❌

Reading view

A 2,700-Year-Old Stone Could Shed New Light on a Religious Reform Described in the Bible

A massive stone, deliberately laid on its side and buried within the walls of an ancient Judean home, may provide physical evidence consistent with interpretations of King Hezekiah’s reported religious reforms.

The Hebrew Bible describes the events of Hezekiah’s reforms, including the tearing down of shrines, the destruction of sacred pillars, and the relocation of religious practice from the countryside into royal control in Jerusalem. For decades, archaeologists have searched for evidence of these changes, mostly by studying temples and public worship sites.

A new study by Avraham Faust of Bar-Ilan University, published in the Jerusalem Journal of Archaeology, suggests that important evidence may also be found in private residences.

A Stone That Wasn’t Supposed to Move

The study focuses on a massebah, a cultic standing stone about 4.6 feet tall and weighing 750 kilograms, found at Tel ‘Eton in the Judean Lowlands. The stone was originally located inside Building 101, a large residence sometimes referred to as the Governor’s Residency. Archaeologists found it placed in the largest room, directly opposite the entrance, where it functioned as a central feature for anyone entering the building.

Scholars have documented that standing stones of this type throughout the ancient Near East have ritual significance. This particular stone does not appear to have had a clear structural or practical function. “The location of the stone suggests that it played an important role in the lives of the building’s occupants,” Faust said.

Decommissioned, Not Destroyed

Sometime before the Assyrian destruction of Tel ‘Eton at the end of the eighth century BCE, during the period of Hezekiah’s reign, the stone’s status changed. Rather than leaving it upright and visible, the builders laid it on its side and incorporated it into a stone platform. The people responsible did not smash or desecrate the stone. They carefully removed it from use without destroying it.

“Those responsible for changing religious practices may have wished to eliminate the stone’s ritual function, and perhaps wanted the old ritual objects desecrated, but the people who carried out the change seem to have treated it with respect,” Faust said. “They removed it from use without destroying it, effectively neutralizing its cultic significance while preserving the object itself.”

Rare Domestic Evidence

Most searches for evidence of the events of Hezekiah’s reforms have focused on public worship sites, such as the temple at Arad and the dismantled altar at Beersheba. Researchers consider these sites significant, but competing interpretations persist, partly because so few examples exist.

Domestic religious practice presents a different challenge. When a household abandoned a religious object, people often removed or discarded it, leaving no trace for archaeologists to find centuries later. Since ordinary homes do not receive the same archaeological attention as temples and traditional sites of worship, evidence of religious practice located within these residences often disappears rather than being properly preserved or studied. This makes the Tel ‘Eton stone unusual in the archaeological record. People left it in place, buried it, and sealed it inside a platform, where it remained undisturbed for nearly 3,000 years.

An Open Question

Faust does not overstate the discovery. The study does not claim that Hezekiah’s policies directly led to the stone’s decommissioning. The dating places the event only within his reign, but not as a definite result of them. Still, the timing, the method of removal, and the care taken to preserve the object all match a period when religious practice across Judah appears to have been changing.

Scholars still debate whether Hezekiah’s reforms happened as described in the Bible or instead reflect later religious ideas. Either way, this discovery adds a rare example of domestic evidence to a debate usually focused on public religious sites.

Austin Burgess is a writer and researcher with a background in sales, marketing, and data analytics. He holds an MBA, a Bachelor of Science in Business Administration, and a data analytics certification. His work focuses on breaking scientific developments, with an emphasis on emerging biology, cognitive neuroscience, and archaeological discoveries.

  •  

Dementia Projected to Cost the U.S. $818 Billion in 2024

A groundbreaking study led by researchers at the University of Southern California (USC) has revealed that Alzheimer’s disease and related dementias are projected to impose an astronomical economic burden on the United States in 2026, amounting to an estimated $818 billion. This figure eclipses prior estimates as it incorporates often overlooked and nuanced costs, including the significant toll on the quality of life for those living with dementia and the substantial unpaid care provided by family members and friends. This comprehensive accounting reshapes our understanding of dementia’s societal impact, underscoring the urgency of policy innovation and resource allocation.

Traditional assessments of dementia’s economic footprint have primarily focused on direct medical and long-term care expenses. However, this USC study breaks new ground by adopting a holistic approach that integrates broader social and economic dimensions. The model includes quality of life diminishment for patients and informal caregivers, loss of income due to both the disease and caregiving responsibilities, and the extensive, unpaid labor carried out by millions of family members — a demographic often in their prime working years. This multifaceted approach allows for a more accurate reflection of the real costs dementia inflicts on society.

The study’s authors estimate that approximately 5.7 million Americans will be living with dementia in 2026, with 5.1 million of these individuals aged 65 and over. This demographic shift drives the increasing financial demands on healthcare systems and families alike. More crucially, the profound cognitive and functional decline experienced by dementia sufferers translates to a staggering $320 billion in lost quality of life, representing the single largest cost category. Care partners, often emotionally and physically strained, suffer quality-of-life costs valued at an additional $15 billion, quantifying the invisible burden that has been historically underestimated.

