© Jason Gulley for The New York Times
© American Bird Conservancy
The mass extinction event known as the Great Dying, which occurred 252 million years ago, resulted in the loss of 96% of marine species, and for many years, scientists could not fully explain why certain animals disappeared while others survived.
That longstanding mystery may be closer to a resolution, thanks to a recent study in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, which suggests that differences in physiology, metabolism, and oxygen use helped determine which marine animals survived the catastrophe.
Stanford University researchers found that physiological differences largely determined which marine animals survived the end-Permian mass extinction after warming oceans lost much of their oxygen. Animals whose bodies could not meet rising oxygen demands, including brachiopods and crinoids that had long ruled the seafloor, had a hard time surviving as ocean temperatures rose and oxygen in the water dropped.
By contrast, mollusks and fish possessed body plans better suited to supplying oxygen as temperatures climbed, allowing them to survive in greater numbers.
“With this study, we essentially wanted to solve the mystery of why, when you go to the beach, you collect the shells of clams and snails rather than those of brachiopods,” said lead author Jose Andres Marquez, a former PhD student in the lab of Stanford’s Erik Anders Sperling.
Marquez and his team developed a model based on species’ metabolic oxygen balance and tested it using direct measurements of oxygen use in living relatives of both ancient groups. This included brachiopods collected from the San Juan Islands in Washington. Their results revealed that the risk of extinction closely aligned with how much oxygen a species required and how effectively it could transport oxygen within its body.
Modern sea animals, such as bivalves, gastropods, and fish, have become more active and muscular over time. Their hunting habits demand more oxygen, even under normal conditions. Although this could seem like a disadvantage during harsh times, it actually worked in their favor. When ocean temperatures rose and oxygen levels dropped during the Permian-Triassic period, these animals already relied on features such as gills, strong blood flow, and larger muscles to get more oxygen when needed.
On the other hand, Paleozoic animals like brachiopods and crinoids were slow-moving filter feeders that thrived in low-oxygen environments when things were stable. However, as temperatures rose, they required more oxygen, and their bodies could not keep up with the demand in the now-oxygen-poor waters.
“Our findings show that, across different organism groups, extinctions happened at much higher rates for those more vulnerable to increases in water temperature and decreases in oxygen availability,” Marquez said.
The findings support decades of evidence from the fossil record. Brachiopods, which once accounted for thousands of species, now number about 400. In contrast, bivalves have diversified and now account for between 10,000 and 15,000 species.
Sperling previously co-authored a 2018 study that identified oxygen loss and warming as the main causes of the Great Dying. However, that earlier research used only physiological data from modern species, so the results were influenced by data from commercially important fish and crustaceans rather than from the ancient groups that have largely disappeared. The new study addresses this limitation by directly measuring the physiology of living representatives of ancient animal groups, including brachiopods.
“This study is really the final nail in the coffin for what caused the Permian-Triassic mass extinction,” Sperling said.
The environmental changes that led to the Great Dying began in oceans that were relatively cool and well-oxygenated, similar to present-day conditions. A massive release of volcanic carbon dioxide altered the atmosphere, driving global temperatures up by 8 to 12 degrees Celsius over several thousand years. By comparison, current climate projections estimate a rise of 1.5 to 4 degrees Celsius above preindustrial levels by 2100, but over a much shorter timescale. “The bad news is, we are on track for Permian-Triassic levels of warming in worst-case scenario projections,” Sperling said.
By comparing more groups of marine animals, the researchers hope to determine whether the physiological patterns that shaped Earth’s greatest mass extinction could help predict which species are most vulnerable as today’s oceans continue to warm. “We’re still at the point where we can change things and do something about it,” Sperling emphasized.
Austin Burgess is a writer and researcher with a background in sales, marketing, and data analytics. He holds an MBA, a Bachelor of Science in Business Administration, and a data analytics certification. His work focuses on breaking scientific developments, with an emphasis on emerging biology, cognitive neuroscience, and archaeological discoveries.
Villagers in Awoye in the Niger Delta say the ongoing pollution is causing sickness and environmental destruction, while pleas for help go unanswered
Perched on a narrow hospital cot across from her son, Bodunwa Orugbemi can hear the distant Atlantic Ocean and smell the stench of crude oil on the air drifting in from the shore. For days, her 21-year-old son has been lying in this hospital in the Niger Delta, swallowing small spoonfuls of food without being able to speak.
