Multiferroics are materials that simultaneously exhibit two or more ferroic orders—stable arrangements of physical properties that can be switched using an external stimulus. These materials could be highly advantageous for the development of various technologies, including non-volatile, low-power memory devices, spintronic devices, miniaturized electronics, neuromorphic hardware, sensors and magnetoelectric devices.

When a material heats up, its electrical resistance often rises. The harder question is what, exactly, is getting in the way. The electrons carrying the current may be scattered by vibrations of the material's atomic lattice, known as phonons. They may also collide with one another. Frustratingly, a conventional temperature test warms the electrons and the lattice together, so the effects arrive tangled in the same resistance measurement.

When a material heats up, its electrical resistance often rises. The harder question is what, exactly, is getting in the way. The electrons carrying the current may be scattered by vibrations of the material's atomic lattice, known as phonons. They may also collide with one another. Frustratingly, a conventional temperature test warms the electrons and the lattice together, so the effects arrive tangled in the same resistance measurement.

Soft materials such as colloidal suspensions, emulsions, foams and gels often display complex and unusual behaviors compared with ordinary solids or liquids. From a mechanical point of view, for instance, they can resist deformation like solids, but they can also start to flow like liquids when a sufficiently strong external drive is applied. This transition from solid-like to liquid-like behavior, known as "yielding," is central to the physics of soft amorphous materials and to many industrial and biological processes.

Soft materials such as colloidal suspensions, emulsions, foams and gels often display complex and unusual behaviors compared with ordinary solids or liquids. From a mechanical point of view, for instance, they can resist deformation like solids, but they can also start to flow like liquids when a sufficiently strong external drive is applied. This transition from solid-like to liquid-like behavior, known as "yielding," is central to the physics of soft amorphous materials and to many industrial and biological processes.

Beneath every step we take, soils hold one of the planet’s largest reservoirs of carbon, a vast, slow-moving bank of organic matter that quietly regulates how much of the world’s carbon stays locked away and how much escapes into the atmosphere as greenhouse gas. Now a sweeping new review warns that climate-driven extremes, droughts, floods, and wildfires, are rewriting the rules of that subterranean economy in ways that conventional models and land-management practices have not yet caught up with. The analysis, led by environmental scientist Nanthi Bolan of the University of Western Australia and colleagues, including a corresponding authorship by Bolan himself, synthesizes a substantial body of global evidence on how extreme weather reshapes carbon inputs to soil, microbial processing, erosion, and the sequestration of carbon that underpins soil health, water retention, nutrient cycling, and agricultural productivity.

The work, published in the journal Carbon Research, is notable for the scale of its underlying evidence base. On 14 January 2026, the authors searched Google Scholar, PubMed, and Web of Science using terms spanning climate change, extreme weather, soil carbon, microbial activity, decomposition, erosion, dissolved organic matter, and leaching. The initial sweep returned 14,218 records; after removing duplicates and screening for eligibility, 3,754 articles remained for bibliometric and qualitative analysis. From those, 187 publications were selected for detailed synthesis based on relevance, methodological rigor, and the substantive quality of their findings. Keyword co-occurrence patterns were mapped with VOSviewer, a bibliometric tool that reveals the intellectual architecture of a research field. The result is a critical review grounded in structured literature screening rather than new experimental data, but its synthesis offers one of the most comprehensive maps yet of how extremes rearrange the soil carbon cycle.

The review’s central finding is that no two extremes act alike. Drought, the most widespread disturbance, operates largely through the plant side of the equation. When rainfall fails, photosynthesis slows, plant biomass production falls, and the total flux of carbon entering soils through roots, residues, and litter declines. There is a nuance here: under moderate water stress, plants may temporarily shift a greater proportion of their fixed carbon belowground, investing in roots to chase moisture. But prolonged drought overwhelms that compensatory response. Microbial biomass shrinks, litter decomposition stalls, and the living engine of the soil carbon cycle idles. Then comes the deceptive twist: when rain finally returns, rewetting triggers a rapid pulse of carbon dioxide as starved soil microbes seize upon the accumulated substrates left behind by months of suspended activity. That post-drought CO₂ flush, the review emphasizes, can erase much of the apparent “savings” that accumulated during the dry period. Across the assembled evidence, repeated and multi-year drought was consistently associated with declining soil organic carbon, with grasslands and arable croplands showing particularly pronounced losses, ecosystems that happen to anchor much of the world’s food production.

