Lead researcher Federico De Pascalis of the Italian Institute for Environmental Protection and Research (ISPRA) holds a Mediterranean storm petrel.
A. Benvenuti
You might think birds skimming over the ocean wouldn’t seek wind unless it was pushing them in the right direction, but NASA-funded researchers have learned that storm petrels find stiff crosswinds worth the slowdown, in return for the clues and cues the gusts carry.
In a paper published by the Royal Society’s Biology Letters May 13, researchers from Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution (WHOI) and the Italian Institute for Environmental Protection and Research (ISPRA) found that Mediterranean storm petrels actively sought out crosswinds, which carried odors the birds used to navigate toward prey. The birds were effectively trading the extra energy needed to fly in a crosswind for the information it blows toward them.
These sparrow-sized birds routinely undertake foraging trips hundreds of miles over the sea, returning to the breeding colony to relieve their partners from incubation duties. Until recently, their small size has precluded researchers’ ability to tag them, keeping their journeys a mystery. In 2020 and 2021, working on the Italian island Sardinia, the team, led by ISPRA and WHOI, attached lightweight GPS sensors to the birds, adding just 3.3% of the birds’ weight as they set out over the Mediterranean Sea.
This finding could help reveal how changing winds might impact seabirds’ feeding, breeding, energy levels, and survival, adding insights about patterns of nutrients in the sea — and the forces that create them.
Warming waters decrease upwelling and lead to stress on marine microorganisms due to limited availability of vital nutrients. Red indicates the regions of highest nutrient-related stress.
Kel Elkins/NASA’s Scientific Visualization Studio
Editor’s note: This article was updated on June 5.
A new study combining NASA satellite observations, ocean surveys, and genetic testing on marine microorganisms found evidence that warming ocean waters may be limiting nutrient availability across much of the global ocean. The researchers report that this nutrient stress affects microscopic marine organisms and could influence marine ecosystems over time.
The research, published June 5 in Science Advances, tracked the condition of phytoplankton, which form the base of ocean food webs. Rather than measuring nutrients like nitrogen, iron, and phosphorus directly, the researchers inferred stress by tracking subtle shifts in the ratio of carbon to chlorophyll in phytoplankton observed from space. When the amount of chlorophyll decreases relative to carbon as seen in satellite data, it’s an indication that the plankton are stressed.
“As our ocean continues to change, the ability to observe and track ocean conditions through sustained, high quality remote sensing observations has never been more important,” said Laura Lorenzoni, Program Scientist for NASA’s Ocean Biology and Biogeochemistry Program at NASA Headquarters in Washington. “This is fundamental, as plankton communities are the base of the marine food web on which important economic activities rely.”
The research team combined two decades of data from NASA’s Aqua satellite’s Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) sensor with plankton samples collected on research cruises around the world. The approach linked large-scale satellite observations with genetic markers in Prochlorococcus, a tiny but abundant marine microbe that shows signs of nutrient stress in its DNA. The result is a global map revealing where phytoplankton are thriving and where they’re struggling.
Ocean chlorophyll, as observed with NASA’s Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) instrument between January 2010 through May 2016.
Marit Jentoft-Nilsen/NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center
The strongest indications of nutrient stress on plankton appeared in the subtropical gyres, which are vast, relatively calm regions of the Atlantic, Pacific, and Indian oceans. In these areas, a layer of warm surface water stifles the flow of colder water from deeper in the ocean.
“When the surface of the ocean warms, it generates this very stable situation where a layer of low-density water sits on top of higher-density cold water,” said study coauthor Adam Martiny, an oceanographer at the University of California, Irvine. “You’ve probably experienced that if you’ve ever been to a lake in the summertime—it’s super warm right on the surface, and very cold deeper down when you stick your legs in.”
This layering blocks the upward flow of nutrient-rich water, limiting the availability of ocean surface nutrients that are crucial for plankton. In the South Pacific, one of the most nutrient-poor regions, a layer of warm surface water contributed to nitrogen and iron shortages, producing the most severe nutrient-related stress that the team discovered.
But the researchers were surprised to find that parts of the North Atlantic experience less nutrient stress than expected. Although there was evidence of a lack of phosphorus, the impact on microorganisms was comparatively mild.
That difference may reflect the biology of the organisms themselves. Phytoplankton can partially compensate for phosphorus shortages by recycling phosphorus more efficiently or replacing phosphorus-rich molecules inside their cells. Nitrogen shortages are harder to overcome because nitrogen is crucial for the proteins and cellular machinery required for photosynthesis and nutrient uptake.
The study revealed that nutrient stress is strongly correlated with seasons and major weather cycles such as El Niño and the Pacific Decadal Oscillation, which lead to warming waters in the Pacific Ocean. During La Niña events, which cool water over a large part of the Pacific, stronger upwelling brought more nutrients to surface waters and reduced stress in some regions. Superimposed on those multi-year cycles, however, was a longer-term trend.
