Computer (rumors) says yes. The iPhone 18 Pro and Apple Watch Series 12 are also expected today.

Wireless headphones are convenient for everyday listening, but they are not always designed for demanding environments. Swimming, outdoor running, heavy workouts, and rainy conditions can quickly expose the limitations of ordinary earbuds. The Monster MH22282 takes a different approach by combining an open-ear neckband design with IPX8 water resistance, built-in storage, Bluetooth 6.0 and a lightweight frame.

Rather than depending entirely on a smartphone, the MH22282 can also operate as a standalone music player through its integrated 32GB memory. That makes it particularly interesting for people who want to exercise without carrying a phone.

Open-Ear Design With a Focus on Active Use

The Monster MH22282, open-ear headphones uses a neckband-style construction that sits around the back of the head and keeps the ears open. This design can be useful during outdoor activities because users can continue to hear music while remaining aware of sounds around them.

The headset weighs just 23.5 grams, according to the product specifications, so it is designed to avoid the heavier feeling associated with some over-ear sports headphones. Its frame uses a flexible titanium memory alloy, while the ear-hook structure is intended to keep the headset stable during movement.

That combination makes the MH22282 better suited to activities such as running, cycling, gym sessions and other situations where a secure fit matters more than a traditional sealed earbud design.

IPX8 Waterproofing Makes Swimming the Main Attraction

One of the most distinctive features of the MH22282 is its IPX8 waterproof rating. Monster’s product listing positions the headset for swimming, workouts, rainy conditions and other situations where exposure to water could be a problem for conventional wireless headphones.

However, there is an important distinction between waterproof hardware and underwater wireless connectivity.

Bluetooth signals do not work reliably underwater, so the MH22282 is designed to use its internal memory when swimming. In other words, users can load music onto the headset before entering the pool and listen without maintaining a Bluetooth connection to a smartphone.

This is arguably more useful than simply calling the headset waterproof. The combination of water resistance and local music storage addresses one of the biggest practical problems with using wireless headphones in waterproof headphones for swimming.

32GB Storage Turns It Into a Standalone Music Player

The built-in 32GB memory is another feature that separates the MH22282 from many conventional Bluetooth headsets.

When the headset is being used for running or swimming, carrying a smartphone can be inconvenient. With headphones with built-in storage, music can be transferred to the headset beforehand, allowing users to leave their phone behind.

The product listing claims that the 32GB storage can hold more than 4,000 songs, although the actual number will depend on file format, bitrate and the size of the individual audio files.

The headset also supports switching between Bluetooth and memory modes, giving users two different ways to listen depending on where they are using it.

For pool workouts, this local-storage approach is particularly important because it removes the need for an underwater Bluetooth connection.

Bluetooth 6.0 for Everyday Wireless Listening

Outside the pool, the Monster MH22282 works as a conventional wireless headset through Bluetooth 6.0.

The specifications list support for HSP, HFP, A2DP and AVRCP profiles, with a stated transmission distance of up to 10 meters. It also supports AAC and SBC audio codecs.

This makes the headset suitable for more than sports. It can be paired with a phone for music, podcasts and calls, or connected to another compatible device for everyday listening.

Bluetooth is therefore the more convenient mode for commuting and general use, while the internal memory becomes more valuable when users are swimming or exercising without a phone.

11.2mm Drivers and Open-Ear Audio

The MH22282 features 11.2mm dynamic drivers. Monster’s listing says the drivers are tuned to provide stronger bass, detailed midrange and clear high frequencies while keeping the ears open to the surrounding environment.

The open-ear approach comes with a different listening experience from sealed in-ear headphones. It does not aim to completely isolate the listener from the outside world. Instead, it provides audio while allowing environmental sounds to remain part of the listening experience. So open-ear vs in-ear headphones are very different.

That can be useful when running outdoors or exercising in shared spaces, although people looking for strong passive isolation or deep noise blocking may prefer a conventional in-ear design.

ENC Is Mainly Useful for Calls

For voice communication, the MH22282 includes microphones and environmental noise cancellation technology.

Monster says its ENC system uses dual microphones to help identify the user’s voice and reduce surrounding noise during calls.

This feature is more relevant to phone calls than music playback. It can be useful when taking calls in places with background noise, although real-world call performance will naturally depend on the environment, wind conditions and the connected phone.

