❌

Normal view

Meta Quest user vibe-codes 3D object throwing to 3D printer — ‘I've never felt more like Tony Stark’ says the software engineer

14 September 2026 at 12:17

A software engineer and creative tinkerer has shown off a futuristic Meta Quest plus 3D printer workflow in a video shared on social media. Hank on X demonstrates modeling a 3D object on his computer, which he then picks up and throws to his 3D printing system across the room. “I've never felt more like Tony Stark,” joked the tech enthusiast.

I've never felt more like Tony Stark than I do now. Using my Meta Quest, I can just throw 3D models at my 3D printers to have them start printing it😂 pic.twitter.com/xNTe4KAVM2September 13, 2026

Let’s look more closely at the hardware in use before talking about the integration in play. The demonstration video clearly shows that Hank has a Bambu Lab P2S 3D printer with an AMS 2 multi-material system on top. We reviewed the Bambu Lab P2S with AMS2 last October, and gave it a pretty glowing 4.5/5 review score thanks to lots of features and factors in its favor. Hank has integrated this 3D printer with his Meta Quest 3 headset. We last reviewed one of these HMDs back in December 2024 when we tested the Quest 3S, and it was also a 4.5/5 star winner.

So, these two great pieces of hardware don’t usually work together, but that didn’t deter Hank. Not much anyway. Later in the tweet thread, Hank reveals that “The Bambu Lab printers have an API that you can use to control them locally! [So I] Spun up a quick web server on my PC that glued everything together! (Android app -> PC -> 3D printer).”

Of course, other Bambu Lab 3D printer users with Meta Quest headsets were interested in following in Hank’s footsteps. The software engineer said that the integration was finessed with the help of OpenAI’s GPT-6 Astra model (so, yes, it’s vibe coded), but wasn’t available on GitHub as yet. However, our 3D printing-in-VR hero indicated that they would be happy to share the code online if there was enough interest (and after a bit of code polishing).

We've entered the golden era of gaming. I had GPT-6 Astra reverse engineer Super Smash Bros Melee to work on my Meta Quest 3 with VR controls. I'll post my first real battle in the replies https://t.co/vDHsPTPOmM pic.twitter.com/abJvxHU5KfSeptember 9, 2026

Hank’s tweets are full of interesting projects mixing VR and vibe coding. In another noteworthy post (embedded above), he shows he used Astra to get the recently released Super Smash Bros Melee decompilation to work on the Meta Quest 3 with VR controls.

This $399 Elegoo Centauri Carbon 2 Combo with $1 filament is the perfect 3D printer deal for beginners — flash sale discount nets you a Core XY printer with four-color system and auto bed leveling

10 September 2026 at 16:00

Elegoo is running a special sale on new 3D printers throughout September, in celebration of its community of makers. The Elegoo Day sale means that, right now, you can pick up an Elegoo Centuari Carbon 2 Combo, along with 1KG of filament, for just $400. You can actually secure it for $399, but the extra dollar nets you 1KG of PLA filament on top, which seems like a fair trade.

● Check out this deal at Elegoo

Introduced earlier in the year, this stripped-down version of the Centauri Carbon 2 scored 3.5 stars in our review. It's the cheaper model, with some missing features compared to its bigger sibling, but it's a worthy option for beginner makers, especially given its price.

In terms of specs, you're getting a Core XY 3D printer that uses the Canvas four-color system, with instant color switching and smart filament detection, and with a build volume of 256 x 256 x 256mm. You can expect to hit temperatures between 110C and 350C with this bed, which means you're able to print with some of the more problematic filament types like PET-GF and PCTG, although the printer offers support for a variety of materials, including PLA, PETG, TPU, and ABS.

Centauri Carbon 2 Combo with 1KG filament for $1: was $449 now $400
The Elegoo Centauri Carbon 2 combo offers a build volume of 256 x 256 x 256 mm and supports multi-material and multi-color 3D printing on a budget. Pay an extra $1 for 1KG of filament on top of your order.

Grab the Centauri Carbon 2 Combo on its own for $399 instead with this link.View Deal

You get a large touchscreen for controlling the printer, with features like calibration and auto bed leveling, and 31 intelligent sensors to help probe and level the print area, all designed to make the printer simple to use. The Carbon 2 Combo is easy to use, with great print quality that rivals Elegoo's pricier models.

The 3D printer market is filled with choice, but the Centauri Carbon 2 Combo is a good, budget-friendly option for makers to try for just $400 right now. The fairly large build volume, fast print speeds, four-color filament system, and wide support mean you're able to get started with complex prints with ease. The $370 sale price includes 1KG of PLA filament, one of the best filaments for 3D printers to start out with due to its forgiving nature. You can choose between white, black, and grey filaments, with further sale discounts available on additional spools.

The secret to protecting next-gen spacecraft might be eggshells

8 September 2026 at 17:20

In 2007, a piece of space debris punched a bullet-like hole through the radiator panel of the US space shuttle Endeavor. The shuttle program ended in 2011, but the space debris problem has only intensified as we launch more and more satellite constellations, telescopes, and spacecraft into orbit. That's why Chinese scientists have devised a new aluminum material inspired by eggshells that they believe could offer enhanced protection against debris fragments, according to a new paper published in the Journal of Applied Physics.

Eggshells have long fascinated scientists because of their mechanical properties. For instance, it's well known that cracking an egg requires applying just enough force to the center to achieve a clean break without completely shattering the shell. In 2012, MIT mechanical engineer Pedro Reis co-authored a paper demonstrating the link between an egg's ovoid geometry and its rigidity, a major factor when predicting how much force an object can endure before cracking. (As I wrote for Slate at the time, rigidity is related to, but distinct from, strength. If one eggshell has tiny cracks and the other doesn't, both shells have different strengths—the cracked one will break more easily—but the same rigidity.)

Reis started studying eggshells after participating in a popular physics demonstration: walking on cartons of eggs without breaking them. The key, he learned, was to align the eggs with their narrow tip (the most crack-resistant part) pointing up, and then carefully place one's feet to distribute one's weight over the entire surface area. This ensures that no single egg is overloaded. While it takes around 5.5 pounds of force to crack an egg, that depends on the direction in which the force is applied, as well as its distribution over the shell's surface.

Read full article

Comments

© Wang et al., 2026

The secret to protecting next-gen spacecraft might be eggshells

8 September 2026 at 17:20

In 2007, a piece of space debris punched a bullet-like hole through the radiator panel of the US space shuttle Endeavor. The shuttle program ended in 2011, but the space debris problem has only intensified as we launch more and more satellite constellations, telescopes, and spacecraft into orbit. That's why Chinese scientists have devised a new aluminum material inspired by eggshells that they believe could offer enhanced protection against debris fragments, according to a new paper published in the Journal of Applied Physics.

