SpaceX launched the latest batch of spy satellites for the U.S. government early Friday morning (June 19).
A Falcon 9 rocket lifted off from California's Vandenberg Space Force Base on Friday, at 4:50 a.m. EDT (0850 GMT; 1:50 a.m. local California time).
The launch kicked off a mission for the U.S. National Reconnaissance Office (NRO) called NROL-179.
SpaceX launched the NROL-179 mission for the U.S. government early Friday morning (June 19) from Vandenberg Space Force Base in California. (Image credit: SpaceX)
The NRO operates the United States' fleet of spy satellites. NROL-179 was the 14th mission dedicated to building out a new part of that fleet β a network the NRO calls its "proliferated architecture."
"To stay ahead of the competition and ensure it can continue to operate in a heightened threat environment, the NRO is modernizing its architecture in space and on the ground β delivering more capability faster with increased resilience," agency officials wrote in the NROL-179 press kit.
"A greater number of satellites β large and small, government and commercial, in multiple orbits β will deliver an order of magnitude more signals and images than is available today," they added.
SpaceX and Northrop Grumman build the "proliferated architecture" satellites. Information about the spacecraft is hard to come by; the NRO has not released details about their activities or orbits.
All of these satellites have reached orbit atop Falcon 9s flying out of Vandenberg, on California's central coast, with the first such mission launching in May 2024.
To plan, the Falcon 9's first stage returned to Earth a little less than eight minutes after liftoff on Friday, touching down at Vandenberg's Landing Zone 4. It was the third flight for this particular booster, according to a SpaceX mission description.
NROL-179 was the 71st Falcon 9 mission of 2026. Fifty-seven of the rocket's launches this year to date have been devoted to building out SpaceX's Starlink broadband megaconstellation in low Earth orbit.
Editor's note: This story was updated on June 19 with news of successful launch.
Russian cosmonaut Aleksandr Samokutyaev, who served twice as a crew member aboard the International Space Station (ISS), including during the final US space shuttle mission in 2011, has died at the age of 56.
With Samokutyaev's death on Wednesday, he becomes the first former ISS long-duration resident to die in the 26 years that the space station has been a home to 155 other cosmonauts and astronauts as expedition crew members. The cause of his death is unknown.
Portrait of cosmonaut Aleksandr Samokutyaev.
Credit:
Roscosmos
"The leadership and staff of the Roscosmos State Corporation extend their sincere condolences to the family and loved ones of Aleksandr Mikhailovich," officials with Russia's space agency said in a statement.
Russian cosmonaut Aleksandr Samokutyaev, who served twice as a crew member aboard the International Space Station (ISS), including during the final US space shuttle mission in 2011, has died at the age of 56.
With Samokutyaev's death on Wednesday, he becomes the first former ISS long-duration resident to die in the 26 years that the space station has been a home to 155 other cosmonauts and astronauts as expedition crew members. The cause of his death is unknown.
Portrait of cosmonaut Aleksandr Samokutyaev.
Credit:
Roscosmos
"The leadership and staff of the Roscosmos State Corporation extend their sincere condolences to the family and loved ones of Aleksandr Mikhailovich," officials with Russia's space agency said in a statement.
NASAβs Curiosity rover and its mission to investigate whether Mars could have ever supported microbial life have taken one step closer to achieving its goal, with one of the most significant discoveries in the ongoing search for evidence of life on the Red Planet.
While exploring Gale Crater, NASAβs robotic rover uncovered a sample in 2020 and, using a chemical technique, determined that 21 carbon-based molecules were preserved in the clay-rich sedimentary rock. This also included seven that had never been identified on Mars before.Β
While the discovery does not definitively point to life on the Red Planet, it does strengthen the case that Mars has the chemical conditions to support life.Β
According to scientists, the most remarkable aspect of the discovery is not the molecules themselves, but their preservation
βThe actual organic components they found are not strong evidence for life,β said Texas A&M University astrobiologist and geobiologist Dr. Michael Tice in a statement. Tice acknowledged that these compounds may also have evolved through abiotic processes, including formation in meteorites or other non-biological pathways.
βThese organics were likely preserved in the rocks for a very long time, possibly billions of years, despite radiation and other harsh conditions on Mars,β Tice said.
