinos transform between different types as they travel.
The Chooz plant uses a pair of pressurized water reactors, each of which contains 205 fuel assemblies consisting of roughly 600 kg of enriched uranium dioxide (mainly 238U with a few percent of 235U). During operation, these reactors also produce additional fissile isotopes, 239Pu and 241Pu, through neutron capture and subsequent decay processes involving 238U. In a typical cycle, they operate at full power for over a year and are then shut down for six to eight weeks for refuelling. During this time, some of the spent fuel assemblies are removed and transferred to storage pools in a nearby building.
The Double Chooz neutrino detector consists of more than 30 m3 of liquid scintillator, which is a material that emits short, double flashes of light when an antineutrino hits it. The outer part of the detector is shielded from the background radiation of the surrounding mountain rocks by 15 cm of demagnetized steel for the far detector and 1 m of water for the near detector. The inner part of the detector is shielded by a thick layer of mineral oil. Finally, an outer “muon veto” consisting of segmented scintillator modules positioned above the detector eliminates contributions from cosmic muons that can mask the signal from the antineutrinos.
The researchers collected their data in 2017 when both of Chooz’s reactors were simultaneously shut down for 24.4 days for refuelling and maintenance. This unusual double shutdown was long enough for the team to obtain the statistics and low background signals needed to extract, for the first time, a quantitative residual reactor antineutrino spectrum.
After accounting for muon veto-induced dead time, the researchers clocked up 17.2 days of measurements for the near detector and 22.2 days for the far detector. While they analysed data from both, they mainly focused on the near detector because it is closer to the reactor cores and spent fuel pools and is therefore more sensitive to the residual antineutrino flux.
In the 1–3 MeV range, where the residual neutrino signal is strongest, the researchers observed 106 ±18 events, which represents a 5.9 σ excess over the background. This value, they say, is in very good agreement with the 88 ±7 events predicted by detailed simulations of the remaining nuclear fuel inventory and the decay of long-lived fission products.
According to the researchers, this result had a long gestation period: “In 2003, the IAEA safeguards met with the neutrino community and raised a question: could antineutrinos also provide information on spent nuclear fuel?
“The main difficulty has been detecting the faint residual antineutrino signal. This meant obtaining data during periods when both Chooz reactors were simultaneously off, very low and well-controlled detector backgrounds, and a detailed simulation of the irradiation and cooling history of relevant fuel assemblies.”
The researchers hope that their result will become a robust benchmark for agencies and experimenters designing detectors for specific spent-fuel monitoring applications. “Such monitoring is feasible and could provide an independent, non-intrusive complement to reactor-status and spent fuel inventory,” they tell Physics World, though they add that “it will not necessarily be easy, compact or inexpensive to implement.”
The post Antineutrino detector could monitor spent nuclear fuel for clandestine activity appeared first on Physics World.
Emergency crews say situation remains ‘dynamic’ as more than 100 firefighters battle Dunwich Heath blaze
A wildfire near Britain’s biggest nuclear power station has caused “total devastation” to one of the UK’s most important landscapes, as fire crews said the situation remained “dynamic”.
More than 100 firefighters have been battling the blaze on Dunwich Heath, near Leiston, on the Suffolk coast since Wednesday evening. The fire service said on Friday afternoon the situation was stabilising but remained a “major incident” that was “dynamic and potentially changeable”.
Continue reading...
© Photograph: Humphrey Nemar/PA
© Photograph: Humphrey Nemar/PA
© Photograph: Humphrey Nemar/PA
Donald Trump approves agreement to help country make fuel for civilian nuclear programme
Donald Trump signed a nuclear agreement with Saudi Arabia on Wednesday that could enable the kingdom to enrich its own uranium for nuclear reactions.
The US energy secretary, Chris Wright, and his Saudi counterpart, Prince Abdulaziz bin Salman, signed “a peaceful nuclear cooperation agreement” and “an accompanying bilateral safeguards agreement,” according to a statement from the US Department of Energy.
Continue reading...
© Photograph: Win McNamee/Getty Images
© Photograph: Win McNamee/Getty Images
© Photograph: Win McNamee/Getty Images
GenCost report contradicts parties’ claims about abandoning emissions target, and finds nuclear would be most expensive way to generate power
Get our breaking news email, free app or daily news podcast
Claims by the Coalition and One Nation that abandoning a net zero climate target would bring down power prices are contradicted in a new CSIRO report on the costs of generating electricity.
Generation costs will probably rise after 2030 regardless of Australia’s policy on net zero, according to the CSIRO’s annual GenCost report, but prices should then stabilise at levels below recent price spikes.
Continue reading...