Eggshells have long fascinated scientists because of their mechanical properties. For instance, it's well known that cracking an egg requires applying just enough force to the center to achieve a clean break without completely shattering the shell. In 2012, MIT mechanical engineer Pedro Reis co-authored a paper demonstrating the link between an egg's ovoid geometry and its rigidity, a major factor when predicting how much force an object can endure before cracking. (As I wrote for Slate at the time, rigidity is related to, but distinct from, strength. If one eggshell has tiny cracks and the other doesn't, both shells have different strengths—the cracked one will break more easily—but the same rigidity.)

Reis started studying eggshells after participating in a popular physics demonstration: walking on cartons of eggs without breaking them. The key, he learned, was to align the eggs with their narrow tip (the most crack-resistant part) pointing up, and then carefully place one's feet to distribute one's weight over the entire surface area. This ensures that no single egg is overloaded. While it takes around 5.5 pounds of force to crack an egg, that depends on the direction in which the force is applied, as well as its distribution over the shell's surface.

Read full article

Comments

© Wang et al., 2026

The secret to protecting next-gen spacecraft might be eggshells

8 September 2026 at 17:20

In 2007, a piece of space debris punched a bullet-like hole through the radiator panel of the US space shuttle Endeavor. The shuttle program ended in 2011, but the space debris problem has only intensified as we launch more and more satellite constellations, telescopes, and spacecraft into orbit. That's why Chinese scientists have devised a new aluminum material inspired by eggshells that they believe could offer enhanced protection against debris fragments, according to a new paper published in the Journal of Applied Physics.

Eggshells have long fascinated scientists because of their mechanical properties. For instance, it's well known that cracking an egg requires applying just enough force to the center to achieve a clean break without completely shattering the shell. In 2012, MIT mechanical engineer Pedro Reis co-authored a paper demonstrating the link between an egg's ovoid geometry and its rigidity, a major factor when predicting how much force an object can endure before cracking. (As I wrote for Slate at the time, rigidity is related to, but distinct from, strength. If one eggshell has tiny cracks and the other doesn't, both shells have different strengths—the cracked one will break more easily—but the same rigidity.)

Reis started studying eggshells after participating in a popular physics demonstration: walking on cartons of eggs without breaking them. The key, he learned, was to align the eggs with their narrow tip (the most crack-resistant part) pointing up, and then carefully place one's feet to distribute one's weight over the entire surface area. This ensures that no single egg is overloaded. While it takes around 5.5 pounds of force to crack an egg, that depends on the direction in which the force is applied, as well as its distribution over the shell's surface.

Read full article

Comments

© Wang et al., 2026

Anycubic Photon P1 MAX review: bigger, better, and tech-packed

7 September 2026 at 12:05

Anycubic’s newest Photon P1 was released a few months ago, and now it’s time for its bigger brother to step into the resin printing spotlight. Replacing the current Mono M7 Max, the Anycubic Photon P1 MAX packs in some new tech, along with a larger build volume.

Anycubic is showing off its new refined look for resin printing here – sleek, simple, and user- friendly. The Photon P1 Max has the same look and feel as the P1. However, the firmware on the machine we are testing was still in its early stages. With a few bugs, it still works as it should.

The Anycubic P1 MAX is currently on a presale on Anycubic's website for $1,103.00. After the presale, the P1 MAX will go up to $1,149, which isn’t a significant price increase. With all the tech packed into this printer and its simple, sleek design, it’s a great addition to any 3D printer’s workshop and lands a spot on our best resin printers list.

Specifications: Anycubic Photon P1 MAX

Build Volume

285.5 x 214 x 300 mm (11.2 x 8.4 x 11.8 inches)

LCD Screen

1-inch 12K monochrome

Light Source

COB (Chip-on-board) + Reflector +Aspherical Fresnel Lens

X/Y Axis Resolution

24.8 x 24.8μm

Normal Exposure Time

2.0 seconds

Interface

4.5-inch resistive touchscreen

Connectivity

USB, Wi-Fi

Machine Footprint

430 x 414 x 625 mm (16.9 x 16.2 x 24.6 inches)

Machine Weight

23.1kg (50.9 lbs)

Release Date

July 22, 2026

MSRP

$1,103

Included in the Box: Anycubic Photon P1 MAX

Anycubic Photon P1 Max Review

(Image credit: Tom's Hardware)

The Anycubic P1 Max ships with the standard resin printer starter accessories. This includes a Metal scraper, a set of Allen keys, a user manual, a USB drive, a power cord, plus a wipe for the inside of the hood and a plastic scraper.

The USB drive comes pre-loaded with Anycubic’s Photon Workshop Slicer, test files, and a digital manual.

Anycubic Photon P1 Max Review

(Image credit: Tom's Hardware)

On the back of the printer is a rubber grommet for those who want to add a vent to the back of the printer for fume extraction. No hose is provided with this printer, so you will need to source one that fits to make it usable.

Printing Safety with Anycubic Photon P1 MAX

Anycubic Photon P1 Max Review

(Image credit: Tom's Hardware)

The Anycubic Photon P1 MAX requires the same safety precautions as any other resin printer. Uncured resin is dangerous, and the solvents used to clean your prints can be irritating to skin or cause sensitivity issues over time. Use gloves and safety glasses when pouring resin and handling uncured prints.

Make sure the room you use your resin printer in is well-ventilated to avoid inhaling fumes. Spilled resin should be immediately cleaned up with 99% isopropyl alcohol. After printing, make sure to wipe down your printer and bottles to remove smudges of uncured resin. Always keep your resin tightly sealed and safely stored out of reach of pets and children.

Assembling the Anycubic Photon P1 MAX

The Anycubic P1 MAX comes fully assembled out of the box. You’ll just need to remove the packing material from the build plate area and peel the screen protectors and labels off the printer and FEP Film.

If you choose any add-ons, such as the perforated build plate, they will be supplied in separate boxes.

Calibrating the Build Plate on the Anycubic Photon P1 MAX

Anycubic Photon P1 Max Review

On the screen here, you can see two of our favorite features of the P1 MAX, the Intelligent Assistant 3.0 and the Smart Dynamic Balance system. (Image credit: Tom's Hardware)

The P1 MAX, just like the smaller P1, has the same assist features for leveling. You can choose to have the auto-leveling feature on at all times, which I do recommend, but there are times when it’s a good idea to check and make sure all is good after printing for a while. Personally, with these new printers, I tend to check the level right after the first test print to make sure everything is leveled properly.

I am still humbled by the fact that this printer has a pressure system to level the printer. It’s such a nice feature to have. That said, our review unit seems to have a firmware glitch. It levels the build plate, then raises the build plate off the screen about 100 mm. Then you adjust the screws and do it again to get the proper level. It’s not that bad, honestly. You just need to make sure you give it a little turn and go and adjust from there. Hopefully, Anycubic will patch this to make it work just like the smaller P1, where you adjust while the plate is against the screen, as it should be.

