Power banks are getting smarter, with the latest models at IFA 2026 using active cooling to sustain faster wireless charging while keeping heat under control.
(via Cult of Mac - Your source for the latest Apple news, rumors, analysis, reviews, how-tos and deals.)
Ugreen's latest MagFlow Pro chargers use active cooling to keep your iPhone cool while delivering up to 25W wireless fast charging.
(via Cult of Mac - Your source for the latest Apple news, rumors, analysis, reviews, how-tos and deals.)
Have you ever experienced a severe weather event, like a hurricane or a tornado? Researchers have shown that climate change is causing such weather events to become more extreme and more frequent, destroying communities and infrastructure. To determine which areas are most at risk, researchers from Canada studied the environmental effects of a powerful flooding event that occurred in southwestern British Columbia (BC) in November 2021.
They focused on a type of severe flooding event that is characteristic of the North American Pacific coastal region, called an atmospheric river. An atmospheric river occurs when a long, narrow vapor cloud flows toward land from the Pacific Ocean, causing heavy rainstorms. In November 2021, an atmospheric river in southwestern BC destroyed numerous regional highways, pipelines, power lines, and railways within its path. Over 18,000 people were evacuated due to flooding, and 6 people died.
The team explained that before the storm, BC experienced a severe drought and an unprecedented heatwave, followed by widespread thunderstorm activity. In 2021, lightning and human activity caused nearly 1,000 wildfires, which led to the third-worst wildfire season ever recorded in BC, partially because trees grow back slowly in forests that have been cut down or harvested. Poor vegetation recovery makes harvested forests more vulnerable to wildfires than old-growth forests. The November atmospheric river occurred shortly after this wildfire season.
To determine how the atmospheric river impacted southwestern BC, the researchers analyzed approximately 70,000 square kilometers (27,027 square miles) of affected area. They compared satellite images of southwestern BC from Google Earth, Sentinel, and Landsat taken before and after the event to detect changes in river channels and identify geohazards, like landslides and debris flows. They also used satellite images and Canadian government data to identify which forests had been harvested within the study area. The researchers then traversed the area to confirm their remote analyses.
The researchers used a type of 3D remote sensing, called light detection and ranging, or lidar, to measure how the 2021 atmospheric river redistributed sediment in the Coquihalla and Coldwater River valleys. With the help of lidar, the researchers discovered that both rivers had severely unstable banks due to erosion from the flooding event. Along the Coquihalla River, approximately 53,000 cubic meters (1,871,677 cubic feet) of sediment were eroded, while nearly 50,000 cubic meters (1,765,733 cubic feet) of sediment were eroded along the Coldwater River.
The researchers also found that hillslope geohazards increased the volume of sediment in both rivers. And in some cases, upstream areas with a history of forest harvesting and wildfires also affected stable banks downstream. For example, they identified debris flows on an unstable hillslope that triggered a landslide on a riverbank downstream. They observed that the river and stream channels shifted due to a sudden addition of sediment from hillslope geohazards and floodwater during the event.
In total, the researchers documented over 1,300 geohazards along 47 kilometers (about 30 miles) of the Coquihalla River and 19 kilometers (about 12 miles) of the Coldwater River and nearby creeks. Nearly half of the geohazards originated in an area with a history of wildfires or forest harvesting. Of the 155 geohazards at the Coquilhalla River, 43% occurred below forest harvesting resource roads, and of the 117 geohazards observed at the Coldwater River, 29% originated in areas with past wildfires.
The researchers suggested that their findings could help scientists predict where severe geohazards will occur during extreme weather events, since both watersheds had geohazards originating in harvested forests. Before 2000, clear-cutting was a widespread practice in BC, and the team’s results demonstrate that unsustainable harvesting practices like this can have lasting environmental impacts.
The researchers concluded that both forest harvesting and wildfires contributed to the severe impacts of the November 2021 atmospheric river, causing catastrophic landslides and debris flows to occur in traditionally dry regions. They suggested that more accurate risk assessments can better equip communities for severe weather events like this. While the next atmospheric river that lands in the Pacific coastal region may be worse than the last, this study can inform scientists and communities about which areas it might affect most.