Up to 16 Hours of Playback

Battery life is rated at up to 16 hours of continuous playback, while the listed charging time is approximately two hours. Monster also claims that a 10-minute quick charge can provide around 90 minutes of listening.

Actual battery life will vary according to volume, connection conditions, call usage and other factors, but the claimed 16-hour figure gives the headset enough endurance for extended workouts and daily listening.

For someone who runs regularly or spends several hours at the gym, avoiding daily charging can be a meaningful advantage.

Monster MH22282 Specifications

Feature	Monster MH22282
Design	Open-ear neckband
Model	MH22282
Bluetooth	6.0
Audio codecs	AAC / SBC
Speaker	11.2mm
Internal storage	32GB
Waterproof rating	IPX8
Frequency response	20Hz–20kHz
Bluetooth profiles	HSP / HFP / A2DP / AVRCP
Transmission distance	Up to 10m
Playback time	Up to 16 hours
Charging time	About 2 hours
Microphone	Yes
Noise cancellation	ENC
Weight	23.5g
Dimensions	128 × 98 × 48mm
Color	Black/Orange

Specifications are based on the current product listing and should be treated as manufacturer/merchant-provided figures rather than independent laboratory measurements.

Who Is the Monster MH22282 For?

The MH22282 makes the most sense for users who need more than a standard pair of Bluetooth earbuds.

Swimmers are the clearest target group because the combination of IPX8 protection and onboard storage solves the problem of maintaining a wireless connection underwater.

Runners and outdoor athletes may also appreciate the open-ear design, which avoids completely blocking the ears and keeps the headset lightweight.

Gym users can use Bluetooth for normal smartphone playback or switch to internal storage when they want to exercise without carrying their phone.

It may be less attractive for listeners who prioritize strong passive isolation, compact true-wireless earbuds or a traditional sealed listening experience.

What Makes the MH22282 Different?

Many sports headphones focus on only one major feature, such as water resistance, long battery life or a secure fit. The Monster MH22282 combines several of these ideas into one device.

Its most interesting combination is not Bluetooth 6.0 alone or the 16-hour battery rating. Instead, it is the relationship between IPX8 protection and 32GB internal storage. Bluetooth remains useful for everyday listening, while local storage provides a practical solution when wireless connectivity becomes unreliable underwater.

The 23.5-gram open-ear construction also gives the headset a clear fitness-oriented identity.

Final Thoughts

Monster MH22282 headphone is designed around a simple idea: a sports headset should remain useful when a smartphone or conventional wireless earbuds are no longer convenient.

Its open-ear neckband design, 23.5g weight, Bluetooth 6.0 connectivity and 16-hour claimed playback make it suitable for everyday exercise and wireless listening. More importantly, the combination of IPX8 waterproofing and 32GB internal storage gives it a specific advantage for swimming.

The biggest point to remember is that IPX8 does not mean Bluetooth will work normally underwater. The headset’s built-in memory mode is the practical solution for swimming, allowing music to be stored locally before entering the water.

For athletes who want one lightweight headset for running, gym sessions, outdoor activities and pool workouts, the Monster MH22282 offers a more specialized feature set than a typical Bluetooth headset.

The post Monster MH22282: A Lightweight Open-Ear Headset Built for Swimming and Active Use appeared first on IGeeKphone China Phone, Tablet PC, VR, RC Drone News, Reviews.

As we approach the release of the newest iPhones, Chuck Joiner, Marty Jencius and Chuck Joiner look at how science fiction and popular culture imagined modern communication long before the technology existed. From early video-phone concepts and Dick Tracy to Star Trek, Get Smart, Space: 1999, and more, the panel examine fictional devices that anticipated smartphones, wearables, Bluetooth earbuds, video calls, authentication, mobile computing, and maybe even foreshadow what’s coming next. (Part 1) 

💾

IFA is already filled to the brim with AI, wearables, and robot vacuums. So many robot vacuums.

Editor’s note: This story was originally published in July 2015

What makes a gadget worth wearing? Apple is betting it knows better than anyone, and today they’ll likely reveal the final details of the Apple Watch–the most anticipated piece of technology since, well, the last Apple device to hit the streets.

