A neutron star is what remains after the core of a massive star collapses. It is not a small ordinary star. It is the crushed core of a dead one, compressed until protons and electrons are forced together and most of the material becomes neutrons. The result is one of the strangest objects in the […]

The post What Is a Neutron Star? The City-Sized Remnant of a Stellar Explosion appeared first on Curiosmos.

Empty space is not completely empty in the equations of quantum physics. Under an ordinary magnetic field, that distinction is impossible to notice. Near a magnetar—a neutron star with a magnetic field trillions of times stronger than Earth’s—space itself can alter the way light travels. NASA’s Imaging X-ray Polarimetry Explorer (IXPE) has measured unusually strong […]

The post A Magnetar May Have Bent Empty Space—NASA’s IXPE Tests a 90-Year-Old Prediction appeared first on Curiosmos.

Neutron stars are composed of some of the most extreme material in the universe, and their internal properties are challenging to determine. Recently, researchers investigated an unusual spectral feature that may help to probe the interiors of neutron stars.

Examining Extreme Matter

When a massive star expires in a supernova explosion, it can leave behind its condensed core in the form of a neutron star: an exceptionally dense sphere roughly as wide as Manhattan is long, composed almost entirely of neutrons. Neutron stars represent an extreme state of matter and contain some of the densest and strongest material in the universe.

By observing neutron stars, astronomers attempt to pin down their equation of state, or the relationship between their interior density and pressure. In a recent research article led by Rosario Iaria (University of Palermo) described a promising way to probe the interior of a neutron star.

This method relies on measurements of a spectral line that originates near the neutron star’s surface and is gravitationally redshifted as it escapes from the intense gravitational pull of the star. The gravitational redshift provides a direct measurement of the compactness of the neutron star, or the ratio of its radius to its mass. Despite the promise of this method, definitive identification of gravitationally redshifted absorption lines has been challenging.

Directly Measuring Compactness

Iaria’s team identified potential evidence of this phenomenon in Neutron star Interior Composition Explorer (NICER) observations of 4U 1820-30, a close binary system containing a neutron star that is accreting matter from a white dwarf companion. (4U 1820-30 is famous for having one of the most rapidly rotating neutron stars known, with a blistering rate of 716 rotations per second.)

Iaria and collaborators focused on a strong iron absorption line at 3.8 keV, which arose three hours after a carbon superburst: a rare burst of high-energy radiation from thermonuclear burning of carbon deep in the neutron star’s atmosphere. The signal persisted for nearly 17 hours before subsiding.

The team proposed that the rare superburst paved the way for the gravitationally redshifted absorption line to appear. During the superburst, a powerful radiation-driven wind swept away most or all of the neutron star’s corona, a diffuse cloud of plasma floating above and below the accretion disk. After the superburst ended and the wind subsided, but before the obscuring corona reformed, the tell-tale absorption line was visible for a short time.

Cracking the Mystery of Neutron Star Structure

By interpreting the 3.8 keV absorption feature as a gravitationally redshifted spectral line arising near the neutron star’s surface, Iaria and collaborators measured a redshift of 1 + z ≅ 1.72. This corresponds to a compactness of 4.46 kilometers per solar mass, which translates to a radius of 6.4 km for a typical mass of 1.4 solar masses or a mass of 2.2 solar masses for a typical radius of 10 km.

The interpretation of the 3.8 keV absorption line as a gravitationally redshifted iron line is still tentative. Further measurements with NICER, or with future facilities like the Advanced Telescope for High-ENergy Astrophysics (Athena) X-ray observatory (planned launch in 2037) or the enhanced X-ray Timing and Polarimetry (eXTP) mission (planned launch in 2030), may help to advance the study of neutron star interiors using this technique.

Citation

“A Mysterious Feature in the NICER Spectrum of 4U 1820-30: A Gravitationally Redshifted Absorption Line?” R. Iaria et al 2026 ApJ 998 58. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ae2758

The post A Mysterious Spectral Feature Could Help Crack the Case of Neutron Star Structure appeared first on AAS Nova.

