Editor’s Note: Astrobites is a graduate-student-run organization that digests astrophysical literature for undergraduate students. As part of the partnership between the AAS and astrobites, we occasionally repost astrobites content here at AAS Nova. We hope you enjoy this post from astrobites; the original can be viewed at astrobites.org.

Title: Dynamics of Planetary Rings Under Thermal Forces
Authors: Wen-Han Zhou et al.
First Author’s Institution: The University of Tokyo
Status: Published in ApJL

If you ask anyone what their favourite planet is, the answer you’ll most likely hear is Saturn. Why? Why else than the beautiful and intricate ring system surrounding the gas giant. The other gas and ice giants in our solar system — Jupiter, Uranus, and Neptune — have ring systems themselves but none quite as striking as Saturn’s. Would it surprise you to learn that astronomers’ best models have not yet totally explained why Saturn’s rings look the way they do?

In contrast, it may not surprise you to hear that people have been trying to explain the rings for as long as we have seen them with telescopes. We now know that planetary rings are collections of relatively small particles (think micrometre up to metre sized), most likely having once been the material of a larger body that was disrupted either by collisions or tidal forces. This material, due to the gravity of its local planet, is sculpted into a flat disc where more subtle interactions then lead to substructure forming within the disc such as gaps and ringlets. Many of these substructures are explained by well-understood physics — for example gaps being carved by embedded moonlets or resonances sculpting ring edges — though there remain some outstanding problems in our understanding.

The authors of today’s article set their sights on the problematic inner edge of Saturn’s A ring (Figure 1). They describe some mechanisms — namely the collisions of micrometeoroids within the rings — by which a sharp ring edge can be maintained, but there exists a gap in the understanding of how such an edge can form in the first place. All hope is not lost, though, as today’s authors reintroduce a physical process they call the “eclipse–Yarkovsky” effect, which seems to explain these phenomena.

Billions of Rocket-Powered Bumper Cars

The idea behind this process revolves entirely around light. When sunlight hits a particle within a planetary ring, non-absorbed sunlight imparts a little “bump” onto a particle, ever so slightly altering its trajectory. At the same time, some of the sunlight is absorbed into the particle, which heats it up; light is soon re-emitted via thermal radiation, which, again, can slightly change the trajectory of these tiny particles. From a point on the surface of each ring particle (see rightmost side of Figure 2), the photons from this thermal radiation are all emitted in random directions; however, across the whole surface of the particle there is a net force! These tiny particles are spinning, and so the side just near “sunset” is hottest and emitting the most thermal photons. In this way, the pressure from the sunlight plus the thermal radiation of each particle imparts a net torque on the ring itself which changes the angular momentum of the ring.

What we described just then is essentially solar radiation pressure plus the Yarkovsky effect. It turns out that the net force from this process typically averages out to zero as the ring particles orbit around the planet. This assumes, though, that the sunlight is constantly shining on the ring. Stunning imagery of Saturn tells us that this isn’t the case, so what happens when we take into account the shadow cast on the ring from the planet? Today’s authors find that the net effect induces a positive change in angular momentum of the ring particles, which they call the eclipse–Yarkovsky effect.

After today’s authors detailed all of the math involved in this process (and there is a lot), they put it into practice to try to help explain Saturn’s curious rings. Including the eclipse–Yarkovsky effect together with other known effects that drive ring evolution allowed them to reproduce the optical depth profile (how thick the ring looks) of Saturn’s A ring better than ever before (notably the sharp inner edge in Figure 3). On top of this, the effect provides another avenue for moonlet formation in the outer edges of ring systems as the positive torque from the effect drives material out toward and away from the Roche limit.

Undeniably useful for Saturn, the eclipse–Yarkovsky effect may also explain some other conundra in the solar system. Mars may have once had rings, which are thought to have eventually clumped together to form the inner moon Phobos. This idea is problematic, though, in that current models suggest there should still be some residual ring system around Mars even after Phobos formed. Enter the eclipse–Yarkovsky effect: being 100 times stronger for Mars than Saturn (due to its more intense incident sunlight), the effect may have driven out and dispersed that residual ring altogether. While the authors are currently looking into this possibility, the reintroduction of the eclipse–Yarkovsky effect has already shown great promise for our most beautiful ringed planetary neighbour.

Original astrobite edited by Wasi Naqvi.

About the author, Ryan White:

I am a first-year PhD student at Macquarie University in Australia, working mainly on binary/multiple systems with massive stars (Wolf–Rayets in particular!). Outside of study, I’m probably drinking coffee, baking, reading, or going for a run. You can also find me procrastinating on Bluesky @astroryan.bsky.social.

The post Shining a Light on the Shadowy Movements in Saturn’s Rings appeared first on AAS Nova.

Editor’s Note: Astrobites is a graduate-student-run organization that digests astrophysical literature for undergraduate students. As part of the partnership between the AAS and astrobites, we occasionally repost astrobites content here at AAS Nova. We hope you enjoy this post from astrobites; the original can be viewed at astrobites.org.

Title: A Panchromatic JWST Spectrum of a Giant Starspot on the Fully Convective M Dwarf TOI-3884
Authors: C. A. Murray et al.
First Author’s Institution: University of Colorado Boulder
Status: Published in ApJ

We often picture stars as smooth, glowing spheres, as if they’ve been run through an Instagram filter. But real stars have spots: cooler, darker regions on a star’s surface caused by strong magnetic fields.

Annoyingly, these spots can seriously interfere with how we study exoplanet atmospheres.

How to Probe a Planetary Atmosphere

Planetary atmospheres are often probed through transmission spectroscopy. When a planet transits its star, some starlight passes through the planet’s atmosphere before reaching us. We can distinguish the light that has passed through the planet’s atmosphere by comparing the star’s light in transit versus out of transit. In doing so, we can isolate the atmospheric spectrum and look for absorption features of species like water or oxygen.

Easy, right?

How Starspots Get in the Way

Things get more complicated once we stop thinking of the star as if it’s been smoothed out by an Instagram filter. Starspots are cooler than the surrounding stellar surface, which means they emit a different spectrum. They are also constantly changing: new spots can form, old ones can disappear, and the star’s rotation carries them in and out of view. This changes things.

First of all, your star’s spectrum changes over time, which could mean that the star’s spectrum out of transit is not the same as the star’s spectrum during transit. On the other hand, the planet may transit across a starspot instead of a “normal” stellar region. In this case, the light we measure during the transit is affected by the spot, and it is no longer accurate to directly compare it with the overall stellar light outside the transit.

Ultimately, absorption features that we thought were from the planetary atmosphere could actually be coming from starspot contamination instead.

Starspot Models: Our Solution?

To deal with this, astronomers build starspot models, where they vary the spots in terms of the following:

• The surface covering fraction: this parameter tells us how much of the stellar surface is covered in spots
• The temperature contrast: this parameter tells us how much cooler (in ratio) the spot is compared to the rest of the stellar surface, and by proxy how much dimmer

These models are promising, but how do we know that we have chosen the right parameters?

A Unique Laboratory: TOI-3884

The TOI-3884 system is a unique laboratory for testing our starspot models. As seen in Figure 1, it has very convenient starspot geometry, with a large starspot located close to its pole. On top of that, we observe this star almost completely pole-on, which means that we always see this starspot, no matter how much the star rotates. To top this all off, the star hosts a close-in planet, which orbits the star from pole to pole.

The planet transits the star, and as it does so, it always passes over the polar starspot. This gives us a rare opportunity to probe the spectrum of a starspot. Similar to how we can use normal in/out of transit observations to probe a planetary atmosphere, we can now compare the observations during/after a “starspot transit” to probe the starspot region. Today’s authors do exactly this using six different transit observations from JWST.

So… How Good Are Our Models?

From the JWST observations, the authors extract a starspot spectrum for the first time. Figure 2 shows this as the spot contrast (how much dimmer the spot is than the surrounding stellar surface) plotted across different wavelengths. To see how well our models are doing, they compare this observed spectrum to two commonly used starspot models. The difference between the data and the models (the residual) is plotted in the lower panel.

At wavelengths longer than about 1 micron, in the near-infrared regime, things look good! The residuals stay small, meaning the models do a solid job reproducing the observations. But move left into shorter wavelengths, in the optical regime, and the agreement quickly falls apart. The residuals grow, and it becomes clear that the models are missing something.

There’s still work to be done before we can confidently probe planetary atmospheres at optical wavelengths without worrying about stellar contamination, and this observed starspot spectrum provides a unique benchmark to test future starspot models. For now, the near-infrared remains a safer and more reliable window for planet atmosphere studies.

Original astrobite edited by Natalie Price.

About the author, Elise Koo:

I’m a PhD student at the University of Amsterdam, working to detect magnetic interactions between stars and their planets using radio and spectroscopic observations. Outside of research, I like to try out a variety of sports.

The post The First Starspot Spectrum Revealed by JWST appeared first on AAS Nova.

Editor’s Note: Astrobites is a graduate-student-run organization that digests astrophysical literature for undergraduate students. As part of the partnership between the AAS and astrobites, we occasionally repost astrobites content here at AAS Nova. We hope you enjoy this post from astrobites; the original can be viewed at astrobites.org.

Title: Retrieving the Red Edge on Earth-Like Planets with Heterogeneous Clouds and Surfaces
Authors: Zachary Burr et al.
First Author’s Institution: Jet Propulsion Laboratory; ETH Zurich
Status: Published in ApJ

In the next 25 years, astronomers could find signs of life on other planets with the launch of the Habitable Worlds Observatory. Atmospheric signs of life, known as atmospheric biosignatures, are how astronomers currently search for life on other planets. Figure 1 shows examples of atmospheric biosignatures with pictures of each chemical’s origin on Earth. Before E.T. can phone home, though, we have to understand what chemicals make up a planet’s atmosphere. To do this, astronomers can use spectroscopy to observe a planet’s atmosphere in different wavelengths and measure the types and quantities of chemicals present.

There are many ways to observe the spectrum of a planet, but the one you’re probably most familiar with is transmission spectroscopy. You can learn more about transmission spectroscopy of exoplanet atmospheres and how to model transmission spectra with these bites: 1, 2, 3. However, all of the current techniques for exoplanet spectroscopy (including transmission spectroscopy) measure the star’s light and how the planet affects the star’s light. This means it’s heavily dependent on how we model the star’s light to indirectly observe the planet’s light. The only way to take the spectrum of a planet directly is with direct imaging: the technique that the future Habitable Worlds Observatory will use to find signs of life in planetary spectra.

But are atmospheric biosignatures the only way to tell if life exists on other planets? Short answer: absolutely not. Let’s take Earth as an example. If we imagine Earth as a directly imaged exoplanet and take spectra of the light it reflects, you’ll find that around near-infrared wavelengths (~700 nanometers or just past the red part of the visible light spectrum), the light reflected off of Earth increases sharply. This sharp increase is called the vegetation red edge and is caused by plant and ocean life on Earth’s surface as shown in Figure 2. This is made possible because chlorophyll (the thing that makes plants green) absorbs nearly all visible light but reflects near-infrared light. The vegetation red edge is an example of a surface biosignature. In today’s article, the authors determine if the vegetation red edge will be visible in spectra of Earth-like exoplanets!

Snapshots

Planets rotate; that’s how we have morning, noon, and night in 24 hours guaranteed. This means that different parts of the surface will be visible at different times when we take spectra. Sometimes, we may see more ocean than land, other times not. To determine if the vegetation red edge would be visible at all points in Earth’s day, the authors simulated nine different spectra of modern-day Earth representing nine snapshots of Earth’s rotation. Additionally, they also simulated a time-averaged spectrum that shows an entire Earth day in one snapshot without the time variability. These spectra are shown in Figure 3.

The authors then run retrieval models on all nine spectra to see if the vegetation red edge would be detectable in each spectrum, including the time-averaged one. Retrieval models take into account characteristics of the planet that would affect how light moves through its atmosphere, such as the atmospheric chemicals present and the surface gravity. They then use this information to generate possible spectral models that could fit the data. The best-fit model allows astronomers to infer what the atmosphere is made of and properties of the planet such as surface gravity. Because we are looking at Earth in visible light, much of the light from the planet is reflected. Typically, models of Earth-like planets in visible wavelengths only include atmospheric albedo: the measure of how reflective a planet’s atmosphere is. However, surface biosignatures can also be reflective as shown by the vegetation red edge. The authors use this to their advantage and introduce a surface albedo into their model that changes with the amount of desert, vegetation, and ocean visible on Earth’s surface at that time. They then further divide the nine spectra into three different types based upon the visible surface: majority land; 50% land, 50% ocean; and majority ocean. Check out the article online to see a cool animation of the Earth rotating and how the spectrum looks different at each time!

Arr! There Be… Vegetables?

After running the models, the authors were able to detect a sharp increase in the surface albedo value in every spectrum, including the time-averaged one. This result is shown in Figure 4. The authors take this result one step further in order to validate that the vegetation red edge is actually a result of surface variation of vegetation. They re-run models on each of their spectra but instead include a constant surface albedo instead of a time-varying one. This resulted in incorrectly measured radii, chemicals, and surface gravity in nearly all of the models. Without the vegetation red edge and surface features, the models could not accurately determine if life was present on Earth.

For the first time (to the author’s knowledge), the vegetation red edge has been shown to be a promising and observable biosignature in Earth-like atmospheres. This study has also laid the groundwork for future work on other surface biosignatures and their potential impact on spectra of habitable planets. Confirming signs of life in multiple different ways, both on the surface and in the atmosphere, will finally allow astronomers to say we are not alone in the universe. In fact, life likes to live on the (red) edge!

Original astrobite edited by Madison VanWyngarden.

