Apple HomeView costs £299 in the UK, C$429 in Canada and A$449 in Australia, according to Apple’s online stores in those countries, and the new Apple TV 4K (4th generation) costs exactly the same in each of them. Both are $299 in the U.S., and both arrive on Friday, November 13. HomeView is sold in […]
Three little letters - bnb-side’s name is a play on the local b-side arts festival, but Silicon Valley colossus sees threat to global brand
In one corner is bnb-side, a six-room bed and breakfast on the Isle of Portland – a tiny wedge of limestone tied by a narrow ribbon of shingle to the Dorset coast – that was created to help secure the future of the rock’s much-loved arts festival, b-side.
On the other is Airbnb, the San Francisco-based booking colossus. The battle between them is over the three little letters they share.
iPhone prices are drawing attention ahead of Wednesday’s launch, with U.S. estimates placing the iPhone 18 Pro around $1,250 to $1,300, the Pro Max around $1,350 to $1,400, and the foldable Ultra above $2,000. Those expectations build on reports of a new premium price tier for the foldable iPhone, but the figures circulating under Vodafone’s name need closer examination.
Vodafone Egypt has denied that the alleged pricing leak came from its operation. In a September 4 correction, PhoneArena reported the carrier’s response and acknowledged that it could not verify the material.
The American price estimates and the overseas carrier claims come from different sources. Apple has not announced U.S. retail prices for any of these devices.
U.S. iPhone Prices Could Rise Across the Pro Lineup
For American buyers, the most useful figures are the estimates expressed directly in U.S. dollars. Current reporting on the projected Pro prices places the iPhone 18 Pro between $1,249 and $1,299 and the iPhone 18 Pro Max between $1,349 and $1,399.
Those ranges reflect expectations built around TrendForce’s pricing outlook. They are possible starting prices before applicable sales tax, rather than authenticated carrier listings or amounts Apple has approved publicly.
The foldable has a wider potential spread. In its September 3 forecast, TrendForce estimated a starting price between $2,099 and $2,299, with the highest configurations potentially exceeding $3,000.
The firm expects price increases of roughly 10% to 20% for the new models as rising memory costs put pressure on production expenses. It also expects Apple to absorb some of those costs to protect demand.
An increase in component spending does not translate directly into the same increase at checkout. Apple can accept a smaller margin, negotiate elsewhere in the supply chain, or distribute the increase differently across models and storage configurations.
The exact starting capacities will therefore deserve attention alongside the prices. A more expensive entry model that includes additional storage presents a different comparison from an unchanged configuration carrying a higher charge.
Image Credit: AppleMagazine
Australian Ultra Claim Converts to About $2,700
The separate Australian claim would put the entry iPhone Ultra at approximately $2,700 when converted into U.S. dollars. The original amount is AU$3,699 for a purported 256GB model.
The same claim lists a 512GB version at roughly $3,000 in converted value, with an original price of AU$4,199. The alleged 1TB model approaches $3,400, corresponding to AU$4,699. These rounded equivalents provide context for the overseas figures; they are not predicted American retail prices.
The post also names September 12 as the preorder date. Neither that date nor the claimed Australian pricing has been authenticated through a public carrier announcement.
The proposed storage structure adds about $360 in converted value at each step, or AU$500 locally. If accurate, that would make storage selection a substantial part of the purchase rather than a minor addition to the headline price.
A buyer planning to record large amounts of video or carry a substantial offline library could quickly move into a more expensive configuration. Comparing an entry Pro with a fully equipped Ultra would then combine two separate premiums: the folding hardware and the extra capacity.
The Egyptian Figures Are Disputed
The alleged Egyptian listing translates to approximately $1,930 for the iPhone 18 Pro, $2,070 for the Pro Max, and a little over $3,000 for the Ultra, using the conversions reported when the claim circulated.
The original figures were EGP 98,000, EGP 105,000, and EGP 155,750, respectively. Vodafone Egypt’s denial means these amounts cannot be presented as prices confirmed or leaked by the carrier.
A recognizable logo and local currency can make a screenshot appear convincing. They do not establish that a company published it, that its contents are authentic, or that the amounts represent final retail pricing.
For U.S. buyers, this material offers no dependable basis for changing an upgrade budget. Its main relevance is explaining where some of the unusually high numbers appearing online originated.
Image Credit: AppleMagazine
Currency Conversions Can Exaggerate U.S. Expectations
An overseas price converted into dollars answers what that amount of foreign currency is worth. It does not reveal what the same product will cost in an American store.
