• Ukraine’s Stetman prepares a 360-satellite network with SpaceX launch support
• New leadership keeps Ukraine’s ambitious satellite project moving forward
• The billion-euro constellation aims to strengthen Ukraine’s communication independence

Ukrainian company Stetman is currently preparing to launch its own low Earth orbit (LEO) satellite constellation, with service set to begin in 2027.

The company recently lost its founder, Dmytro Stetsenko, but the project is still on course after the appointment of a new CEO, Kateryna Diachenko.

According to the company, its planned constellation will orbit at an altitude of approximately 550 kilometers, with a test satellite currently scheduled for launch in October 2026 to validate the underlying technology together with SpaceX engineers.

Constellation with Danish and American partners

Full deployment of the constellation is expected to begin in 2027 and take three full years to complete entirely across the network.

The finished network will ultimately consist of 360 satellites manufactured by the Danish company GomSpace under an ongoing partnership.

Stetman has chosen SpaceX to handle the launches, citing the company's lower cost and stronger reliability compared with rivals.

"SpaceX is the best option, as they are the cheapest and the most reliable," Stetsenko had previously told reporters directly.

No formal agreement has yet been reached covering delivery of the remaining constellation satellites beyond that initial test satellite launch.

Ukraine itself would require roughly 150 satellites, according to Andrii Kolesnyk, a former adviser to the head of Ukraine's State Space Agency.

Diachenko has already met personally with GomSpace representatives to confirm continuity of their joint manufacturing plans going forward into the future.

A billion-Euro project

The total project cost reportedly exceeds one billion euros, though financing will proceed in several separate stages, a Stetman representative said.

That budget reportedly covers the satellite constellation itself, software development, launch services, broker fees, and staff salaries across the entire company workforce.

Manufacturing and launching a single satellite reportedly cost between $2 million and $3 million per unit.

A single SpaceX Falcon 9 rocket can carry several dozen satellites into orbit, and each launch typically costs between $60 million and $70 million depending on payload size.

With a target of 360 satellites, those per-unit costs alone would account for roughly $720 million to over $1 billion of the total budget

Stetman also plans a joint satellite manufacturing facility inside Ukraine alongside GomSpace, expected to fully open next year if funding arrives on schedule.

The factory could require several hundred million euros in investment, although details about funding sources remain undisclosed.

The company currently supplies communication equipment to Ukraine’s military, emergency services, police, medical personnel, and government institutions.

The company also produces modified communication terminals, including Starmod systems designed for military conditions and UASAT satellite terminals operating through existing satellite networks.

These products support Ukraine’s broader effort to strengthen communication independence during wartime.

Via The Defender

The smartphone market is dominated by two main operating system players — with Apple's iOS leading the charge in the mid-2000s and Google's Android following suit, only maturing relatively recently. But Steve Jobs took the news of Android's launch personally, frustrated and betrayed at its development.

Eating machines

The Apple chief was speaking with Walter Isaacson, his biographer, when he shared his exact feelings about Google's development of Android.

Published very shortly after Jobs' death in October 2011, Steve Jobs was based on several exclusive interviews conducted over two years, alongside conversations with more than 100 people who knew the Apple co-founder.

One of the most spicy exchanges involved Jobs vowing to destroy Google for its work developing Android in secret, while Eric Schmidt was also serving on the Apple board. Schmidt offered to resolve the issues with a settlement, but Jobs took it more than personally.

Energy efficiency

Jobs was apparently angry after learning in January 2010 that HTC had introduced an Android smartphone with many of the same popular features in an iPhone.

Reports from the time the comments were made public suggest the episode reflected Jobs' own perspective on a particular breed of profit-driven executives who only cared about making money.

Although iOS enjoyed a reputation for many years during the 200s of being a better platform in most, if not all, quarters, including its overall design philosophy, Android-powered smartphones were significantly cheaper. In the modern era, the Android OS is incredibly intuitive, with different smartphone makers usually looking to Apple for inspiration in designing features for their own custom flavors.

During his tenure as CEO, Tim Cook also pivoted on this approach, softening Apple's stance and settling many of the ongoing legal disputes, including the long-running battle with Samsung.

