❌

Normal view

OM System PEN preorders are officially open β€” here are the best retailers, plus where to get a free strap

Looking for the perfect compact everyday shooter for travel or street photography? The brand-new OM System PEN could be a fantastic option for you. Preorders are now open for this affordable new rangefinder-style camera ahead of an October 1st release date, and several retailers have already updated their sites with listings.

Probably the best option for preorder today is over at Adorama, where you can get yourself a free wrist strap alongside both the body-only and kit-lens options. The strap in question is a black Clever Supply Skinny Wrist Strap worth $54, so it's definitely a nice little freebie that should complement your new camera nicely.

If you're in the UK (or USA but would prefer to order a camera elsewhere), I've attached a roundup of other options below. Major retailers like B&H Photo, Wex Video Photo, and Park Cameras are all stocking the camera today, so there should (hopefully) be plenty of stock available for early adopters.

Note that the OM System Pen starts at $999.99 / Β£849 for the body, with additional kit lens options. The lens kit, meanwhile, with the new M.Zuiko 14-42mm f/3.5-5.6 III, is just an additional $100 / Β£100, which could be a better value option if you're new to the system, and looks like a particularly good option for travel photography. Not only is this kit a bargain, but the lens is also weather-sealed (unlike previous iterations).

Where to buy the OM System PEN

Current OM System PEN retailers

US retailers

UK retailers

What's new with the PEN?

OM System PEN on a stone surface alongside an Olympus lens

(Image credit: OM System)
  • 2.36-million-dot OLED EVF
  • IPX1-rated dust-and-splash resistance
  • BLS-7 battery with USB-C charging

Much of the PEN's spec sheet will seem familiar to fans of the brand. As with most releases from OM System, the PEN is essentially re-using a lot of pre-existing tech in a new body at a lower price. However, its combination of a retro compact body, built-in viewfinder, image stabilization, weather resistance and accessible price makes it an attractive entry-level mirrorless camera, particularly for smartphone users.

Unlike the previous Olympus EP-7, the PEN now features a 2.36-million-dot OLED electronic viewfinder as well as IPX1-rated dust-and-splash resistance. Internally, you're still getting the familiar 20.4MP Micro Four Thirds sensor with 5-axis image stabilisation rated to 5.5EV, but the 121-point phase-detection autofocus with subject detection is a key upgrade.

Other upgrades include OM System's latest computational photography features, namely Live ND, new color profiles, and two Cinema picture modes aimed at 4K video. Like the higher-end OM-3, the PEN is designed from the ground up for JPEG customization thanks to a new color/monochrome switch which provides quick access to film-inspired looks.

Finally, it's worth mentioning that the PEN debuts a new BLS-7 battery, rated for an impressive 410 shots per charge, as well as support for USB-C charging - another massive boon for travel photography.

Is the PEN worth preordering?

Fujifilm X-M5 camera with 15-45mm lens, in the hand

The PEN is a great alternative to the Fujifilm X-M5 (Image credit: Future / Tim Coleman)

We haven't fully reviewed the OM System PEN yet, but my initial impression of the camera is positive. It's 'nothing new', so to speak, but the rock-bottom price that the brand is aiming for has the potential to make this one a crowd favorite.

For one, I don't think any other brand is offering a package quite like this for $1,000. With inflation and various tariffs, we've become accustomed to spiralling costs, so it's refreshing to see a brand-new camera with a viewfinder, weather sealing, and a stylish design for this price.

Perhaps the closest competitor to the OM System PEN is the Fujifilm X-M5 - one of our favorite entry-level cameras here at TechRadar. Both cameras share a stunning rangefinder-style design and enticing price point, but the PEN looks like the better choice for photographers, in my opinion. The X-M5 has far superior video specs, but it lacks image stabilization, a viewfinder, and weather sealing.

With such features, the PEN looks like a very, very compelling budget option compared to the likes of the Fujifilm X-E5. That's another one of our favorite rangefinder-style bodies, but it comes in at an eye-watering $1,799 / Β£1,399 for the body-only. In comparison, the PEN is a more entry-level body, but it's definitely a good option if you're happy with 20MP.

Apple preps privacy-first home security cameras and monitoring service

4 September 2026 at 18:00

Apple logo with security lock

Apple is preparing a dedicated home-security product line and a companion monitoring service, according to Bloomberg News’ Mark Gurman, as the company maps a broader expansion of its smart-home business beyond next week’s iPhone event.

In a Sept. 4 report on Apple’s product pipeline under new Chief Executive Officer John Ternus, Gurman said the company is working on an in-home security sensor and system slated for 2027. The device is described as a privacy-centric camera and automation accessory that would use artificial intelligence to watch a room’s environment rather than continuously storing traditional video footage. That hardware, he wrote, is expected to tap into a new Apple home-security and monitoring service.

The framing is consistent with earlier Gurman reporting that Apple has been developing battery-powered security hardware β€” previously discussed as a camera and later as a small sensor, internally associated with the J450 project β€” that can recognize people, use infrared sensing, and trigger automations such as lights or music when a household member enters or leaves a room. Apple has also been said to be exploring a wider lineup that could eventually include additional cameras and a facial-recognition doorbell aimed at rivals such as Amazon’s Ring and Google’s Nest.