Unpaid caregiving, a cornerstone of dementia support, amounts to an astonishing 6.8 billion hours annually, contributed by approximately 5.2 million unpaid caregivers. This contribution is monetized at $237 billion, illustrating the massive economic value of informal care networks sustaining individuals with dementia. Long-term medical care, which includes nursing homes, home health services, and medical treatments, is projected at $222 billion. Medicare and Medicaid programs are shoulder approximately 70% of these costs, creating fiscal pressures on public health financing, while families and patients face out-of-pocket expenses near $46 billion—a significant financial stressor for many households.

Furthermore, the study incorporates lost wages, quantifying foregone earnings of $23 billion for both individuals living with dementia and their unpaid caregivers. These labor market impacts have wide-ranging implications for household financial stability and overall economic productivity. By deploying a dynamic microsimulation modeling framework and leveraging large nationally representative datasets—such as the Health and Retirement Study and administrative data from Medicare and Medicaid—the researchers have crafted a data-driven lens through which to forecast future dementia costs under various clinical and policy scenarios.

This evolving cost model is significant not only for its predictive power but for its potential to inform decision-making at multiple levels. It integrates peer-reviewed methodologies, published in a dedicated methods paper that ensures transparency in data sources, assumptions, and simulations. This methodological rigor equips policymakers, healthcare providers, and researchers with a robust platform to interrogate the efficacy of emerging treatments, changes in care delivery models, and evolving health policies. The goal is to better understand how these innovations might shift dementia’s economic and social impact.

The USC-led team’s interdisciplinary composition enhances the study’s depth and applicability. Contributors hail from diverse academic units within USC—including the Price School of Public Policy, the Mann School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, the Davis School of Gerontology, and the Viterbi School of Engineering—as well as esteemed external collaborators from the Alzheimer’s Association and the University of Pennsylvania. This collaboration has generated a model enriched by real-world insights from people with mild cognitive impairment and their care partners, gathered through Alzheimer’s Association panels. Their lived experiences add critical context often absent from purely quantitative analyses.

In parallel with advances in medical science, this research dovetails with promising trends in dementia detection and management. FDA-approved blood tests now allow for the pre-symptomatic identification of Alzheimer’s pathology, while emerging therapeutics show potential in slowing disease progression. Innovative care models focused on keeping individuals at home for longer durations while supporting family caregivers further signal a paradigm shift in dementia care. This study’s comprehensive cost framework can serve to evaluate the economic and societal ripple effects of such innovations, offering a valuable forecasting tool amid the rapidly changing landscape.

Lead researcher Julie Zissimopoulos emphasizes that accurate, comprehensive cost assessments are vital for allocation of resources in the face of a growing dementia population. This modeling approach allows for simulations that address critical questions, such as how slow-progressing treatments could improve quality of life or reduce nursing home demand, yielding insights needed for smarter, evidence-based policymaking. For example, understanding potential reductions in caregiving burden or shifts in out-of-pocket expenses can guide investment priorities across public health and social services sectors.

Moreover, the dynamic microsimulation approach employed by the study captures longitudinal impacts on individual trajectories, accounting for how health interventions at earlier disease stages might alter future care needs and economic costs. By continuously updating the model with new data inputs and methodological enhancements, the USC team ensures that their projections remain responsive to evolving clinical knowledge and demographic trends, positioning the cost estimates as authoritative inputs for strategic planning.

A particularly striking takeaway is the valuation of informal caregiving, which emphasizes the critical yet underappreciated role family and friends play in sustaining the dementia-affected population. The emotional, physical, and financial strain borne by these caregivers often goes unrecognized in policy dialogues. Quantifying these costs helps to illuminate the hidden layers of dementia’s societal toll, strengthening the argument for supportive interventions, caregiver resources, and systemic reforms to alleviate their burden.

Dana Goldman, founding director of the USC Schaeffer Institute, highlights that understanding the expanding economic footprint of dementia is fundamental to harnessing the full potential of scientific and care innovations. As Alzheimer’s disease and related dementias continue to challenge health systems globally, this study outlines a crucial framework for evaluating the interplay between emerging therapeutics, care delivery, and economic sustainability. It advocates for data-driven policies that adapt to and capitalize on these transformative changes.

This comprehensive analysis of dementia’s economic burden thus represents a critical step forward in the public health and policy arenas. Its nuanced incorporation of quality-of-life metrics, unpaid caregiving, lost earnings, and formal healthcare expenses paints a detailed portrait of the multifaceted costs dementia imposes. As American society confronts a rapidly aging population, these findings serve as a clarion call to address the broad spectrum of dementia’s impact, ensuring informed strategies to mitigate its profound human and economic consequences.