• US Air Force drone fires live missile during landmark autonomous aircraft test
• Human pilots remain in control despite growing drone autonomy capabilities
• YFQ-44A advances America’s plans for future robotic fighter operations

The US Air Force has successfully tested a Collaborative Combat Aircraft firing a live AIM-120 AMRAAM missile, marking a major step for autonomous combat systems.

The YFQ-44A drone, developed by Anduril Industries, launched the weapon against a digital target over the Mojave Desert during the historic test.

The event moves the Air Force closer to deploying unmanned aircraft designed to support human pilots during future air operations.

AI wingman drone moves from carrying weapons to firing them

The missile launch followed earlier testing phases where engineers confirmed the aircraft could safely carry the weapon and maintain stable flight.

The drone first carried an inert version of the AMRAAM before validating the communication links required between the aircraft, weapon systems, and human operators.

Air Force officials said the test involved more than simply releasing a missile because the weapon successfully tracked the simulated target during the engagement.

General Ken Wilsbach described the event as an important development toward delivering Collaborative Combat Aircraft capabilities to military operators.

"It wasn’t just an AMRAAM that came off, it was tracking the target," Wilsbach said while discussing the test.

The Air Force has stressed that autonomous systems will not independently decide when to fire weapons, as human authorization remains required before any engagement.

The YFQ-44A, also known internally as Fury, is part of the first CCA development phase alongside General Atomics' YFQ-42A Dark Merlin.

These aircraft are designed to operate with crewed fighters such as the F-35 and F-22 by providing additional sensors, weapons, and operational support during missions.

The Air Force expects CCA platforms to perform multiple roles beyond missile carriage, including electronic warfare, reconnaissance, and other battlefield tasks.

Officials believe these aircraft could increase combat effectiveness by allowing pilots to manage several unmanned systems during complex operations.

Air Force expands autonomous aircraft program

The successful missile test comes after the Air Force approved both CCA designs to move toward production in June 2026.

Anduril, Shield AI, and Collins Aerospace are competing to provide autonomous software for the aircraft, while the service continues developing future versions through multiple program increments.

Air Force officials have not disclosed total program costs or production numbers for the first manufacturing phase.

However, budget documents show the service requested about $1.4 billion for CCA development and nearly $1 billion for procurement during fiscal 2027.

The Air Force estimates the drones have reached a cost goal of about one-third of an F-35A fighter, which has an average flyaway cost of around $83 million in its current production lot.

Future CCA designs may require greater range, speed, and electrical power, especially for potential operations in regions where long-range weapons threaten U.S. bases.

However, American lawmakers have argued that future systems will need the ability to deploy from the continental United States and reach distant combat areas.

Via Defence Blog | Breaking Defense

• Ukraine unveils reusable Horynych bomber drones built from civilian aircraft
• Secret drone squadron expands Ukraine's long-range strike capability significantly
• Modified ultralight aircraft now carry full-sized aerial bombs into combat

Ukraine has publicly revealed what appears to be a previously undisclosed squadron of Horynych reusable bomber drones converted from civilian light aircraft for long-range strike operations.

Official images show at least ten modified aircraft carrying Soviet-designed OFAB-100-120 aerial bombs, suggesting the program has expanded beyond isolated experimental missions.

The aircraft are based on SkyRanger Swift and Nynja ultralight airframes originally developed for civilian recreational flying before undergoing military conversion.

Civilian aircraft converted into reusable bomber drones

Engineers replaced conventional cockpit controls with remote piloting equipment and electro-optical cameras, allowing operators to guide the aircraft from the ground throughout bombing missions.

Each aircraft appears to carry one OFAB-100-120 bomb weighing approximately 100kg beneath the fuselage during long-range operations.

Unlike one-way attack drones that are destroyed after striking their objectives, these aircraft are designed to return safely for repeated missions after releasing their payloads.

The appearance of at least ten drones together indicates the capability may have developed into a larger operational force rather than remaining a limited experimental effort.

The absence of leaves on nearby trees suggests the images may have been taken several months before their public release.

If that assessment proves accurate, Ukraine may have maintained this reusable bomber fleet for an extended period before officially revealing its existence.

Reported strike focused attention on expanding deep attack capability

According to Serhii Sternenko, adviser to Ukraine's Defense Minister, the aircraft participated in an overnight strike against an underground Russian logistics facility near Armyansk in occupied Crimea.