From 2002 through 2021, average sea-surface temperatures increased across nearly 90% of the ocean area examined in the study. Over the same period, nutrient stress generally intensified, consistent with previous hypothesis that warming oceans may become increasingly stratified and less able to replenish surface nutrients.
In many nutrient-poor regions of the Southern Hemisphere, however, the researchers found evidence that nutrient stress had not increased as much as expected despite significant warming. They suspect that microbes capable of capturing nitrogen from the air may partially offset the effects of reduced nutrient mixing.
That finding hints that marine ecosystems may possess more resilience to warming climates than some models predict. It also underscores the complexity of forecasting how ocean biology will respond to continued warming.
“We have two really powerful tools,” said study coauthor Michael Behrenfeld, a biochemist with Oregon State University in Corvallis, Oregon. The tools include satellite observations and cellular studies. “Both produce big data sets, but they are kind of opposites. We have very detailed data about microscopic phytoplankton … and then we have global coverage with satellites.”
By combining satellites that monitor the entire ocean with genetic clues carried inside microscopic plankton, the researchers say they are gaining a new way to track biological responses to changing environmental conditions near real time.
Quelque 150 millions d'hectares partis en fumée en seulement quatre mois. Ce chiffre donne le vertige. 2026 s'impose déjà comme une année climatique sans équivalent dans les annales, et les scientifiques tirent la sonnette d'alarme.
La deuxième édition du baromètre "Starfish" décrit un océan de plus en plus pollué par les activités humaines. Les solutions existent mais elles tardent à se mettre en place.
The Ocean Observatories Initiative has been collecting data on physical, chemical, geological and biological conditions in the Atlantic and Pacific Oceans for the past decade
Warming waters decrease upwelling and lead to stress on marine microorganisms due to limited availability of vital nutrients. Red indicates the regions of highest nutrient-related stress.
Kel Elkins/NASA’s Scientific Visualization Studio
Editor’s note: This article was updated on June 5.
A new study combining NASA satellite observations, ocean surveys, and genetic testing on marine microorganisms found evidence that warming ocean waters may be limiting nutrient availability across much of the global ocean. The researchers report that this nutrient stress affects microscopic marine organisms and could influence marine ecosystems over time.
The research, published June 5 in Science Advances, tracked the condition of phytoplankton, which form the base of ocean food webs. Rather than measuring nutrients like nitrogen, iron, and phosphorus directly, the researchers inferred stress by tracking subtle shifts in the ratio of carbon to chlorophyll in phytoplankton observed from space. When the amount of chlorophyll decreases relative to carbon as seen in satellite data, it’s an indication that the plankton are stressed.
“As our ocean continues to change, the ability to observe and track ocean conditions through sustained, high quality remote sensing observations has never been more important,” said Laura Lorenzoni, Program Scientist for NASA’s Ocean Biology and Biogeochemistry Program at NASA Headquarters in Washington. “This is fundamental, as plankton communities are the base of the marine food web on which important economic activities rely.”
The research team combined two decades of data from NASA’s Aqua satellite’s Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) sensor with plankton samples collected on research cruises around the world. The approach linked large-scale satellite observations with genetic markers in Prochlorococcus, a tiny but abundant marine microbe that shows signs of nutrient stress in its DNA. The result is a global map revealing where phytoplankton are thriving and where they’re struggling.
Ocean chlorophyll, as observed with NASA's Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) instrument between January 2010 through May 2016.
Marit Jentoft-Nilsen/NASA's Goddard Space Flight Center
The strongest indications of nutrient stress on plankton appeared in the subtropical gyres, which are vast, relatively calm regions of the Atlantic, Pacific, and Indian oceans. In these areas, a layer of warm surface water stifles the flow of colder water from deeper in the ocean.
“When the surface of the ocean warms, it generates this very stable situation where a layer of low-density water sits on top of higher-density cold water,” said study coauthor Adam Martiny, an oceanographer at the University of California, Irvine. “You’ve probably experienced that if you’ve ever been to a lake in the summertime—it’s super warm right on the surface, and very cold deeper down when you stick your legs in.”
This layering blocks the upward flow of nutrient-rich water, limiting the availability of ocean surface nutrients that are crucial for plankton. In the South Pacific, one of the most nutrient-poor regions, a layer of warm surface water contributed to nitrogen and iron shortages, producing the most severe nutrient-related stress that the team discovered.
But the researchers were surprised to find that parts of the North Atlantic experience less nutrient stress than expected. Although there was evidence of a lack of phosphorus, the impact on microorganisms was comparatively mild.