Design of the Anycubic Photon P1 MAX

Anycubic Photon P1 Max Review

(Image credit: Tom's Hardware)

The Anycubic P1 MAX shares the same exterior and interior design as the smaller P1, which is polished and professional-looking. Anycubic has stepped up its game significantly on the design front, and I’m here for it. Normally, we see cutbacks on newer printers to make them more affordable for the end user, and that's all fine and dandy, but there is something about a nice, weighted printer that gives you that feel of quality over quantity.

Anycubic Photon P1 Max Review

(Image credit: Tom's Hardware)

The Locking System for the build plate is one of the better ones out there – no longer are you worrying about unscrewing the normal screw like in the past with resin printers. This has a flip-up / down locking system that is nice and chunky, a big plus. The same follows with the vat, which features a slide-in / out locking system that gets rid of the old screws. This is a nice upgrade, because you no longer have to worry about losing screws or getting resin spilled inside the screw holes when swapping vats.

The touch screen is just your standard 4.5-inch panel, but it was also nice and responsive in our testing. Handles on the sides of the printer make it easy to move around if needed, as well.

The P1 MAX has a heated vat that is constantly being maintained at a precise 35 degrees Celsius (95 F). Previous Anycubic resin owners have struggled with printers only initially heating up and then cutting off after that. That is no longer the case here.

The vat also features a drop tray for your build plate, which makes resin cleanup much easier. One thing you won't have to worry about much is the vat capacity: This Vat holds up to 1900ML(1.9L) of resin, which is plenty for any print task.

Anycubic Photon P1 Max Review

(Image credit: Anycubic)

The most unique feature on the P1 MAX is the Wave Release technology. Anycubic decided to put a special screen cover over the LCD to help ease the release of all prints, and it works wonderfully. This tech keeps air bubbles from being trapped between the FEP Film and the screen, making the peel force smooth like butter.

Slicer compatibility with the Anycubic Photon P1 MAX

Anycubic Photon P1 Max Review

(Image credit: Tom's Hardware)

The Anycubic Photon P1 MAX comes with Anycubic’s Photon Workshop Slicer pre-loaded onto the USB drive. It’s generally very user-friendly and works very well with prints. You select your resin, add your supports, and slice. Send the file to your printer, and you're done. For those who are not fans of having multiple slicers on their system, the good news is that both Chitubox and Lychee support the Anycubic Photon P1 MAX.

Sample Prints on the Anycubic Photon P1 MAX

Anycubic Photon P1 Max Review

Tyrael Figure - Diablo by FotisMint (Image credit: Tom's Hardware)

Using Anycubic Standard Resin in Gray, I wanted to print out some models for a co-worker who is a big Diablo fan. Searching around Makerworld, I came across this figure of Tyrael, and this model by FotisMint was already split into pieces for easier printing. I brought it into the slicer, angled the print, added some automatic medium supports, hit slice, and sent it off to the printer via WIFI. This model printed in 7 hours and 24 minutes at 0.050mm layer height. Taking 254ml of resin, it cost a little over $5 to print. A normal figure like this would be roughly between $25-$80. That’s quite the savings, even adding in the cost of paint.

Adding another print from the Diablo series, I decided to print the Lord of Terror from Makerworld as well. This print I scaled up a bit to make it more boss-like.

Anycubic Photon P1 Max Review

Diablo Lord of Terror - Prime Evil by Cadel (Image credit: Tom's Hardware)

This was printed with a mix of Anycubic’s standard gray and white. It printed in 14 hours and 15 minutes, using 1106ML(1.1kg) of resin.

For the last test print, I wanted to do something different. A few years ago, I saw a print for a Pokémon Cubone mask for a dog. So to MakerWorld I went, searching for one that I could print easily, and I found one. It was a two-part mask with little pegs to clip them together. This is nice in part, because if one side of the mask breaks, you can just reprint it. This was sized for a smaller dog right off the bat, so I supported the print and sent it to the printer.

It printed in six hours and five minutes and used 519 ml of resin. I printed this in standard Anycubic gray resin.

Anycubic Photon P1 Max Review

Dog and Cat Mask (Cubone from Pokemon) by Notorious (Image credit: Tom's Hardware)

Washing and Curing Your Prints PSA

Before you can admire your prints, you’ll need to wash them with isopropyl alcohol and cure them with a UV light. I like to give prints a 30-second hand rinse in a container of 95% Isopropyl alcohol, then a 2-minute rinse in the Anycubic Wash and Cure, which is sold separately and retails for $249 at Anycubic.com.

Completely dry the print with a hair dryer on cool – IPA left on the print will turn white. You can also let the print air dry in a place away from sunlight.

Supports are easier to remove before curing because they are softer. Clip the supports off with side cutters and use tweezers to remove stubborn supports. Remember to always wear gloves while handling uncured prints.

Then place the print in a UV curing station for 15 minutes, or outside in bright sunlight for a few hours.

Your IPA should never be flushed down the drain, especially after being contaminated with uncured resin. Instead, keep using the resin until it’s too dirty, then leave the container open to evaporate. The remaining sludge can be cured with UV light or the sun before being thrown away.

Supports should also be cured before being thrown away.

Bottom Line

The Anycubic Photon P1 MAX is packed with tech and features that are handy for novices and experienced printers alike. It’s easy to use and straightforward to set up. The touchscreen walks you through every aspect to get it started. Anycubic really took user suggestions on this printer and implemented them with precision. If you're new to resin printing and looking for a simple, easy-to-use, and helpful resin printer with a larger volume, this one should be on your short list.

At its current price of $1,103, it’s also a great value. And if you miss the presale window, the $1,149 standard price isn’t a big jump. You can also buy it at Amazon for only $899, if you avail of the $230 coupon. It has features to make sure your print comes out as expected, a heated vat for those who print in cold climates, and the build plate size is a home run in this price range. If you're not looking to print large-size models, the P1 is a great alternative and is currently on sale for only $499.

Start your 3D printing journey for just $169 with these Elegoo printers before Labor Day ends — lock in up to 35% off the easy-to-use Neptune 3 Pro or go large with the Neptune 4 Plus for massive model printing

7 September 2026 at 11:50

The Labor Day tech deals are nearly finished, but there are still a few discounts on 3D printers that a budding hobbyist won't want to miss. The price of two popular Elegoo Neptune printers has dropped, with a discount of up to 35% available for buyers who are quick. You've got less than a day to grab these discounts before these beginner-friendly 3D printers shoot back up in price, however.

Both of these 3D printers are significantly cheaper than the prices you'll find at big retailers, including at Amazon. Elegoo's price drop means you can pick up the Neptune 3 Pro for just $169, while the Neptune 4 Plus is priced at only $309. We've tested and scored both printers highly in past reviews, with a near-perfect 4.5 stars for both, with each delivering a strong set of features that pros and beginners will love.

This budget-friendly 3D printer comes with a direct drive suitable for use with TPU, PETG, and PLA, auto bed leveling, and a heated flex PEI textured platform, making it easy to use. Assembly takes less than an hour (seven screws) and produces clean, detailed prints.