Armyansk lies close to the Perekop Isthmus, an important land corridor linking occupied Crimea with Russian-controlled territory and supporting military supply movements across the region.

These underground facilities serve as hardened storage and distribution sites for fuel, ammunition, and military equipment supporting Russian military operations.

The strike was reportedly carried out jointly by Ukraine's Air Force, the Lazar Group, and the Venom Unmanned Systems Center.

Neither Ukraine's military nor its Ministry of Defense has officially confirmed the number of aircraft involved or the extent of damage.

Independent assessments of the reported attack have not yet been published, leaving several key operational details unverified by outside observers.

Ukraine has previously used modified civilian aircraft in long-range strikes, including a June 2025 attack using an A-22 Foxbat towing an unpowered glider.

That glider carried a 100-kilogram warhead and struck a Shahed drone production facility in Alabuga, marking an earlier tandem strike configuration.

Ukraine has also used converted SkyRanger aircraft since 2024, although earlier sightings typically involved individual aircraft rather than a larger operational group.

Whether this expanded Horynych fleet can sustain repeated missions deep inside Russian territory remains unverified without independent confirmation of results.

Ukrainian officials have offered no additional public timeline for when the broader Horynych program might expand its operations further significantly.

There is also no information on the size of the fleet or the extent of damage that it can cause.

• Copenhagen-based Triton Depth, founded in 2025 by three DTU engineering students, has raised €1 million in pre-seed funding
• It aims to address one of the EU's most underserved security concerns: the seabed, as Baltic cable sabotage, shadow-fleet activity, and underwater drone warfare are increasingly growing concerns
• Triton Depth intends to build a scalable network of passive acoustic sensors it calls 'Triton Nodes' to address the issue, leveraging AI to identify vessels and objects in real time

A three-man Danish company founded by students is venturing into a somewhat interesting industry for an EU-based startup: underwater defense.

Triton Depth has received €1 million in pre-seed funding from investors including London-based The Creator Fund and Denmark's state-owned Export and Investment Fund (EIFO), with aims to focus on acoustics to answer what is arguably Europe's biggest security threat in the days to come: drone-based naval warfare and sabotage.

With growing concerns about the vulnerability of the European Union, and by extension, Denmark, to a variety of sea-borne threats, EIFO's investment in Triton Depth might be more than just a value play, but a hallmark of a realization that it needs to tend to its own defense needs even as NATO continues to meander, with the US proving to be a volatile partner of late, to say the least.

Using affordable dual-use acoustic technology as the first line of defense

Triton Depth's approach is appealing for a domestic defense industry that does not share the budgets that larger naval players such as the US, Russia, or China possess: it is simple, yet elegant in its premise, and even partial wins when it comes to its claims would go a long way to safeguard Denmark and the EU's regional interests.

Triton Depth's approach centers around the use and deployment of its 'Triton Nodes', a scalable cluster of low-maintenance passive acoustic sensors that measure sound underwater before feeding information back to an AI model that assesses and classifies signatures it detects in real time.

The company intends to market its product line as a dual-use technology play, with CEO and Co-Founder Carl Borg stating that they aim to build "the intelligence layer for the ocean" for both civilian and defense use cases.

The focus on defense stems from Denmark's own vulnerabilities in the Baltic Sea, which has previously suffered significant economic damage from sabotage, including the destruction of Nord Stream 1 and 2.

With an increasing share of its critical infrastructure, including power interconnectors, data cables, and offshore wind, lying underwater, it could be argued that EIFO's investment is the Danish state safeguarding its own maritime security and intelligence interests by investing in an intelligent tripwire for the future.

Other European governments are also actively seeking scalable, affordable ways to monitor coastal and subsea infrastructure, even as Nordic defense budgets continue to rise, with Triton Depth among many defense infrastructure companies poised to benefit from a renewed focus on maritime security in the region, even as acoustics are seen as a reliable metric to monitor for a variety of infrastructure plays.

It goes without saying that it takes a lot to win the Tour de France, as those who conquer cycling's greatest race have scarified so much in their quest for glory, with every single second counting.

The 2026 race has already started strongly for Tadej Pogačar and his UAE Team Emirates-XRG team, with the Slovenian building a seemingly unsurpassable lead as he bids for his fifth triumph.