Tax treatment contributes to the difference. Australian consumer prices generally include GST, while U.S. advertised prices typically exclude sales tax. Regional pricing also reflects currency planning, distribution expenses, and commercial decisions.
Removing tax and applying an exchange rate still would not produce an official American price. Companies set regional prices for a selling period, rather than adjusting them continuously to match daily currency movements.
The same limitation applies when comparing percentage differences with an older phone. Assuming that the Ultra will carry an identical premium over the Pro in Australia, Egypt, and the United States introduces another unverified step.
That is why the direct U.S. estimates deserve priority when considering a purchase here. The international claims can provide additional context, but they should not replace an American price forecast or be mixed into it as supporting confirmation.
The Ultra Premium Creates a Different Buying Decision
If the projected U.S. ranges hold, the foldable could cost roughly $700 to $950 more than the Pro Max at entry level. That is a substantial amount to spend on a different form factor.
The larger internal display would need to earn its place in everyday use. Reading documents, comparing information, reviewing photographs, and working with more content on screen could make the extra space valuable. Someone primarily interested in photography, messaging, and navigation may find fewer reasons to make the jump.
The most expensive device also will not automatically be the best choice in every category. Camera versatility, battery endurance, weight, and comfort can favor different designs. Those comparisons will become more useful once Apple publishes complete specifications.
For a first-generation foldable, repair pricing deserves particular attention. An attractive monthly device payment can look different once accidental-damage protection and display service costs enter the ownership budget.
Carrier Offers Will Need Their Own Comparison
Apple’s September 9 event announcement confirms a presentation at 10 a.m. Pacific Time. Product pricing, availability, and ordering details remain separate from that confirmed schedule.
When American carrier offers appear, the monthly figure should be read together with the requirements attached to it. A promotion may depend on an eligible trade-in, a particular service plan, or credits distributed across an extended agreement.
A household already using the required plan might receive substantial value. Someone moving to a more expensive plan solely to obtain a phone discount could spend more over the full term.
The final comparison should use the same storage capacity and include the upfront payment, service cost, financing charges, and any credits lost by leaving early. A smaller payment on the device line of the bill does not necessarily produce a smaller total bill.
The MacVoices Live! panel dives deep into Apple’s across-the-board price increases, weighing rising RAM, storage, inflation, shareholder obligations, and product value. Chuck Joiner, David Ginsburg, Brian Flanigan-Arthurs, Ben Roethig, Eric Bolden, Marty Jencius, Jeff Gamet, Norbert Frassa, Jim Rea, and Web Bixby debate whether higher prices are a short-term reset or the new normal, how buyers may react, why the MacBook Neo increase stings, and whether refurbished or education pricing may become more important.
RAM production capacity at Samsung Electronics, SK hynix, and Micron Technology is reportedly committed through the end of 2027, leaving consumer electronics manufacturers with little room to secure additional memory outside existing supply agreements.
Industry reports indicate that the three dominant manufacturers have allocated their available DRAM and high-bandwidth memory production for next year. Long-term contracts with cloud companies, AI chip developers, automakers, and device manufacturers have effectively reserved the output those suppliers expect to produce.
The claim does not mean every RAM module that will be sold in 2027 has already been manufactured or purchased by a consumer. It refers to future production capacity being assigned to customers before the chips leave the factory.
It also does not cover every memory producer worldwide. Chinese manufacturer ChangXin Memory Technologies, known as CXMT, and several smaller suppliers continue to produce DRAM. However, Samsung, SK hynix, and Micron control most of the advanced global DRAM market, making their available capacity the primary constraint for companies such as Apple.
RAM Production Is Already Committed
Selling out a year of production capacity means manufacturers have received enough contractual commitments to allocate the output they expect from their factories. Customers may have reserved specific volumes, product types, or manufacturing capacity under agreements that include minimum purchases and pricing protections.
Micron has been shifting toward this model through strategic customer agreements. The company disclosed 16 multiyear deals covering customers across data centers, consumer devices, automotive products, and industrial equipment.
Those agreements typically run for several years and include binding volume commitments. Some use fixed prices, while others establish price floors and ceilings. Micron has said that its signed contracts represent approximately $100 billion in expected revenue over their remaining terms.
Such agreements give memory manufacturers more predictable revenue than the traditional DRAM cycle, in which aggressive expansion frequently created excess supply and collapsing prices. They also give large buyers assurance that chips will be available for planned products.