βIt blows my mind.β
Building Blocks of Life
Organic molecules are critical building blocks of life, but they can also form through non-biological processes, such as geological reactions or meteorite delivery. Similar preserved compounds on Earth help scientists study ancient environments, and their discovery on Mars provides new clues about the planetβs billion-year-old history.
βStudying how those compounds vary between different rocks can tell a story of how life and environments changed,β Tice recently said in a statement issued by Texas A&M. βFinding organics stored in similar ways on Mars tells us that there could be similar stories preserved there as well.β
The findings also suggest that Martian rocks may contain evidence from a time before life began, a record of sorts that Earthβs past geology has mostly erased.
βIt is even possible that some Mars rocks will tell us about times when there was no life there,β he said, with organics formed instead through prebiotic chemistry or delivered from space. βWe do not have an equivalent record of such a time preserved on Earth.β
The findings build on earlier research by Tice and his team that identified possible biosignatures in Mars rocks studied by NASAβs Perseverance rover.Β
Tice suggests, βWhen we looked even closer, we saw things that are easy to explain with early Martian life but very difficult to explain with only geological processes.β
The rocks contained organic carbon and key elements connected to microbial energy sources, along with chemical patterns that may show redox reactions (processes often associated with life on Earth).
βWith the right collection, we could find the next step in evidence for past life on Mars or learn about the kinds of processes that eventually led to life on our planet.β
Tice and his colleagues will continue their work exploring the Martian land.Β
βIβm continuing to study the record of early Martian evolution as part of the PIXL instrument team on the Perseverance rover,β he said.
βIn addition, Iβm comparing how organisms affected some of the oldest sediments on Earth β now preserved in rocks in South Africaβwith the potential biosignatures we discovered on Mars.β
Using NASAβs Goldstone Solar System Radar and NSFβs Green Bank Telescope, astronomers from the University of California, Los Angeles, confirmed that the icy surface of Jupiterβs moon Europa scatters radio energy in an unusually strong and complex way not seen on rocky worlds.
A Chinese spacecraft has arrived at one of Earth's temporary "quasi-moons" and will soon attempt to land on the space rock to scoop up samples that will be returned to our planet next year. The ambitious mission could help researchers uncover secrets about Earth's main moon and provide clues that may benefit space exploration and planetary defense, experts say.
The mission's primary target is 469219 Kamo'oalewa β also known as 2016 HO3 or simply Kamo'oalewa β a near-Earth asteroid discovered in 2016 by astronomers at Hawaii's Haleakala Observatory. It likely spans somewhere between 130 and 330 feet (40 to 100 meters) across and is a "quasi-satellite" of our planet, meaning it's orbiting the sun right alongside Earth in a temporary partnership. (Kamo'oalewa means "oscillating celestial fragment" in Hawaiian.)
Tianwen-2 is predicted to have arrived at Kamo'oalewa on June 7 and inserted itself into an orbit alongside the asteroid, according to an unverified timeline shared by freelance journalist Andrew Jones, a leading expert on China's space program. Around a month later, on July 4, the probe is expected to descend upon the space rock to collect samples from its surface, potentially employing a never-before-seen drilling technique to do so. (The CNSA has not released an official timeline for the mission or shared any recent updates about its progress.)
If successful, the samples are expected to be returned to Earth on Nov. 29, 2027, according to the same timeline. At this point, Tianwen-2 will then slingshot around our planet and head farther out into the solar system for its secondary mission: to rendezvous with and study 311P/PanSTARRS β a peculiar object beyond Mars, which displays characteristics of both comets and asteroids β in 2035.
This photo of one of Tianwen-2's decagonal solar panels, captured in orbit, was the first image of the probe released by the CNSA. (Image credit: CNSA)
Samples from Kamo'oalewa could help answer many interesting questions, including the true origin of the object, which some experts believe may have broken off from the moon.
"What makes [this mission] extraordinary is that we don't yet know [the object's] composition or origin," Li Chunlai, a researcher with the Chinese Academy of Sciences' National Astronomical Observatories and chief commander of Tianwen-2's ground application system, said in a state-sanctioned video translated to English. "We'll only obtain definitive answers after completing our exploration."
What is Kamo'oalewa?
There are currently eight known quasi-moons orbiting the sun alongside Earth, following the most recent quasi-moon discovery in September 2025. Unlike the similarly named "minimoons," which are asteroids that are briefly captured by Earth's gravity for a few months or years at a time, quasi-moons are temporary satellites that slowly circle our planet but are never gravitationally bound to it.