A service layer would be a notable shift. Apple already offers HomeKit Secure Video through iCloud, but Gurman’s latest account points to a more complete security and monitoring offering β€” the kind of recurring product that could sit alongside Apple’s other subscription businesses. Industry coverage of the same Bloomberg report has noted that such a service could later be bundled into Apple One, though Apple has not announced pricing, professional monitoring, or how much processing would stay on-device.

The security push is part of a larger home reset. Gurman and other reports have said Apple is first rolling out refreshed living-room hardware, including a new Apple TV 4K, an updated HomePod mini, and a screen-equipped home hub often referred to as a HomePad, before the 2027 security system arrives. The company has long lagged Amazon and Google in connected-home hardware even as it has marketed privacy as a differentiator. An AI-first sensor that avoids constant video recording would be an attempt to turn that brand position into a product category.

Apple has not publicly confirmed the devices or the service. Details on design, battery life, outdoor coverage, emergency dispatch, and whether video would still be captured after an AI alert remain unreported. What Gurman’s reporting does make clear is that Apple now sees home security as both a hardware line and a services opportunity β€” and that the company is targeting 2027 to bring them to market together.
β€Ž
MacDailyNews Take: This will be great – as long as it works with our Eufy cameras!


β€Ž
Please help support MacDailyNews β€” and enjoy subscriber-only articles, comments, chat, and more β€” by subscribing to our Substack: macdailynews.substack.com. Thank you!

Support MacDailyNews at no extra cost to you by using this link to shop at Amazon.

The post Apple preps privacy-first home security cameras and monitoring service appeared first on MacDailyNews.

MacVoices #26244: Live! – Flock Cameras, Cyber Mercenaries, and the Data Center Backlash

By: Chuck
31 August 2026 at 20:04
Flock cameras have ignited a debate over surveillance, privacy, data collection, and public resistance. The MacVoices panel weighs in on the debate. They also discuss the risks of government-sponsored cyberattacks carried out by private companies, growing opposition to data centers over power and infrastructure demands, and the regulatory challenges surrounding their expansion.

πŸ’Ύ

MacVoices #26214: Driver Cameras, Dash Cams, and Who is Watching What

By: Chuck
21 July 2026 at 20:51
Cameras in airline seatback screens and increasingly sophisticated driver-monitoring systems spark a debate over safety, privacy, data access, and surveillance. The MacVoices Live! panel examines EU vehicle requirements, Tesla interior cameras, dash cams, accident evidence, connected devices, and whether consumers receive enough disclosure and control over technologies designed to watch them. Panel members include: Chuck […]

πŸ’Ύ

MacVoices #26209: Apple Stock Recovers, iCloud Is Required, and More iPhone Foldables

By: Chuck
15 July 2026 at 00:08
Apple’s stock rebounds after recent product price increases, prompting a discussion of customer loyalty, upgrade timing, refurbished options, and long-term confidence in the company. Chuck Joiner, David Ginsburg, Eric Bolden, Jim Rea, and Marty Jencius also examine why advanced Home features may require a 2TB iCloud+ plan, then debates Apple’s rumored foldable iPhone, including price, […]

πŸ’Ύ

Thinking of trying to photograph the eclipse? I tried so hard to shoot the last one with my iPhone Pro Max and my DSLR β€” but in the end I'm glad I abandoned both

This article was originally published in April 2024, following the total solar eclipse in the US. The experience in advice is relevant for those thinking about attempting to photograph the 2026 eclipse β€” which will be total in parts of Iceland, Spain and Portugal, and there will be major partial eclipse in the UK and other European countries β€” so we're sharing it again.

If you’ve never seen a total eclipse in person, whatever you’ve seen and what you imagine don’t come close. The best photos, the most stunning video, they won’t match the silent, dazzling fury of the real thing. Your phone or monitor won’t capture the infinite diamond brilliance of the Sun’s corona twinkling around the black Moon.

I set out to shoot the total eclipse with my three best camera phones and my Nikon DSLR, but I am thankful that I decided to enjoy the eclipse in the scant three minutes I was under its totality.

Before I talk tech, I’ll do my best to describe the total solar eclipse if you’ve never seen one in person. April 8, 2024 was my first total eclipse, and before that day I thought it would be my last.

After seeing the total solar eclipse live, I felt like I can’t live the rest of my life without seeing one again. I’ve never seen a photo that was equally compelling. Seeing the real eclipse in person, it was so gloriously beautiful that I was immediately sad that it was so fleeting.

Here's what a total solar eclipse really looks like

I was not shocked to hear the crowd around me erupt into spontaneous applause.

There is a bright flash in the instant before the Sun goes dark. The world gets colder suddenly, but the landscape is not pitch dark. Watching the eclipse from the shore of Lake Champlain in Burlington, Vermont, the view of Mount Marcy and the Adirondacks presented a panoramic sunset, with waning light surrounding me at the horizon on all sides, and the black eclipse at the center.

The Sun’s corona dazzles and flares with wisps of magic. You’ve never seen any light move in such a way. The contrast between the shockingly dark moon and the incredibly bright corona makes the halo seem brilliant and crisply present, as though the Sun is just beyond your grasp, and not seven light-minutes away.

The corona is bright, but not as bright as the face of the Sun. It reaches the limit of what my eyes could tolerate without causing pain. To see something so shockingly intense, after avoiding the painfully bright Sun for the previous hour, is a revelation. It feels like a gift being unwrapped in the sky above. It is a surprise and a joy, and I was not shocked to hear the crowd around me erupt into spontaneous applause.