About the author, Kaz Gary:

I am a fourth-year PhD candidate at The Ohio State University with a passion for planets. My current work focuses on modeling exoplanet observations for the Habitable Worlds Observatory and understanding planetary atmospheres. Outside of research, I help develop planetarium shows and love all forms of science communication. In my free time, I enjoy playing tabletop RPGs, painting, watching terrible reality TV, and hanging out with my pet hedgehog.

The post Life on the (Red) Edge appeared first on AAS Nova.

Editor’s Note: Astrobites is a graduate-student-run organization that digests astrophysical literature for undergraduate students. As part of the partnership between the AAS and astrobites, we occasionally repost astrobites content here at AAS Nova. We hope you enjoy this post from astrobites; the original can be viewed at astrobites.org.

Title: Shocks, Winds, and a Torus: The Large Binocular Telescope Interferometer (LBTI) Resolves the Active Nucleus of NGC 4151
Authors: Jacob W. Isbell et al.
First Author’s Institution: University of Arizona
Status: Published in ApJ

At the centre of nearly every galaxy lies a supermassive black hole that dominates this innermost region. Not only is there this millions-of-solar-masses dark beast, but usually too a whole bunch of stuff — stars, gas, dust, and more — which is often quite bright! When there is plenty of this material quite close to the black hole, we believe physics takes control to flatten it into a family of disk and toroidal structures in what we call the unified model of active galactic nuclei (AGNs; see Figure 1).

When astronomers look at different active galaxies (read: galaxies with active supermassive black holes at their core), we see a range of phenomenologies related to their brightness, spectra, morphologies, and more. The unified model of AGNs seeks to explain these different AGN appearances simultaneously by positing that they all have the same physical structure, and we are just viewing them from different angles, hence seeing different features.

The cores of AGNs are often imaged at the smallest scales (e.g., their accretion disks, viewed with interferometers like the Very Large Telescope Interferometer) and the largest scales (e.g., their relativistic jets, viewed with radio interferometers), but comparatively less effort has gone to directly observing the predicted dusty tori in the mid-infrared. That is exactly what today’s authors set out to do using the Large Binocular Telescope Interferometer (LBTI) — a pair of 8.4-metre-aperture mirrors separated by just over 14 metres and combined to simulate a telescope effectively 29 metres wide. This lets astronomers take direct images at a much higher resolution than a smaller-aperture telescope, and hence directly peer into the region around AGNs where this dusty torus should lie.

Today’s authors turn the LBTI towards NGC 4151, a medium-luminosity AGN. With the large effective aperture of the LBTI, they were able to resolve scales in the AGN region as small as 4.4–9.1 pc, about 14–30 light-years depending on the wavelength (see Figure 2), in the mid-infrared. These observations revealed warm dust emission in a complex structure around the central supermassive black hole. The authors note a central bar at all wavelengths, with a significant extension of cool dust arcing to the west (right in the image) and warmer dust localised to the centre (as evident by 3.7- and 4.8-micron emission only nearest to the supermassive black hole and its accretion disk).

To explain the observed morphology in Figure 1, the authors compare three different interpretations based on this new high-resolution imagery together with the results of previous studies looking at other scales and the spectrum of the AGN core. Each interpretation is illustrated and briefed in Figure 3. The first interpretation is in keeping with the unified model of AGNs: a geometrically and optically thick torus of dust surrounds the inner region. In this interpretation, the surface of the dusty torus re-radiates light from the accretion disk to produce most of the mid-infrared emission. Additional mid-infrared emission could come from localised concentrations of gas or interactions between the outflow and the jet. The authors immediately disfavour this explanation, as other studies have shown bright ionised emission at the location of the would-be torus, which is not expected if an optically thick torus were to be present. Hence, these new observations somewhat challenge the one “flavour” of the unified model of AGNs.

The second interpretation aligns with a different version of the unified model: one in which a geometrically thin disk replaces a thick torus around the AGN core. Provided the disk is optically thin too, the authors favour this approach as it is consistent with the geometry of ionised emission that worked against the first interpretation. While other studies suggest that this thin disk should be optically thick, this morphology is at least better aligned with what we see in other AGNs.

The third interpretation suggests that the emission comes from only the radiation pressure–driven wind emanating from the AGN core. The authors disfavour this explanation, citing previous radiative transfer simulations that show that the flux should fall off with distance from the core too quickly to be consistent with the observations.

No matter the interpretation, these LBTI observations are an important glimpse into the future of mid-infrared AGN studies that will be done with 30-metre-class telescopes (such as the European Southern Observatory’s Extremely Large Telescope). This article, together with the group’s similar study on NGC 1068, is challenging and refining an accepted view of AGN morphology — the consequences of which apply to galaxies near and far — and poses new questions perfect for sophisticated hydrodynamic and radiative simulations.

Original astrobite edited by Margaret Verrico.

About the author, Ryan White:

I am a first-year PhD student at Macquarie University in Australia, working mainly on binary/multiple systems with massive stars (Wolf–Rayets in particular!). Outside of study, I’m probably drinking coffee, baking, reading, or going for a run. You can also find me procrastinating on Bluesky @astroryan.bsky.social.

The post I Spy with My Large Binocular Eyes: A Dusty Torus Around a Supermassive Black Hole? appeared first on AAS Nova.

Editor’s Note: Astrobites is a graduate-student-run organization that digests astrophysical literature for undergraduate students. As part of the partnership between the AAS and astrobites, we occasionally repost astrobites content here at AAS Nova. We hope you enjoy this post from astrobites; the original can be viewed at astrobites.org.

Title: A Deep Search for Exomoons Around WISE 0855 with JWST
Authors: Mikayla J. Wilson et al.
First Author’s Institution: University of California, Santa Cruz
Status: Published in AJ

The “Moon”-umental Question

The solar system hosts hundreds of moons, ranging from volcanic worlds like Io around Jupiter, to icy objects like Enceladus around Saturn, to captured objects like Neptune’s retrograde moon Triton. Moons are essential to our model of how the solar system formed and also offer some of the best chances we have for finding life beyond Earth.

Astronomers also expect exomoons, or moons orbiting planets outside the solar system, to be abundant around other giant exoplanets. But how common are exomoons? How do they compare to the moons in our solar system?

In order to begin answering those questions, we must first detect an exomoon, which has proved difficult despite decades of searching by astronomers. Fortunately, JWST presents a new opportunity to uncover the exomoon population by looking at lonely free-floating planets as they drift through space.

Why Free-Floating Planets?

One proposed method for searching for exomoons is by looking for their transits in front of their host planets, characterized by the dips in brightness of the planet as the moon passes in front, blocking the planet’s light. Looking for exomoon transits around planets orbiting stars is quite difficult, as the bright starlight can easily drown out the small signals of exomoon transits. Free-floating planets solve this issue by removing the star entirely, increasing our sensitivity to such detections. (See this bite for a good review.)

The authors of today’s article directed the exomoon hunt towards the free-floating WISE J085510.83-071442.5 (or WISE 0855). It has the prestige of being the coldest known brown dwarf (250–285K) while also sitting at a relatively low mass (3–10 Jupiter masses). Notably, it is also one of our closest neighbors at a distance of only 7.4 light-years, making it ideal for high-precision observations despite its faintness. Even though brown dwarfs are technically distinct from planets, the authors opt to refer to companions around WISE 0855 as moons given WISE 0855’s “planetary-mass” status. (It’s complicated…)

Repurposing JWST Data… for Moons!

The JWST observations used in this study contain 11 hours of near-infrared (2.87–5.27 microns) time-series spectra originally intended to study water clouds and weather on WISE 0855. Time-series brightness monitoring can also be used for transit searches, which the authors take advantage of.

One complication is that WISE 0855 is variable, meaning its intrinsic brightness changes over time. Variability is likely driven by clouds and other dynamic processes within its atmosphere. So how do the authors distinguish between a passing moon and a turbulent atmosphere? The key idea is that variability is wavelength dependent, meaning that the brightness of WISE 0855 will fluctuate differently depending on the observed wavelength. In contrast, transits are “gray,” meaning that the same amount of light is blocked at all wavelengths, producing a consistent feature across the entire spectrum.

Finding Moons with Statistics!

The authors apply this idea and pick out two wavelength regions of WISE 0855’s spectrum that contain two distinct variability patterns, which should both contain an identical moon transit signal (if present). They then generate a light curve (how brightness changes over time) for these two regions (see Fig. 1).

To appropriately model the variability, the authors employ Gaussian processes, a flexible tool that can model complex, quasi-periodic signals like atmospheric variability. They compare fits from two types of models:

• Gaussian processes–only model: Assumes that all observed variability is intrinsic to the planet itself
• Gaussian processes + transit model: Includes a simple trapezoidal exomoon transit signal that is simultaneously fit in both light curves

Using Bayesian evidence (a measure of how well each model explains the data), they determined which model was favored. So, what do they find?

The Bad News and the Good News

Based on Bayesian evidence, the authors conclude that there are no statistically significant detections of exomoons in the data. The results suggest very weak evidence for a ~0.53-Earth-radius moon at a wide separation from WISE 0855 — an unlikely scenario given that transit probability decreases at greater separations (and therefore longer orbital periods).

Yet, the study goes further: What kinds of moons is JWST able to detect, if any? To answer this, the authors performed injection and recovery tests, where they injected artificial transit signals of varying depths (exomoon sizes) into the data and tested how well their models were able to recover them (results shown in Fig. 2). They find that JWST is capable of detecting 96% of transits with depths ≥0.5%, equivalent to a Titan-like moon. Smaller Io-like moons were also detectable more than half of the time. This means that if a Titan analog had actually transited during these observations, we would almost certainly have seen it!

JWST will continue to gather more time-series data of free-floating planets, brown dwarfs, and directly imaged exoplanets, each providing a new opportunity to help us better understand the moon population outside of our solar system. We’re still waiting for the first confirmed exomoon, but when that transit finally happens, we know that JWST will be ready.

Original astrobite edited by Kelsie Taylor.

About the author, Jared Bull:

I am a 2nd-year PhD student at Johns Hopkins University. I study brown dwarf variability and am interested in using time-series observations to uncover dynamic processes within their atmospheres. In my free time I like to read, cook, and do astrophotography.

The post Hunting for Exomoons Around a Lonely Planet appeared first on AAS Nova.

Editor’s Note: Astrobites is a graduate-student-run organization that digests astrophysical literature for undergraduate students. As part of the partnership between the AAS and astrobites, we occasionally repost astrobites content here at AAS Nova. We hope you enjoy this post from astrobites; the original can be viewed at astrobites.org.

Title: Metal-Poor Star-Forming Clumps in Cosmic Noon Galaxies: Evidence for Gas Inflow and Chemical Dilution Using JWST NIRISS
Authors: Vicente Estrada-Carpenter et al.
First Author’s Institution: Arizona State University
Status: Published in ApJ

If you want to reconstruct a galaxy’s life story, one of the best “fossil records” is its metallicity. In astronomy this refers to the abundance of elements heavier than helium, which are made in stars and returned to a galaxy’s gas through winds and supernovae. Over time, more star formation usually means more metals mixed into the gas.

Now zoom to Cosmic Noon (roughly when the universe was most actively forming stars). Many galaxies in this epoch look “clumpy”; their star formation is concentrated in several bright knots scattered across the disk. The big question is where those clumps come from. Do they form from the galaxy’s own gas via internal disk instabilities, or do they light up when fresh, metal-poor gas flows in and both fuels star formation and dilutes the local metallicity?

The authors try to answer that question with JWST by measuring the metallicity of each clump relative to its immediate surroundings, rather than comparing clumps to a single galaxy-wide number (which can be misleading if the galaxy has a metallicity gradient).

They use JWST/Near Infrared Imager and Slitless Spectrograph (NIRISS) slitless grism spectroscopy from the CAnadian NIRISS Unbiased Cluster Survey (CANUCS) to study 20 lensed galaxies at redshift 0.6 < z < 1.35. (Lensing effectively acts like a zoom lens, helping to resolve smaller structures.) They focus on emission lines that trace star-forming gas, especially Hα (a star formation tracer) and sulfur lines [SII] and [SIII] (needed for their metallicity method).

Slitless spectra come with a headache: because there is no slit, different parts of a galaxy can overlap in the dispersed image. To make reliable emission-line maps from slitless data, the authors use a forward-modeling code called Sleuth, which allows the continuum to vary across the galaxy.

The authors identify clumps using the Hα map together with rest-frame ultraviolet imaging because these tracers are sensitive to star formation on different timescales: Hα highlights gas ionized by the youngest massive stars, while ultraviolet light traces young stellar light over longer periods. As a result a clump can be bright in one and not the other, especially if dust is involved.

To estimate gas-phase metallicity, they use the “strong-line” method, which infers metallicity from ratios of bright emission lines calibrated using models and empirical samples. Their main diagnostic is S23 = ([SIII] + [SII]) / Hα. Because some line ratios also depend on the ionization state (how strongly the gas is being ionized by young stars), they also use the sulfur ratio S32 = [SIII]/[SII] as a check and iterate to a self-consistent solution.

So, Are Clumps Really Chemically Different from Their Surroundings?

For each clump, the authors measure the metallicity inside the clump and compare it to an annulus just outside the clump (masking neighboring clumps to avoid mixing). When they plot “clump metallicity” versus “local disk metallicity,” most points fall below the 1-to-1 line, meaning the clumps are more metal poor than their surroundings (Figure 1). The mean offset is about 0.1 dex, which corresponds to roughly 20% dilution in the clump gas.