This relationship can last decades, or even centuries. For example, experts think Kamo'oalewa has been accompanying our planet for at least 100 years and could remain alongside it for another 300 years before it starts to fall out of sync with our solar orbit.
On June 7, when Tianwen-2 was expected to arrive at Kamo'oalewa, the space rock was around 24.2 million miles (39.1 million km) from Earth. (Image credit: NASA/JPL/Small-Body Database Lookup)
"The way Kamo'oalewa moves with Earth is kind of like a dog that might tag along with you for a while on a long walk through the woods, but it's not your dog," Richard Binzel, a planetary scientist and asteroid expert at MIT, told Live Science in an email.
The Ferris-wheel-size space rock is one of the closest quasi-moons to us, with a minimum distance of around 2.9 million miles (4.6 million kilometers) from Earth, or around 12 times farther away than our actual moon. It is also one of the fastest-spinning quasi-moons, rotating around its axis every 30 minutes. But unlike other quasi-moons, which likely originate from the solar system's main asteroid belt, between Mars and Jupiter, our current best guess is that Kamo'oalewa is actually a piece of the moon.
This hypothesis is based on observations from 2021 that showed Kamo'oalewa absorbs and reflects light similarly to the moon, hinting that the space rock may be a chunk of lunar material ejected by a long-ago meteor strike. More recently, in 2024, researchers narrowed down the most likely impact crater from which the asteroid originated: the 13.6-mile-wide (22 km) Giordano Bruno crater, located on the far side of the moon. However, there is still a chance that Kamo'oalewa is a main-belt asteroid that just happens to look an awful lot like lunar material.
Kamo'oalewa (a.k.a. 2016 HO3) circles Earth but does not orbit our planet. This simulation shows its predicted movements relative to Earth over the next few centuries. (Image credit: NASA/Pheonix7777/Wikimedia)
"I am curious to find out the answer about its origin, since the debate on its [potential] lunar origin is still very open," Marco Fenucci, a mathematician at the European Space Agency's Near-Earth Objects Coordination Centre who has co-authored multiple studies on Kamo'oalewa, told Live Science. This mission should "definitely give us an answer to this matter," he added.
Scientists are also unsure whether Kamo'oalewa is a "solid monolithic rock," like the $100,000 quadrillion asteroid Psyche (the target of NASA's ongoing Psyche mission), or a "rubble-pile-like asteroid," such as Bennu or Ryugu, both of which have been explored by sample-return missions in recent years, Fenucci said.
Scooping up samples
Having arrived at Kamo'oalewa, Tianwen-2 will spend the next few weeks mapping the asteroid's surface at altitudes between 1,000 feet and 12.5 miles (300 m to 20 km) above its surface, according to limited mission details revealed by Chinese scientists in a January study. The resulting map will allow researchers to estimate the asteroid's density and work out the best landing spot.
On July 4, the probe is expected to swoop down and scoop up around 3.5 ounces (100 grams) of surface material, or regolith, from the asteroid, which is slightly less than what NASA's OSIRIS-REx mission managed to grab from Bennu. However, there are multiple ways this sampling process could play out.
If the asteroid is a pile of rubble, the probe will utilize a touch-and-go approach, which involves hovering just above the surface and using a robotic arm to reach out and grab the sample. This method was also used by OSIRIS-REx for Bennu and by Japan's Hayabusa2 mission, which scooped up samples from Ryugu.
But if Kamo'oalewa has a more solid surface, Tianwen-2 will attempt to land directly on the space rock and anchor itself in place before drilling into the asteroid. This has never been attempted before and could allow for longer contact time and "more controlled sampling," according to The Planetary Society.
Tianwen-2 will circle Kamo'oalewa at various altitudes in order to scan the space rock and figure out its best possible landing spot. (Image credit: Zhang et al. 2026)
After collecting samples, the probe will remain alongside the asteroid and conduct further analysis of its size, shape and trajectory.
In late April 2027, Tianwen-2 will depart Kamo'oalewa and begin the six-month journey back to Earth, where it will dump its samples in a return capsule that will fall to our planet's surface as the probe begins its long journey to rendezvous with 311P/PanSTARRS.
The return capsule will reenter Earth's atmosphere at around 27,000 mph (43,500 km/h), researchers wrote in the January study. That's slightly faster than the Orion capsule carrying the Artemis II astronauts traveled as it fell back to Earth in April.
