Astronomers once thought winds generated by supermassive black holes affected only their host galaxies, but a recent study found that their energy can also reach surrounding galaxies. Winds from a supermassive black hole can carry energy far beyond the galaxy that contains it. New observations show that this influence can extend roughly 300,000 light-years and [...]
Researchers have detected molecules containing rings and chains of carbon atoms in the vicinity of a rare pair of quasars. The trends in the distribution of these molecules are unexpected, suggesting that more work is needed to understand the conditions surrounding active supermassive black holes.
Examples of aromatic and aliphatic hydrocarbons. Benzene (top left) is the simplest aromatic molecule. Propane (top right) is a simple aliphatic molecule. Propylbenzene (bottom) is an aromatic molecule with an aliphatic chain branching off of it. In these “skeletal” formulae, there is a carbon atom at each vertex, and the remaining atoms (not depicted) are all hydrogens. Single lines indicate single chemical bonds, and double lines indicate double bonds. [Wikipedia; Public Domain]
JWST’s sensitive infrared eyes have allowed researchers to study the distribution, creation, and destruction of both aromatic (containing one or more rings of carbon atoms in which certain electrons spread out within the ring) and aliphatic (containing chains of carbon atoms) hydrocarbons. These molecules have been spotted in a wide array of environments, and now, astronomers are finding them in more distant and more extreme environments than ever before.
SDSS J074922.96+225511.7, or J0749+2255 for short, is a quasar pair seen 3 billion years after the Big Bang. The two feasting supermassive black holes are roughly 12,000 light-years apart, giving researchers a glimpse into the late stages of a galaxy merger and a harsh environment in which to study the survival and destruction of molecules.
Researchers studying J0749+2255 with JWST have previously reported the detection of a 3.3-μm emission feature from aromatic molecules. Now, C. E. Mentzer (University of Missouri), Aigen Li (University of Missouri), and Xuejuan Yang (Xiangtan University) have analyzed JWST spectra of J0749+2255 and found not just widespread aromatic emission at a rest-frame wavelength of 3.3 μm, but also aliphatic emission at 3.4 μm, which they attribute to carbon chains branching off from the aromatic molecules. This likely makes J0749+2255 the most distant galaxy in which both aromatic and aliphatic emission has been detected.
Aliphatic fractions in the bright central region surrounding the two quasars (top) and in the outer regions (bottom). [Mentzer et al. 2026]
Mentzer, Li, and Yang subdivided the observations into 47 regions and measured the strength of the 3.3- and 3.4-μm features in each region. This analysis found strong aromatic emission nearest the quasars and showed that the fraction of carbon atoms bound up in aliphatic chains is highest close to the quasars.
Both of these findings are unexpected: the harsh radiation environment near the two active black holes is thought to break apart chains of carbon atoms attached to aromatic rings (which should decrease the 3.4-μm emission) and possibly destroy small aromatic molecules (which should decrease the 3.3-μm emission) — yet both of these features are strongest near the quasar cores where the radiation should be most capable of molecular destruction.
The authors speculated that the analysis regions centered on the quasars are large enough that they contain gas that hasn’t been pummeled by the quasars’ intense radiation and outflows, leaving molecules intact and able to produce the observed emission. However, this doesn’t explain the trend of stronger 3.3- and 3.4-μm emission closer to the quasars — necessitating further research into the emitting behavior of aromatic and aliphatic molecules under the extreme conditions of a dual quasar’s neighborhood.
“Widespread Detection of Aromatic and Aliphatic Emission in the Dual Quasar J0749+2255 at Cosmic Noon,” C. E. Mentzer et al 2026 ApJL 1005 L38. doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ae7e86
The post Researchers Spot Hydrocarbons Surprisingly Close to a Quasar Pair appeared first on AAS Nova.
The European Space Agency’s (ESA) Euclid Space Telescope has just revealed new evidence for the existence of more than two-and-a-half dozen objects that are among the oldest and most remote in the universe.
These 31 massive objects, known as quasars, rank among the oldest objects astronomers have ever seen, including two that are believed to originate from a period in the universe when our cosmos was only 5% of its current age.
