It takes a lot to get your typical white-bread American riled up enough that they’re willing to go to jail. Getting arrested is a massive pain, bringing court dates, fines, and a record that can shadow your job and housing prospects for the rest of your life.

For most folks, just the threat of jail time is enough to keep them on their best behavior. Yet in 2026, data centers have become one of the rare issues pushing more and more of Americans to risk it anyway.

So far in the US, Futurism has counted at least 37 arrests stemming from protests related to data centers this year. There were an additional 12 cases where police intervened to prevent protestors or speakers from confronting civic leaders, though in reality that number is likely much higher, as these cases aren’t as likely to make the news.

Unlike in other moments of political unrest in recent memory, it’s hard to pigeonhole these anti-data center activists demographically. They range from landowning farmers to physics teachers, zoomers to boomers, rural townspeople to suburban parents.

Despite their differences, the arrestees all have one thing in common: they each felt the actions of democratically elected officials are failing to reflect the wishes of their constituents, instead deferring to massive tech corporations.

Take the case of 42-year old Pablo Payan, a maintenance manager from Indiana. During a public meeting in May held to discuss plans to erect a massive Amazon data center in the city of Hobart, Payan refused to identify himself for the record before speaking, resulting in an attempted removal by police.

As officers were escorting him out, Payan says he asked why he was being removed, which prompted officers to place him under arrest for criminal trespass and disorderly conduct.

“In my opinion, I was kicked out to prove a point that the law is on their side and if people continue to try and express themselves and speak, they will also be intimidated or arrested by law enforcement,” Payan told Fox32 after the fact. “So I think it was a flex of power.”

Far from the “anti-tech extremism” that law enforcement agencies and the Trump administration have warned about, these demonstrations are overwhelmingly peaceful, escalating into physical confrontations only when police lay hands on a person to remove them. Many of the charges come when anti-data center activists break petty clerical rules, like going slightly over the allotted time for a public comment.

Lux Claridge, a physics teacher from Emporia, Kansas, is an exemplar of the absurd ways civic leaders can weaponize police to stifle dissent. At a public meeting earlier this month, Claridge was arrested after clapping in support of another community member speaking out against a proposed 1,000 acre data center campus — running afoul of a commissioner’s rule against “snapping” and “clapping.”

“I am fully of the notion that clapping is a First Amendment right that I have,” Claridge said in an interview with 404 Media after the fact. “I can exercise that as long as I’m not disrupting, and I still argue that I was not disrupting at all.”

“I have a right to clap,” Claridge continued, “and if you want me out, you’re going to have to drag me out.”

More on protests: Furious Protestor Tears AI-Generated Art Off Wall of Exhibit, Chews It Up Into Tiny Shreds Using His Teeth

The post The Number of Regular People Being Arrested for Protesting Data Centers Is Astounding appeared first on Futurism.

O retorno da mídia física e da tecnologia analógica trouxe uma grande dúvida para quem deseja entrar no mundo dos LPs: a famosa "vitrola" de maleta é uma boa opção ou pode estragar o disco de vinil? Essa discussão ganha ainda mais espaço porque muitas pessoas já adquiriram equipamentos de áudio desse tipo.

Esses toca-discos geralmente são vendidos em diferentes cores e formatos, quase sempre com design retrô, e dominaram as redes sociais nos últimos anos. Boa parte desse sucesso se deve aos preços atrativos, que normalmente variam entre R$ 500 e R$ 600.

• 📱 Veja as melhores promoções de hoje no WhatsApp do CT Ofertas

Ou seja, muitas pessoas enxergam nesses dispositivos uma porta de entrada acessível para começar a ouvir discos de vinil sem gastar muito. Mas, por trás do charme vintage, existe uma mecânica mais modesta que levanta debates técnicos sobre esse tipo de equipamento.

O problema está na mecânica dos equipamentos

Quando analisamos os toca-discos instalados nessas maletas, a principal questão gira em torno da qualidade das peças que compõem o sistema de reprodução. Esses equipamentos costumam vir equipados com alto-falantes embutidos de pouca definição, além de cápsulas de cerâmica e agulhas de baixa qualidade.

Outro ponto é que a estrutura do braço não possui um contrapeso ajustável na base, o que impede o controle preciso da força aplicada pela agulha sobre o disco. João Augusto, consultor da Polysom, a maior fábrica de discos de vinil da América Latina, explica que a principal limitação dessas "vitrolas" está justamente na simplicidade do conjunto mecânico.