The disadvantage falls on customers that did not reserve enough capacity early. A company needing more memory than its contract provides may have to pay higher prices, accept a different specification, delay production, or find another qualified supplier.
SK hynix CEO Kwak Noh-jung has described 2027 as potentially the worst year in the memory industry’s history from a supply perspective. He expects customer demand to remain above the company’s production capacity beyond 2030, despite major investments in new factories.
Samsung has issued a similar warning, expecting the constraints to become more severe in 2027 and continue into 2028. Analysts at UBS have projected that the DRAM market could remain undersupplied until at least the second quarter of 2028.
Image Credit: Bloomberg / Getty Images
AI Memory Consumes More Factory Capacity
The shortage originates primarily from the rapid expansion of artificial intelligence infrastructure. AI accelerators require high-bandwidth memory, or HBM, to move large amounts of data between memory and processors at extremely high speeds.
HBM and the LPDDR memory used in Apple devices are different products. An iPhone or Mac is not competing directly for the same finished memory package installed beside an Nvidia AI accelerator.
They still depend on overlapping manufacturing resources. HBM begins with advanced DRAM dies, and producing a given capacity of stacked HBM consumes considerably more wafer output and packaging resources than conventional memory. Suppliers have also concentrated spending, equipment, and engineering work on the more profitable AI segment.
Every production line converted or optimized for HBM can reduce the industry’s flexibility to make standard server DRAM, PC memory, or mobile LPDDR. New investment may increase total memory output while doing little to relieve the parts of the market serving phones and personal computers.
Cloud companies are willing to enter multiyear agreements and make large financial commitments because a shortage of memory can leave costly AI processors unused. Memory manufacturers therefore have a powerful incentive to prioritize these customers over consumer device companies seeking lower component prices.
The pressure is also moving beyond HBM. AI servers need large quantities of conventional DDR5 memory, while storage systems supporting model training and inference consume enterprise NAND flash. This spreads the shortage across several categories that were previously less exposed to AI infrastructure spending.
Apple Faces Expensive Supply Decisions
Apple purchases enormous volumes of LPDDR memory for the iPhone and iPad, along with memory used across the Mac, Apple Watch, Vision Pro, Apple TV, and HomePod product families. Its size gives it substantial negotiating power, but it cannot purchase capacity that suppliers have already assigned to other customers.
The company has acknowledged that memory prices are continuing to rise. Tim Cook recently characterized the pricing environment as a “hundred-year flood” and said Apple expects to pay more for memory during the September quarter.
Apple has already raised prices across several Mac and iPad models while reducing or removing some high-memory Mac configurations. Although memory availability is not the sole influence on every product decision, eliminating configurations can help a manufacturer concentrate limited components around the models expected to sell in larger volumes.
The design of Apple silicon makes memory allocation especially sensitive. Unified memory is integrated closely with the processor package and cannot be upgraded after purchase. Apple must decide how many chips to secure for each configuration long before customers begin ordering those machines.
A shortage can therefore affect more than the cost of an individual RAM component. It can influence base memory capacities, upgrade pricing, the number of configurations offered, production volume, and the timing of product introductions.
Apple can absorb part of the increase through its margins, negotiate longer agreements, adjust retail pricing, or redesign its product mix. Each option carries a cost. Absorbing higher prices reduces profit per device, while passing them to customers could weaken demand. Restricting configurations risks pushing professional users away from Macs that no longer offer enough unified memory.
The company is reportedly evaluating DRAM from CXMT for products sold in China. Adding a fourth major source could improve access to conventional memory, but qualification takes time because Apple must confirm performance, reliability, manufacturing consistency, and compatibility with its hardware.
The political environment creates another obstacle. US lawmakers have raised national security concerns about American companies purchasing memory from Chinese semiconductor manufacturers. Apple could consequently find that a supplier is technically suitable for China-market products but difficult to introduce across its international supply chain.
Sold Out Does Not Mean Stores Will Be Empty
The reported capacity commitments do not guarantee a universal shortage of finished devices. Apple and other major manufacturers will still receive memory under agreements they have already negotiated.
Products can also continue reaching stores while component prices rise. Manufacturers may reduce discounts, increase retail prices, limit premium configurations, or give priority to their most profitable devices before allowing a shortage to stop production completely.
Contracted capacity can change if customers reduce orders or if AI infrastructure investment slows. Memory makers could redirect production between customers and product categories, although converting lines and qualifying different chips cannot happen immediately.
