Above a certain threshold, galaxies stop growing , no matter how much raw material they have on hand. The question is: what flips the switch?

Nous avons bien progressé en ce qui concerne les observations et la théorie des trous noirs supermassifs au cœur des galaxies. Mais celui de notre Voie lactée déroutait les astrophysiciens depuis presque 50 ans en ce qui concerne une énigme avec des vents de matière. L'énigme semble résolue...

The Magellanic Clouds are a pair of dwarf galaxies passing the Milky Way probably for the first time, but as they move they have been interacting with each other for billions of years.

How do massive galaxies form and evolve? A recent study traces the stellar and dust distributions across evolutionary phases of massive galaxies to better understand how massive dusty star-forming galaxies fit into the picture.

Dusty Massive Galaxies

Massive galaxies, like the Milky Way or even larger, undergo phases of active star formation and quiescent phases of inactivity, but exactly how these galaxies evolve through these stages is not yet fully understood. Dusty star-forming galaxies, which are undergoing a period of intense star formation and shrouded in dust, might be the missing evolutionary step between star-forming and quiescent phases of massive galaxy evolution. 

Currently, the leading explanation for massive galaxy formation and evolution is inside-out growth — star formation and quenching start in the inner regions of a galaxy and progress outward. However, it’s not clear whether dusty star-forming galaxies also follow the favored inside-out pathway, or if they instead proceed outside-in, first growing their disks and then assembling a central bulge.

The spatial distribution (or morphology) of the stars and dust within dusty massive galaxies can help us trace their evolution. Thanks to high-resolution observations from JWST and the Atacama Large Millimeter/submillimeter Array (ALMA), researchers can now directly compare the morphologies of distant star-forming, quiescent, and dusty galaxies during the height of our universe’s star formation. Filling this gap will reveal how dusty star-forming galaxies may connect star-forming and quiescent galaxies in massive galaxy evolution.

Multiwavelength Morphological Comparisons

To directly compare the star and dust morphologies across massive galaxies, Sarah Bodansky (University of Massachusetts, Amherst) and collaborators selected a sample of 33 dusty star-forming galaxies from the GOODS-ALMA 2.0 survey that searched the sky for 1.1-mm dust emission as well as star-forming and quiescent comparison samples drawn from JWST observations. Combining the ALMA survey data with JWST imaging, the authors studied the rest-frame optical (stars) and rest-frame near-infrared (dust) morphologies of dusty, star-forming, and quiescent galaxies at redshifts around cosmic noon (a few billion years after the Big Bang).

When comparing optical morphologies, the authors found that dusty star-forming galaxies and typical star-forming galaxies had similar distributions, but their near-infrared morphologies showed clear differences. Dusty galaxies tended to show more compact near-infrared emission, with dust tracing their stellar populations and more concentrated in the galaxies’ central regions. Though clearly different from star-forming galaxies, the authors noted striking similarities between the near-infrared morphologies of the dusty star-forming and quiescent galaxies, especially within their centers.

All of these properties suggest that dusty star-forming galaxies have built up stellar mass and dust in their cores, potentially forming a central bulge first and supporting an inside-out model of massive galaxy growth. This points to dusty star-forming galaxies as possible direct progenitors of early massive quiescent galaxies, hanging onto their last bit of star formation before becoming quiet as well. While this study morphologically distinguishes dusty galaxies from their star-forming and quiescent counterparts, future spectroscopic studies comparing the kinematics of these populations and investigations of molecular gas distributions are necessary to better pin down the evolutionary connection between star-forming, dusty, and quiescent massive galaxies.

Citation

“JWST+ALMA Reveal the Buildup of Stellar Mass in the Cores of Dusty Star-forming Galaxies at Cosmic Noon,” Sarah Bodansky et al 2026 ApJ 1001 235. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ae4f64

The post Hints for Massive Galaxy Evolution from Dusty Star-Forming Galaxies appeared first on AAS Nova.

The core of the brightest galaxy in the cluster Abell 402 contains a curious void. New observations suggest that an ultra-massive black hole could have excavated this feature.

At the Center of the Center of a Cluster

Abell 402 is a galaxy cluster located roughly 4 billion light-years away, and at its center is a giant elliptical galaxy called A402-BCG. Zooming in on the heart of this galaxy, astronomers using the Hubble Space Telescope discovered a dark region that they suspected was due to a cloud of dust blocking the starlight from the galaxy’s center.

In a recent research article, a team led by Michael McDonald (Massachusetts Institute of Technology) investigated this dark region to test the dust-cloud hypothesis and explore other explanations.

McDonald’s team compiled new JWST Near-Infrared Camera data, archival Hubble imaging, and spectroscopy from the Multi Unit Spectroscopic Explorer (MUSE) on the Very Large Telescope. The new JWST images show a prominent dark feature at the center of A402-BCG, plus a bright source directly beside it.

Not Hidden, but Missing

If the dark feature at the center of A402-BCG is a dust cloud, the cloud would be less obscuring at the near-infrared wavelengths captured by JWST than at the optical wavelengths sampled by Hubble. However, the feature was equally dark in the JWST images, leading the team to rule out the dust-cloud hypothesis.

Instead, they favor a scenario in which the dark feature is due to an absence of stars rather than the presence of obscuring dust. The team estimated that 2 billion solar masses of stars are missing — equivalent to 1% of the stellar mass of the galaxy. What’s more, the cavity is situated in a larger region of constant surface brightness called a core, in which there are fewer stars than expected.

The Dynamical History of A402-BCG

McDonald and coauthors suggested that the missing stars in A402-BCG’s core and cavity were ejected by at least one supermassive black hole binary. They estimated that the core region, which is roughly 6,500 light-years across, was excavated by a 50 billion solar mass black hole. This epic black hole may be the result of a past merger and is likely located at the infrared-bright spot on the border of the cavity, as this source’s spectral energy distribution resembles that of an actively accreting black hole.

MUSE spectroscopy provided evidence for a second black hole. These data revealed two pockets of ionized gas — one coincident with the infrared-bright source, the other on the opposite side of the cavity — as well as two distinct sets of emission lines consistent with a black hole binary totaling 60 ± 20 billion solar masses. (The team noted that alternate explanations for the second source, like a compact starburst, were less likely but couldn’t be ruled out.)

The team favors a scenario in which these black holes are slowly spiraling toward one another, ejecting stars from the galaxy’s center as they move and carving out a deep deficit of stars. This stellar cavity sits within a larger region of stellar scarcity that was scooped out by a past supermassive black hole merger that created the ultra-massive black hole present in the galaxy today. Simulations suggest that only about 0.5% of massive galaxies are in this phase of evolution at a time, so we may have caught A402-BCG in a fascinating moment — one that provides new clues about how to search for ongoing black hole mergers in other galaxies.

Citation

“A Kiloparsec-Scale Stellar Cavity in the Center of A402-BCG May Be Caused by Dynamic Interactions with an Ultramassive Black Hole,” Michael McDonald et al 2026 ApJL 1002 L19. doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ae5bbe

The post Into the Void: Investigating the Heart of a Giant Elliptical Galaxy appeared first on AAS Nova.

Editor’s Note: Astrobites is a graduate-student-run organization that digests astrophysical literature for undergraduate students. As part of the partnership between the AAS and astrobites, we occasionally repost astrobites content here at AAS Nova. We hope you enjoy this post from astrobites; the original can be viewed at astrobites.org.

Title: Metal-Poor Star-Forming Clumps in Cosmic Noon Galaxies: Evidence for Gas Inflow and Chemical Dilution Using JWST NIRISS
Authors: Vicente Estrada-Carpenter et al.
First Author’s Institution: Arizona State University
Status: Published in ApJ

If you want to reconstruct a galaxy’s life story, one of the best “fossil records” is its metallicity. In astronomy this refers to the abundance of elements heavier than helium, which are made in stars and returned to a galaxy’s gas through winds and supernovae. Over time, more star formation usually means more metals mixed into the gas.