But asides from his incredsible physiology and stamina, Pogačar is also boasting another major advance for the 2026 Tour - a customized 3D-printed fizik One-to-One saddle, possibly the most detailed ever made - I spoke to the company to find out more.

Marginal gains

"Small details in the technology might make the difference," Alex Locatelli, Head of Brand at Fizik says, "the marginal gains in this case - comfort is strictly related to performance, as if you are able to forget about this, it's less thought you need to give while you have to focus on another part of training and racing."

3D-printed and adaptive saddles have been around for some time, but Fizik's one-to-one product goes beyond a standard mould, using the company's proprietary pressure-mapping sensor technology (pictured below) to create a hyper-customized product designed specifically for an individual rider's anatomy and riding style.

Locatelli notes each saddle takes around two to three weeks to produce, but certain VIPs (such as a multi-Tour winner) can get their products rushed through.

"We have a very good relationship with Tadej," he says, "that's something that's not easy to achieve...as a matter of fact, the team principal told me it's very rare that Tadej is so enthusiastic about a product - sometimes he's not even happy after winning the Tour de France, he's so demanding to the team and to himself."

"We are offering thr top of the pyramid when it comes to the technology," Locatelli says, noting that the saddle may be the next in a series of upgrades used by Pogačar that his rivals may soon look to copy.

But even the standard saddles Fizik produces in the future will benefit from the pressure-mapping data the company is collecting now, as it all goes in to future production and product development.

The technology is so precise and advanced right now that it may be a while before we see such innovations trickle down to us everyday cyclists, but I have to ask Locatelli if there's a future for park cyclists like myself ever getting hyper-personalized 3D-printed components.

He notes that it may take a few years, but adds, "general customization in cycling is expanding," highlighting how some smaller manufacturers are offering more options in terms of custom frames and saddles.

So you never know - the next bike you buy could be the most personal ever - but it might not let you ride quite as fast as Tadej Pogačar.

And an AI-designed helmet for good measure

However Pogačar won't just have fizik's individually-sculpted saddle to help him try and win this year's Tour. For stage 5 of the 2026 race, UAE Team Emirates-XRG also revealed a new helmet designed by AI.

Specifically designed by Helmetverse, the AI-powered design platform of tech group and team sponsor G42, and built by MET Helmets, the helmet was created in collaboration with AI artist Gizem Akdag, who says they were, "inspired by the transition from city to signal and from data to light", as the kit's "visual language captures the speed, energy and flow of professional cycling, translating movement and performance".

“The reaction to Helmetverse last year showed how passionate cycling fans are about engaging with our sport in new ways. As a team, we are always looking to push boundaries, whether that's through performance, innovation or fan engagement," said Mauro Gianetti, Team Principal and CEO of UAE Team Emirates-XRG. "Helmetverse reflects that mindset and gives cycling fans an opportunity to leave their mark on the team.”

Fans of the team can also now submit their own helmet designs, including creating their own using Helmetverse AI, with the winning design worn by UAE Team Emirates-XRG at the UAE Tour in February 2027.

• NHS warns curiosity over patient records could end healthcare careers permanently
• Jail time now joins dismissal for unlawful access to confidential medical records
• High-profile crime victims' records triggered tougher NHS privacy enforcement nationwide

NHS England has launched a nationwide campaign warning staff that accessing patient records without proper legal justification could end their careers.

The initiative includes screensavers and posters across NHS organisations reminding workers not to let curiosity override professional and legal boundaries.

Staff who breach these confidentiality rules risk disciplinary action, dismissal, regulatory referral, or even imprisonment under existing data protection legislation.

A response to recent high-profile breaches

The campaign follows several recent dismissals linked to staff who unlawfully viewed records connected to victims of high-profile crimes nationwide.

NHS England specifically cited unlawful access incidents involving the 2023 Nottingham attacks and the 2024 Southport knife attack, both of which drew significant national attention.

“Patients must be able to trust that their personal information is kept confidential by the NHS – any instance of staff looking at records without a valid reason is wholly unacceptable, a disgraceful breach of patients’ trust and against the law,” said Sir Jim Mackey, NHS Chief Executive.

He added that most staff manage patient information appropriately, although a limited group has seriously damaged that confidence through inappropriate access.

New guidance has now been issued outlining different categories of unlawful access, alongside advice on monitoring and conducting regular audits.