I was awestruck. I forgot everything I was supposed to do at that moment. I’m now grateful that I decided at the last minute to drive all the way up to Burlington, where the clouds were wispy and few and the totality lasted more than three whole minutes. A good friend traveled farther to experience just over thirty seconds of totality in the Ozarks. Neither of us regrets taking our trip.

Ruining a solar eclipse with too much tech

Total Solar Eclipse April 8 photos of the sun and the crowd watching the eclipse in Burlington VT

The eclipse shot with iPhone 15 Pro Max and Vaonis Hestia telescope (Image credit: Philip Berne/ Future)

Back to the tech. My plan was … too much. I brought a telescope, and a DSLR, and three phones, and even smart glasses on my face. I don’t know what I was thinking. The eclipse lasted three minutes. I barely had time to focus one camera, let alone try to shoot with five. My plans fell to pieces, and I gave up quickly. I got a few good shots, then I turned my attention to the sky and just allowed myself to soak it in.

Seeing the eclipse was more rewarding than the best photo I’ve seen of the eclipse.

Here’s the gear I brought to shoot the solar eclipse. I borrowed a Vaonis Hestia telescope, which uses your phone as the viewfinder. I used an iPhone 15 Pro Max to take photos and view the eclipse through that telescope, with a solar filter provided by Vaonis. Those photos turned out pretty good, but it isn’t the most powerful telescope. Plus, an eclipse is a very complicated scene for lighting, especially for a phone camera.

Total eclipse shot through Vaonis Hestia telescope showing partial eclipse
Philip Berne / Future
Total eclipse shot through Vaonis Hestia telescope showing partial eclipse
Philip Berne / Future
Total eclipse shot through Vaonis Hestia telescope showing partial eclipse
Philip Berne / Future

I also had a Google Pixel 8 Pro and a Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra. I already decided I was not going to try to take telephoto zoom shots of the eclipse with these phones. The 5X range is simply not enough to capture any detail, and the sensor for the longest lens is also the smallest, lowest-quality sensor on the phone. Better to take wide-angle photos.

I set up the Galaxy S24 Ultra to shoot a time-lapse (Samsung calls it Hyperlapse) video of the entire event. I was pretty disappointed with the results. The sun was too high in the sky for even the widest lens to capture the scene around me as well as the eclipse in progress. The camera had trouble balancing the incredibly bright partial eclipse with the surroundings, so it just looks like a sunny day until totality occurs. When the eclipse happens, the camera balances the light in a way that doesn’t present the sunset colors and the changing light in the way I remember it.

Total Solar Eclipse April 8 photos of the sun and the crowd watching the eclipse in Burlington VT

The eclipse shot with Pixel 8 Pro and a solar filter (Image credit: Philip Berne/ Future)

I attached a solar filter to the Google Pixel 8 Pro, hoping I would be able to see more of the partial eclipse as it happened. Nope, the filter cut out too much light for the phone to handle. I was barely able to see the Sun through the filter, let alone capture great shots.

At the last minute, I decided to also bring my Nikon D750 camera with a Nikon 80-400mm lens. I don’t have a solar filter for that huge lens, so I planned on shooting only the totality of the eclipse, when it is safe to look at the sun without glasses. I got some pretty good shots, but I was rushing around too much, juggling too many chores. I should have reduced the exposure levels, or used a manual mode to dial back the shutter speed. The photos were blurry and blown out, not very good.

Total solar eclipse april 8 corona around the sun

Eclipse shot with Nikon D750 at 400mm (Image credit: Philip Berne / Future)
Panorama of the view of the total solar eclipse on Lake Champlain Vermont
Philip Berne / Future
People watching the total solar eclipse on the shore of Lake Champlain Vermont
Philip Berne / Future
People watching the total solar eclipse on the shore of Lake Champlain Vermont
Philip Berne / Future
People watching the total solar eclipse on the shore of Lake Champlain Vermont
Philip Berne / Future

In the end, I got a couple of good shots from the iPhone on the telescope. They were better than the shots my friends took with their phones, and they impressed the people I shared them with. From my own perfectionist standards, I was disappointed with my pics, but I wasn’t disappointed at all with the experience.

In fact, I’m happy that I didn’t try much harder to take great photos, because at the last minute I chose to sacrifice the pics and enjoy the eclipse. It was amazing. It was the greatest natural phenomena I’ve ever seen. For the next eclipse, I’ll bring only one camera, and only one easy plan, and if I screw it up then I won’t even care. The best photo I could get would pale in comparison to the totality of the real thing.

You might also like...

How to Choose a Camera (2026): Sensors, Megapixels, Terms

10 August 2026 at 11:33
Shopping for a camera can be confusing. Here’s how to sift through the acronyms, sensor options, and extra features to find the best one for you.

The FCC could start banning DJI drones that have previously been approved, and DJI isn't happy about it

9 August 2026 at 13:30
  • The FCC wants to take 'military-grade' DJI drones off sale
  • Numerous DJI models would be affected
  • You can comment on the proposals until September 2

There's been a ban on new DJI drones and cameras in the US since last December, but now the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) is making moves to retroactively take some models off shelves that were approved before the ban came into effect.

Specifically, the FCC wants to pull "military-grade" drones from stores (via PCMag), which apparently includes every model with LiDAR obstacle avoidance or thermal cameras. That would affect drones such as the DJI Air 3S, the DJI Avata 360, the DJI Mini 5 Pro, and the DJI Mavic 3T, for example.