Now zoom to Cosmic Noon (roughly when the universe was most actively forming stars). Many galaxies in this epoch look “clumpy”; their star formation is concentrated in several bright knots scattered across the disk. The big question is where those clumps come from. Do they form from the galaxy’s own gas via internal disk instabilities, or do they light up when fresh, metal-poor gas flows in and both fuels star formation and dilutes the local metallicity?

The authors try to answer that question with JWST by measuring the metallicity of each clump relative to its immediate surroundings, rather than comparing clumps to a single galaxy-wide number (which can be misleading if the galaxy has a metallicity gradient).

They use JWST/Near Infrared Imager and Slitless Spectrograph (NIRISS) slitless grism spectroscopy from the CAnadian NIRISS Unbiased Cluster Survey (CANUCS) to study 20 lensed galaxies at redshift 0.6 < z < 1.35. (Lensing effectively acts like a zoom lens, helping to resolve smaller structures.) They focus on emission lines that trace star-forming gas, especially Hα (a star formation tracer) and sulfur lines [SII] and [SIII] (needed for their metallicity method).

Slitless spectra come with a headache: because there is no slit, different parts of a galaxy can overlap in the dispersed image. To make reliable emission-line maps from slitless data, the authors use a forward-modeling code called Sleuth, which allows the continuum to vary across the galaxy.

The authors identify clumps using the Hα map together with rest-frame ultraviolet imaging because these tracers are sensitive to star formation on different timescales: Hα highlights gas ionized by the youngest massive stars, while ultraviolet light traces young stellar light over longer periods. As a result a clump can be bright in one and not the other, especially if dust is involved.

To estimate gas-phase metallicity, they use the “strong-line” method, which infers metallicity from ratios of bright emission lines calibrated using models and empirical samples. Their main diagnostic is S23 = ([SIII] + [SII]) / Hα. Because some line ratios also depend on the ionization state (how strongly the gas is being ionized by young stars), they also use the sulfur ratio S32 = [SIII]/[SII] as a check and iterate to a self-consistent solution.

So, Are Clumps Really Chemically Different from Their Surroundings?

For each clump, the authors measure the metallicity inside the clump and compare it to an annulus just outside the clump (masking neighboring clumps to avoid mixing). When they plot “clump metallicity” versus “local disk metallicity,” most points fall below the 1-to-1 line, meaning the clumps are more metal poor than their surroundings (Figure 1). The mean offset is about 0.1 dex, which corresponds to roughly 20% dilution in the clump gas.

An extra wrinkle is that the galaxy medians hint at two populations: some galaxies have clumps with small offsets (near the 1-to-1 line), while others show larger offsets. The authors suggest this could mean two formation pathways, one dominated by internal gas reservoirs (smaller offsets) and another where inflow of metal-poor gas plays a bigger role (larger offsets). They are careful, though, as the sample is still small.

If inflow is really the driver, you should expect a link: the more strongly a clump is forming stars relative to its surroundings, the more diluted its metallicity should be. That is exactly what the authors find. The clumps that are most boosted in star formation are also the most metal diluted.

The article also emphasizes that clumps are not chemically uniform blobs. In at least one detailed example, the peaks in Hα (highest star formation) coincide with local minima in metallicity along a cut through the galaxy (Figure 2), suggesting internal star formation rate and metallicity gradients that reinforce the same story, intense star formation goes hand in hand with lower metallicity in the clump regions.

Are These Clumps Really “In Situ,” or Could They Be Small Satellites?

A reasonable alternative is that some clumps are actually small companion galaxies projected onto the disk. These could also look metal poor, because low-mass galaxies tend to be low metallicity. The authors look for evidence using face-on systems and find that more massive clumps tend to sit closer to galaxy centers, which is consistent with in-situ clumps that form in the disk and migrate inward, though it does not rule out satellites. They argue that kinematics from JWST/NIRSpec IFU will be needed for a definitive separation.

Why This Matters

Gas inflow, star formation, and feedback, together known as the baryon cycle, are key drivers of how galaxies grow. What this article adds is a spatially resolved view that compares each clump to its local environment, showing that regions of elevated star formation also tend to be locally metal poor. That pairing is hard to explain as a simple metallicity gradient or a galaxy-wide averaging effect, and it is exactly what you would expect if at least some clumps are being fueled by relatively metal-poor inflows. In short, these clumps may be snapshots of galaxies refueling in real time.

Original astrobite edited by Ryan White.

About the author, Niloofar Sharei:

I’m an astronomy PhD candidate at UC Riverside studying how galaxies grow through star-forming clumps. I track how these clumps emerge, evolve, and sometimes survive long enough to reshape their galaxies. When I’m not thinking about cosmic blobs, I’m reading, hiking, or listening to Bach.

The post Feed the Fire, Fade the Metals appeared first on AAS Nova.

How does environment shape a galaxy’s growth and evolution? This is the question explored in a recent study led by Gissel Montaguth (University of São Paulo). Montaguth’s team examined nearly 4,000 galaxies in low-mass, high-mass, and compact galaxy groups, as well as galaxies adrift in the field without belonging to a group. The sampled galaxies were classified as early-type, late-type, transition (generally disk galaxies with quenched star formation), or other (generally elliptical but with lingering star formation). The image above shows six transition galaxies from the sample, three of which show signs of past disturbances (top row). The team found that early-type and “other” galaxies were resilient to changes in environment, but late-type and transition galaxies could be affected by life in close groups. Late-type galaxies in compact groups tended to be somewhat smaller than their loosely grouped or field galaxy counterparts, while transition galaxies showed a significantly steeper stellar mass–size relation in group environments and smaller sizes in groups than in the field. This suggests that transition galaxies are strongly influenced by interactions, mergers, and processes like disk truncation. To learn more about the impact of environment on galaxy properties, be sure to check out the full article linked below.

Citation

“Galaxies Caught in Transition: The Role of Group Environment in Shaping the Mass–Size Relation in the Local Universe,” Gissel P. Montaguth et al 2026 ApJ 999 160. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ae42ca

The post Featured Image: Galaxies Caught in Transition appeared first on AAS Nova.

How do galaxies grow? A massive survey from JWST can help astronomers answer that fundamental question about galaxy evolution.

Time Machines

When astronomers look into the night, they are greeted by a sky full to bursting with galaxies. But immediately after the Big Bang, none of these grand structures could have existed in our universe: all of the matter was too hot and dense to collapse into the whirlpools and ellipses we see today. We know that it took time for dark matter to collapse into halos, for gas to cool and fall into those halos, and even more time for those halos to merge together and galaxies to form. However, quantifying that story is tricky. How long did it take for the gas to cool and collapse? How often did small galaxies merge? How did the birth and death of stars play into all of this?

One way astronomers could go about answering these deep, fundamental questions in galaxy evolution would be to look at many galaxies spread across different distances. Famously, since the speed of light is fairly slow (cosmically speaking), we can only see distant objects as they appeared in the past. (This is why any aliens looking toward Earth from 65 million light-years away — from within the Virgo Cluster, perhaps — would see our planet as it was when dinosaurs roamed free.) In principle, then, by looking at a progression of galaxies farther and farther away, astronomers could convert these still images into a sort of movie of how typical galaxies look moving further and further back in time.

Seeing Red

There is a complication to this strategy, however. The farther away an object is, the more the light it emits is stretched towards redder wavelengths. As a consequence, any telescope designed to detect visible light won’t see anything; to take pictures of these galaxies, we need to build detectors that are specifically sensitive to stretched-out, near-infrared light.