The discoveries, revealed in a new study appearing in the journal Astronomy & Astrophysics, provide a remarkable look at the earliest generations of galaxies, as well as a rare look at the dynamics of the ancient black holes that once powered them.
As some of the brightest objects anywhere in our universe, quasars are remote objects resembling stars in appearance that emit unprecedented amounts of energy. They are the result of creation processes that involve enormous quantities of gas and dust, which spiral into supermassive black holes.
During the gravity-driven inward acceleration process, immense friction causes temperatures that can reach millions of degrees, which generates large amounts of energy. The resulting celestial features produce enough light to outshine entire galaxies.
Despite their brightness, the 31 newest additions to our growing collection of known quasars were difficult for astronomers to spot, given their extreme distances from Earth. The light that documents their ancient presence in the universe has traveled more than 13 billion years to make its way here, causing it to be extremely faint, and thereby very difficult to distinguish from surrounding stars whose light normally outshines them with ease.
A dozen of the newly discovered collection of quasars date to within the first 770 million years our universe existed. Add to that the fact that two of the ancient objects are believed to have formed just 670 million years after the Big Bang—at such ages, these quasars are among the oldest astronomers have ever observed.
The weight of the discoveries goes beyond just record-breaking astronomical observations, since the data they provide could help astrophysicists unravel some of the most enduring mysteries of cosmology. For instance, these quasars could help to reveal answers to questions about how supermassive black holes grew so quickly while the universe was still in its infancy.
Additionally, studying these energetic ancient giants could help to provide new insights into the formation of the earliest galaxies and the evolution of the universe while it was still in its relative infancy.
The recent research, led by the ESA and with contributions from its partners at NASA, has helped to place the Euclid mission in an ideal place to carry out its mission of mapping billions of galaxies. Doing so may help scientists uncover clues about the questions surrounding mysterious dark energy, which is widely believed to be the force behind the accelerating expansion of the cosmos.
Additionally, the Euclid mission’s findings could be pivotal in helping shape the future work of NASA’s Nancy Grace Roman Space Telescope, which will continue the quest to unravel the nature of dark energy and help astronomers understand the nature of the universe at large scales. Additional details about the recent quasar discoveries by Euclid can be found at the ESA’s website and on NASA’s FAQ page.
The new findings were detailed in a recent study, “Euclid: Discovery of 31 new quasars at 6.6 < z < 7.8” published in Astronomy and Astrophysics.
Micah Hanks is the Editor-in-Chief and Co-Founder of The Debrief. A longtime reporter on science, defense, and technology with a focus on space and astronomy, he can be reached at micah@thedebrief.org. Follow him on X @MicahHanks, and at micahhanks.com.
Editor’s Note: Astrobites is a graduate-student-run organization that digests astrophysical literature for undergraduate students. As part of the partnership between the AAS and astrobites, we occasionally repost astrobites content here at AAS Nova. We hope you enjoy this post from astrobites; the original can be viewed at astrobites.org.
Title: The z = 7.08 quasar ULAS J1120+0641 May Never Reach a “Normal” Black Hole to Stellar Mass Ratio
Authors: Meredith A. Stone et al.
First Author’s Institution: University of Arizona
Status: Published in ApJ
The first galaxies in the universe emerged out of an archaic age of darkness. Like luminous factories, they started rapidly churning out stars, spilling light into the cosmos. This process of star formation continues to the present day. In some galaxies, it occurred at astonishing rates, with the equivalent of thousands of times the mass of the Sun being assembled into stars in a single year. At other times, it came to a slow crawl, with all fresh reserves of star-building gas seemingly exhausted. Yet when the gears of star formation ground to a halt, certain events were able to send them spinning again.
One of the most spectacular of these is a merger, a train-wreck collision between two galaxies. Images of these events are often breathtaking, showing arms of light twisting together and vast stellar streams being violently cast away. Mergers directly increase the stellar mass (the mass of all stars) of galaxies by combining two into one. The intense gravitational interactions between the galaxies involved can also disrupt stagnant pools of gas, igniting a new burst of star formation. Thus, interactions between galaxies can be a significant driver of their growth.
