Editor’s Note: Astrobites is a graduate-student-run organization that digests astrophysical literature for undergraduate students. As part of the partnership between the AAS and astrobites, we occasionally repost astrobites content here at AAS Nova. We hope you enjoy this post from astrobites; the original can be viewed at astrobites.org.

Title: Unbreaking the Universe: MINERVA Measurements of Color Gradients in Massive Quiescent Galaxies Can Help Ease Too-Early Star Formation Tensions
Authors: Sam E. Cutler et al.
First Author’s Institution: Tufts University
Status: Published in ApJL

Universe Breakers

JWST launched in 2021, and one of its key goals was to observe the first galaxies as they formed. Early results from JWST found something surprising: extremely massive galaxies in the early universe that had “quenched,” or stopped making new stars, much faster than was expected. These early results led some to believe that our understanding of how quickly massive galaxies can form and quench was fundamentally wrong.

Before concluding that our understanding of the universe is broken, it’s important to find other reasons why we might see very massive galaxies in the early universe. One theory is that these galaxies are actually less massive than we think. To “weigh” a galaxy, astronomers first measure the amount of light being emitted by that galaxy. If all the light in a galaxy comes from stars (which should be true in the early universe, though active black holes can contribute a lot of light in some galaxies), you can infer the total number of stars by accounting for the average amount of light emitted per star of a certain mass; this is called the “mass-to-light ratio.” Since massive stars emit a lot more light than low-mass stars, and high-mass stars die out faster than low-mass stars, the mass-to-light ratio is higher for older stellar populations. To accurately “weigh” a galaxy, scientists therefore need both a good measurement of the total amount of light in the galaxy and how old its stellar population is. The authors of today’s article suggest that the uncertainty in these measurements might be leading to overestimates of galaxy masses and underestimates of galaxy star formation rates, possibly explaining the existence of the earliest massive quiescent (non-star-forming) galaxies.

The Impact of Color Gradients

Previous works about the massive quiescent galaxies in this study used spectroscopy to determine the galaxies’ masses and star formation rates. These spectra were taken with a “slit,” which introduces a source of error: if the slit is smaller than the image of the galaxy, some of the galaxy’s light will be missed in the spectrum. Astronomers usually correct for this by checking how much of the total light of a galaxy image is covered by the slit and scaling up the spectrum to account for the missing light, but this correction assumes that the spectrum is basically the same across the entire galaxy.

However, this assumption is rarely correct. In the local universe, star-forming spiral galaxies like the Milky Way tend to be made of a central “bulge” surrounded by a “disk” (see Figure 1). The bulge is no longer actively forming new stars, leading to a red-to-blue color gradient as you move out from the center of the galaxy. In astronomy, this is considered a “negative” color gradient. A slit that only covers the galaxy center would lead to an overall overestimate of the stellar mass and underestimate of the star formation rate. If the galaxies instead had a positive color gradient, with more star formation in the center of the galaxy, the mass would be underestimated and the star formation rate would be overestimated. Galaxies with both positive and negative color gradients have been found in the distant universe. By measuring the color gradient for each individual galaxy in their sample, the authors can correct the mass and star formation rate calculations from spectra taken with a slit spectrograph.

Figure 1: The spiral galaxy NGC 2683 with its bulge and disk labeled. The inner part of the galaxy (“bulge”) contains older, redder stars; the outer part of the galaxy (“disk”) contains bright blue stars that indicate that star formation is ongoing. Here, the slit spectrograph only covers the galaxy’s bulge, leading to incorrect mass and star formation rate measurements. [ESA/Hubble & NASA (CC BY 4.0) with annotations by Margaret Verrico]

Results

Instead of using spectra, the authors of today’s article use imaging in different filters to measure color gradients for a sample of four galaxies in the early universe that had previously been found to be extremely massive and no longer forming stars. They use medium-band filters, or filters that let in only a small part of a galaxy’s spectrum, to produce a spectral energy distribution at each radius. This spectral energy distribution is less informative than a spectrum (think a handprint versus a fingerprint), but it’s detailed enough to model the likely stellar population at each radius to determine whether the galaxies have positive, negative, or no color gradients, allowing for better corrections to the properties measured from the galaxies’ centers. They also model the stellar population from the central part of the galaxy that would normally be covered by a slit, as well as from the actual spectrum, to test whether any differences in their results come from their choice of modeling techniques.

The authors find that three of the four galaxies have a negative color gradient in at least some areas. The fourth galaxy has a relatively flat color gradient, though this measurement is less certain due to the object’s redshift. When the authors plot the galaxies’ colors on a diagnostic diagram that separates red and old galaxies from young and blue galaxies, they find that three of the four galaxies have centers that appear red and old but outskirts that appear young and blue (Figure 2). This means previous measurements of the mass may have been overestimated, and previous measurements of the star formation rate may have been underestimated.

