This image of the galactic center from the MeerKAT radio array shows wispy vertical lines known as galactic non-thermal filaments. These structures, which are tens of parsecs long and less than a tenth of a parsec wide, are found throughout a complex region called the central molecular zone. The filaments’ radio emission appears to come from charged particles spiraling around magnetic field lines, but it’s not yet known where the speeding particles that power this emission come from. Recently, Mohan Richter-Addo (University of Wisconsin–Madison) and collaborators used magnetohydrodynamics simulations to explore two potential sources: 1) the electron–positron winds of a pulsar or 2) a proton-rich mix of particles accelerated by interstellar shocks. The team found few discernible differences between simulated filaments illuminated by these two sources, but this work provided new avenues for future exploration. One facet that emerged from the team’s investigation is that filaments should grow longer as they age, with the maximum length set by the underlying magnetic field. This suggests that magnetohydrodynamic turbulence might play a role in shaping the filaments. To learn more about this exploration of galactic non-thermal filaments, be sure to check out the article linked below.

Citation

“The Effects of Cosmic-Ray Protons on Galactic Nonthermal Filaments,” Mohan Richter-Addo et al 2026 ApJ 1009 164. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aea0c7

The post Featured Image: Examining Galactic Filaments appeared first on AAS Nova.

Editor’s Note: Astrobites is a graduate-student-run organization that digests astrophysical literature for undergraduate students. As part of the partnership between the AAS and astrobites, we occasionally repost astrobites content here at AAS Nova. We hope you enjoy this post from astrobites; the original can be viewed at astrobites.org.

Title: Discovery of the Distant, Ultra-Faint Milky Way Satellite Aquarius IV with the Vera C. Rubin Observatory Early Data Preview 2
Authors: William Cerny et al.
First Author’s Institution: Yale University
Status: Published in RNAAS

Warming Up the World’s Largest Camera

Today’s bite covers one of the NSF–DOE Vera C. Rubin Observatory‘s first major discoveries, which was found in testing data before the observatory began its decade of observations. Perched atop a mountain in Chile, the brand-new Rubin Observatory is just beginning a 10-year survey called the Legacy Survey of Space and Time (LSST). LSST will be the deepest and widest sky survey ever conducted, taking images of the entire southern night sky every three nights. This ultra-wide, ultra-high-definition time-lapse of the universe will help answer fundamental questions about dark matter and dark energy, study objects in our solar system, find distant supernova explosions, and more.

LSST is a photometric survey, meaning its main data product is images in several filters. These images are taken with the largest digital camera ever constructed, about the size of a Mini Cooper. The LSST camera has a resolution of 3.2 gigapixels. To put that number into perspective, you would need about 13 copies of the Las Vegas Sphere to display just a single LSST image… and hundreds of these images will be taken every night!

The authors of today’s article use the first dataset from the LSST camera, called Early Data Preview 2 (EDP2). EDP2 was taken from April 2025 to January 2026, covered about 3,000 square degrees (about 7% of the entire night sky), and primarily served as a test before beginning the 10-year LSST (which began in June 2026).

Small Galaxies, Big Questions

Since LSST will survey a large area at unprecedented depths, one field of interest is to study extremely dim and small galaxies called ultra-faint dwarf galaxies (UFDs). These galaxies are so faint that we can only find them close to home, orbiting the Milky Way and other nearby galaxies as satellites. UFDs don’t have much luminous matter, meaning they are likely dominated by their dark matter halos. This makes them useful test beds for our theories of dark matter and galaxy formation, if we can spot them.

Many UFDs don’t look like normal galaxies that resemble blobs of diffuse light with stars; instead, they’re more like a handful of individual stars in an image that also contains foreground stars and background galaxies. So how do you identify them? The trick is that stars born together at the same time from the same gas follow a predictable track in color and brightness called an isochrone. The authors slide a model isochrone for an ancient, metal-poor population through the data at a range of assumed distances and ask: at any spot in EDP2, are there more stars sitting on that track than random chance would predict? Cerny and coauthors found a new spot, which they call Aquarius IV, a new UFD candidate (Figure 1).