Apple is rarely a first mover in electronics. We’ve all grown used to the company walking into existing markets and redefining them: the original Macintosh, the iMac, the iPod, the iPhone, the iPad. When it decides to jump in a pool, it strives for an epic cannonball that sends waves throughout the rest of the industry.

Could this time be different? This is, after all, the first major new category Apple will stake out under the stewardship of Tim Cook. The Apple Watch is also unlike anything the company has ever tried before: It’s a device that relies almost as much on fashion as it does technology, with a price tag that some speculate may rise into the $10,000-dollar range when most competing devices cost between $100 and $250. Is this a pure hubris play from Cupertino?

Wearables Whereabouts

Apple’s challenge to sell a look will be more intense than usual. The company has, of course, always focused on aesthetics for its devices–a source of common criticism from competitors and detractors (yet the delight of many consumers). Yet it has never relied so heavily on the buy-in of the fashion community. With models wearing the new smartwatch in magazines and high-end jewelers talking to Apple, clearly the company has its eyes trained on the world of haut-couture. Yet fashion is notoriously fickle; one day’s hot accessory is the next day’s unspeakable faux pas. Even for a company that’s often called elitist, Apple risks selling a device for the few rather than something with mainstream appeal.

Wherever there’s challenge, however, there’s also opportunity–and the wearables market has many. Despite the number of devices clamoring for space on your wrist and on your face, no company has cracked exactly what gives a wearable device mass appeal. Fitbit is perhaps the closest with 70 percent of the fitness-tracker market. Still, they own a niche and one that doesn’t necessarily place it in direct competition with the Apple Watch.

The most direct competitor would be Pebble, which offers what many think is the best smartwatch around. And though it’s made smartwatches since 2013, its products have evolved considerably in that time, and Best Buy continues to sell the devices, finding a truly mainstream market has eluded Pebble.

The startup also isn’t playing in the same league. By my calculations, Pebble has–as of this writing–pre-sold nearly 81,500 of its latest color-screened Pebble Time and Pebble Time Steel smartwatches, bringing in $17 million in revenue. For the sake of comparison Apple, in its most recent quarter, sold 30,000 iPhones per hour and had revenue of $74 billion. Pebble is playing single-A ball; Apple is in the major leagues.

Look at it that way, and the wearables market doesn’t seem so different from the smartphone market before Apple entered. Remember what those devices looked like before the iPhone? Bulky, inconsistent plastic objects with frustratingly small screens and physical keyboards. Fast-forward eight years, and every smartphone looks more or less like an iPhone.

Maybe the Apple Watch will do to wearable devices what the iPod did to MP3 players. But it could just as well be an evolutionary cul-de-sac that ends up in a dustbin next to our PDAs or videophones, to eventually be incorporated into some other far more compelling piece of tech down the road.

Technology That Does Less

The biggest risk for the Apple Watch is the wearable device market as a whole. As of yet, people aren’t crying out for devices to wear on their wrists or faces. They seem futuristic, but perhaps too much–and are better relegated to a retro-future of flying cars and commuting to lunar colonies via rocket ship. The reaction from most of the average folks that I talk to about the Apple Watch is, “why do I need such a thing?”

Take my girlfriend, for example. To her the Apple Watch is just another technological distraction in a world already rife with them. She’s worried that instead of constantly pulling out my phone to check Twitter, reply to text messages, and triage emails, I’ll spend all my time staring at my wrist.

That’s not unjustified. I bought the first iPhone back in 2007, and my friends often joked that it might catch on fire if I didn’t take it out of my pocket, so often did I seem to have it in hand. Eight years later and we’re all glued to our screens, spending far less time engaged with the people around us.

If I have one hope for the Apple Watch, and for wearables in general, it’s that they will make us less dependent on technology. Wearables should dole out the information we want, when we need it, and in bite-size chunks. They shouldn’t further train us to be zombies who constantly stare at screens. The challenge, then, is to smartly and seamlessly integrate technology into daily life while keeping our eyes ahead instead of fixated on glowing slabs (be they phone-sized or watch-sized). If the Apple Watch can deliver on this, then their timing couldn’t be better.

The post From the archive: Can Apple make the first wantable smartwatch? appeared first on Popular Science.