This is one of the primary reasons that JWST was designed, constructed, and flung into space. It was purpose-built to collect and analyze near-infrared light from distant galaxies, and now after several years of observations and data crunching, astronomers are finally getting some answers to those fundamental questions.

A Massive Survey

Recently, a team led by Lilan Yang, Rochester Institute of Technology, released their analysis of one of the earliest and largest surveys JWST has undertaken, a program called COSMOS-Web. The researchers mined a patch of sky about the size of the full Moon and extracted more than 30,000 distant galaxies, most of which had never before been seen by human eyes. They measured the brightness and size of each one and grouped them according to their redshift (a proxy for their distance) and whether they were actively forming stars or not.

The team found that, unsurprisingly, galaxies tend to grow over time. Excitingly, however, they also found that for star-forming galaxies, the relationship between a galaxy’s mass and its size is fairly constant for redshifts of z = 2–8. The scaling law between them also nicely matches up with measurements taken by the Hubble Space Telescope at smaller redshifts. Beyond that, though, for redshifts of z = 8–10, it’s possible that the scaling changes, though the authors emphasize that their sample is much smaller in these distant bins.

While more data are needed to confirm whether the youngest of these galaxies grow at a different pace than their later counterparts, we can be comforted that studies like this represent just our very first peek into a whole new era of galactic evolution, and that many more insights are sure to come as JWST keeps snapping images.

Editor’s Note: This article previously contained an error relating to the distance at which aliens would see Earth as it was when inhabited by dinosaurs. This error was corrected on 4 May 2026.

Citation

“COSMOS-Web: Unraveling the Evolution of Galaxy Size and Related Properties at 2 < z < 10,” Lilan Yang et al 2025 ApJS 281 68. doi:10.3847/1538-4365/ae0e1b

The post How Galaxies Grow Up appeared first on AAS Nova.

Editor’s Note: Astrobites is a graduate-student-run organization that digests astrophysical literature for undergraduate students. As part of the partnership between the AAS and astrobites, we occasionally repost astrobites content here at AAS Nova. We hope you enjoy this post from astrobites; the original can be viewed at astrobites.org.

Title: GLIMPSE: An Ultrafaint ≃10⁵ M_⊙ Pop III Galaxy Candidate and First Constraints on the Pop III UV Luminosity Function at z ≃ 6–7
Authors: Seiji Fujimoto et al.
First Author’s Institution: University of Toronto; The University of Texas at Austin
Status: Published in ApJ

You, me, your laptop, my $8 matcha, and just about everything else on Earth was forged in the fiery bellies of dying stars. Generations of stars had to live and die before the universe became enriched with any elements heavier than helium (what astronomers call “metals”). The first stars to undergo this cosmic cycle are known as Population III (Pop III) stars. Though their existence has been hypothesized since the 1960s, astronomers have failed to observe these distant metal-free stars or the faint, low-mass galaxies that host them.

The first Pop III stars likely formed around 100 million years after the Big Bang in pristine pockets of hydrogen gas. Although these are too distant for us to observe, we expect that as the universe started to become metal enriched, there were still existing pockets of gas introverted enough to survive unpolluted and form metal-free Pop III stars up to a redshift of z ~ 6–7 (when the universe was around 900 million years old)!

JWST is the perfect instrument to search for these systems. You can read other astrobites on the search for possible Pop III systems with JWST here and here. The authors of today’s article seek to develop the most efficient way of using JWST’s Near-Infrared Camera (NIRCam) to find the galaxies hosting Pop III stars. Using their selection method on existing NIRCam data, the authors identified one promising Pop III galaxy candidate.

I’m Not Like Other Galaxies

In order to find a Pop III galaxy, we need to take a look at galaxies’ spectral energy distributions (SEDs). These are graphs that show the energy emitted by a galaxy at different wavelengths of light. Pop III galaxies are expected to have SEDs that differ from your everyday, metal-enriched galaxy. NIRCam will be especially sensitive to three key spectral features that show up in the SEDs of Pop III galaxies: an absent [O III] line (light emitted by doubly ionized oxygen atoms), a strong H-alpha line (light emitted when a hydrogen atom transitions from its third to its second energy level), and a significant Balmer jump (light absorbed to ionize electrons in the second energy level of a hydrogen atom). To identify these key SED characteristics, the authors use SED fitting and color–color diagrams to execute an efficient Pop III search with NIRCam.

The first selection method involves SED fitting. Astronomers create template SEDs that represent different types of galaxies and then compare these templates to the observed SEDs to see which one matches best. In this work, the authors use metal-rich galaxy templates and Pop III templates to fit the galaxies observed with NIRCam. They then calculate the chi-squared χ² (a statistical measure of best fit) between the data and all the SED templates. A galaxy is selected as a Pop III candidate if the Pop III model provides a good fit (χ² < 10) to the photometry and is significantly better than any metal-rich model. It’s kind of like looking for Cinderella by making every woman in the kingdom try on the glass slipper.

A color–color diagram plots the difference in magnitude between two filters on each axis. NIRCam filters are specially chosen to emphasize the SED characteristics above. When these filters are chosen, Pop III galaxies occupy a distinct region of this diagram as compared to metal-rich galaxies. For example, subtracting the F356W filter from the F277W filter is sensitive to the presence of the [O III] line and the Balmer jump. Figure 1 demonstrates how this color selection separates Pop III galaxies from typical galaxies.

O Pop III, Pop III, Wherefore Art Thou?

The authors apply their fresh new selection criteria to publicly available NIRCam data from large surveys. And (drum roll please) the slipper fits! The Pop III galaxy candidate GLIMPSE-16043 is an ultra-faint galaxy at z = 6.5. It was imaged in the GLIMPSE survey, which uses the technique of gravitational lensing to observe faint and distant galaxies.

The GLIMPSE survey targeted a massive galaxy cluster, Abell S1063. The cluster bends the light from distant galaxies and, like a giant lens, magnifies faraway objects, providing some of the deepest JWST imaging to date. The Pop III candidate passes both tests: it resides in the Pop III region of the color–color diagram, and its SED is best fit by a Pop III model, not a metal-rich galaxy model (see Figure 2). Next, spectroscopic follow-up is needed to ensure that this galaxy is truly metal free and not just extremely metal poor.

The authors conclude that our best shot at identifying additional Pop III galaxy candidates is using NIRCam to image large numbers of gravitationally lensed clusters. Without magnification from gravitational lensing, it may be impossible to see these ultra-faint Pop III galaxies. Once candidates have been identified, they can be followed up with deep spectroscopy to confirm their redshift and their lack of metals. Who knows? With these new methods, we may soon get a glimpse of the universe’s very first stars.

Original astrobite edited by Chris Layden and Margaret Verrico.

About the author, Madison VanWyngarden:

I am a first-year PhD student in astronomy and NSF Graduate Research Fellow at the University of Arizona. I study galaxy formation and evolution in the distant universe and am particularly interested in dusty star-forming galaxies. In my free time, I love reading, hiking, and baking bread!

The post A Possible GLIMPSE of the Universe’s First Stars appeared first on AAS Nova.

Notice anything unusual about these galaxies? Each of the scenes above is crafted from observations from the Hubble Arp Galaxy Survey, which turned the talents of the Hubble Space Telescope toward 216 targets in the Arp and Arp–Madore catalogs. These catalogs contain galaxies that are visibly out of equilibrium, either caught in the middle of an interaction with another galaxy, sporting strange structures, or illuminated by brilliant starbursts. Julianne Dalcanton (Flatiron Institute; University of Washington), Meredith Durbin (University of Washington; University of California, Berkeley), and Benjamin Williams (University of Washington) designed the survey to create an archive of previously unobserved sources in these catalogs of peculiar galaxies. In addition to providing a new high-resolution view of these sources, the team hopes that the survey will serve as a launchpad for new investigations and complementary observations from facilities like JWST and the Atacama Large Millimeter/submillimeter Array. To learn more about the Hubble Arp Galaxy Survey and see more of the new images, be sure to check out the full article linked below.