Aquarius IV had not been identified previously by any other observatory. However, the authors combed through data from LSST’s predecessor (the Dark Energy Survey, which concluded taking data in 2019) and found previously missed evidence that supports their discovery, namely an excess of faint, blue, marginally resolved stars. As a sanity check, they confirm that all previously known UFDs within the EDP2 footprint (Sagittarius II, Aquarius II, Aquarius III, and Virgo III) are also detected using their methods.

The authors also infer several properties of Aquarius IV, including its centroid coordinates, half-light radius, ellipticity, distance, and absolute magnitude. They find that its radius is larger than almost all Milky Way globular clusters (tight gravitationally bound systems of old stars that don’t reside in their own dark matter halos), suggesting that Aquarius IV is a true dwarf galaxy.

Currently, there are about 40 known UFDs around the Milky Way, and LSST is expected to roughly double this number (see this Astrobite), allowing us to study these tiny galaxies at a population level. This article proves that LSST has the potential to revolutionize many areas of astrophysics! If you are a researcher in the US or Chile and want to play with the EDP2 data yourself, you can access it via the Rubin Science Platform. For researchers from other countries, see more info here.

Original astrobite edited by Katya Gozman.

About the author, Ben Sherwin:

I am a physics PhD student and NSF Graduate Research Fellow at Stanford University. I am interested in theoretical and observational cosmology, specifically in cross-correlations between the cosmic microwave background and tracers of large-scale structure. Outside of work, I enjoy seeing the latest movies in theaters and exploring the San Francisco Bay Area.

The post An Early Discovery by Rubin Observatory appeared first on AAS Nova.

The stellar gathering known as Garro 04 belongs to a growing number of enigmatic groupings that combine traits of young open clusters ancient globulars.

The post Meet the Star Cluster That Defies Conventions appeared first on Sky & Telescope.

Carbon is the 4th most abundant element in the universe. It’s everywhere, from the air you breathe to the carbohydrates in your food to the petroleum in the Earth’s crust. Like most elements, carbon was not created by the Big Bang, but came from 2 different types of stars that fuse lighter elements together. 

Massive stars at least 8 times the Sun’s mass fuse 3 helium atoms into a carbon atom in their cores, through a mechanism called the triple-alpha process. They eventually expel this carbon into space, either through a stream of material called a stellar wind or at the end of their lives during a core-collapse supernova. 

Meanwhile, low-to-intermediate-sized stars between ½ and 8 times the Sun’s mass also induce the triple-alpha process. But unlike massive stars, they produce carbon not in their cores, but in a dense shell of helium that surrounds them during an advanced stage known as the asymptotic giant branch or AGB. AGB stars undergo cycles of swelling and contraction, during which they shed some of their material into space.

While scientists understand these processes, the contribution of each star type to the carbon supply in the universe remains uncertain. To address this, a team of scientists modeled how the chemical elements in the Milky Way Galaxy change over time with different contributions from the 2 carbon-creating processes. They then verified their findings by comparing them with the actual carbon concentration in the Milky Way.

To obtain the benchmark for the Milky Way Galaxy’s carbon content, the team turned to the catalog of stars observed by the Apache Point Observatory Galactic Evolution Experiment (APOGEE) survey. They selected 14,066 stars that were large and bright enough to yield reliable data but, unlike AGB and massive stars, were still at a stage of life when their newly produced carbon was still confined to their cores. The researchers used the carbon in the outer layers of these stars, known as subgiants, as a compositional record of the gas from which they formed, thereby estimating the Galaxy’s carbon content during their formation. 

The scientists started with a computer program developed by another team that models how the Milky Way’s chemistry changes over time. First, the team calculated the potential amount of carbon produced by different types of stars using estimates from earlier studies. Then, they incorporated these results into a model that accounts for how stars form, fuse elements, and release carbon into the Galaxy, using a simulation program called the Versatile Integrator for Chemical Evolution, or VICE. The researchers ran 14 versions of this model, each assuming a different contribution of carbon from AGB stars relative to massive stars.