Some newer electronic patient record systems can reportedly flag suspicious activity in real time, helping organisations identify unauthorised access quickly.

Breaches can be reported to both the Information Commissioner's Office (ICO) and police, who may pursue criminal prosecution under the Data Protection Act 2018.

Legal consequences and independent findings

The ICO reiterated the expectations of patients and staff, as well as the consequences of this illegal action.

“When people seek medical care, they share some of their most sensitive personal information in the trust that it will be kept safe,” said Paul Arnold, Chief Executive of the ICO.

“Unauthorised access to those records is not just a breach of data protection law — it is a betrayal of that trust, with real and lasting consequences for patients and their families…Staff who breach that trust face serious consequences: loss of employment, removal of professional accreditation and criminal prosecution.”

The temptation to access patient records unlawfully often increases when cases attract widespread public attention.

"When a local incident becomes national news – a serious crime, a public tragedy, a story that captures widespread attention – there is an increased risk that healthcare staff could be tempted to look at records they have no reason to view," Arnold added.

“Anyone considering accessing records for personal reasons or out of curiosity should be in no doubt they could be putting their career at risk, and may face disciplinary action, dismissal, referral to the regulator or even time in prison,” said Sir Jim Mackey.

Findings show that 18 staff members at York and Scarborough Teaching Hospitals wrongfully accessed patient records since 2021.

Eight of those 18 cases were subsequently referred onward to the ICO for further formal investigation.

Another investigation began after up to 40 staff members reportedly accessed the medical records of a three-year-old boy injured in a crocodile enclosure incident near Huntingdon.

Cambridge University Hospitals said restrictions had already been placed on the child's records and confirmed any staff lacking legitimate clinical or operational reasons would face disciplinary action, including dismissal.

Offences under the Data Protection Act 2018 and Computer Misuse Act 1990 can carry fines and prison sentences for those convicted.

The scale of these repeated incidents suggests that existing safeguards have not consistently deterred staff from unlawfully viewing sensitive records.

“Having the ability to view a record is not the same as having a legitimate need to do so. Every member of staff has a personal responsibility to respect that boundary…” Arnold added.

• Survey inds 69% of Americans support Bernie Sanders’ policy of requiring AI firms to transfer 50% of their stock to a public fund
• Respondents are also overwhelmingly in favor of giving the federal government the power to block new AI services deemed “risky”
• Support does appear to drop when Sanders' name is mentioned

AI is developing an image problem, and respondents to a new survey have made their feelings clear: Bernie Sanders’ demand that AI firms contribute stock to a massive public fund is widely supported.

Conducted during June 2026 by the nonpartisan survey research company Verasight, the survey consisted of 17 questions sent to 1,690 adults (18 and above), finding over two-thirds (69%) supporting Sanders’ policy – a figure that only drops to 64% once it is revealed which politician the idea is associated with.

The bad news for the AI industry doesn’t end there, as respondents demonstrated a notable distrust for how AI companies conduct themselves, with nearly half (43%) believing that the regulations proposed by the AI companies are designed to benefit those same companies. Incredibly, 30% of respondents trust the US federal government more than companies like OpenAI and Anthropic.

How does AI wealth distribution work?

Senator Bernie Sanders’ plan gives the public a direct stake in America’s largest AI companies, with a one-off tax paid not in cash, but in stock. "Since AI is built on the collective knowledge of humanity, the wealth it generated must benefit humanity," he said, announcing his planned Act on social media.

This would, according to Sanders’ proposal, deliver an annual $1000 check to U.S. citizens, and fund healthcare and education.

"The findings from our latest survey demonstrate a rare instance of bipartisan agreement," noted Ben Leff, CEO and Co-Founder of Verasight.

"There is an undeniable desire among Americans of both parties for federal oversight, absolute transparency, and accountability to ensure AI safety and to enable all Americans to participate in the economic benefits of AI."

Even with a polarizing figure like Bernie Sanders attached, the wealth fund idea retains support, which suggests that while people are happy to use AI to answer questions, streamline processes, and make tasks quicker, they’re less comfortable with the industry’s wider impact.

A poor public perception

While AI companies are becoming increasingly unpopular, it isn’t all bad news. The survey quizzed subjects about their feelings on other industries, including tobacco, pharmaceuticals, and casinos, along with social media. If the tide is turning against AI, it still isn’t regarded as poorly as casinos or tobacco.