Citation

“The Hubble Arp Galaxy Survey,” Julianne J. Dalcanton et al 2026 ApJS 283 25. doi:10.3847/1538-4365/adfc67

The post Featured Image: Disequilibrium on Display appeared first on AAS Nova.

Editor’s Note: Astrobites is a graduate-student-run organization that digests astrophysical literature for undergraduate students. As part of the partnership between the AAS and astrobites, we occasionally repost astrobites content here at AAS Nova. We hope you enjoy this post from astrobites; the original can be viewed at astrobites.org.

Title: Searching Within Galaxies for the Earliest Signs of Quenching With Spatially Resolved Star Formation Histories in UVCANDELS
Authors: Charlotte Olsen et al.
First Author’s Institution: New York City College of Technology
Status: Published in ApJ

How and Why Do Galaxies Stop Forming Stars?

Galaxies serve as important laboratories for many subfields of astrophysics. As such, astrophysicists are interested in the full galactic life cycle, from how galaxies are born to the end of their formation. Whereas young galaxies in the distant universe are actively forming stars, many nearby galaxies are much quieter, with little or no ongoing star formation. Astronomers like to describe these galaxies as “red and dead” because their stars are older and therefore appear redder in color. The process by which galaxies shut down their star formation is known as quenching, and it causes galaxies to become quiescent. Understanding the origin of quiescent galaxies is a fundamental question in galaxy evolution. Studying this process is challenging, however, because star formation is intertwined with many other factors that shape galaxies, including their environments and supermassive black holes.

Star formation occurs on scales that are much smaller and over timescales much shorter than the global properties and overall lifetime of a galaxy. By observing star formation on these smaller scales over time, astronomers can gain a clearer picture of how star formation ceases in a galaxy, and they can determine whether this process is driven from the inside out — starting with the supermassive black hole in the galactic center — or from the outside in, influenced by environmental effects. In today’s article, the authors use the Cosmic Assembly Near-Infrared Deep Extragalactic Legacy Survey with high-resolution ultraviolet coverage (UVCANDELS) to examine eight “golden” galaxies, shown in Figure 1. They then reconstruct the star formation histories within small regions of each galaxy to detect the “earliest signs of quenching.”

Characterizing the Star Formation Histories

To trace a galaxy’s star formation over cosmic time, today’s authors model its integrated light — which encodes the many episodes of past star formation — using spectral energy distribution (SED) fitting. By comparing a galaxy’s light across many wavelengths to computer models, SED fitting can estimate the ages of its stars and when they formed. This approach allows astronomers to study how a galaxy’s star formation rate evolves as a function of its stellar mass, known as the SFR – M_stellar relation. Note that the article considers the star formation rate and stellar mass in individual regions of each galaxy, so it analyzes these properties as surface densities, Σ_SFR and Σ_Mstellar, instead of the total values.

Using SED fitting, the authors determine the expected star formation rate and stellar mass of the regions from 250 million to 1 billion years before the time of observation. Figure 2 shows the line of best fit for the SFR – M_stellar relation of the regions for each galaxy, before and at the time of observation. The SFR – M_stellar relations are very similar across the sample 1 billion years before the observations; however, by the time of observation, the overall star formation rates have decreased slightly, indicating that the galaxies are beginning to quench. They also exhibit increased variation suggesting that each galaxy is quenching in a different way.

To further probe how these galaxies are starting to quench, the authors also measure the specific star formation rate (sSFR) of the regions as a function of their distance from the center of the galaxy. The sSFR can be thought of as the rate of new star formation relative to the amount of existing stellar mass: SFR /M_stellar. Figure 3 shows three examples from the galaxies studied in this work. Once again, the star formation rates of the regions decrease over the course of 1 billion years. However, the regions where the star formation rate has declined most rapidly differ from galaxy to galaxy — ranging from the central regions to the mid-disk to the outskirts — as each galaxy is undergoing a different quenching mechanism.

Detecting the Earliest Signs of Quenching

It should be noted that all of the galaxies in this study are still forming stars. However, they are on the verge of having their star formation suppressed, offering valuable insight into how quenching begins and how diverse the process can be. New telescopes are pushing the boundaries of what we can observe. On one hand, JWST can capture galaxies at exceptionally high resolution; on the other, the Vera C. Rubin Observatory and the Nancy Grace Roman Space Telescope will deliver vast datasets containing billions of galaxies. Future investigations leveraging these facilities could reveal more about the physical processes that quench galaxies on small scales, shedding light on the mechanisms that drive galaxy evolution.

Original astrobite edited by Catherine Slaughter.

About the author, Shalini Kurinchi-Vendhan:

After studying astrophysics and literature at Caltech, I moved onto a Fulbright Fellowship in Heidelberg, Germany. I’m passionate about using computer simulations to explore supermassive black holes and galaxy evolution — but I also love poetry and traveling.

The post Observing the End of Star Formation in Galaxies appeared first on AAS Nova.

JWST has uncovered a peculiar population of very distant objects known as “little red dots.” The mechanisms powering these objects’ peculiar properties — high luminosities, compact radii, and “V”-shaped spectra — remain uncertain. Could little red dots be the result of supermassive stars, galaxy mergers, or, as a recent study explores, black hole stars?

Direct-Collapse Black Holes and Little Red Dots

Since their discovery, little red dots have been the subject of many studies, but a complete explanation for their unique combination of properties remains elusive. Multiple studies have explored the growing population of peculiar dots, with some postulating that they are the result of stars thousands of times the mass of the Sun, supermassive stars entrenched in gas from a galaxy merger, or black holes embedded in dense accretion disks. 

Even more recently, studies have proposed that little red dots may be the remnants of direct-collapse black holes. In this scenario, a large cloud of gas in the early universe directly collapses into a stellar-mass black hole, and the remaining gas envelops the black hole, forming what is known as a quasi-star (or black hole star). Researchers have suggested that little red dots may be the late stage of this process when the black hole has accreted at least 10% of the total mass of the system. Direct comparisons between quasi-star evolutionary models and JWST observations of little red dots have yet to be explored but are necessary to confirm the potential of quasi-star origins.

Evolutionary Models of Quasi-Stars

Seeking to compare quasi-star evolutionary models to JWST observations of little red dots, Andrew D. Santarelli (Yale University) and collaborators developed a modeling framework to simulate quasi-star evolution. In this framework, a quasi-star is modeled as a black hole at the core of a massive star that accretes material from the stellar envelope over its lifetime. The authors computed models for a range of initial masses and tracked the evolution of the quasi-stars, predicting luminosities, temperatures, surface gravities, and lifetimes of these objects.

After a short initial phase of contraction lasting around 10,000 years, the quasi-star spends the rest of its approximately 20–40-million-year lifetime in the “late stage” as the central black hole continues to eat up the surrounding envelope. In the end, the quasi-star becomes a supermassive black hole a million times the mass of the Sun.

From these models, the authors extracted synthetic spectral energy distributions for late-stage quasi-stars. In comparing the simulated quasi-star spectra to those of three observed little red dots, the authors found that the synthetic quasi-star spectra generally reproduce the main continuum features seen in all three of the little red dots. While the models do not account for specific emission lines, the continuum slopes of the ultraviolet and near-infrared parts of the spectral energy distributions that form the signature “V” shape generally agree with those seen in the three comparison little red dots.