"Esses toca-discos não estragam o vinil, mas não conseguem reproduzi-lo da forma ideal por faltar a robustez necessária. Eles foram desenvolvidos originalmente para tocar compactos de 7 polegadas, que são mais leves e exigem menos do motor. Com os LPs, a história é outra, porque são mais pesados e precisam de um motor mais potente para manter a rotação saudável", destaca o especialista.

Por que discos novos "pulam" na maleta?

Uma das maiores frustrações de quem compra uma vitrola portátil é colocar um disco novo, especialmente modelos de 180 gramas, e perceber que a agulha começa a "pular" durante a reprodução das músicas. A primeira reação do usuário pode ser achar que o disco veio com defeito, mas o problema costuma estar no próprio aparelho.

João explica que isso acontece porque o conjunto mecânico desses toca-discos é bastante simples e não foi projetado para reproduzir LPs mais pesados.

Em comparação com toca-discos mais robustos, os modelos instalados nas maletas costumam ter um braço mais curto, não contam com contrapeso ajustável nem com recursos como o anti-skating, sistema que ajuda a manter a agulha corretamente posicionada no sulco do disco durante a reprodução.

Na prática, todas essas limitações dificultam uma leitura estável do sulco e favorecem pulos e distorções, principalmente nas últimas músicas de cada lado do disco, quando a agulha já está mais próxima do centro do LP.

Agulha desgastada e "gambiarra da moeda": os verdadeiros riscos

João Augusto afirma que um disco de vinil não será arruinado por ser reproduzido em uma vitrola de maleta. Ainda assim, o especialista destaca que existem riscos associados a algumas práticas dos usuários.

Uma delas é continuar utilizando o toca-discos quando a agulha já está desgastada ou esgarçada. Outro alerta é em relação à famosa "gambiarra da moeda", em que muitos usuários colocam uma moeda sobre a cápsula para aumentar o peso do braço e evitar que o disco pule.

Essa adição de peso para compensar a fragilidade do equipamento é justamente o que pode maltratar e desgastar o PVC do disco.

Diante disso, o consultor da Polysom afirma que a recomendação para quem pretende investir no hobby e aproveitar todo o potencial da mídia física é priorizar aparelhos mais robustos, e não escolher um modelo apenas pela aparência.

“A orientação é optar por toca-discos mais completos. Não só pela saúde do disco, que sobreviverá, mas pela qualidade do que o usuário vai ouvir com um equipamento mais avançado”, destaca João. 

Na prática, a avaliação do especialista mostra que, antes de comprometer a coleção de LPs, as vitrolas de maleta costumam limitar justamente aquilo que tornou o vinil tão popular novamente: o prazer de ouvir música com clareza, riqueza de detalhes e sem distorções.

E, se você já faz parte do time de colecionadores de discos, vale conhecer estes 9 apps para catalogar vinis e organizar sua coleção de LPs.

{{WHATSAPP_CHANNEL}}

Since the launch of Flock Safety in 2017, the ACLU estimates the company installed some 100,000 automatic license plate readers throughout the United States. The dragnet comes with plenty of downsides to privacy and civil liberties: it’s ripe for abuse by crooked cops, powered by sweatshop labor, and nearly impossible to escape once it designates you a target.

But police officials insist it’s worth the trade off — because at it least it helps them catch the bad guys, right? Unfortunately, the reality isn’t quite that peachy.

Atlanta, Georgia has experienced far and away the largest influx of ALRPs in the country, with over 5,000 various Flock cameras now blanketing the city. Yet as bombshell data released by the FBI shows, the city’s massive web of surveillance has had virtually zero impact on the Atlanta Police Department’s ability to solve crime, with some clearance rates for offenses like homicide even experiencing a decline over the past few years as the cameras have proliferated.

First reported by the Atlanta Community Press Collective, the FBI data is a damning refutation of Flock’s primary claim: that ALPRs are necessary to help officers keep the public safe.

According to the ACPC, the rates at which the APD resolves crimes like homicide, robbery, miscellaneous larceny, and shoplifting have actually decreased between 2021 and 2025, when the city’s ALPR build-out hit its full stride.

For homicide, the numbers are especially embarrassing, with the FBI reporting case closures at just 48 percent in 2025, down from 53.4 percent in 2021. Meanwhile, rape remained flat year over year, holding steady at a pitiful 37.7 percent closure rate from 2021 to 2025, and dipping down to just 21.2 percent at its lowest point in that four-year span.

Though the APD actually did show improvement on some crime categories as Flock’s cameras sprouted all over the city, the changes from 2021 to 2025 amount to little more than rounding errors.