That difference may reflect the biology of the organisms themselves. Phytoplankton can partially compensate for phosphorus shortages by recycling phosphorus more efficiently or replacing phosphorus-rich molecules inside their cells. Nitrogen shortages are harder to overcome because nitrogen is crucial for the proteins and cellular machinery required for photosynthesis and nutrient uptake.
The study revealed that nutrient stress is strongly correlated with seasons and major weather cycles such as El Niño and the Pacific Decadal Oscillation, which lead to warming waters in the Pacific Ocean. During La Niña events, which cool water over a large part of the Pacific, stronger upwelling brought more nutrients to surface waters and reduced stress in some regions. Superimposed on those multi-year cycles, however, was a longer-term trend.
From 2002 through 2021, average sea-surface temperatures increased across nearly 90% of the ocean area examined in the study. Over the same period, nutrient stress generally intensified, consistent with previous hypothesis that warming oceans may become increasingly stratified and less able to replenish surface nutrients.
In many nutrient-poor regions of the Southern Hemisphere, however, the researchers found evidence that nutrient stress had not increased as much as expected despite significant warming. They suspect that microbes capable of capturing nitrogen from the air may partially offset the effects of reduced nutrient mixing.
That finding hints that marine ecosystems may possess more resilience to warming climates than some models predict. It also underscores the complexity of forecasting how ocean biology will respond to continued warming.
“We have two really powerful tools,” said study coauthor Michael Behrenfeld, a biochemist with Oregon State University in Corvallis, Oregon. The tools include satellite observations and cellular studies. “Both produce big data sets, but they are kind of opposites. We have very detailed data about microscopic phytoplankton … and then we have global coverage with satellites.”
By combining satellites that monitor the entire ocean with genetic clues carried inside microscopic plankton, the researchers say they are gaining a new way to track biological responses to changing environmental conditions near real time.
Depuis quelques années, une présence étrange s’étire en silence à la surface de l’Atlantique. Vue de l’espace, elle dessine un immense ruban brun reliant deux continents. Ce phénomène, quasi inconnu il y a peu, intrigue les scientifiques autant qu’il inquiète les riverains.
L’administration de Donald Trump a récemment annoncé son intention de démanteler le vaste réseau océanographique Ocean Observatories Initiative. Ce dispositif, pourtant crucial pour l’étude du climat et des océans, pourrait ainsi perdre l’essentiel de ses instruments de mesure d’ici 2027. Une...
Take a plunge into Australia’s Great Barrier Reef, and you’ll come face to face with a what looks like a gorgeous rocky garden. This dazzling array of corals is the largest living structure on Earth. Some, like staghorn coral, look like leafless bushes sprouting from the ocean floor. Others, such as honeycomb coral, resemble rocks dotted with tiny holes. Then there’s brain coral, which, you guessed it, look like brains. And that’s just a small sample of the brilliant diversity to be found in a reef.
Despite their appearance, corals are animals. These invertebrates are close relatives of jellyfish and sea anemones. Most corals live in colonies of thousands of tiny individuals called polyps growing together. Each polyp sports a cylindrical body topped with a ring of tentacles surrounding its mouth.
“You can think of them as upside-down jellyfish,” says Peter Cowman. At Queensland Museum Tropics in Townsville, Australia, this marine biologist studies the evolutionary history of corals.
A coral looks somewhat like an upside-down jellyfish, one that is attached to a skeleton made of calcium carbonate. In the coral’s tentacles are stinging nematocysts that help it catch prey and zooxanthellae that make energy from sunlight.ttsz/iStock/Getty Images Plus
Like their jellyfish cousins, coral polyps use tentacles to feed and defend themselves. These appendages are packed with specialized stinging cells called nematocysts. Each contains a coiled, barbed thread. When touched, the cell “fires” this thread to inject venom into its target. Most corals hunt at night, snagging tiny zooplankton, floating eggs and small fish.
Many corals have a more laid-back way of feeding, too. Inside their tissues, they house algae called zooxanthellae (Zoh-uh-ZAN-thuh-lay). (This is an example of symbiosis, where two creatures benefit by associating together.) These single-celled organisms are photosynthetic. They use light and carbon dioxide to make sugars and proteins. Most of these nutrients are offered to the coral. “In return, the coral gives them a safe apartment to live in,” says Cowman. “They’re the solar-powered roommates.”
Corals that rely on light-powered algae live in shallow, warm waters. It’s here where you find coral reefs. These structures are made by a type of coral called hard or stony corals. “They are the engineers of the reef system,” says Cowman.
Stony corals produce hard skeletons of aragonite, a mineral made of calcium carbonate. Over hundreds to thousands of years, generations of polyps can build up massive reef systems.
Soft corals, like their name implies, don’t make these stony skeletons. Instead, they have bendy structures that move with ocean currents. They can often be found living among reefs, though. “The soft corals are like the decorators,” says Cowman. “They look like underwater swaying trees and fans.”