Plausible Progenitors

The results of this study indicate that late-stage quasi-stars can naturally produce the defining continuum features of little red dot spectra. While further modeling is required to trace specific emission line features, the initial modeling presented in this study establishes quasi-stars as plausible progenitors of not only little red dots but also the universe’s first supermassive black holes. 

As the authors noted, the short lifetimes of quasi-stars shown in their models in conjunction with the observed number density of little red dots implies that a significant fraction of supermassive black holes formed through this mechanism. Continued observations of little red dots and advanced modeling of direct-collapse black holes will aid in determining if these peculiar dots are showing off the birth of supermassive black holes in the universe.

Citation

“Evolutionary Tracks and Spectral Properties of Quasi-stars and Their Correlation with Little Red Dots,” Andrew D. Santarelli et al 2026 ApJL 998 L4. doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ae3713

The post Starring in the Early Universe: Black Hole Stars and Little Red Dots appeared first on AAS Nova.

This image from JWST shows the galaxy cluster XLSSU J021744.1-034536. The cluster is at a redshift of z = 1.98, placing it at cosmic noon, when the universe’s star formation was at its peak. To study the formation and evolution of this cluster, Zachary Scofield (Yonsei University) and collaborators collected wide-ranging clues, including signs of weak gravitational lensing, the glow of gas in between the galaxies of the cluster, and an analysis of the cluster members. The image above (click for the full view) indicates the galaxies that are members of the cluster. The brightest galaxy in the cluster is marked with a yellow square, and the remaining cluster members are circled, with the color indicating whether the galaxy’s cluster membership was assigned photometrically (magenta) or spectroscopically (green). Combining all available lines of evidence, Scofield’s team found that XLSSU J021744.1-034536 is undergoing a merger, giving a rare glimpse into this stage of cluster formation. To learn more about this work and what it tells us about galaxy clusters at cosmic noon, be sure to check out the full article linked below.

Citation

“An Active Galaxy Cluster Merger at Cosmic Noon Revealed by JWST Weak Lensing and Multiwavelength Probes,” Zachary P. Scofield et al 2026 ApJL 999 L1. doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ae447a

The post Featured Image: An Active Galaxy Cluster Merger at Cosmic Noon appeared first on AAS Nova.

Researchers show that the highly disrupted state of the Small Magellanic Cloud can be attributed to a long history of interactions with its neighbor, the Large Magellanic Cloud.

A Disrupted Dwarf Galaxy?

The Small Magellanic Cloud (SMC) is one of the largest and nearest satellites of the Milky Way. At a distance of just 200,000 light-years, the SMC has long been used as an accessible analog for low-metallicity star-forming galaxies in the early universe.

However, observations increasingly suggest that the SMC may not be an ideal analog for high-redshift galaxies. The SMC appears to have been disrupted: its gas seems to rotate while its stars do not, it has an unusually large line-of-sight depth compared to its extent on the sky, and its gas distribution has two peaks.

The source of this disequilibrium might be the Milky Way’s largest satellite, the Large Magellanic Cloud (LMC). As the SMC inches along its orbit around the Milky Way, it also engages in a gravitational dance with the LMC. These galaxies may be clumsy dance partners, with data suggesting a potential direct collision between the SMC and LMC within the past 200 million years.

Modeling the Magellanic Clouds

To understand how a potential collision between the Magellanic Clouds might have impacted the present-day properties of the SMC, Himansh Rathore (University of Arizona) and collaborators used hydrodynamical simulations to explore the interconnected histories of the SMC, the LMC, and the Milky Way.

At the beginning of the simulations, the SMC is in equilibrium, with its stellar and gaseous components neatly rotating in unison. From there, its fate diverged: in a control simulation, the SMC and LMC maintained a respectful distance, never getting less than about 100,000 light-years from one another. In the collision simulation, the galaxies collided 100 million years ago.

Both of these model scenarios reproduced certain features of the SMC–LMC system, such as the bridge of gas that spans the distance between them. Only the collision scenario, though, can explain the apparent discrepancy between the SMC’s stars and gas.

An Impactful Collision

Post-collision, the SMC’s stellar population is significantly elongated and features a tidal tail. If this tidal tail is oriented along our line of sight, it would explain why the galaxy’s depth in that direction is unexpectedly large. The presence of a gas tidal tail may also help to explain the two peaks in the galaxy’s gas density.

In terms of the galaxy’s rotation, only the stars nearest the SMC’s center rotate, while the rest move radially outward, swayed by the tidal pull of the LMC. This radial motion is also present in the galaxy’s gas. While previous work has interpreted the observed velocity dispersion of the SMC’s gas as a sign of rotation, Rathore’s team showed that radial expansion, viewed from an inclined angle, can mimic a rotational signature. 

The team also showed that the gas is far more disturbed than the stars, reflecting the pressure exerted by the LMC’s gas when the two galaxies collided. This type of interaction can transform an irregular dwarf galaxy into an ellipsoidal or spheroidal dwarf galaxy — a transition that Rathore’s team argues is underway for the SMC.

Ultimately, these simulations demonstrate that the SMC is a profoundly disrupted galaxy, likely still reeling from a recent collision with its larger neighbor. Viewing the SMC through this lens is critical to understanding its role as an analog to early universe galaxies.

Citation

“A Galactic Transformation — Understanding the SMC’s Structural and Kinematic Disequilibrium,” Himansh Rathore et al 2026 ApJ 1000 50. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ae4507 

The post Disrupted Dwarf Galaxy: Investigating the History of the Small Magellanic Cloud appeared first on AAS Nova.

Editor’s Note: Astrobites is a graduate-student-run organization that digests astrophysical literature for undergraduate students. As part of the partnership between the AAS and astrobites, we occasionally repost astrobites content here at AAS Nova. We hope you enjoy this post from astrobites; the original can be viewed at astrobites.org.

Title: The z = 7.08 quasar ULAS J1120+0641 May Never Reach a “Normal” Black Hole to Stellar Mass Ratio
Authors: Meredith A. Stone et al.
First Author’s Institution: University of Arizona
Status: Published in ApJ

The first galaxies in the universe emerged out of an archaic age of darkness. Like luminous factories, they started rapidly churning out stars, spilling light into the cosmos. This process of star formation continues to the present day. In some galaxies, it occurred at astonishing rates, with the equivalent of thousands of times the mass of the Sun being assembled into stars in a single year. At other times, it came to a slow crawl, with all fresh reserves of star-building gas seemingly exhausted. Yet when the gears of star formation ground to a halt, certain events were able to send them spinning again.

One of the most spectacular of these is a merger, a train-wreck collision between two galaxies. Images of these events are often breathtaking, showing arms of light twisting together and vast stellar streams being violently cast away. Mergers directly increase the stellar mass (the mass of all stars) of galaxies by combining two into one. The intense gravitational interactions between the galaxies involved can also disrupt stagnant pools of gas, igniting a new burst of star formation. Thus, interactions between galaxies can be a significant driver of their growth.

Sometimes, a reservoir of matter is driven toward the center of a galaxy due to a “secular” process (one that occurs without external intervention) or from a merger. At the galactic nucleus, the infalling streams of matter encounter a supermassive black hole. The matter falls into a swirling accretion disk, heating to extreme temperatures and furiously glowing. If the black hole is massive enough and the gas falls in quickly enough, the accretion disk can outshine all of the stars in the galaxy, and we call such a source a quasar. The intense radiation produced by a quasar can impact the entire rest of the galaxy, either suppressing the formation of new stars or sometimes igniting it.

