❌

Normal view

Want a higher paying tech job? Employers seek AI fluency

21 October 2026 at 13:24

Employers are getting pickier when looking at tech resumes, but competition for the right skills is still intense. Companies will pay a premium for experience and advanced AI skills.

“The market is no longer defined simply by how many people employers hire, but by how precisely they hire,” said Ger Doyle, ManpowerGroup’s regional president for North America.

In many cases, employers would rather leave a position open than make the wrong hire, Doyle said.

AI fluency and expertise are driving higher salaries, talent consulting firm Robert Half said after surveying more than 2,000 hiring managers, business leaders, and employed workers for its 2027 salary guide. “72% are increasing pay for relevant AI skills, with 42% offering more for AI-related expertise than other technical skills,” the firm said.

The tech job market today

There were 272,040 new IT openings posted in September, boosting the active listings to 625,633, the highest in more than three years, according to a study released by CompTIA earlier this month. About 349,821 jobs listed in September — more than half the active listings — needed AI skills, growing by 32,327 compared to August, CompTIA said.

In a recent survey of tech and IT service employers, AI literacy was the most in-demand technical skill, with 34% of US respondents naming it as a sought-after skill, reported Experis, part of ManpowerGroup, in its fourth-quarter talent outlook. AI modeling and app development followed close behind at 33%.

“We’re seeing it influence hiring across occupations ranging from data science and engineering to project management and operational roles,” ManpowerGroup’s Doyle said.

Employers face a tug-of-war as workflows transform and job requirements change, said Michael Chui, senior fellow at McKinsey.

“You have to have the right talent in place. You have to retrain. You might have to change the incentives. That’s all hard work,” Chui said.

What skills are sought

AI skills in demand are increasingly tied to business priorities and outcomes, consulting firm PwC said in a June study.

Companies want to hire AI-fluent workers who can hit the ground running. They prefer candidates who have used cutting-edge tools and services.

In tech job postings, employers are seeking more experience but fewer skills, said Dean Boerner, a data scientist at Revelio Labs, in a study published last month. Since late 2024, the average number of skills required in tech job postings dropped from about 30 to 21, while required experience rose from about 4.6 to 4.8 years.

Employers particularly want more years of experience in data-related skills such as data organization, data research, and enterprise architecture design. This translates to hiring experienced personnel rather than handing duties to junior hires or AI systems, Revelio said in its study.

Fewer job listings mention broad categories like software and application development, the study said, while a larger number of job listings mention specialized skills such as Java API development and Python development. Other AI-linked skills including networking, cloud development, and machine learning are also in demand.

The AI infrastructure buildout has also led to an increased demand for semiconductor talent, network architects, construction managers, and software developers.

“Data centers are the factories of the AI economy, and every server rack that comes online needs someone who knows how to run it,” said Kye Mitchell, head of Experis US.

Experts said software developer roles are now pivoting toward data and machine learning expertise. AI is automating coding, so software developers are becoming AI engineers with duties that include verifying AI-derived code and ensuring compliance.

“Governance is a thing in which engineers will have a key role to play… AI engineers build contextual guardrails for compliance,” said Deepak Seth, senior director analyst at Gartner.

Salaries

AI engineer will be among the top-paid jobs in 2027, with salaries ranging from $154,500 to $196,750, depending on experience, according to Robert Half.

AI architects get between $145,250 and $204,000. Salaries for AI/ML analysts, machine-learning engineers, and data scientists range from $121,250 to $186,750.

RPA (robotic process automation) engineers, who focus on software and automation, get salaries between $107,000 and $155,250. Salaries also depend on location.

Career ladder

AI is throwing out the traditional way to climb up the career ladder. Hands-on experience and on-the-job upskilling matter more, while academic credentials carry less weight.

Companies are looking for specialized, judgment-heavy skills, “which younger workers are the least equipped to offer,” Revelio Labs said in its study. 

PwC noted that entry-level roles in AI-exposed jobs now demand skills that are traditionally developed through experience, such as leadership and strategic thinking.

“Organizations must rethink how they mentor and train junior staff, helping them step up to complex decision-making much earlier in their careers,” PwC said in its June report.

Fresh graduates combining technical fundamentals with practical experience, AI fluency, and strong communication skills will stand out, Experis’ Mitchell said.

“[Employers] are also building talent from within, expanding talent pools, and using multiple strategies to meet their needs,” Mitchell said.

Proof of AI proficiency in the workplace will become a standard requirement, Gartner’s Seth said. By 2027, 75% of hiring processes will include certifications and testing for workplace AI proficiency during recruiting, he said.

“Anybody in the IT world knows… we were asked for certifications about Java or C++ or whatever. Now suddenly that will shift to workplace AI proficiency,” Seth said.

Skills are also going out of date faster. “The half-life of technical skills will shorten from 8 to 12 years to 2 to 5 years. So adaptability and learning velocity will become very, very key,” Seth said.

“Rehiring is expensive. Reskilling is a better option,” Seth said.