Researchers have recently discovered a number of ultra-long-period pulsars that are difficult to explain with typical pulsar models. A new article explains how these pulsars might arise from massive stars in close binary systems.

Strangely Slow Sources

When massive stars go supernova, the explosion can leave behind the condensed stellar core in the form of a neutron star. Neutron stars that spin rapidly become pulsars, whose fast rotation powers beams of radio emission along the star’s poles.

Until not too long ago, pulsars appeared to have periods no longer than 12 seconds. Above that “sluggish” rotation rate, researchers suggested, pulsars could no longer produce electron–positron pairs and channel them along polar magnetic field lines to generate their characteristic radio signals.

So it seemed, until unexpectedly slow pulsars began to crop up. The first trend-breaking pulsars had periods of a few dozen seconds, and objects with pulse periods of minutes or hours have now been found. What could these strange objects be?

Neutron Star Origin Story

In a recent article led by Savannah Cary (University of California, Berkeley), researchers proposed that these strange radio sources are pulsars, but pulsars that rotate slowly and have magnetically powered (rather than rotationally powered) radio emission.

The proposed origin story for these ultra-long-period pulsars begins with a binary system containing a massive star and a close stellar companion. As the massive star evolves, it transfers its outer layers to the companion and expires as a stripped-envelope supernova that births a rapidly spinning neutron star. As the supernova ejecta crashes into the companion star, the star heats up and expands to 5–100 times its original radius.

Meanwhile, the explosion delivers a ferocious kick to the newborn neutron star, likely unbinding the binary system. This sets the neutron star on a new course that could take it through the puffed-up outer layers of its former companion, where it may collect gas from the star and ejected material from the supernova into an accretion disk.

Slowing Down

Cary’s team explored the outcomes of this scenario with a trio of simulations: hydrodynamical models for the shock heating of the companion star, numerical models for the formation of the disk around the neutron star, and analytical models for the interaction between the disk and the neutron star.

For a binary system containing stars of 6.4 and 4.0 solar masses and a separation of 20 solar radii — values drawn from observations and simulations — the resulting unbound neutron star collects a disk in 8–10% of cases. The neutron star’s mass, radius, rotation rate, and magnetic field strength determine whether the neutron star and the disk will interact. If they don’t, the neutron star remains rotating rapidly like a typical pulsar. If they do, the neutron star’s rotation will slow to a relative crawl over about a million years. For modest magnetic fields between 10¹³ and 10¹⁴ Gauss, this means rotation periods in the realm of 10² seconds, whereas stronger magnetic fields, above 10¹⁵ Gauss, yield periods of roughly a day.

This work suggests that close binary systems could be the source of ultra-long-period pulsars, of which Cary’s team estimates there may be 10–1,000 in the Milky Way. Future work will explore this possibility further, examining broader swaths of parameter space to learn more about how this scenario could contribute to the population of ultra-long-period pulsars in our galaxy.

Citation

“Accretion from a Shock-Inflated Companion: Spinning Down Neutron Stars to Hour-Long Periods,” Savannah Cary et al 2026 ApJ 996 141. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ae1d43

The post Supernovae, Shocks, and Spindown: A Possible Origin Story for Ultra-Long-Period Pulsars appeared first on AAS Nova.

Editor’s Note: Astrobites is a graduate-student-run organization that digests astrophysical literature for undergraduate students. As part of the partnership between the AAS and astrobites, we occasionally repost astrobites content here at AAS Nova. We hope you enjoy this post from astrobites; the original can be viewed at astrobites.org.

Title: Supernova-Induced Binary-Interaction-Powered Supernovae: A Model for SN2022jli
Authors: Ryosuke Hirai (平井遼介) et al.
First Author’s Institution: RIKEN Pioneering Research Institute, Monash University, OzGrav: The ARC Centre of Excellence for Gravitational Wave Discovery
Status: Published in ApJ

There are thousands of dying stars that go bang in the night. These explosions are known as supernovae, and they are classified primarily on what spectral lines they show in the days and weeks following their initial explosion. Most broadly, they are separated into Type I (spectra that show little or no evidence of hydrogen) and Type II (spectra that show hydrogen). The physics leading to each type of supernova is different, and astronomers use all of the information at their disposal to learn about these cosmic fireworks.