What could we learn from Tianwen-2?
In addition to ending the debate over Kamo'oalewa's origin, samples from Tianwen-2 could reveal more about the solar system and our place within it.
For example, previously returned asteroid samples have helped to "tell us where Earth's water came from, how complex organic molecules were distributed in the early solar system, and how surface processes like space weathering alter asteroid properties over time," Fenucci said. These samples can also be used to "establish a link to known meteorites found on Earth" and help us learn more about these space rocks, he added.
Tianwen-2 launched into space May 28 on board one of China's Long March 3B rockets. (Image credit: VCG/VCG via Getty Images)
The proximity of quasi-moons and minimoons to Earth also makes them valuable assets for future space exploration missions. Some researchers have proposed using them as temporary bases or refueling stations that could serve as stops on the way to Mars or other faraway destinations. These objects "could become literal stepping stones for human missions to practice what it is like to leave the Earth-moon cradle," Binzel said.
One particular idea that scientists want to explore is whether water can be extracted from these objects. And if Kamo'oalewa is a piece of the moon, that could have implications for NASA's planned moon base. "Someday, it might be possible to extract that water to provide resources for thirsty astronauts or even generate usable rocket fuel from the hydrogen," Binzel said.
"Over the time scale of centuries, these kinds of objects have a chance of striking the Earth," said Binzel, who invented the Torino scale used to measure the impact potential of near-Earth objects. Therefore, a better understanding of space rocks like Kamo'oalewa "can prepare us in how to deal with a threatening object if one were ever discovered," he added.
One of the United States' most storied space launch sites has been cleared of its decades-old support towers, making way for modern rockets to use the pad. Space Launch Complex-6 (SLC-6) at Vandenberg Space Force Station is arguably better known for what did not lift off from there than for what did.
A series of demolition charges on Tuesday (June 16) brought down the access tower, mobile service tower, and what remained of the assembly building at SLC-6βpronounced "slick-six"βin Southern California. Once the location for the US Air Force's first effort to put humans into space and later, the West Coast launch site for the space shuttle, SLC-6 will next be used by SpaceX in support of Falcon 9 and Falcon Heavy missions.
Vandenberg Space Force Base personnel watch as the assembly building at Space Launch Complex-6 (SLC-6) is toppled on June 16, 2026, to make way for SpaceX's use of the site.
Credit:
Space Launch Delta 30/Tech. Sgt. Draeke Layman
"Space Launch Complex-6 represents six decades of American innovation and our unwavering commitment to securing space superiority," Col. James T. Horne III, commander of Space Launch Delta 30 at Vandenberg, said in a statement. "By modernizing this historic footprint in partnership with our defense industrial base, we are building directly upon the foundation of our pioneers."
One of the United States' most storied space launch sites has been cleared of its decades-old support towers, making way for modern rockets to use the pad. Space Launch Complex-6 (SLC-6) at Vandenberg Space Force Station is arguably better known for what did not lift off from there than for what did.
A series of demolition charges on Tuesday (June 16) brought down the access tower, mobile service tower, and what remained of the assembly building at SLC-6βpronounced "slick-six"βin Southern California. Once the location for the US Air Force's first effort to put humans into space and later, the West Coast launch site for the space shuttle, SLC-6 will next be used by SpaceX in support of Falcon 9 and Falcon Heavy missions.
Vandenberg Space Force Base personnel watch as the assembly building at Space Launch Complex-6 (SLC-6) is toppled on June 16, 2026, to make way for SpaceX's use of the site.
Credit:
Space Launch Delta 30/Tech. Sgt. Draeke Layman
"Space Launch Complex-6 represents six decades of American innovation and our unwavering commitment to securing space superiority," Col. James T. Horne III, commander of Space Launch Delta 30 at Vandenberg, said in a statement. "By modernizing this historic footprint in partnership with our defense industrial base, we are building directly upon the foundation of our pioneers."
In the relentless quest to uncover signs of life beyond Earth, scientists have turned their gaze towards the mysterious realms of ocean worldsβicy moons like Enceladus, Europa, and Titan. These celestial bodies harbor vast, hidden oceans beneath their frozen crusts, creating environments that could potentially support life. Yet, the challenge remains daunting: distinguishing genuine biological signatures from complex abiotic processes that could mimic these signals. A groundbreaking study recently published in Nature Astronomy proposes a sophisticated quantitative framework designed to rigorously evaluate these abiotic baselines on ocean worlds, shedding new light on how future life detection missions might navigate this delicate terrain.
