Astronomers have discovered a dormant supermassive black hole 30,000 light-years from the center of WISEA J014656.04-152214.7 -- a massive galaxy located about 750 million light-years away in the constellation of Cetus -- after it briefly lit up by tearing apart a star.

The post Astronomers Spot Wandering Supermassive Black Hole Far From Its Galaxy’s Heart appeared first on Sci.News: Breaking Science News.

Editor’s Note: Astrobites is a graduate-student-run organization that digests astrophysical literature for undergraduate students. As part of the partnership between the AAS and astrobites, we occasionally repost astrobites content here at AAS Nova. We hope you enjoy this post from astrobites; the original can be viewed at astrobites.org.

Title: The Wandering Supermassive Black Hole Powering the Off-Nuclear Tidal Disruption Event AT2024tvd
Authors: M. Guolo et al.
First Author’s Institution: Johns Hopkins University
Status: Published in ApJL

A Star Gets Eaten in the Wrong Neighborhood

We find supermassive black holes at the centers of most large galaxies. They end up there because of how galaxies form: as matter collapses and merges over time, material sinks to the gravitational center, and the black hole settles in.

So, what happens when we catch a star being ripped apart by a supermassive black hole that is not at the center of its galaxy?

That is exactly the puzzle posed by AT2024tvd, a tidal disruption event (TDE) spotted roughly 2,600 light-years from the center of a massive galaxy located 600 million light-years away from us (see Figure 1).

We see TDEs when a black hole tears apart a star that gets too close to it. It happens because the black hole’s gravity pulls harder on the near side of the star than the far side, stretching the star until it comes apart. The stellar debris then forms a hot accretion disk, a ring of material swirling around the black hole that spirals inward and releases a burst of electromagnetic energy across many wavelengths — from visible light to X-rays. These events are valuable to astronomers because they briefly light up black holes that would otherwise be invisible, giving us a rare window to measure their properties. Since supermassive black holes live at galactic centers, that is also where we expect TDEs to happen, which makes a TDE found away from a galactic center rare and puzzling. The galactic center is often called the nucleus of a galaxy, so astronomers refer to these displaced events as “off-nuclear” TDEs. AT2024tvd is only the third known off-nuclear TDE, and this research article makes a strong case that it is the most remarkable one yet.

Measuring Mass Using Light

To figure out the mass of the black hole responsible for AT2024tvd, the authors needed to get creative. You cannot weigh a black hole directly, so astronomers have to work backward from what they can see. The key idea is that a black hole’s mass controls how its accretion disk behaves. A more massive black hole produces a larger, cooler disk, while a less massive one produces a smaller, hotter disk. By measuring how bright the disk is at different wavelengths and how hot it gets, you can figure out how massive the black hole must be.

The authors did this by modeling the light the event produced across many wavelengths. They combined data from several telescopes: the Zwicky Transient Facility, the Neil Gehrels Swift Observatory, Pan-STARRS, and two rounds of high-quality X-ray data from XMM-Newton. TDE light curves go through different phases. The early flare in visible and ultraviolet light is bright but complicated, and the physical processes behind it are not fully understood. But after a few hundred days, TDEs settle into a quieter “plateau phase,” where the ultraviolet and visible light come directly from the accretion disk. At this stage, the emission follows well-understood physics, and astronomers can model it reliably.

The authors used a model called kerrSED, which describes the spectral energy distribution (SED) of a spinning black hole’s accretion disk (kerr). It accounts for the disk’s temperature, its physical size, the black hole’s spin (how fast it rotates), and the angle at which we are viewing the system. It also accounts for a process called Comptonization, where hot electrons near the black hole boost lower-energy photons (particles of light) up to X-ray energies. By fitting this model to the observed light at multiple wavelengths simultaneously, the authors could pin down the disk properties and extract the black hole mass. The result was a clean fit: the disk model alone could explain all the observed light during the plateau phase, with nothing significant left over (see Figure 2).

Not an Intermediate, but a Supermassive Black Hole

From their fit, the authors found a black hole mass of about one million solar masses. Black holes above about 100,000 solar masses are considered supermassive, while those below that threshold but above about 100 solar masses are called intermediate-mass black holes. So, this puts AT2024tvd in the supermassive category. This matters because the two previously known off-nuclear TDEs, called 3XMM J2150-05 and EP240222a, were both powered by intermediate-mass black holes. Those black holes were found inside small, dense collections of stars called ultra-compact dwarf galaxies that were orbiting larger host galaxies.