For example, case closures on crimes like aggravated assault and motor vehicle theft ticked up by just 0.2 and 0.3 percent, respectively. One would think motor vehicle theft solve rates would be an easy win for a technology designed to track cars, specifically. Yet in 2025, the APD was solving just one in tencases of auto theft, even with thousands of Flock ALPRs at its disposal.

Len Phillips, head of the anti-ALPR community group DeFlock Atlanta told ACPC that the “public has been asked to accept a significant expansion of surveillance based on the promise that it would dramatically improve public safety.”

In reality, Phillips continues, that tradeoff between safety and civil liberties “was just a one-way transaction.”

More on Flock: In Light of Overwhelming Backlash, Flock Cancels Creepy Audio Surveillance Feature

The post Flock Surveillance Cameras Are Actually Horrible for Fighting Crime, FBI Data Shows appeared first on Futurism.

The US job market is in a weird place right now.

Life is clearly rough for the working class, stuck navigating Kafkaeqsue hiring infrastructure while billionaires devour an ever-larger slice of the world’s wealth. But frustratingly, the data being used to steer the economy tells a rosier story than the one workers actually live. The latest unemployment numbers — a flawed metric, admittedly — showed a slight improvement from May to June, at least on paper. And even as the economy appears to cool its jets, Americans keep spending like there’s no tomorrow, even in the face of aggressive inflation.

With so much data — anecdotal and empirical — swirling around, it’s hard to find the pulse of the US labor force. Luckily, one enterprising AI startup found a perfect barometer. There’s no conflicting data or tedious calculations involved — just a little ink, and the vibrating sting of a tattoo machine.

On Thursday, the Y Combinator-backed AI startup LemonLime hosted a bizarre recruitment event in which attendees were offered an “instant interview” in exchange for getting the company’s logo tattooed on their body.

It sounds like a joke, but LemonLime co-founder Jordan Zietz bragged on a LinkedIn post that an astonishing seven people took them up on the offer.

According to his post, the goal was to “meet exceptional people,” and sort out “which of them are just as crazy as we are.”

“That’s why we brought an actual tattoo artist to our party and offered an instant interview to anyone who got a LemonLime tattoo,” Zietz continued. “If you’re reaching out to us to apply for a job, you might want to take notes.”

While coercive body art has become increasingly common in the 21st century, there’s usually at least some form of financial compensation involved. The idea that it takes getting a permanent tattoo just to get one foot in the door for an interview is especially galling, and reveals a lot about the sorry state of the US job market.

One of the people who received a free tattoo, Dimple Amitha Garuadapuri, clarified on LinkedIn that while she didn’t get the company’s logo inked on her skin, “almost everyone else got a LemonLime tattoo.”

Regardless, news of the stunt spread quickly on social media, prompting a lightning-fast apology from the founder, who admitted on X-formerly-Twitter that he “messed up.”

“Even though participants chose their own tattoos and no one was asked to get our logo, I should have understood the pressure and power dynamic created by connecting tattoos to hiring,” Zietz said. “We’ve taken the posts down and have spoken to everyone who participated. We’re also ready to cover associated removal costs with anyone facing any delayed regret.”

Just for good measure, the founder stressed that “interviews were available to everyone regardless,” though it remains to be seen if the seven share that view.

Did you attend the YC afterparty with LemonLime? If so, we’d love to hear from you. Reach out at tips@futurism.com. We can keep you anonymous.

More on tech startups: Startup Sued After Delivery Bot Clobbers 73-Year Old Woman

The post We Are Mildly Horrified by This AI Startup That Coerced People Into Getting Tattoos of Its Logo in Exchange for a Job Interview appeared first on Futurism.

For a time, it appeared as if AI would find broad acceptance among the American masses.

The peanut gallery on social media happily embraced early image generation models as researchers appeared to make significant breakthroughs with the aid of their newfound tools. On paper, surveys found public attitudes toward the tech continued to improve into 2025 — before sharply reversing.

In 2026, America’s honeymoon phase with AI seems to be quickly wearing off. According to a joint poll conducted by Bentley University and Gallup, the percentage of US adults who think AI does “more harm than good” is rising, from 31 percent in 2025 to 39 percent this year, while a piddling 9 percent still think the tech does “more good than harm.”

As outlooks sour, the Bentley-Gallup poll found that Americans’ familiarity with AI continues to grow. In 2026, 70 percent of those polled said they’re “somewhat or extremely knowledgeable” about AI, up 6 percent compared to 2024. The implication probably gives OpenAI Sam Altman a migraine: the more people learn about AI, the less they seem to want it in their lives.