One of the most useful tools for monitoring and learning about a supernovae is its light curve — the plot of the explosion’s brightness over time. This light curve usually appears as a steep incline up to a peak in brightness several days after the initial detonation, and then a shallow decline in brightness over the following weeks. There are, however, a few examples of supernovae that break this mould.

Today’s article seeks to understand the curious case of supernova SN2022jli. Unlike the typical gradual fade in brightness, the light curve of this supernova shows a periodic bump of brightness every 12.5 days (see Figure 1). The proposed mechanisms to explain this include the blown-apart supernova material interacting with concentric and regularly spaced shells of circumstellar matter, or a binary companion that interacts with the supernova remnant each orbital period. The authors of today’s article investigate the latter scenario by running 3D hydrodynamical simulations of an interacting, post-supernova binary to try to recover SN2022jli’s periodic light curve and constrain the orbital characteristics of the system.

The authors only have the supernova’s light curve to go off of, so they explore a range of orbital scenarios to explain SN2022jli. They run a series of models evolving a neutron star — the degenerate core left over after a low-mass supernova — together with a main-sequence stellar companion, varying the orbital eccentricity and companion mass, while fixing the orbital period (at the observed 12.5-day oscillatory period) and neutron star mass to 1.4 solar masses — a typical mass for a newborn neutron star.

Why a neutron star? SN2022jli is a sub-class of Type I supernovae involving a “stripped” massive star which has lost its hydrogen — most likely through interactions with a close companion. These interactions typically circularise the pre-supernova orbit, and the subsequent explosion most commonly yields neutron stars. To explain the necessarily highly eccentric post-supernova orbit that may cause the periodic oscillation in SN2022jli, there was most likely a “natal kick” — a sudden and asymmetric burst during the supernova that rockets the neutron star in a random direction — which widened the orbit and de-circularised it, giving further evidence for a neutron star remnant.

Immediately following the supernova explosion, ejecta interacting with the main-sequence companion star would heat the star and cause it to swell up. This inflated companion then feeds matter to the orbiting dense neutron star, and the accretion is most intense when the stars are closest in their orbit (called the periastron). During accretion, however, mass is not perfectly absorbed onto the neutron star, and there is some feedback onto the surrounding gas due to the complex thermal and magnetic physics around the neutron star. In this study, the authors model cases where there is no feedback, feedback from thermal radiation due to accretion, or feedback from bipolar outflows via jets or disk winds. Snapshots from the simulation involving a 5-solar-mass companion on an orbit with eccentricity of 0.5 and bipolar feedback is shown in Figure 2.

The authors evolve the simulation for several orbits and show that periodic bursts of accretion onto the neutron star are capable of producing the oscillatory behaviour seen in SN2022jli’s light curve. The scale of the brightness oscillations are best recreated if the plane of the binary’s orbit is aligned with our line of sight (shown with the +x red line on the right side of Figure 1). Still, the profile of the undulations is not exactly reproduced by the model, and the outcome is very sensitive to our viewing angle of the binary orbit.

SN2022jli is just one of an emerging class of oscillatory supernovae, with more and more being discovered with highly sensitive modern all-sky surveys. Today’s authors rigorously modelled one proposed scenario to explain this periodic oscillation in brightness and showed that it is viable. More modelling using this interacting-binary mechanism on other oscillating supernova light curves — those with longer periods and different supernova classifications — will show whether this explanation is ubiquitous, or if the population of dancing supernova light curves is due to some other process!

Original astrobite edited by Anavi Uppal.

About the author, Ryan White:

I am a masters student at Macquarie University in Australia, working mainly on binary/multiple systems with massive stars (Wolf–Rayets in particular!). Outside of study, I’m a novice film buff, baking sourdough all the time, probably drinking coffee, and trying to get more into reading and frisbee/squash. You can also find me procrastinating on Bluesky @astroryan.bsky.social.