Seventy‑year‑old Orugbemi says Ijadopin started coughing one evening in May, inside their small wooden home in Awoye on Nigeria’s Atlantic coastline. After a few days his cough intensified, then he developed a skin irritation, followed by difficulty breathing.
Continue reading...
© Photograph: NurPhoto/Getty Images
© Photograph: NurPhoto/Getty Images
© Photograph: NurPhoto/Getty Images
In a groundbreaking study that promises to reshape our understanding of Arctic marine ecosystems, researchers have uncovered evidence of unexpected biological productivity along the Barents Sea ice edge during the late Holocene. The investigation, led by A.J. Pieńkowski and colleagues, utilized advanced biomarker analysis to trace diatom enrichment—a key indicator of primary production—in sediment cores, revealing complex ecological dynamics that continue to defy conventional seasonal models of polar phytoplankton activity. This discovery has broad implications for climate science, marine biology, and our conceptual frameworks regarding ice-edge ecosystems in a warming Arctic.
The Barents Sea, located north of Norway and Russia, is a key region for studying the effects of climate change on Arctic environments due to its unique position between Atlantic and Arctic waters. Historically, sea ice has been understood to exert a controlling influence over the timing and intensity of phytoplankton blooms, with primary productivity peaking during the spring and early summer months as ice melts. However, the extreme late-Holocene interval analyzed in this study suggests that productivity along the ice edge may extend much later into the seasonal cycle than previously thought, indicating a previously underappreciated ecological niche.
Central to this research is the application of organic geochemical proxies, notably diatom-specific biomarkers such as highly branched isoprenoids (HBIs). These molecular fossils are derived from diatoms—microscopic photosynthetic algae—and provide a window into past productivity and environmental conditions. By examining sediment layers deposited over the last several thousand years, the team identified striking elevations in diatom biomarker concentrations during late-season periods, suggesting not only prolonged but intensified ice-edge productivity.
The implications of these findings are profound, signaling that the timing of phytoplankton blooms may have been more flexible and responsive to environmental variables over millennial timescales than contemporary observations suggest. This shifts paradigms about marine food web dynamics in polar regions, as late-season blooms could support secondary consumers such as zooplankton—and by extension, fish and marine mammals—during periods traditionally seen as low productivity. Such dynamics have likely played a crucial role in shaping Arctic biodiversity through time.
Moreover, the study highlights the interplay between sea ice extent, melt timing, and nutrient availability. While earlier models posited that retreating ice reduces habitat for ice-associated algae and thus limits productivity, these new data reveal a more nuanced picture where late-season melting creates persistent ice edges that serve as hotspots for diatom proliferation. Nutrient enrichment via upwelling and Atlantic water inflow likely contributed to sustaining this productivity, challenging assumptions about the oligotrophic nature of the late melt season.
In terms of methodology, the research exemplifies the cutting-edge integration of paleoceanography and organic geochemistry. Sediment cores were meticulously sampled and subjected to high-resolution biomarker profiling, allowing for temporal reconstructions at seasonal to decadal scales. The use of isotopic analyses further corroborated the timing of these bio-events, lending robustness to interpretations about late-season environmental conditions in the Barents Sea. This methodological sophistication underscores the potential for biomarker proxies to unlock hidden chapters of ecological history.
Notably, the timing of the extreme biomarker enrichments correlates with known climatic variability during the late Holocene, including phases of relative warming and cooling. This temporal correspondence suggests that even subtle shifts in temperature and sea ice dynamics may have orchestrated significant ecological reorganization in polar marine systems. Understanding these past responses is critical as anthropogenic warming accelerates, potentially recreating or amplifying such conditions in the near future.
From a broader perspective, the recognition of late-season ice-edge productivity has ramifications for global biogeochemical cycles. Phytoplankton are pivotal in sequestering atmospheric CO2, and extending the productive season could mean that polar oceans play a more dynamic role in the carbon cycle than appreciated. This discovery invites a reassessment of climate models that currently may underestimate the biological feedback potential of Arctic marine ecosystems during the waning ice season.
The study’s revelations also emphasize the resilience and adaptability of polar marine life. Despite harsh and fluctuating conditions, diatoms and associated microbial communities have exploited ephemeral niches, adjusting phenology and productivity patterns to optimize survival and growth. Such adaptive strategies may become increasingly important as climate perturbations continue to reshape polar habitats, with unknown consequences for ecosystem stability and services.