Ocean worlds have captivated astrobiologists not merely because they contain liquid water, a fundamental criterion for habitability, but also because they offer diverse chemical environments where life as we know it might exist. However, confirming the presence of life requires more than spotting chemicals commonly associated with biology; it demands a nuanced understanding of how non-biological processes could generate similar signals, muddying the interpretative waters. The novel framework developed by Higgins, Chen, Warr, and colleagues provides an unprecedented approach to dissect this ambiguity, employing Enceladus as a primary example to demonstrate its utility.
At the heart of the study lies the challenge of interpreting isotopic measurements, particularly of methane (CHβ) and carbon dioxide (COβ), molecules widely regarded as potential biosignatures due to their roles in Earthβs carbon cycle. The study scrutinizes the isotopic ratios of these molecules, expressed as δ¹³C values, which reflect the ratio of carbon-13 to carbon-12 isotopes. Traditionally, biological processes tend to prefer lighter isotopes, leading to distinctive fractionation patterns. However, the researchers highlight that uncertainties inherent in abiotic chemistry within Enceladusβ ocean and vent systems can produce isotopic signatures overlapping with those produced by biological activity, thereby defying straightforward interpretation.
The implication is profound: future missions that might measure δ¹³C in carbon-bearing molecules emanating from Enceladusβ plumes could misinterpret data, either falsely declaring a biosignature or overlooking subtle hints of life concealed beneath abiotic noise. The framework thus urges caution against over-reliance on isotopic biosignatures without a comprehensive assessment of the abiotic baseline. This is a pivotal insight that recalibrates how missions might prioritize scientific instruments and analytical strategies aboard orbiters or landers.
Complementing isotopic analysis, the study explores amino acid chirality as an alternative biosignature. Chirality, the βhandednessβ of molecules, is a hallmark of terrestrial biology, as living organisms almost exclusively synthesize left-handed amino acids. Nevertheless, the researchers caution that abiotic synthesis of amino acids on ocean worlds, influenced by factors such as radiation, mineral surfaces, and catalytic processes, could yield racemic mixtures or even chiral excesses unrelated to life. This ambiguity necessitates robust characterization of abiotic organic chemistry before interpreting chirality as a definitive biosignature in extraterrestrial contexts.
Another layer of complexity arises from the physical and geological attributes of the ocean worlds themselves. The study emphasizes that factors like internal temperature gradients, rheology (the deformation behavior of the icy shell and underlying materials), and lithology (rock types beneath the ocean) significantly influence abiotic chemical pathways. Understanding these properties with finer precision could narrow the range of isotopic and chemical signatures attributable to non-biological processes, thereby enhancing the confidence in detecting life.
Central to reducing the abiotic baseline uncertainty is the challenge of constraining the internal temperatures of ocean worlds. The framework points out that if internal temperatures can be pinpointed within a range of about 10 to 100 degrees Celsius, models of abiotic chemistry become markedly more predictive. Doing so would help delineate which molecular signals likely stem from hydrothermal activity and mineral interactions rather than biogenic outputs. This underscores the vital role of geophysical observations, such as gravity mapping, heat flux measurements, and ice shell thickness determinations, in complementing chemical analyses.
Transport timescales within the ocean and the overlying ice shell also feature as critical parameters. The timeframe over which molecules or small organic compounds travel from the ocean floor to the surface can alter their chemical and isotopic signatures dramatically. For instance, longer transport times may lead to isotopic exchanges or degradation processes that obscure the original biosignature signal. Hence, understanding ocean circulation patterns and ice shell permeability is integral to accurately interpreting any detected anomaly.
Expanding beyond Enceladus, the frameworkβs holistic approach is applicable to other ocean worlds such as Europa and Titan, each with their distinct environments and chemical contexts. On Europa, for example, the oceanβs interaction with a silicate seafloor and potential radiolysis-driven chemistry creates a different abiotic baseline compared to Enceladus. Titanβs complex organic-rich atmosphere and potential subsurface oceans add further layers of chemical diversity. The framework enables tailoring of life detection strategies and biosignature interpretations to these distinct habitats.
