Since the formation of the Earth 4.2 billion years ago, hot rock from the interior of the planet has cooled off and developed crystals that accumulated over millions of years, forming surface rocks with a layered composition, referred to as continental crust. Geologic evidence of how continental crust formed comes from large, ancient crustal blocks, called cratons. Cratons have existed for billions of years and form the cores of continents. 

Scientists have shown that the upper 10 to 15 kilometers (6 to 9 miles) of continental crust contains high concentrations of elements like uranium and thorium that decay and release heat over time, referred to as radiogenic elements. However, the lower 20 kilometers (12 miles) of crust has very few radiogenic elements. The cause of this planetary-scale differentiation is highly questioned, as geoscientists don’t know what formation processes could produce this unique characteristic. 

Earlier researchers suggested that changes in the concentration of radiogenic elements could occur when tectonic plates collide. Plate collision induces temperatures in the lower crust high enough to melt minerals that contain uranium and thorium, like zircon and monazite. The newly melted minerals form magma, which then rises and crystallizes in the upper crust. To test whether this process formed the layered continental crust, researchers Andrew J. Smye and Peter B. Keleman incorporated geochemical data from studies worldwide into a mathematical model comparing how concentrations of radiogenic elements vary under different temperatures. 

The team separated their global analyses into 2 categories of rocks that were buried deep in the crust and subjected to intense pressures and temperatures, via a process known as metamorphism. The first category included rocks formed from the accumulation of eroded grains buried in the deep crust that are subjected to high pressures and temperatures, called metasedimentary rocks. The second category included rocks formed when magma rises from the deep Earth and solidifies before experiencing high pressures and temperatures, called metaigneous rocks.

The researchers analyzed 3 subcategories from each of the 2 types of deep-crustal rocks. The first was rocks that experienced no intense pressure or temperature, the second was rocks subjected to 650 to 900°C (about 1,200 to 1,650°F), and the third was rocks subjected to 900 to 1,100°C (about 1,650 to 2,000°F). The researchers modeled the geochemistry of the 3 rock types at different temperatures to determine whether ultra-high-temperature metamorphism could cause crustal differentiation of radiogenic elements.

Smye and Keleman found that monazite doesn’t melt in either metasedimentary or metaigneous rocks at temperatures below 900°C, as indicated by the relatively high thorium content in these deep-crustal rocks. Alternatively, they found that above 900°C, uranium and thorium concentrations decreased in metasedimentary rocks, suggesting that minerals like zircon and monazite were melting. The melted minerals enter magma and rise into the upper crust, leaving behind metasedimentary rocks depleted in radiogenic elements by around 0.10 ppm.  

The team concluded that the enrichment of uranium and thorium in the upper continental crust requires temperatures greater than 900°C to initiate the melting of zircon and monazite in the lower crust. Temperatures above 900°C are linked to the movement and collision of continental plates. This result suggests that evidence of Earth’s differentiation has been preserved for more than 3 billion years, spanning most of the planet’s geological history. Since stable continental crust formed, uranium and thorium enrichment in the upper crust has consistently recorded layering produced by ultra-high temperature metamorphism.

The post Why is Earth’s crust layered? appeared first on Sciworthy.

About 400 million years ago, the population of plants with vein systems for transferring water and nutrients, called vascular land plants, exploded. Soon thereafter, rocks from some continental magmas showed notable shifts in their chemical compositions. Geologists have suggested that these magma changes happened worldwide, but some argue that the data might be biased because some geographic regions have more samples to analyze than others. A new research team recently tested whether these magmatic changes occurred on a global scale, versus in isolated mountain belts or volcanic islands. 

Geologists use the chemistry of rocks formed from magma to understand a magma’s history. In particular, a mineral called zircon that forms from cooling magma preserves chemical clues about where the magma came from and what it interacted with. To test whether magma changes were global or local, the authors needed data ranging from the equator to the poles. Continents have shifted over the past 400 million years, so scientists use the latitude a rock had when it formed, called its paleolatitude, to compare samples from different parts of ancient Earth. To understand magma histories worldwide, the team used publicly available chemical data from zircons in magmatic rocks that formed across a wide spread of paleolatitudes.

Chemical elements with the same number of protons but different numbers of neutrons are called isotopes with different masses. To discern how plants influenced magma, the researchers analyzed 2 different isotope signals preserved in the zircons. The first isotope signal comes from the ratio of the heavy to light oxygen isotopes, which increases when sediment mixes into magma. Scientists refer to this value as δ¹⁸O, pronounced “delta 18-O.” 

The second isotope signal comes from the element hafnium, denoted Hf. Geologists use hafnium to estimate how long ago magmas melted and separated from the mantle. Zircon contains 2 Hf isotopes, one of which is stable and one of which is produced by radioactive decay. Because this decay happens over billions of years, the ratio between the 2 Hf isotopes over time shifts only slightly. Geologists express these tiny differences using a shorthand called εHf, pronounced “epsilon hafnium,” which shows how much a magma’s Hf signature has changed from Earth’s original mantle. Lower εHf values indicate magmas that incorporated older crustal rock, while higher εHf values reflect mantle sources.

The researchers found that δ¹⁸O values increased as εHf values decreased in these zircons. They concluded that this trend indicates increasing amounts of land-derived sediment in magmas, corresponding with the evolution of land plants. They suggested that land plants altered the ancient landscape, changing how sediments weathered and moved over land. 

To explore this pattern in detail, the team focused on the Andes Mountains, a region that preserves a long history of magmatic activity across a long span of space and time. Using a database, they accessed isotope data from zircon samples collected in the Andes Mountains by dozens of other research groups. These samples covered 32 degrees of modern latitude and 520 million years of Earth’s history, offering a broad window into how magma chemistry changed during that time.

They found that zircons older than 450 million years had no relationship between their εHf and δ¹⁸O values. However, in zircons younger than 450 million years, δ¹⁸O increased as εHf decreased. The researchers saw this pattern in magmas that formed along the edge of the continent, where one tectonic plate sinks below the other, called a subduction zone. They also saw this pattern in magmas that formed inland, away from the subduction zone, around 200 million years ago during the breakup of the supercontinent Pangaea.

 They found similar results in published zircon isotope data from igneous rocks in China, the Caribbean, Antarctica, Madagascar, and Tasmania. Zircons from each region showed the same relationship as zircons in the Andes. Since paleolatitude can also reflect ancient climate, the researchers compared the ratio of εHf and δ¹⁸O, written as εHf/δ¹⁸O, with paleolatitude to test whether ancient climate zones influenced magma chemistry. They found no link between paleolatitude and εHf/δ¹⁸O. 

With these results in mind, the researchers concluded that the relationship between εHf and δ¹⁸O shifted worldwide after vascular land plants evolved. They argued that as plants spread across the continents, their roots accelerated the breakdown of rocks. This accelerated weathering produced large amounts of sediment that washed into ocean basins and was eventually subducted into the mantle, forever changing the chemistry of magma formed there. They suggested that this chain of events illustrates how life on Earth’s surface can drive changes deep within the planet. 

The post Plants changed the chemistry of magmas appeared first on Sciworthy.