AT2024tvd is different. When the authors looked at deep images of the location where the TDE happened, they found no star cluster or small galaxy there. Whatever group of stars once surrounded this black hole has been almost entirely pulled apart by the gravity of the much larger parent galaxy. The ratio of the black hole’s mass to the mass of any remaining stars around it is extreme: greater than 3%, which is far above what we normally see. This is the signature of a “wandering” supermassive black hole, one that was brought in during a past galaxy merger and has been slowly sinking toward the center of its new host ever since, losing its surrounding stars along the way.

The authors compared AT2024tvd to other TDEs using established relationships between accretion disk properties and black hole mass (Figure 3). In terms of its disk temperature, luminosity, and inferred mass, AT2024tvd behaves like a typical nuclear TDE powered by a supermassive black hole. However, when placed on the black hole mass versus host stellar mass relation, it stands out as a strong outlier. The black hole mass is far too large for the small amount of surrounding stellar mass detected at its location.

The Big Picture

This discovery matters for several reasons. It shows that off-nuclear TDEs are not limited to intermediate-mass black holes sitting in small satellite galaxies. Some are powered by fully supermassive black holes that have been displaced from their original galactic centers. It also shows that TDE modeling, when done carefully during the plateau phase of the light curve (when the emission is dominated by well-understood accretion disk physics), can provide reliable black hole masses on its own, without assuming any relationship between the black hole and its host galaxy. This is particularly important for wandering black holes, where those relationships do not apply.

Looking ahead, upcoming surveys like Vera C. Rubin Observatory’s Legacy Survey of Space and Time are expected to find many more off-nuclear TDEs. Combined with X-ray follow-up from telescopes like XMM-Newton, these events could become our main tool for mapping out the population of displaced black holes in the nearby universe. One disrupted star at a time, we are starting to find black holes that theory told us should exist but that had, until now, stayed hidden.

Original astrobite edited by Kelsie Taylor and Veronika Dornan.

About the author, Serat Saad:

Serat is a first-year PhD student in astronomy at The Ohio State University. His research is on stellar and galactic dynamics, where he uses observational data to understand gravity. He also has interests in active galactic nuclei and tidal disruption events.

The post A Wandering Supermassive Black Hole Eating a Star appeared first on AAS Nova.

Catastrophic encounters between stars and massive black holes usually take place in the nuclei of galaxies, but not always. Researchers recently reported on the brightest-ever radio emission from an off-nuclear tidal disruption event caused by a wandering or recoiling black hole.

Signature of a Roaming Black Hole

Tidal disruption events occur when a star ventures too close to a massive black hole. The tidal forces of the black hole stretch the star until it’s partially or entirely disrupted, sometimes causing jets or outflows to spray from the shredded star. One thing that often distinguishes a tidal disruption event from the sea of other possible transients is the location, close to the nucleus of a galaxy.

But not all tidal disruption events happen in the center of a galaxy. In rare cases, a massive black hole roaming elsewhere in a galaxy may encounter a star, sending out a tell-tale signal in an unexpected location.

One such event is AT 2024tvd, which was discovered at optical wavelengths by the Zwicky Transient Facility. Though the initial identification placed it at the center of its host galaxy, follow-up observations suggested that it was in fact 2,600 light years from the center. What can radio observations tell us about this rare off-center event?

Radio Reconnaissance

Less than three months after AT 2024tvd was discovered, Itai Sfaradi (University of California, Berkeley) and collaborators launched a months-long radio-wavelength observing campaign using the Very Large Array, the Atacama Large Millimeter/submillimeter Array, the Arcminute Microkelvin Imager Large Array, the Allen Telescope Array, and the Submillimeter Array. Radio observations are critical for investigating jets and outflows from tidal disruption events.

The observations, which spanned centimeter and millimeter wavelengths, revealed two emission peaks from the tidal disruption event. The first peak occurred roughly 131 days after the event was discovered, and the second followed at day 194.