Feelings about AI companies are also notably more positive than social media. Given the concerns expressed about federal oversight and public wealth funds, there could be an avenue for OpenAI, Google Gemini, Anthropic, Microsoft, and others to improve the general feeling about AI: accepting a degree of social responsibility.

• JPMorgan CEO Jamie Dimon warns controls may be needed for Claude Mythos
• The AI model from Anthropic is highly advanced, and has been proven to detect zero-day vulnerabilities and even develop working exploits
• The US government has previously instructed Anthropic to block access to foreign nationals, citing security concerns

Artificial intelligence is becoming increasingly powerful, a fact highlighted with the US government’s recent instruction to limit access to Anthropic’s Claude Mythos model.

Now, the CEO of JPMorgan has described the risks the technology poses as a “real issue,” and likened wide access to the AI as “giving ballistic ⁠missiles to individuals.”

Speaking at the Pennsylvania Defense ​and Innovation Summit, JPMorgan’s Jamie Dimon underscored the risks posed by the AI, which has already been shown to both identify and exploit cybersecurity challenges.

Mythos isn’t Skynet

Currently, Claude Mythos is limited to a small selection of organizations, companies, and federal and military departments. Public access to the AI has been blocked, and worldwide access has been blocked due to the potential security issues of this powerful AI.

Claude Mythos is not the type of threat that can become self-aware and take over military appliances like the fictional Skynet of the Terminator movie series. However, it does have the capacity to cause immense damage in the wrong hands.

The AI is capable of detecting cybersecurity vulnerabilities and reporting on them; it is also able to generate automatic exploits. So, for white hat cybersecurity analysts, it is a powerful defensive tool, but in the wrong hands, it is a destructive power. In addition, its automated capabilities make it easy for black hats to scale their cybercrime operation and make ransomware, phishing, and other data-based scams more profitable.

It isn’t just cybersecurity where Anthropic’s Claude Mythos AI has demonstrated such incredible capacities. Scientific research, specifically biology, can be targeted by attackers using AI to turn complex concepts into terms, potentially to misuse the information.

There is also the challenge of a strategic imbalance between single nations or bodies having exclusive access to the technology.

Will the public ever access Anthropic’s Claude Mythos?

Given the security considerations, it seems unlikely that Claude Mythos will be publicy available anytime soon. However, Anthropic has already stated that it intends Mythos-level features and capabilities to become more widely available.

For this to happen, however, it needs to develop and apply various safeguards.

The most likely scenario is that public access to Mythos is eventually unblocked, with restrictions to specific features that relate to cybersecurity and biological/medical tasks and research.

Project Glasswing is already in operation with a handful of key partners (including Amazon Web Services, Anthropic, Apple, Broadcom, Cisco, CrowdStrike, and others), and will probably be expanded until the safeguards are demonstrated to be fit for purpose, and public use.

Via Reuters

If you're looking for reliable backup power for home use, travel, or emergencies, I've found a great deal on the Jackery HomePower 3000 for $1189 (was $1299) at Wellbots with code NEW10.

The portable power station (which is the same hardware sold elsewhere as the Explorer 3000 V2), is a practical investment for home backup, camping, RV travel, and job sites.

The HomePower 3000 packs a huge 3072Wh battery and delivers 3600W of continuous AC output with a 7200W peak surge. That's enough to run everything from refrigerators and microwaves to power tools, air conditioners, and other demanding appliances.

Today's top Jackery portable power station deal

Despite its large capacity, the unit can recharge from a standard AC outlet in around 2.4 hours, while solar charging is also supported through Jackery's SolarSaga panels.

Pairing it with compatible solar panels gives you a renewable way to keep the battery topped up when you're away from a mains electricity supply.

There's no shortage of connectivity either. You get five AC outlets, including a NEMA TT-30 outlet for RVs, alongside two 100W USB-C ports, two USB-A ports, two DC5521 outputs, and a 12V car socket.

The power station can supply up to 10 devices simultaneously, making it useful for families, remote workers, photographers, and tradespeople.