Flooding tells the opposite story, but it ends in many of the same places. Water saturation chokes off oxygen diffusion through soil pores, forcing microbial metabolism into anaerobic pathways. That shift changes everything downstream. Prolonged waterlogging can drive the chemical reduction of iron oxyhydroxides, minerals that in oxygenated conditions act as microscopic glues binding organic carbon to soil particles. When those minerals dissolve, the carbon they held is released as dissolved organic carbon, which can then be stripped away by erosion and leaching and exported to rivers, lakes, and ultimately the ocean. The review stresses, however, that flooding is not unambiguously a carbon loss story. Wetlands and other periodically inundated ecosystems can accumulate and retain enormous carbon stocks precisely because water constrains decomposition. Whether a flood event releases carbon or banks it depends on the interplay between plant inputs, oxygen availability, and hydrological transport, a delicate balance that shifting rainfall regimes are actively destabilizing.

Wildfire is the most dramatic and immediately visible of the three forces, and its effects cascade on multiple timescales. Combustion directly strips vegetation, litter, and soil organic matter, transferring carbon to the atmosphere in hours. But fire also rearranges the physical and biological landscape of the soil in subtler ways: it can increase erosion by removing protective ground cover, alter soil wettability in ways that change hydrological behavior, restructure microbial communities, and expose previously protected carbon, once shielded inside aggregates or mineral associations, to fresh decomposition. There is a paradoxical bright spot. Pyrogenic carbon, the charcoal-like residue of incomplete combustion, is chemically recalcitrant and can persist in soils for centuries or millennia, functioning as a long-term carbon sink. Whether a fire leaves a landscape as a net carbon source or stabilizes some of its carbon in pyrogenic form depends on fire severity, soil moisture, fuel load, ecosystem type, and the trajectory of post-fire recovery. The review is clear that this balance cannot be predicted from fire alone; it is contingent, site by site, on conditions that vary widely across the globe.

Perhaps the most consequential theme running through the synthesis is that carbon responses cannot be inferred from the type of extreme event alone. Land use, soil mineralogy, hydrology, salinity, vegetation composition, microbial community makeup, and the timing of events within a season all determine whether carbon ends up stored, mobilized, or released. Iron and aluminum oxyhydroxides and clay minerals, for instance, provide mineral protection that can shield organic matter even under stress, while sandy or low-clay soils offer little such refuge. Managed croplands respond differently from native grasslands; saline coastal soils behave differently from acidic forest soils. And compound events, drought followed by wildfire, or alternating drought and flooding in rapid succession, may produce effects that are qualitatively different from those of isolated disturbances, as when a dried landscape burns more intensely, or when post-fire soils, stripped of vegetation, wash away in the first heavy rain. The review argues that the climate science and soil science communities have largely studied these disturbances one at a time, while the real world increasingly delivers them in combination.

The implications for climate mitigation and adaptation are substantial. Soil organic carbon is frequently invoked in national climate pledges and voluntary carbon markets as a bankable sink, yet the review suggests that the security of that bank depends heavily on how often and how severely extremes strike. If multi-year droughts steadily drain carbon from grasslands and croplands, or if fires repeatedly reset accumulation cycles, the effective permanence of soil carbon storage becomes far more fragile than many accounting frameworks assume. Conversely, protecting and rebuilding soil carbon delivers benefits well beyond climate: it improves water retention in drought-prone regions, supports nutrient cycling, stabilizes soil structure against erosion, and sustains the microbial diversity on which fertility depends. Carbon stewardship, in other words, is not separable from food security or ecosystem resilience; it is the same problem viewed from different angles.

The authors are candid about the limits of the current evidence base. The article does not report newly generated datasets and does not present a dedicated limitations section, and its conclusions rest on a qualitative synthesis of selected publications. Consequently, they call for improved and more consistent evidence across soil types, land uses, and both terrestrial and aquatic environments, and across multiple temporal scales, from the instantaneous CO₂ pulse after rewetting to the multi-decadal trajectory of carbon storage. Standardizing measurements of carbon pools, microbial functions, and event intensity, they argue, would make results comparable across ecosystems and enable more confident generalization, something the field currently struggles to achieve given heterogeneous methods and site-specific reporting.

Looking forward, the review sketches a research agenda that is as technologically ambitious as it is mechanistically focused. The authors recommend integrating high-resolution remote sensing with ground observations, advanced spectroscopy, molecular analyses, and integrated modeling to track carbon as it moves through soils and into waterways. They single out several priorities: characterizing microbial genomic and functional diversity as it responds to stress, quantifying carbon stoichiometry, probing the interactions between organic matter and iron and aluminum oxyhydroxides, understanding clay-mineral protection mechanisms, tracking long-term storage outcomes, and systematically studying the sequencing of compound extreme events. Each of these threads addresses a gap in the mechanistic chain that links a weather event in the atmosphere to a molecule of carbon, stabilized or released, in the soil.

What emerges from the review is a picture of the soil carbon cycle not as a stable background process but as a dynamic, contested system whose behavior under climate extremes is far less predictable than once assumed. The same storm that floods a rice paddy and exports carbon to a river delta may, a few hundred kilometers away, end a drought and briefly green a grassland, with opposite consequences for the atmosphere. As extremes grow more frequent and more compound, the review makes the case that understanding, and safeguarding, the carbon held beneath our feet will require science that is as interconnected and as restless as the weather itself.