In their computer model, the Milky Way Galaxy began as a set of 200 concentric rings, each containing its own population of stars, different speeds at which stars form, and varying amounts of gas available to form new stars. The team then stitched these rings together by having stars migrate between them. They allowed these model Galaxies to settle over 10 billion years, then picked a random sample of 14,066 simulated stars to compare their carbon content with carbon in the same number of observed subgiants from APOGEE.

The team’s model most closely reproduced the actual carbon content of the Milky Way’s subgiant stars when AGB stars contribute between 10% and 40% of the Galaxy’s carbon, with the strongest agreement occurring at 15% to 30%. Even though they found that massive stars are the dominant source of carbon, they also found that smaller AGB stars could produce carbon more efficiently than previously thought, though they take longer to become carbon sources than their larger counterparts.

The team concluded that their estimates of how much carbon comes from AGB and massive stars provide a benchmark for future studies, as the connection between the production of elements inside stars and the processes by which those same stars lose mass remains poorly understood. They suggested that future researchers analyze larger sample sizes, examine other galaxies, and use data from future surveys to better understand the chemical history of the universe.

The post Where did the galaxy get its carbon? appeared first on Sciworthy.

Astronomers have found new evidence that 3I/ATLAS, only the third confirmed interstellar object ever detected entering the Solar System from beyond, formed in an extremely cold environment far from any star.

The post Study: Interstellar Comet 3I/ATLAS Formed in Cold, Nitrogen-Rich Environment appeared first on Sci.News: Breaking Science News.

A cubic meter of lunar soil might be one of our best bets for finding physical proof that another advanced civilization once existed somewhere in the Milky Way, according to a new paper to be published in the International Journal of Astrobiology.

The post Could Scoop of Moon Dust Reveal Alien Technology? appeared first on Sci.News: Breaking Science News.

In the 1970s, astronomer Vera Rubin analyzed a series of observations of how quickly different galaxies rotated around their centers. She found that these galaxies rotated much faster than they should have, given the amount of material visible through starlight. She concluded that a large fraction of these galaxies’ masses must therefore consist of some kind of unseen material.

Scientists have since observed galaxies to more precisely measure this unseen material, which they now call dark matter. They’ve shown that dark matter moves much more slowly than the speed of light. Unlike most celestial objects, it can’t emit or block any light, meaning it doesn’t interact with the electromagnetic force. Even though it doesn’t interact with a fundamental force in the universe, dark matter constitutes over 80% of the mass of an average galaxy.

In the prevailing model of cosmology, known as ΛCDM (pronounced “Lambda-CDM”), dark matter determined where galaxies formed. The theory is that gravity pulled dark matter together more quickly than regular matter in the primordial universe. This redistribution led to regions of space with greater mass density, which collected chaotic, regular matter into pools that eventually formed galaxies, stars, and planets. 

In the present universe, dark matter and regular matter coexist in galaxies, though generally separated. Regular matter pools in the very center of galaxies, forming the more familiar galactic disks. Dark matter stays towards the edges of galaxies, enveloping the regular matter disks in what are known as dark matter halos. Because these halos make up so much of the mass of the average galaxy, researchers Guangze Sun, Fangzhou Jiang, and Jing Wang conducted a series of simulations to test how dark matter halos affect regular matter in galaxies. Specifically, they examined what characteristics of dark matter halos determine galaxy sizes. 

The force of gravity works such that more massive dark matter halos draw in more regular matter and produce larger galaxies. So these researchers fixed the total mass of the galaxies they simulated at 100 billion times that of the Sun to determine which properties of the dark matter halos would produce the widest galaxies. They selected 4 variables to test: the total density of dark matter in the galactic halo, the density of dark matter in the innermost 1% of the halo, how fast the halo spun, and the ratio of regular matter to dark matter in the entire galaxy. For each variable, they tested 3 to 4 inputs representing low, moderate, and high values against a standard reference value and ran 132 total simulations to generate enough data for statistical analyses.