Thus, a galaxy has an important role in the growth of its central supermassive black hole, and vice versa. This connection manifests in complicated ways. Most strikingly, it is thought to be the cause of the correlation between a galaxy’s stellar mass and its central black hole mass. In the nearby universe, galaxies have stellar masses around a thousand times greater than their black hole masses. JWST, our most powerful tool for investigating early galaxies, has given us unprecedented insight into whether this holds up in the distant universe. Though the jury is still out, many researchers are convinced that the answer is a resounding no. We’ve found distant black holes that appear to be nearly equal in mass to their host galaxies, something that’s unfathomable in the local universe.

However, this raises a key question. Black holes and their galaxies grow together, and they started on nearly equal footing. So why do all of the galaxies in the nearby universe appear so much more massive than their black holes? Today’s article underscores this puzzle, pushing it to the breaking point. The authors examine a well-studied quasar, ULAS J1120+0641 (hereafter J1120), which we see as it appeared just 750 million years after the Big Bang. This source has a supermassive black hole containing an astounding 20% the mass of its host galaxy. The shocking part is that, even after carefully accounting for all of the ways this galaxy could grow in the future, there appears to be no way for J1120 ever to reach “normal” proportions.

Through the Looking Glass, ULAS J1120

First, the authors analyze the key observations of J1120 obtained to date. In addition to observations from JWST, this source has been targeted by some of the most powerful astronomical facilities, including the Hubble Space Telescope (optical and near-ultraviolet), the Chandra and XMM-Newton observatories (X-rays), the Atacama Large Millimeter/submillimeter Array (radio/millimeter), and numerous other ground-based telescopes. This incredible dataset provides a detailed picture of J1120 across the electromagnetic spectrum, spanning X-rays to radio emission.

The authors compare various measurements of the black hole’s mass and find that multiple methods yield a similar result of about a billion and a half times the mass of the Sun. Turning to the host galaxy, they estimate the mass of the visible stars, which is more complicated than it sounds — you can’t exactly count them, since the enormous distance between us and J1120 causes it to appear as just a fuzzy blob. They combine this mass with the mass of newly forming stars that are buried in dust and obscured from our view. The mass of a nearby galaxy that’s actively merging with J1120 is added to this sum. Finally, the authors compute how many stars could form in the future from all of the gas left in the galaxy, and they throw this into the total.

Even with all of these components, the host galaxy would only be 10 times more massive than the black hole at the center. This ratio is a far cry from the factor of a thousand we expect for normal galaxies in the local universe!

A Train Wreck of Train Wrecks

Well, if one merging galaxy won’t do it, what if J1120 merges with literally every single other nearby galaxy? The authors use new JWST data to count all sources near the quasar (Figure 1) and measure their stellar masses. Going further, they estimate how many galaxies their technique may have missed and add all of these to the pile. Not done yet, they finally conclude by making a rough approximation of how much loose gas is in these nearby galaxies, and compute how much extra mass could exist in stars born from this fresh material. Assuming that J1120 survives the full-frontal assault, being battered by mergers from each of its neighbors in turn, its total stellar mass would grow by quite a large factor.

What’s the final result? Shockingly, even after all of this growth, the stellar mass of J1120 would still only be about 40 times that of the central black hole. That’s 25 times less than we’d expect from a nearby galaxy! Even if the black hole never grows again, it appears that this galaxy will never reach “normal” proportions. So why is it that, when we look around at the local universe, there’s nothing like J1120? The authors point out that galaxies near J1120 would be missed by their methods if they are obscured by thick shrouds of gas and dust. Such sources would increase the estimated mass that could be contributed by mergers. On the other hand, maybe J1120 will adopt the strategy of the blue whale, filter feeding on the extremely sparse matter between galaxies, yet growing to enormous proportions.

A fascinating final possibility is that galaxies like this one do exist in the nearby universe. With their black hole switched off, all we would be able to see is a relatively small package of stars. Place such an object far enough away, and we might miss it entirely! Whether galaxies like J1120 achieved normal proportions through unknown mechanisms or are lurking in the far fringes of the local universe, studies like this one shine light on the amazing connection between black holes and their host galaxies. In the future, they will be one key piece in the puzzle of the endlessly complicated past of our own galaxy and the universe at large.

Original astrobite edited by Will Golay.

About the author, Ansh Gupta:

I’m an astronomy graduate student at the University of Texas at Austin working with Steven Finkelstein. I use data from JWST to study the formation and growth of the first galaxies and black holes in the universe. In my spare time, I enjoy playing piano, reading, and making YouTube videos.

The post Forever Alone: A Black Hole Destined to Stay Too Big appeared first on AAS Nova.

The smallest satellite of the Milky Way, Ursa Major III/UNIONS 1, has posed a mystery since its discovery. Is this smattering of stars a dwarf galaxy or a star cluster?

The Milky Way’s Mysterious Companion

In 2024, researchers discovered a small group of stars orbiting the Milky Way at a distance of about 33,000 light-years in data from the Ultraviolet Near Infrared Optical Northern Survey (UNIONS). This collection of stars amounts to just 16 solar masses and shines with only 11 times the Sun’s luminosity, making it 4–5 times less massive than the next faintest Milky Way satellite.

Considering its small stellar population and small size (its half-light radius is 10 light-years, which is typical for a globular cluster), this satellite appeared at first glance to be an ordinary star cluster. But early data also suggested that the stars had an unusually high velocity dispersion, which could mean that they are nestled within a dense and massive dark matter halo — making the satellite not a star cluster but a dwarf galaxy.

Reflecting this uncertainty, the satellite has two names: Ursa Major III (its dwarf galaxy designation) and UNIONS 1 (its star cluster classification). Can new data clear up the confusion?

New Dispersion Data

In a recent research article, William Cerny (Yale University) and collaborators described new observations of 16 stars in Ursa Major III/UNIONS 1 with the Keck II telescope.

Crucially, these measurements enabled a new estimation of the system’s velocity dispersion. In contrast to earlier work that found a high velocity dispersion of 3.7 km/s, the new data favor a value of just 0.1 km/s and rule out values above 2.3 km/s. While these results do not unequivocally preclude the possibility of dark matter, they strongly favor little to no dark matter. This goes against the initial evidence in favor of the dwarf galaxy hypothesis.

These observations also helped to confirm one candidate binary pair and identify three new binary candidates. (This large binary fraction, though interesting, isn’t diagnostic, as both star clusters and dwarf galaxies are known to host high proportions of binary stars.)

Further Evidence

Cerny’s team conducted a further test of the Ursa Major III/UNIONS 1’s identity by measuring the metallicities of its 12 brightest stars. They found that the stars are metal poor and have little metallicity dispersion. This finding again points to a star cluster, in which stars form in a single epoch, rather than a dwarf galaxy, which may feature multiple generations of stars with different degrees of chemical enrichment.

Based on the newly collected evidence, Cerny and collaborators concluded that Ursa Major III/UNIONS 1 is likely a star cluster, though the possibility that it’s instead a dwarf galaxy could not be ruled out. If the star cluster classification holds, Ursa Major III/UNIONS 1 would be the least luminous metal-poor star cluster known. This classification may also imply the presence of a large number of compact objects — white dwarfs, neutron stars, or black holes — to keep the cluster intact, filling the role that dark matter would have played.

Going forward, further chemical abundance measurements of Ursa Major III/UNIONS 1 may still sway the argument one way or another. And as facilities like the Vera C. Rubin Observatory and the Euclid space telescope continue to collect data, other extreme Milky Way satellites may come to light.

Citation

“No Observational Evidence for Dark Matter Nor a Large Metallicity Spread in the Extreme Milky Way Satellite Ursa Major III/UNIONS 1,” William Cerny et al 2026 ApJL 999 L8. doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ae29b8

The post Ursa Major III/UNIONS 1: Dwarf Galaxy or Star Cluster? appeared first on AAS Nova.