Meanwhile, Americans are increasingly wary about data centers, with a recent Politico survey finding that 41 percent of US adults would oppose a data center being built within three miles of their home, up drastically from 28 percent in January. At the same time, the volume of support for data centers plummeted, down 13 percent over the past six months alone.

Speaking to Bloomberg about the rising aversion to AI, professor of ethics at Carnegie Mellon University’s Tepper School of Business Derek Leben said the attitude is increasingly taking root along social lines. Not only do AI haters dislike the tech in their own personal sphere, but they’re increasingly scrutinizing their friends, family, and coworkers about their attitudes.

“The most obvious social effect is suspicion,” Leben told Bloomberg. “There is also a moral and political judgment that is coming along with AI usage, especially in creative industries where the stigma is the strongest.”

Carla Milan, a 37-year-old public health professional in New York City, told the publication she’s frustrated that family and friends deploy AI reflexively, without considering its social or environmental costs.

“I hear people champion AI and I’m like, ‘sure, why don’t we all participate in our collective downfall?'” Milan told Bloomberg. “Why don’t we all play a part in diminishing our humanity and degrading the environment?”

More on AI: Meta Working on Crushingly Sad AI App That Tells Bedtime Stories to Children, for “Tired” Parents

The post The More People Learn About AI, the More They Want It Out of Their Lives appeared first on Futurism.

As unpopular as SpaceX and Tesla CEO Elon Musk has become in the popular eye, some say the vitriol doesn’t go nearly far enough.

In an episode of his podcast Ones and Tooze, Columbia University economic historian Adam Tooze picked apart the increasingly expensive AI arms race and its consequences for humanity. Among Tooze’s observations: the AI boom is completely upending the long-standing social contract under capitalism, a shift embodied most dramatically by Musk.

During the podcast, co-host Cameron Abadi asked what a “best case scenario” for AI might look like — where a human-level superintelligence emerges that can automate the world’s jobs. In response, Tooze pointed to a report from the Bank of International Settlements: under that scenario, labor’s share of income could collapse from an already paltry 54 percent to just 20 percent, meaning workers would be forced to fight over the remaining crumbs that drop from billionaires’ tables.

“The share in the total pie collapses, and that’s obviously a huge transformation in political power,” Tooze explained. And though that’s a future projection, the economic historian notes we’re already seeing symptoms of this extreme reversal of fortunes today, chiefly in the extreme wealth accumulation of Musk.

“I don’t understand frankly why the event of Musk’s enrichment isn’t more of a scandal, isn’t more a historic moment,” Tooze said. “Like this — to have a trillionaire in our midst ruptures the social bargain in such a — just such a dramatic way, like how can we even be any longer talking about being in the same society as this group of individuals who’ve unleashed this technology on the world.”

“It goes beyond Luddism,” Tooze continued, referring to the 19th-century labor movement that saw workers smash textile looms to fight back against economic exploitation. “It’s not about resisting the technology per se, it’s about asking ‘which social contract this belongs to?'”

Though it remains to be seen how severe an impact AI actually has on the labor market, one scenario keeps surfacing: superintelligent AI fuels a drastic rise in economic inequality, with tech billionaires on one end, and the working class on the other.

Comparing the current “AI arms race” to the actual nuclear arms race, Tooze asks the listener to imagine a “private Manhattan Project, developing a thermonuclear weapon,” calling superintelligent AI “kind of like a labor-market neutron bomb.”

And where the Manhattan Project was funded, organized, and staffed by the US government, the current AI boom takes almost the exact opposite approach, following the whims of the ultra-rich.

“Clearly, government money has gone into Silicon Valley in various ways,” Tooze caveats. “But nevertheless, the contrast between the Manhattan Project… and the realities of the current moment, spearheaded by a figure like Elon Musk, who literally has eviscerated the state apparatus of that first [nuclear] race… it strikes me that it’s really a regression away from the mid-century arms race model to something that’s much more like the ‘Merchants of Death’ vision.” (The Merchants of Death was a moniker for 1930s-era war profiteers.)

“We’re back in that space” Tooze continues, “of private, unfettered, oligarchic — but global — arms race… to my mind, the [AI arms race] analogy is interesting not because of the similarities, but because of the differences it reveals.”

More on Musk: Suddenly, as His Empire Crumbles, Elon Musk Admits He Made a Huge Mistake With DOGE

The post Columbia Economist Baffled as to Why the Masses Aren’t Rising Up Against Elon Musk appeared first on Futurism.