To simulate the complex physics of dark matter halos, the team used the modeling software GIZMO to model gravity, magnetism, and fluid dynamics. They combined this with a second model, called FIRE-3, which modeled how stars explode at the end of their lives, how much metal these explosions produce, and how gases heat up and cool down over time. The researchers ran the dynamic simulations for 3 billion model years, then used a program they developed based on the existing Pynbody to measure the radii of the simulated galaxies. 

The team found that the faster a dark matter halo spun around a simulated galaxy, the larger the galaxy became, as shown in scenario 1 in the figure below. By contrast, in scenario 2, increasing the halo’s total dark matter concentration caused the central galaxy to shrink. Increasing only the innermost dark matter density in the halo had a smaller effect but generally reduced the galaxy’s size, as shown in scenario 3. And lastly, increasing the ratio of regular matter to dark matter in galaxies resulted in smaller galaxies that formed stars closer to their centers, as shown by a greater concentration of stars in scenario 4. 

The team’s results suggest a previously unknown connection between the properties of dark matter halos and galactic disks. However, they cautioned that their simulations were all run on galaxies in isolation, unlike in the actual ΛCDM universe, where their interactions are complicated by galaxies tugging on one another or by material moving from one to another. To further test their results for single galaxies, the researchers plan to run follow-up experiments with halos of different sizes, as well as with galaxies with different shapes and features, such as clumps, gaps, and lopsidedness.

The post Dark matter influences the size of galaxies appeared first on Sciworthy.

A new look at the heart of our Milky Way galaxy by Euclid, an ESA (European Space Agency)

Researchers have detected a sugar in the interstellar medium for the first time. Sugars are central to life. They help form the structural backbone of DNA and RNA and participate in essential metabolic reactions. They are also thought to have been necessary for the formation of the earliest nucleic acids. Yet researchers studying life’s origins [...]

Scientists have identified an accelerator that produces the highest-energy protons in our galaxy, a finding that could clarify the nature of the fast-moving particles filling the space between stars. Across the Milky Way, charged particles race through space with energies beyond the reach of even the most powerful accelerators built on Earth. Known as cosmic [...]

A head-on collision with another galaxy billions of years ago may have dramatically reoriented the Milky Way’s disk, according to new supercomputer simulations that reveal how violent mergers can leave spiral galaxies looking surprisingly normal today.

The post Our Milky Way Galaxy Likely Underwent Disk Flip after Ancient Galactic Collision: Study appeared first on Sci.News: Breaking Science News.

Observations of remote cosmic explosions reveal that the outer spiral arms of the Milky Way might extend farther out than previously thought.

The post Gamma-Ray Bursts Size Up the Milky Way’s Spiral Arms appeared first on Sky & Telescope.

The Milky Way galaxy's stunning arc is visible on moonless nights. Many of those stars are at vast distances, some over 50,000 light-years away. In Psalm 19 King David reflected on this cosmic splendour, interpreting the night sky as a declaration of God's creation. I explore its significance to the biblical creation worldview.

The iconic disks of spiral galaxies are well known across the local universe and now far beyond. A recent study looks at the Milky Way to determine when its own disk emerged.

Spinning into Spirals

The Milky Way, a grand spiral galaxy with stars and gas rotating in a disk, did not always look this way. Galaxies begin as chaotic clumps of gas and stars inside a knot of dark matter, and at some point in time, spiral galaxies must transform into the flat rotating disks we observe them as today. Recent JWST observations have uncovered disk galaxies emerging much earlier in the universe than previously thought, shifting our understanding of how quickly spiral galaxies come together and settle into disks. While we cannot study the detailed assembly history of these very distant galaxies, we can dissect galaxies in the local universe to build a better timeline of galaxy evolution.

Looking as close to home as possible, astronomers have used the kinematics and chemical makeup of stars in our own Milky Way to trace the moment when the galaxy started to host a rotating stellar disk. This period, known as the “spin-up,” marks when the bulk kinematic signature of the galaxy transitioned from one dominated by random motions to one dominated by a rotating disk.