What makes a gadget worth wearing? Apple is betting it knows better than anyone, and today they’ll likely reveal the final details of the Apple Watch–the most anticipated piece of technology since, well, the last Apple device to hit the streets.

Apple is rarely a first mover in electronics. We’ve all grown used to the company walking into existing markets and redefining them: the original Macintosh, the iMac, the iPod, the iPhone, the iPad. When it decides to jump in a pool, it strives for an epic cannonball that sends waves throughout the rest of the industry.

Could this time be different? This is, after all, the first major new category Apple will stake out under the stewardship of Tim Cook. The Apple Watch is also unlike anything the company has ever tried before: It’s a device that relies almost as much on fashion as it does technology, with a price tag that some speculate may rise into the $10,000-dollar range when most competing devices cost between $100 and $250. Is this a pure hubris play from Cupertino?

Wearables Whereabouts

Apple’s challenge to sell a look will be more intense than usual. The company has, of course, always focused on aesthetics for its devices–a source of common criticism from competitors and detractors (yet the delight of many consumers). Yet it has never relied so heavily on the buy-in of the fashion community. With models wearing the new smartwatch in magazines and high-end jewelers talking to Apple, clearly the company has its eyes trained on the world of haut-couture. Yet fashion is notoriously fickle; one day’s hot accessory is the next day’s unspeakable faux pas. Even for a company that’s often called elitist, Apple risks selling a device for the few rather than something with mainstream appeal.

Wherever there’s challenge, however, there’s also opportunity–and the wearables market has many. Despite the number of devices clamoring for space on your wrist and on your face, no company has cracked exactly what gives a wearable device mass appeal. Fitbit is perhaps the closest with 70 percent of the fitness-tracker market. Still, they own a niche and one that doesn’t necessarily place it in direct competition with the Apple Watch.

The most direct competitor would be Pebble, which offers what many think is the best smartwatch around. And though it’s made smartwatches since 2013, its products have evolved considerably in that time, and Best Buy continues to sell the devices, finding a truly mainstream market has eluded Pebble.

The startup also isn’t playing in the same league. By my calculations, Pebble has–as of this writing–pre-sold nearly 81,500 of its latest color-screened Pebble Time and Pebble Time Steel smartwatches, bringing in $17 million in revenue. For the sake of comparison Apple, in its most recent quarter, sold 30,000 iPhones per hour and had revenue of $74 billion. Pebble is playing single-A ball; Apple is in the major leagues.

Look at it that way, and the wearables market doesn’t seem so different from the smartphone market before Apple entered. Remember what those devices looked like before the iPhone? Bulky, inconsistent plastic objects with frustratingly small screens and physical keyboards. Fast-forward eight years, and every smartphone looks more or less like an iPhone.

Maybe the Apple Watch will do to wearable devices what the iPod did to MP3 players. But it could just as well be an evolutionary cul-de-sac that ends up in a dustbin next to our PDAs or videophones, to eventually be incorporated into some other far more compelling piece of tech down the road.

Technology That Does Less

The biggest risk for the Apple Watch is the wearable device market as a whole. As of yet, people aren’t crying out for devices to wear on their wrists or faces. They seem futuristic, but perhaps too much–and are better relegated to a retro-future of flying cars and commuting to lunar colonies via rocket ship. The reaction from most of the average folks that I talk to about the Apple Watch is, “why do I need such a thing?”

Take my girlfriend, for example. To her the Apple Watch is just another technological distraction in a world already rife with them. She’s worried that instead of constantly pulling out my phone to check Twitter, reply to text messages, and triage emails, I’ll spend all my time staring at my wrist.

That’s not unjustified. I bought the first iPhone back in 2007, and my friends often joked that it might catch on fire if I didn’t take it out of my pocket, so often did I seem to have it in hand. Eight years later and we’re all glued to our screens, spending far less time engaged with the people around us.

If I have one hope for the Apple Watch, and for wearables in general, it’s that they will make us less dependent on technology. Wearables should dole out the information we want, when we need it, and in bite-size chunks. They shouldn’t further train us to be zombies who constantly stare at screens. The challenge, then, is to smartly and seamlessly integrate technology into daily life while keeping our eyes ahead instead of fixated on glowing slabs (be they phone-sized or watch-sized). If the Apple Watch can deliver on this, then their timing couldn’t be better.