CXMT could also expand faster than expected, particularly in mainstream DRAM. Its products have reportedly attracted interest from HP, Asus, Acer, Dell, Lenovo, and Apple as established suppliers devote more resources to AI memory. CXMT is unlikely to replace the combined output of Samsung, SK hynix, and Micron during 2027, but it may provide an alternative for products sold outside the United States.
New production facilities offer little immediate relief. Semiconductor factories require construction, equipment installation, process development, yield improvement, and customer qualification before reaching dependable volume.
Micron expects the first wafer output from its initial new Idaho facility around the middle of 2027, with a second facility following in late 2028. Those first wafers will still need to pass through the production ramp and customer qualification process, leaving much of their effect on available device memory for 2028 and later.
Live, rolling coverage as London’s biggest companies defy Middle East disruption and UK petrol prices rise to around £1.60 per litre, the highest since Donald Trump ordered renewed strikes
The story piquing the interest of the financial press this morning is that of Leopold Aschenbrenner, the AI Wunderkind (he’s German-born) who has been forced to sell off his fund in a fire sale after the AI boom ran out of steam.
The 24-year-old had persuaded a lot of people to give him a lot of money for a hedge fund, after previously working for OpenAI and the FTX Future Fund, a charitable arm of the fraudulent crypto empire of Sam Bankman-Fried, who is now in prison. Aschenbrenner ploughed that money into debt-fuelled bets on artificial intelligence companies, earning huge returns until he found out that stocks can also fall.
The trader dubbed the “Nostradamus of AI” would have been hard-pressed to foresee how quickly his high-flying hedge fund would run into trouble.
The firm’s rapid downward spiral is a familiar tale, as Silicon Valley and Wall Street once again threw their weight behind a bright-eyed but untested investor who promised this time would be different. “Everybody always wants to find the next golden child,” said one longtime hedge fund executive. “It just keeps happening.”
In less than 24 hours — which included a conversation between Griffin and Aschenbrenner — Griffin’s Citadel hedge fund reached out to Situational Awareness and snapped up the investments at a discount, according to a person familiar with the matter who asked not to be identified citing private information.
It was a startling reversal for Aschenbrenner, a former researcher at OpenAI who – before starting his hedge fund roughly two years ago — had no previous investment experience. His fledging firm has watched its assets plunge from $45bn at the start of July to about $10bn.
MacBook Neo helped Apple move against the global PC market in the second quarter of 2026, delivering double-digit Mac shipment growth while most leading computer manufacturers sold fewer units than a year earlier.
Preliminary data from IDC estimates that Apple shipped 6.7 million Macs during the quarter, up 10.1% from 6.1 million in Q2 2025. Its worldwide market share rose from 8.5% to 9.9%, placing the company within a fraction of the 10% threshold.
The rest of the industry moved in the opposite direction. Global shipments fell 4.9% year over year to 68.2 million units, ending nine consecutive quarters of growth. A separate Omdia estimate placed the decline at 3.6% and Apple growth at 15.9%, but both research groups identified the same pattern: the Mac gained ground while established Windows PC vendors contracted or remained flat.
IDC directly connected the Apple increase with the arrival of its lowest-priced notebook. MacBook Neo began shipping in March, giving the model its first complete quarter of retail availability between April and June.
MacBook Neo Drives Mac Shipment Growth
MacBook Neo entered the market as an alternative for buyers previously priced out of the Mac lineup.
The 13-inch notebook launched at $599 with an A18 Pro chip, 8GB of unified memory, a Liquid Retina display and up to 16 hours of video playback. It also brought macOS, Apple Intelligence and integration with the iPhone ecosystem into a price range commonly occupied by mainstream Windows laptops and Chromebooks.
That positioning attracted students, families and first-time Mac customers who did not need the performance or display technology of a MacBook Air or MacBook Pro. The four-color aluminum design also gave the entry model a more recognizable identity than the older Mac notebooks that frequently remained on sale through discounts.
IDC had already identified the computer as an unusual source of strength when it revised its notebook forecast earlier in 2026. Demand exceeded initial expectations in several markets, and reported inventory shortages appeared shortly after the March launch.
The effect became much more visible in Q2. MacBook Neo was available for the entire three-month period, allowing Apple to increase production, expand retail distribution and serve customers who could not obtain the computer during its first weeks.