The post Wildfires and forest harvesting worsen severe weather impacts appeared first on Sciworthy.
Chargeasap’s keyring-size Miko puts a 30W USB-C charger and cable within easy reach whenever your iPhone runs low on power.
(via Cult of Mac - Your source for the latest Apple news, rumors, analysis, reviews, how-tos and deals.)
Read our detailed ReelCharge ReelPro 200W Power Bank review to discover its real-world performance with Apple products.
(via Cult of Mac - Your source for the latest Apple news, rumors, analysis, reviews, how-tos and deals.)
There's a simple way to do age verification checks online which respect privacy without spending millions on another failed government IT project. So obviously we won't do it, says Phil Hendren.
The post The Right Way to Do Age Verification Checks appeared first on The Daily Sceptic.
The evolution of land plants about 450 million years ago altered many of Earth’s geologic processes, like weathering and erosion. Due to the lack of evidence for meandering rivers before then, past scientists hypothesized that plants could have caused straight rivers to meander. However, in recent decades, researchers have challenged this idea. They’ve suggested that plants could have changed rivers without causing them to meander.
To understand how vegetation changed rivers in the past, researchers recently studied 49 modern meandering rivers. They sorted these rivers into 3 categories – vegetated, unvegetated, and semi-vegetated – by analyzing color images taken of them from the air. They identified 18 vegetated rivers located in South America, 24 unvegetated rivers in the western United States, and 7 semi-vegetated rivers in China and the Eastern United States.
To examine the impact of plants on these rivers, the researchers quantified how much each river channel curves, known as its sinuosity. They used opposite banks of each river bend to find its center point, then, using digital maps, drew a line along the river’s trajectory at an equal distance between the bend center points. They used this line to calculate the angle between the river’s curve and the center point. This angle, called the migration angle, shows how a river bend relates to the river’s downstream direction. By measuring it, researchers can tell whether a river is developing more vertically or horizontally, and how sharp its bends are, either of which could be influenced by plants.
The researchers compared migration angles across each river system to determine how river bends varied between vegetated and unvegetated rivers. They found that vegetated rivers tend to deposit sediments in the river bend, leading to curvier bends that develop horizontally and widen over time. In contrast, unvegetated rivers deposit sediment downstream, which means the rivers bend less and have greater variability in bend width.
The question remained whether plants were the primary cause of these differences or whether other factors were at play. To resolve this, the researchers investigated 3 additional factors. The first was the natural fluctuations in water flow across a river system, called its flow variability. They found that during storms, flow variability caused river bends to move downstream in unvegetated rivers, but not in vegetated rivers. This result suggested that flow variability alone didn’t drive downstream migration, although it can directly impact vegetation.
The second variable the researchers analyzed was the amount of sediment a river can carry, or its sediment flux. They found that rivers carrying more sediment can erode more banks, also shifting river bends. However, rivers with more sediment but the same level of plant coverage had statistically similar bend angles. Thus, the researchers concluded that sediment flux alone can’t drive bend development, and that the changes were instead dependent on vegetation cover.
The third variable they analyzed was riverbank strength. The researchers observed rivers with strong banks, made of rock or compacted sediment, and weak banks, made of loose sediment. They observed no difference in river bends with the same vegetation cover but different bank strengths. The researchers concluded that bank strength is also not the primary driver of bend migration in vegetated or unvegetated rivers.
Of the 4 variables the researchers examined – flow variability, sediment flux, bank strength, and vegetation cover – vegetation cover consistently had the greatest impact on the appearance of meandering rivers. They concluded that meandering rivers could have existed before plants, but would have looked different. Like modern unvegetated rivers, ancient meandering rivers likely had lower-angle bends. As plants evolved and grew on river banks, the bends would have developed differently, becoming curvier like modern vegetated rivers. They suggested that understanding this process provides insight into life on Earth before plants evolved 450 million years ago.
The post How did land plants change rivers? appeared first on Sciworthy.
Login