Stars hold on to the kinematic and chemical information they are born with, so stars of different ages and metallicities across the galaxy should trace the development of the disk. Because stellar ages have been difficult to constrain observationally, studies of galactic spin-up have typically relied on readily available metallicity measurements as a proxy for age; however, metallicity is not a clear-cut age indicator, making it difficult to truly distinguish different stellar populations across the Milky Way’s disk. Luckily, new major surveys have recently provided stellar databases adding the stellar age measurements necessary to pin down when the Milky Way spun up.

Dawn of the Galactic Disk

Sofia Feltzing (Lund Observatory) and collaborators used a catalog of over 300,000 subgiant stars from the Large Sky Area Multi-Object Fiber Spectroscopic Telescope with metallicities, kinematics, and crucial stellar ages to determine when the Milky Way began to host a stellar disk. After making quality cuts to ensure they included only the most robustly measured stars, the authors divided the sample into two distinct stellar populations that settled into the Milky Way’s disk differently: older stars with a high abundance of α elements (like oxygen, magnesium, and silicon) relative to iron and younger stars with low α-element abundances.

With these star samples, Feltzing and team analyzed how both stellar rotational velocity and age varied with metallicity to determine when the Milky Way spun up. They found that high-α stars clearly move from having random motions to being rotationally supported over a short range of metallicities about 12.5 billion years ago, while the low-α stars seem to begin in a rotating disk and stay there. When varying their selection criteria and looking at the full sample, the authors determined that the Milky Way spin-up happened between 12.1 to 12.5 billion years ago — the first time Milky Way spin-up has been age-dated in this way.

These results imply a rapid chemical evolution and change in kinematic properties as stars went from randomly orbiting to rotating in an ordered disk in the Milky Way. The authors suggest that future studies should focus on lower-metallicity stars to better disentangle stars in the disk from stars in the halo, which will lead to a more precise determination of the Milky Way’s spin-up. Upcoming large-scale surveys will make this possible and allow astronomers to build a better picture of galaxy formation in the early universe.

Citation

“Dawn of the Milky Way Disk: Determination of When a Rotationally Supported Disk Appears and Dating the Spin-up of the Disk,” Sofia Feltzing et al 2026 ApJL 1004 L28. doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ae6f14

The post Dating the Dawn of the Milky Way Disk appeared first on AAS Nova.

Using the Yebes 40-m and IRAM 30-m radio telescopes, astronomers have discovered erythrulose, a four-carbon sugar commonly found in raspberries and sunless tanning cosmetics, in the molecular cloud G+0.693-0.027.

The post Astronomers Detect Sugar in Interstellar Space for First Time appeared first on Sci.News: Breaking Science News.

Do all star-forming regions birth stars with the same distribution of masses? Theory suggests that they do not, but researchers often assume they do for simplicity. Now, ultra-precise observations from Gaia have demonstrated that the initial mass function varies across star clusters in the Milky Way.

A Universal Initial Mass Function?

When a molecular cloud fragments, collapses, and births a star cluster, how many stars form, and what are their masses? The answer to that question is what astronomers term the initial mass function, or IMF: the distribution of masses of stars born in a cluster.

The IMF is important in many areas of astronomy, and it’s relied on especially heavily in studies of distant galaxies. The light from these galaxies is dominated by high-mass stars, with the emission from lower-mass stars lost in the glare, so astronomers must use the IMF to reconstruct the stellar populations of these far-off locales.

Though theory suggests that the IMF should vary with factors like temperature and metallicity, demonstrating these variations has been difficult, even within our own galaxy. Because of this, researchers often adopt a universal IMF drawn from observations of star clusters in the Milky Way. But is the IMF truly universal?

The More the Slope Changes, the More the Break Mass Stays the Same

Determining whether the IMF is universal is more complicated than simply comparing the stars in one cluster to those in another. That’s because what astronomers measure in present-day star clusters is not the initial mass function, but a version of the IMF that has been skewed by millions to billions of years of evolution; over time, high-mass stars die and low-mass stars get ejected, warping the shape of the mass function.