Keywords

soil organic carbon, extreme weather, drought, flooding, wildfire, carbon sequestration, microbial activity, dissolved organic carbon, erosion, pyrogenic carbon, climate change, soil health

Could radioactive atoms in a Bose–Einstein condensate (BEC) form a “superradiant neutrino laser”? According to a paper published last year by Benjamin Jones of the University of Manchester and  Joseph Formaggio of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology the answer is “yes”. We were intrigued by this proposal and commissioned the freelance physics writer Tim Wogan to write an article for us.

As part of his reporting, Wogan sought the opinion of a BEC expert – James Thompson of NIST, JILA and the University of Colorado in Boulder. Thompson told us that he was sceptical of the viability of such a device – in particular, he pointed out that the de Broglie wavelength of the emitted neutrinos is much too short for superradiance to occur.

Now, another physicist (Wolfgang Ketterle, who shared a Nobel prize for his pioneering work on BECs) has published two papers that cast doubt on Jones and Formaggio’s proposal. All three papers are published in a very prestigious journal, so this is a scientific debate of note.

So what is superradiance, and how could it be used to create a source of coherent neutrinos?

Coherent burst

Superradiance was originally envisioned in an ensemble of excited atoms, each of which can decay by emitting a photon. Normally, the rate at which photons are emitted from such an ensemble is simply proportional to the number of atoms present. Double the number of atoms, and the rate of emission will double. However, if the ensemble is dense enough that the wavelength of the emitted photons is much longer than the separation between neighbouring atoms, the emission of a single photon will involve all of the atoms. What is more, the superradiant emission rate is proportional to square of the number of atoms. The result is short, intense burst of coherent radiation. It is this coherence that has caused some to refer to superradiant lasers – although the physics of lasers is different.

Jones and Formaggio’s proposal involves radioactive atoms that decay with the emission of a neutrino, rather than a photon. Their idea is to cool an ensemble of these atoms to near absolute zero so that it forms a BEC. This is a unique form of matter that can be described as a macroscopic quantum state. Under this condition, the duo argued that neutrinos would be emitted rapidly from a superradiant state.

Now, Ketterle, Yu-Kun Lu and Hanzhen Lin at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology argue in two papers that such a superradiant neutrino laser is an impossibility. As well as backing up Thompson’s concerns about the short wavelength of the neutrinos, they point out that the atoms produced by the neutrino decays are fermions, and this precludes superradiance. They also showed that the recoil of atoms after neutrino emission would not allow the coherent emission of neutrinos to occur.

I think this is a fascinating subject and I hope that Jones and Formaggio can revive their proposal, because a BEC-based neutrino laser would be very cool!

You can read more about the debate in an article in Physics by Thompson and colleagues.

 

 

The post Doubts cast on ‘superradiant neutrino laser’ proposal appeared first on Physics World.

Nickel disulfide, NiS₂, is an unusual material. Its interior behaves as an electrical insulator, blocking the flow of current, while certain parts of its surface conduct electricity freely. This contradiction has puzzled physicists for decades, and a recent study offers a detailed explanation. The conduction, it turns out, is confined to tiny one-dimensional steps on the surface, and these narrow conducting channels are a direct consequence of how electrons are arranged inside the crystal.

Mott insulator

NiS₂ shares its crystal structure with pyrite, the mineral sometimes called fool’s gold. At ordinary conditions, its electrons do not move freely through the lattice: the strong electrical repulsion between them opens an energy gap that keeps the bulk of the material insulating. This behaviour defines what physicists call a Mott, or charge-transfer, insulator, a category of materials that simple band theory cannot explain. Band theory predicts that any material with a partially filled outer electron shell should conduct electricity, yet compounds like nickel oxide obstinately insulate instead. In 1949, the physicist Nevill Mott showed why: if two electrons crowding the same atomic site cost more energy than is available, the electrons stay locked in place and no current flows, regardless of what band theory predicts. NiS₂ behaves in much the same way.

Yet electrical-transport measurements had repeatedly found that crystals of NiS₂ conduct through their surfaces. Earlier scanning-tunnelling experiments helped explain part of the puzzle: the broad, flat surface remains insulating, but the electronic gap narrows sharply near atomic-scale steps, tiny cliffs just one or two atoms high where the surface abruptly changes level. A new study ¹ confirms this picture and examines the steps with much higher spatial resolution than before.

A not that smooth surface

A scanning tunnelling microscope (STM) works by bringing an extremely sharp needle close enough to a surface that electrons can leak across the gap between tip and sample. Measuring that leakage at different energies reveals both the surface’s shape and how easily electrons can enter or leave it. In NiS₂, these measurements uncovered electronic states concentrated tightly along the step edges: the states extend for a long distance parallel to a step but stay confined to roughly one to two nanometres across it. In other words, the electrons are effectively free to move in one direction while remaining trapped in the other two, forming genuine one-dimensional conduction channels.

