❌

Reading view

Apple tem pedido para suspender caso contra a Epic nos EUA negado

A Apple novamente não conseguiu obter a suspensão do processo de cálculo de taxas para compras a partir de links externos em sua disputa judicial contra a Epic Games. O caso, como já informamos, será analisado pela Suprema Corte dos Estados Unidos em algum momento a partir de outubro — e a Maçã havia solicitado ao Tribunal Distrital Norte da Califórnia que suspendesse os trâmites até lá, mas o tribunal negou o pedido.

As informações foram divulgadas no X por Tim Sweeney, fundador e CEO 1Chief executive officer, ou diretor executivo. da Epic.

Apple's stay was denied! Now they have 24 hours to file their proposed menu of junk fees with The Court, and Epic will have 60 days to file our legal analysis in advance of a court hearing on the topic.

— Tim Sweeney (@TimSweeneyEpic) August 11, 2026
O pedido de suspensão da Apple foi negado! Agora, a empresa tem 24 horas para apresentar ao tribunal sua proposta de lista de taxas abusivas, e a Epic terá 60 dias para protocolar sua análise jurídica antes da audiência sobre o assunto.

Como também apontado por Sweeney, a Apple tem agora 24 horas para apresentar ao tribunal um esboço das taxas que pretende cobrar dos desenvolvedores pelo uso de opções de pagamento alternativas e por links externos para compras realizadas na web. A Epic poderá, dentro de 60 dias, apresentar uma análise da proposta de taxas da Maçã — e o tribunal decidirá o que deverá valer.

Sweeney fez uma segunda publicação sobre o imbróglio, questionando se a Apple vai “documentar honestamente seus custos com o tempo de revisores humanos e tentar recuperá-los?”. Alternativamente, ele sugere que a Apple pode “inventar noções novas e absurdas de custo, até então desconhecidas pela humanidade”.

Will Apple honestly document their costs for human reviewer time and seek to recoup them? Or fabricate outlandish new notions of cost previously unknown to mankind? Tune in 24 hours from now to find out.

— Tim Sweeney (@TimSweeneyEpic) August 11, 2026

Será que a Apple documentará honestamente os custos com o tempo de revisores humanos e tentará recuperá-los? Ou inventará noções de custo absurdas e inéditas para a humanidade? Fique ligado: a resposta virá daqui a 24 horas.

O desenrolar mais recente, cabe lembrar, faz parte de uma decisão na qual a Apple foi considerada em desacato por impor uma comissão de 27% sobre compras realizadas por meio de links externos, depois que a juíza Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers determinou que a empresa permitisse aos desenvolvedores direcionar os usuários para métodos de pagamento alternativos.

A Apple recorreu à Suprema Corte contra a referida decisão, que concordou em analisar o caso. A Maçã, em seguida, solicitou à magistrada a suspensão do processo na instância inferior, argumentando que a (futura) decisão da Suprema Corte poderá afetar qualquer trabalho realizado nesse meio-tempo.

A Apple (ainda) não comentou a decisão de hoje.

via AppleInsider

Notas de rodapé

  • 1
    Chief executive officer, ou diretor executivo.

  •  

Following Epic loss, Google has started hosting rival app stores in the Play Store

A new day has dawned in the Play Store, and it's one that Google tried very hard to avoid. The first third-party app store has arrived in Google Play as a result of the long-running antitrust lawsuit with Epic. Those in the US can now head into Google Play and download Aptoide, a game-focused store that has been available as a sideloaded client since the early days of Android.

Forcing Google to distribute third-party app stores in Google Play was one of several remedies imposed by Judge James Donato after Epic emerged victorious in 2023. The remedies also included lowering developer fees, mirroring Google Play apps in other app stores, and allowing developers to use alternative payment systems. But it was the app store stipulation that seemed to irk Google the most.

Google almost avoided this outcome when it agreed to a settlement with Epic, which was announced early this year. Under the terms, Google would certify third-party app stores to allow users to install and use them with less friction, but it would not host them in Google Play. However, Google and Epic withdrew the settlement when it appeared the court would not approve it. This Registered App Store program is still slated to launch internationally, but in the US, Google is only doing what it must to comply with the judge's orders.

Read full article

Comments

© Mateusz Slodkowski/SOPA Images/LightRocket via Getty Images

  •  

Following Epic loss, Google has started hosting rival app stores in the Play Store

A new day has dawned in the Play Store, and it's one that Google tried very hard to avoid. The first third-party app store has arrived in Google Play as a result of the long-running antitrust lawsuit with Epic. Those in the US can now head into Google Play and download Aptoide, a game-focused store that has been available as a sideloaded client since the early days of Android.

Forcing Google to distribute third-party app stores in Google Play was one of several remedies imposed by Judge James Donato after Epic emerged victorious in 2023. The remedies also included lowering developer fees, mirroring Google Play apps in other app stores, and allowing developers to use alternative payment systems. But it was the app store stipulation that seemed to irk Google the most.

Google almost avoided this outcome when it agreed to a settlement with Epic, which was announced early this year. Under the terms, Google would certify third-party app stores to allow users to install and use them with less friction, but it would not host them in Google Play. However, Google and Epic withdrew the settlement when it appeared the court would not approve it. This Registered App Store program is still slated to launch internationally, but in the US, Google is only doing what it must to comply with the judge's orders.

Read full article

Comments

© Mateusz Slodkowski/SOPA Images/LightRocket via Getty Images

  •  
❌