MacVoices #26273: Live! – Remembering Steve Jobs, John Ternus and Design, Choosing iPhone Duo

By: Chuck
7 October 2026 at 22:50
After Day 1, the panel compares Amazon Prime Day deals and strategies for separating real bargains from inflated discounts. On a more serious note, they reflect on the 15th anniversary of Steve Jobs’ death. John Ternus’ increased focus on design and what it could mean for Apple’s future, and the the iPhone Duo’s replaceable display layer and other improvements designed to address traditional foldable-phone weaknesses wrap up the session. 

💾

MacVoices #26266: Live! – Siri Gets Smarter, Tim Cook’s New Role, Woz’s Merch Store

By: Chuck
29 September 2026 at 01:30
The panel explores first impressions of Siri AI, from image searches, weather, news, and Vision Pro visual recognition to unexpected limitations involving apps and personal context. The discussion also covers Steve Jobs and Apple Store history, Steve Wozniak’s new merchandise venture, Apple’s wearable market strength, GM’s continuing retreat from CarPlay, and Tim Cook’s expanding diplomatic role. 

💾

Antennagate Q&A

25 September 2026 at 20:26

Hartley Charlton:

A 47-minute video of the Q&A session from Apple’s 2010 iPhone 4 “antennagate” press conference has surfaced on YouTube, showing Steve Jobs, Tim Cook, and Bob Mansfield answering reporters’ questions.

[…]

Jobs used his prepared presentation to announce free cases for eligible customers and a 30-day return option. Apple later posted video of that presentation, but left out the Q&A, which was documented at the time through written reports and photographs.

John Gruber:

The Q&A was on the record (which is the entire point of a Q&A), and was reported widely, but I don’t think there’s ever been video of it. Here’s a report by Jeff Carlson at TidBITS, published the day the event was held, which states, “The video omits a long and interesting Q&A at the end.”

Then, yesterday, video of the Q&A hit YouTube. I don’t know what truck it fell off the back of, why it took 16 years, or how it came into the hands of “Sir Mix-A-Lot Rare Music”, but I’m sure glad it did. There are parts of this Q&A that I remembered, and parts I didn’t. Carlson was exactly right: it was long and it was interesting.

My main takeaway is still that there were two stories here, but most of the media missed one of them, and Apple was happy to focus on the other.

The first story was that holding iPhone 4 in the wrong way would reduce the signal strength. Apple pointed out that other phones had the same problem, to varying degrees, and offered cases as a solution.

The second was that, even with a case, iPhone 4 had worse reception than previous iPhones. I saw this directly myself: testing my iPhone 3GS and my father’s iPhone 4 in some areas that had poor signal, and finding that one worked reliably and the other was completely unusable. Apple examined my father’s iPhone 4 and assured us it wasn’t a lemon, so there was no choice but to return it. AnandTech did some more precise testing and published some graphs that were consistent with what we saw. I think it was the only bad iPhone Apple made.

In the Q&A, the first question was about Jobs’s health. The second was about whether Apple was going to make any changes to the antenna. Jobs responded that the iPhone 4 antenna was better in almost every way than previous designs. But Apple did end up redesigning the antenna with the iPhone 4s, and it worked just fine in my same test areas. It’s possible that the cell towers had changed in the interim, but the 4s worked well for me everywhere that it could be expected to and ended up being one of my favorites.

Nick Heer:

Sam Henri Gold decided to pick apart the changes between iOS 4.0 and iOS 4.0.1, which changed the number of bars shown in moderate-to-low reception areas[…]

Previously:

Shop Different

21 September 2026 at 21:46

HarperCollins (Amazon):

When Steve Jobs hired Ron Johnson to create the Apple Store in 2000, conventional wisdom said that the internet would put stores out of business. By the time he left Apple in 2011, Johnson and his team had created the most respected and profitable retail stores in the world. And even then, skeptics were still predicting the death of physical retail.

In Shop Different, Johnson reveals how it happened: how he earned Jobs’s trust, how they developed a vision for a store that would win not by selling but by serving, and how he convinced Jobs that the store’s service philosophy should be rooted in something as intangible as love. Johnson then gives readers a new look at Apple’s ascent to the most valuable company in the world; offers an inspiring vision for a future in which retailers win on connection, service, and experience; and shares an honest look at what leads to success—and what can follow.

I enjoyed this interview that Jeff Benjamin and Fernando Silva did with Ron Johnson.

Previously:

Update (2026-09-25): Ron Johnson:

I told Steve, we’re going to get these people who are really good at technology, but they love people and are [good at conversation]. […] And he said, they don’t exist. Everyone who knows technology is kind of geeky. Maybe you call it the geek bar. […] But then I’d seen Apple’s genius campaign, and I felt like if we called a Genius Bar, People would come out of the woodwork wanting that job. Because who wouldn’t want to be the smartest Apple person in every city?

[…]

I said, you know, if the Mac’s a success, it’ll be the center of your digital life. And he came into the executive team meeting the next Monday, and I’m not saying it was solely that conversation, he probably had a lot of conversations about similar things, but he got all excited and stood at the whiteboard and drew a picture.

[…]

After I heard that, that night I was thinking about it, I woke up and I thought, well, if Steve’s going to market the Mac as the digital hub, our store’s [need to do that]. Our store was like any retail store, it was is built around products. We had portables and desktops.

I told Steve, well, maybe we ought to organize a store on movies and music and photos and the things you do.

❌