An extra wrinkle is that the galaxy medians hint at two populations: some galaxies have clumps with small offsets (near the 1-to-1 line), while others show larger offsets. The authors suggest this could mean two formation pathways, one dominated by internal gas reservoirs (smaller offsets) and another where inflow of metal-poor gas plays a bigger role (larger offsets). They are careful, though, as the sample is still small.

If inflow is really the driver, you should expect a link: the more strongly a clump is forming stars relative to its surroundings, the more diluted its metallicity should be. That is exactly what the authors find. The clumps that are most boosted in star formation are also the most metal diluted.

The article also emphasizes that clumps are not chemically uniform blobs. In at least one detailed example, the peaks in Hα (highest star formation) coincide with local minima in metallicity along a cut through the galaxy (Figure 2), suggesting internal star formation rate and metallicity gradients that reinforce the same story, intense star formation goes hand in hand with lower metallicity in the clump regions.

Are These Clumps Really “In Situ,” or Could They Be Small Satellites?

A reasonable alternative is that some clumps are actually small companion galaxies projected onto the disk. These could also look metal poor, because low-mass galaxies tend to be low metallicity. The authors look for evidence using face-on systems and find that more massive clumps tend to sit closer to galaxy centers, which is consistent with in-situ clumps that form in the disk and migrate inward, though it does not rule out satellites. They argue that kinematics from JWST/NIRSpec IFU will be needed for a definitive separation.

Why This Matters

Gas inflow, star formation, and feedback, together known as the baryon cycle, are key drivers of how galaxies grow. What this article adds is a spatially resolved view that compares each clump to its local environment, showing that regions of elevated star formation also tend to be locally metal poor. That pairing is hard to explain as a simple metallicity gradient or a galaxy-wide averaging effect, and it is exactly what you would expect if at least some clumps are being fueled by relatively metal-poor inflows. In short, these clumps may be snapshots of galaxies refueling in real time.

Original astrobite edited by Ryan White.

About the author, Niloofar Sharei:

I’m an astronomy PhD candidate at UC Riverside studying how galaxies grow through star-forming clumps. I track how these clumps emerge, evolve, and sometimes survive long enough to reshape their galaxies. When I’m not thinking about cosmic blobs, I’m reading, hiking, or listening to Bach.

The post Feed the Fire, Fade the Metals appeared first on AAS Nova.

Editor’s Note: Astrobites is a graduate-student-run organization that digests astrophysical literature for undergraduate students. As part of the partnership between the AAS and astrobites, we occasionally repost astrobites content here at AAS Nova. We hope you enjoy this post from astrobites; the original can be viewed at astrobites.org.

Title: Hunting for the First Explosions at the High-Redshift Frontier
Authors: Junehyoung Jeon et al.
First Author’s Institution: The University of Texas at Austin
Status: Published in ApJ

Back in the 1920s, astronomers discovered that we live within just one of many, many galaxies in the big, wide universe. Since then, we’ve been racing to search for the most distant galaxy that can be observed — in other words, searching for the oldest starlight we can see, since the light from these distant sources has been travelling towards us for most of the age of the universe. (Remember: more distant = higher redshift = longer lookback time.)

This race to the redshift frontier has had a pretty eventful history (see a great overview video here), which became even more eventful with the launch of JWST. JWST rapidly smashed the previous redshift (z) record of z = 10.6 by discovering a galaxy at z = 13.2, and then it broke its own record twice more. The current title holder sits at z = 14.4, observed less than 300 million years after the Big Bang.

Several galaxy candidates (to date unconfirmed) have now even been proposed at z ~ 25–32 (e.g., Capotauro), only 100 million years after the Big Bang! If real, these sources would pose a serious challenge to our understanding of the formation of the first galaxies, as galaxies shouldn’t really be observable at such early times. In today’s article, the authors put forward an intriguing alternative: what if some of these ultra-high-redshift candidates aren’t galaxies at all, but transient explosions from the universe’s first stars?

The First Stars and Their Explosive Endings

The earliest generation of stars (Population III; see my previous bite on these here) formed from pristine hydrogen and helium gas. Without metals to cool the gas efficiently, theory predicts that these stars were extremely massive, often exceeding 100 solar masses. While such stars would be short-lived, their deaths could be spectacular.

Population III stars of sufficient mass are predicted to end their lives as hyper-energetic pair-instability supernovae (PISNe). This is a long-winded name for a rapid, intensely hot explosion that leaves no remnant behind — not even a trace of the pre-existing star. Whilst nothing would remain of the star, the light emitted in that explosion could be bright enough to masquerade as a high-redshift galaxy candidate in current JWST surveys, but only if three key conditions are met:

1. JWST must observe a sufficiently overdense region, where lots of Population III stars can form very early.
2. A PISN must occur while JWST is “watching.”
3. The explosion must be bright enough to rise above JWST’s detection limits.

Simulating a (Biased) Universe

To address the likelihood of these conditions having already been met by existing JWST observations, the authors turn to cosmological simulations. Rather than simulating an “average” patch of the universe, they focus on an extremely overdense region (Fig. 1). This creates a rare but important environment where structures collapse earlier than usual. These regions are exactly where large numbers of Population III stars are expected to form at the highest redshifts.

In their simulations, star formation begins as early as z ~ 30–40 (within the first hundred million years after the Big Bang), producing Population III stars and, by extension, potential PISNe very shortly afterwards. While such overdense regions are rare, the authors show that the total area already surveyed by JWST (including large surveys such as CEERS, JADES, PRIMER, and COSMOS-Web) is large enough that it is plausible JWST has already observed at least one such region.

Catching a Cosmic Explosion in the Act

So, we can tick off condition #1: it’s possible that a sufficiently overdense region has already been observed by JWST. Next up, how lucky do we have to be to catch an explosion in the act (condition #2), so to speak? For this condition, cosmic time dilation actually works in our favour. A PISN explosion at z > 20 that lasts only months in its own rest frame can last for decades in the observed frame. (This whole time-being-relative thing sounds wacky because it is — please join me, Neil deGrasse Tyson, and countless others in struggling to imagine this.)

But would any such explosion be bright enough (condition #3)? Using theoretical PISN spectra, the authors show that these explosions could reach observed magnitudes of ~28–29 at z ~ 30 — right at the depth of current JWST deep surveys (Fig. 2). In fact, the predicted brightness and colours are somewhat comparable to those of some proposed z ~ 30 candidates (Fig. 3), raising the possibility that these objects could be PISNe rather than galaxies.

So… Are We Seeing the First Stars Die?

It’s not time to throw a party just yet. The authors note there are several caveats and uncertainties. The nature of Population III stars is still highly uncertain, JWST does not continuously monitor the same patch of sky, and identifying a PISN at such high redshift would be extremely challenging. Thanks to time dilation, these explosions would fade very slowly, making them hard to distinguish from steady sources using photometry alone. Alternatively, there are other plausible explanations for these ultra-high-redshift candidates: lower-redshift interlopers (a rather infamous example is CEERS-93316), local brown dwarfs, or even nearby exoplanets.

Still, the idea is exciting. If JWST were to detect a genuine PISN at z > 20, it would represent a direct glimpse of the very first stars, pushing observational astronomy into truly uncharted territory. For now, the most distant explosions in the universe may already be hiding in JWST images; we just have to learn how to recognise them.

Original astrobite edited by Nathalie Korhonen Cuestas.

About the author, Lucie Rowland:

I’m a fourth (and final!) year PhD student at Leiden Observatory in the Netherlands, studying massive, star forming galaxies in the early universe with ALMA and JWST. It’s a really exciting time to be interested in astronomy, so I hope to make groundbreaking new research more accessible!

The post The Oldest Starlight appeared first on AAS Nova.

Editor’s Note: Astrobites is a graduate-student-run organization that digests astrophysical literature for undergraduate students. As part of the partnership between the AAS and astrobites, we occasionally repost astrobites content here at AAS Nova. We hope you enjoy this post from astrobites; the original can be viewed at astrobites.org.

Title: GLIMPSE: An Ultrafaint ≃10⁵ M_⊙ Pop III Galaxy Candidate and First Constraints on the Pop III UV Luminosity Function at z ≃ 6–7
Authors: Seiji Fujimoto et al.
First Author’s Institution: University of Toronto; The University of Texas at Austin
Status: Published in ApJ

You, me, your laptop, my $8 matcha, and just about everything else on Earth was forged in the fiery bellies of dying stars. Generations of stars had to live and die before the universe became enriched with any elements heavier than helium (what astronomers call “metals”). The first stars to undergo this cosmic cycle are known as Population III (Pop III) stars. Though their existence has been hypothesized since the 1960s, astronomers have failed to observe these distant metal-free stars or the faint, low-mass galaxies that host them.

The first Pop III stars likely formed around 100 million years after the Big Bang in pristine pockets of hydrogen gas. Although these are too distant for us to observe, we expect that as the universe started to become metal enriched, there were still existing pockets of gas introverted enough to survive unpolluted and form metal-free Pop III stars up to a redshift of z ~ 6–7 (when the universe was around 900 million years old)!

JWST is the perfect instrument to search for these systems. You can read other astrobites on the search for possible Pop III systems with JWST here and here. The authors of today’s article seek to develop the most efficient way of using JWST’s Near-Infrared Camera (NIRCam) to find the galaxies hosting Pop III stars. Using their selection method on existing NIRCam data, the authors identified one promising Pop III galaxy candidate.

I’m Not Like Other Galaxies

In order to find a Pop III galaxy, we need to take a look at galaxies’ spectral energy distributions (SEDs). These are graphs that show the energy emitted by a galaxy at different wavelengths of light. Pop III galaxies are expected to have SEDs that differ from your everyday, metal-enriched galaxy. NIRCam will be especially sensitive to three key spectral features that show up in the SEDs of Pop III galaxies: an absent [O III] line (light emitted by doubly ionized oxygen atoms), a strong H-alpha line (light emitted when a hydrogen atom transitions from its third to its second energy level), and a significant Balmer jump (light absorbed to ionize electrons in the second energy level of a hydrogen atom). To identify these key SED characteristics, the authors use SED fitting and color–color diagrams to execute an efficient Pop III search with NIRCam.

The first selection method involves SED fitting. Astronomers create template SEDs that represent different types of galaxies and then compare these templates to the observed SEDs to see which one matches best. In this work, the authors use metal-rich galaxy templates and Pop III templates to fit the galaxies observed with NIRCam. They then calculate the chi-squared χ² (a statistical measure of best fit) between the data and all the SED templates. A galaxy is selected as a Pop III candidate if the Pop III model provides a good fit (χ² < 10) to the photometry and is significantly better than any metal-rich model. It’s kind of like looking for Cinderella by making every woman in the kingdom try on the glass slipper.

A color–color diagram plots the difference in magnitude between two filters on each axis. NIRCam filters are specially chosen to emphasize the SED characteristics above. When these filters are chosen, Pop III galaxies occupy a distinct region of this diagram as compared to metal-rich galaxies. For example, subtracting the F356W filter from the F277W filter is sensitive to the presence of the [O III] line and the Balmer jump. Figure 1 demonstrates how this color selection separates Pop III galaxies from typical galaxies.

O Pop III, Pop III, Wherefore Art Thou?

The authors apply their fresh new selection criteria to publicly available NIRCam data from large surveys. And (drum roll please) the slipper fits! The Pop III galaxy candidate GLIMPSE-16043 is an ultra-faint galaxy at z = 6.5. It was imaged in the GLIMPSE survey, which uses the technique of gravitational lensing to observe faint and distant galaxies.

The GLIMPSE survey targeted a massive galaxy cluster, Abell S1063. The cluster bends the light from distant galaxies and, like a giant lens, magnifies faraway objects, providing some of the deepest JWST imaging to date. The Pop III candidate passes both tests: it resides in the Pop III region of the color–color diagram, and its SED is best fit by a Pop III model, not a metal-rich galaxy model (see Figure 2). Next, spectroscopic follow-up is needed to ensure that this galaxy is truly metal free and not just extremely metal poor.

The authors conclude that our best shot at identifying additional Pop III galaxy candidates is using NIRCam to image large numbers of gravitationally lensed clusters. Without magnification from gravitational lensing, it may be impossible to see these ultra-faint Pop III galaxies. Once candidates have been identified, they can be followed up with deep spectroscopy to confirm their redshift and their lack of metals. Who knows? With these new methods, we may soon get a glimpse of the universe’s very first stars.

Original astrobite edited by Chris Layden and Margaret Verrico.

About the author, Madison VanWyngarden:

I am a first-year PhD student in astronomy and NSF Graduate Research Fellow at the University of Arizona. I study galaxy formation and evolution in the distant universe and am particularly interested in dusty star-forming galaxies. In my free time, I love reading, hiking, and baking bread!

The post A Possible GLIMPSE of the Universe’s First Stars appeared first on AAS Nova.

Editor’s Note: Astrobites is a graduate-student-run organization that digests astrophysical literature for undergraduate students. As part of the partnership between the AAS and astrobites, we occasionally repost astrobites content here at AAS Nova. We hope you enjoy this post from astrobites; the original can be viewed at astrobites.org.

Title: Searching Within Galaxies for the Earliest Signs of Quenching With Spatially Resolved Star Formation Histories in UVCANDELS
Authors: Charlotte Olsen et al.
First Author’s Institution: New York City College of Technology
Status: Published in ApJ

How and Why Do Galaxies Stop Forming Stars?

Galaxies serve as important laboratories for many subfields of astrophysics. As such, astrophysicists are interested in the full galactic life cycle, from how galaxies are born to the end of their formation. Whereas young galaxies in the distant universe are actively forming stars, many nearby galaxies are much quieter, with little or no ongoing star formation. Astronomers like to describe these galaxies as “red and dead” because their stars are older and therefore appear redder in color. The process by which galaxies shut down their star formation is known as quenching, and it causes galaxies to become quiescent. Understanding the origin of quiescent galaxies is a fundamental question in galaxy evolution. Studying this process is challenging, however, because star formation is intertwined with many other factors that shape galaxies, including their environments and supermassive black holes.