Two distinct kinds of surface step were observed, depending on whether the outermost atomic layer exposes nickel or sulfur atoms. Both carry electronic states associated with their steps, but they are not equally important. The nickel-terminated steps host states that sit right at the energy where electrical conduction happens, making them the most likely explanation for the surface conductivity that transport experiments had measured for years. The sulfur-terminated steps also host states inside the insulating gap, but their energy is positioned further away, making them less directly responsible for carrying current.

The study also tested what happens when a magnetic field is applied perpendicular to the surface. The step-edge states survived fields as strong as 10 tesla, a field far stronger than any produced by a laboratory magnet used for everyday purposes. Their intensity weakened somewhat, particularly on the sulfur-terminated steps, but the states were never destroyed. This robustness matters because NiS₂ already displays complicated magnetic behaviour of its own, which might easily have disrupted a more fragile conducting state.

The deeper explanation lies in how electrons are distributed inside the crystal. In an ordinary insulator, the occupied electronic states can usually be pictured as clouds centred on the atoms themselves. NiS₂ is different: calculations show that part of its electron density is naturally centred at special positions between atoms, specifically near the midpoints of pairs of sulfur atoms, where no atom actually sits. Physicists call these obstructed charge centres, and materials built around them belong to a class known as obstructed atomic insulators, a concept that grew out of a broader effort over the past decade to classify materials by the geometry, and not just the energy, of their electron states.

Not ordinary metallic defects

This arrangement is not a chemical accident; it is protected by the symmetry of the crystal. When the crystal is cut to form a surface, though, the special positions that hosted this electron density can no longer fit together the way they did in the bulk. At a step edge, this mismatch creates what is known as a filling anomaly: an imbalance in how the available electronic states can be occupied, which leaves behind a state inside the insulating gap, localized right at the edge. Calculations of artificial step structures reproduce the main features seen under the microscope, including this localization, supporting the idea that the conducting channels are not ordinary metallic defects caused by broken chemical bonds, but a direct consequence of the crystal’s underlying electronic geometry.

The study also settles a long-standing question about NiS₂’s magnetism at low temperature. Below about 39 kelvin, the nickel magnetic moments arrange themselves into a non-collinear antiferromagnetic pattern, with neighbouring moments pointing in different directions that largely cancel out. Below about 30 kelvin, they rearrange again into a state that produces a small but measurable net magnetization. New neutron-diffraction measurements support a revised model of this low-temperature arrangement, resolving a debate about the material’s magnetic ground state that had lasted for roughly fifty years.

Taken together, the results give NiS₂ a significance well beyond its peculiar conducting surface. The material shows that strong repulsion between electrons, magnetism, and the geometry of electronic states can coexist within a single crystal. Such geometric protection is normally associated with topological materials, in which certain electronic states are shielded from disorder or defects by the crystal’s symmetry. The new results suggest that this protection can survive even when strong interactions push a material into being an insulator, making NiS₂ a rare setting for studying how the quantum-mechanical arrangement of electrons decides where electricity is allowed to flow within an otherwise insulating crystal.

Author: César Tomé López is a science writer and the editor of Mapping Ignorance

Disclaimer: Parts of this article may have been copied verbatim or almost verbatim from the referenced research paper/s.

The post Why an insulator can conduct electricity along its edges appeared first on Mapping Ignorance.

Topological quantum materials combine unusual electronic states with properties such as magnetism or superconductivity, offering possibilities for future electronics and quantum technologies. Researchers at Tohoku University have now shown that changing the number of layers in a crystal can provide a systematic way to design topological magnets. The work is published in the Journal of the American Chemical Society.

Topological quantum materials combine unusual electronic states with properties such as magnetism or superconductivity, offering possibilities for future electronics and quantum technologies. Researchers at Tohoku University have now shown that changing the number of layers in a crystal can provide a systematic way to design topological magnets. The work is published in the Journal of the American Chemical Society.

Material properties such as sound insulation, resistance to extreme heat and thermal expansion originate from how the zillions of microscopic building blocks (nuclei and electrons) interact at equilibrium and respond to perturbations. Atoms are typically about one ten-billionth of a meter across, so there can be a lot of parts to keep track of—a task that is complicated at the quantum-mechanical level, where particles are neither here nor there until observed.

Material properties such as sound insulation, resistance to extreme heat and thermal expansion originate from how the zillions of microscopic building blocks (nuclei and electrons) interact at equilibrium and respond to perturbations. Atoms are typically about one ten-billionth of a meter across, so there can be a lot of parts to keep track of—a task that is complicated at the quantum-mechanical level, where particles are neither here nor there until observed.