The post Bumpy Road Ahead: Can Binary Interactions Make Supernovae Periodically Brighter? appeared first on AAS Nova.

Neutron stars don’t stick around for long after they’re born. Recent research has now uncovered just how fast they flee.

They Grow Up So Fast

Human beings require many years of care and support from their parents before they’re able to venture forth into the world. This is an embarrassingly long process compared to the standard for animals like deer and horses, whose offspring are ready to walk mere minutes after birth. However, baby neutron stars, some of the densest objects in the known universe, put all life on Earth to shame with their immediate self-reliance: after a fiery birth from a supernova explosion, these stars flee the site of their creation at hundreds of kilometers per second.

These “natal kicks,” as they’re called in research literature and in recent work by Paul Disberg and Ilya Mandel (Monash University and OzGrav) are a natural consequence of neutron star formation. When a massive star burns through the last of its fuel and surrenders to its own gravity, it collapses inward and compresses its core into a neutron star before rebounding in an explosion. This collapse is never perfectly symmetric, however, and the slight imbalance gives the resulting neutron star a shove.

By measuring the characteristic speeds of these “kicks,” astronomers can deduce how asymmetric the preceding collapse must have been, along with other information about the earliest moments of the supernova. Though measuring the speed of something so small from the other side of the galaxy is no easy task, Disberg and Mandel’s recent publication in The Astrophysical Journal Letters takes on the challenge.

Quantifying the Kicks

The pair first began by examining measurements of neutron stars known to be less than 10 million years old, which is extremely young in an astronomical context. Since these objects haven’t had time to be slowed down or altered from their course by passing stars or the galactic tide, their present-day speeds should be the same as their natal kicks. The researchers found that while every neutron star had its own unique kick velocity, the distribution of all the velocities followed a log-normal pattern with a peak near 150–200 km/s.

Next, Disberg and Mandel examined the distribution of velocities from older neutron stars. These, which had to be measured via a different method, turned out to be very similar to the distribution assigned to the younger stars. Finally, they re-examined previous studies that attempted their own models of the kick distribution. Though several of these studies conflicted with one another, the team found that these discrepancies could be explained by different sample sizes and mistaken statistical interpretations. On the whole, the team’s distribution fit all the available data well and the most succinctly of any alternative framework.

Going forward, other astronomers focused on modeling supernovae, orbits within the galaxy, and binary-star evolution can use this distribution either to sanity check their models or as inputs to other simulations. Through slow accumulation of studies like this, each with its own quantified measurement of some property in the galaxy, we come to understand our universe more fully and unlock our ability to make ever more models and predictions.

Citation

“The Kick Velocity Distribution of Isolated Neutron Stars,” Paul Disberg and Ilya Mandel 2025 ApJL 989 L8. doi:10.3847/2041-8213/adf286

The post Kicking Neutron Stars from the Nest appeared first on AAS Nova.

With a measurement 15 years in the making, astronomers have pinned down the path of a neutron star launched by a collapsing star. This finding helps to explain how neutron stars are “kicked” into space by supernovae.

Just for Kicks

When massive stars reach the end of their lives, they expire in a final, fantastic cosmic display: a core-collapse supernova. These events can leave behind remnants called neutron stars, which are composed of highly compressed neutrons arranged in a sphere roughly as wide as the island of Manhattan is long.

Many neutron stars have been observed to zip through space at hundreds of kilometers per second, which suggests that these stars get a “kick” when they’re born in a supernova. However, the details of this kick are not yet clear. Are neutron stars launched into space in the opposite direction from the material ejected in the explosion, as some studies suggest? Or is the neutron star’s motion determined by the burst of neutrinos that carries off most of the supernova’s energy, as other studies hint?

Worth the Wait

To answer these questions, astronomers must compare the velocities of young neutron stars to the movement of their associated supernova remnants. In a recent research article, Tyler Holland-Ashford (NASA Goddard Space Flight Center) and collaborators measured the motion of the neutron star affiliated with the G18.9–1.1 supernova remnant, using Chandra observations made 15 years apart in September 2009 and July 2024.

