I review the story "Project Hail Mary" by Andy Weir and the 2026 film. As science it is fundamentally flawed. Life is assumed to have evolved along a line different to the biochemistry we find on Earth. But that is the problem. Life on Earth could only come from an Intelligent Creator.

The concepts of heaven and cosmology, including the multiverse and parallel universes, are explored. I discuss differences between physical dimensions and the spiritual realm, critiquing string theory and advocating for a spiritual understanding of heaven as distinct from physical dimensions and laws.

Congresswoman Anna Luna chaired a US Congress committee hearing, where witnesses testified on secret UAP encounters and advanced technologies. The discourse highlighted that UFOs are real and potentially may be covert military technology. Definitely some are spiritual phenomena, suggesting a great deception underlying these experiences.

Satan's rebellion has led humanity to believe in false origins of life, such as abiogenesis and panspermia, instead of a divine Creator. I critique the scientific community's efforts to explain life without acknowledging supernatural creation, asserting the biblical viewpoint that true life and intelligence can only stem from God.

Interdimensional beings are extradimensional beings, as distinct from extraterrestrials are perceived as entities in realms beyond our physical universe, governed by different principles. These beings may exist as energy or abstract forms and are common in science fiction and spiritual demonic contexts. Modern scientific language is used to make them acceptable.

Tucker Carlson correctly stated that modern so-called aliens are just demons, which are described in the Old Testament of the Bible. These same demons are still around. They haven't gone anywhere. And there are many who worship them seeking after power and wealth, believing their deceptive promises.

The discovery of interstellar object 3I/ATLAS raises speculation about its nature, with some suggesting it could be an alien spacecraft. However, most astronomers believe it is a comet. The question highlights differing belief systems regarding the origins of life, with critics emphasizing the necessity of extraordinary evidence for such claims.

The WSJ reports that the Pentagon fabricated UFO evidence. They faked it to cover up secret weapons development! However the belief in aliens and UFOs stems from a rejection of the Creator, leading to deception fueled by spiritual forces.

Recent claims of potential biosignatures on the exoplanet K2-18b have been challenged by researchers at the University of Chicago. Their analysis suggests that the detection of dimethyl sulfide may be inconclusive due to overlapping signals from non-biological molecules, emphasizing the limitations of current detection technology and urging caution against premature conclusions.

The video clip of orbs circling a passenger plane prompts speculation about its origins, including faked footage, extraterrestrial craft, or military technology. After analysis, I dismiss the latter two due to physical impossibilities, instead propose that these are interdimensional craft linked to the spiritual realm.

An article claims scientists found evidence of biological activity on exoplanet K2-18b, citing detected molecules linked to microbial life. However, this overstates findings, because some other chemical processes may explain the results. The inordinate desire to find extraterrestrial life reflects a rejection of the Creator.

Hoyle's hypothesis of panspermia lacks any scientific validity and merely shifts the question of life's origins into the unseen cosmos. The notion of a sentient universe is paganism, and a rejection of biblical creation.

Extraterrestrial life has been searched for without success, and now a new method is suggested. I participated in an interview on the David Rives Genesis Science Report about this new search method, which examines similarities among clustered planets, suggesting terraforming has occurred.

Life imitates art! The movie The Invasion (2007) involves an alien epidemic portrayed as a flu pandemic that transforms humans into emotionless beings. Parallels to the COVID-19 pandemic are drawn, depicting societal control, altered health, and profound implications of vaccination on humanity's future.

The Search for Extra-Terrestrial Intelligence (SETI) program has yielded no evidence of intelligent life beyond Earth, raising questions about life’s uniqueness to our planet. Critics claim SETI lacks empirical support and resembles ufology. The author argues that life is a divine creation, asserting evolution cannot account for life's origin or complexity.

A research paper proposes that advanced alien civilizations might be terraforming planets and spreading life through panspermia. It suggests that similarities among clustered planets could indicate extraterrestrial life, while acknowledging the challenges in detecting such life. This approach sidesteps the fundamental questions of life's origins.

Ezekiel's vision is discussed, questioning whether it depicts a divine encounter or ancient astronauts. I critique Erich von Däniken's theories on UFOs, emphasize that advanced propulsion technologies have military origins, and confirm that true anti-gravity remains unattainable within known physics, dismissing claims of reverse-engineered alien technology.