Sometimes, a reservoir of matter is driven toward the center of a galaxy due to a “secular” process (one that occurs without external intervention) or from a merger. At the galactic nucleus, the infalling streams of matter encounter a supermassive black hole. The matter falls into a swirling accretion disk, heating to extreme temperatures and furiously glowing. If the black hole is massive enough and the gas falls in quickly enough, the accretion disk can outshine all of the stars in the galaxy, and we call such a source a quasar. The intense radiation produced by a quasar can impact the entire rest of the galaxy, either suppressing the formation of new stars or sometimes igniting it.
Thus, a galaxy has an important role in the growth of its central supermassive black hole, and vice versa. This connection manifests in complicated ways. Most strikingly, it is thought to be the cause of the correlation between a galaxy’s stellar mass and its central black hole mass. In the nearby universe, galaxies have stellar masses around a thousand times greater than their black hole masses. JWST, our most powerful tool for investigating early galaxies, has given us unprecedented insight into whether this holds up in the distant universe. Though the jury is still out, many researchers are convinced that the answer is a resounding no. We’ve found distant black holes that appear to be nearly equal in mass to their host galaxies, something that’s unfathomable in the local universe.
However, this raises a key question. Black holes and their galaxies grow together, and they started on nearly equal footing. So why do all of the galaxies in the nearby universe appear so much more massive than their black holes? Today’s article underscores this puzzle, pushing it to the breaking point. The authors examine a well-studied quasar, ULAS J1120+0641 (hereafter J1120), which we see as it appeared just 750 million years after the Big Bang. This source has a supermassive black hole containing an astounding 20% the mass of its host galaxy. The shocking part is that, even after carefully accounting for all of the ways this galaxy could grow in the future, there appears to be no way for J1120 ever to reach “normal” proportions.
First, the authors analyze the key observations of J1120 obtained to date. In addition to observations from JWST, this source has been targeted by some of the most powerful astronomical facilities, including the Hubble Space Telescope (optical and near-ultraviolet), the Chandra and XMM-Newton observatories (X-rays), the Atacama Large Millimeter/submillimeter Array (radio/millimeter), and numerous other ground-based telescopes. This incredible dataset provides a detailed picture of J1120 across the electromagnetic spectrum, spanning X-rays to radio emission.
The authors compare various measurements of the black hole’s mass and find that multiple methods yield a similar result of about a billion and a half times the mass of the Sun. Turning to the host galaxy, they estimate the mass of the visible stars, which is more complicated than it sounds — you can’t exactly count them, since the enormous distance between us and J1120 causes it to appear as just a fuzzy blob. They combine this mass with the mass of newly forming stars that are buried in dust and obscured from our view. The mass of a nearby galaxy that’s actively merging with J1120 is added to this sum. Finally, the authors compute how many stars could form in the future from all of the gas left in the galaxy, and they throw this into the total.
Even with all of these components, the host galaxy would only be 10 times more massive than the black hole at the center. This ratio is a far cry from the factor of a thousand we expect for normal galaxies in the local universe!
Well, if one merging galaxy won’t do it, what if J1120 merges with literally every single other nearby galaxy? The authors use new JWST data to count all sources near the quasar (Figure 1) and measure their stellar masses. Going further, they estimate how many galaxies their technique may have missed and add all of these to the pile. Not done yet, they finally conclude by making a rough approximation of how much loose gas is in these nearby galaxies, and compute how much extra mass could exist in stars born from this fresh material. Assuming that J1120 survives the full-frontal assault, being battered by mergers from each of its neighbors in turn, its total stellar mass would grow by quite a large factor.
Figure 1: All of the galaxies found by JWST that are close enough to J1120 to potentially merge with it in the future. The circles mark confident detections, whereas the squares represent galaxies for which the exact distances couldn’t be measured confidently. What would happen if all of these galaxies crashed into J1120? [Stone et al. 2025]
A fascinating final possibility is that galaxies like this one do exist in the nearby universe. With their black hole switched off, all we would be able to see is a relatively small package of stars. Place such an object far enough away, and we might miss it entirely! Whether galaxies like J1120 achieved normal proportions through unknown mechanisms or are lurking in the far fringes of the local universe, studies like this one shine light on the amazing connection between black holes and their host galaxies. In the future, they will be one key piece in the puzzle of the endlessly complicated past of our own galaxy and the universe at large.