See our Elegoo Neptune 3 Pro review for more performance details.View Deal

The Elegoo Neptune 3 Pro is the older and cheaper model, but it's still a workhorse worth considering. Our Neptune 3 Pro review back in 2022 saw us shower it with praise over its auto-leveling abilities, direct drive, and quiet operation overall. It's an easy printer to assemble and start using, which makes it a good option for beginners. The direct drive extruder, meanwhile, means it's fine with difficult-to-use filaments like TPU, with a (fairly standard) 225 x 225 x 2280 build volume to work with.

Auto-leveling, along with its heated PEI build platform, round out the Neptune 3 as a good start option for someone looking to start printing models at home.

The Elegoo Neptune 4 Plus is a large 3D printer sporting a 320 x 320 x 385 build volume, perfect for cosplayers and those who want to print big.

Faster printing requires better cooling and the Neptune 4 Plus shares the same ludicrously large part cooling fan as the Pro, meaning this 3D printer will speed through your projects while keeping the quality finish that you expect.View Deal

Meanwhile, our Elegoo Neptune 4 Plus review proves what a strong option this more advanced model is for anyone looking to print on a larger scale. It has a dual-gear direct drive extruder, but the MVP is its huge 230 x 230 x 285mm build size. That makes this Elegoo printer a sheer powerhouse for printing, and a standout choice for any creators who are looking for speed and scale without a huge budget.

This is a premium option over the Neptune 3 Pro, and it comes with extra features like acceleration sensors, integrated Wi-Fi connectivity, and uses the popular open-source firmware for control, making it better to use.

Choosing either of these Elegoo Neptune printers won't leave you disappointed. Beginners can start off with the Neptune 3 Pro, a great 3D printer for someone looking for a well-spec'd 3D printer that's easy to assemble and use. If your funds stretch a little higher, you can go for the Neptune 4 Plus instead, a feature-filled upgrade for larger models.

The sale prices of $169 for the Neptune 3 Pro and $309 for the Neptune 4 Plus make these Elegoo 3D printers affordable and accessible, especially for somebody who hasn't owned one before. These discounts are ending soon, with the Neptune 3 Pro set to go back up in price in less than a day. If you're interested, you're going to need to be quick to secure these sale prices for yourself.

Scientists Turn Sound Into a New Propulsion System for Tiny Microrobots

19 August 2026 at 14:00

Using the same basic physics based on the familiar hollow tone produced by blowing across an empty bottle, researchers in Switzerland have developed a sound-powered propulsion system that can steer microrobots and even lift tiny machines.

In a new study published in Science Advances, engineers at the Swiss Federal Institute of Technology Lausanne (EPFL) demonstrated that 3D-printed cavities known as Helmholtz resonators can convert sound into directed jets of air and usable thrust.

The researchers built devices ranging from centimeters down to micrometers, used sound to propel and steer tiny boats, and created two microscopic flying machines—one microrobot lifted directly by acoustic thrust and another using rapidly spinning rotor blades. One version generated nearly five times its own weight in thrust, while another spun at up to 13,000 revolutions per minute to produce aerodynamic thrust.

The work points to a new way to power small robots without conventional motors, while also exposing the considerable engineering problems that remain before such machines can operate autonomously.

“While acoustic resonators have been extensively studied in liquids for the realization of untethered microrobots, their implementation in air remains largely unexplored,” researchers write. “The actuation scheme is compatible with even further miniaturization, pushing the boundaries of robotics and aeronautics.”

The idea behind the technology is surprisingly familiar. Blow across the top of an empty bottle and you hear a deep, hollow note created as the air trapped inside begins to vibrate.

Known as Helmholtz resonance, the effect happens because the air inside the bottle and its narrow opening behave somewhat like a mass attached to a spring. When sound at the right frequency excites a specially designed resonator, those vibrations become much stronger, forcing air rapidly through the opening. The resulting airflow can form a directional jet powerful enough to generate thrust.

The researchers set out to harness the same physics behind Helmholtz resonance as an unconventional propulsion method for microrobots.

The researchers designed tiny cavities that take advantage of the same principle. When sound hits one of these resonators at just the right frequency, the air in its narrow neck begins moving rapidly back and forth.

Because that airflow is slightly uneven as it enters and exits, it creates a small but focused jet of air. That jet produces thrust, giving the resonator enough force to help move or even lift a microrobot.

The team 3D-printed resonators ranging from centimeter to micrometer scales, designing them to respond to frequencies between roughly 200 hertz and 40 kilohertz. Experiments showed that larger cavities generally produced greater thrust, while the geometry and thickness of the resonator’s neck played a particularly important role in determining performance.

Importantly, researchers could tune different resonators to different frequencies. That means sound does more than supply power; frequency can effectively serve as a control signal.

The researchers demonstrated the concept using miniature boats equipped with acoustic resonators. One early prototype carried a resonator tuned to 1.2 kilohertz and moved only when exposed to sound at that frequency.

More advanced versions used separate resonators for propulsion and steering, allowing the researchers to guide a boat around obstacles remotely and along a figure-eight course with a mean tracking error of just 5.70 millimeters.

The team also showed that an external speaker is not always necessary. By attaching small vibration transducers directly to resonators, they could send sound through the robot’s structure itself.

This approach allowed the researchers to build a fully integrated boat equipped with its own battery, control electronics, and acoustic transducers. Bluetooth commands activated resonators tuned for propulsion and steering, with a total communication latency of about 30 milliseconds. The boat successfully traced the letters “EPFL,” navigated past obstacles, and could be steered back on course after researchers deliberately disturbed it by blowing air or physically pushing it.

However, shrinking the technology into flying microrobots provided the study’s most striking demonstration.

One microflier consisted of three microscopic resonators operating at 40 kilohertz and weighed only about 150 micrograms. Focused ultrasound caused each resonator to eject a tiny jet of air downward. Together, the three produced a thrust-to-weight ratio of approximately 4.9. The machine accelerated upward, climbed roughly 12 millimeters before settling around seven millimeters above its starting position.

A second design took a different approach. Instead of pointing the acoustic jets downward, the researchers used them to spin a rotor fitted with tiny aerodynamic blades. The entire aircraft weighed 184 micrograms.

Once exposed to ultrasound, the rotor accelerated to approximately 13,000 rpm. Its blades generated enough aerodynamic thrust for takeoff before settling to roughly 6,500 rpm while hovering.

Turning the device upside down prevented it from ascending, helping confirm that aerodynamic thrust, rather than acoustic radiation pressure alone, enabled flight.

Researchers demonstrated unconstrained flight with both microrobot designs. The direct-thrust version climbed rapidly but sometimes flipped in the air. The spinning version was more stable, apparently because its swift rotation provided a gyroscopic stabilizing effect similar to that found in helicopters and spinning discs.

