Astronomers have found a third giant planet around Beta Pictoris, one of the best-known young planetary systems near Earth. The discovery is striking because the planet was not first picked out as a bright dot in a telescope image. NASA’s James Webb Space Telescope found it in the spectrum of light coming from the system: […]

The post Webb Found a Hidden Planet in Beta Pictoris By Reading Its Atmosphere appeared first on Curiosmos.

Have you ever eaten a meal so quickly that you started to glow? Although this behavior likely isn’t relatable for most humans, astronomers are beginning to find more and more baby planets doing just that.

Planetary Glow Up

Planets are, famously, quite large. But astronomers know that they don’t start out that way, and that instead, stars and planetary systems start as wispy collections of dust and gas. This raw material eventually compresses itself into stars and planets and life capable of contemplating such things, but how exactly that happens is not perfectly understood.

Astronomers have the broad contours sketched out at least. Protoplanets destined to become gas giants like Jupiter and Saturn start by gobbling up all the material around them and eventually clear out gaps in the disks in which they are born. What little material flows into these gaps gets sucked onto the planet in a process called accretion, though exactly where this material lands and how gravity and magnetic fields interact is up for debate.

A number of different mechanisms predict that during this process, the protoplanet should emit light at a certain frequency associated with electrons jumping between energy levels in hydrogen atoms — what astronomers call Hα emission. In other words, they should glow at that specific wavelength only when they are accreting, though how strongly and consistently will depend on exactly what is happening around the planet.

These ideas existed only on paper until 2019, when a team first observed two glowing, growing planets around the star PDS 70. Recently, however, a powerful new instrument has begun collecting data, and astronomers just announced it has found another similar protoplanet: WISPIT-2b.

A New Discovery

A team of researchers led by Laird Close (University of Arizona) announced the discovery of this new world after analyzing images taken with the powerful new MagAO-X instrument on one of the 6.5-meter Magellan telescopes in Chile. The team outfitted the camera with a narrow filter that only admitted the Hα emission associated with accretion, then collected thousands of images over about two hours in April 2025. After stacking and post-processing their data, a faint dot jumped out beside the central star, right in the gap between two bright rings in the star’s disk.

This protoplanet, which the authors name WISPIT-2b in honor of their Wide Separation Planets in Time (WISPIT) survey, is likely about five times the mass of Jupiter and only 5 million years old, making it a baby on astronomical timescales. Based on how strongly it’s glowing, the team estimates that it’s accreting the equivalent of about 100 times the mass of Phobos, Mars’s largest moon, each year. This process won’t continue forever, as eventually the remains of the star’s disk will disperse and the planet will have to go hungry.

This remarkable find is only the third protoplanet unambiguously found to be embedded within a disk, and the first to be found in the gap between rings in a disk. With MagAO-X collecting data and the WISPIT survey underway, we’re likely in store for many other discoveries in the coming years. With enough observations and examples of these growing worlds, astronomers will fill in their models of how exactly giant planets as we know them are formed.

Citation

“Wide Separation Planets in Time (WISPIT): Discovery of a Gap Hα Protoplanet WISPIT 2b with MagAO-X,” Laird M. Close et al 2025 ApJL 990 L9. doi:10.3847/2041-8213/adf7a5

The post Researchers Spot a Rare Glowing, Growing Planet appeared first on AAS Nova.

Editor’s Note: Astrobites is a graduate-student-run organization that digests astrophysical literature for undergraduate students. As part of the partnership between the AAS and astrobites, we occasionally repost astrobites content here at AAS Nova. We hope you enjoy this post from astrobites; the original can be viewed at astrobites.org.

Title: Clouds Can Enhance Direct-Imaging Detection of O₂ and O₃ on Terrestrial Exoplanets
Authors: Huanzhou Yang, Michelle Hu, and Dorian S. Abbot
First Author’s Institution: University of Chicago
Status: Published in ApJ

In the hunt for life beyond Earth, studying exoplanet atmospheres is one of our most powerful tools. The atmosphere of an exoplanet acts as a window into its environment and allows astronomers to take a guess at what processes are shaping the planet’s climate, chemistry, and thus, its potential for habitability. The gases present in the planet’s atmosphere impart a unique spectral fingerprint on the light that passes through the atmosphere and allows us to identify what gases might be present and look for possible signs of life.