About 40% of the tidal disruption events that have been identified at optical wavelengths show this kind of delayed brightening at radio wavelengths, but AT 2024tvd stands out as having the fastest radio evolution ever seen. Even among fairly fast-evolving flares, AT 2024tvd is unusual, having a brighter second peak than peer events.

Prompt or Delayed, Outflow or Jet?

To understand the origin of the fast-evolving, extremely bright radio emission from AT 2024tvd, Sfaradi’s team modeled the emission that would arise from outflows and jets. For both wide-angle outflows and narrow jets, the team considered both prompt — arising simultaneously with the event’s optical detection — and delayed sources.

The team’s modeling highlighted several possible scenarios. In the first, both bright radio peaks arose from a single outflow that was launched about 84 days after the star met its doom. The double-peaked behavior is due to the outflow interacting with a complex distribution of material surrounding the black hole. It’s also possible for the two peaks to arise from separate outflows or jets, one launched around 84 days and the other around either 170 or 190 days, depending on whether the second source is a mildly relativistic outflow or a relativistic jet.

Sfaradi and collaborators posited that AT 2024tvd’s unusual radio behavior could be due to its off-nuclear location, but they acknowledged that this event might simply occupy a region of tidal disruption event parameter space that had yet to be explored. Sensitive interferometric or polarimetric observations may reveal more about how AT 2024tvd interacts with its environment, helping to illuminate the nature of this rare event.

Citation

“The First Radio-Bright Off-Nuclear TDE 2024tvd Reveals the Fastest-Evolving Double-Peaked Radio Emission,” Itai Sfaradi et al 2025 ApJL 992 L18. doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ae0a26

The post Investigation of the First Radio-Bright Off-Nuclear Tidal Disruption Event appeared first on AAS Nova.

Simulations suggest that there should be a million stars in our galaxy that once wandered so close to a supermassive black hole that they were nearly destroyed. What are the long-term effects of this encounter, and could astronomers observe the scars of these near-death experiences?

Moths to a Flame

The center of our galaxy is a dangerous place to be a star. Like mosquitoes drawn to a light, millions of stars swarm around the supermassive black hole named Sagittarius A*, packing themselves in tight and kicking one another onto wild, eccentric, and ever-changing orbits. Every 100,000 years or so, one of these stars gets an unlucky push and finally gives in to the black hole’s irresistible pull. A nudge from a neighbor will send it hurtling beyond the point of safety, and in one intense flyby, it’ll be ripped apart by Sagittarius A*’s immense gravitational field.

Simulations suggest that most of the time, these hapless stars are not completely destroyed by their close encounters with the black hole. In principle, then, there should be about a million “survivor” stars wandering near the center of our galaxy. But, what would these survivors look like? And with careful measurements, could we tell them apart from their regular, unscathed counterparts?

Simulating a Star’s Worst Day

Recently, a team of astronomers led by Rewa Clark Bush (University of California Santa Cruz, Cabrillo College, Wesleyan University) tackled this question. First, the team needed to simulate a terrible day for a hypothetical star: the day it passes closest to the black hole. To compute what happens to the star in those intense couple of hours, they used an open-source hydrodynamic code called FLASH to track the state of the star in granular detail.

Then, once the star (or what was left of it) managed to flee back to safety, the team froze the simulations and took stock. They found that depending on the initial size of the star and the distance of its closest approach, the black hole stripped away anywhere from a few percent to almost two thirds of the star’s mass. The researchers then fed the stars into another code called MESA to simulate how the disturbed stars would settle into a new equilibrium and evolve over billions of years.

Back on Track

The team found that although these unlucky stars likely glow tens to hundreds of times brighter than usual after their flyby, this period of enhanced brightness lasts less than 100,000 years. For our galaxy, this translates to 1–10 stars currently in the galactic center that have been brightened by an encounter with a supermassive black hole.

Eventually, though, these stars pretty much return to a new normal. Though these stars would have had slightly different colors and luminosities had they not encountered the black hole, they end up looking similar to undisturbed stars with the same final mass.

Although detailed spectroscopic measurements of these remnants might reveal a strange composition thanks to all the stirring that happened during the flyby, it’d be hard to tell anything happened to these stars otherwise. Ultimately, life goes on, even for stars that were nearly destroyed by the most massive creature in the galaxy.