Original astrobite edited by Will Golay.
About the author, Ansh Gupta:
I’m an astronomy graduate student at the University of Texas at Austin working with Steven Finkelstein. I use data from JWST to study the formation and growth of the first galaxies and black holes in the universe. In my spare time, I enjoy playing piano, reading, and making YouTube videos.
The post Forever Alone: A Black Hole Destined to Stay Too Big appeared first on AAS Nova.
Editor’s Note: Astrobites is a graduate-student-run organization that digests astrophysical literature for undergraduate students. As part of the partnership between the AAS and astrobites, we occasionally repost astrobites content here at AAS Nova. We hope you enjoy this post from astrobites; the original can be viewed at astrobites.org.
Title: X-Ray Investigation of Possible Super-Eddington Accretion in a Radio-Loud Quasar at z = 6.13
Authors: Luca Ighina et al.
First Author’s Institution: Harvard–Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics and Italian National Institute for Astrophysics
Status: Published in ApJL
Quasars are some of the most extreme objects in the entire universe. Despite being as far as tens of billions of light-years away, they nonetheless can appear as bright as some stars in our own Milky Way. To put their brightness in perspective, one just has to consider the Sun. Compared to puny human scales, our star is a truly gargantuan object. It’s a fully functional fusion reactor, churning hydrogen into helium in its core and outputting an unfathomable amount of energy in the process. This glowing furnace is so bright that it can cook us with the heat of an oven during the day, even at a distance of more than 90 million miles (about 8 light-minutes). That distance dramatically dilutes the radiation of the Sun by the time it reaches us, as we only receive a small sliver of its total output, and yet we can still feel its heat pounding down on us when we stand beneath a clear summer sky.
However, if one were to move the Sun about 30 light-years away, it would appear completely unremarkable. You’d need to be under relatively dark skies to even spot it! The vastness of space would simply crush the output of our solar engine; however, if you place a luminous quasar at that same 30 light-year distance, its searing radiation would seem to effortlessly cross the cosmic gulf looming between the stars, scorching us relentlessly with the same heat as the Sun does today. The power of a quasar simply puts our star to shame.
Still, even quasars have limits. The source of power for these objects is a supermassive black hole. The supermassive black hole that lives at the center of our Milky Way is currently dormant. However, many supermassive black holes (especially in the early universe) actively gulp down matter, releasing tremendous energy that escapes in the form of radiation across the electromagnetic spectrum. The escaping photons bump into particles on their way out, exerting an outward pressure. If enough light is unleashed by the quasar, this pressure will actually balance against the pull of gravity, cutting off the food supply for the black hole. This negative feedback loop means that a given quasar has an upper limit to its brightness, called the Eddington luminosity, and to the speed at which it accretes matter, called the Eddington rate. The authors of today’s bite examine a particularly misbehaved quasar that seems to violate even these extreme limits.
The authors observed the quasar RACS J032021.44−352104.1 (RACS J0320−35 for short) with several radio observatories, including the Giant Metrewave Radio Telescope, the Australia Telescope Compact Array, and the Australian Large Baseline Array. Combining this data with publicly available observations, they find that the source is “radio-loud,” or bright at very long wavelengths. Typically, this kind of emission is expected to be generated by powerful jets that are ejected from the poles of a quasar. For example, the authors compare this radio-loud quasar to similar sources, which show significant variability in the X-ray part of the spectrum. This is a tell-tale sign that the X-ray emission is also generated by these jets (which might come out in fits and spurts and thus cause fluctuations in brightness over time).
However, when the authors examine X-ray data of RACS J0320−35 taken by the Chandra X-ray Observatory, they find surprising results. The quasar is extremely luminous in X-rays, making it one of the brightest in the early universe. But despite the fact that it pumps out a huge number of these energetic photons, it seems to preferentially emit only the lower-energy band of X-rays and completely lacks the highest-energy emission that characterizes similar sources. In technical terms, the X-ray spectrum of RACS J0320−35 is incredibly “soft.” Moreover, this X-ray emission seems to be constant on the timescale of months, though further observations will be required to test if it varies on longer timescales. Still, the softness of the spectrum and weak variability of this system mean that its X-ray emission is unlikely to be produced by a jet.