The studyβs methodology can also inform future mission design, influencing instrument selection, sampling strategies, and data interpretation pipelines. By anticipating where abiotic ambiguity is most pronounced, mission planners can prioritize measurements that either better constrain abiotic baselines or provide multiple independent biosignature lines of evidence. This may include coupling isotopic data with mineralogical, geophysical, and molecular chirality information to build a more integrated and less ambiguous picture of habitability.
Furthermore, the framework embodies a precautionary principle against false positives and false negatives. Past and ongoing searches for life beyond Earth have grappled with ambiguous signals, from Vikingβs methyl chloride controversy on Mars to debates over methane on the Red Planet. The ocean worldsβ complex chemistry and challenging environments elevate this problem, making a rigorous, quantitative approach like that offered by Higgins et al. indispensable in the life detection toolkit.
Importantly, this work illustrates the multidisciplinarity essential in astrobiology. Geochemistry, planetary science, biology, and physics converge to piece together the puzzle of extraterrestrial biosignatures. The frameworkβs integrated perspective exemplifies the collaborative spirit needed to interpret subtle clues from distant worlds and avoid the pitfalls of isolated or oversimplified analyses.
Looking ahead, technological advancements in both remote sensing and in situ exploration promise to enhance constraints on ocean world environments, thereby sharpening the frameworkβs applicability. For instance, sophisticated flyby missions or landers equipped with mass spectrometers, isotopic analyzers, and chiral detection capabilities may provide richer datasets. Simultaneously, laboratory simulations and terrestrial analog studies will refine models of abiotic chemistry and kinetics under relevant conditions.
The impact of this research extends beyond ocean worlds to the broader quest for life in the cosmos. The principles of robustly addressing abiotic baselines and embracing interdisciplinary data fusion can guide biosignature evaluation on exoplanets and other planetary bodies where lifeβs chemical fingerprints, if present, might be similarly elusive or confounded by non-biological processes.
In conclusion, the study spearheaded by Higgins and colleagues fundamentally reshapes our approach to biosignature interpretation on ocean worlds. By proposing a quantitative, comprehensive framework that weighs biosignature potential against carefully characterized abiotic backgrounds, it sets a new standard for rigor in the search for extraterrestrial life. As humanityβs exploration of the Solar Systemβs ocean realms advances, this framework will be pivotal in ensuring that claims of discovering life are grounded in unambiguous, scientifically defensible evidence.
Subject of Research: Evaluation of biosignature potential versus abiotic baselines on ocean worlds in the Solar System.
Article Title: A framework for evaluating biosignature potential against the abiotic baseline on ocean worlds.
Article References:
Higgins, P.M., Chen, W., Warr, O. et al. A framework for evaluating biosignature potential against the abiotic baseline on ocean worlds. Nat Astron (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41550-026-02893-8
NASA will discuss an ambitious mission to boost the orbit of its Swift space telescope during a press conference today (June 17), and you can listen to it live.
An Ariane 6 heavy-lift rocket launched a record-breaking load to orbit early Wednesday morning (June 17), carrying a batch of Amazon Leo satellites to orbit.
At age 19, John McFall thought he might never walk again after his right leg was amputated above the knee following a motorcycle accident. Fast-forward more than two decades, and he is now on the verge of becoming the first physically disabled person in space.
McFall, 45, is a British surgeon and former Paralympic athlete who won multiple medals as a T42-class sprinter. In 2022, he joined the European Space Agency's (ESA) Fly! program, which aimed to see if a person with a physical disability could live and work in low Earth orbit. And in February 2025, he became the first member of the program to be cleared for a potential future mission to space.
More recently, on June 2, the U.K. government announced that McFall had been selected as a prospective member of the first crew to live on Haven-1, an upcoming commercial space station from U.S. company Vast that is scheduled to be the first of its kind in low Earth orbit, if it launches on time early next year.
If everything goes according to plan, the roughly 30-day mission will help answer a series of interesting questions about how living in space might be both challenging and advantageous for people with physical disabilities.
Live Science spoke with McFall about what it would mean to break new ground, wearing a prosthesis in space and how microgravity might uniquely affect him.
Harry Baker: How did it feel to get the news that you might be going to space next year?
John McFall: Awesome. Very awesome, very exciting. And it feels like we're one step closer to realizing this amazing opportunity and achieving this very exciting milestone in human space exploration.
HB: What would it mean to you personally to become the first physically disabled astronaut in space?