Jackery has also focused on usability and durability. Wi-Fi and Bluetooth connectivity allow you to monitor battery levels, charging status, and power usage through the companion smartphone app, while a quiet charging mode operates at under 30dB, making it suitable for indoor use.

Advanced battery management, UL certification, and a battery rated for 4,000 charge cycles help ensure long-term reliability.

Weighing 27kg, the HomePower 3000 is still portable enough to transport between locations while offering enough energy storage to handle extended outages or demanding workloads.

In his review of the Explorer 3000 V2 (same as the HomePower 3000), our expert Jack said, "High output and high storage mean that this is superb for most home uses in an emergency or using off peak charging to use during the day."

If you've been considering a high-capacity portable power station that combines fast charging, strong output, and broad connectivity, I can wholeheartedly recommend this model.

For more choices, check out the best portable power stations we've tested and reviewed.

Also consider: More portable power station deals

• Shop all the portable power stations at Wellbots

• DataDome analysis claims agentic traffic has surged by 45% in Q2 2026
• Meta AI bots have grown over 163% on the previous quarter
• The analysis was conducted by bot management and agent control platform DataDome

If you run a website, every crawl costs bandwidth, resources, logging, and creates CDN transactions, and while search engine crawlers offered the promise of sending visitors, AI bots do not.

Analysis in a report from cybersecurity firm DataDome has shown that while bots from Meta AI have increased activity, they’re not delivering any significant returns to websites.

Conversely, ChatGPT crawlers have reduced in traffic, but are sending more referrals.

AI agent traffic is growing

While Meta AI is usually considered to be the “chatbot within Facebook” it seems that it is becoming something more – and the emergence of the Meta-WebIndexer bot (which grew 163% on Q1) suggests that Meta may be indexing a library of websites, in much the same way Google has done for the past few decades.

The growth of Meta AI as an active crawler is only part of the story, as is ChatGPT’s comparative efficiency. The OpenAI tool seems to know enough about websites, so can provide the answers it already “knows.” Conversely, Meta AI’s activity indexing the web seems to explain its heavy impact in Q2 2026.

But also emerging is the Model Context Protocol (MCP) signal, which connects AI agents with external tools, and differs from standard crawler traffic.

“Q2 showed us that the ground is shifting faster than most organizations realize. Meta now dominates AI traffic on our network, MCP traffic has emerged as a real signal, and ChatGPT is driving more referral value with fewer crawls," noted Jérôme Segura, VP of Threat Research at DataDome.

The differences in the way the AI agents are interacting with websites – some behaving like users, others scraping content – means that organizations need to act accordingly.

“What the data makes clear is that not all agents are created equal. The organizations building policy around these distinctions are the ones gaining an edge, and that's exactly why agent trust adoption is accelerating."

Unfortunately, MCP’s existence and growth into a significant, measurable quantity, means that it should also be treated as part of an organization’s attack surface.

Allocating resources

Given the origins of the report, there is naturally a cybersecurity aspect to this. While ransomware, malware, and phishing are not going anywhere, autonomous software on the web needs addressing in a different way.

Those “organizations building policy” that Segura mentions might, for example, give full crawl access to Google, allow ChatGPT to retrieve results, but rate-limit Meta AI based on its poor return.

Meanwhile, unknown agents – perhaps cybersecurity threats – would require additional verification or be blocked entirely.

• An internal DHS readout shows analysts twice dismissed intrusion alerts on the HSIN information-sharing network as false positives
• This effectively gave hackers roughly three weeks of undetected access before a breach was declared on June 4 2026
• The as-yet anonymous attackers altered server files, ran malicious code through a legitimate web-server program, deleted logs, installed backdoors, and stole credential files

Hackers managed to find their way into the US Department of Homeland Security's primary information sharing platform, gaining unfettered access to the HSIN network that hosts unclassified information that multiple US agencies and international rely on.

The hack allowed the attackers to modify server files, run malicious code and steal credential files while installing backdoors and deleting logs to remove their digital footprint.

Their movements were flagged twice by automated systems and analysts in May 2026, before being dismissed as a false positive each time before an active breach was declared a month later.

Bad timing meets bad security practices?

The timing and specifics of this intrusion are, in particular, details which could prove to be embarrassing for the US government.

Not only does the HSIN network serve as a key intelligence-sharing tool for both domestic and international partners during the FIFA World Cup, but it also hosts information on other major events, such as America250.