Citation

“Black Hole Survival Guide: Searching for Stars in the Galactic Center that Endure Partial Tidal Disruption,” Rewa Clark Bush et al 2025 ApJL 990 L7. doi:10.3847/2041-8213/adefde

The post Scars from a Black Hole appeared first on AAS Nova.

Falling into a supermassive black hole will leave a star mangled and destroyed but not without a fiery end. A recent study explores an intriguing case, uncovering new possibilities for stars lost to black hole bites.

Tidal Disruption Events

Invisible in light but strong in gravitational influence, some supermassive black holes reveal themselves when a star comes close enough to be ripped apart by the black hole’s tidal forces. This violent encounter produces a flare of radiation known as a tidal disruption event, allowing astronomers to explore the otherwise hidden properties of supermassive black holes and their influence on the material around them. 

Tidal disruption events vary depending on the properties of the host galaxy, the supermassive black hole, and the star itself. These events often appear as X-ray flares, but over the past decade, researchers have discovered a new class of optical-ultraviolet tidal disruption events. Emitting primarily in ultraviolet and optical wavelengths, these flares are significantly less energetic than predicted, leaving researchers wondering — what drives these disruptions?

Origins of AT 2022dbl

New detections of optical-ultraviolet tidal disruption events can provide insights into their origins, and one such discovery is particularly intriguing. AT 2022dbl first flared in 2022 and emitted a second, nearly identical flare 700 days later in 2024 — behavior uncommon among this class of tidal disruption events — raising many questions about AT 2022dbl’s origins. Did this supermassive black hole perhaps capture two unrelated stars? Is this actually the same flare seen twice due to gravitational lensing? Could a single star have survived the first flare only to be disrupted again?

Lydia Makrygianni (Lancaster University) and collaborators performed follow-up imaging and spectroscopy of AT 2022dbl to probe how the two flares compare to each other and to other observations of optical-ultraviolet tidal disruption events. With these observations and detailed analysis, the team determined that gravitational lensing, the tidal disruption of two separate stars, and even the possibility of a hidden binary companion to the supermassive black hole slurping up some stellar crumbs each cannot account for the two flares of AT 2022dbl.

Ultimately, the authors concluded that the two flares of AT 2022dbl are related to the same star, leaving two possibilities. First, loose debris from the initial flare bound to a tidal tail around the black hole could have ignited the second flare; however, the authors found that there would not be enough loose material bound to the black hole to produce the bright second flare. Rather, the second and likeliest explanation is two repeated disruptions of the same star.

Disrupting Expectations

Assuming that the two tidal disruption events are from the same star, this implies that the first flare was a partial disruption, removing only some material without destroying the star entirely. The second flare could be a complete disruption or another partial disruption, but observations of a third flare in 2026 would be necessary to confirm this. 

Other optical-ultraviolet tidal disruption events appear similar to the flares of AT 2022dbl, and these have generally been assumed to be complete disruptions. With the discovery and classification of AT 2022dbl, the similar optical-ultraviolet tidal disruption events could also be partial disruptions, with their second flares on longer timescales yet to be observed. Future observations of optical-ultraviolet tidal disruption events are required to further understand the mechanisms driving them, and this study opens up new possibilities to consider. 

Citation

“The Double Tidal Disruption Event AT 2022dbl Implies that at Least Some ‘Standard’ Optical Tidal Disruption Events Are Partial Disruptions,” Lydia Makrygianni et al 2025 ApJL 987 L20. doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ade155

The post Double Disruption Dilemma: Exploring the Tidal Disruption Events of AT 2022dbl appeared first on AAS Nova.

When JWST peered back into the early universe, its keen eyes revealed an unexpected population of galaxies nicknamed “little red dots” for their compact size and bright red hue. A new research article proposes that tidal disruption events could be responsible for the surprising appearance of these galaxies.

Galactic Surprises

Using JWST, researchers have discovered more than 300 little red dots. Most of these galaxies are concentrated around when the universe was 600 million years old, though they’ve been spotted out to about 1.6 billion years after the Big Bang. But why do these galaxies look the way they do? Do they host enormous, active black holes, as many researchers suspect? Do they get their characteristic red color from a population of old, evolved stars? Or could rapid, dust-shrouded star formation be the cause?