Drones that weigh over 55 pounds (nearly 25 kilograms) will be included in the retroactive ban, as well models that use docking stations. The criteria laid out by the FCC is broad enough to cover a substantial number of drones in DJI's current range.

Now, if you've already bought one of these drones in the US, the FCC isn't going to come and take it off you. However, unless the regulator changes course, these models won't be available to buy in the US from September 2.

You can take action

The FCC is considering new restrictions that could affect DJI drones already on the U.S. market – not just future products.Despite being framed around β€œmilitary-grade” drones, the proposal could also capture civilian technologies such as thermal imaging, LiDAR, docking… pic.twitter.com/EdS1vziWxzAugust 7, 2026

DJI has already complained long and hard about the original ban, pointing out that its drones were blacklisted for security reasons without any actual security audit taking place. It's also taking a very dim view of the new proposals by the FCC.

"People could continue using DJI products they already own, but the same models in use today might no longer be available to purchase in the future," says DJI in a blog post. "This is a total reversal from the FCC's previous position, and it is U.S. operators that would bear the cost."

DJI argues that safety agencies, small businesses, and farmers in the US who rely on DJI equipment will be faced with more expensive and difficult upgrades in the future, and it's asking for the public's support while the FCC proposal is considered.

You can have your say during the public comment period up until September 2: head to the Drone Advocacy Alliance website to make your feelings known, and to explain to the FCC how you use drones and their capabilities for non-military purposes.

FaceTime Dual Capture: iOS 27’s Biggest Video Call Upgrade

By: Hannah
6 August 2026 at 22:31

FaceTime Dual Capture is bringing simultaneous front-and-rear camera streaming to video calls in iOS 27, allowing compatible iPhones to show the caller and their surroundings without repeatedly switching between cameras.

The feature expands technology Apple introduced with the iPhone 17 family. Dual Capture already allows the Camera app to record through the Center Stage front camera and a rear camera at the same time. iOS 27 brings a similar capability directly into live FaceTime calls.

During a call, the front camera can continue showing the speaker while the rear camera displays whatever the iPhone is pointing toward. Someone attending a concert can share the performance and remain visible. A parent can show a child playing without disappearing from the conversation. A person asking for technical assistance can remain on screen while directing the rear camera toward the equipment causing the problem.

Dual Capture removes the awkward sequence of switching to the rear camera, showing something, and switching back to continue speaking face to face. Both perspectives remain available inside the same call.

Close-up of the FaceTime app icon on a screen, showing a green background with a white video camera symbol and the label β€œFaceTime” below it. Highlighted in this iOS 27 interface, a finger is partially visible near the icon.
Image Credit: Thomas Trutschel Photothek/Getty Images

FaceTime Dual Capture Changes Camera Switching

The normal FaceTime camera control changes from a simple front-or-rear choice on supported iPhones. When the caller activates the rear camera, iOS 27 keeps the front camera visible by default.

The main view displays the rear camera feed while a smaller window contains the front camera image. This picture-in-picture arrangement gives the other participant a continuous view of the caller’s reaction, commentary, or explanation.

To activate both cameras during a supported FaceTime call:

FaceTime > Start a video call > Tap the Flip button

Tapping the Flip button turns on the rear camera without immediately removing the front view. The other participant begins receiving both perspectives as part of the FaceTime stream.

The caller can disable the front view when it is no longer needed. This provides a conventional rear-camera presentation for situations where the surroundings should occupy the complete image.

To return to a single camera view:

FaceTime > Tap the camera view > Disable the front camera

The exact labels and placement may change before the public release of iOS 27 because the feature is still being tested in beta software. Its basic behavior is already established: the Flip control activates the rear camera while retaining the front camera feed.

Dual Capture does not create two independent FaceTime calls. Both images belong to one video stream, so the caller does not need a second account, device, or invitation.

The feature also differs from screen sharing. FaceTime screen sharing transmits applications and interface activity from the iPhone display. Dual Capture transmits live video from two physical cameras.

A hand holds a smartphone, recording a video of four people in costume outdoors. A small FaceTime Dual Capture window at the top shows two people smiling during the call. The phone’s screen displays camera controls, powered by iOS 27.
Image Source: Google

Which iPhones Support Dual Capture

Apple has limited FaceTime Dual Capture transmission to the iPhone 17, iPhone 17 Pro, iPhone 17 Pro Max, and iPhone Air. Each model includes Apple’s 18MP Center Stage front camera and the Dual Capture capability introduced in the Camera app.

An older iPhone that supports iOS 27 cannot originate a Dual Capture stream. It continues to use the normal option of selecting either the front camera or a rear camera during a call.

Older models can still receive and display a Dual Capture feed when they are running iOS 27. This allows an iPhone 16 or another supported device to see both views transmitted from an iPhone 17, even though it cannot send the same presentation back.

Both participants need iOS 27 for the new FaceTime layout to work as intended. The transmitting device must also be one of the supported iPhone 17-generation models.

This limitation is based on Apple’s official feature support rather than the simple presence of front and rear cameras. Earlier iPhones have camera hardware capable of operating in several multi-camera applications, but Apple has not extended its native Dual Capture implementation to them.

Third-party applications have offered forms of simultaneous multi-camera recording for years through Apple’s developer frameworks. The difference is that iOS 27 integrates the experience into FaceTime, where users can activate it through the familiar camera-switching control.

iPhone 17 Owners Receive a Second Dual Capture Feature

Describing FaceTime Dual Capture as retro-compatible with the iPhone 17 does not fully explain its relationship with the hardware. The iPhone 17 family introduced Apple’s native Dual Capture recording in 2025, and iOS 27 now gives that existing camera system another purpose.