JWST is already hard at work looking at distant worlds and gathering spectroscopic data for us to analyse. It has already observed several exoplanets and recorded the light that passed through their atmospheres. This has not only sparked a debate over what could be interpreted as the first possible signs of biological activity, but has also given us a glimpse of worlds that are remarkably different from our own.

However, JWST is mostly limited to observing the atmospheres of transiting exoplanets. That means planets that orbit close to their host star and are more or less directly edge-on, as viewed from us, so that they transit across the face of the star. The only planets that the telescope is able to observe directly are big, young, and hot planets farther from their host star, at distances more resembling those of the outer planets in our solar system, like Saturn or Uranus. If only we had a telescope powerful enough to image a potentially habitable planet directly and analyse the light reflected from it.

The Habitable Worlds Observatory

This is where the Habitable Worlds Observatory (HWO) will come in. Now, I know what you are thinking. Why must astronomers always look towards greener pastures bigger telescopes when we already have perfectly functional space telescopes in orbit or practically on the launch pad? Well, it is true that the next flagship space telescope from NASA, the Nancy Grace Roman Space Telescope, is designed to directly image exoplanets and analyse their atmospheres. But space telescopes can take decades to plan and are often built on lessons learned from previous missions. Roman, with its 2.4-meter primary mirror and coronagraph, will be able to observe planets similar in size and orbital distance to Jupiter and will get us some of the way, for sure, but not all the way. At three times the mirror size, HWO, NASA’s proposed successor to Roman that is planned for the 2040s, will carry the torch even further and be able to directly image Earth-like planets in the habitable zone, where liquid water can exist on the planet’s surface.

But It Might Be Cloudy Tomorrow

This brings us to today’s article. If the HWO is going to potentially observe Earth analogues, we might expect it to run into the same issue that plagues everyone living in the UK for most of the year — clouds. Clouds in the atmosphere of an exoplanet can sometimes cause trouble when trying to analyse the light. Cloud particles scatter different wavelengths of light differently, and cloud variability creates dynamic changes in the observed brightness that can make it hard to know what exactly you are looking at. Clouds can also mean varying levels of opacity to look through depending on cloud composition, and they can hide underlying atmospheric properties such as water content beneath a thick cloud layer. For transmission spectroscopy, even a thin layer of clouds can disrupt the measurements as the light has to travel a long distance through the atmosphere. However, for direct imaging, the effect of clouds is perhaps more nuanced. While a thick cloud deck will block the signal from whatever gas lies beneath it, it will also increase the overall albedo of the planet and make it easier to detect the gas above. This means that cloud height and type are both critical variables in understanding atmospheric properties of exoplanets, which is what the authors of today’s article set out to investigate.

To understand how clouds affect the ability to detect signs of life on distant Earth-like planets, the authors used computer simulations. They focused on two gases, molecular oxygen (O₂) and ozone (O₃). Both gases are often regarded as biosignatures, although their astrobiological significance has been debated. The authors first used a tool that simulates how a telescope like the HWO might observe an Earth-like planet around a star 15 parsecs away. This tool predicts how light bounces off a planet’s surface and atmosphere, and whether the two gases would show up clearly in the reflected light. Next, they created realistic cloud conditions using a cloud microphysics model. This model calculates how clouds might form and behave depending on factors like surface pressure or how much sunlight the planet gets. With this they were able to change things like cloud height and particle size. They then combined the two tools by adding the simulated clouds into the observations model and building a mathematical model to help explain what they saw in the simulations. The sketch for their model can be seen in Figure 1.

A Cloudy Sky Can Actually Be a Good Thing

The researchers discovered that low clouds can actually make gases like oxygen and ozone easier to detect, because these clouds reflect more light without blocking the gases above them. On the other hand, high clouds can make it harder since they can hide the gases from view. They tested different cloud types using real data from Earth as seen in Figure 2. They looked at five common cloud types, like stratus (flat and low), cirrus (high and wispy), and deep convective clouds (tall, thunderstorm-like), and compared them to their model clouds (labelled as CARMA in the figure).