The post Can Apple Make The First Wantable Smartwatch? appeared first on Popular Science.

Parker Ortolani on the Pebble Index, the recently released AI smart ring:

Ambient computing is here at home on speakers and in the workplace with apps like Wispr Flow, it’s only a matter of time before we carry it with us everywhere.

The Pebble Index is the best preview of that future. The simple gesture of pressing your thumb to your index finger is unbelievably natural. Especially for quick interactions. I’ve found myself setting more reminders, recording ideas, and keeping lists up-to-date. And I know that everything is being logged on my phone in the Pebble app. Better yet, you can connect the Pebble Index to your other AI tools using MCP. There’s also no reason for skeptics to fret, it’s not always listening for hot words or logging everything it hears.

As Ortolani explains, the device ticks a lot of boxes that other AI gadgets just don’t:

The thing that I think strikes me hardest with the Index is that it’s just so socially inoffensive. It’s a form factor people already love, it’s not distracting, it’s not always listening, and it’s affordable. It could be the first truly noncontroversial AI-first hardware.

I ordered a Pebble Index months ago and it should be coming within the next week or so. I bought it for many of the features Ortolani mentions. It’s on-demand, discreet, and a form factor that doesn’t look out of place. The hardware and software matter a lot with a device like this, but if Pebble has nailed it, I can see it becoming my go-to way to jot down brief notes. I’m excited to give it a try and report back.

Meta,privacy,surveillance,glasses,Apple,Vision,AI,Zuckerberg,Ray-Ban,

💾

Is Garmin's new option worth $100 more than the Fitbit Air?

Motorola's Moto Watch looks like a capable and affordable timepiece, but looks are deceiving.

Em sua tradicional newsletter “Power On”, o jornalista Mark Gurman (da Bloomberg) tratou dos planos da Maçã para futuro do Apple Watch. A linha poderá passar por reformulações em seu formato, expandindo a variedade de modelos ofertados — mas essa mudança não estaria no horizonte de curto prazo.

Ainda que o bem-estar seja um pilar basilar do segmento de vestíveis (tanto por parte da Apple quanto na concorrência), a equipe de design industrial da empresa trabalha em novos produtos que funcionem como a resposta da Maçã à expansão da gama de dispositivos vestíveis disponíveis no mercado, sejam os anéis inteligentes ou as pulseiras sem tela.

Gurman salientou, no entanto, que essas mudanças poderão “levar tempo” para chegar ao consumidor final, e que atualizações modestas deverão definir o tom da linha durante pelo menos os próximos dois anos; ele reiterou ainda que a Apple planeja reintroduzir o acabamento em cerâmica — ou agora em setembro, com o “Apple Watch Series 12” e o “Ultra 4”, ou com os modelos que deverão ser apresentados no ano que vem —, além de apresentar melhorias significativas de performance.

Quem lidera a frente de ampliação dos vestíveis da Apple é Eddy Cue, que assumiu o comando do setor de saúde no ano passado. O executivo parece estar atento às iniciativas de empresas como a WHOOP ou a Oura, que redefiniram a relação dos wearables com a integração de recursos de inteligência artificial (IA) — o que, dada a expansão da IA no ecossistema da Maçã, poderá ser um caminho para os diferenciais em termos de software.

Os planos para o futuro, de acordo com o jornalista, envolvem variações de wearables sem telas, que deverão ser ainda mais acessíveis do que o Apple Watch SE, além de variantes que extrapolam a linha Ultra e Hermès. Gurman mencionou que, embora acredite que a hipótese nunca se transformará em um lançamento real, a Apple cogitou ainda a implementação de telas redondas.

Ao fazer um breve passeio pela trajetória do Apple Watch, ele destacou que as suas evoluções, assim como as do iPhone, partiram (e seguem partindo) de mudanças incrementais, sem romper com o formato do relógio apresentado por Tim Cook em 2014. Ao traçar um paralelo com a trajetória dos iPhones, a ampliação dos formatos do Apple Watch lembra a expectativa de que o “iPhone Ultra” redefina o paradigma de formato dos celulares da Maçã.

NOTA DE TRANSPARÊNCIA: O MacMagazine recebe uma pequena comissão sobre vendas concluídas por meio de links deste post, mas você, como consumidor, não paga nada mais pelos produtos/serviços usando os nossos links de afiliado.