Inside the Camera app, Dual Capture produces a saved video containing front and rear views. Apple lists support for recording at up to 4K Dolby Vision at 30 frames per second on the iPhone 17.

FaceTime uses the camera pairing for live communication instead. Network quality, bandwidth, device temperature, and FaceTime processing can affect the transmitted resolution, so users should not assume that a call will preserve the Camera app’s maximum 4K recording specification.

The Center Stage front camera also contributes more than resolution. Its square sensor gives the iPhone greater freedom to adjust framing without requiring the device to be physically rotated. Center Stage can help keep the caller positioned inside the smaller front-camera view while the rear camera follows the subject being shared.

That combination makes Dual Capture more useful than placing two untreated camera feeds beside each other. FaceTime can preserve the speaker’s presence while directing most of the screen toward the event, object, or location being discussed.

The feature may require more processing power and energy than an ordinary single-camera call. Running two camera sensors while encoding and transmitting live video can increase battery consumption and device temperature, especially during long calls over cellular data.

Apple has not published separate battery estimates for Dual Capture FaceTime calls. Users planning extended sessions may want access to power and a stable Wi-Fi connection.

FaceTime

iOS 27 Prepares FaceTime for iPhone 18

FaceTime Dual Capture arrives shortly before Apple’s expected iPhone 18 generation, making it likely to become part of how the company demonstrates the new phones’ camera and communication abilities.

Apple has not announced the iPhone 18 lineup or confirmed its final camera specifications. Compatibility with FaceTime Dual Capture is therefore expected from the software’s β€œiPhone 17 and newer” positioning, but individual iPhone 18 models should not be treated as confirmed until Apple presents them.

The software release gives existing iPhone 17 owners access without requiring another hardware purchase. That approach also provides Apple with a working FaceTime feature before the next iPhone launch rather than introducing the camera mode and communication interface at the same moment.

Future hardware could improve the experience through faster processors, stronger image stabilization, upgraded sensors, or more efficient video encoding. None of those additions is required for the supported iPhone 17 family, which already contains the camera system needed to transmit both views.

Dual Capture is only one part of the FaceTime update. Apple is also improving video-call quality when the network connection is weak, addressing a problem that becomes especially relevant when two live camera views require transmission. Traditional Chinese support is joining FaceTime Live Captions as well.

The weak-connection improvement may determine how dependable Dual Capture becomes away from Wi-Fi. A feature designed for travel, events, repairs, and outdoor calls needs to tolerate changes in cellular bandwidth without freezing both views or forcing the session to end.

FaceTime Dual Capture remains part of the iOS 27 beta as Apple prepares the public update for September. Apple can still adjust the interface, performance, device requirements, and picture-in-picture behavior before the completed software reaches iPhone 17 owners.

The post FaceTime Dual Capture: iOS 27’s Biggest Video Call Upgrade appeared first on AppleMagazine.

Supostos Γ³culos da Apple poderΓ£o ter foco em recursos de saΓΊde

3 August 2026 at 15:18

De acordo com Mark Gurman, jornalista da Bloomberg, a Apple pretende transformar seus futuros Γ³culos e headsets em dispositivos voltados Γ  saΓΊde.

Na ediΓ§Γ£o mais recente da newsletter β€œPower On”, ele ressaltou que a ideia jΓ‘ havia sido levantada durante o desenvolvimento do Apple Vision Pro, que contaria com uma versΓ£o do Apple Fitness+ com execuΓ§Γ£o local β€” permitindo que o dispositivo auxiliasse os usuΓ‘rios no acompanhamento dos seus treinos e na anΓ‘lise dos movimentos β€”, mas o recurso foi descartado.

A ideia, no entanto, parece viva para novos dispositivos, como os rumorados Γ³culos inteligentes da Apple. O que ressalta essa especulaΓ§Γ£o Γ© a descriΓ§Γ£o de uma vaga para uma lideranΓ§a estratΓ©gica de design de produto.

Com vinculaΓ§Γ£o ao Vision Products Group, a demanda envolve β€œdefinir o futuro das experiΓͺncias de saΓΊde, bem-estar e condicionamento fΓ­sico nos produtos de computaΓ§Γ£o espacial”, transformando β€œoportunidades ambΓ­guas na interseΓ§Γ£o entre computaΓ§Γ£o espacial, vestΓ­veis, saΓΊde do consumidor e comportamento humano”.

Caso esse direcionamento se concretize a partir da estreia da Apple no segmento dos Γ³culos inteligentes, essa abordagem β€” somada Γ  integraΓ§Γ£o com o seu ecossistema β€” pode se tornar a sua marca registrada em relaΓ§Γ£o a competidores estabelecidos desse mercado, como a Meta.

Novos AirPods ainda em 2026?

Questionado sobre o futuro dos AirPods, Gurman rememorou que, embora a primeira versΓ£o dos AirPods com cΓ’meras integradas a recursos de inteligΓͺncia artificial (IA) β€” de codinome B798 β€” tenha sido adiada para 2027, uma segunda versΓ£o encontrada no cΓ³digo do iOS 27, sob o codinome B790, pode sugerir que a estreia dessa reformulaΓ§Γ£o dos fones ocorrerΓ‘ ainda em 2026.