Physicists around the world remain deeply divided on key mysteries of the universe, from dark matter to quantum gravity. The standard cosmological model failed to gain majority support, and no leading theory dominated the survey results. The largest survey ever conducted among physicists worldwide reveals surprisingly little agreement on some of the field’s biggest mysteries, [...]

In a promising advancement in the search for dark matter, scientists have transformed a tiny magnet into a detector that can sense some of nature’s faintest forces—with a little help from levitation.

The research could help researchers detect some of the heaviest particles that are believed to have ever inhabited the universe, according to physicists.

Led by Rice University physicist Christopher Tunnell, the achievement was made using a tiny permanent magnet—one around the size of a grain of sand—which they levitated over a superconductor that was chilled to freezing cold temperatures just above absolute zero.

Since the magnet floats without encountering any surfaces, this dramatically reduces friction, allowing the Rice team to carefully monitor its movements, some of which are as small as around one-hundredth of a single atom. Such subtleties of its motion offer a novel possibility: that the magnet’s faint movements could serve as an effective signal if a massive dark matter particle passed through the detector.

Unusual Candidates for Dark Matter Particles

“Dark matter could be hiding at masses that our traditional experiments were never built to reach,” Tunnell said in a recent statement, noting that by leveraging the team’s novel detector, “we can begin searching a part of the dark matter landscape that has largely been out of experimental reach despite being the focus of extensive theoretical study by my Rice cosmology colleague Andrew Long.”

Among the most mysterious phenomena in the universe, dark matter is believed to comprise most of the matter that populates the cosmos and exerts gravitational effects that influence the formation and behavior of galaxies. Despite this, scientists have remained unsuccessful in detecting it or even determining what it is comprised of.

There are several experiments that hunt for hypothetical dark matter particles, which scientists believe have masses that are similar to those of atoms or subatomic particles. Still, there are some theoretical models which suggest much heavier particles could also qualify—some approaching sizes as large as a human cell.

A Novel Means of Detecting Dark Matter

Detecting something so large would require a very different kind of dark matter detector. To search for the kinds of interactions that smaller particles would be expected to generate, the Rice researchers instead looked for an impulse—one more likely to result from such an “ultraheavy” dark matter particle as it interacted with the detector.

“Instead of looking for a steady signal, we are waiting for very small knocks,” explained Rice postdoctoral researcher Juehang Qin.

Over the course of one month, the team collected observations that focused mainly on quiet overnight periods when vibrations and other environmental disturbances were minimized. Unfortunately, no promising detections were made during this time.

Still, important results can also be derived from a lack of any definitive discoveries, especially when it comes to a field like particle physics. In this case, that’s because the absence of a signal allowed the researchers to place a few constraints on the combinations of dark matter masses and interaction strengths that should have been expected to produce detectable effects.

Altogether, the team’s experiment looked at nine orders of magnitude in its search for possible dark matter particle passes, which included searches for particles as much as 10 million times heavier than those investigated in past similar experiments.

Next Steps

Going forward, the next step would be to increase the experiment’s sensitivity by cooling the magnet even further, observing for longer periods, and eventually successfully levitating several magnets simultaneously. Multiple detectors could also help scientists determine whether real interactions involving dark matter are occurring, as opposed to false positives that might arise from vibrations or other kinds of interference.

Although the Rice team’s work is only a first step, their experiments with a tiny levitating magnet mark a promising pathway toward future potential detections, which may finally unlock new clues to the universe’s mysterious dark matter landscape.

The team’s research was detailed at the 2026 International Conference on Particle Physics and Cosmology, and additional details can be found here.

Micah Hanks is the Editor-in-Chief and Co-Founder of The Debrief. A longtime reporter on science, defense, and technology with a focus on space and astronomy, he can be reached at micah@thedebrief.org. Follow him on X @MicahHanks, and at micahhanks.com.

Researchers at Nagoya University have built a graphene nanoribbon that can switch which way it twists using a natural solvent. Graphene nanoribbons are thin ribbon-shaped structures made of fused carbon rings. Twisted or helical versions of these ribbons show promise for advanced light and electronic devices. However, no graphene nanoribbon could switch that twist on demand, until now.

Scientists have worked out how to switch between a right-handed and left-handed twist (chirality) by changing the solvent around it. The discovery ¹ opens opportunities for new optical switches, chemical sensors, and spintronic components that adapt to changing environments.

Tomoyuki Ikai, lead author and professor at Nagoya University’s Graduate School of Engineering, is a polymer chemist inspired by natural helical structures such as DNA and proteins. Polymers are large molecules built from many small, repeating units linked together in a chain. Ikai had been working on ladder polymers, where each repeating unit is locked into place and cannot freely rotate around the bond connecting to its neighbor (unlike a typical flexible linear polymer).

In 2019, Ikai and his collaborators built the first rigid, helix-shaped polymer. In 2021, they perfected a chemical method to fuse these building blocks together without flaws. This method is what let them build the new graphene nanoribbon.