Ultimately, the experiments remain proof-of-concept demonstrations rather than prototypes of free-ranging autonomous microrobots. Airborne propulsion requires external acoustic hardware capable of keeping a sufficiently strong sound field focused on a tiny moving object. That essentially limits the robot’s operating area. Putting the acoustic source onboard offers greater autonomy but might significantly increase the robot’s weight.

The current flying system also operates at a single 40-kilohertz frequency, restricting how independently its resonators can be controlled. The researchers suggest future multifrequency ultrasonic arrays could selectively activate different resonators, allowing small aircraft to steer and coordinate their movement through sound alone.

Further miniaturization is technically possible. Modern 3D nanoprinting can fabricate structures with resolutions around 700 nanometers, possibly allowing resonators only several micrometers across. However, at those scales, viscous forces become increasingly important and may dramatically reduce thrust, meaning simply shrinking the existing design may eventually stop working.

Still, the wider concept could go beyond flying machines. Researchers envision flexible structures containing many differently tuned resonators that can bend, vibrate, or change shape depending on the applied sound frequency, possibly resulting in shape-morphing microrobots and mechanical metamaterials.

“Our work extends the concept of acoustic manipulation toward active propulsion by harnessing cavity resonance to generate directional thrust and controlled motion,” the researchers write. “This approach broadens the scope of airborne acoustic actuation toward small-scale robots capable of autonomous operation in open environments.”

The recent study, “Acoustic Resonators as Wireless Actuators in Air for Small-Scale Robots,” was published in Science Advances. 

Tim McMillan is a retired law enforcement executive, investigative reporter and co-founder of The Debrief. His writing typically focuses on defense, national security, the Intelligence Community and topics related to psychology. You can follow Tim on Twitter: @LtTimMcMillan.  Tim can be reached by email: tim@thedebrief.org or through encrypted email: LtTimMcMillan@protonmail.com 

Porous Reaction-Bonded Silicon Nitride: Size Effects in Pressureless Nitriding of Binder-Jetted Silicon

9 August 2026 at 03:56

A quiet shift in silicon manufacturing could be taking shape inside a new study on porous reaction-bonded silicon nitride, a ceramic material valued for its strength, thermal stability and resistance to chemical attack. Researchers T.G. Aguirre, E. Cakmak, M.D. Richardson and colleagues are investigating how the size of additively manufactured silicon components affects their conversion into silicon nitride through a pressureless nitriding process. Published in npj Advanced Manufacturing, the work connects binder jet 3D printing with a manufacturing route that could make complex ceramic structures easier to produce.

The central idea is deceptively simple: print a component from silicon powder, then expose it to nitrogen so that the silicon reacts and forms silicon nitride. In practice, however, the transformation is governed by a network of interacting physical and chemical processes. Nitrogen must penetrate the part, reach reactive silicon surfaces and diffuse through newly formed ceramic layers. Heat must also move through the structure, while gases generated or trapped during processing must escape. As component dimensions change, these processes can behave very differently.

Binder jet additive manufacturing offers a distinctive route for creating such parts. Instead of melting powder with a laser or electron beam, the process selectively deposits a liquid binder to join powder particles layer by layer. The resulting “green” component is then typically dried and thermally treated to remove the binder, leaving a fragile, porous body. For silicon-based structures, that interconnected porosity can become a processing advantage, allowing nitrogen to travel through the material during the subsequent reaction.

The researchers’ focus on size effects addresses a major challenge in scaling ceramic additive manufacturing from laboratory specimens to useful components. A thin printed sample may nitridize relatively quickly because nitrogen has only a short distance to travel. A thicker or larger part presents a far more demanding environment. Its interior can receive nitrogen more slowly, and the reaction front may progress unevenly from the outer surface inward. Differences in heating rate, temperature distribution and gas transport can produce variations in conversion, density and final microstructure.

The term “pressureless nitriding” is crucial to the study’s technological appeal. Many advanced ceramic manufacturing methods depend on external pressure, specialized furnaces or high-energy consolidation steps to achieve the desired structure. A pressureless route instead relies on controlled heating and the chemical affinity between silicon and nitrogen. If the reaction can be managed uniformly, manufacturers could potentially create intricate silicon nitride components without applying mechanical pressure during conversion, simplifying equipment requirements and expanding the range of printable geometries.

Silicon nitride is an especially attractive target because it combines several properties that are difficult to obtain in a single engineering material. It can withstand high temperatures, resist wear and corrosion, and maintain useful mechanical performance under demanding conditions. Those characteristics have made silicon nitride relevant to applications ranging from bearings and cutting tools to heat-resistant components and advanced energy systems. A porous version offers additional possibilities, including lightweight structures, filtration, thermal management and engineered surfaces where controlled pathways through the material are valuable.

The study’s attention to porosity is equally important. In reaction-bonded ceramics, pores are not merely defects; they can serve as channels for reactant transport. At the same time, excessive or poorly distributed porosity can weaken the final component and interfere with complete conversion. The scientific challenge is therefore to balance openness and strength. The printed silicon body must remain permeable enough for nitrogen to reach its interior, while the reaction must generate a coherent silicon nitride framework rather than leaving unreacted silicon or creating damaging gradients.

By examining components of different sizes, the researchers are addressing a question with direct implications for industrial design: can processing rules developed for small printed samples be applied to larger parts? The answer depends on how reaction kinetics, diffusion and heat transfer scale with geometry. A process that appears reliable in a small coupon may produce a different result in a thick wall, enclosed channel or complex lattice. Understanding those differences can help engineers determine allowable dimensions, optimize furnace schedules and design structures around the chemistry of nitridation rather than treating manufacturing as a purely geometric exercise.

The broader significance of the work lies in the convergence of three fields: powder-based additive manufacturing, reaction-bonded ceramics and transport-driven materials processing. Instead of printing a finished ceramic directly, the approach uses additive manufacturing to create a carefully engineered precursor and then transforms it chemically. That strategy could unlock shapes that are difficult to machine from dense silicon nitride, while reducing the need for conventional molds and tooling. As manufacturers seek lighter, more complex and more resource-efficient components, controlling size-dependent reactions may become as important as improving printer resolution.

The research arrives at a moment when additive manufacturing is moving beyond demonstrations of intricate shapes toward repeatable production of functional materials. Its emphasis on pressureless nitriding of binder jet additively manufactured silicon highlights a practical bottleneck often hidden behind spectacular 3D-printing images: the printed object is only the beginning. The final performance depends on what happens during post-processing, when gases, heat and chemical reactions determine the internal structure. By clarifying how component size influences that transformation, Aguirre, Cakmak, Richardson and their collaborators are helping map a route from powder and binder to porous silicon nitride parts designed for the high-temperature technologies of the future.

Subject of Research: Porous reaction-bonded silicon nitride produced through pressureless nitriding of binder jet additively manufactured silicon, with a focus on size effects.