A successful theory of little red dot identity must account for several observed properties: “V”-shaped spectra, broad H-alpha lines, and little or no emission at X-ray wavelengths. In a recent research article, Jillian Bellovary (Queensborough Community College; CUNY Graduate Center; American Museum of Natural History) has theorized that little red dots get their curious characteristics from stars being torn apart by a young and growing black hole.

A New Hypothesis

In this scenario, little red dots arise in the extremely dense star clusters created in the early universe. Because of their extraordinary density, these star clusters are vulnerable to gravitational collapse, causing the packed-together stars to crash into one another. The colliding stars combine to form a supermassive star that collapses, leaving behind an intermediate-mass black hole — a seed that could someday grow into a supermassive black hole.

Situated at the center of a dense star cluster, an intermediate-mass black hole would be poised to ensnare stars in its gravitational web, pulling the stars apart with its powerful tidal forces and stealing their mass. These star-shredding events are known as tidal disruption events.

Simulations predict that in the era during which little red dots have been observed, a cubic megaparsec should contain about 0.3–1 intermediate-mass black holes. (These intermediate-mass black holes could arise through the cluster collapse scenario outlined above, or through other pathways like the collapse of the first stars in the universe.) Observations show roughly 10,000 fewer little red dots in this same volume.

Because tidal disruption events tend to remain bright for about a year, this implies that a tidal disruption event rate of one per 10,000 years is necessary for tidal disruption events to explain little red dots.

Matching Predictions

Using analytic and numerical models, Bellovary showed that this tidal disruption event rate is reasonable for intermediate-mass black holes with masses between 1,000 and 100,000 solar masses. But would tidal disruption events provide a match for other little red dot characteristics? Tidal disruption events tend to be faint at X-ray wavelengths and sport broad H-alpha lines, much like little red dots. Another plus is that unlike in the active black hole scenario, the H-alpha emission from a tidal disruption event doesn’t scale with the mass of the black hole; this means that black holes categorized as over-massive based on the strength of their H-alpha emission may not be over-massive after all. One drawback of the tidal disruption event scenario is that it doesn’t necessarily predict the characteristic red color of a little red dot; this color might come from the galaxy’s stars instead.

As Bellovary notes, little red dots could have multiple causes. Some might be due to tidal disruption events, while others could contain active black holes, ancient populations of red stars, or dusty starburst galaxies, as others have suggested.

To verify the tidal disruption event hypothesis, astronomers would need to find evidence for time variability at rest-frame ultraviolet wavelengths, as well as a characteristic decrease in brightness over time. These changes are expected to unfold over the course of years or decades, meaning that while observations may settle this question in due time, there will be plenty of time to ponder the mysteries of little red dots while we wait.

Citation

“Little Red Dots Are Tidal Disruption Events in Runaway-Collapsing Clusters,” Jillian Bellovary 2025 ApJL 984 L55. doi:10.3847/2041-8213/adce6c

The post A New Theory for Little Red Dots: Shredded Stars Feeding Growing Black Holes appeared first on AAS Nova.

Editor’s Note: Astrobites is a graduate-student-run organization that digests astrophysical literature for undergraduate students. As part of the partnership between the AAS and astrobites, we occasionally repost astrobites content here at AAS Nova. We hope you enjoy this post from astrobites; the original can be viewed at astrobites.org.

Title: An Untargeted Search for Radio-Emitting Tidal Disruption Events in the VAST Pilot Survey
Authors: Hannah Dykaar et al.
First Author’s Institution: University of Toronto
Status: Published in ApJ

The supermassive black holes in the centers of most galaxies are notoriously, and predictably, violent actors in the universe. While some, classified as active galactic nuclei, act like a drain on their host galaxies, swallowing anything and everything that falls into them, even dormant black holes will react destructively when provoked. Orbit too closely, and any galactic nucleus will break you apart like a first-year chemistry student bumping an unsuspecting beaker off the lab bench.

If an ill-fated star falls into a black hole, the system will briefly glow across the electromagnetic spectrum. When and where these mishaps, known as tidal disruption events (TDEs, shown in Figure 1), occur, as well as the exact physical processes causing the brief glow, are not well understood. TDEs have been detected overwhelmingly in galaxies that do not have active galactic nuclei and are calming down after an era of intense star formation, and current models of the TDE occurrence rate disagree with observations. We expect to see more types of galaxies, such as those with active galactic nuclei, that host TDEs at similar rates, but we don’t — however, we might just be looking in the wrong places, or rather, with the wrong set of eyes.