Star formation occurs on scales that are much smaller and over timescales much shorter than the global properties and overall lifetime of a galaxy. By observing star formation on these smaller scales over time, astronomers can gain a clearer picture of how star formation ceases in a galaxy, and they can determine whether this process is driven from the inside out — starting with the supermassive black hole in the galactic center — or from the outside in, influenced by environmental effects. In today’s article, the authors use the Cosmic Assembly Near-Infrared Deep Extragalactic Legacy Survey with high-resolution ultraviolet coverage (UVCANDELS) to examine eight “golden” galaxies, shown in Figure 1. They then reconstruct the star formation histories within small regions of each galaxy to detect the “earliest signs of quenching.”

Characterizing the Star Formation Histories

To trace a galaxy’s star formation over cosmic time, today’s authors model its integrated light — which encodes the many episodes of past star formation — using spectral energy distribution (SED) fitting. By comparing a galaxy’s light across many wavelengths to computer models, SED fitting can estimate the ages of its stars and when they formed. This approach allows astronomers to study how a galaxy’s star formation rate evolves as a function of its stellar mass, known as the SFR – M_stellar relation. Note that the article considers the star formation rate and stellar mass in individual regions of each galaxy, so it analyzes these properties as surface densities, Σ_SFR and Σ_Mstellar, instead of the total values.

Using SED fitting, the authors determine the expected star formation rate and stellar mass of the regions from 250 million to 1 billion years before the time of observation. Figure 2 shows the line of best fit for the SFR – M_stellar relation of the regions for each galaxy, before and at the time of observation. The SFR – M_stellar relations are very similar across the sample 1 billion years before the observations; however, by the time of observation, the overall star formation rates have decreased slightly, indicating that the galaxies are beginning to quench. They also exhibit increased variation suggesting that each galaxy is quenching in a different way.

To further probe how these galaxies are starting to quench, the authors also measure the specific star formation rate (sSFR) of the regions as a function of their distance from the center of the galaxy. The sSFR can be thought of as the rate of new star formation relative to the amount of existing stellar mass: SFR /M_stellar. Figure 3 shows three examples from the galaxies studied in this work. Once again, the star formation rates of the regions decrease over the course of 1 billion years. However, the regions where the star formation rate has declined most rapidly differ from galaxy to galaxy — ranging from the central regions to the mid-disk to the outskirts — as each galaxy is undergoing a different quenching mechanism.

Detecting the Earliest Signs of Quenching

It should be noted that all of the galaxies in this study are still forming stars. However, they are on the verge of having their star formation suppressed, offering valuable insight into how quenching begins and how diverse the process can be. New telescopes are pushing the boundaries of what we can observe. On one hand, JWST can capture galaxies at exceptionally high resolution; on the other, the Vera C. Rubin Observatory and the Nancy Grace Roman Space Telescope will deliver vast datasets containing billions of galaxies. Future investigations leveraging these facilities could reveal more about the physical processes that quench galaxies on small scales, shedding light on the mechanisms that drive galaxy evolution.

Original astrobite edited by Catherine Slaughter.

About the author, Shalini Kurinchi-Vendhan:

After studying astrophysics and literature at Caltech, I moved onto a Fulbright Fellowship in Heidelberg, Germany. I’m passionate about using computer simulations to explore supermassive black holes and galaxy evolution — but I also love poetry and traveling.

The post Observing the End of Star Formation in Galaxies appeared first on AAS Nova.

Editor’s Note: Astrobites is a graduate-student-run organization that digests astrophysical literature for undergraduate students. As part of the partnership between the AAS and astrobites, we occasionally repost astrobites content here at AAS Nova. We hope you enjoy this post from astrobites; the original can be viewed at astrobites.org.

Title: The X-Ray Dot: Exotic Dust or a Late-Stage Little Red Dot?
Authors: Raphael E. Hviding et al.
First Author’s Institution: Max Planck Institute for Astronomy
Status: Published in ApJL

What Are Little Red Dots?

One of the most intriguing results produced by JWST was the serendipitous discovery of a new class of object: “little red dots” (LRDs). These objects started popping up everywhere in our early universe observations. Surprisingly, they look like compact (little) red dots in imaging data (astronomers are an incredibly creative bunch). The number of LRDs we observe drops drastically at redshifts less than about z = 4 (about 12 billion years ago), implying that LRDs are likely evolving into something else entirely. The luminous, compact nature of LRDs, paired with their disappearance from the cosmic stage, has continuously puzzled astronomers in recent years.

At least part of the LRD population has routinely been explained as a new class of active galactic nuclei (AGN). AGN are the central engines of many galaxies — luminous regions powered by actively accreting supermassive black holes. Recent evidence has increasingly pointed towards LRDs being a new class of AGN: black hole stars, or black holes surrounded by dense cocoons of gas. Naturally, this raises questions surrounding the placement of LRDs in our understanding of supermassive black hole and galaxy evolution across cosmic time.

A hallmark of typical AGNs is their X-ray brightness. X-rays are one of the most energetic types of electromagnetic radiation, and they are primarily produced by the most extreme astrophysical situations (think neutron star mergers). One of the key challenges in explaining the nature of LRDs has been their lack of X-ray emission. Their lack of emission in this regime is a piece of evidence pointing towards a black hole star scenario — dense gas can block the X-rays being produced by the black hole. However, the lack of LRDs in the present-day universe implies that they likely shed their cocoons at some point. Catching an LRD in the act of shedding its cocoon would thus provide an important piece of evidence surrounding their nature and evolution. Thankfully, today’s authors may have done exactly that! They report the discovery of what they call the “X-ray dot” (XRD): an LRD-like object that is also X-ray luminous at a redshift of approximately z = 3.28.

New JWST Observations of the XRD

While archival observations of the XRD with the Hubble Space Telescope, the Canada France Hawaii Telescope, the Spitzer Space Telescope, and the Chandra X-ray Observatory existed, new spectral data from JWST were needed to study the system in depth. Spectral data have a huge advantage over photometric observations when it comes to modeling the system. With a good quality spectrum, astronomers can use sophisticated modeling tools to try and pin down the physical nature of the emission we’re observing, and thus understand its intrinsic nature.

Figure 1 showcases the archival data from Hubble, Spitzer, and Chandra, along with the XRD’s spectrum from JWST (black curve, bottom panel). Photometric observations of the source indicate that it is incredibly compact (radius ≲ 250 pc, about 100 times more compact than the Milky Way) and shows similarities to LRD spectra, but with some key differences. (An example LRD spectrum is shown as the red curve in Figure 1.) The impressive X-ray luminosity of the XRD — typical of standard AGNs — is another key difference between it and standard LRDs.

So…What’s the Deal with the XRD?

To understand the nature of the XRD, the authors fit a variety of models describing a wide range of physical systems to the available data. Surprisingly, their best-fit models indicate that if the XRD is simply a typical AGN heavily obscured by astrophysical dust, its dust properties are drastically different from those of typical galaxies and AGN. Instead, trying to explain the system as an AGN embedded in a cocoon of gas (the black hole star model) provides better results (more aligned with observed LRDs), but it still isn’t perfect.

Notably, the emission in the ultraviolet-to-optical regime of the electromagnetic spectrum differs greatly from that of LRDs. In LRDs, this emission is indicative of a single dense gas component around the supermassive black hole, while in the XRD the authors find evidence suggestive of a patchier, less uniform distribution of gas. However, in order for this explanation to match the data, physical conditions of the model must be finely tuned, suggesting that this model may need to be refined further. These factors seem to suggest that the XRD is poorly understood in the context of our current paradigm of models describing AGNs and LRDs. The potentially patchy nature of the XRD’s gas envelope could suggest that this object is an LRD in the process of shedding its outer envelope, evolving into a typical AGN.

Regardless of its true nature, the XRD opens up new doors in our understanding of AGNs and LRDs. It provides an exciting glimpse at AGN evolution in action — a transitional fossil for early universe black holes. With a new piece of the puzzle slotted into our picture of AGN evolution, it’s only a matter of time before astronomers fully contextualize the stubbornly enigmatic LRDs.

Original astrobite edited by Ansh R. Gupta.

About the author, Drew Lapeer:

Drew is a first-year PhD student at the University of Massachusetts Amherst. They are broadly interested in the evolution of galaxies, with a focus on the impact of cosmic feedback on the galactic ecosystem. In their free time, they enjoy reading, rock climbing, hiking, and baking!

The post A Potential New Piece of the “Little Red Dot” Puzzle appeared first on AAS Nova.

Editor’s Note: Astrobites is a graduate-student-run organization that digests astrophysical literature for undergraduate students. As part of the partnership between the AAS and astrobites, we occasionally repost astrobites content here at AAS Nova. We hope you enjoy this post from astrobites; the original can be viewed at astrobites.org.

Title: Protostars at Subsolar Metallicity: First Detection of Large Solid-State Complex Organic Molecules in the Large Magellanic Cloud
Authors: Marta Sewiło et al.
First Author’s Institution: NASA Goddard Space Flight Center
Status: Published in ApJL

Stars and planets form when clouds of molecules collapse in on themselves due to the overwhelming force of gravity (which, relatable). This process is quite mysterious, as these clouds will only live for a couple million years before collapsing, and the newly forming protostars only live for about half a million years before becoming main-sequence stars.

But we are able to find some protostars in the Milky Way and in the Small and Large Magellanic Clouds near us, and observing the molecules around these protostars can help us understand how protostars form.

To look for molecules around protostars, astronomers take spectra of the protostars in the infrared, which is a wavelength region where molecules emit a lot of light. As better instruments are being built, astronomers are more often able to look for what are called complex organic molecules, which are carbon-bearing molecules with at least six atoms.

These complex organic molecules can be detected in different states: most detections have been of gaseous molecules in and around protostars or planet-forming disks, but they can also be found in a solid state on the surfaces of dust grains in the interstellar medium in a galaxy. In this state, they are called complex organic molecule “ices.” These “ices” were rarely found pre-JWST, but since its launch, detections have been more numerous, mainly in the Milky Way. Observing these complex molecules on the surfaces of dust grains tells us more about protostellar dust chemistry, which is an important but still mysterious aspect of star formation.

In this study, researchers look outside of our own galaxy to explore the complex organic molecules in the Large Magellanic Cloud (LMC). The LMC is an interesting place to look for these molecules because it has lower metal content (i.e., elements heavier than hydrogen and helium) than the Milky Way, as well as a harder radiation field. This means photons flying around in the LMC generally have higher energies than photons flying around in the Milky Way, and elements like carbon, oxygen, and nitrogen are less abundant. This is important because these conditions are more similar to what typical galaxies were like in the early universe. Thus the LMC is a better test bed to look at protostars than the Milky Way if we want to understand how stars formed in the early universe.

The authors of this study have found signatures of complex organic molecules in protostars forming in the LMC. They focus on the protostar ST6 in the LMC, shown in the right image in Figure 1. They used JWST’s Mid-Infrared Instrument to take spectra of the region around ST6.

Spectroscopic Signatures of Molecules on Dust Grains

The researchers used the Python tool called dEcompositioN of Infrared Ice features using Genetic Modelling Algorithms (ENIIGMA) to fit the spectroscopy. This code compares the spectra to laboratory data of these complex organic molecules at the temperatures we see in the LMC. The authors fit for complex organic molecules they might expect to see, and they detect methanol (CH₃OH), acetaldehyde (CH₃CHO), ethanol (CH₃CH₂OH), methyl formate (HCOOCH₃), and acetic acid (CH₃COOH); of these, acetaldehyde, ethanol, and methyl formate have never before been detected outside of the Milky Way. Interestingly, this is the first time acetic acid has been definitively detected in any astrophysical environment. The spectral contribution from each molecule is shown in Figure 2; all the individual contributions added together make up the observed spectrum.

These detections provide evidence that these complex organic molecules can be produced on the surfaces of dust grains. Further, their detection in the LMC provides evidence that these molecules can be produced in “harsh” environments like the LMC, with lower metal content and harder radiation fields.

When the authors compared the abundances of these ices to other protostars in the Milky Way galaxy, they found that the abundances are slightly lower around the LMC protostar. This may happen because the dust temperatures are generally higher in the LMC due to the higher-energy photons, which affect the chemistry happening on the dust. Some species they found, however, do have similar abundances to the Milky Way protostars, indicating that the harder radiation field of the LMC does not affect how these species form. Finding more complex organic molecules in the Magellanic Clouds will help us understand further how these compounds form on dust grains and how the galactic environment may affect their formation.

Original astrobite edited by Shalini Kurinchi-Vendhan.

About the author, Caroline von Raesfeld:

I’m a third-year PhD student at Northwestern University. My research explores how we can better understand high-redshift galaxy spectra using observations and modeling. In my free time, I love to read, write, and learn about history.

The post Detecting New Icy Molecules Around a Newly Forming Star with JWST appeared first on AAS Nova.

Editor’s Note: Astrobites is a graduate-student-run organization that digests astrophysical literature for undergraduate students. As part of the partnership between the AAS and astrobites, we occasionally repost astrobites content here at AAS Nova. We hope you enjoy this post from astrobites; the original can be viewed at astrobites.org.