Making this measurement is trickier than it sounds, requiring more finesse than simply charting the location of the neutron star at different times. Holland-Ashford’s team used measurements from the ultra-precise star-mapping Gaia spacecraft to account for the proper motions of other sources in the images and to put the observations from the two time periods into the same frame of reference. After these adjustments, they measured the proper motion of the neutron star to be 24.7 milliarcseconds per year.

Because the distance to the supernova remnant is uncertain, this proper motion could correspond to a range of transverse velocities. For distance estimates of 6,800 and 12,400 light-years, this puts the neutron star’s transverse velocity at 264 or 474 km/s, respectively.

A Distinct Offset

What does this velocity tell us about the kick this neutron star received at birth? To probe the origin of the kick, the team first used the neutron star’s measured velocity and the likely age of the supernova remnant to trace the neutron star’s trajectory back to its birth site. This showed that the neutron star’s birthplace is offset from the center of the supernova remnant by several arcseconds, though both locations fall along the trajectory set by the neutron star’s motion. This suggests that the ejected stellar material and the newborn material were kicked in opposite directions by the supernova, most likely by a theorized “conservation-of-momentum-like” process.

Currently, Chandra is the only X-ray observatory with fine enough resolution to make the kind of measurement needed in this study. Luckily, Chandra’s observations of neutron stars stretch back to 1999, and combining this wealth of data with sensitive measurements from future high-resolution X-ray instruments should provide the long time baselines needed to trace the trajectories of more neutron stars and further explore the origins of neutron star kicks.

Citation

“Proper Motion of the Neutron Star in the Supernova Remnant G18.9–1.1,” Tyler Holland-Ashford et al 2025 ApJ 988 218. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/adeb7e

The post Get a Kick Out of This: Researchers Waited 15 Years to Measure a Neutron Star’s Journey appeared first on AAS Nova.

Do neutron stars form solely through core-collapse supernovae, or is there another way? New research explores theorized processes in which a white dwarf shrinks down to become a neutron star.

Alternate Pathways

Neutron stars are known to form when high-mass stars explode in core-collapse supernovae. Theory suggests these stars can also form through accretion-induced collapse and merger-induced collapse. These scenarios involve a white dwarf, the remnant core of a low- to intermediate-mass star. If a white dwarf becomes too massive to support itself, either by accreting gas from a companion or colliding with another white dwarf, it could, under certain conditions, collapse into a neutron star.

So far, researchers have yet to definitively associate any transient signal with the creation of a neutron star from a collapsing white dwarf, though there are several candidates. To advance the search for these signals, researchers must understand the details of the collapse and predict its electromagnetic signature.

Collapsing Further

Eirini Batziou (Max Planck Institute for Astrophysics and Technical University of Munich) and collaborators investigated the burst of nucleosynthesis that might follow a white dwarf’s collapse, potentially powering an electromagnetic transient. The team performed two-dimensional hydrodynamic simulations of six white dwarfs on the cusp of collapsing into neutron stars. Each simulation run varied the mass, central density, rotation rate, and angular momentum profile of the white dwarf. Two of the modeled white dwarfs had masses very close to the Chandrasekhar limit, the mass above which a white dwarf can hypothetically no longer support itself through electron degeneracy pressure. The remaining synthetic stars had higher masses that were bolstered by rapid rotation.

Each of the modeled white dwarfs began to collapse when the crushing pressure of gravity forced the star’s sea of electrons to invade atomic nuclei, removing the support of electron degeneracy pressure. The white dwarfs’ cores shrank and condensed into protoneutron stars, while their outer layers fell inward and rebounded.

Setting the Stage for Element Creation

The simulations show that rotating and non-rotating white dwarfs have different outcomes when they collapse. Non-rotating white dwarfs cast off material in all directions, while rapidly rotating white dwarfs tend to lose material through wide outflows at their poles. The equator of the rapidly rotating white dwarf is ringed by a torus of material that feeds the neutron star as it forms.