Subject of Research: Economic Impact of Alzheimer’s Disease and Related Dementias
Article Title: The 2026 U.S. Cost of Dementia: A Comprehensive Model Accounting for Quality of Life and Informal Caregiving
News Publication Date: 24 June 2026
Web References: https://schaeffer.usc.edu/cost-of-dementia-model/; https://alz-journals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/alz.71480
References: Zissimopoulos, J., et al. (2026). Comprehensive cost modeling of Alzheimer’s disease and related dementias. Alzheimer’s & Dementia: The Journal of the Alzheimer’s Association, doi:10.1002/alz.71480
Image Credits: USC Schaeffer Center for Health Policy & Economics

Keywords: Dementia, Alzheimer’s disease, Economic burden, Quality of life, Informal caregiving, Health care costs, Lost wages, Policy modeling, Aging population, Health economics, Microsimulation

  •  

New Feathered Dinosaur from China Had Peacock-Like Tail

Changzhousaurus sinensis. Image credit: Connor Ashbridge / CC BY 4.0.

A new genus and species of four-winged pennaraptoran dinosaur from the Early Cretaceous of northern China is adding another twist to the story of how birds evolved from their dinosaur ancestors.

The post New Feathered Dinosaur from China Had Peacock-Like Tail appeared first on Sci.News: Breaking Science News.

  •  

US's climate.gov site, taken down by Trump, relaunched by nonprofit

Over decades, researchers in the US government and programs it sponsored built up a tremendous number of climate resources, from comprehensive analyses to massive datasets to basic explainers meant to inform the public. And people within the government built the climate.gov website to make it all accessible. But if you try to navigate there today, you get redirected to the climate page of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, and are greeted with the following message:

In compliance with Executive Order 14303 (“Restoring Gold Standard Science”), the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy’s June 23, 2025 Memorandum (“Agency Guidance for Implementing Gold Standard Science in the Conduct & Management of Scientific Activities”), 15 USC § 2904 (“National Climate Program”), 15 USC § 2934 (“National Global Change Research Plan”), and 33 USC § 893a (“NOAA Ocean and Atmospheric Science Education Programs”), you have been redirected to NOAA.gov. Future research products previously housed under Climate.gov will be available at NOAA.gov/climate and its affiliate websites.

Climate.gov was essentially gone, and the team that deleted implied that it happened because climate research somehow failed to uphold what the administration was calling "gold standard science."

But the people who put together climate.gov didn't go away. While the government didn't hesitate to delete inconvenient climate information, dedicated volunteers outside the government managed to preserve copies of much of the material, which the federal government is prohibited from copyrighting. The volunteers and former climate.gov admins got together and launched climate.us. On Tuesday, the team announced that it had completed the project to restore everything lost when climate.gov shut down.

Read full article

Comments

© NASA

  •  

US's climate.gov site, taken down by Trump, relaunched by nonprofit

Over decades, researchers in the US government and programs it sponsored built up a tremendous number of climate resources, from comprehensive analyses to massive datasets to basic explainers meant to inform the public. And people within the government built the climate.gov website to make it all accessible. But if you try to navigate there today, you get redirected to the climate page of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, and are greeted with the following message:

In compliance with Executive Order 14303 (“Restoring Gold Standard Science”), the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy’s June 23, 2025 Memorandum (“Agency Guidance for Implementing Gold Standard Science in the Conduct & Management of Scientific Activities”), 15 USC § 2904 (“National Climate Program”), 15 USC § 2934 (“National Global Change Research Plan”), and 33 USC § 893a (“NOAA Ocean and Atmospheric Science Education Programs”), you have been redirected to NOAA.gov. Future research products previously housed under Climate.gov will be available at NOAA.gov/climate and its affiliate websites.

Climate.gov was essentially gone, and the team that deleted implied that it happened because climate research somehow failed to uphold what the administration was calling "gold standard science."

But the people who put together climate.gov didn't go away. While the government didn't hesitate to delete inconvenient climate information, dedicated volunteers outside the government managed to preserve copies of much of the material, which the federal government is prohibited from copyrighting. The volunteers and former climate.gov admins got together and launched climate.us. On Tuesday, the team announced that it had completed the project to restore everything lost when climate.gov shut down.

Read full article

Comments

© NASA

  •  

Domestic Cats Age Like Humans, New Study Shows

Lauren Scott & Brittany Florkiewicz show that cat facial signals correspond to different social functions, which have likely been influenced by domestication. Image credit: Sci.News / Makieni777 / Rise-a-mui / Alexas_Fotos / Dorothe / Vaclav Zavada / Artem Makarov / Daga Roszkowska / Birgit / Pasi Mammela.

Domestic cats (Felis catus) develop the same patterns of brain shrinkage and neurological decline as aging humans, and scientists think that makes them an ideal window into dementia and aging.

The post Domestic Cats Age Like Humans, New Study Shows appeared first on Sci.News: Breaking Science News.

  •  
❌