“We used the same fusion approach already used to make predictable helical ladder polymers. But instead of a stable building block, such as [6]helicene, we used [4]helicene, a 4-ring unit written off as too unstable to be useful,” Ikai said.

Soak, twist, repeat

These units are difficult to control on their own because they switch their chirality too fast to hold one handedness. The team’s method fuses these small, restless units into one long chain. Once joined, they found that a neighbor effect took hold: each unit’s twist began to match its neighbors, and long stretches of the ribbon settled into a single, shared spiral.

To lock it in one overall direction, the researchers dissolved the ribbon in a natural chiral liquid, a liquid made of molecules that come in two mirror-image versions. They tested six candidates before they found the right one: beta-pinene, a compound found in pine trees and citrus peel.

Because beta-pinene molecules can be arranged in left- and right-hand mirror-images, these two versions each push the ribbon toward the opposite spiral. This also changed the twist direction of light the ribbon gave off, a property called circularly polarized luminescence, and is the first graphene nanoribbon shown to switch its light this way.

The switching induced a remarkably high degree of helical bias, with almost all of the helicene units aligning in the same direction. The switching effect is strongest at –90°C and grows weaker as the temperature rises toward room temperature.

“For a long time, people saw [4]helicene as unsuitable for chiral materials, because it could not be controlled,” Ikai said. “In this paper, we show that once you link enough of these units together, the instability itself becomes the useful part.”

A chiral solvent’s nudge toward one handedness is usually very weak on its own. Here, the ribbon’s own structure, with each unit mechanically linked to its neighbors, amplifies that weak nudge into a strong, nearly one-handed result.

An adaptive material

The researchers point to several possible future uses: The switchable light could serve optical devices. The ribbon’s chemical sensitivity to beta-pinene suggests it may work as a chiral sensor, and a similar design could one day help detect hazardous or unstable chemicals. Because graphene conducts electricity well, the ribbon may also suit electronic sensors.

The molecule’s twisted shape connects to spintronics, a field that uses the spin of electrons rather than just their charge. Ikai noted that a right-handed or left-handed structure can, in principle, let electrons of one spin pass through more easily than the other, a property helical structures are known for in physics literature.

The current design only holds its twist while it stays in the chiral liquid. If the solvent is removed, the ribbon drifts back to a mixed, unstable state. Ikai’s next goal is a form of “chiral memory,” a way for the ribbon to lock in its twist even after the solvent is gone. This next step builds on memory techniques the researchers have explored in other helical systems and is now applied to graphene for the first time.

The post First switchable graphene nanoribbon that twists on demand appeared first on Mapping Ignorance.

Dark matter, the invisible substance thought to make up around 85 percent of all mass in the universe, forms an essential part of the standard cosmological model, providing the gravitational glue that holds together entire galaxies. What it actually is, though — and even if it truly exists — remains one of the great mysteries of science.

Now, a bizarre event that occurred nearly a mile underground at the world’s largest dark matter detector in South Dakota, the LZ detector, could be the first direct evidence of the substance. Or it could be something else entirely. Either way, it has scientists mystified and excited.

In a new paper published Tuesday and has been submitted to the journal Physical Review Letters, physicists running the LZ Dark Matter Experiment say that their detector recorded a stunning subatomic interaction that doesn’t fit anything else ever documented in physics.

Again, it’s not necessarily a dark matter discovery — but it’s so unusual that it warranted sharing.

“How do you even make sense of one event?” Tom Shutt, a particle astrophysicist at SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory and cofounder of the LZ project, told Science magazine. “We just decided we should publish and think really, really, really hard about what that event could be.”

Dark matter is a sort of ghost haunting the cosmos. We can’t see it because it doesn’t emit, absorb, or reflect light, or otherwise interact with any ordinary matter — except through gravity. 

We see the fingerprints of its gravitational pull all around the universe, in fact. Galaxies aren’t massive enough to hold themselves together with their own gravity, so without the invisible presence of something with incredible mass, the very realms that define the universe, and which we call home, would fly apart.

There are countless candidates for what dark matter is, but the prevailing theory is that it’s made up of weakly interacting massive particles, or WIMPs. As their feeble acronym suggests, WIMPs are thought to be a hundred times as massive as a proton, but have such a weak nuclear force that they don’t interact with ordinary particles. 

Because of their mass, they move much slower than ordinary particles, too, allowing them to clump together and form giant “halos” that provide the gravitational pull for galaxies to form in. There is no single agreed-upon definition of a WIMP, though, and it’s possible that WIMPs could be a whole family of particles, rather than just one.

If these theories are correct, then every once in a while, errant WIMPs can bump into the nucleus of an unsuspecting atom and create a trace amount of energy.

