Back when I used to commute to Physics World’s Bristol, UK offices every day, I heard a lot of excuses explanations for why my train was delayed. Missing crew members. Road vehicles colliding with bridges. Even, on one memorable occasion, a herd of cows blocking the tracks.

One explanation I never heard, though, was the one proposed for a train that supposedly left the south-west English city of Exeter at 10.05 p.m. on 18 October 1841. According to an anonymous correspondent in Nature some 30 years later, this 10.05 train was delayed by 16 minutes because of “a very intense magnetic disturbance” that made it “impossible to ascertain if the line was clear”. This disturbance, the correspondent argued, was due to “the magnetic and auroral storms that have of late excited some attention and discussion in these pages”.

Such storms are now known as space weather, and in 2013 Trey Cade, a physicist who leads the Space Weather Research Lab at Baylor University in the US, made an intriguing suggestion: was this supposed 1841 delay the first recorded example of space weather affecting human technology?

An auroral detective story

According to the latest research, the answer is firmly in line with Betteridge’s law, which states that any headline that ends in a question mark can be answered by the word “no”. Although space weather was (and is) capable of delaying trains, it couldn’t have delayed the 10.05 from Exeter in 1841 for a very simple reason: the railway line in that part of England didn’t open until 1846.

That, however, raises a further question. Assuming Nature’s correspondent wasn’t making up the story of the aurora-delayed train, was he perhaps misremembering the date of a different, later storm?

To find out, a broad group of experts led by Lancaster University’s Jim Wild, and including personnel from the British Geological Survey, Natural Resources Canada, Nature, RMIT University in Australia and STFC RAL Space in the UK as well as Cade himself – dug into the data. By combining evidence from railway timetables, historical newspapers, records of solar observations, reports of aurorae and digitized geomagnetic records, they concluded that Nature’s correspondent – whom they tentatively identified as an electrical engineer called Nathaniel John Holmes – was probably thinking of a storm that took place on 18 October 1848, not 1841.

Having debunked the 1841 hypothesis, the authors of the new research, which is published in Space Weather, say that the earliest known example of space weather impacting human technology is now an incident involving telegraph systems on England’s Midland Railway in March 1847. If that still sounds rather early, Wild says that’s the point. “Society has been experiencing the effects of space weather on technology for almost as long as electrical technologies have existed,” he says. “The technologies affected have evolved from railway telegraphs to satellites…but the challenge remains the same: understanding the risk and ensuring society is resilient to its impacts.”

Raising awareness

According to Lasse Clausen, who studies space weather at the University of Oslo, Norway, but was not involved in the 10.05 from Exeter study, the biggest barrier to this understanding is a shortage of data about what’s going on in the Earth’s ionosphere, where space weather occurs. Although our ability to detect space weather has improved since the 1840s, he says that when it comes to predicting it, we’re roughly where conventional weather forecasting was in the 1920s. “Essentially, we can look out the window and say whether it’s raining or not,” he says.

Changing that will require additional funding, and for that, Clausen thinks raising awareness is essential. “The ionosphere is useful, but it’s not very sexy,” he tells me. The new study, he adds, is “a nice piece of detective work” that “firmly belongs in the ‘awareness raising’ category”.

The post Did space weather delay a train in 1841? appeared first on Physics World.

Astronomers have found the best evidence yet for a companion star to Betelgeuse, the brightest star in the constellation Orion. Based on data obtained by the SPHERE instrument on the European Southern Observatory’s Very Large Telescope (VLT) in Chile, they say this companion may be responsible for the red supergiant star’s periodic changes in brightness, which have puzzled scientists for decades.

Betelgeuse is a red supergiant star located about 548 light-years away. As the 10th brightest star in the night sky, it is generally visible even in locations with substantial light pollution. However, its brightness varies over a period of roughly 420 days, superimposed on a longer 2200-day modulation.

For decades, astronomers have suspected that some of these variations could be caused by a companion star that modifies the distribution of cosmic dust that Betelgeuse produces and expels. These changes in cosmic dust would, in turn, change the amount of its light that reaches us here on Earth.

A few years ago, two studies (published in The Astrophysical Journal in 2024 and 2025, but available as preprints beforehand) predicted that in December 2024, this companion star would be at its greatest distance (maximum elongation) from Betelgeuse, making it easier to detect. To take advantage of this opportunity, researchers led by Miguel Montargès of the Observatoire de Paris – PSL, France, requested observing time on the VLT. Although the same studies predicted that the companion would not be massive enough to be detectable with current instrumentation, Montargès and colleagues nevertheless hoped to place upper limits on its stellar parameters.

A difficult analysis

The astronomers used the SPHERE instrument on the VLT to image light from the region where the companion was expected to be, followed by advanced post-processing techniques originally developed to search for exoplanets. Betelgeuse’s brightness and large angular size made this analysis difficult, explains Montargès, but he and his colleagues were nevertheless able to gather enough data to identify a “Betelbuddy” with a confidence of 6σ. As Montargès points out, this is better than the previous upper limit of 1.5σ reported by astronomers at NOIRlab in 2025, and above the usual 5σ threshold that constitutes an “observation” or “discovery”.