They found that most clouds improved detection, especially if the cloud droplets were small (as they reflect more light). Stratus clouds and deep convective clouds gave the strongest boost to detection, because they have a lot of water and are either low (stratus) or extend through many layers (deep convective). Ozone saw the biggest bump in detectability as it is concentrated higher in the atmosphere, which means that it is in the region above most clouds where the increased reflection from the cloud layer below makes it easier to spot. This means that unlike the case for transit spectroscopy where clouds interfere with the detection of gases, for direct observations of the reflected light, clouds may actually be a good thing. This insight into the role of clouds in exoplanet atmospheres not only refines our current understanding but also helps guide the design of future telescopes, like the HWO, and our search for life on these remote worlds.

Original astrobite edited by Maria Vincent.

About the author, Kasper Zoellner:

I have a Master of Science in astronomy and I am currently working towards a PhD in physics and educational science. My greatest passion is the search for exoplanets and how stellar variability may influence the possibility of life. I am also interested in science outreach, education, and discussing what sci-fi novel to read next!

The post Weather Forecast for the Habitable Worlds Observatory: Cloudy with a Chance of Biosignatures appeared first on AAS Nova.

JWST observations of a nearby star’s debris disk recently revealed what may be one of the lowest-mass planets ever imaged.

How to Find a Small Planet

Though it remains a formidable technical challenge, astronomers have gotten fairly good at taking images of planets around other stars by carefully blocking the light of the host and searching for the small points of light that remain. However, though this technique is well-suited for discovering large, bright, high-mass planets, their lower-mass cousins below the size of Jupiter remain challenging to detect. To get pictures of these smaller worlds, astronomers must resort to detective work and search for signs of their presence through indirect means.

One promising approach is to look not for the planet itself, but rather its effect on the dusty disk of material around the star. These structures, called debris disks, are constantly replenished by planetesimals colliding and grinding one another to dust. If a planet happens to orbit within this disk, it will “stir” the dust into distinctive patterns including rings and spiral arms. If astronomers observe that a star has a debris disk with gaps or spirals, they can analyze those substructures and deduce where a planet might be hiding.

The Star of this Show: TWA 7

TWA 7 is a tiny M-dwarf star just over 100 light-years from Earth. Data from the Spitzer Space Telescope revealed that TWA 7 was unusually bright when observed at infrared wavelengths, which hinted that there might be a warm, dusty disk surrounding the star. Follow-up observations with the Hubble Space Telescope and several major ground-based facilities confirmed that this star successfully met all the conditions listed above: TWA 7 is surrounded by a face-on debris disk with rings and a faint spiral arm. Using all of this information, astronomers predicted that a Saturn-mass planet might lie in a low-density pocket of the disk just beside the star.

This prediction led to a search with JWST last summer. Initial observations taken at mid-infrared wavelengths revealed a bright dot sitting near the predicted location of the planet. However, with just these observations, it was hard to confidently say that this source wasn’t just a distant background galaxy that happened to appear there by chance. To help settle the matter, JWST took another look in two different near-infrared wavelength bands a few weeks later.

Revisiting TWA 7

A team led by Katie Crotts (Space Telescope Science Institute) recently published these later observations. These new data show a dot in the exact same place as before, and with a color that’s much more planet-like than galaxy-like.

While this adds plenty of evidence to the planetary interpretation, the team cautions that one more set of follow-up observations is needed to be confident that this is, in fact, a planet. Assuming future observations back up these first hints, however, this would be the lowest-mass planet ever imaged, and a happy conclusion to a detective story that started with dust.

Citation

“Follow-Up Exploration of the TWA 7 Planet–Disk System with JWST NIRCam,” Katie Crotts et al 2025 ApJL 987 L41. doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ade798

The post A Dusty Disk Points to a Potential Planet appeared first on AAS Nova.