The authors carefully consider a particular variety of jet — one that is sharply angled towards us. Since quasar jets often travel at incredible speeds, the special theory of relativity kicks in and causes strange behaviors. In particular, an effect called relativistic beaming can cause a source to appear much brighter if traveling towards the observer at extremely high speeds. However, they find that although relativistic beaming can explain the mysterious X-ray properties of RACS J0320−35, such a scenario is incompatible with its observed radio emission. Moreover, a lack of gamma-ray emission and weak variability are further pieces of evidence against the jet origin of the X-ray emission.
The article presents one more fascinating possibility for the origin of the X-rays in this source. Some theoretical work and simulations show that if a black hole breaks the Eddington limit and starts accreting matter at “super-Eddington rates,” the X-ray spectrum that results can be incredibly soft. The authors find excellent agreement between the observations and the predictions from a particular model that simulates a very slowly spinning black hole (see Figure 1). This scenario seems to be a promising explanation for the X-ray emission in RACS J0320−35, which is extremely exciting for several reasons.
Figure 1: A plot showing the observed energy spectrum of RACS J0320−35 and the theoretical spectra predicted by several models. In particular, the green circles (visible light and ultraviolet (UV) emission), blue diamonds (X-ray emission), and red squares (radio emission) represent the real observations. The shaded pink region represents the predictions of a model that simulates a black hole spinning very slowly and accreting at super-Eddington rates. The model seems to match the observed X-ray and visible/UV emission excellently. However, explaining the observed radio emission might require conditions that violate the assumptions behind this scenario. [Adapted from Ighina et al. 2025]
Despite the promising initial results of this model, there are a few caveats to the results presented in today’s article. For example, the radio jets observed from this source require a rapidly spinning black hole, which conflicts with the model assumptions. The authors note that a radio jet can be very far from a black hole, tracing its past activity. In fact, this jet may have actually spun down the central supermassive black hole by extracting energy from it, a fascinating possibility that will require both further observations and simulations to explore. Today’s bite shines a brilliant light on this possibility by analyzing RACS J0320−35, a fascinating quasar in the early universe and a stunning example that cosmic limits are meant to be broken.
Original astrobite edited by Veronika Dornan.
About the author, Ansh Gupta:
I’m an astronomy graduate student at the University of Texas at Austin working with Steven Finkelstein. I use data from JWST to study the formation and growth of the first galaxies and black holes in the universe. In my spare time, I enjoy playing piano, reading, and making YouTube videos.
The post The Winner of the Cosmic Speed-Eating Contest appeared first on AAS Nova.
Emitting powerful radiation into their surroundings, quasars had the ability to significantly influence their local environments. A recent study using JWST observations focuses in on one of the most powerful known quasars to determine its intergalactic impact.
Beacons of light from the very distant universe, quasars are incredibly luminous galactic cores powered by active supermassive black holes. During the first few billion years after the Big Bang, quasars pumped radiation not only into their host galaxies but also out into intergalactic space and subsequently into nearby galaxies. This radiation was strong enough to ionize any intervening material and even break up (or photodissociate) molecular hydrogen gas. With their star formation fuel evaporated, a quasar’s unsuspecting galactic neighbors were stymied from growth.
Sky map showing the location of quasar J0100+2802 (marked with black cross) and the [OIII]-emitting galaxies detected in the field. The red points are within the same redshift window as J0100+2802, and the green and orange points show foreground and background galaxies respectively. Click to enlarge. [Zhu et al 2025]
To investigate how quasars may impact their environments, Yongda Zhu (University of Arizona) and collaborators set their gazes on J0100+2802 — the most ultraviolet-luminous quasar known at redshift z > 6. This powerful quasar lies in an overdensity, surrounded by galaxies filled with hot, young stars, making it an ideal candidate to test the impacts of luminous quasars on their neighbors. The authors used spectroscopy and photometry obtained from JWST to explore the space around J0100+2802.