In practical terms, these findings could inform conservation and management strategies. As the Barents Sea and broader Arctic region become more accessible due to ice retreat, understanding seasonal productivity pulses is crucial for fisheries, indigenous communities, and environmental stewardship. Recognizing late-season productivity hotspots could guide sustainable use and protection of biologically rich zones that emerge under shifting climatic regimes.
Furthermore, this research opens new avenues for interdisciplinary collaboration, bridging paleoclimatology, marine ecology, and environmental chemistry. Future studies may leverage the biomarkers identified here to monitor contemporary changes in Arctic productivity and validate predictive models. Additionally, analogous approaches could elucidate productivity dynamics in other polar and subpolar regions, deepening our global perspective on climate-ecosystem interactions.
Given the rapidity of ongoing climatic change, the temporal insights provided by this late-Holocene study serve as a crucial baseline, contextualizing contemporary observations within a longer-term framework. This historical depth equips scientists and policymakers with a richer understanding of variability and resilience in polar systems, enhancing our capacity to anticipate and mitigate the impacts of a warming world.
In sum, the work by Pieńkowski, Belt, Husum, and their team has decisively expanded our comprehension of ice-edge ecosystems, revealing a vibrant and late-blooming diatom community thriving in conditions once thought marginal or unproductive. Their integration of molecular biomarkers and paleoenvironmental techniques creates a compelling narrative of Arctic productivity that challenges prevailing assumptions and invigorates future research paths. As the Arctic ice retreats, these insights become not only academically fascinating but vitally important for forecasting and managing the biological pulse of the planet’s coldest seas.
This landmark study stands as a testament to the power of interdisciplinary science to uncover hidden complexities within Earth’s most extreme environments, shining a light on the subtle yet dynamic rhythms of life beneath the ice. It invites a reconsideration of the Arctic not as a static frozen desert, but as a place of seasonal vibrancy and ecological innovation sustained by the delicate interplay of ice, ocean, and life.
Subject of Research: Arctic ice-edge diatom productivity and late-season ecosystem dynamics during the late Holocene.
Article Title: Extreme late-Holocene diatom biomarker enrichment reveals late-season ice-edge productivity in the Barents Sea.
Article References:
Pieńkowski, A.J., Belt, S.T., Husum, K. et al. Extreme late-Holocene diatom biomarker enrichment reveals late-season ice-edge productivity in the Barents Sea. Commun Earth Environ (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-026-03717-3
Image Credits: AI Generated
DOI: 10.1038/s43247-026-03717-3
Keywords: Arctic marine ecosystems, Barents Sea, diatom biomarkers, highly branched isoprenoids, late Holocene, ice-edge productivity, paleoclimate, sediment cores, phytoplankton phenology, Arctic sea ice dynamics, biogeochemical cycles, climate change, biomarker proxies.
Someone's thrash is another one's treasure - this old saying has an entirely different meaning for an octopus.In recent years, the coastal waters of Vancouver have witnessed an unprecedented resurgence of whale activity, captivating marine biologists and local observers alike. This renewed presence, not merely anecdotal, stems from a culmination of seasonal patterns, thriving ecosystems, and impactful conservation measures. A comprehensive study led by researchers at the University of British Columbia’s Institute for the Oceans and Fisheries (IOF) has quantitatively confirmed that transient killer whales now inhabit the Salish Sea for more than two-thirds of the year. Alongside these apex predators, humpback and grey whales are increasingly frequenting these waters, signaling a dynamic shift in regional marine biodiversity.
Transient killer whales, known for their elusive nature and specialized diet of marine mammals, particularly seals and sea lions, are now commonly sighted along Vancouver’s shoreline and within the surrounding straits and harbors. Data collected from 2016 to 2023 underscores not only their presence but also their routine exploitation of these rich feeding grounds. This expanded usage correlates strongly with the rebound of pinniped populations, themselves benefiting from decades-old protections that halted their severe culling. The recovery has thus created a robust trophic cascade, enabling transient killer whales to establish a near year-round residency within the inside waters of Vancouver Island.
Humpback whales represent another remarkable comeback story in this region. Historically decimated by intense commercial whaling in the early 20th century, these baleen giants were completely extirpated from British Columbia waters by 1910. Without older generations to transmit migratory and feeding knowledge, their return to ancestral feeding grounds was lost for nearly a century. However, conservation efforts since the 1960s, including international bans on whaling and improved fisheries management, have facilitated a population recovery that now sees substantial numbers of humpbacks returning each summer to feast on abundant krill, herring, and other prey.