Title: Fast Radio Bursts from White Dwarf Binary Mergers: Isolated and Triple-Induced Channels
Authors: Cheyanne Shariat et al.
First Author’s Institution: California Institute of Technology
Status: Published in ApJL

The History of Fast Radio Bursts

Since the discovery of the Lorimer Burst in 2007, astronomers have studied fast radio bursts (FRBs) in extreme detail. However, these extragalactic millisecond-duration radio transients have remained an enigma. Like many astrophysical phenomena, their discovery was serendipitous. The most prolific FRB-discovery instrument, CHIME, was not originally built to study them; the acronym stands for “Canadian Hydrogen Intensity Mapping Experiment,” reflecting its original (and ongoing) mission to map the cosmological distribution of hydrogen in the primordial universe. Since its construction, CHIME has discovered several thousand FRBs and even identified a smaller fraction that are known to repeat, some with consistent periods and others that are sporadic and seemingly random. (Check out their live catalog of repeating sources.)

Despite having thousands of sources to study, the only thing we know fairly confidently about FRBs is that many of them are extragalactic, and some others are even at cosmological distances. If we don’t understand how FRBs are produced, how can we know their distance? FRBs display a unique signature in their radio spectra, where higher frequencies arrive at the telescope first and lower frequencies arrive later, delayed by an inverse frequency-squared relationship. In a “dynamic spectrum,” this makes the pulse actually appear like a sweep from high to low frequency that follows the shape of a parabola; for example, the brightest pixels in Figure 1 of this Bite display this sweeping shape. This effect results from the FRB propagating through an ionized plasma with a specific density. Since the FRB is ultimately an electromagnetic wave, this slows down the speed of the FRB as a function of frequency. Measuring this effect, called dispersion, allows us to infer that the FRB signal passed through more plasma than can be accounted for within our own Milky Way galaxy, indicating that the FRB must have originated from much farther away. So far, there is only one example of an FRB from within our own galaxy, which was identified as originating from a magnetar, a highly magnetic pulsar.

FRB Progenitor Candidates

Although we know that most FRBs are located at extragalactic or even cosmological distances, it’s still not clear what objects that can generate them. Since magnetars and other compact objects are often considered reliable progenitors of FRBs, understanding their populations and comparing them with observed FRBs may reveal the origin of FRBs. Candidate FRB progenitor systems are usually divided into “prompt” channels — like the collapse of a star into a magnetar during a core-collapse supernova — and “delayed” channels where the FRB engine is formed on longer timescales, like accretion-induced collapse of white dwarfs or compact-object mergers. Figure 1 displays several of these channels, particularly those considered in today’s article, in which stellar evolution results in the transfer of material from one star to another (accretion-induced collapse) or gravitational radiation allows two objects to inspiral and merge. These events could create highly magnetized white dwarfs or magnetars that may produce FRBs.

Simulating Hierarchical Triples

In today’s article, we’re considering the role of hierarchical triple star systems in producing FRB-emitting objects. A hierarchical triple consists of an inner binary and a distant, tertiary star; see the first panel of Figure 1. These systems may play an important role because many stars that become white dwarfs of at least 0.8 solar mass exist in hierarchical triples: 35% of 2-solar-mass stars and 50% of 8-solar-mass stars are in triples. Stars of both masses will end their lives as white dwarfs.

The tertiary star plays an essential role in increasing the likelihood of the inner binary interacting: the eccentric Kozai–Lidov (EKL) mechanism causes the inner orbit to oscillate between highly inclined (with respect to the orbit of the tertiary star) and highly eccentric. Unlike isolated binaries that aren’t excited in this way, the eccentric orbit phase causes the inner stars to pass much closer to each other, increasing the likelihood of interaction or even a merger that could produce an FRB-emitting remnant.

The authors of today’s article produced a realistic population of triple systems by sampling from empirically measured distributions of masses, periods, and orbital eccentricities. These distributions were derived from observations collected by the Gaia satellite, an all-sky optical telescope that has now observed more than one billion stars in the Milky Way. The authors also created a “control” sample of isolated binaries by removing the tertiary star from the same sample of systems. The systems were then evolved for an age randomly selected between 0 and 12.5 billion years to simulate “constant” star formation similar to that in the Milky Way. Finally, they reapply these simulations at three different “metallicities” — the fraction of elements other than hydrogen or helium relative to that of the Sun.

Figure 2 displays these two populations: the isolated binaries are shown as filled histograms, and the hierarchical triples are shown as histograms with dashed lines. Each column represents the three different progenitor classes considered in Figure 1. At solar metallicity, the delays to merging are greater in triples than in secular binaries, leading to more mergers overall (top left panel). At lower metallicities, there are fewer mergers in all progenitor pathways in triples than in isolated binaries due to changes in stellar evolution attributed to weaker winds and larger pre-white dwarf masses.

A Cosmic Population of FRBs

Since we can’t realistically track individual star systems from their formation to the end, we need to convert the delay-time distributions shown in Figure 2 to an observable. To do this, the authors combine the results of their simulations with measurements of the cosmic star formation rate — how many stars form per unit time as a function of the universe’s age — and the evolution of the universe’s metallicity as stars fuse hydrogen into heavier elements and return this material to the interstellar medium as these stars end their lives in shedding red giants or supernovae. This analysis produces the number of FRBs that should be observed as a function of distance or lookback time into the universe’s history, which is displayed in Figure 3.

This analysis reveals key measurable differences between lone binaries and hierarchical triples: most notably, binary white dwarf mergers peak later in the universe (redshift of z ~ 1), while single binaries peak earlier (redshift of z ~ 2). These results highlight the importance of including triples in FRB progenitors because they are more likely to contribute to populations at later times — making them closer and more easily detectable — in the total population of FRBs. Future instruments like CHIME with the new outriggers and the Deep Synoptic Array will expand the sample of FRBs to reach farther cosmological distances, with better localizations, enabling more statistically motivated tests of different formation pathways.

Original astrobite edited by Catherine Slaughter.

About the author, Will Golay:

I am a graduate student in the Department of Astronomy at Harvard University and the Center for Astrophysics | Harvard & Smithsonian, advised by Edo Berger. I study radio emission from transient astrophysical objects like tidal disruption events.

The post Triple Double: Do Merging White Dwarfs Produce Fast Radio Burst–Emitting Remnants? appeared first on AAS Nova.

Editor’s Note: Astrobites is a graduate-student-run organization that digests astrophysical literature for undergraduate students. As part of the partnership between the AAS and astrobites, we occasionally repost astrobites content here at AAS Nova. We hope you enjoy this post from astrobites; the original can be viewed at astrobites.org.

Title: Supernova Ia Remnants with M-Dwarf Surviving Companions
Authors: Kuo-Chuan Pan (潘國全), Pilar Ruiz-Lapuente, and Jonay I. González Hernández
First Author’s Institution: National Tsing Hua University
Status: Published in ApJ

Type Ia supernovae are important tools astronomers use to measure distances in space. Despite their important role as “standardizable candles,” their origins remain hotly debated. It’s long been theorized that a Type Ia supernova can develop from one of two pathways: the single-degenerate channel or the double-degenerate channel. In the single-degenerate channel, a white dwarf and a non-degenerate star (such as a red giant or main-sequence star like our Sun) orbit each other in a close binary system. The white dwarf accretes material from the outer surface of the non-degenerate star until it reaches a critical mass and explodes. The double-degenerate channel begins instead with two white dwarfs orbiting each other. Most explosion mechanisms from this channel result in the complete obliteration of the secondary, less-massive white dwarf. However, one theoretical explosion mechanism, called the dynamically driven double-degenerate double-detonation (D⁶) channel, might allow the secondary companion star to survive an explosion from a double-degenerate Type Ia supernova.

Generally, due to the immense energy from a supernova explosion, we expect these surviving companion stars to be “kicked” away from the blasts at high velocities. Fortunately, astronomers have found evidence of these surviving companion stars. As covered in a previous Astrobite, three hypervelocity white dwarfs have been found in Gaia data and traced back to the locations of double-degenerate Type Ia supernovae. Given the prevalence of Type Ia supernovae, however, astronomers are led to question why we haven’t seen many more of these candidates. It’s additionally important to wonder what similar “runaway” companions might look like for the single-degenerate channel.

Recent observations by the Gaia spacecraft near the supernova remnant G272.2-3.2 show an M-dwarf star, MV-G272, with an unusually high velocity around 240 km/s and a trajectory tracing back to the center of the supernova remnant. Is it possible for this M dwarf to be the runaway companion to the remnant’s original supernova? The authors of today’s article look at simulations of potential companion stars from single-degenerate Type Ia supernovae and compare their results to this observed potential companion candidate.

Because this work focuses on the potential for M-dwarf companions, the authors explored a range of simulated companion-star masses and radii characteristic of M dwarfs: 0.5, 0.6, and 0.7 solar mass and 0.396, 0.454, and 0.483 solar radius, respectively. To make these models, they used the stellar evolution code Modules for Experiments in Stellar Astrophysics (MESA) to construct and evolve a number of simulated stars with these specifications.

After setting up the models in MESA, they used the magnetohydrodynamics code FLASH to perform 2D and 3D simulations of the supernova explosion and the subsequent impact of the exploding star’s ejecta (or hot material) on its M-dwarf companion. After the explosion and impact were modeled, the companion star’s evolution was further followed in MESA.

Figure 1 shows the density of the supernova’s ejecta, or exploding material, as it impacts the companion star. (You can think of this figure as if you were looking at the companion star out in space.) After roughly 100 seconds, you can see a bow shock develop around the top of the companion (or the “front” of the star) as it wraps around the companion. This impact causes significant compression of the companion star and rips away upwards of 50% the companion’s mass. The impact of this shock is what gives the companion star its “kick,” sending it hurtling through space.

Because the authors explored a range of initial companion masses and distances between the primary and companion star, their results show some range. Figure 2 shows two important results: the evolution of the companion’s mass before and after the explosion (left plot), and the evolution of the companion’s kick velocity (right plot). The dip in mass around 100 seconds (10² s) indicates the impact of the bow shock. Even though the simulations model companions with a relatively narrow mass range (0.3–0.7 solar mass), there is considerable variation in the final masses after explosion. For example, the initial 0.5-solar-mass model ends up with anywhere between 0.07 solar mass (just 14% of its initial mass) and almost its full initial mass of 0.5 solar mass, depending on the distance between the companion and its exploding star. The results from this work generally show, predictably, that a companion closer to its primary star gets a bigger kick in velocity. These “kicks” range from about 50 km/s to 150 km/s. When added to the system’s initial velocity in space, it brings the total velocity of these companions into the 150–200 km/s range. This result is generally well aligned with the observed velocity of MV-G272, which was roughly 240 km/s.

Notably, runaway companion stars of these Type Ia supernovae seem to retain information from the initial explosion. Given the final velocities of these companions, astronomers might be able to figure out the companion’s initial mass and trace back its trajectory to the system it originated from. Overall, the fact that MV-G272 has a trajectory that tracks back to the center of a supernova remnant makes it a good companion candidate. These results support the feasibility of M-dwarf runaway companions from single-degenerate Type Ia supernova systems. Now that we know what these companions might look like — and how fast they can be going — astronomers can hopefully better search for these high-velocity stars in the future.

Original astrobite edited by Catherine Slaughter.

About the author, Mckenzie Ferrari:

I’m currently a PhD student in the geophysical sciences program at the University of Chicago. While I now study the atmosphere and oceans of Earth, most of my previous research focused on simulations of Type Ia supernovae and galaxy formation and evolution. In my free time, I foster cats for a local organization, enjoy cooking, and can often be found running along Lake Michigan.

The post I Survived a Type Ia Supernova, and All I Got Was This Kick Velocity appeared first on AAS Nova.

Editor’s Note: Astrobites is a graduate-student-run organization that digests astrophysical literature for undergraduate students. As part of the partnership between the AAS and astrobites, we occasionally repost astrobites content here at AAS Nova. We hope you enjoy this post from astrobites; the original can be viewed at astrobites.org.

Title: The z = 7.08 quasar ULAS J1120+0641 May Never Reach a “Normal” Black Hole to Stellar Mass Ratio
Authors: Meredith A. Stone et al.
First Author’s Institution: University of Arizona
Status: Published in ApJ

The first galaxies in the universe emerged out of an archaic age of darkness. Like luminous factories, they started rapidly churning out stars, spilling light into the cosmos. This process of star formation continues to the present day. In some galaxies, it occurred at astonishing rates, with the equivalent of thousands of times the mass of the Sun being assembled into stars in a single year. At other times, it came to a slow crawl, with all fresh reserves of star-building gas seemingly exhausted. Yet when the gears of star formation ground to a halt, certain events were able to send them spinning again.

One of the most spectacular of these is a merger, a train-wreck collision between two galaxies. Images of these events are often breathtaking, showing arms of light twisting together and vast stellar streams being violently cast away. Mergers directly increase the stellar mass (the mass of all stars) of galaxies by combining two into one. The intense gravitational interactions between the galaxies involved can also disrupt stagnant pools of gas, igniting a new burst of star formation. Thus, interactions between galaxies can be a significant driver of their growth.

Sometimes, a reservoir of matter is driven toward the center of a galaxy due to a “secular” process (one that occurs without external intervention) or from a merger. At the galactic nucleus, the infalling streams of matter encounter a supermassive black hole. The matter falls into a swirling accretion disk, heating to extreme temperatures and furiously glowing. If the black hole is massive enough and the gas falls in quickly enough, the accretion disk can outshine all of the stars in the galaxy, and we call such a source a quasar. The intense radiation produced by a quasar can impact the entire rest of the galaxy, either suppressing the formation of new stars or sometimes igniting it.

