Waterfalls play an essential role in river development and landscape evolution. Researchers are particularly interested in how abrupt changes in the steepness of a river channel, also called knickpoints, develop. Knickpoints vary in size and can be as small as your index finger or as large as Niagara Falls. Researchers from Virginia hypothesized that waterfalls, a type of knickpoint, can influence erosion when a river channel is cut into solid rock, called bedrock. 

The researchers wondered whether fractures and other pre-existing weaknesses can influence how water removes rock slabs from a river channel, via an erosional process called plucking. Fractures can form in many different orientations, but the researchers focused on 3. Imagine a flat tabletop that represents a riverbed. Fractures that are parallel to the flat tabletop are called horizontal fractures. If you tip the table so the low end points downstream, that’s the direction of downstream-dipping fractures. If you tip the table so the low end points upstream, that’s the direction of upstream-dipping fractures. 

First, the researchers tested how fracture orientation changed erosion before an established knickpoint. They used a man-made channel, called a flume, to simulate a natural river system. To set up the experiment, they glued layers of small tiles about the size of an adult’s thumbnail to a plastic frame and put it in the flume. Then, they placed a layer of unglued tiles upstream of the knickpoint. 

To begin the experiment, the researchers incrementally increased the amount of water flowing through the flume every 5 minutes until they reached a maximum flow or all the loose tiles were “eroded.” They considered a tile to be “eroded” once it was transported over the knickpoint and downstream. The researchers measured the water depth at a fixed point upstream of the knickpoint, the number of tiles eroded through plucking, and the volume of water. They repeated this 8 times for each fracture orientation.

The team found differences in the amount and timing of erosion between the 3 orientations. In particular, they saw that erosion began at lower water speeds for horizontal beds than for tilted beds. Based on the observed erosion rates, they concluded that horizontal beds are the most susceptible to erosion, while upstream-dipping beds are the most resistant, and downstream-dipping beds fall between the 2. 

The researchers then tested how a knickpoint would develop and influence water flow if all of the tiles were unglued and free to move. They individually stacked almost 5,000 unglued tiles across the channel. Before starting the experiment, they filled the flume slowly with water to submerge all of the tiles without moving them. Then, they increased the water’s speed to start erosion. Instead of collecting measurements as they did in the first experiment, the researchers filmed this experiment and observed how the knickpoint shape changed and how plucking occurred. 

The researchers observed that the plucked tiles in this experiment formed piles downstream of the knickpoint in a process known as armoring. This armor of tiles, which represents loose rocks near a waterfall in a natural setting, prevents erosion of the underlying river bed. Only when the water transports the armor downstream can it erode the bedrock and develop a knickpoint.

Unlike the first experiment, researchers found no differences in erosion between fracture orientations in this experiment, but did observe differences in armoring. They found that upstream-dipping beds had the least armoring because water quickly transported piles of tiles near the waterfall downstream. Downstream-dipping beds had the most armoring, and their eroded tiles took longer to move downstream. 

The team concluded that waterfalls will erode at different rates based on their fracture orientation and armoring processes. The orientation of bedrock fractures also impacts the shape of the waterfall and the river channel around it. So the next time you see a large waterfall, consider that it may have started as a small fracture the size of your thumbnail.

The post Bedrock fractures shape waterfalls appeared first on Sciworthy.

The evolution of land plants about 450 million years ago altered many of Earth’s geologic processes, like weathering and erosion. Due to the lack of evidence for meandering rivers before then, past scientists hypothesized that plants could have caused straight rivers to meander. However, in recent decades, researchers have challenged this idea. They’ve suggested that plants could have changed rivers without causing them to meander.

To understand how vegetation changed rivers in the past, researchers recently studied 49 modern meandering rivers. They sorted these rivers into 3 categories – vegetated, unvegetated, and semi-vegetated – by analyzing color images taken of them from the air. They identified 18 vegetated rivers located in South America, 24 unvegetated rivers in the western United States, and 7 semi-vegetated rivers in China and the Eastern United States. 

To examine the impact of plants on these rivers, the researchers quantified how much each river channel curves, known as its sinuosity. They used opposite banks of each river bend to find its center point, then, using digital maps, drew a line along the river’s trajectory at an equal distance between the bend center points. They used this line to calculate the angle between the river’s curve and the center point. This angle, called the migration angle, shows how a river bend relates to the river’s downstream direction. By measuring it, researchers can tell whether a river is developing more vertically or horizontally, and how sharp its bends are, either of which could be influenced by plants. 

The researchers compared migration angles across each river system to determine how river bends varied between vegetated and unvegetated rivers. They found that vegetated rivers tend to deposit sediments in the river bend, leading to curvier bends that develop horizontally and widen over time. In contrast, unvegetated rivers deposit sediment downstream, which means the rivers bend less and have greater variability in bend width.

The question remained whether plants were the primary cause of these differences or whether other factors were at play. To resolve this, the researchers investigated 3 additional factors. The first was the natural fluctuations in water flow across a river system, called its flow variability. They found that during storms, flow variability caused river bends to move downstream in unvegetated rivers, but not in vegetated rivers. This result suggested that flow variability alone didn’t drive downstream migration, although it can directly impact vegetation. 

The second variable the researchers analyzed was the amount of sediment a river can carry, or its sediment flux. They found that rivers carrying more sediment can erode more banks, also shifting river bends. However, rivers with more sediment but the same level of plant coverage had statistically similar bend angles. Thus, the researchers concluded that sediment flux alone can’t drive bend development, and that the changes were instead dependent on vegetation cover. 

The third variable they analyzed was riverbank strength. The researchers observed rivers with strong banks, made of rock or compacted sediment, and weak banks, made of loose sediment. They observed no difference in river bends with the same vegetation cover but different bank strengths. The researchers concluded that bank strength is also not the primary driver of bend migration in vegetated or unvegetated rivers. 

Of the 4 variables the researchers examined – flow variability, sediment flux, bank strength, and vegetation cover – vegetation cover consistently had the greatest impact on the appearance of meandering rivers. They concluded that meandering rivers could have existed before plants, but would have looked different. Like modern unvegetated rivers, ancient meandering rivers likely had lower-angle bends. As plants evolved and grew on river banks, the bends would have developed differently, becoming curvier like modern vegetated rivers. They suggested that understanding this process provides insight into life on Earth before plants evolved 450 million years ago. 

The post How did land plants change rivers? appeared first on Sciworthy.