Render dos supostos AirPods Pro com cΓ’mera
Imagem: ChatGPT

O jornalista mencionou, ainda, que a ΓΊltima variante estaria no cronograma interno da Apple com previsΓ£o de lanΓ§amento jΓ‘ para este ano.

AirPods Max 2

Chip: H2
Cores: azul, roxo, meia-noite, estelar ou laranja
R$Β 5.999,00
R$Β 6.590,00

AirPods Max

Chip: H1
Cores: azul, roxo, meia-noite, estelar ou laranja
R$Β 3.270,39

AirPods Pro 3

R$Β 2.333,32
R$Β 2.699,00

AirPods 4 com Cancelamento Ativo de RuΓ­do

R$Β 1.699,00
R$Β 1.999,00

AirPods 4

R$Β 1.298,70
R$Β 1.499,00

NOTA DE TRANSPARÊNCIA: O MacMagazine recebe uma pequena comissΓ£o sobre vendas concluΓ­das por meio de links deste post, mas vocΓͺ, como consumidor, nΓ£o paga nada mais pelos produtos/serviΓ§os usando os nossos links de afiliado.

Canon tipped to release three new EOS R mirrorless cameras before the end of 2026 β€” I know which one I’m most excited for

25 July 2026 at 15:00
  • Canon registered three cameras with the wireless certification agency, indicating three more cameras will come soon
  • Rumors suggest we’ll see an EOS R7 Mark II, an EOS R10 Mark II and an EOS R8 Mark II
  • The EOS R8 Mark II may well be a retro-styled tribute to the analog AE-1, which turns 50 this year

The first half of 2026 was pretty dry for camera releases, but as we enter the second half of the year, manufacturers have been making up for lost time. Canon in particular looks like it’s going to have a busy back half of the year, with not one, not two, but three new EOS R mirrorless cameras setting the rumor mill alight.

It should be stressed that currently this is all unconfirmed β€” we don’t know that Canon is going to release anything. But Canon has registered three new cameras with the wireless certification agency, which is generally the point that you know that something is coming very soon. And reporting by the oft reliable Canon Rumors indicates that Canon is updating three of its most popular EOS R cameras, and one in particular looks like a very exciting prospect indeed.

And if that weren’t enough, we’re also potentially due a new PowerShot compact, with Canon looking to capitalize on the success of its phenomenally popular PowerShot G7 X Mark III compact. But we’ve more details on the mirrorless side of things, so let’s take a closer look at what could be coming…

Canon EOS R8 II β€”Β could it be the digital AE-1 we’re all hoping for?

Rumors indicate that Canon’s lightweight full-frame EOS R8 is likely to get a successor in mid-September. As that camera is now more than three years old, this is about the time we might expect an update to come along. However, the really exciting news is that the new version may be an entirely new prospect β€” a retro-styled Canon AE-1 throwback that fans have been begging the company to make for years.

Canon AE-1 camera on a blue surface and pastel background alongside a roll of Fujifilm Velvia film

The Canon AE-1 is a legend among film photographers. (Image credit: Shutterstock | Lius Hanzen)

There have been rumors for quite some time that Canon is working on a retro-styled digital camera, just like Nikon did with its Zf, and given that this year marks the 50th anniversary of the AE-1, a legendary film SLR beloved by amateur photographers for its streamlined controls and ease of use, it makes sense that this could be the year.

The rumored specs for the EOS R8 II are that it’ll use a 32.5MP full-frame sensor, 40fps burst shooting via the electronic shutter, in-body image stabilization, oversampled 4K video and two UHS-II SD card slots. Pretty much what you’d expect for a mid-range full-frame camera.

Canon EOS R8 on a table side upside down with battery door open and battery on the table

The original EOS R8 features just one card slot β€” so two would be a welcome upgrade! (Image credit: Future)

I’ll be interested to see if the retro styling is purely cosmetic β€” it might even be the case that Canon releases a β€˜standard’ EOS R8 Mark II version as well as the retro-tinged variant β€” or if it has any bearing on how the camera operates. There’s nothing in the rumor mill to suggest this, but personally, I think it would be smart for Canon to dip its toe into film-style looks for images, similar to Fujifilm’s Film Simulations or Panasonic’s in-camera Real Time LUTs.

Yes, Canon has its β€˜Picture Styles’, but let’s be honest: nobody uses them, and they don’t have the cool factor of Fujifilm’s Film Simulations. I’d love to see Canon throw its weight into some really crisp, dynamic, analog-style looks for shooters who want great-looking JPEGs straight out of camera. And come on β€” there will never be a better opportunity to debut them than in a digital AE-1!

Canon EOS R7 II β€”Β let’s see a stacked APS-C sensor!

Also on the rumored docket is an update to the Canon EOS R7, a mid-range APS-C mirrorless camera that arrived in 2022. The original EOS R7 was something of a speedster, with burst speeds of 15fps with the mechanical shutter and up to 30fps with the electronic. And if rumors are correct, Canon might be doubling down on this by giving the EOS R7 II a stacked sensor design.

This would be the first stacked APS-C sensor for Canon’s lineup β€” indeed, currently the only APS-C camera with a stacked sensor is the Fujifilm X-H2S. A stacked sensor design moves the circuitry to the rear for faster readout, enabling higher burst speeds, superior autofocus tracking and blackout-free viewfinder shooting.