Thus, a galaxy has an important role in the growth of its central supermassive black hole, and vice versa. This connection manifests in complicated ways. Most strikingly, it is thought to be the cause of the correlation between a galaxy’s stellar mass and its central black hole mass. In the nearby universe, galaxies have stellar masses around a thousand times greater than their black hole masses. JWST, our most powerful tool for investigating early galaxies, has given us unprecedented insight into whether this holds up in the distant universe. Though the jury is still out, many researchers are convinced that the answer is a resounding no. We’ve found distant black holes that appear to be nearly equal in mass to their host galaxies, something that’s unfathomable in the local universe.

However, this raises a key question. Black holes and their galaxies grow together, and they started on nearly equal footing. So why do all of the galaxies in the nearby universe appear so much more massive than their black holes? Today’s article underscores this puzzle, pushing it to the breaking point. The authors examine a well-studied quasar, ULAS J1120+0641 (hereafter J1120), which we see as it appeared just 750 million years after the Big Bang. This source has a supermassive black hole containing an astounding 20% the mass of its host galaxy. The shocking part is that, even after carefully accounting for all of the ways this galaxy could grow in the future, there appears to be no way for J1120 ever to reach “normal” proportions.

Through the Looking Glass, ULAS J1120

First, the authors analyze the key observations of J1120 obtained to date. In addition to observations from JWST, this source has been targeted by some of the most powerful astronomical facilities, including the Hubble Space Telescope (optical and near-ultraviolet), the Chandra and XMM-Newton observatories (X-rays), the Atacama Large Millimeter/submillimeter Array (radio/millimeter), and numerous other ground-based telescopes. This incredible dataset provides a detailed picture of J1120 across the electromagnetic spectrum, spanning X-rays to radio emission.

The authors compare various measurements of the black hole’s mass and find that multiple methods yield a similar result of about a billion and a half times the mass of the Sun. Turning to the host galaxy, they estimate the mass of the visible stars, which is more complicated than it sounds — you can’t exactly count them, since the enormous distance between us and J1120 causes it to appear as just a fuzzy blob. They combine this mass with the mass of newly forming stars that are buried in dust and obscured from our view. The mass of a nearby galaxy that’s actively merging with J1120 is added to this sum. Finally, the authors compute how many stars could form in the future from all of the gas left in the galaxy, and they throw this into the total.

Even with all of these components, the host galaxy would only be 10 times more massive than the black hole at the center. This ratio is a far cry from the factor of a thousand we expect for normal galaxies in the local universe!

A Train Wreck of Train Wrecks

Well, if one merging galaxy won’t do it, what if J1120 merges with literally every single other nearby galaxy? The authors use new JWST data to count all sources near the quasar (Figure 1) and measure their stellar masses. Going further, they estimate how many galaxies their technique may have missed and add all of these to the pile. Not done yet, they finally conclude by making a rough approximation of how much loose gas is in these nearby galaxies, and compute how much extra mass could exist in stars born from this fresh material. Assuming that J1120 survives the full-frontal assault, being battered by mergers from each of its neighbors in turn, its total stellar mass would grow by quite a large factor.

What’s the final result? Shockingly, even after all of this growth, the stellar mass of J1120 would still only be about 40 times that of the central black hole. That’s 25 times less than we’d expect from a nearby galaxy! Even if the black hole never grows again, it appears that this galaxy will never reach “normal” proportions. So why is it that, when we look around at the local universe, there’s nothing like J1120? The authors point out that galaxies near J1120 would be missed by their methods if they are obscured by thick shrouds of gas and dust. Such sources would increase the estimated mass that could be contributed by mergers. On the other hand, maybe J1120 will adopt the strategy of the blue whale, filter feeding on the extremely sparse matter between galaxies, yet growing to enormous proportions.

A fascinating final possibility is that galaxies like this one do exist in the nearby universe. With their black hole switched off, all we would be able to see is a relatively small package of stars. Place such an object far enough away, and we might miss it entirely! Whether galaxies like J1120 achieved normal proportions through unknown mechanisms or are lurking in the far fringes of the local universe, studies like this one shine light on the amazing connection between black holes and their host galaxies. In the future, they will be one key piece in the puzzle of the endlessly complicated past of our own galaxy and the universe at large.

Original astrobite edited by Will Golay.

About the author, Ansh Gupta:

I’m an astronomy graduate student at the University of Texas at Austin working with Steven Finkelstein. I use data from JWST to study the formation and growth of the first galaxies and black holes in the universe. In my spare time, I enjoy playing piano, reading, and making YouTube videos.

The post Forever Alone: A Black Hole Destined to Stay Too Big appeared first on AAS Nova.

Editor’s Note: Astrobites is a graduate-student-run organization that digests astrophysical literature for undergraduate students. As part of the partnership between the AAS and astrobites, we occasionally repost astrobites content here at AAS Nova. We hope you enjoy this post from astrobites; the original can be viewed at astrobites.org.

Title: Characterizing The Star Cluster Populations in Stephan’s Quintet Using HST and JWST Observations
Authors: P. Aromal et al.
First Author’s Institution: University of Western Ontario
Status: Published in ApJ

On 12 July 2022, the first images taken with JWST were released to the public. All of the astronomers in my department gathered together to watch the images be revealed in real time. It was exciting for everyone, from graduate students getting to see a glimpse into the future possibilities of their fields, to retired professors getting to see the fruits of their decades-long labor in advocating for the telescope to be built.

One image that was showcased was of Stephan’s Quintet (Figure 1), an actively interacting galaxy group. We were all immediately impressed by the clarity of the star-forming regions in the dense gas between the galaxies in the image. Now, more than three years later, the authors of today’s article lay out a comprehensive study of the star clusters in those same regions, taking advantage of JWST’s multi-wavelength imaging capabilities.

HST + JWST = OMG!

While JWST’s depth and resolution are exciting for those studying high-redshift galaxies, for local-universe astronomers JWST really shines when used in combination with the Hubble Space Telescope (HST). The star clusters in Stephan’s Quintet were already cataloged in 2015 using HST, but the filters used in the imaging only captured optical and very-near-infrared wavelengths. If you want to get enough data to be able to accurately estimate the ages of these star clusters, especially accounting for reddening caused by surrounding dust, you need to push your imaging further into the infrared.

Unlike HST, JWST can take images in two wavelength filters at once, meaning you can get more data with roughly the same observing time. Here the authors imaged the same star clusters that HST looked at with five new JWST filters, all at longer infrared wavelengths than HST. Together, the authors had flux measurements at 10 different wavelengths across the optical and infrared spectrum for each star cluster, meaning they could perform spectral energy distribution fitting.

Go Ahead, Guess My Age

The best way to estimate an unresolved star cluster’s age is to get its full spectrum of light and fit spectroscopic models with varying ages to it until the model matches the observations. But, if you have individual brightness measurements at many different, spread-out wavelengths, you can still fit spectral models to the measurements and make a best guess despite the gaps in your full spectrum. Here the authors compare their multi-wavelength data to Code Investigating GALaxy Emission (CIGALE) spectral energy distribution models, allowing both the cluster ages and amount of dust extinction to vary.

This is where the long-wavelength JWST imaging is most necessary, because it is sometimes difficult to determine a cluster’s age with this method. For instance, is the light a cluster is giving off mostly red because its stars are very old, or is it because its stars are actually bluer and younger and the cluster just appears red due to foreground dust?

Infrared imaging can “see through” any dust and break this age–extinction degeneracy. For most of the clusters, the authors found that the original HST-only age estimates were accurate, but for 121 clusters in the sample (about 8% of the total), the JWST imaging made a significant change in the age estimates, shifting them to younger ages.

Where Do the Hip, Young Star Clusters Hang Out?

Once the authors had their updated ages for the clusters, they then mapped out where the clusters were located in Stephan’s Quintet and how these clusters traced the known tidal structures in the group. Tidal structures are structures, usually consisting of gas, dust, and stars, that are formed from the tidal forces galaxies exert on one another as they interact and merge. The authors found that throughout all tidal regions of Stephan’s Quintet, there were many young, low-mass star clusters, all about 3–5 million years old. This timescale lines up with previous studies’ estimates of when NGC 7318B was thought to first fall into Stephan’s Quintet, compressing the gas in the group and creating tidal shocks that would trigger star formation.

Additionally, the authors’ star cluster age distribution for the group (see Figure 2) has a second, broader peak of higher-mass clusters with ages around 200 million years. This would correspond to when the most recent encounter between NGC 7320C (which has now passed through the group and is out of frame in Figure 1) and NGC 7319 is estimated to have occurred.

Going even older, they found that the star clusters in the group that are more than 1 billion years old are also the most massive, and they are predominantly concentrated around NGC 7318A. This is the most massive elliptical galaxy in the group, and it’s the most likely to have a rich, old star cluster population, formed prior to any tidal interactions.

Taken together, the updated age measurements of the star clusters in Stephan’s Quintet provide not only a study of star formation history, but also of the galaxy–galaxy interaction history in the system!

Looking Ahead

While the authors have improved the age estimates of the clusters in Stephan’s Quintet, there are still limitations to their analysis. Their estimated star formation rate for the group is much lower than that estimated with other tracers, such as H-alpha emission, meaning this study may still be missing a fraction of very young star clusters. The most likely culprits are embedded clusters that haven’t had enough time to expel the surrounding gas from the massive clouds they formed within.

Future work will attempt to identify these embedded clusters using near-infrared JWST imaging, since in this study the authors focused only on the previously HST-identified clusters. In addition, combining their JWST data with high-resolution radio observations taken with the Atacama Large Millimeter/submillimeter Array will allow them to study the gas in the group more closely and understand how it influences the star formation.

This work highlights JWST’s excellent application to star cluster observations, building on the data we already have from decades of HST use, and it looks like we’re only just getting started!

Original astrobite edited by Skylar Grayson.

About the author, Veronika Dornan:

Veronika is a postdoctoral research associate at the University of Edinburgh. Her research is in observations of globular star clusters and how they can be used to study the evolution of their host galaxies.

The post Astronomers Hate Them! This Star Formation Ingredient Makes Clusters Look 300 Million Years Older appeared first on AAS Nova.

Editor’s Note: Astrobites is a graduate-student-run organization that digests astrophysical literature for undergraduate students. As part of the partnership between the AAS and astrobites, we occasionally repost astrobites content here at AAS Nova. We hope you enjoy this post from astrobites; the original can be viewed at astrobites.org.

Title: The First Day of a Type Ia Supernova from a Double-Degenerate Binary
Authors: Gabriel Kumar, Logan J. Prust, and Lars Bildsten
First Author’s Institution: University of California, Santa Barbara
Status: Published in ApJ

Much like distance markers along the highway, Type Ia supernovae have long been used as distance indicators in space. These supernovae were originally theorized to form in binary systems. In this system, a white dwarf (a dense, collapsed remnant of a star) steals surface material from a non-degenerate star like our Sun and then explodes. Because of the initial conditions and properties of those two stars, the explosion would shine with the same intrinsic brightness regardless of the binary system’s location in space.

Research and observations, however, show that this is not entirely true; not all Type Ia supernovae are equally luminous. There are various theories regarding the different formation scenarios and explosion mechanisms that might create a Type Ia supernova. Developing ways to sleuth out the origins of these systems can be useful because it may tell us more about their luminosity.

One emerging theory of formation is the “double-detonation scenario.” In this case, two white dwarfs exist in a binary system. The more massive primary (the “accretor”) steals material from the less massive white dwarf secondary (the “donor”). After the primary steals the donor’s outer thin shell of helium, the helium surrounding the accretor detonates. This explosion induces a shock wave that travels into the dense core of the accretor and causes another detonation. The two detonations — one on the surface and one in the core — produce enough energy to explode the star into a supernova, a powerful stellar explosion. When the material from the exploding star reaches its companion star, it forms a mysterious, conical wake within the gaseous material, or “ejecta,” expelled from the accretor. This wake might be an important clue for distinguishing a supernova’s origins.

Since these explosions are incredibly powerful and would be difficult (and dangerous!) to perform in a lab, astronomers turn to computer simulations to model these events. Hydrodynamical simulations, in particular, are helpful for researchers because they model how fluids “flow” by solving complex equations that are too tricky to do by hand. (Remember that stars are just balls of gas, and hence fluid!) The authors of today’s article ran hydrodynamical simulations of the explosion and subsequent evolution of the ejecta from a double-detonation scenario.

In the diagram of the team’s setup (see Fig. 1), you can see a “bow shock.” This shock is from the wave produced in the accretor’s detonation and is bowed since it bends around the donor star. This shock moves quickly through the cone of ejecta, modifies its structure, and leaves clues within the ejecta as it settles.

After simulating 1,000 seconds after the explosion, the authors recreated a high-density, low-temperature “wake” from the shock. You can see imprints of this wake in Fig. 2, as denoted by the red arrow. Once they were able to produce this wake, the authors evolved the ejecta over time to see what the radiation from this material might reveal. They discovered that the “shocked,” or compressed and heated, ejecta flew out much further than the unshocked ejecta (see Fig. 3). This ejecta can be seen from different viewing angles, influencing an observer’s measurement of the explosion’s luminosity. The strongest features of the wake are visible up to about 55 degrees, while some effects can still be seen up to about 140 degrees — almost half of the sky (see Fig. 4). Overall, an observer’s position relative to the explosion axis might change their reported luminosity of the explosion. The authors estimate that this wake might cause Type Ia supernovae from a “double-detonation” scenario to appear up to 15% fainter, depending on the observer’s viewing angle. Therefore, if scientists use Type Ia supernovae as cosmic distance indicators, their calibrations might be slightly off. This isn’t the best news for those using measurements of Type Ia supernovae to measure the expansion rate of the universe. We’ve talked a lot about the accretor and ejecta in this scenario, but what might happen to the donor star? One idea is that the donor star is “kicked” away by the high velocity of the blast. In this simulation, the authors were able to calculate a “kick” velocity, or speed imparted by the blast to the donor star, that was much higher than estimates from other detonation models. One observed Type Ia supernova, SN 2021aefx, is believed to have the fastest observed ejecta to date. The mechanism that today’s authors modeled might explain how the ejecta of this event got its super-fast “kick.”