There are many sightings of multiple UFOs around important military sites. Also that the US government has covered up the truth of visiting aliens / UFOs for decades. It all adds to the mystique which might be used to get the masses to comply with authoritarian diktats.

Earth has many unique features for a planet, such as a magnetic field, a large moon, and plate tectonics. It’s also the only planet we know of that harbors life. These facts form the basis of the Rare Earth hypothesis, which posits that we haven’t found aliens because other planets in the Galaxy probably don’t have all the right conditions for life. 

Another characteristic of Earth is that about 30% of its surface is land and about 70% is ocean. Recently, Columbia University Assistant Professor David Kipping investigated whether the proportion of Earth’s surface covered by dry land versus ocean, or its land fraction, is another reason Earth is habitable not only for simple single-celled organisms, but also for intelligent species like humans. 

To test this hypothesis, Kipping created 4 statistical models of planets with different land fractions that intelligent aliens could potentially evolve on. First, he created an equation to describe the likelihood that a planet in its star’s habitable zone has a particular land fraction, known as a probability distribution. Kipping weighted this probability distribution toward the extreme ends, making it more likely that a planet would be covered by a single huge landmass or a single vast ocean than by a mix of both, as on Earth. 

Kipping then incorporated this land fraction probability distribution into his statistical models to calculate the probability that a random planet will have that land fraction and host intelligent life. The 4 scenarios Kipping tested were: 1) that intelligent life is more likely to emerge on land-dominated planets, 2) that it’s more likely to emerge on ocean-dominated planets, 3) that it’s more likely to emerge on planets with roughly equal amounts of land and ocean, and 4) that its emergence is independent of a planet’s land fraction. 

As a first step in determining the kinds of planets intelligent aliens would tend to emerge on, Kipping used each model to predict the probability that intelligent life would emerge on a planet with the same land fraction as Earth. He then compared these probabilities by calculating the ratios between each value. Because Earth is the only known planet with intelligent life, a model that predicted a greater probability for humanity’s existence on Earth would be more likely to reflect reality.

Kipping considered it strong evidence that a given model was more realistic than another if the ratio between 2 of them was greater than 10, meaning one model was 10 times more likely to predict the existence of Earth and humanity. Kipping found that no comparison of any 2 models passed this threshold. However, the models assuming that intelligent life prefers ocean-dominated planets or planets with a land-ocean balance were 2.5 and 3 times more likely to predict the existence of humanity than the model assuming that intelligent life prefers land-dominated planets. Additionally, the model assuming that intelligent life prefers a land-ocean balance was always more likely to predict humanity than any other model, though marginally. 

Kipping also addressed whether finding more planets with intelligent life would affect which model was deemed most realistic, for example, if scientists discovered conclusive evidence of life on Mars in its distant past. Here, Kipping identified 2 complications. First, it’s uncertain how much of Mars’s surface was once covered by water – some estimate it had a land fraction as high as 81%, while others estimate it was as low as 25%. Second, proving that Mars once had life would not prove it once had intelligent life.

Regardless, Kipping reran the models assuming that ancient Mars had a land fraction comparable to Earth’s. Adding this second data point produced ratios similar to those in the earlier Earth-only calculations, meaning it still didn’t make any single model 10 times more likely to predict the existence of humans and Martians, respectively. 

Kipping then took the 10-times threshold and reversed the calculations to find what conditions would exceed it. In doing so, he calculated that astronomers would need to find 14 other planets with intelligent life and known land fractions to robustly determine whether intelligent life is more likely to occur on desert planets, ocean planets, balanced planets, or without bias.

Kipping concluded that he can’t yet definitively state whether there is something special about Earth’s land fraction when it comes to producing intelligent species. However, Earth’s existence would suggest that intelligent life is unlikely to favor extreme desert planets, so the Milky Way probably isn’t filled with Tatooines and Jakkus. And while his analysis doesn’t debunk the Rare Earth hypothesis, it does undermine the argument that Earth’s ocean size explains why Earth is rare. 

The post Is Earth’s water why intelligent life evolved here? appeared first on Sciworthy.