The entry model also widened the Mac lineup without replacing the MacBook Air. Buyers seeking more memory, faster ports, longer wireless web use or additional external-display support could continue moving toward the M5-powered Air, while the less expensive machine handled education, office work, web browsing and communication.
That separation allowed Apple to reach lower price points without reducing the value of its premium notebooks.
Image Credit: Apple Inc.
Lenovo, HP and Dell Lose Shipments
Apple remained the fourth-largest traditional PC vendor, but its performance contrasted sharply with the companies above it.
Lenovo retained first place with 16.6 million units and 24.4% market share. Its shipments declined 2.1% from the previous year.
HP experienced the steepest drop among the top five, falling 9% to 13 million units. Dell shipped 9.3 million computers, representing a 5% decline. Asus remained nearly flat at 5 million units, up only 0.2%.
Manufacturers outside the five largest brands collectively suffered a 10.5% contraction, indicating that weaker demand and component inflation placed even more pressure on smaller companies.
The figures measure shipments into distribution channels or directly to end users, not confirmed retail purchases by individual consumers. A manufacturer can therefore record shipment growth while some inventory remains unsold in stores or warehouses.
MacBook Neo demand appears to have been strong enough to support Apple production increases rather than simply filling channels. The company reportedly doubled its annual production target after the initial response, although later quarters will reveal how much of Q2 reflected lasting demand rather than launch-period enthusiasm.
Apple also benefits from operating at a scale that provides leverage with memory, storage and semiconductor suppliers. Smaller PC brands face greater difficulty securing components at competitive prices when shortages intensify.
Memory Costs Reverse the PC Recovery
The Q2 contraction arrived after manufacturers and commercial customers accelerated purchases during late 2025 and early 2026.
Buyers expected memory and storage prices to rise, encouraging some businesses to replace computers earlier than planned. Vendors also increased inventories while components remained available.
That activity supported nine quarters of market growth but borrowed demand from later periods. Once the early purchases were completed, the industry faced a more difficult combination of expensive components, cautious consumers and elevated retail prices.
The memory shortage is closely connected to the AI infrastructure boom. Chipmakers are dedicating more production capacity to high-bandwidth memory used by data center accelerators, limiting the supply of conventional DRAM needed for personal computers.
IDC expects little relief before the end of 2027 or early 2028. The research company forecasts an 11.3% decline in worldwide PC shipments across 2026, with the fourth quarter potentially falling 20% from the previous year.
Computer revenue may not decline at the same pace. Manufacturers have raised prices faster than shipments have fallen, allowing them to collect more money from fewer units.
That strategy creates another problem. Retailers and distributors can become trapped with expensive inventory if customers refuse the new prices, forcing promotions or production reductions later.
MacBook Neo initially softened that pressure by giving Apple a new product near the bottom of the notebook market. Its original $599 price made the Mac competitive with midrange Windows machines at the moment many rivals were becoming more expensive.
Image Credit: Freepik
The Price Increase Creates the Next Test
The strongest Q2 MacBook Neo shipments were recorded while most customers could still buy the computer at its introductory price.
Apple raised the U.S. starting price to $699 in late June as memory and storage costs affected the Mac and iPad lineups. The education price remained at $599, preserving the original offer for eligible students and educators.
A $100 increase changes the comparison with discounted Windows notebooks and places the entry model closer to older MacBook Air configurations available through third-party retailers.
Apple must now determine whether the appeal came primarily from the low launch price or from the combination of macOS, battery life, design and iPhone integration.
The company remains better positioned than many rivals to absorb supply disruption, negotiate long-term component agreements and promote several notebooks at different prices. MacBook Neo also uses an iPhone-class A18 Pro processor rather than an M-series chip, providing another way to manage silicon costs and production capacity.
IDC expects the full PC market to deteriorate during the second half of 2026. Apple will enter that period with almost 10% worldwide share, but the September quarter will be the first to measure MacBook Neo demand almost entirely at the higher $699 retail price.
Exclusive: Mining giant says technology is not yet advanced enough to run a fully electrified fleet but experts say it is hooked on federal fuel tax credits
BHP has continued to spend hundreds of millions of dollars buying diesel trucks in the Pilbara despite internal documents suggesting it would increase emissions and be “misaligned” with its decarbonisation goals.
The mining giant is Australia’s biggest consumer of diesel and trucks are its biggest single source of diesel emissions. Replacing the fleet with battery-electric trucks is considered a critical step in the multinational’s efforts to decarbonise.
Login