Searching within the expected reach of the quasar’s radiation field, the authors identified galaxies with doubly ionized oxygen emission ([OIII] λ5008), which traces a galaxy’s recent star formation activity. After carefully separating background and foreground galaxies from galaxies at the same redshift as J0100+2802, the authors measured the total [OIII] emission and compared it to the overall ultraviolet stellar emission. From their sample, galaxies closer to J0100+2802 tend to exhibit lower [OIII]/UV ratios than those farther away, indicating that the powerful quasar may be suppressing star formation activity in nearby galaxies.
![[OIII]/UV versus distance from quasar](https://aasnova.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/12/ZhuTrend.png)
[OIII]/UV ratio versus distance from quasar J0100+2802. There is a clear positive correlation indicating that closer to the powerful quasar, [OIII] emission declines. The dashed line shows the expected radiation field of J0100+2802. Click to enlarge. [Modified from Zhu et al 2025]
To verify that the quasar is truly responsible for this declining trend, other environmental factors and intrinsic galaxy properties must be ruled out. Could the galaxies nearby J0100+2802 just happen to have elevated ultraviolet stellar continuum? Or could the overdense environment itself drive this trend? The authors performed additional analysis to control for these variables and found no strong global factors that could explain the decline in [OIII] emission — radiation from the quasar is likely the driver.
To further bolster their results and determine whether this behavior is more widespread, the authors investigated the environments around three other quasars at the same redshift as J0100+2802. Though these quasars are not as powerful as J0100+2802, a similar trend is uncovered for galaxies within the radiation field of these quasars. From this study, radiative feedback from quasars appears to disrupt the star formation activity in nearby galaxies, suppressing their growth and changing the way early galaxy formation progresses.
Further wide-field studies are necessary to understand the full extent to which reionization-era quasars can impact their environments, but this study provides a clear path forward with JWST.
“Quasar Radiative Feedback May Suppress Growth on Intergalactic Scales at z = 6.3,” Yongda Zhu et al 2025 ApJL 995 L5. doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ae1f8e
The post Intergalactic Impacts of Quasars During the Epoch of Reionization appeared first on AAS Nova.
Editor’s Note: Astrobites is a graduate-student-run organization that digests astrophysical literature for undergraduate students. As part of the partnership between the AAS and astrobites, we occasionally repost astrobites content here at AAS Nova. We hope you enjoy this post from astrobites; the original can be viewed at astrobites.org.
Title: Quasar Lifetime Measurements from Extended Lyα Nebulae at z∼6
Authors: Dominika Ďurovčíková et al.
First Author’s Institution: MIT Kavli Institute for Astrophysics and Space Research
Status: Published in ApJ
Observations have shown that galaxies, from our own Milky Way to far out into the distant universe, often host supermassive black holes at their centres. While the exact growth history of supermassive black holes is still uncertain, astronomers think that they likely begin as much less massive black holes, which grow primarily by eating up gas in a process known as accretion. As gas falls into the black hole, it releases a huge amount of energy, allowing astronomers to observe accreting black holes even when they’re billions of light-years away from us. The most luminous accreting supermassive black holes are known as quasars.
A supermassive black hole pulls gas in towards itself due to the force of gravity, but light emitted by the gas simultaneously exerts an outward pressure known as radiation pressure. The faster gas is being pulled into the black hole, the more light is emitted by the gas, and the stronger the pressure becomes. Eventually, the pressure will win out over gravity, preventing the black hole from accreting more gas. The theoretical maximum rate at which a black hole could accrete gas, without the gas being blown out by radiation pressure, is known as the Eddington rate.
If you took a black hole that initially weighed about 100 times the mass of our Sun and consistently fed it at the Eddington rate, it would take about 1 billion years to grow to the size of a supermassive black hole. However, measurements of quasar lifetimes suggest that black holes don’t continuously accrete at the Eddington rate, and instead, black holes go through phases of accretion. As a result, we should not expect to find supermassive black holes within the first billion years of the universe’s history.