Article Title: Porous reaction-bonded silicon nitride: Size effects for pressureless nitriding of binder jet additively manufactured silicon

Article References: Aguirre, T.G., Cakmak, E., Richardson, M.D. et al. “Porous reaction-bonded silicon nitride: Size effects for pressureless nitriding of binder jet additively manufactured silicon.” npj Advanced Manufacturing (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s44334-026-00110-y

Image Credits: AI Generated

DOI: 10.1038/s44334-026-00110-y

Keywords: Silicon nitride, reaction-bonded ceramics, pressureless nitriding, binder jet additive manufacturing, silicon, porous materials, size effects.

Scientists Develop New 3D Printing Method That Can Build Directly Onto Existing Objects in Seconds

4 August 2026 at 16:54

Researchers have demonstrated an unusual new form of 3D printing capable of building entirely new structures directly onto—and even around—existing objects in just seconds. In a series of experiments, the technique printed microscopic fluid channels around embedded glass spheres, fabricated precision gears onto polished steel rods, and even built a miniature lens directly onto the surface of a working LED.

The breakthrough, described in a paper published in Nature Communications, relies on an advanced form of tomographic volumetric additive manufacturing (TVAM) that allows researchers to “overprint” new structures onto components made from a wide range of materials, including metal, glass, and preassembled microfluidic components. Instead of constructing objects layer by layer like conventional 3D printers, the system projects precisely calculated light patterns into a rotating vat of photosensitive resin, causing an entire three-dimensional object to solidify almost simultaneously within seconds.

The advancement could represent a major step toward making volumetric 3D printing practical in real-world manufacturing environments, where new components often must be integrated with parts that already exist.

It additionally highlights the growing sophistication of computational techniques that can accurately model how light behaves as it passes through materials that absorb, scatter, refract, or reflect light.

“Tomographic Volumetric Additive Manufacturing (TVAM) is a light-based 3D printing technique capable of producing centimeter-scale objects within seconds,” researchers write. “This work demonstrates a broad range of overprinting scenarios, where new structures are directly printed onto or around pre-existing components made from different materials.”

Unlike conventional stereolithography or fused-filament printers that gradually build an object from one direction, tomographic volumetric printing projects hundreds of two-dimensional light patterns into a rotating container filled with liquid resin.

As the resin accumulates enough light energy, the desired three-dimensional structure appears almost simultaneously throughout the volume rather than emerging layer by layer. The approach can produce centimeter-scale objects in mere seconds.

However, until now, one of the technology’s greatest challenges has been accurately calculating how light travels through complicated environments.

Existing objects inside the resin can block, scatter, or bend incoming light, degrading print quality. Conventional models often assume these objects are either completely transparent or completely opaque. This is an oversimplification that breaks down in realistic manufacturing scenarios.

To overcome those limitations, the team developed an upgraded computational framework called Dr.TVAM. Built upon physically based ray tracing, the software models how light propagates through materials with different optical properties while simultaneously optimizing the projected light patterns needed to create the desired object.

Because the framework accounts for reflection, refraction, scattering, absorption, and arbitrary container shapes, it can successfully print structures around components that previously would have interfered with the process.

One of the study’s most compelling demonstrations involved manufacturing microfluidic channels directly inside sealed, preassembled square chambers. Microfluidic devices contain microscopic channels that transport tiny volumes of liquids and are widely used in biomedical research, diagnostics, and organ-on-a-chip systems.

Instead of fabricating the channels separately and assembling the device afterward—a process that can introduce contamination or leaks—the researchers successfully printed perfusable channels directly inside an already assembled chamber while accounting for inlet and outlet structures that would otherwise obstruct the light.

They demonstrated straight channels, branching networks, and spiral geometries capable of carrying fluid after fabrication. Supplementary demonstrations showed colored dye successfully flowing through the finished structures.

The researchers then pushed the concept even further by creating what they describe as context-aware printing. In this experiment, they embedded two tiny glass spheres inside a hydrogel-filled chamber, rapidly determined each sphere’s three-dimensional position using two camera images, and generated customized print patterns in less than a minute.

Those optimized projections produced hollow channels connecting each sphere to inlet and outlet ports while simultaneously printing protective cavities around the spheres themselves. The complete workflow—from detecting the embedded objects to generating printing instructions and fabricating the final structure—required less than three minutes.

That ability could eventually enable highly customized biomedical manufacturing, where printers automatically adapt to the precise location of living tissues, organoids, or other biological materials rather than requiring perfect positioning beforehand.

Another experiment highlighted why precisely modeling light matters.

Previous demonstrations of volumetric overprinting treated metal components as though they completely absorbed incoming light. In reality, polished metal reflects and scatters significant amounts of light, creating distortions that reduce print quality.

Researchers tested both assumptions by printing a gear directly onto a polished steel rod. When the software ignored scattered light, the gear’s fine holes became over-polymerized and poorly defined.

After including realistic scattering behavior into the optical model, however, the resulting gear preserved those elaborate features far more accurately, increasing simulated print fidelity substantially. The improvement was confirmed experimentally.

Researchers even went as far as demonstrating that the process could print directly onto an electronic component.

Using an LED-based volumetric printing system, the researchers fabricated both a miniature lens and a small cross-shaped symbol directly onto the surface of a red LED. When illuminated, the printed lens projected the symbol onto a screen, successfully transforming the LED into a tiny optical projector without requiring additional assembly. The experiment showcased how optical elements themselves could potentially be integrated directly onto existing electronic hardware during manufacturing.

Beyond the individual demonstrations, the work additionally underscores an important trend in additive manufacturing: increasingly sophisticated software is becoming just as important as advances in hardware.

Instead of relying on simplified mathematical approximations, the new framework performs physically based optical simulations capable of modeling arbitrary geometries along with material properties.

The software has been released as open source, along with configuration files and experimental data, allowing other researchers to reproduce and expand upon the 3D printing work.

Although the current demonstrations remain laboratory-scale, the possible implications could extend well beyond experimental 3D printing. Biomedical researchers could eventually fabricate sterile microfluidic systems without multi-step assembly. Optical engineers may integrate lenses directly onto light sources. Manufacturers could add custom features to finished components without redesigning entire production processes.

Researchers also note that future improvements could further increase realism through incorporating additional physical effects, including changes in refractive index during polymerization and the diffusion of chemical inhibitors during printing. Those refinements could expand the technology’s accuracy and enable even more complex manufacturing scenarios.

“In summary, Dr.TVAM, our computational framework, has shown to be capable of modeling different optical situations for TVAM,” researchers write. “We believe this significantly expands the application space for TVAM, enabling the creation of complex, functionalized, and multi-component devices from applications in mechanics, optics, or biofabrication.”

Study: Wechsler F, et al. “Overprinting with tomographic volumetric additive manufacturing.” Nature Communications (2026).