This is what the LZ detector is built to find. It’s essentially a tank filled with seven tons of liquid xenon, placed 1,480 meters underground in a former gold mine. At such a depth, the preponderance of xenon is shielded from the space radiation that our planet is routinely bombarded with (though there is a still a background level of other interactions that scientists can’t control, but can account for.) Anything that causes a a big enough stir in this controlled, quiet environment would be significant.

After spending years poring over the data the detector has collected so far, the physicists found a striking interaction that took place in 2023. Something, we don’t know what, smashed into a xenon particle, and produced a flash of light. If it was dark matter, it produced more energy than traditional WIMP models predict.

The scientists say that the detection has about a one in 400 chance of being a fluke. Scientific discoveries, though, need to meet at least a five sigma threshold, meaning that there should be only as roughly one in 3.5 million that it’s a fluke.

Still, physicists are absolutely thrilled. Even if this event isn’t a smoking gun by itself, there are other, larger dark matter detectors coming online, such as China’s PandaX experiment and Italy’s XENONnT, that should be able to hunt for the same high energy type of event.

“We can perform this study independently with a blind analysis to validate or invalidate LZ’s claim,” Elena Aprile, a physicist at Columbia University and spokesperson for the XENON experiment, told Science.

More on dark matter: Physicist Proposes Dark Matter Is Made of Black Holes That Survived Dead Universes

The post Something Strange Just Happened With the World’s Largest Dark Matter Detector appeared first on Futurism.

The LUX-ZEPLIN experiment in South Dakota recorded an unexplained flash of light in 2023, suggesting a potential dark matter particle interaction. While the statistical significance of 2.6-sigma indicates low odds of error, much more evidence is needed before confirming a dark matter discovery, which remains elusive despite ongoing research.

Physicists using the LUX-ZEPLIN (LZ) dark matter detector deep underground in a former South Dakota gold mine say they’ve recorded a single particle interaction that they can’t easily explain, but they’re a long way from claiming a discovery.

The post Physicists Spot Curious Signal in Hunt for Elusive Dark Matter Particles appeared first on Sci.News: Breaking Science News.

Dark matter may finally be coming into focus thanks to a recent LUX-ZEPLIN (LZ) experiment, which detected a particle interaction that is difficult to explain as arising from ordinary matter.

Physicists believe that 85% of the matter in the universe is dark matter rather than ordinary matter, but because it neither emits nor reflects light, the mysterious substance effectively remains invisible.

The new findings, described in a recent paper submitted to Physical Review Letters and in a talk at Japan’s 2026 TeV Particle Astrophysics conference, detail the work of dozens of researchers that may constitute an intriguing hint in advance of a confirmed dark matter detection.

LUX-ZEPLIN

A massive international team of 250 scientists and engineers across 39 institutions makes up the LZ project, which conducts its experiment at a facility in South Dakota, almost a mile below ground. This facility, the Sanford Underground Research Facility (SURF), houses the detector, which is optimized to search for weakly interacting massive particles (WIMPS), one of the primary candidates for dark matter.

It does so using ten metric tons of ultrapure liquid xenon in a cylindrical detector. Layers surrounding the chamber block or detect background particles during the dark matter search. If WIMPs collide with xenon atoms, they should produce tiny flashes of light and electrons that can be detected within the chamber.

The nearly mile of rock above the facility helps prevent cosmic rays and other surface radiation from interfering with the experiments. A water tank and outer detectors help shield the central detector from background neutrons, while computational tools separate particle interactions to identify events that may mimic a dark matter observation.

Dark Matter Data

“This was a detailed study in a region we hadn’t explored within this dataset, and we spent months of additional effort to understand all the possible causes of background events,” said lead author Sam Eriksen, a senior research associate at the University of Bristol in the UK.

“We understand our detector and the backgrounds so well that even a single outstanding event, like the one we found, is important. We expect dark-matter events to be extremely rare, so only a handful could mark the first detection of WIMP dark matter,” Eriksen added.

Measurements used in the study were collected between March 2023 and April 2024, totaling 220 live days. The new work wasn’t the first pass on this dataset, as researchers had previously searched it for faint signals from the simplest kinds of WIMP interactions. This time, the team expanded its search to a broader range of possible interactions that could deposit more energy in the detector.

A Possible Dark Matter Detection

“We’re very intrigued to see this event in the data, in the region where we expect dark matter to show up and the competing backgrounds are very low,” said LZ spokesperson Rick Gaitskell, a professor at Brown University. “With only one event, we don’t want to get ahead of ourselves. We are not claiming to have seen dark matter. But we have seen something interesting that we want to share with the scientific community for their input.”

According to researchers, the event was an outlier from other LZ measurements and is consistent with one of the dark matter models the team explored. However, increasingly sensitive technology can ironically reveal previously unseen background processes alongside potentially interesting new signals. The sensitivity of the detectors used at LZ may therefore be measuring a background that earlier instruments missed rather than dark matter.