But the universe loves to throw astronomers curveballs. Indeed, we have observed quasars less than 1 billion years after the Big Bang, suggesting that this simple picture of supermassive black hole growth is not quite right. Many mechanisms have been proposed as ways to speed up black hole growth, including accretion rates higher than the Eddington rate, mergers between two black holes, and phases of obscured growth during which the black hole accretes at the Eddington rate, but most of the light released in this process is hidden from view.
Today’s authors tackle the question of whether black holes have substantial phases of obscured growth by measuring the lifetimes of early universe quasars. Previous measurements have suggested that these quasars have only been active for less than 1 million years. However, the method that was previously used could be underestimating quasar lifetimes if there was a period of obscured growth. To determine whether this is the case, today’s authors use a different, independent method of measuring the quasar’s lifetime; if there’s a significant mismatch between the two age estimates, then it’s likely that the quasar has had significant periods of obscured growth.
The key to the methods used by today’s authors is that they probe different lines of sight to the quasar. Previous methods quantified the effect of a quasar’s light on the intergalactic medium (the diffuse gas in between galaxies) along the line of sight from the quasar to us. The method used in today’s article measures the size of a nebula of ionised gas, in the plane of the sky, at a right angle to the line of sight. While light from the quasar may have been obscured along our line of sight, it’s unlikely to have also been obscured at a different angle at the exact same time.
A quasar emits a lot of photons capable of ionising hydrogen, and as a result, a quasar can carve out bubbles of ionised gas in the otherwise neutral circumgalactic medium. The size of the ionised gas bubble, or nebula, grows at the speed of light, so if you know the size of the nebula, you can estimate the time since quasar activity began. Today’s authors looked for ionised gas in the circumgalactic medium of six early universe quasars, all of which are estimated to have very short lifetimes based on line-of-sight measurements.
To observe ionised nebulae in the circumgalactic medium, today’s authors use observations from the Very Large Telescope’s Multi-Unit Spectroscopic Explorer (MUSE). The first three panels of Figure 1 show you (left to right) the quasar; the point-spread function (PSF), or a model of how the quasar’s light diffracts as it’s observed by MUSE; and the image of the region surrounding the quasar once you subtract the PSF from the image. Each pixel is colour-coded by brightness. The last two panels also show the PSF-subtracted image, but are instead colour-coded by the ratio of signal to noise in each pixel. In the last panel, the signal has been smoothed out, and you can see the structure of a nebula (outlined in red) emerge from the image.
Figure 1: To observe the nebula (red outlined region in the rightmost panel), you have to subtract out the light coming from the quasar (leftmost panel). [Adapted from Ďurovčíková et al. 2025]
Figure 2: The age estimates derived by today’s authors (y-axis) are similar to the line-of-sight age estimates (x-axis), and generally follow a one-to-one relationship, suggesting that line-of-sight obscuration effects are not leading astronomers to underestimate the age of a quasar. [Adapted from Ďurovčíková et al. 2025]
Age estimates from the two methods are broadly pretty consistent, suggesting that obscuration effects are not causing one method to be severely underestimating the lifetime of a quasar. Therefore, for these six quasars, it seems unlikely that their growth can be primarily explained by phases of obscured growth. Instead, some other mechanism must have allowed these black holes to grow rapidly during the early universe and reach their supermassive sizes.
The mystery of how supermassive black holes can grow so quickly is still to be solved, but today’s article shows us that we haven’t been missing phases of obscured growth. The results of today’s article provide an independent measurement of quasar lifetimes, which models of supermassive black hole growth should be able to explain.
Original astrobite edited by Cesily King.
About the author, Nathalie Korhonen Cuestas:
Nathalie Korhonen Cuestas is a second-year PhD student at Northwestern University, where her research focuses on the chemical evolution of galaxies.
The post Are Quasars Growing in Secret? appeared first on AAS Nova.
Editor’s Note: Astrobites is a graduate-student-run organization that digests astrophysical literature for undergraduate students. As part of the partnership between the AAS and astrobites, we occasionally repost astrobites content here at AAS Nova. We hope you enjoy this post from astrobites; the original can be viewed at astrobites.org.