However, as demonstrated in a recent research article led by Charles L. Steinhardt (University of Missouri), certain aspects of the IMF may remain unchanged as clusters evolve. When the mass function of a star cluster is described using a broken power law (commonly called a “Kroupa-like” IMF in reference to work by Pavel Kroupa), the slopes of the power-law segments are affected by stellar evolution and dynamical interactions. Crucially, these effects appear not to alter the break mass — the mass at which the IMF transitions from one slope to another. Therefore, differences in the break mass from cluster to cluster reflect differences in the underlying IMF rather than the stellar and dynamical evolution of the clusters.

Insights from Gaia

Thanks to the Gaia spacecraft, which made precise observations of more than 2 billion stars in the Milky Way and beyond, it’s now possible to measure and compare the break masses of individual star clusters. Out of an initial catalog of 7,167 Milky Way clusters observed with Gaia, Steinhardt’s team selected just 110 that were of high enough quality and contained a sufficient number of stars to measure cluster break masses accurately.

The team found that the break mass differs considerably between the clusters in their sample, showing that the IMF is not universal. The observed variety of break masses appears to be linked to the age of the cluster, but instead of reflecting the impact of stellar and dynamical evolution — which have no effect on the break mass — these differences reflect the properties of the clouds in which the clusters were born. This implies that the properties of star-forming clouds in the Milky Way have, on average, changed over cosmic time. Thus, a star cluster that formed billions of years ago would have had a different IMF than one forming today.

This finding has implications for studies of high-redshift galaxies, where the properties of star-forming clouds are markedly different from those in the Milky Way. Going forward, Steinhardt and coauthors recommend developing a flexible parameterization of the IMF to capture how this critical function behaves in environments vastly different from our own.

Citation

“Direct Evidence for Stellar Initial Mass Function Variation in the Milky Way,” Charles L. Steinhardt et al 2026 ApJL 1005 L40. doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ae7444

The post Gaia Data Show That the Initial Mass Function Is Not Universal appeared first on AAS Nova.

Here's an observing guide to both familiar and lesser-known deep-sky objects that inhabit our galaxy's equatorial zone.

The post Steamy Nights at the Galactic Equator appeared first on Sky & Telescope.

Astronomers have underestimated just how bright the low-frequency radio sky is, new measurements show.

The post Radio Astronomers Measure a Brighter Sky Than They Expected appeared first on Sky & Telescope.

The interstellar comet 3I/ATLAS carries a chemical fingerprint unlike anything in our Solar System, and it may have formed 10 to 12 billion years ago, before our Sun even existed, according to two papers published in the journal Nature.

The post Interstellar Comet 3I/ATLAS Formed Up To 12 Billion Years Ago, New Observations Suggest appeared first on Sci.News: Breaking Science News.

The image above shows a newly discovered molecular cloud. This cloud was discovered through the Milky Way Imaging Scroll Painting project, which uses a 13.7-meter millimeter telescope to survey molecular clouds in our galaxy. Xuepeng Chen (Purple Mountain Observatory; University of Science and Technology of China) and collaborators came upon this cloud in survey data from a region of the Milky Way opposite the galactic center. The newfound cloud is roughly 5,400 light-years away, spans an area of 245 by 294 light-years, and contains an estimated 80,000 solar masses. The most remarkable feature of the cloud is its structure: it appears to have a central cavity, an elliptical disk-like body, and spiral arms. Chen’s team has suggested that the cloud owes its surprising structure to density wave theory — the same process thought to govern the formation of spiral arms in galaxies — but other possibilities such as collisions between molecular clouds can’t yet be ruled out. To learn more about the properties of this unusual molecular cloud, be sure to check out the full research article linked below.

Citation

“Discovery of a Giant Spiral Molecular Cloud in the Galactic Anticenter,” Xuepeng Chen et al 2026 AJ 172 4. doi:10.3847/1538-3881/ae6800

The post Featured Image: A Spiral Cloud in the Milky Way appeared first on AAS Nova.