By pushing JWST to its limits, astronomers may have just spotted a planet around the nearest Sun-like star, Alpha Centauri A. Though another look at the star is needed next year to confirm the finding, if the detection holds up, this discovery easily earns several superlatives: the planet would be the nearest, oldest, coldest, and lowest-mass world ever directly imaged beyond our solar system.

Hi, Neighbor!

The scale of our Milky Way galaxy is hard to comprehend with our Earth-bound minds that are more attuned to measuring distances in miles than in light-years. However, even though our suburban stellar neighborhood is tens of thousands of light-years from the galactic downtown, it is not empty: there are a handful of nearby systems that offer unique opportunities to study stars and their potential planet children “up close.”

The nearest star system to the Sun at just over 4 light-years away is called Alpha Centauri. It’s a star “system” since what appears to the naked eye to be one star is actually three objects orbiting each other: Alpha Centauri A and Alpha Centauri B are two Sun-like stars that circle each other every 80 years or so, while Alpha Centauri C, better known as Proxima Centauri, circles the inner pair on a much wider orbit.

Though Proxima Centauri is the most famous of the trio, since it’s technically the closest star to the Sun, its larger siblings are arguably better targets for searching for planets. Since these stars are more massive, their habitable zones are large enough that astronomers can block out the star itself and search the surrounding area for planets using a tool called a coronagraph.

Challenging Observations

Back in 2019, a team of astronomers using a coronagraph on the Very Large Telescope uncovered tantalizing evidence of a giant planet orbiting Alpha Centauri A. However, confirming or rejecting this initial peek using telescopes on Earth’s surface was challenging. When JWST finally launched in 2021, following up on this hint was a top priority. Astronomers first attempted to point JWST toward the Alpha Centauri system in 2023, but unfortunately, the observations from that attempt were unusable.

Though one might think aiming a telescope at a nearby star is easier than taking a look at something more distant, this is unfortunately not the case. For one thing, the stars of the Alpha Centauri system are bright enough to overwhelm JWST’s sensitive detectors without careful calibration. For another, keeping the telescope locked on target and the star behind the coronagraph requires continuous tweaks to account for the Sun’s motion relative to Alpha Centauri, JWST’s motion relative to the Sun, and Alpha Centauri A’s motion relative to Alpha Centauri B. The team regrouped, tested a new observing strategy in mid-2024, then took three long observations in August 2024, February 2025, and April 2025.

A Planet Candidate

This time, the observations went off nearly without a hitch. After careful data processing, the team led by Charles Beichman and Aniket Sanghi of the California Institute of Technology found a bright blob positioned right beside the star in their August data. Interestingly, the blob disappeared in the next two observations. Working on the hunch that this blob was the same object as the planet candidate seen by the Very Large Telescope, the team realized that most allowed orbits would place the planet too close to the star to be visible in those later observations. In other words, the planet might be playing hide-and-seek, peeking out from behind the star in one month only to vanish in the next.

The authors estimated that the source is a 1–1.1 Jupiter radius planet with a mass of 90–150 Earth masses (0.28–0.47 Jupiter mass) on a 2–3-year orbit. The team stressed that with just one detection, this should still be regarded as a planet candidate, not a confirmed discovery. If the planet is eventually verified, however, it stands out among its peers as the first mature, cold planet ever imaged within its star’s habitable zone. Future detectors may be able to collect spectra of the planet itself, unlocking new insights into giant planet evolution and composition in multiple-star systems with nested orbits, like the Alpha Centauri system.

Now that JWST has a proven strategy for observing this challenging system, it should be possible to take follow-up images. If the planet is real and traveling on its expected orbit, it should reappear beside Alpha Centauri A in August 2026. Hopefully, JWST will be looking when it does, and we can finally confirm that we have a planetary neighbor next door.