Title: VODKA-JWST: Synchronized Growth of Two Supermassive Black Holes in a Massive Gas Disk? A 3.8 kpc Separation Dual Quasar at Cosmic Noon with the NIRSpec Integral Field Unit
Authors: Yuzo Ishikawa et al.
First Author’s Institution: Johns Hopkins University and MIT Kavli Institute for Astrophysics and Space Research
Status: Published in ApJ
Figure 1: A map of the flux detected around the Hɑ and [NII] lines in the J0749+2255 system. The two quasars are found in the central region, denoted with “NE” and “SW.” [Adapted from Ishikawa et al. 2025]
Figure 2 shows the spectra for the SW and NE quasars, and the first thing that is impossible to ignore is just how similar they are. There are some small differences; for example, the NE quasar is slightly redder than the SW quasar, and some emission lines have different shapes and are a smidge offset from one another. But the general similarity brings up the possibility that what we’re looking at isn’t two separate quasars, but rather one object that’s being gravitationally lensed! The small differences in the spectra could be consistent with a lensing scenario, as they could be explained by time delays in the lensing or foreground contamination. A major problem with this idea, however, is that no observations of this system have provided evidence for a lens: we have not seen the massive foreground object that would actually be causing the gravitational lensing. While it’s possible that the lens is just incredibly faint, there’s no smoking gun for lensing happening here.
Figure 2: Spectral observations of the two quasars, vertically offset for clarity. The blue and red curves represent JWST observations, with the gray lines representing observations from previous works with other telescopes. The JWST results shown here demonstrate the remarkable similarity between the two quasars. [Adapted from Ishikawa et al. 2025]
The story becomes even more complicated when you look beyond the quasars, as JWST observations also detected diffuse emission from gas as shown in Figure 3. This gas is at the same redshift as the quasars, and can thus be associated with their host galaxy. And crucially, this gas doesn’t show any signs of lensing, such as the distinct arcs or symmetry you find in other lensed systems. This, coupled with the differences in the quasar spectra, suggests that this is not a lensed system, and that in fact we are looking at two different quasars.
Figure 3: Maps of Hɑ emission with the quasar contributions removed. Left panel shows the flux, middle shows the velocity dispersion, and right the radial velocity. The radial velocity measurements provide strong evidence for a disk with gas rotation and relatively little disturbance, which is not usually the case for merger environments. [Ishikawa et al. 2025]
However, this story is complicated by the dynamics within the gas surrounding the quasars. As shown in the rightmost panel of Figure 3, the quasars are embedded in a gas disk that’s rotating, with one half of the gas being redshifted and the other half blue shifted. The quasars aren’t separated into these two regions, but are rather both found at the center of the disk. And the gas is showing none of the kinematic disturbance we would expect during a major merger, as the disk seems to be relatively stable. So maybe we’re not witnessing a merger in progress, but rather a disk galaxy that is playing host to two quasars! Based on simulations, one way this could happen is if a major merger takes place at an earlier time, and two black holes form from the resulting instabilities. This is another possible explanation for why the quasars are so similar.
Overall, this work points to the complicated nature of dual quasar systems. Is this one quasar being lensed or two different quasars? If they are distinct objects, are we witnessing a merger of galaxies, or did they both form in one galaxy? Future observations may be the key to answering these questions, but for now it remains a very interesting system.
Original astrobite edited by Hillary Andales.
About the author, Skylar Grayson:
Skylar Grayson is an astrophysics PhD candidate and NSF Graduate Research Fellow at Arizona State University. Her primary research focuses on active galactic nucleus feedback processes in cosmological simulations. She also works in astronomy education research, studying online learners in both undergraduate and free-choice environments. In her free time, Skylar keeps herself busy doing science communication on social media, playing drums and guitar, and crocheting!
The post Duel of the Dual: The Mystery of a Quasar Pair appeared first on AAS Nova.
A distant quasar has revealed one of the most extreme ultraviolet outflows ever observed, providing new clues about the powerful interactions between supermassive black holes and their host galaxies. A supermassive black hole more than a billion times the mass of the Sun is blasting gas through space at such extraordinary speeds that astronomers are [...]
Login