These divergent outcomes affect the amount of ejected material and the production of neutrinos. Ultimately, these differences result in opposite behavior: in the non-rotating case, the ejected material is initially rich in neutrons before transitioning to a proton-rich outflow, while the rotating case starts out with proton-rich ejecta that transitions to a neutron-rich outflow. This suggests that elements created through the rapid capture of neutrons, like gold, can form when white dwarfs collapse into neutron stars, potentially powering an observable electromagnetic signal.

These simulations by Batziou and coauthors are the first to extend substantially beyond the moment the outer layers of the collapsing white dwarf bounce off the central protoneutron star, illuminating the ejection of material, production of neutrinos, and nucleosynthesis. Future work will dive deeper into the details of element creation, predict the luminosity of these events, and explore the role of magnetic fields.

Citation

“Nucleosynthesis Conditions in Outflows of White Dwarfs Collapsing to Neutron Stars,” Eirini Batziou et al 2025 ApJ 984 197. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/adc300

The post Creation from Collapse: Making Elements in a White Dwarf’s Final Moments appeared first on AAS Nova.

When a black hole consumes a neutron star, it’s typically thought to do so without an electromagnetic belch. New research explores the conditions under which a black hole’s neutron-star feast produces an observable electromagnetic signal.

Signaling a Collision

In the past few years, gravitational-wave detectors across the globe have detected a handful of neutron star–black hole mergers. What sorts of electromagnetic signals might accompany these outbursts of gravitational waves is a matter of intense interest.

In rare cases, if the black hole and neutron star are relatively close in mass, their gravitational tussle will rip the neutron star apart. As the shredded stellar material collects in a searingly hot disk around the black hole, it is expected to power a bright transient like a kilonova or a gamma-ray burst.

More commonly, the black hole is much more massive than the neutron star. In this case, the black hole should swallow the neutron star whole and without an electromagnetic trace — unless, as recent research shows, a strong magnetic field surrounds the neutron star.

Detailed Simulations

Yoonsoo Kim (California Institute of Technology) and collaborators used general relativistic magnetohydrodynamic simulations to explore the electromagnetic signals that might accompany the collision of a black hole and a magnetized neutron star. The simulations follow an 8.0-solar-mass black hole as it merges with a 1.4-solar-mass neutron star with a magnetic field of roughly 10¹⁶ Gauss — more than 10 quadrillion times the strength of Earth’s magnetic field.

As the simulated neutron star plunges toward the black hole, the neutron star’s magnetosphere — the region of space in which particles bend to the will of the neutron star’s magnetic field — begins to ripple with waves. The waves expand outward at nearly the speed of light, launching an exceptionally massive shock. This monster shock drives the creation of an electromagnetic transient: a flash of radio waves called a fast radio burst.

Striped Winds and a Fleeting Pulsar Phase

A second type of transient arises after the neutron star merges with the black hole. After the neutron star vanishes within the black hole’s waiting maw, its leftover magnetic field rearranges and begins to rotate, dragged along by the spinning black hole. Briefly, the black hole enters a pulsar-like state, surrounded by a “striped” wind created by spiraling magnetic field lines in alternating directions. As this magnetic field dissipates, a “fireball” of magnetized electron–positron plasma is ejected. When these electron–positron pairs annihilate, they briefly release another electromagnetic signal: a burst of X-rays and gamma rays.

Kim and coauthors noted that their simulated neutron star–black hole pair is similar in mass to the colliding pairs spotted by gravitational-wave detectors. This suggests that detectable gravitational-wave events may be accompanied by brief bursts at radio, X-ray, and gamma-ray wavelengths, providing another avenue to learn about these cosmic collisions.

Citation

“Black Hole Pulsars and Monster Shocks as Outcomes of Black Hole–Neutron Star Mergers,” Yoonsoo Kim et al 2025 ApJL 982 L54. doi:10.3847/2041-8213/adbff9

The post Black Hole vs. Magnetized Neutron Star: Matchup Predictions appeared first on AAS Nova.