© Photograph: Philippe Lopez/AFP/Getty Images
© Photograph: Philippe Lopez/AFP/Getty Images
© Photograph: Philippe Lopez/AFP/Getty Images
Welcome to this edition of The Intelligence Brief… This week, a new milestone has been reached in space technology, with the launch of the world’s first satellite equipped with a commercial betavoltaic nuclear power system. The satellite was carried to orbit on a a SpaceX Falcon 9 rocket on Tuesday, and in our analysis, we’ll be looking at 1) how the next generation of compact nuclear power systems are now being tested aboard the first City Labs BOHR satellite, 2) how the satellite converts radioactive decay into electricity, and why this technology could eventually help to facilitate long-term space missions to the Moon and other locales, 3) the advantages and hurdles this novel tritium-based power system faces, and 4) what this all could mean for the future of nuclear powered spacecraft used in deep-space missions.
“This is a historic step for commercial nuclear power in space.”
If you enjoy the news and perspectives offered by The Debrief, make sure that you aren’t missing our stories by making us one of your “preferred sources” on Google News. You can simply follow this link to add The Debrief to your list of favorites, and you can read more about Google’s preferred sources in our article here.
Tuesday marked a new chapter in the quest for novel power systems for spacecraft, with the launch of the world’s first satellite equipped with a commercial betavoltaic nuclear power system.
The City Labs Betavoltaic Orbital High-Reliability (BOHR) satellite was carried to space on board a SpaceX Falcon 9 rocket, and in the coming weeks will begin tests to determine whether miniature nuclear batteries can reliably generate electricity in space.
Designed primarily as a proof of concept, the first BOHR satellite will rely on conventional solar panels for its primary power system. However, the first-of-its-kind spacecraft also carries the company’s proprietary “NanoTritium” betavoltaic power source, which, according to the company, uses beta particles emitted during the radioactive decay of tritium that are converted into electricity.
In a statement, Peter Cabauy, CEO of City Labs, called this week’s launch “a historic step for commercial nuclear power in space,” adding that the BOHER satellite “demonstrates that safe, compact, and regulatory-approved nuclear power systems are ready for routine commercial deployment.”
“This capability enables persistent, always-on payload operations that are not constrained by sunlight or battery life,” Cabauy added.
The innovative satellite was carried to space earlier this week as part of the recent SpaceX Transporter-17 mission.
“On Tuesday, July 7 at 12:12 a.m. PT, Falcon 9 launched the Transporter-17 mission to low-Earth orbit from Space Launch Complex 4E (SLC-4E) at Vandenberg Space Force Base in California,” read an update that appeared at the SpaceX website announcing the successful launch that carried the City Labs BOHR satellite to space.
“Transporter-17 was a dedicated smallsat rideshare mission,” SpaceX’s update earlier this week added. “There were 81 payloads on this flight, including cubesats, microsats, hosted payloads, and orbital transfer vehicles carrying eight of those payloads to be deployed at a later time.”
Following the satellite’s successful delivery to orbit, its power systems will begin testing the feasibility of beta radiation as a primary driver to produce electricity. In the past, radioisotope thermoelectric generators have been used to propel landmark space missions, such as Voyager 1 and Voyager 2. By contrast, BOHR’s beta radiation system does not rely on heat generated by radioactive decay, which allows for a compact power source that, if all goes according to plan, could one day be deployed in future missions to support spacecraft operating in environments where sunlight is limited. Such applications include the permanently shadowed craters on the Moon and future missions into the outer solar system.
Primarily, City Labs says a tritium-based system is also more beneficial than traditional nuclear fuels like plutonium since it emits relatively low-energy radiation. This, the company says, makes it easier to shield and safer to handle during spacecraft assembly and launch.
The technology does face significant hurdles, however. One involves the fact that tritium is presently still one of the world’s rarest—and most expensive—radioactive materials. Right now, with only around 20 kilograms produced annually throughout the world, the limited quantity and exorbitant costs (current prices reach tens of thousands of dollars per gram) make large-scale adoption anytime in the near term a significant challenge.
There are also regulatory considerations, as noted in a news article released this week by the American Nuclear Society (ANS) following the launch. “In 2019, National Security Presidential Memorandum – 20 (NSPM-20) laid out updates to the process for launching spacecraft containing nuclear systems,” the article states.
“Now the Department of Transportation, which includes the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), directs the coordination of various agencies to review the safety analysis for missions with nuclear components,” the ANS news brief added, noting that the FAA updated its launch regulations in 2020.
Despite the existence of a few hurdles and other considerations, the mission nonetheless marks an important milestone in the development of next-generation spacecraft power systems. If successful, BOHR could demonstrate that compact betavoltaic power sources are a viable complement to solar energy, opening new possibilities for long-duration missions in some of the darkest and most remote regions of the solar system.