Despite this, the astronomers say that before they can be certain that they have really detected a companion that it is indeed gravitationally bound to Betelgeuse, they will need to perform additional observations next year. At that point, they will attempt to confirm the companion’s presence by observing it half a period after the initial detection, on the other side of the red supergiant. “We will then continue observing it to get a precise characterization of its orbit (semi-major axis, eccentricity and inclination, among other parameters),” Montargès says. “These will be required to understand the past and future evolution of the system.”

What happens next

As a mature supergiant star, Betelgeuse is expected to undergo a supernova explosion at some point. The presence of a companion star could affect how this process plays out, and even dictate when the eventual explosion occurs. “It is clear to me that this companion detection will now trigger a wave of new studies on the evolutionary status of Betelgeuse,” Montargès says. “Depending on past, present and future interactions between the two stars, the supernova could possibly be advanced or delayed.

“Betelgeuse is a star that has been observed throughout history,” Montargès continues. “It was even depicted in prehistoric paintings, yet we are discovering one of its fundamental characteristics only now.”

And that is not all: “30% of red supergiants in our galaxy show the type of light variations that led to the discovery of Betelgeuse’s companion,” he tells Physics World. “We may have opened a new avenue to find such binary systems, when the primary star is an evolved star like Betelgeuse.”

The new study is detailed in Astronomy and Astrophysics.

The post Betelgeuse is not alone appeared first on Physics World.

A galaxy that formed around a billion years after the Big Bang is in its death throes thanks to a powerful galactic wind that is blasting its gas into space, say astronomers at Australia’s Swinburne University of Technology. The discovery, which is based on data from the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST) and the Atacama Large Millimeter/submillimeter Array (ALMA) in Chile, could help explain why some of the universe’s earliest massive galaxies ceased to form new stars.

One of the JWST’s most surprising discoveries is that when the universe was between one and two billion years old, it already contained large numbers of massive galaxies. Astronomers think these galaxies may have acquired most of their mass in intense bursts of star formation. But at some point, that process stopped: in technical terms, the galaxies became quiescent.

“These galaxies seemed to have formed all their stars very quickly and then they suddenly died, all within the first two billion years of the universe being formed,” says Rebecca Davies, who led the new research.

The CRISTAL-02 galaxy

One possible explanation for the onset of quiescence is that when galaxies collide with each other, the resulting winds “blow away” the hydrogen fuel required for new stars to form. To investigate this hypothesis, Davies and colleagues focused on a galaxy called CRISTAL-02, which was one of 20 galaxies in the recent ALMA-CRISTAL survey of early star-forming galaxies.

“When we looked at the data, it stood out because it was the only one that showed strong evidence for a galaxy wind,” Davies explains. “We saw this as an excellent opportunity to study how winds impacted the evolution of galaxies in the early universe.”

The light from CRISTAL-02 travelled for approximately 12.7 billion years to reach us, meaning that we see it as it was one billion years after the Big Bang. Because the universe has been expanding since then, the galaxy’s spectra appear highly red-shifted. This meant the Swinburne astronomers needed the JWST’s infrared-sensing capabilities to analyse a spectral feature known as the hydrogen-alpha (Hα) line that is normally red. They also used ALMA to analyse CRISTAL-02’s C II line, which comes from ionized carbon and has a (non-redshifted) wavelength of 158 mm. Both emission lines can yield important information about the properties of early galaxies.

Living fast and dying young

From the ALMA-CRISTAL survey’s measurements of Hα luminosity, astronomers knew that CRISTAL-02 forms stars at a rate of around 260 M_☉ per year. This is about three times the average value for “main-sequence” star-forming galaxies at similar mass and redshifts.

The latest observations, however, suggest that it won’t maintain this pace for long. Davies and colleagues identified a huge plume of C II emissions that extends as far as 7 kiloparsecs (kpc) to the north-east of CRISTAL-02, making it almost as long as the galaxy itself. This is a telltale sign that gas is being driven out of the galaxy. The fact that the gas in this plume is blue-shifted by 100 km s^-1 lends further support to this explanation.

If this rapid blowout continues, Davies says that CRISTAL-02 will cease to exist in less than 50 million years. But the team’s findings may have implications beyond the fate of this single galaxy. “Our results could help to explain how some of the earliest massive quiescent galaxies in the universe behave,” she tells Physics World. “When the JWST started observing distant galaxies in 2022, it found far more evolved galaxies in the early universe than models predicted. These galaxies seemed to have formed all their stars very quickly and then suddenly died, all within the first two billion years of the universe. The galaxy we discovered seems to be following this path.”

Learning about the early universe

Davies explains that because the early universe was much more compact than it is now, collisions between galaxies were common. During such collisions, gas funnels towards the galactic centres, triggering strong bursts of star formation but also producing strong winds that eventually drive the gas away. “If many early galaxies collide and experience rapid growth, then it may not be surprising at all that we see so many dead galaxies in the early universe,” she says.

The researchers stress that the present work, which is detailed in the Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, is based on a case study of just one galaxy. They now need to observe other early, massive galaxies caught during periods of intense growth to determine whether they, too, experience powerful winds that could rapidly expel their gas and stop them from forming stars.