While there is always more work to be done, this work presents a first step at identifying double-detonation Type Ia supernovae from early observations. With an influx of observations from new observatories, like the Vera C. Rubin Observatory, we should expect to see many more early supernova detections.

Original astrobite edited by Ansh Gupta.

About the author, Mckenzie Ferrari:

I’m currently a PhD student in the geophysical sciences program at the University of Chicago. While I now study the atmosphere and oceans of Earth, most of my previous research focused on simulations of Type Ia supernovae and galaxy formation and evolution. In my free time, I foster cats for a local organization, enjoy cooking, and can often be found running along Lake Michigan.

The post Ia’m Just Getting Started: A Type Ia Supernova’s First Day appeared first on AAS Nova.

Editor’s Note: Astrobites is a graduate-student-run organization that digests astrophysical literature for undergraduate students. As part of the partnership between the AAS and astrobites, we occasionally repost astrobites content here at AAS Nova. We hope you enjoy this post from astrobites; the original can be viewed at astrobites.org.

Title: Episodic Feedback in Triple Active Galactic Nucleus Candidate SDSS J0849+1114 Revealed by Extended Ionized Gas
Authors: Xiaoyu Xu (许啸宇) et al.
First Author’s Institution: Nanjing University
Status: Published in ApJ

When Galaxies Collide

Galaxies are social creatures; they interact and merge (more astrobites talking about this are here and here)! When galaxies collide, the gravitational chaos acts like a funnel, driving massive amounts of cold gas toward the center. This gas rush has two major consequences: it triggers intense bursts of star formation (known as starbursts), and it feeds the central supermassive black holes, activating them as active galactic nuclei (AGNs).

But the story doesn’t end there. These powerful AGNs don’t just sit and feast on the gas. They launch high-velocity winds or jets that push back against the incoming gas, a process known as AGN feedback. (Read more about it in Astrobites here and here.) This feedback is thought to be the key mechanism by which supermassive black holes regulate their host galaxies, either by heating and expelling the gas (negative feedback, which starves star formation) or, in some cases, by compressing it (positive feedback, which promotes star formation).

While binary AGNs (two AGNs in one merging system) are rare, finding systems with three AGNs in one system is fascinatingly rare. The galaxy SDSS J0849+1114 (J0849+1114) is one such system, featuring three Seyfert 2 AGNs, a type of active galaxy with a bright, compact nucleus whose spectrum shows only narrow emission lines, within a tight region of about 5 kiloparsecs (kpc) or 16,000 light-years. Studying this system gives us a front-row seat to how multiple black holes interact and regulate their host environment during a complex merger. Very Large Array observations reveal that nucleus A (see Figure 1) contains two jets, inner and outer. In contrast, nucleus C has one jet, providing further evidence for the presence of an AGN.

Peering into the Triple Core with VLT/MUSE

To understand the gas dynamics in J0849+1114, the authors used the Very Large Telescope (VLT) and its Multi-Unit Spectroscopic Explorer (MUSE) instrument. MUSE is an integral-field spectrograph, meaning it provides spectra for every single spatial pixel (or “spaxel”) across the field of view. This allows astronomers to map not just where the light is coming from, but how the gas is moving and what is causing it to glow, all resolved spatially across the galaxy.

The main technique employed was two-component Gaussian fitting of key emission lines like hydrogen alpha (Hα) and ionized oxygen ([O III]λλ4959,5007), which can be seen in Figure 2. The width of a Gaussian line (or its velocity dispersion) in a spectrum tells us how fast the gas is moving. A narrow line means the gas is relatively calm, with most of it moving at similar speeds. A broader line, on the other hand, means the gas velocities are more spread out — some parts are racing toward us, others away — indicating turbulence or outflows. By comparing the widths of different components, astronomers can separate quiet, rotating gas from the high-speed winds launched by the active black holes.

What They Found: Gas Tails and Outflows

The VLT/MUSE observations successfully characterized both the undisturbed (First Component) and turbulent (Second Component) gas across the system.

1. Galactic-Scale Tidal Tails

The slow-moving gas (First Component) revealed extended structures of ionized gas stretching over 10 kpc (33,000 light-years), and in some directions, even more than 15 kpc (49,000 light-years) away from nucleus A. These large, low-velocity gas clouds align well with features known as tidal tails: the stretched-out arms of gas and stars pulled away by the violent gravitational forces of the merger.

2. Two Distinct Outflows Driven by Radio Jets

The fast-moving gas (Second Component) clearly showed two distinct sites: outflows originating from nucleus A and nucleus C.

• Outflow A: This outflow extends over 5 kpc (16,000 light-years) around nucleus A. The gas kinematics and geometry strongly suggest that this outflow is being driven by nucleus A’s radio jet. This finding is key, as the measured kinetic power of the outflow is about 10 times stronger than what star formation alone could supply, and the current luminosity of the AGN is also insufficient to power it.
• Outflow C: A smaller but detectable outflow extends about 5.9 kpc (19,000 light-years) around nucleus C, with a lower kinetic power compared to Outflow A. But, like Outflow A, the energetics and velocity gradients suggest this outflow is also linked to nucleus C’s radio jet.

A Black Hole That’s Recently Gone Quiet

The most striking implication of this study relates to the timing of nucleus A’s activity. The presence of extended ionized gas far from the nucleus (in the tidal tails, >10 kpc or 33,000 light-years away) provides a fascinating glimpse into the AGN’s recent past.

The physical conditions of this distant gas were determined using emission line ratios ([O III]/Hα and [N II]/Hα) on the Baldwin, Phillips, and Terlevich (BPT) diagram. A BPT diagram uses emission line ratios to diagnose the energy source that ionizes the gas: star formation, AGN, or shocks. The BPT diagram of J0849+1114 indicates that an AGN currently photoionizes the gas.

By running sophisticated photoionization models, the scientists calculated how luminous nucleus A must have been to ionize the gas currently found 10–15 kpc (33,000–49,000 light-years) away. They discovered that this required nucleus A to be 20–100 times more luminous than it currently is! Since light takes time to travel, and the ionized gas quickly recombines (on timescales of less than 100 years for this gas), this luminous phase must have ended very recently, approximately 30,000–50,000 years ago. This is a long time for us, but just a blink of an eye on cosmic timescales.

The Episode of Self-Regulation

By integrating the findings across different wavelengths and timescales, the current faint luminosity state, the past luminous state inferred from the distant gas, and the presence of radio jets of different ages, the authors propose a model of episodic AGN feedback in nucleus A:

1. Past Activity (150,000 years ago): An active phase likely launched an outer radio jet, which subsequently drove the large-scale ionized gas outflow observed today.
2. Peak Ionization (30,000–50,000 years ago): A subsequent burst of high accretion reached its peak, ionizing the distant tidal tails.
3. Fading and Quenching (Today): The energy released by the jet and/or outflow during the active phase likely expelled or heated the surrounding gas (negative feedback), causing the central accretion disk to run out of fuel. The AGN has since faded rapidly to its current low-accretion state, marked by the appearance of a young inner radio jet.

A Quiet Ending After a Loud Beginning

J0849+1114 is not just a statistical anomaly as a triple AGN candidate; it serves as a crucial case study demonstrating the powerful and rapid effects of AGN feedback. High-resolution observations confirm that violent galaxy mergers trigger both powerful outflows and episodic bursts of extreme luminosity. Crucially, these outflows clear the gas and cause the central supermassive black hole to quickly fade from a luminous quasar phase to a quiet, low-accretion state within tens of thousands of years. This system provides strong, spatially resolved evidence that AGN feedback rapidly suppresses accretion onto the supermassive black hole and shapes the host galaxy on kiloparsec scales during the chaotic drama of galactic mergers.

Original astrobite edited by Lindsey Gordon.

About the author, Sowkhya Shanbhog:

I am currently a first-year PhD student at Scuola Normale Superiore in Pisa, Italy, where I am focusing on studying high-redshift quasars. Prior to this, I completed a dual BS-MS degree at the Indian Institute of Science Education and Research in Pune, India. Now, I am eager to expand my involvement in science communication and outreach initiatives. I have recently developed an interest in cooking, particularly since moving to a new city. I find solace in listening to music during my leisure time.

The post A Triple Black Hole System Caught in the Act of Self-Quenching appeared first on AAS Nova.

Editor’s Note: Astrobites is a graduate-student-run organization that digests astrophysical literature for undergraduate students. As part of the partnership between the AAS and astrobites, we occasionally repost astrobites content here at AAS Nova. We hope you enjoy this post from astrobites; the original can be viewed at astrobites.org.

Title: Near the Runaway: The Climate and Habitability of Teegarden’s Star b
Authors: Ryan Boukrouche, Rodrigo Caballero, and Neil T. Lewis
First Author’s Institution: Stockholm University
Status: Published in ApJL

To find life on other planets, we start our search for planets like Earth. (It’s the best example of a habitable planet that we know of!) Earth’s distance from the Sun allows for liquid water to exist on the surface, which is vital for life as we know it. This region, called the “habitable zone,” describes the right atmospheric conditions and proximity to its host star that a planet can have to support liquid water. Earth is also special because of its atmosphere, which contains greenhouse gases such as water vapor and carbon dioxide (CO₂); these help keep the average global temperature moderate enough for life to exist.

A few factors govern the habitable zone for a given planetary system: for example, the strength of a star’s radiation, the composition of the planet’s atmosphere, and a planet’s orbital period around its star. This is because a planet’s “energy budget” is dictated by these factors. For a planet to have a “stable” climate, the energy it receives from its star must balance the energy it re-emits. For instance, in a given planetary system, the closer a planet’s orbit is to its host star, the more sunlight it receives and therefore the more energy it must radiate away. This balance is between outgoing longwave radiation, which is heat emitted by the planet, and absorbed/incoming shortwave radiation, which is the sunlight the planet receives from its host star.

Some Earth-like analog planets have piqued the interest of astronomers because observations suggest that they lie within the habitable zones of their respective stars. One system, named after its discoverer, Bonnard Teegarden, features an M-dwarf star with three orbiting Earth-mass planets. It exists about 12.5 light-years away, making it one of the closest planetary systems to us. One of the planets, Teegarden’s Star b, is believed to have very similar characteristics to Earth: a radius of 1.02 R_Earth and a mass of 1.16 M_Earth. Because the planet orbits an M-dwarf star, which is much cooler (temperature-wise) and less massive than our Sun, the planet’s orbit is much, much smaller than Earth’s, with a semimajor axis of 0.0259 au (compared to 1 au for Earth) and an orbital period of 4.9 days (compared to 365 days for Earth).

The authors of today’s article explore how close Teegarden’s Star b is to its habitable zone based on current observations, and how future observations could lead to vastly different interpretations of its habitability.

Exoplanets are small and faint, making it difficult for current technology to study their atmospheres accurately. Modern simulations, known as general circulation models, can model how a planet’s atmosphere might behave under various assumptions. Isca, the climate and atmospheric dynamics model used in this article, has been used to model exoplanetary atmospheres in previous studies. Modeling a planet around an M-dwarf, the authors tried matching the planet’s properties as closely as possible to Earth, using a simple cloud model (which is challenging to model), moist physics (since our atmosphere contains water vapor), and a radiative transfer scheme. In their simulation, the authors also assumed that Teegarden’s Star b is tidally locked, meaning its dayside always faces its sun. For example, our Moon always shows the same side to us on Earth and is considered tidally locked.

They also assigned Teegarden’s Star b a similar atmospheric composition to Earth: 78% nitrogen (N₂), 28% oxygen (O₂), and a CO₂ concentration of 400 parts per million by volume (ppmv). Unlike Earth, they did not include an ozone layer; however, they state that including one did not significantly change the results. Combinations of these different factors were run for 8–41 Earth years, until the Teegarden’s Star b model either reached a stable state (where the energy balance equals 0 W/m²), or it exceeded the runaway greenhouse gas threshold — the point at which the energy balance exceeds zero, and the planet’s surface temperature increases uncontrollably.

The average amount of radiation that a planet receives is called its instellation, or sometimes “insolation” when talking about our Sun. For reference, Earth has an insolation value of around 1365 W/m². Different studies of Teegarden’s Star b suggest an instellation of 1481 W/m² or 1565 W/m², so the authors multiple values in that range (see Fig. 1).

The biggest difference in results comes from the two different instellation values of 1480 and 1565 W/m² (see Fig. 2). For 1480 W/m², Teegarden’s Star b lies just within the habitable zone, but admittedly not by much. It’s only about 20–40 W/m² away from becoming uninhabitable. This would give Teegarden’s Star b a mean surface temperature about 18K higher than that of present-day Earth. Since a difference of one Kelvin is equivalent to a difference of one degree Celsius, this corresponds to a temperature of 18℃ (32.4℉) above your average day on Earth — pretty hot and unlikely to be comfortable for lifeforms similar to ours. The precipitation would also be similar to the wettest regions of the Sahara Desert, so overall, Teegarden’s Star b would be a relatively dry planet. For 1565 W/m², Teegarden’s Star b crosses the runaway greenhouse threshold and cannot be considered habitable for life similar to ours. Our best guess of the habitability of Teegarden’s Star b is highly dependent on future observations and measurements. A slight change in the estimate of the planet’s instellation could have drastic consequences for its habitability. The assumptions of the authors’ model — its atmospheric composition and how heat and moisture are transported through the atmosphere — might also affect this habitability. We don’t quite know why Earth has its particular atmospheric composition, especially 78% N₂, so why might Teegarden’s Star b have the same? A CO₂ concentration of 400 ppmv also aligns with present-day Earth values, but pre-industrial CO₂ levels on Earth were approximately 280 ppmv. As for future observations, it might be possible to measure the potential presence of N₂ through indirect ways using the Large Interferometer For Exoplanets (LIFE). Teegarden’s Star b is still a promising Earth analog, but we’ll need better information in the future to constrain some of these assumptions.