The presence of grey whales in areas around Vancouver is comparatively anomalous but increasingly documented. These whales typically forage offshore near Alaska, subsisting on amphipods—small crustaceans dependent on nutrient-rich algae associated with Arctic sea ice. The drastic loss of sea ice due to climate change directly undermines this fundamental food source, causing nutritional stress especially among pregnant and lactating females who must meet extraordinarily high energetic demands during migration and calf-rearing periods. Consequently, some grey whales are observed making unscheduled stops in the Salish Sea, an adaptation that reflects their deteriorating foraging options rather than traditional migratory behavior.
Studies estimate that pregnant grey whales require a daily intake of approximately 1,600 to 1,900 kilograms of prey to sustain both fetal development and energy reserves critical for postnatal care during their long migrations. Following calving, lactating females continue to consume between 1,300 and 1,600 kilograms of prey daily to nourish their calves for several months. Disruptions in prey availability, driven by climate-induced changes in sea ice and associated ecosystem dynamics, are thus placing immense physiological strain on these populations. The unfortunate consequence has been an observed increase in mortality rates, with malnourished grey whales occasionally stranding along the coastline.
This resurgence of whale activity near Vancouver not only highlights the success of targeted conservation policies but also underscores emerging challenges. Increased interactions between humans and whales necessitate rigorous adherence to safe viewing practices. Researchers advocate for maintaining substantial distances from whales—minimum thresholds are typically 200 meters for most killer whales and extend to 1,000 meters for the endangered southern resident killer whales. The regulations also stipulate 100 meters for other cetaceans, increasing to 200 meters when whales are resting or accompanied by calves. These guidelines are critical in minimizing disturbances and preventing collisions, which pose significant risks to these vulnerable animals.
Furthermore, the role of public awareness and responsible recreational boating cannot be overstated. Boaters, kayakers, and paddleboarders are urged to stay vigilant and reduce speeds when whale blowholes are sighted. The unpredictability of whale movements demands a precautionary approach to navigation within whale habitats. Educational initiatives, such as free online whale-safe boating courses offered by organizations like the Marine Education & Research Society (MERS), have proven effective tools in promoting safer human-wildlife coexistence in marine environments.
The broader implications of these findings extend into the realm of ecosystem health and global climate resilience. Whales function as keystone species, their feeding and migratory behaviors facilitating nutrient transport and productivity within marine systems. The return of diverse whale populations to coastal waters symbolizes not just ecological recovery but offers hope for restoring complex marine food webs fractured by human exploitation. Yet, the acute vulnerability of species such as grey whales to climate-driven habitat changes serves as a stark reminder of ongoing environmental threats.
Simultaneously, the study’s revelations about transient killer whales reveal a nuanced predator-prey dynamic finely attuned to regional ecosystem changes over recent decades. The resurgence of pinniped populations has provided these cetaceans with ample sustenance, allowing for sustained presence in traditionally seasonal zones. This trophic realignment invites further studies into the long-term evolutionary and behavioral adaptations of marine mammals in a rapidly changing oceanic milieu.
Whale conservation is, thus, at a critical juncture. While success stories abound, exemplified by humpback recovery, emerging stressors including climate change, ship traffic, and underwater noise pollution complicate the ecological narrative. The scientific community and policymakers must continue fostering adaptive management strategies that address these multifaceted challenges while engaging public participation for effective stewardship.
In conclusion, the intensifying presence of transient killer whales, humpbacks, and grey whales in Vancouver’s coastal waters offers a vivid testament to both nature’s resilience and the pressing need for sustained conservation vigilance. These marine mammals, emblematic of wider ocean health, depend on intact habitats, thoughtful human behaviors, and responsive environmental policies. As our understanding deepens through ongoing research, so too must our commitment to coexistence with these ocean giants, ensuring their survival amidst an era of rapid ecological transformation.
Subject of Research: Marine mammal population dynamics and conservation in Pacific Northwest coastal waters.
Article Title: Rebounding Giants: The Return of Whales to Vancouver’s Coastal Waters
News Publication Date: Not specified in the provided content.
Web References:
References:
Image Credits: Julia Adelsheim
Keywords: Whales, Cetaceans, Marine mammals, Transient killer whales, Humpback whales, Grey whales, Conservation, Climate change effects, Salish Sea, Marine ecology, Pinnipeds, Fisheries management
© <p>By NOAA - Flickr.com, CC BY 2.0, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=133642124</p>
Login