The Canon EOS R7 camera sitting on a stone step

The original EOS R7 is Canon's top-end APS-C model. (Image credit: Future)

Considering that the EOS R7 was already an impressively speedy shooter, a stacked sensor design would push a mark II to pretty impressive heights β€” we could see autofocus and speed-shooting performance on par with professional or serious enthusiast cameras. Rumors also indicate that the sensor resolution might be upped to 39MP, from 32.5MP on the original EOS R7.

Canon EOS R10 II β€” the new beginner mirrorless to beat?

Rumors also indicate that we’ll see an update to Canon’s popular beginner model, the EOS R10, in the form of the EOS R10 Mark II. Details are very thin on the ground for this one, beyond the fact that it is on its way and due in the latter half of 2026. This is also likely to be the first of the new models we see.

The Canon EOS R10 has been a huge seller for Canon since its release in 2022 alongside the EOS R7. It’s not the cheapest in the EOS R lineup, with both the EOS R50 and the EOS R100 coming in under its price, but it’s a pretty affordable camera, with a lightweight build, intelligent autofocus and reliably solid image quality.

The Canon EOS R10 camers sitting on a wooden bannister

The Canon EOS R10 has been popular with beginners. (Image credit: Future)

Personally, I doubt the boat will be rocked much here. Were I a betting person, I’d say that we’d expect to see improvements in the subject-recognition autofocus, more sustained burst speeds with a deeper buffer (the original EOS R10 could shoot at 15fps, but not for very long), and perhaps a nudge-up of resolution from 24.2MP to 32.5MP, so as to better distinguish the EOS R10 from its cheaper siblings.

What do you make of Canon's rumored upcoming models? Have your say in the comments below.

Which DJI drone should I buy? Your simple guide to the different ranges and our top-rated flyers

25 July 2026 at 06:00

Fancy taking to the skies? DJI is the brand you're probably looking at β€” it's the name behind almost all the best drones around right now. If you're new to the world of drones, figuring out your options is tricky. This article is here to guide you through your options. I'll run through the main DJI ranges and who they're aimed at, and then once you've narrowed things down you can hop to the relevant section to read our reviews for each model. Let's get started...

Note: You'll only be able to see product cards for the models currently available to buy in your region. Due to FCC issues, not all DJI drones are available in the US. Hit the More details button to read our main takeaways for each model, and for a link to the full review.

DJI range guide

DJI Mini
DJI's flagship compact drones, and the best-selling range for beginner pilots. These are all sub-250g models, which means they come with little-to-no flight restrictions, depending on where you fly.
β€’ Check out the Mini lineup

DJI Air
A step up from the Mini series, aimed at enthusiasts. These drones fall into the next weight category up, which means they're sturdier and you'll be able to fly for longer, but you'll need your region's equivalent of a certificate of competency before you fly.
β€’ Check out the DJI Air lineup

DJI Mavic
Top-tier consumer drones with industry-leading camera performance. These are another step up from the DJI Air range, and again you'll need a certificate of competency before you fly.
β€’ Check out the DJI Mavic lineup

DJI Neo
The cheapest, smallest, lightest and simplest DJI drone. It comes with single-push take-off from your hand, designed for aerial selfies (this kind of drone is sometimes referred to as a selfie drone).
β€’ Check out the DJI Neo lineup

DJI Avata
FPV (first person view) drones, designed to be used with goggles for immersive high-speed and responsive flight β€” legally you need a 'spotter' with you when flying drones through goggles.
β€’ Check out the DJI Avata lineup

There are a few standalone options to be aware of. The Lito is a straightforward beginner drone at an extremely wallet-friendly price β€” it's a step down from the Mini range in both price and capabilities. The DJI Flip is another beginner drone with vlogger-friendly features. At the other end of the scale is the DJI Inspire range, aimed at professionals β€” the kind of thing that might be hired for productions.

DJI Mini drones

Mini 5 Pro Drone - One Colour

DJI
Mini 5 Pro

Pros

  • New 1-inch sensor with detail rich 4K HDR video
  • Versatile camera with a 225 degree roll rotation
  • Class-leading flight and safety features

Cons

  • Actual take-off weight could result in being the next class of drone, hit with restrictions
  • Flight times typically not as long as advertised
  • Pricier than entry-level models like the Mini 4K

Dji Mini 4k, Drone With 4k Uhd Camera for Adults, Under 249 G, 3-Axis Gimbal Stabilization, 10km Video Transmission, Auto Return, Wind Resistance, 1 Battery for 31-Min Max Flight Time

DJI
Mini 4K

Pros

  • Excellent value
  • 4K video quality beats rivals
  • Probably your best first drone

Cons

  • No object-collision sensors
  • Lacks subject tracking found in pricier models like the Mini 4 Pro

Dji Mini 4 Pro (dji Rc-N2), Folding Mini-Drone With 4k Hdr Video Camera for Adults, Under 0.549 Lbs/249 G, 34 Mins Flight Time, 20 Km Max Video Transmission Distance, Omnidirectional Vision Sensing

DJI
Mini 4 Pro

Pros

  • Improved video features
  • Omnidirectional Vision Sensing
  • Remains under 250g

Cons

  • Upgrades may not tempt Mini 3 Pro owners
  • Not suited to windy conditions
  • Fixed-aperture camera

Dji Mini 3 – Lightweight 3x Mechanical Gimbal Mini Camera Drone With 4k Hdr Video, 38-Min Flight Time, Up to 32800ft (10km) Video Transmission, True Vertical Shooting, Gps Auto Return Integrated