Apple has a not-so-obvious heart rate feature that's worth checking out. Here's what it does and how to use it.

Conheça o Pixel Watch 5, o smartwatch da Google que mantém o estilo clássico e será lançado em 12 de agosto.

O post Google destaca design refinado e lança teaser do Pixel Watch 5 para evento em agosto apareceu primeiro em Blog do Edivaldo - Informações e Notícias sobre Linux.

💾

Igeekphone News: August 2, 2026 – Samsung is reportedly preparing to introduce the Galaxy SmartTag 3, the next generation of its Bluetooth tracking accessory, with a redesigned appearance that aligns more closely with the company’s current hardware and software design language.

According to recent leaks, the upcoming smart tracker will feature an all-new rounded-square design, marking a significant departure from its predecessor while maintaining familiar functionality.

A Return to Samsung’s Family Design Language

Based on the leaked information, the Galaxy SmartTag 3 adopts a shape that sits between a square and a circle, featuring gently rounded corners that mirror the aesthetic of One UI app icons and Samsung’s latest wearable devices, including the Galaxy Watch 9.

The redesign represents another evolution in the SmartTag series’ appearance:

• Galaxy SmartTag (1st generation): Rounded-square design
• Galaxy SmartTag 2: Capsule-inspired shape with an integrated keyring opening
• Galaxy SmartTag 3: Refined rounded-square design that emphasizes visual consistency across Samsung’s ecosystem

The updated design appears intended to create a more cohesive look alongside Samsung’s expanding portfolio of Galaxy devices.

Lanyard Hole May No Longer Be Built In

One notable change suggested by the leak is the apparent removal of the integrated lanyard or keyring hole found on the previous generation.

If accurate, users who want to attach the tracker to keys, backpacks, luggage, or other personal belongings may need to purchase a dedicated protective case or accessory with a built-in attachment point.

While this approach could improve the overall aesthetics of the device, it may reduce convenience for users who prefer attaching the tracker directly without additional accessories.

Physical Button Returns for Quick Controls

The leaked design also shows the return of a central physical button, continuing a feature introduced in earlier SmartTag models.

The button is expected to support multiple shortcuts, including:

• Single press: Ring a connected Galaxy smartphone to help locate it nearby.
• Double press: Trigger user-defined automation routines through Samsung’s Modes and Routines feature (formerly known as Bixby Routines).

This functionality allows the tracker to serve not only as a location device but also as a convenient smart home or productivity shortcut.

Expected Features

Although Samsung has yet to announce official specifications, the Galaxy SmartTag 3 is expected to retain the core technologies that power previous models, including:

• Bluetooth connectivity
• Ultra-Wideband (UWB) support for precise directional tracking (on compatible Galaxy devices)
• Compatibility with Samsung’s SmartThings Find network
• Dust and water resistance rated at IP67 or possibly IP68

Some reports also suggest the new tracker could adopt Bluetooth 6.0, potentially improving location accuracy, connection stability, and power efficiency. However, it remains unclear whether battery life will improve over the previous generation.

Expected Launch Timeline

Samsung has not officially confirmed the Galaxy SmartTag 3, but current reports suggest the accessory could debut before the end of 2026.

Industry observers expect it may launch alongside other upcoming Galaxy devices, including the rumored Galaxy S26 FE smartphone and the Galaxy Tab S12 tablet series, as part of Samsung’s year-end product lineup.

Final Thoughts

The leaked Galaxy SmartTag 3 appears to focus on refining Samsung’s existing smart tracking platform rather than introducing major functional changes. A redesigned rounded-square form factor, continued support for Bluetooth and UWB tracking, SmartThings Find integration, and programmable physical controls suggest Samsung is prioritizing design consistency and everyday usability.

If the reported specifications prove accurate, the Galaxy SmartTag 3 could become a compelling option for Galaxy users seeking a reliable item tracker that integrates seamlessly with Samsung’s broader ecosystem. More details, including pricing, battery performance, and regional availability, are expected to emerge closer to the product’s official launch.

The post Samsung Galaxy SmartTag 3 Leak Suggests New Rounded-Square Design Ahead of Expected Year-End Launch appeared first on IGeeKphone China Phone, Tablet PC, VR, RC Drone News, Reviews.