Tim McMillan is a retired law enforcement executive, investigative reporter and co-founder of The Debrief. His writing typically focuses on defense, national security, the Intelligence Community and topics related to psychology. You can follow Tim on Twitter: @LtTimMcMillan.  Tim can be reached by email: tim@thedebrief.org or through encrypted email: LtTimMcMillan@protonmail.com 

'Nozzlegate' erupts as Prusa CORE One 3D printer kits arrive with soft steel nozzles — Bondtech admits machining flaws with no quick fix (Updated)

Bondtech, the inventor of the INDX toolchanger system used to create the highly anticipated Prusa CORE One+ INDX, admitted to a significant mistake. The nozzles, which are nitrocarburized steel, do not meet industry standards for “hardened steel” as advertised.

Prusa Research has pumped the brakes on the INDX project, and has delayed shipping INDX conversion kits until mid-August. They issued a statement on Reddit:

“Bondtech has recently confirmed that the nozzles currently supplied with the INDX system are surface-hardened rather than fully hardened as originally planned, and has not yet finalized the compensation plan for affected customers. We believe it is better to wait until both we and you have clearer information, rather than ship the kits while this important question remains unresolved.”

r/prusa3D

The statement was also emailed directly to everyone with an active INDX order in the system. The company said this delay will also give customers a chance to cancel their orders if they wish. As an olive branch, Prusa Research INDX conversion kits will included extra hardware free of charge. The statement didn’t say what the gift would be, but that specifics would be shared before shipping.

Prusa engineers immediately began testing the INDX nozzles and determined that little wear could be seen after running five kilograms of carbon fiber PETG through the nozzles. However, after just 100g of super-abrasive Ultraglow filament, the protective coating began to fail.

Nitrocarburized steel is tougher than the standard brass nozzles that come with a stock Prusa CORE One+, but not as durable as hardened steel. The real problem is not that they went with a lesser nozzle, but that they kept the “hardened steel” wording in promotional materials. If Bondtech said from the beginning (or before customers locked in their pre-orders) that the INDX shipped with ordinary steel nozzles, no one would have blinked.

Information on the nozzle quality began to surface after a Reddit user posted a support email from Bondtech founder, Martin Bondeus. The email stated that “during production, we encountered manufacturing challenges that prevented us from machining that material reliably – the cutting tools simply did not withstand the process. Rather than releasing a product with inconsistent quality, we decided to supply the nitrocarburized version for the time being.”

NozzleGate

Reddit (Image credit: Reddit)

These nozzles are not of poor quality, but they fall short of the standards set for hardened steel. According to a statement by Bondtech, the Founders Edition shipped with nitrocarburized steel, which is steel treated to obtain a hard shell. They’ve batch tested the nozzles and found them to be around 30-32 on the Hardness Rockwell C scale (HRC). For comparison, true hardened steel lands at 55-60 while an everyday brass nozzle comes in under 10 HRC.

For most users, and most materials, these mid-tier steel nozzles work exceptionally well and will last for an extremely long time. But once you start to feed your INDX abrasive filaments like glass-fiber, carbon-fiber, glow in the dark and metal filled filaments, things get dicey. The treated steel nozzles will last longer than brass, but Bondtech said they will experience “accelerated wear” when printing abrasives.

Bondtech has stated on its website that a “concrete solution” to the problem is not ready and that manufacturing truly hardened INDX nozzles could take months. They are also not offering any form of compensation before knowing the cost of the replacements. They are requesting that customers hold off on returning the kits and simply enjoy using non-abrasive materials until a solution is found.

The INDX takes a bespoke induction heated nozzle that has no off the shelf replacement at this time.

The news has hit the Founders Edition buyers quite hard, as many have already found difficulty with the kits they so eagerly purchased months ago. Some assembly problems can be expected with such a product, as they are being mounted on CORE One printers already in service. The INDX is a separate upgrade kit, and it requires stripping down a CORE One, removing the Nextruder and replacing it with the INDX carriage, then mounting a rack to hold the eight tool heads.

One “founder” was so upset he vibe coded an entire website in protest: Nozzlegate.com. The website outlines what the perceived problems are with Bondtech, and what consumers can do about it. We contacted the website owner, who asked to go by his handle “Daddie0.”

NozzleGate

Nozzlegate.com (Image credit: Tom's Hardware)

He told me that, like others who purchased Founder Edition kits, he’s disappointed in the quality of the product. He said his INDX was suffering from multiple mid-print crashes and layer shifts, and after two weeks of troubleshooting, it was finally fixed with a firmware update from Prusa. “Then nozzlegate hits. My EU right-given two-week return window ends a day after the news breaks.”

Realizing that his window for a standard, hassle-free return had closed on a machine he felt was a lemon, he shifted strategies. He began digging into Bondtech’s official documentation to see what recourse he had for a defective product.

What he found sparked a new battle. Disagreeing with Bondtech’s listed 90-day warranty policy, which he claims misleads consumers by failing to mention Sweden's mandatory multi-year consumer protections, he channeled his frustration into the NozzleGate website.

The INDX kit is a collaboration between Prusa Research and Bondtech, with the first wave of Founders Edition kits a limited edition run going to early adopters.

Tom’s Hardware received a Founders Edition INDX kit, which we installed on a Prusa CORE One we previously reviewed. Though the build took over the kitchen table for an entire weekend, our resulting INDX is printing non-abrasive filaments with excellent quality.

NozzleGate

(Image credit: Tom's Hardware)

New open source printer has 7 toolheads that swap in 5 seconds for fast, zero-waste multi-color 3D printing — Sovol M1D 3D printer is the first open-source IDEX design with an integrated tool-changer

We're quite familiar with Sovol 3D printers around these parts, having reviewed several models over the years and finding that pretty much all of them produce high-quality prints. The company is now stepping up its game with the Sovol M1D, an open-source, independent dual-extruder (IDEX) printer with two nozzles and seven toolheads, a maximum print volume of 300 x 300 x 350 mm (11.81" x 11.81" x 13.78").

This bit o' kit can operate its nozzles in true independent mode (rather than alternating between them), letting users copy prints for easily printing duplicates and mirror them for doing left-right versions. In multi-head mode, each nozzle can output a different material. The first nozzle has a fixed toolhead, while the second can swap between heads independently. The open-source nature of the printer ought to let it be easy to mod, and as expected, it relies on the OrcaSlicer software by default rather than proprietary software such as Bambu's offerings.

The M1D comes in two variants, Essential and Advanced, with the higher-end model having the same basic specs but coming in a heated enclosure that keep inside air at 60°C (140°F). Sovol says each nozzle can print at up to 600 mm/s, and accelerate at 10,000 mm/s². The nozzle-and-toolhead interface seems quite nifty, as the M1D ought to swap toolheads in just five seconds, and keeps the standby heads warm so they're ready for printing the second they attach to the nozzle. One of the heads is fixed, and the other six are interchangeable.

The combination of the speed and tool-swapping technology has Sovol claiming the M1D can perform multi-colored prints five times faster than "others," displaying what appears to be a Bambu P1S in the comparison pictures. Likewise, said multi-color or multi-material prints supposedly produce "almost zero waste."