Giant low-surface-brightness galaxies are rare and unusual members of the galactic menagerie. They host the largest galactic disks currently known, have baryonic masses of order 100 billion solar masses, and sport narrow, tightly wound spiral structures. The origins of these vast galaxies — they can be up to 10 times larger than the Milky Way — are unknown, though various theories involving mergers, accretion, and strange dark matter halos exist. Research also suggests that there may be a connection between these galaxies and compact ellipticals, which are small, dense, and contain old stars. In a recent article, a team led by Anna Saburova (Sternberg Astronomical Institute) investigated two giant low-surface-brightness galaxies with compact elliptical companions. In the image above, the colored circles represent the oxygen abundance at each location in AGC 192040 (left) and UGC 1382 (right). The red arrows point to the compact elliptical companions. Using the chemical abundance information to investigate possible formation mechanisms, Saburova and collaborators found that the two galaxies likely formed in different ways. UGC 1382 appears to be the result of multiple mergers, while AGC 192040 may have accreted gas from its halo or a galactic filament before undergoing a merger of its own. To learn more about this study of two rare galaxies, be sure to check out the full research article linked below!

Citation

“MUSE Study of Two Giant Low-Surface-Brightness Galaxies with Compact Satellites,” Anna S. Saburova et al 2026 ApJ 998 19. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ae3139

The post Featured Image: Rare Giant Galaxies appeared first on AAS Nova.

Small galaxies are expected to have even smaller companion galaxies, according to current cosmological models. A recent study takes a look at one dwarf galaxy and finds more tiny companions than anticipated. 

Cosmology Predicts Satellite Galaxies

Critical to our understanding of dark matter and galaxy formation, satellite galaxies are small, faint galaxies surrounding a larger host galaxy. The leading cosmological model, known as lambda cold dark matter (ΛCDM), predicts dark matter halos of all masses to host smaller dark matter subhalos whose luminous counterparts make up satellite galaxies. 

While the satellite systems of Milky Way-like galaxies are well characterized, the companions of dwarf galaxies are less well studied. Despite being significantly smaller, dwarf galaxies should also host even smaller satellites galaxies around them. These satellites push the limits of observations — extremely faint and hard to distinguish from background sources, dwarf galaxy satellites require innovative imaging techniques to discover. 

In recent years, new surveys have identified a number of satellites around dwarf galaxies that appear broadly consistent with ΛCDM predictions, though the sample size is still small. Continuing the search for little galaxies’ little galaxies is critical to testing the ΛCDM framework and will further our understanding of galaxy formation on the smallest scales. 

Searching for Satellites Around DDO 161

Diving into a specific system, a team led by Jiaxuan Li (李嘉轩) from Princeton University began an in-depth search for satellites around the dwarf galaxy DDO 161. Prior to this study, DDO 161 was known to have one companion, UGCA 319, that is about 10 times smaller than its host. 

The authors used data from the Legacy Surveys to search for satellites within about 400,000 light-years of DDO 161 — the expected reach of DDO 161’s gravitational influence. After removing bright sources and smoothing the image to bring out very faint objects, they found eight satellite galaxy candidates including UGCA 319.

To confirm if these candidates were actual satellites of DDO 161, the team performed follow-up observations of the seven unconfirmed sources with the Magellan 6.2-meter telescope. Using the surface brightness fluctuation technique — measuring how a galaxy’s light fluctuates from pixel to pixel to determine its distance — the authors confirmed that three of the candidates are located at a similar distance to DDO 161 and are likely satellites. With the previously confirmed companion UGCA 319, DDO 161 has four satellite galaxies with stellar masses above 250,000 solar masses, making it the most satellite-rich dwarf galaxy known to date. 

Too Many Satellites

How does DDO 161 compare to theoretical predictions for galaxies of its size? The authors ran cosmological simulations to quantify the expected satellite populations around galaxies of similar size to DDO 161. Just as it is an outlier observationally, DDO 161 is also an outlier when compared to the simulation results that predicted fewer satellite galaxies in similarly massive host systems. 

Making sure to cover all bases, the authors considered their observational uncertainties, limitations of the simulations, different relationships between stellar and dark matter halo mass, and possible environmental effects. None of these checks could, at this point, sufficiently explain the satellite overabundance in DDO 161, introducing a possible “too-many-satellites” problem for this galaxy. A larger sample of satellites around dwarf galaxies is necessary to better understand this discrepancy, test our current cosmological framework, and give new insight into galaxy formation on small scales. 

Citation

“A Possible ‘Too-many-satellites’ Problem in the Isolated Dwarf Galaxy DDO 161,” Jiaxuan Li et al 2026 ApJL 998 L24. doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ae3ddd

The post Satellite Surplus Around Dwarf Galaxy DDO 161 appeared first on AAS Nova.

Editor’s Note: Astrobites is a graduate-student-run organization that digests astrophysical literature for undergraduate students. As part of the partnership between the AAS and astrobites, we occasionally repost astrobites content here at AAS Nova. We hope you enjoy this post from astrobites; the original can be viewed at astrobites.org.

Title: Episodic Feedback in Triple Active Galactic Nucleus Candidate SDSS J0849+1114 Revealed by Extended Ionized Gas
Authors: Xiaoyu Xu (许啸宇) et al.
First Author’s Institution: Nanjing University
Status: Published in ApJ

When Galaxies Collide

Galaxies are social creatures; they interact and merge (more astrobites talking about this are here and here)! When galaxies collide, the gravitational chaos acts like a funnel, driving massive amounts of cold gas toward the center. This gas rush has two major consequences: it triggers intense bursts of star formation (known as starbursts), and it feeds the central supermassive black holes, activating them as active galactic nuclei (AGNs).

But the story doesn’t end there. These powerful AGNs don’t just sit and feast on the gas. They launch high-velocity winds or jets that push back against the incoming gas, a process known as AGN feedback. (Read more about it in Astrobites here and here.) This feedback is thought to be the key mechanism by which supermassive black holes regulate their host galaxies, either by heating and expelling the gas (negative feedback, which starves star formation) or, in some cases, by compressing it (positive feedback, which promotes star formation).

While binary AGNs (two AGNs in one merging system) are rare, finding systems with three AGNs in one system is fascinatingly rare. The galaxy SDSS J0849+1114 (J0849+1114) is one such system, featuring three Seyfert 2 AGNs, a type of active galaxy with a bright, compact nucleus whose spectrum shows only narrow emission lines, within a tight region of about 5 kiloparsecs (kpc) or 16,000 light-years. Studying this system gives us a front-row seat to how multiple black holes interact and regulate their host environment during a complex merger. Very Large Array observations reveal that nucleus A (see Figure 1) contains two jets, inner and outer. In contrast, nucleus C has one jet, providing further evidence for the presence of an AGN.

Peering into the Triple Core with VLT/MUSE

To understand the gas dynamics in J0849+1114, the authors used the Very Large Telescope (VLT) and its Multi-Unit Spectroscopic Explorer (MUSE) instrument. MUSE is an integral-field spectrograph, meaning it provides spectra for every single spatial pixel (or “spaxel”) across the field of view. This allows astronomers to map not just where the light is coming from, but how the gas is moving and what is causing it to glow, all resolved spatially across the galaxy.

The main technique employed was two-component Gaussian fitting of key emission lines like hydrogen alpha (Hα) and ionized oxygen ([O III]λλ4959,5007), which can be seen in Figure 2. The width of a Gaussian line (or its velocity dispersion) in a spectrum tells us how fast the gas is moving. A narrow line means the gas is relatively calm, with most of it moving at similar speeds. A broader line, on the other hand, means the gas velocities are more spread out — some parts are racing toward us, others away — indicating turbulence or outflows. By comparing the widths of different components, astronomers can separate quiet, rotating gas from the high-speed winds launched by the active black holes.