Traditionally, TDEs have been identified by their optical, ultraviolet, or X-ray emission, but active galactic nuclei are surrounded by dust, which absorbs light at these wavelengths on its way to us. However, at radio wavelengths, the issue of dust obscuration fades, allowing us to uncover the TDEs that may be hiding. While radio emission has been observed from known TDEs, identifying TDEs in the radio comes with a major hurdle, presented by the pesky active galactic nuclei themselves; they are famously variable in radio emission, and they can serve as pretty convincing TDE imposters.

Searching for TDEs at Radio Wavelengths

Today’s authors decide to take on this challenge, armed with data from the Variable and Slow Transients (VAST) pilot survey, which observes large swaths of the sky at regular intervals to track variability on the order of days to months. VAST is optimized for observing TDEs, but unfortunately, it is also excellent at finding active galactic nuclei. How do we know what to look for, and how can we distinguish a TDE from an active galactic nucleus? Easy, we can just identify characteristics common to all the known radio-emitting TDEs in the VAST field of view — all one of them, that is. Surely, that won’t do. Instead, our authors simulate the evolution of TDEs as seen by VAST, which can only catch discrete snapshots of light at a specific radio wavelength. Their models of TDE radio emission assume one of three cases: either the TDE produces a relativistic jet directed at us (on-axis), directed away from us (off-axis), or none at all. The presence or absence of a jet, and its direction, determine the shape of the light curve, as shown in Figure 2.

From these simulations, the authors identify three overarching characteristics that wannabe TDEs must exhibit: first, they must be variable, signaling the flare of activity as the star crashes into the black hole; second, the flare should be sufficiently bright compared to the galaxy’s normal brightness; and third, the flare must last for more than one observation, to ensure it is not a spurious detection. Additionally, the authors find that the peak brightness of the TDE must be double the typical galaxy brightness to effectively rule out active galactic nucleus imposters, which do not tend to vary this drastically, as shown in Figure 3. Lastly, the TDE must actually occur near the center of a galaxy (the black hole locale), as confirmed by optical or infrared survey catalogs. In the VAST pilot survey, 12 sources meet these criteria.

Following Up on TDE Candidates at Other Wavelengths

The authors next subject these TDE candidates to thorough multi-wavelength scrutiny using archival survey data. First, they investigated whether the candidates are associated with gamma-ray bursts, which are extremely luminous and energetic events that may accompany TDEs. Unfortunately, gamma rays are easily absorbed, making them notoriously difficult to trace back to their sources. (After all, the journey of a gamma ray through light-years of dust and gas to Earth is not unlike Odysseus’s return to Ithaca, and we all know how many made that journey unscathed.)

The authors found that all 12 sources were coincident with a gamma-ray burst, but all 12 sources were also coincident with multiple gamma-ray bursts (which is unlikely to be physical), as were randomized, TDE-free regions of the VAST sky. In other words, the gamma-ray burst association is inconclusive. Contemporary optical and infrared observations of the candidates revealed no corresponding flares, which leads to more questions. Are the sources simply too far away for their optical and infrared flares to be discernible, or could dust absorption be at play? Additionally, nearly all candidates maintained an increased radio flux after the TDE flare. This may indicate that the TDE occurred within an active galactic nucleus as it was transitioning to a higher radio flux state, that the TDE was followed by intense star formation, or both.

By comparing their candidates to the expected observational manifestations of their TDE models, the authors conclude that the candidate sources are consistent with TDEs that have relativistic jets. They also independently constrain the TDE incidence rate, which agrees with current theory. As our window into the variable radio universe expands with future observations, such as with the ongoing VAST survey, we will have a growing population of such radio-detected TDEs to study, and the ability to distinguish them from regular active galactic nuclei will be ever more valuable in our quest to understand them.

About the author, Chloe Klare:

I’m a PhD student in Astronomy and Astrophysics at Penn State, with a physics doctoral minor. In my research, I’m looking for newly evolving synchrotron jets in active galactic nuclei (in the radio!).

The post Did That Supermassive Black Hole Rip Apart a Star, or Is It Eating Lunch Like Normal? appeared first on AAS Nova.