The M1D has a number of measures to prevent failed prints, including automatic bed leveling with nozzle Z-axis compensation thanks to an eddy current sensor, X/Y nozzle cameras, vibration compensation, and a 720p chamber camera that will have AI obstruction and spaghetti detection in a future firmware update.

The seven toolheads allow for easily integrating water-soluble materials for printing sacrificial supports and molds, movable mechanisms, and hollow parts, while the enclosure of the Advanced version lets the M1D print particularly resistant materials like ASA (acrylonitrile styrene acrylate), PA (polyamide), and PC (polycarbonate).

The Sovol M1D is available through a Kickstarter project that's already pulled in over $2.8 million — many times over the initial $191,254 goal. Buying into a crowdfunded project frequently elicits concern, but Sovol's track record has historically been pretty good. With early bird pricing and not accounting for shipping costs, the M1D Essential goes for $1,299, while the Advanced version with the heated enclosure costs $1,599. The printers are expected to start shipping in November.

If You Own a 3D Printer, You Absolutely Need to Try Hi3D

31 July 2026 at 11:20

In the 3D printing community, there’s a common saying: buying a 3D printer is easy—learning modeling, mesh repair, and slicer settings is the real challenge.

While AI-powered 3D generation has made it possible to create detailed models in minutes, turning those models into successful prints still requires significant technical work. From mesh repair and model splitting to print optimization and multi-color workflow management, many AI-generated models never make it beyond the screen.

Hi3D was built to close that gap between AI creation and physical manufacturing. Over the past year, the company has expanded beyond AI model generation, developing an end-to-end workflow designed specifically for 3D printing.

Today, Hi3D has established partnerships across the digital fabrication ecosystem, including Creality, MakerWorld within the Bambu Lab ecosystem, and xTool. These collaborations enable deeper integrations for printable model generation, AMS multi-color workflows, enhanced 3MF output, and broader digital manufacturing applications.

Hi3D

(Image credit: Hi3D)

With its anniversary release, Hi3D takes another step forward. Automated part separation, multi-color optimization, color cleanup, material-saving algorithms, intelligent model orientation, and print parameter generation are now unified into a single AI-driven workflow.

The result is simple: tasks that once required multiple software tools and hours of manual work can now be completed automatically—helping creators move from image to printable object faster than ever before.

Hours to 2 Minutes: Auto Character Split with Built-In Print-Ready Tolerances

For makers printing large models—or working with smaller build volumes such as the A1 mini—model splitting is often one of the most time-consuming steps. Traditional workflows require manually cutting meshes, creating connection structures, and adjusting tolerances, often resulting in assembly issues after printing.

Hi3D’s Auto Character Split automates the entire process:

  1. Intelligent Topology Recognition – Automatically identifies heads, torsos, limbs, and other structural components, generating optimized printable segments.
  2. Watertight Mesh Generation – Every separated part is exported as a closed, watertight mesh ready for slicing and printing.
  3. One-Click Joint Creation – Users can instantly add snap-fit connectors, mortise-and-tenon structures, or articulated ball joints for movable figures.
  4. AI-Optimized Assembly Tolerances – Mechanical clearances are automatically calibrated for FDM printing, enabling reliable assembly directly off the build plate with minimal post-processing.

Tasks that previously required hours of manual modeling and adjustment can now be completed in just a few minutes.

Hi3D

(Image credit: Hi3D)

Deep Integration with the Bambu/AMS Ecosystem: From AI Model to Print-Ready 3MF

Multi-color printing often requires extensive manual color painting and parameter adjustments, especially for complex AI-generated models. Color data can be lost during export, and preparing a print-ready file typically involves multiple software steps.

Hi3D streamlines this process through deep integration with the Bambu Lab ecosystem, featuring an official filament library, automatic color mapping, and enhanced 3MF generation.

Once a model is created, Hi3D automatically maps on-screen colors to official Bambu Lab filament profiles and exports an optimized 3MF file containing print settings such as temperatures, layer heights, infill density, wall parameters, and support configurations.

Hi3D

(Image credit: Hi3D)

Instead of manually preparing files in a slicer, users can send the generated 3MF directly to Bambu Studio or OrcaSlicer and start printing immediately.

Reduce Multi-Color Waste by Up to 50% with AI Color Cleanup

For users of Bambu AMS and other multi-material systems, excessive filament purging remains one of the biggest challenges in multi-color printing. AI-generated textures often contain tiny color fragments and gradient noise, triggering unnecessary filament swaps that increase print time and material waste.

Hi3D addresses this with its Color Cleanup algorithm:

  • Noise-Aware Color Merging – Automatically detects and removes insignificant color fragments generated by AI textures.
  • Reduced Filament Swaps – Minimizes unnecessary color changes during slicing.
  • Lower Cost, Faster Prints – Reduces purge waste by up to 50% while improving print efficiency by 30–50%.

Smart Build Plate Layout for Higher Print Success Rates

Model orientation is often the deciding factor in print quality and reliability. Hi3D’s Smart Build Plate Layout system automatically analyzes geometry, center of gravity, and support requirements to optimize model placement.

  • Surface-First Mode – Prioritizes visible surfaces to reduce support marks and post-processing.
  • Eco-Support Mode – Minimizes support usage while maximizing bed adhesion and print stability.

By automating decisions that traditionally rely on maker experience, Hi3D helps users achieve better print quality with less trial and error.

Hi3D
Hi3D
Hi3D
Hi3D

Bridging the Gap: From Beginner-Friendly Creation to Advanced Manufacturing

Beyond advanced tools for model splitting, multi-color optimization, and print preparation, Hi3D also lowers the barrier to entry through its Maker Templates. Users can upload a photo to generate printable figurines, pet models, or custom keycaps that are automatically optimized for 3D printing.

With its anniversary release, Hi3D is expanding beyond AI model generation into a complete AI-powered workflow built specifically for physical manufacturing. By combining AI creation, print optimization, and hardware-aware automation in a single platform, Hi3D helps creators move from idea to finished object with significantly less manual work.

As AI 3D technology continues to mature, the industry is shifting from simply generating models to generating manufacturing-ready models. Hi3D’s latest update represents another step toward that future, making 3D printing more accessible for beginners while providing greater efficiency for experienced makers.

Ready to experience a smoother workflow from AI-generated models to successful 3D prints? Visit Hi3D.ai and see how AI-powered creation, optimization, and printing come together in a single platform.

New users can receive 300 free Hi3D credits through the link below and experience the complete AI-to-3D-print workflow for themselves—from concept generation to printable 3MF files.

Get started here:Hi3D.ai

Scientists Build the First 3D Cloak That Makes Objects Invisible To Heat

3D Printed, Hybrid Aluminum and Rubber Cloaking DeviceA new 3D material can guide heat around complex objects while shielding them from extreme temperatures and infrared detection. On an infrared camera, a warm object normally stands out clearly against cooler surroundings. Researchers have now built a three-dimensional cloak that bends heat around an object, erasing its thermal outline while protecting the space inside [...]
❌