What They Found: Gas Tails and Outflows

The VLT/MUSE observations successfully characterized both the undisturbed (First Component) and turbulent (Second Component) gas across the system.

1. Galactic-Scale Tidal Tails

The slow-moving gas (First Component) revealed extended structures of ionized gas stretching over 10 kpc (33,000 light-years), and in some directions, even more than 15 kpc (49,000 light-years) away from nucleus A. These large, low-velocity gas clouds align well with features known as tidal tails: the stretched-out arms of gas and stars pulled away by the violent gravitational forces of the merger.

2. Two Distinct Outflows Driven by Radio Jets

The fast-moving gas (Second Component) clearly showed two distinct sites: outflows originating from nucleus A and nucleus C.

• Outflow A: This outflow extends over 5 kpc (16,000 light-years) around nucleus A. The gas kinematics and geometry strongly suggest that this outflow is being driven by nucleus A’s radio jet. This finding is key, as the measured kinetic power of the outflow is about 10 times stronger than what star formation alone could supply, and the current luminosity of the AGN is also insufficient to power it.
• Outflow C: A smaller but detectable outflow extends about 5.9 kpc (19,000 light-years) around nucleus C, with a lower kinetic power compared to Outflow A. But, like Outflow A, the energetics and velocity gradients suggest this outflow is also linked to nucleus C’s radio jet.

A Black Hole That’s Recently Gone Quiet

The most striking implication of this study relates to the timing of nucleus A’s activity. The presence of extended ionized gas far from the nucleus (in the tidal tails, >10 kpc or 33,000 light-years away) provides a fascinating glimpse into the AGN’s recent past.

The physical conditions of this distant gas were determined using emission line ratios ([O III]/Hα and [N II]/Hα) on the Baldwin, Phillips, and Terlevich (BPT) diagram. A BPT diagram uses emission line ratios to diagnose the energy source that ionizes the gas: star formation, AGN, or shocks. The BPT diagram of J0849+1114 indicates that an AGN currently photoionizes the gas.

By running sophisticated photoionization models, the scientists calculated how luminous nucleus A must have been to ionize the gas currently found 10–15 kpc (33,000–49,000 light-years) away. They discovered that this required nucleus A to be 20–100 times more luminous than it currently is! Since light takes time to travel, and the ionized gas quickly recombines (on timescales of less than 100 years for this gas), this luminous phase must have ended very recently, approximately 30,000–50,000 years ago. This is a long time for us, but just a blink of an eye on cosmic timescales.

The Episode of Self-Regulation

By integrating the findings across different wavelengths and timescales, the current faint luminosity state, the past luminous state inferred from the distant gas, and the presence of radio jets of different ages, the authors propose a model of episodic AGN feedback in nucleus A:

1. Past Activity (150,000 years ago): An active phase likely launched an outer radio jet, which subsequently drove the large-scale ionized gas outflow observed today.
2. Peak Ionization (30,000–50,000 years ago): A subsequent burst of high accretion reached its peak, ionizing the distant tidal tails.
3. Fading and Quenching (Today): The energy released by the jet and/or outflow during the active phase likely expelled or heated the surrounding gas (negative feedback), causing the central accretion disk to run out of fuel. The AGN has since faded rapidly to its current low-accretion state, marked by the appearance of a young inner radio jet.

A Quiet Ending After a Loud Beginning

J0849+1114 is not just a statistical anomaly as a triple AGN candidate; it serves as a crucial case study demonstrating the powerful and rapid effects of AGN feedback. High-resolution observations confirm that violent galaxy mergers trigger both powerful outflows and episodic bursts of extreme luminosity. Crucially, these outflows clear the gas and cause the central supermassive black hole to quickly fade from a luminous quasar phase to a quiet, low-accretion state within tens of thousands of years. This system provides strong, spatially resolved evidence that AGN feedback rapidly suppresses accretion onto the supermassive black hole and shapes the host galaxy on kiloparsec scales during the chaotic drama of galactic mergers.

Original astrobite edited by Lindsey Gordon.

About the author, Sowkhya Shanbhog:

I am currently a first-year PhD student at Scuola Normale Superiore in Pisa, Italy, where I am focusing on studying high-redshift quasars. Prior to this, I completed a dual BS-MS degree at the Indian Institute of Science Education and Research in Pune, India. Now, I am eager to expand my involvement in science communication and outreach initiatives. I have recently developed an interest in cooking, particularly since moving to a new city. I find solace in listening to music during my leisure time.

The post A Triple Black Hole System Caught in the Act of Self-Quenching appeared first on AAS Nova.

New research uses distant sources to investigate a question close to home: how the Milky Way replenishes its supply of star-forming gas.

Dynamic Galaxies

In photographs, galaxies often appear static and isolated, surrounded by nothing but the blankness of space. This picture is deceiving: galaxies across the universe are dynamic, constantly compressing gas into new stars, expelling gas through supernovae and galactic winds, and replenishing their star forming material by channeling gas from cosmic filaments, accreting clouds from their galactic halos, or collecting previously expelled gas as it rains back down.

This interplay of inflowing and outflowing gas has important implications for a galaxy’s ability to form stars; without a way to resupply, galaxies would soon run out of star-forming gas. In a research article published this week, astronomers investigate one channel through which our own galaxy maintains its supply of star-formation fuel.

Quasars Lend a Hand

To learn more about how the Milky Way collects and incorporates new star-forming material, a team led by Hannah Bish (Space Telescope Science Institute; University of Washington) studied the low-velocity gas flowing into and out of our galaxy at the disk–halo interface. This interface is a transitional region in which gas from the Milky Way’s expansive, diffuse halo is incorporated into the disk, where it can condense into stars.

To study gas at the disk–halo interface, Bish’s team enlisted the help of some of the universe’s most luminous objects: quasars. A quasar is a bright, compact galactic center powered by accretion of gas onto a supermassive black hole. When the light from these distant, brilliant beacons passes through gas clouds like those enveloping the Milky Way, the composition, temperature, and velocity of the gas clouds leaves a spectral fingerprint on the light from the quasar.

Complex Inflows and Outflows

The team used spectra of 132 quasars and ground-based measurements of neutral hydrogen to identify and disentangle the motions of gases with different temperatures and compositions. Along 67% of the lines of sight, Bish and collaborators found evidence for both inflowing and outflowing gas, suggesting that these processes occur simultaneously.

They also found differences between inflows in different locations within the galaxy as well as for gas of different temperatures; in the Milky Way’s southern hemisphere, gas of all temperatures and coming from all directions flows inward at 5–10 km/s. In the northern hemisphere, things are more complicated: cooler gas flows inward at 5–10 km/s, while warmer gas streams toward our galaxy much faster. This trend also varies with location, appearing only in certain directions.

Bish’s team explored these results using a simple model of the Milky Way, which they found could largely reproduce the behavior in the southern hemisphere, but not the more complicated findings from the northern hemisphere. They suggested that the difference in behavior between the cooler and warmer gas could be evidence that accretion in the northern hemisphere occurs in patches, and that warm inflowing gas is piling up and cooling where it collides with denser gas at the disk–halo interface.

Looking forward, Bish’s team anticipates that high-resolution models — and more quasar observations to constrain those models — will be key to uncovering the causes of this curious behavior.

Citation

“Differential Accretion of Ionized Low-Velocity Gas at the Milky Way’s Disk–Halo Interface,” Hannah V. Bish et al 2026 ApJ 997 230. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ae2741

The post Fueling Up: How Does the Milky Way Get Its Star-Forming Gas? appeared first on AAS Nova.