DJI
Mini 3

Pros

  • More affordable than the Mini 3 Pro
  • Great image quality
  • Small and lightweight

Cons

  • No collision avoidance
  • 4K video limited to 30fps
  • No subject tracking

DJI Mini 3 Pro drone

DJI
Mini 3 Pro

Pros

  • Impressive low-light performance
  • Useful obstacle avoidance
  • Handy automated flight modes

Cons

  • Pricier than previous Mini models

DJI Mini 2

DJI
Mini 2

Pros

  • Intuitive navigation
  • Compact, convenient drone
  • Great battery life

Cons

  • Pricier than predecessor
  • No new camera hardware
  • No follow mode

DJI Mavic drones

DJI Mavic 4 Pro

DJI
Mavic 4 Pro

Pros

  • Excellent price
  • Feature-packed
  • Impressive cameras

Cons

  • Weight just exceeds 2.2lbs / 1kg
  • More features than many people will need
  • Subject tracking is not as varied as the DJI Flip or Neo

DJI Mavic 3 drone

DJI
Mavic 3

Pros

  • Four Thirds camera is excellent
  • Useful adjustable aperture
  • Improved safety features
  • Telephoto lens a handy backup

Cons

  • Pricier than Mavic 2 series
  • Basic controller lacks info screen
  • European classification issues

DJI Mavic 3 Pro

DJI
Mavic 3 Pro

Pros

  • Three useful cameras
  • Excellent image quality
  • Solid safety features

Cons

  • C2 European rating
  • Not everyone will need three cameras
  • Slightly reduced flight times

DJI Mavic 3 Classic with controller on white background

DJI
Mavic 3 Classic

Pros

  • Less expensive than other Mavic 3 models
  • Excellent image quality
  • Impressive safety features

Cons

  • Remains expensive despite lower cost
  • Battery life shorter than claimed
  • No Apple ProRes video capture

DJI Air drones

DJI Air 3 drone on white background

DJI
Air 3

Pros

  • Dual cameras
  • Excellent wind resistance
  • Generous 46-minute flight time
  • Already excellent safety features improved further

Cons

  • C1 European rating
  • Fixed aperture is bad news for ND filter users
  • Large protruding camera likely to suffer in case of accidents

DJI Air 3S drone on a white background

DJI
Air 3S

Pros

  • Superb battery life
  • Easy and safe to fly
  • Great all-round camera performance

Cons

  • Weight-class restrictions apply
  • A minor upgrade on the original Air 3

DJI Air 2S

DJI
Air 2S

Pros

  • 1-inch 20 MP sensor
  • Great image quality
  • Small and lightweight

Cons

  • Controller isn’t foldable
  • Image edges slightly soft
  • No adjustable aperture

DJI Neo drones

Dji Neo 2 (drone Only)

DJI
Neo 2

Pros

  • Now has obstacle avoidance
  • Improved camera performance
  • More storage and faster transfer speed

Cons

  • Still only shoots JPEG photos
  • Limited battery life

DJI Neo on white background

DJI
Neo

Pros

  • Small and lightweight
  • Easy to use
  • Multiple flight control options

Cons

  • Only shoots photos in JPEG
  • 4K video fixed at 30fps
  • Expensive to add on goggles and FPV controller

DJI Avata drones

DJI Avata with controller and goggles on white background

DJI
Avata 360

Pros

  • Great 10-bit image quality from dual sensor setup
  • Choice of control methods
  • Agile, speedy and safe flyer
  • Good value for money

Cons

  • Other DJI drones beat it on image quality
  • Buying both FPV and standard controllers could push up the price
  • No manual FPV flight option

Avata 2 Drone - Black

DJI
Avata 2

Pros

  • Long flight time
  • Incredible image quality with improved dynamic range
  • Easy to fly out of the box, and packed with safety features

Cons

  • Unappealing to experienced FPV pilots outside of the DJI ecosystem
  • Poor ergonomics of the DJI Controller 3 show no improvement over the DJI Controller 2
  • Awkward handling in manual mode, probably down to inadequate tuning

Outliers

Dji Lito X1, 4k Camera Drone for Beginners, Updated Version of Mini 3

DJI
Lito X1

Pros

  • Great video quality for the price, especially with Lito X1
  • Omnidirectional obstacle avoidance included
  • Better battery life than the Neo 2 and Flip

Cons

  • Camera doesn't rotate for 9:16 content
  • Soft digital zoom
  • No built-in storage on Lito 1 model

Dji Flip, Drone With 4k Uhd Camera for Adults, Under 249 G, 3-Axis Gimbal Stabilization, 13km Video Transmission, Palm Takeoff, Auto Return, 1 Battery for 31-Min Flight Time, Intelligent Flight

DJI
Flip

Pros

  • Multi-use functionality
  • Several flight-control options
  • Sub-250g folding design

Cons

  • Image quality is good but not great
  • Not as agile as the Mini 4 Pro
  • Not great in wind

DJI Inspire 3

DJI
Inspire 3

Pros

  • Excellent image quality
  • Smooth and precise flight
  • Interchangeable lenses

Cons

  • Expensive
  • Large and heavy
  • More complicated than consumer models
DJI
FPV

Pros

  • A huge amount of fun to fly
  • Easy to fly for an FPV drone
  • Goggles offer great image quality
  • Solid transmission

Cons

  • Front props visible in footage
  • Stills photography severely limited
  • 'Spotter' needed when flying outdoors

❌