The post Powerful cosmic winds may have destroyed galaxies in the early universe appeared first on Physics World.

An artificial buffer composed of a photoionizing material released into space at the edge of Earth’s magnetic field could hold off powerful solar storms that potentially pose a risk to modern civilization.

The plan to put a buffer in place is called StormWall, proposed by space plasma dynamicist Brian Walsh of Boston University, and Dan Welling and Zhenguang Huang of the University of Michigan.

Solar storms are triggered when a coronal mass ejection (CME) on the Sun launches a vast cloud of charged particles towards us. If this cloud hits us, the charged particles can overwhelm Earth’s magnetic field. Magnetic reconnection, the process of magnetic-field lines snapping under pressure from the solar storm and joining back together, inputs much of the CME’s energy into Earth’s magnetosphere, where it can make its way down to the surface via charged particles stored in Earth’s radiation belts.

“Magnetic reconnection is the gateway by which energy comes from the Sun into Earth’s space environment,” Walsh tells Physics World.

The efficiency with which magnetic reconnection accomplishes this is governed by the magnetic field’s strength and direction, plus the density of plasma – ionized atoms and molecules – in Earth’s magnetosphere. The stronger the field strength and the lower the plasma density, the more energy reconnection deposits on the Earth.

Bolstering our defences

Although we cannot change the magnetic-field strength, “we can increase the plasma density by depositing material into space that can be photoionized,” says Walsh.

Nature already does this to a modest extent. Atoms and molecules leak from the upper atmosphere and are photoionized by solar ultraviolet light. This involves knocking an electron off an atom or molecule, thereby giving it an electric charge that allows it to interact with the magnetic field. The ionized materials follow natural “drift paths” along magnetic-field lines to the edge of the magnetosphere.

StormWall intends to bolster these natural defences by adding large quantities of material. In their work, Walsh, Welling and Huang suggest that a group of six spacecraft placed in geosynchronous orbit and each carrying the equivalent of a dozen fuel tankers’ worth of material would provide enough of a shield to ward off a solar storm. However, Walsh says that ultimately a greater number of smaller spacecraft might be more efficient.

“There is an economy of scale and the potential for international collaboration when the number of spacecraft becomes bigger,” he says. “The beautiful thing is that there’s not a lot of complicated technology in it.”

The key component is the material, and Walsh and his team have looked at a range of materials, particularly alkalines such as lithium and sodium.

“The most important thing is that it has to photoionize relatively quickly, and alkaline materials are great for that,” says Walsh, who highlights salt water, which is rich in sodium, as one possibility.

Simulations indicate that such a plasma buffer could cut the intensity of a solar storm by half as the bulk of the solar plasma is diverted around us, in the same way that stream-water flows around a stone.

Expensive problems

StormWall would not be a perfect solution. For one thing, it would be mightily expensive to launch – Walsh’s estimate is in the same region as the $4 billion Artemis II mission, maybe a little less. Furthermore, StormWall is a one-shot deal. After the photoionizing material is released, the space tankers will be left dry and more spacecraft will have to be launched to replace them.

StormWall would also require perfect timing. The photoionizing material would only remain in Earth’s magnetosphere for about six hours before dissipating into space. Releasing it at the right time to coincide with the arrival of the CME is paramount. This would require consistent accuracy in predicting space weather, which would be dependent on better modelling and more spacecraft observing the Sun in stereo so that CMEs can be tracked.

Walsh’s team is currently exploring ways to bring the cost down and make the process more efficient, such as a staged release of material that lasts longer in the magnetosphere, or a more suitable orbit that enables a more targeted release of material.

The Carrington Event revisited

In 1859, a solar storm of such ferocity hit Earth that it prompted telegraph wires to catch fire from the energy that it dumped into electrical systems. This storm is known as the Carrington Event and, if it took place today, the total damage could exceed $2.4 trillion. Our entire modern way of life, revolving around electrical grids, data centres, banking systems, the Internet, satellite GPS and communications, would be affected. Following the powerful solar storms of May 2024, which saw the Northern Lights visible for several nights as far south as the Bahamas and the Canary Islands, the cost to farmers in the US alone who lost GPS signal for their precision tractor farming was at least $500 million. So while several billion dollars to launch StormWall is expensive, the cost of not launching could be far higher, argues Walsh.

Unfortunately, Walsh does not see a great deal of movement from governments or businesses to try and protect ourselves.

“There is a very small United Nations group that thinks about this, but there’s little action,” says Walsh. “In 2018 the US’s Department of Homeland Security reported on the most likely threats that we are not paying attention to. Number one was a pandemic, and number two was a solar storm.”

With private companies now owning more assets in space than governments, the onus is increasingly on both billionaires and politicians to take pre-emptive action to mitigate the effects of a catastrophic solar storm.

“We are vulnerable, but StormWall would be in a good position to do something about it,” says Walsh.

Walsh, Welling and Huang report their proposal in Space Weather.

The post Can we create a shield to protect Earth from solar storms? appeared first on Physics World.