The fact that the hack was picked up not once, but twice by flags before being dismissed as a false positive raises competency concerns for an instance that has already sparked interest, with the House Homeland Security Committee staff having already requested a briefing on the intrusion.

The DHS, for its part, is downplaying the incident, with a spokesperson confirming it but characterizing it narrowly: the department is "aware of a recent cyber incident involving a specific, unclassified legacy information sharing environment" and states there is no indication that classified networks were affected.

This viewpoint is countered by Senate Intelligence Committee Vice Chairman Mark Warner, who argued the platform's sensitivity outstrips its classification level, saying that the information in HSIN, "while not classified, is highly sensitive, and its exposure risks national security."

Investigators have yet to identify or assign blame to a particular hacking group or organization, adding to the chaos in determining motive. The hackers have deleted logs on servers, which only adds to the confusion here.

Major implications

The important question, perhaps, is not how the breach happened, but why confusion and mischaracterization of the security lapse allowed it to become a much bigger issue than it would have been if it had been contained from the start. Despite security flags and analysts highlighting the breach as early as the 15th of May, the hackers essentially had free rein to operate until at least the 3rd of June thanks to initial reports being dismissed as false positives.

HSIN as a platform handles event security planning, interagency coordination, threat information, and details on persons of interest. Whether any of that material was actually copied remains unknown. Investigators have not determined what, if anything, was exfiltrated, though the theft of credential files is itself telling: attackers who steal credentials are, almost by definition, trying to reach systems and accounts beyond their initial foothold.

This is not the first time HSIN has been compromised, with two documented previous incidents, including a compromised account in 2009 and misconfigured access in 2023, that have resulted in intentional and unintentional breaches of the network.

The issue is only exacerbated by the fact that the DHS, along with its cybersecurity agency, CISA, has absorbed significant workforce cuts over the past year, potentially weakening its defenses against sophisticated hacks that require manual human intervention or oversight to detect, even when the correct flags (which triggered as intended) are already in place.

Such manpower shortages have also been politically polarizing in the US Congress and may be highlighted when the department provides more detailed information about the hack in the coming days, even as the Pentagon deals with its own OPSEC issues that are also being aired in the same forum.

Via DefenseOne

If you want a projector for presentations, business, and streaming movies without paying 4K prices, this is the deal I recommend grabbing right now.

Super-bright compared to similarly priced models, the Xgimi Horizon is now $529 (was $899) at Wellbots — a $370 saving on a 1080p Android TV projector with built-in Harman Kardon sound.

Brightness is where this model earns its keep: 2200 ANSI lumens is well above what budget projectors in this range typically offer. That ANSI-lumen brightness (a more rigorous measurement than the inflated "LED lumens" figures some cheaper projectors use) is important. That gives it good use for business and presentations, since the picture holds up reasonably well even with some ambient light in the room, not just in a fully dark home theater setup.

Today's top Xgimi projector deal

One thing worth clearing up first: despite some marketing copy floating around describing this as a 4K projector, the Horizon's native resolution is 1920 x 1080 — this is Xgimi's entry-level Horizon, not the 4K "Horizon Pro" that sits above it in the line-up. If you specifically need native 4K, this isn't that projector. But for presenting or streaming Full HD content, 1080p from a bright, well-built projector at this price is a genuinely great deal.

The built-in Harman Kardon speaker setup is a real convenience feature — two 8W drivers with Dolby Audio and DTS-HD support mean you don't need a soundbar or external speakers just to get a watchable experience out of the box.

The setup features are also worth calling out: auto focus, auto keystone correction, and intelligent screen alignment handle the fiddly parts of projector setup automatically, and obstacle avoidance helps the image adjust around furniture in the frame rather than requiring a perfectly clear wall.

One honest caveat beyond the resolution: Our own testing of the pricier Horizon Pro found that if you're mostly watching Full HD content rather than 4K, the standard non-Pro Horizon is actually the smarter buy — which lines up well with what this deal is offering. Just don't expect the sharper 4K detail of Xgimi's higher-end models at this price.

For a bright, well-connected 1080p smart projector with genuinely good built-in sound, the Xgimi Horizon at $529 is a smart buy. And for other top-performing picks, see our guide to the best portable projectors.

• See all tech deals at Wellbots.