Some corals — both soft and hard — can live in deep water, up to 6,000 meters (20,000 feet) below the water surface. Stony corals found at these depths are often smaller than their shallow-water counterparts. Most tend to live as single polyps. Some species do create reefs, but they’re less of a team effort. Called “mounds,” these deep reefs grow over the skeletons of old or dead corals on the ocean floor.
Reefs at risk
The first true corals appeared about 500 million years ago. But many of today’s reef-building corals can be traced back to the end of the Cretaceous Period some 66 million years ago. That’s when an asteroid impact wiped out about 80 percent of all animals (including the nonbird dinosaurs).
“The mass extinction had an effect in the oceans as well,” says Cowman. Existing reef-builders died out. Their extinction allowed stony corals to take their place. Today, corals are found in all of the world’s oceans.
But many are at risk from human activities. These dangers include pollution and destructive or heavy fishing. One of the biggest threats is climate change. High water temperatures and too much sunlight can stress corals, leading to a phenomenon called coral bleaching.
When coral is stressed, such as when water temperatures are high, it can lose its algae — and its color. If the stress goes away, the algae may return. If not, the coral remain pale and vulnerable.NOAA
At higher temperatures, the algae produce toxic compounds. “When the water gets too hot, the coral gets stressed and they evict their zooxanthellae,” says Cowman. These microbes are also responsible for a coral’s bright colors. In their absence, the coral’s tissues turn transparent. All that remains visible is the coral’s white skeleton.
Bleaching doesn’t kill the coral immediately. If conditions improve, the coral may recover and even take the algae back in. But if coral go too long without their algal partners, they may get sick or die. “If they can’t get the zooxanthellae back in again, they [will] actually starve to death,” says Cowman.
This bleaching affects coral worldwide. Since 2023, the world’s corals have been experiencing the largest bleaching event on record.
Coral reefs, such as this one off Florida, face many risks, including climate change, pollution and overfishing. DurdenImages/iStock/Getty Images Plus
Rainforests of the sea
Many scientists and conservationists are concerned about corals’ future. Coral reefs are among Earth’s most diverse ecosystems. Though they cover less than one percent of the seafloor, coral reefs support at least one-fourth of all marine species. “On land, you think of rainforests as having all that diversity,” says Cowman. “The rainforests of the sea are the coral reefs.”
Corals are important for people, too. Humans rely on many reef-dwelling species for food. Reefs can also buffer coasts against damage from strong waves or storms, says Cowman. Chemical compounds from reef animals have been found to help fight pain and treat cancer. And reefs support tourism around the globe. The food, products, jobs and coastal protection provided by corals are estimated to be worth $2.7 trillion per year.
Says Cowman, “as humans, we rely on reefs a lot in our daily lives, even if we don’t think of it.”
As offshore wind farms expand rapidly in the global renewable energy transition, scientists are studying how these large marine infrastructure projects affect ecosystems beneath the waves. Research from Wageningen University & Research in the Netherlands suggests that offshore wind may bring both risks and benefits for sharks and rays, known collectively as Elasmobranchii, which are highly sensitive to electromagnetic fields (EMFs). A six-year project called “Elasmopower” examined how EMFs from subsea power cables in offshore wind farms affect bottom-dwelling sharks and rays. These species depend on natural electric and magnetic fields for key behaviors such as navigation, prey detection, habitat use and long-distance movement, particularly in low-visibility environments. The studies conducted as part of the Elasmopower project have been published in four papers, with three additional papers currently undergoing peer review. Sharks and rays have specialized electroreceptors called ampullae of Lorenzini. The jelly-filled sensory canals around the head and snout can detect even extremely weak EMFs from prey and predators, water movement, and the Earth’s geomagnetic field, Erwin Winter, a scientist at Wageningen, told Mongabay. This system is central to hunting and orientation, making Elasmobranchii especially relevant for studying EMF exposure from offshore energy infrastructure, Winter added. Erwin Winter, a researcher with the Elasmopower project, presented findings on offshore wind, electromagnetic fields and bottom-dwelling sharks and rays at the Sharks International 2026 conference in Colombo, Sri Lanka, in May. Image by Malaka Rodrigo for Mongabay. During a presentation on a summary of the Elasmopower research at the Sharks International 2026…This article was originally published on Mongabay
My biblical creation model of the solar system expects the presence of icy materials forming the outer planets and celestial bodies. Recent findings of water and ice in bodies like Ceres, and moons of Jupiter and Saturn support this theory, confirming the Genesis account of creation.
Recent research suggests Mars may have once hosted oceans and sandy beaches, contradicting claims of insufficient water for a worldwide flood on Earth. While geological features indicate past water flow on Mars, the planet remains lifeless due to its harsh conditions.