JM: To me personally, it doesn't make a difference. In terms of "what an achievement for me," I don't tend to think of it like that. However, I am very aware that the broader message that it sends to wider society about what people are capable of β whether they have a disability or not β is very interesting and powerful. So I'm proud to be a very small part of that movement, if you like, and the journey of making society a more tolerant and inclusive place.
McFall (far right) joined ESA in 2022. This photo shows him alongside some of his fellow Class of 2022 astronauts at an event in Paris the same year. (Image credit: JOEL SAGET / AFP via Getty Images)
HB: What advantages do you think your disability might give you in space compared with other astronauts?
JM: It's a good question because we don't actually know. We can hypothesize, but until we actually get into space and conduct some science that's specifically relevant to my disability, we won't know. But there are some theoretical benefits.
One is that when you live in microgravity, you get a shift of fluid from the lower part of your body up into the upper part of your body and your cranium. This can cause swelling of the optic disk, which can temporarily affect vision. It's called spaceflight-associated neuro-ocular syndrome (SANS), and it affects around 70-75% of astronauts. I would hypothesize that, having a reduced lower limb volume to start with, you're going to get a proportionally smaller fluid shift in microgravity, relative to your physiological capacity to process it, reducing the risk of things like SANS.
Another is that in microgravity, because you're weightless, you're not using your bones as much, and your body naturally resorbs them. So your bones get weaker and thinner. And one of the byproducts of this is that you have to excrete a lot of calcium, and you do this via peeing it out. As it [calcium] passes through your renal system, or kidneys, this causes an increased risk of kidney stones in microgravity. So again, having lower bone mass to start with β but retaining the same physiological capacity to metabolically process calcium β there is potentially a lower risk of kidney stones.
Haven-1 is scheduled to be the first ever commercial space station. It will launch in early 2027 and could host its first astronauts, including McFall, later the same year. (Image credit: ESA/Novespace)
So those are two small-but-hypothetical benefits of my particular disability in space. But the real answer is, we don't know until we do the science (i.e., urine samples, blood samples and eye examinations in orbit).
HB: How might space be more challenging for you than for other astronauts?
JM: Again, we don't know. The question is, do you really need both your lower limbs to help you stabilize and support yourself whilst your hands are doing tasks? And is having two legs useful in what we would call normal intravehicular operations [conducted inside the spacecraft], whether it be cargo operations, maintenance, this sort of stuff?
When we went through the feasibility initiative, trying to think of and work out all these scenarios, we couldn't really think of a disadvantage other than maybe having to work slightly harder.
HB: Will you be wearing a prosthesis in space?
JM: The plan is to wear a prosthesis. We deemed quite early on that wearing a prosthesis in a spacecraft would be a necessity, mainly at launch time. If there was an emergency that required me to get out of the spacecraft and get off the crew access arm and away from the launch site, it would be ideal wearing a prosthesis to do that.
But in space, we don't know whether it's going to be an advantage or be required for these intravehicular activities. Where I would definitely need to use one is on a long-duration mission where I need to exercise lots. I use a prosthesis to exercise on Earth, and I would use a prosthesis to exercise in orbit. However, short-duration missions [like this one] do not.
McFall won several medals as a T42-class sprinter, including a bronze at the the 2008 paralympic Games in Beijing. (Image credit: Andrew Wong via Getty Images)
The prosthetics I use are modular, so I wear a socket β that's what's left of my leg goes inside β and then the hardware, what we call the terminal device, is attached to the socket. What I would envisage doing is always wearing the socket, because that way, you maintain consistency. But [for] the terminal device itself, I have a quick-change adapter that you can just unplug the device, and you can take it off and, likewise, put it back in again.
It's "plug and play," if you like, and [it will allow me to] make assessments of whether it's useful or not.
HB: Will your prosthesis need to be specially made for the trip?
JM: Not really. We are certifying a number of prosthetic hardware items to fly, but they're all what we call "commercial, off-the-shelf items." So they're products that are widely available.
However, there are some very small changes that we need to make to make them compliant with the safety requirements of the space station environment and the spacecraft, such as fireproof tape around certain parts of the device or changing the hydraulic fluid so it's less toxic in case there is a leak.
We're also doing a small amount of redesigning to the shape of the foot to make it more ergonomic to interface with things like rails and straps inside the space station, because you often slip your foot under rails and straps.
HB: Could anything you learn from your mission help physically disabled people back on Earth?
JM: Yeah, I think so, certainly from a prosthetics point of view. There are prosthetic developments that we have made that will benefit other prosthetic users in the future.