Original astrobite edited by Joe Williams.

About the author, Mckenzie Ferrari:

I’m currently a PhD student in the geophysical sciences program at the University of Chicago. While I now study the atmosphere and oceans of Earth, most of my previous research focused on simulations of Type Ia supernovae and galaxy formation and evolution. In my free time, I foster cats for a local organization, enjoy cooking, and can often be found running along Lake Michigan.

The post Teegarden’s Star b: (Almost) Too Hot to Handle? appeared first on AAS Nova.

Editor’s Note: Astrobites is a graduate-student-run organization that digests astrophysical literature for undergraduate students. As part of the partnership between the AAS and astrobites, we occasionally repost astrobites content here at AAS Nova. We hope you enjoy this post from astrobites; the original can be viewed at astrobites.org.

Title: X-Ray Investigation of Possible Super-Eddington Accretion in a Radio-Loud Quasar at z = 6.13
Authors: Luca Ighina et al.
First Author’s Institution: Harvard–Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics and Italian National Institute for Astrophysics
Status: Published in ApJL

Quasars are some of the most extreme objects in the entire universe. Despite being as far as tens of billions of light-years away, they nonetheless can appear as bright as some stars in our own Milky Way. To put their brightness in perspective, one just has to consider the Sun. Compared to puny human scales, our star is a truly gargantuan object. It’s a fully functional fusion reactor, churning hydrogen into helium in its core and outputting an unfathomable amount of energy in the process. This glowing furnace is so bright that it can cook us with the heat of an oven during the day, even at a distance of more than 90 million miles (about 8 light-minutes). That distance dramatically dilutes the radiation of the Sun by the time it reaches us, as we only receive a small sliver of its total output, and yet we can still feel its heat pounding down on us when we stand beneath a clear summer sky.

However, if one were to move the Sun about 30 light-years away, it would appear completely unremarkable. You’d need to be under relatively dark skies to even spot it! The vastness of space would simply crush the output of our solar engine; however, if you place a luminous quasar at that same 30 light-year distance, its searing radiation would seem to effortlessly cross the cosmic gulf looming between the stars, scorching us relentlessly with the same heat as the Sun does today. The power of a quasar simply puts our star to shame.

Still, even quasars have limits. The source of power for these objects is a supermassive black hole. The supermassive black hole that lives at the center of our Milky Way is currently dormant. However, many supermassive black holes (especially in the early universe) actively gulp down matter, releasing tremendous energy that escapes in the form of radiation across the electromagnetic spectrum. The escaping photons bump into particles on their way out, exerting an outward pressure. If enough light is unleashed by the quasar, this pressure will actually balance against the pull of gravity, cutting off the food supply for the black hole. This negative feedback loop means that a given quasar has an upper limit to its brightness, called the Eddington luminosity, and to the speed at which it accretes matter, called the Eddington rate. The authors of today’s bite examine a particularly misbehaved quasar that seems to violate even these extreme limits.

It’s a Bird! It’s a Plane! It’s a Jet?

The authors observed the quasar RACS J032021.44−352104.1 (RACS J0320−35 for short) with several radio observatories, including the Giant Metrewave Radio Telescope, the Australia Telescope Compact Array, and the Australian Large Baseline Array. Combining this data with publicly available observations, they find that the source is “radio-loud,” or bright at very long wavelengths. Typically, this kind of emission is expected to be generated by powerful jets that are ejected from the poles of a quasar. For example, the authors compare this radio-loud quasar to similar sources, which show significant variability in the X-ray part of the spectrum. This is a tell-tale sign that the X-ray emission is also generated by these jets (which might come out in fits and spurts and thus cause fluctuations in brightness over time).

However, when the authors examine X-ray data of RACS J0320−35 taken by the Chandra X-ray Observatory, they find surprising results. The quasar is extremely luminous in X-rays, making it one of the brightest in the early universe. But despite the fact that it pumps out a huge number of these energetic photons, it seems to preferentially emit only the lower-energy band of X-rays and completely lacks the highest-energy emission that characterizes similar sources. In technical terms, the X-ray spectrum of RACS J0320−35 is incredibly “soft.” Moreover, this X-ray emission seems to be constant on the timescale of months, though further observations will be required to test if it varies on longer timescales. Still, the softness of the spectrum and weak variability of this system mean that its X-ray emission is unlikely to be produced by a jet.

The authors carefully consider a particular variety of jet — one that is sharply angled towards us. Since quasar jets often travel at incredible speeds, the special theory of relativity kicks in and causes strange behaviors. In particular, an effect called relativistic beaming can cause a source to appear much brighter if traveling towards the observer at extremely high speeds. However, they find that although relativistic beaming can explain the mysterious X-ray properties of RACS J0320−35, such a scenario is incompatible with its observed radio emission. Moreover, a lack of gamma-ray emission and weak variability are further pieces of evidence against the jet origin of the X-ray emission.

Limits Are Meant to Be Broken

The article presents one more fascinating possibility for the origin of the X-rays in this source. Some theoretical work and simulations show that if a black hole breaks the Eddington limit and starts accreting matter at “super-Eddington rates,” the X-ray spectrum that results can be incredibly soft. The authors find excellent agreement between the observations and the predictions from a particular model that simulates a very slowly spinning black hole (see Figure 1). This scenario seems to be a promising explanation for the X-ray emission in RACS J0320−35, which is extremely exciting for several reasons.

Many astronomers are considering super-Eddington accretion to explain the masses of early quasars and their fainter counterparts, called active galactic nuclei. Because supermassive black holes are supposed to have a cap on their accretion rate (the Eddington limit), the earliest black holes in the universe should only have been able to reach large sizes after sufficient time had passed. Astonishingly, observations from JWST are finding massive active galactic nuclei everywhere in the early universe, which seems to violate this — these black holes appear astonishingly massive despite existing for only a fraction of the universe’s current age. However, if early black holes could grow faster than expected by undergoing super-Eddington accretion, this tension might be resolved.

Despite the promising initial results of this model, there are a few caveats to the results presented in today’s article. For example, the radio jets observed from this source require a rapidly spinning black hole, which conflicts with the model assumptions. The authors note that a radio jet can be very far from a black hole, tracing its past activity. In fact, this jet may have actually spun down the central supermassive black hole by extracting energy from it, a fascinating possibility that will require both further observations and simulations to explore. Today’s bite shines a brilliant light on this possibility by analyzing RACS J0320−35, a fascinating quasar in the early universe and a stunning example that cosmic limits are meant to be broken.

Original astrobite edited by Veronika Dornan.

About the author, Ansh Gupta:

I’m an astronomy graduate student at the University of Texas at Austin working with Steven Finkelstein. I use data from JWST to study the formation and growth of the first galaxies and black holes in the universe. In my spare time, I enjoy playing piano, reading, and making YouTube videos.

The post The Winner of the Cosmic Speed-Eating Contest appeared first on AAS Nova.

Editor’s Note: Astrobites is a graduate-student-run organization that digests astrophysical literature for undergraduate students. As part of the partnership between the AAS and astrobites, we occasionally repost astrobites content here at AAS Nova. We hope you enjoy this post from astrobites; the original can be viewed at astrobites.org.

Title: The Fate of EMRI-IMRI Pairs in Active Galactic Nucleus Accretion Disks: Hydrodynamical and Three-body Simulations
Authors: Peng Peng et al.
First Author’s Institution: Peking University
Status: Published in ApJ

Active galactic nuclei (AGNs) are the extremely luminous central regions of some galaxies, powered by gas accreting onto their supermassive black holes and often outshining the entire galaxy in which they reside. One reason they are so studied in astronomy is that they connect many pieces of physics and astronomy in one cosmic place. This is especially true for AGNs as potential gravitational wave sources. Gravitational waves are observed when two compact objects, usually black holes, orbit each other. Black holes span a massive range of masses, but they are typically categorized into one of three categories: stellar-mass black holes, or sBHs (tens to hundreds of times the mass of the Sun), intermediate-mass black holes or IMBHs (hundreds to thousands of times the mass of the Sun), and supermassive black holes or SMBHs (millions to billions of times the mass of the Sun). AGNs are special because they are among the very few places where black holes across this entire mass spectrum might be found in the same place at the same time. Not only do they host SMBHs at their centers, but their gas disks are ideal nurseries for capturing and growing sBHs and IMBHs.

Current-generation gravitational wave detectors like the LIGO–Virgo–KAGRA (LVK) network can observe stellar-mass to lite-IMBH black hole mergers. Future detectors like the Laser Interferometer Space Antenna (LISA) will be able to observe black holes in the intermediate-mass to supermassive mass range. In addition to the mass range a detector can detect, it is also valuable to know the mass ratio (usually denoted by q) that a detector might detect. Unequal-mass-ratio mergers can tell us a lot about general relativity that more equal-mass mergers cannot because the smaller object orbits the more massive one many times right before the merger, essentially providing a gravitational wave measurement of spacetime around the larger black hole. (See this video for an example of black hole orbits with a large mass ratio, and imagine the spacetime observations around the larger black hole that could be possible with orbits like that.)

One of the most promising advances in gravitational wave detection with LISA will come with the observation of extreme-mass-ratio inspirals (EMRIs), usually defined as involving a smaller black hole that is at least 10,000 times less massive than the massive black hole it orbits (though the exact mass ratio defining an EMRI is a matter of convention and may vary somewhat). In addition, LISA will be able to observe intermediate-mass-ratio inspirals (IMRIs), usually defined as when the smaller black hole is 100–10,000 times less massive than the larger one.

This article uses multiple techniques to address the question of what happens when an AGN disk hosts both an IMBH and an sBH at the same time. The authors began with a hydrodynamic simulation of an AGN gas disk around a 10⁶-solar-mass SMBH. They add a 10³-solar-mass IMBH into the gas disk. Because the IMBH orbits within a gas disk, the gas exerts a force on it, causing its orbit to shrink toward the SMBH (a process called migration). Additionally, the IMBH carves out a path through the gas. Once the IMBH carves out enough of a path in the gas, the authors add an sBH of 20 solar masses into the simulation near the IMBH.

The authors test the sBH outcome for two initial conditions of the gas disk. The first, which I will refer to as “InnerDisk,” is when gas already exists inside the IMBH’s orbit (see Figure 1). The other, which I will refer to as “NoInnerDisk,” is when the simulation begins with gas only outside the IMBHs orbit, with no gas initially between the IMBH and SMBH. In this case, gas crosses the IMBH’s gap after the simulation starts. In the InnerDisk case, the sBH initially gets pushed inward from the presence of the inner gas, but that gas steadily drains into the SMBH and is only partly refilled, so the gas’s push on the sBH weakens over time. In the NoInnerDisk case, the IMBH’s direct pull on the sBH becomes more important. The amount of gas that leaks across the IMBH orbit into the inner disk gradually settles into a steady state that is less dense than the InnerDisk case. With a weaker gas push, the sBH stays closely tied to the IMBH and migrates inward at nearly the same rate. In both setups, the IMBH carves a gap in the gas and keeps moving inward, but the presence and evolution of inner gas chiefly determine how closely the sBH can keep up.

Once the sBH and IMBH migrate close enough to the SMBH, gravitational waves are responsible for more and more of the energy loss and orbital decay of the system compared to the gas. To account for that, once the sBH and IMBH migrate close enough to the SMBH, instead of using a hydrodynamic simulation of a gas disk, the authors switch over to a “three-body problem” solver. Because these are black holes emitting gravitational waves, regular old Newtonian mechanics is insufficient, so they add post-Newtonian terms to correct for this. Additionally, though they no longer model the gas hydrodynamically, they do include terms for a gas “force” acting on the black holes to mimic the gas disk.

Once the IMBH and sBH were in the gravitational regime, their outcomes became much more chaotic. As seen in Figure 2, a slight change in the initial phase angle of the sBH can lead to drastically different consequences for the system. In some cases, the sBH is ejected entirely. In other instances, it merges with the IMBH soon after the simulation begins. Yet in others, it first merges with the SMBH. This leads to one overall message of this article: the orbits of the IMBH and sBH tend to be regular with some gentle variation when they are farther out in the gas disk, but they become highly chaotic once they shrink into the gravitational wave regime closer to the central SMBH.

AGN disks may provide a natural setting for interactions among stellar-mass, intermediate-mass, and supermassive black holes. The authors of this article demonstrated that gas can keep an IMBH and an inner sBH migrating together until gravitational waves dominate, after which slight differences in their orbital phases can lead to a wide range of outcomes. While uncertainties remain, this study provides more evidence that LISA could identify. Until LISA flies, continued simulations like this one will help refine the spectrum of EMRIs and IMRIs we can expect to see.

Original astrobite edited by Maggie Verrico.

About the author, William Smith:

Bill is a graduate student in the astrophysics program at Vanderbilt University. He studies gravitational wave populations with a focus on how these populations can help inform cosmology as part of the LIGO Scientific Collaboration. Outside of astrophysics, he also enjoys swimming semi-competitively, music and dancing, cooking, and making the academy a better place for people to live and work.

The post The Black Hole Meetup: EMRIs and IMRIs in the Same Active Galactic Nucleus Disk appeared first on AAS Nova.