That concludes this week’s installment of The Intelligence Brief. You can read past editions of our newsletter at our website, or if you found this installment online, don’t forget to subscribe and get future email editions from us here. Also, if you have a tip or other information you’d like to send along directly to me, you can email me at micah [@] thedebrief [dot] org, or reach me on X: @MicahHanks.
Here are the top stories we’re covering right now…
The proliferation of nuclear power in space got a little more real Tuesday with the launch of a small satellite developed by a Florida-based company specializing in nuclear micro-power technology.
It's a long way from launching a bona fide nuclear reactor, a breakthrough that could help power a permanent Moon base and efficiently drive rockets throughout the Solar System. But you have to start somewhere.
The satellite from Miami-based City Labs is named BOHR, short for Betavoltaic Orbital High-Reliability, and it launched on a SpaceX rideshare mission Tuesday alongside 80 other payloads. SpaceX's Falcon 9 rocket released the BOHR satellite into an orbit between 350 and 400 miles (nearly 600 km) in altitude.
© City Labs
The proliferation of nuclear power in space got a little more real Tuesday with the launch of a small satellite developed by a Florida-based company specializing in nuclear micro-power technology.
It's a long way from launching a bona fide nuclear reactor, a breakthrough that could help power a permanent Moon base and efficiently drive rockets throughout the Solar System. But you have to start somewhere.
The satellite from Miami-based City Labs is named BOHR, short for Betavoltaic Orbital High-Reliability, and it launched on a SpaceX rideshare mission Tuesday alongside 80 other payloads. SpaceX's Falcon 9 rocket released the BOHR satellite into an orbit between 350 and 400 miles (nearly 600 km) in altitude.
© City Labs
Last week, just before the US started its break for the July Fourth holiday, the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) proposed a new rule that would change how it regulated exposure to radiation. The Trump administration has been pushing to restart construction of nuclear power plants in the US, and many pro-nuclear advocates have been complaining about the US's existing regulations, portraying them as the main barrier to the flourishing of the industry. So, it had seemed likely that major revisions were coming.
Instead, the NRC's proposed new rules endorse the science behind its current rules and suggest that any problems are largely in the vagueness of the terminology that it has been using. So, instead, it's endorsing standards that are meant to accomplish the same thing, but avoid using some of the language it had relied on. Probably the clearest indication of the evolutionary change at play is that the NRC estimates the changing rules will save industry—not just power, but also medical and research applications—only about $9.5 million a year.
There are two technical abbreviations at the center of US nuclear regulations. The first is LNT, which stands for "linear non-threshold." It's in reference to the issue of whether there's any level of radiation that is so low that it no longer produces harmful biological effects—the "threshold" in LNT. The "non-threshold" implies that it doesn't, and that's in keeping with biology, which has demonstrated that even single particles or photons of radiation can damage DNA and that the mechanisms cells have for repairing that damage are inherently error-prone. The "linear" in LNT simply describes how the impact of radiation scales directly with the dose.
© SOPA Images
Extension comes as government encourages first nuclear power projects in a generation to meet UK’s growing need for electricity
Britain’s most recently completed nuclear power plant will continue generating electricity until 2055 after the government granted the power plant a 20-year life extension.
Sizewell B in Suffolk was due to shut down within the next decade, but under a deal with the government its lifetime will be extended to 60 years to help meet the UK’s growing demand for low-carbon electricity.
Continue reading...
© Photograph: Chris Radburn/AFP/Getty Images
© Photograph: Chris Radburn/AFP/Getty Images
© Photograph: Chris Radburn/AFP/Getty Images
The economic shock of the closure of the Strait of Hormuz has sparked calls to abandon fossil fuels faster. But that's the wrong lesson, says Richard Lyon – and Net Zero obsessed Britain will learn this the hard way.
The post Hormuz: The Slow-Motion Crash appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.
Just over a year ago, the Trump Administration issued an executive order meant to accelerate the development of nuclear power in the US. While an entire startup ecosystem has developed around the use of different—and typically smaller—reactor designs, only one of them has been fully licensed so far, and there are no plans to actually build any instances of that design.
The executive order directed the Department of Energy to have three different reactor designs reach criticality in a bit over a year. On Thursday, a startup called Antares announced that a test reactor it had placed at the Idaho National Laboratory had reached criticality, making it the first new design to cross this threshold. Criticality means that the nuclear reactions inside the hardware had become self sustaining; it does not mean the reactor had started to generate power.
Antares is one of a number of companies that is basing its design on a new fuel system called TRISO that takes some of the complexity and safety out of the reactor design and places them in the fuel design. The fuel design is based on tiny pellets with a uranium oxide core. The pellets are surrounded by several layers of carbon that can moderate the energy of both the neutrons and lighter nuclei that are released by fission reactions. All of that is encased in a hard ceramic shell that's designed to withstand the highest temperatures that can be produced by the encased uranium.
© Department of Energy
Login