This detection is rated at 2.6 sigma, about half of the 5-sigma threshold needed to ensure the signal is not background noise. Further observations will be needed to push certainty toward that 5-sigma goal, but this could be a major step in that direction.

The paper, “Search for Dark Matter Particle Interactions in an Extended Nuclear Recoil Energy Window with the LUX-ZEPLIN (LZ) Experiment,” is currently available on the LUX-ZEPLIN website.

Ryan Whalen covers science and technology for The Debrief. He holds an MA in History and a Master of Library and Information Science with a certificate in Data Science. He can be contacted at ryan@thedebrief.org, and follow him on Twitter @mdntwvlf.

Water droplets sliding across solid surfaces can acquire electric potentials of thousands of volts and thereby corrode non-conductive surfaces on metals when they discharge. That is the conclusion of researchers in Germany who say that the poorly-understood phenomenon warrants further investigation to help prevent corrosion of vulnerable outdoor equipment and cultural heritage sites.

Metal corrosion by water droplets is a serious economic and safety issue, and prevention begins with the proper understanding of the relevant processes. Conventional wisdom is that most corrosion is caused by a combination of physical abrasion by the motion of the droplets and chemical degradation from natural acids and anthropogenic pollutants in the water. The notion that electrochemistry might play a significant role in corrosion had not been seriously considered, says physical chemist Hans-Jürgen Butt of the Max Planck Institute for Polymer Research in Mainz.

Part of the reason, he believes, is that, until relatively recently, it was thought that the triboelectric effect (electrically charging objects by rubbing them together) did not work in liquids. “If you have a solid and you rub another insulating solid against it you get electron transfer – I think this has been known for more than 2500 years” he says. However, this relies on atomic-scale roughness of the surface to concentrate charge at specific points where bonds can be broken – and fluids cannot, by definition, be rough.

“If you take a water droplet and let it slide there is some mechanical force from surface tension, but that’s much too low,” says Butt. “There is no way you could generate enough energy locally to pick up an electron or to put an electron or an ion from the water onto the surface.” In the past 10 years, however, it has become increasingly clear that sliding droplets do become highly charged.

Sloping surfaces

In their present work Butt and colleagues deposited water droplets onto copper surfaces covered with 60 nm of Teflon.  When they dropped droplets straight onto the surface, they observed no corrosion. They then deposited droplets first onto a variety of other sloped insulating surfaces such as plant leaves, PVC construction boards and the perfluorooctadecyltrichlorosilane (PFOTS) hydrophobic coating often used on window glass. The droplets ran down these surfaces and then fell onto the Teflon-coated copper. After around 3000 droplet impacts, atomic force microscopy and confocal microscopy revealed evidence that the droplets had corroded both the coating and the underlying copper.

The researchers believe that the droplets become positively charged as they slide down the sloping surface. As they fall onto the coating, the potential difference between the copper and the underlying copper can exceed 1 kV. This is greater than the dielectric breakdown strength of the coating, causing the droplet to discharge. This damages the coating and leaves the underlying metal vulnerable to further oxidation.

To test their hypothesis, the researchers measured charge movement within the copper surface, showing that negative charge flowed towards droplets dripping off insulating surfaces. They also used high-speed cameras to show that, whereas a drop deposited directly retained its spherical shape before impact, a dripping drop was drawn into a cone shape, producing a tip of positive charge that would increase its corrosive capacity.

Uncertain consequences

The practical implications of this are unclear. “Technical coatings on cars, ships etc. are typically 100 microns and thicker, so the process we describe is probably not of direct relevance,”says Butt. However, the phenomenon could be involved in the degradation of monuments and other outdoor historical objects. “We have evidence that surfaces change their properties when you slide charges over them, but the real consequences are not yet known,” explains Butt.

He says his own group is most clearly focused on understanding the fundamental physics involved. “We still don’t know why the heck there is such a charge separation: it’s energetically unfavourable, it should not happen, but it happens.” he says. “The one effect we describe here is, in a way, pretty trivial – everyone knows that if you have a high potential and it’s somehow grounded there is a breakthrough – but what happens at the surface with this deposited charge is not clear.”

Materials scientist Zhong Lin Wang of Georgia Institute of Technology in Atlanta was one of the first researchers to discover the triboelectric effect in liquids, and helped to develop the triboelectric nanogenerator used to quantify it. “The transferred electrons can be kicked back to the water solution, resulting in chemical reaction at the vicinity surface. This process, called contact-electro-catalysis, was first proposed in 2022, and is now an active field of research in chemistry, materials and environmental science.” He says. “[Butt and colleagues] show that the electrons transferred from the water droplet can ‘break’ the surface coating layer and lead to local oxidation. This is an interesting discovery.”

The research is described in Nature.

The post Sliding water droplets corrode Teflon-coated metal appeared first on Physics World.