Citation

“Worlds Next Door: A Candidate Giant Planet Imaged in the Habitable Zone of α Cen A. I. Observations, Orbital and Physical Properties, and Exozodi Upper Limits,” Charles Beichman et al 2025 ApJL 989 L22. doi:10.3847/2041-8213/adf53f

“Worlds Next Door: A Candidate Giant Planet Imaged in the Habitable Zone of α Cen A. II. Binary Star Modeling, Planet and Exozodi Search, and Sensitivity Analysis,” Aniket Sanghi et al 2025 ApJL 989 L23. doi:10.3847/2041-8213/adf53e

The post Potential Discovery of a World Next Door appeared first on AAS Nova.

Of the nearly 6,000 currently known exoplanets, few closely resemble any of the planets in our solar system. New research suggests that JWST is capable of directly imaging exoplanets with temperatures and orbital distances similar to Jupiter and Saturn, placing truly familiar exoplanets within our observational grasp.

Increasingly Cold Discoveries

JWST has already proven itself to be a powerful tool to directly image exoplanet systems. The telescope has imaged increasingly cold planets, but the gas giants in our solar system are substantially colder than the coldest planet imaged by JWST so far. This raises the question of whether JWST is capable of directly imaging Jupiter and Saturn if they orbited another star.

Answering this question requires a deep dive into the abilities of JWST’s instruments. The current go-to method for directly imaging planets with JWST is coronagraphy with its Near-Infrared Camera (NIRCam). In this observing mode, the instrument blocks the light from the star, allowing the fainter thermal glow of the planet to shine through.

But as Rachel Bowens-Rubin (University of Michigan and Eureka Scientific) and collaborators note in a recent research article, this may not be the best way to detect cold giant planets. Models suggest that these planets have cloudy atmospheres, which means that they wouldn’t be bright at NIRCam’s preferred near-infrared wavelengths, and would instead be detected more easily in the mid-infrared, where JWST’s Mid-Infrared Instrument (MIRI) reigns.

Combining Data and Models

To examine the capabilities of both of these instruments, Bowens-Rubin’s team analyzed JWST observations from the Cool Kids on the Block program, which targets cold, low-mass giant planets around nearby low-mass stars with NIRCam coronagraphy and MIRI imaging. The team used observations of nearby M-dwarf stars Wolf 359 and EV Lac to construct constrast curves: the level of planet–star flux contrast that is detectable by each instrument as a function of distance from each star. These curves depend on the flux of the star and the planet as well as the limitations of the instrument — the detector noise and background noise.

Bowens-Rubin and coauthors converted the contrast curves into information about the coldest planet each instrument can detect. To do this, the team modeled the atmospheres of planets with temperatures down to 50K and generated thermal emission spectra, which allowed them to relate the temperature of their modeled planets to the level of contrast.

NIRCam vs. MIRI

This analysis showed that MIRI is the best choice for directly imaging cold planets around nearby stars (within 65 light-years). MIRI should be able to detect giant planets with temperatures down to 94K around Wolf 359 and 114K around EV Lac — about the temperature of Saturn and slightly colder than Jupiter, respectively. For Wolf 359, sub-100K planets are detectable at orbital distances of at least 4.8 au, meaning these planets could also have similar orbital separations to Jupiter and Saturn.

NIRCam coronagraphy can match MIRI’s performance only for the unlikely case of cloud-free giant planets; for cloudy planets around nearby stars, MIRI can spot planets 90–130K colder than NIRCam can. NIRCam has the advantage for more distant stars — beyond about 200 light-years — but only planets significantly warmer than Jupiter and Saturn are detectable at these distances.

As impressive as these results are already, Bowens-Rubin and coauthors noted that future work, such as developing strategies to mitigate MIRI’s “brighter-fatter effect” that limits sensitivity at small angular separations from the host star, could enhance the search for exo-Saturns and exo-Jupiters even further.

Citation

“NIRCam Yells at Cloud: JWST MIRI Imaging Can Directly Detect Exoplanets of the Same Temperature, Mass, Age, and Orbital Separation as Saturn and Jupiter,” Rachel Bowens-Rubin et al 2025 ApJL 986 L26. doi:10.3847/2041-8213/addbde

The post Exo-Saturns and Exo-Jupiters Are Within JWST’s Reach appeared first on AAS Nova.