I mentioned this quick-change adapter. We have revised or reengineered this particular device to perform in a certain way, which I think will have advantages for a whole range of lower-limb amputees. The socket technology βͺββ¬ the interface between my stump and the prosthesis βͺββ¬ is [also] going to be redesigned and potentially has very beneficial applications for lower-limb amputees again.
McFall was cleared to fly to space last year. Before then, he featured in the opening ceremony for the 2024 Paralympic Games in Paris (photographed). (Image credit: Mauro Ujetto/NurPhoto via Getty Images)
HB: Are you hoping to be selected for more missions in the future? And would you like to become the first physically disabled person on the International Space Station (ISS) or the moon?
JM: Yeah, absolutely. I hope that we use this opportunity to demonstrate that it is very feasible, and I hope that that would put me in line for selection of missions in the future.
I would love to, in the future, potentially spend longer in space, demonstrating that it's possible for someone with a disability to live and work in space and cope with everything that comes with that.
And absolutely, I would love to go to the moon. You know, someone with a lower-limb disability, when you propose that against walking on the moon, it's quite a powerful statement, and I would love to do that.
Editor's note: This interview has been condensed and edited for clarity.
Since it launched from Kennedy Space Center on April 1, 2026, we've been treated to some truly incredible photos of NASA's historic Artemis II mission, including a dump of 12,000 images captured by the crew. But a blurry snap, which shows the crewed Orion capsule as nothing more than a handful of black and white pixels, is a contender for the most impressive Artemis II photo β because it was captured by an Earth-based telescope more than 200,000 miles (320,000 kilometers) away.
This makes the photo a candidate for the longest-distance image of humans ever taken from Earth. (Images like the "Pale Blue Dot," which were taken from space, don't count.)
The trippy image, shared May 6 by the National Radio Astronomy Observatory (NRAO), was captured by the U.S. National Science Foundation Green Bank Telescope (NSF GBT) in West Virginia. NSF GBT consists of a 328-foot-wide (100 meters) radio dish on a circular rail, making it the world's largest fully steerable radio telescope. It played a key role in tracking the Orion capsule (nicknamed Integrity) throughout the Artemis II mission.
At first glance, the photo might not seem striking, but when you start to think about what you're actually looking at and the technology required to capture it, it becomes much more impressive.
The National Science Foundation Green Bank Telescope in West Virginia snapped the Artemis II crew from approximately 213,000 miles (343,000 km) away, shortly before or after their record-breaking slingshot around the moon. (Image credit: Main: GBO/NRAO; insert: JPL & NSF/AUI/NSF NRAO)
"There are four people in those pixels," Will Armentrout, a NSF GBT astronomer who helped track Artemis II, commented to his colleagues when they first saw the image, according to an NRAO statement.
Those four people were mission commander Reid Wiseman, pilot Victor Glover and mission specialist Christina Koch of NASA, as well as mission specialist Jeremy Hansen of the Canadian Space Agency β each of whom broke a different individual spaceflight record during the mission.
Astronauts Reid Wiseman (right), Victor Glover (bottom), Christina Koch (left) and Jeremy Hansen (top) traveled further from Earth than any other human in history when they went around the moon on April 6. (Image credit: NASA)
The NSF GBT team was also keeping a close eye on Artemis II and helped to accurately track the crew's progress during six-hour observation windows on each of the five days Integrity was closest to the moon. The telescope's extreme sensitivity and precision helped provide crucial data that will help NASA prepare for future Artemis missions, which aim to establish a base on the moon.
"With the GBT, we were able to track the movement of the spacecraft within 0.2 millimeters [0.008 inches] per second of what NASA calculated in its projections," Anthony Remijan, the NSF GBT's site director, said in the statement. "It's like having a speedometer in your car that can track your speed within 0.0004 decimal places per hour."
The Artemis II crew lifted off from the Kennedy Space Center in Florida on April 1 and landed just off coast of San Diego on April 10, having traveled a total of 695,000 miles (1.1 million km). (Image credit: NASA/Bill Ingalls)
This is a great example of how scientific institutions across the globe contributed to the mission.
"To get big things done like we're doing in this capsule β¦ you need a big team behind you," Hansen said during an interview while on board Integrity.
This article was first published May 14, 2026.
Artemis II quiz: Is your knowledge of NASA's historic moon mission out of this world?