Figure 2: The location of each of the four galaxies on a color–color diagram that separates red galaxies (above/to the left of the dashed lines) from blue galaxies (below/to the right of the dashed lines). The open markers indicate the galaxy color as measured from the center of the galaxy; the filled-in markers show the color at different radii from the galaxy center. For all but one galaxy, the color at several radii is bluer than at the center, indicating that the galaxy might have younger stars at least at some radii. [Adapted from Cutler et al. 2026]

Is the Universe Broken?

To determine whether these galaxies still count as “universe breakers,” the authors use a cosmological model to predict the largest expected galaxy mass in the observed area at different periods in cosmic time. The previous results had less than a 0.3% chance of occurring under current cosmological models; with their updated numbers and stellar population models, the authors find that the observed galaxies sometimes have more than a 5% chance of occurring, though there is still tension. They point out that their analysis ignores processes that could help galaxies grow and quench in the early universe, like galaxy mergers; still, the existence of these massive galaxies with such low star formation rates remains a puzzle.

Original astrobite edited by Ansh Gupta.

About the author, Margaret Verrico:

I am a fourth-year graduate student at the University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign. I study the connection between supermassive black hole transients and their host galaxies. I am also an avid knitter and reader, and I am passionate about opening up STEM opportunities for people of all backgrounds.

The post Galaxies of Many Colors appeared first on AAS Nova.

Editor’s Note: Astrobites is a graduate-student-run organization that digests astrophysical literature for undergraduate students. As part of the partnership between the AAS and astrobites, we occasionally repost astrobites content here at AAS Nova. We hope you enjoy this post from astrobites; the original can be viewed at astrobites.org.

Title: The JWST EXCELS Survey: Insights into the Nature of Quenching at Cosmic Noon
Authors: Maya Skarbinski et al.
First Author’s Institution: Johns Hopkins University
Status: Published in ApJ

How to Quench a Galaxy

Look at an image of the sky taken with a sufficiently sensitive telescope, and you’ll quickly notice that galaxies tend to cluster into two main types: blue spiral galaxies, which have flat disk shapes with a central bulge, and red elliptical galaxies, which look like spherical or elliptical balls of red stars. Blue spiral galaxies can form tens to hundreds of stars every year, while elliptical galaxies have completely stopped forming stars, meaning that some process has to transform star-forming spirals into non-star-forming, or “quiescent,” elliptical galaxies. To form the current population of massive elliptical galaxies, this process had to be common about 2–3 billion years after the Big Bang at “cosmic noon,” the period when star formation in the universe peaked. The processes that “quench” star formation in massive galaxies are still being studied, and one of the best ways to study them is to find galaxies that recently quenched and look for clues about the processes that quenched them.

Post-starburst galaxies are galaxies that have rapidly quenched after a short burst of star formation. Because these galaxies quenched so quickly and so recently, it’s often possible to find signs of whatever quenched them, like the signatures of past galaxy mergers, feedback from supermassive black hole accretion, or the shutoff of gas flowing into the galaxy. Rapid quenching is pretty uncommon now, but it was a much more common way for galaxies to quench at cosmic noon. Understanding post-starburst galaxies at cosmic noon is therefore critical for understanding the formation of massive elliptical galaxies in the local universe.

The Quest for Quenched Galaxies

Today’s article uses data from the JWST Early eXtragalactic Continuum and Emission Line Survey (EXCELS) to identify post-starburst galaxies at cosmic noon and try to determine why they quenched. EXCELS is a spectroscopic survey, so the authors get a spectrum for every galaxy. The spectrum encodes information about the galaxy’s stellar population, including the mass of stars in the galaxy, the number of stars forming every year, and the history of star formation throughout the galaxy’s life.

The authors use a technique called principal component analysis to further divide the sample into young and old post-starbursts. Principal component analysis is a machine-learning technique that learns the most important features of a data set. This technique is used for “dimension reduction,” or reducing the number of data points needed to learn something about the object. A typical spectrum has hundreds or even thousands of data points, which means performing data analysis on a spectrum can be very computationally expensive. Principal component analysis takes these thousands of data points and learns broad patterns that correlate with each other. These patterns are called “supercolors” in the context of spectral data, and they encode things like the overall shape and color of the spectrum as well as the spectral shape around key features (see Figure 1 for a visualization). Since the overall shape, color, and emission/absorption line features of a spectrum come from the galaxy’s stellar population, this method can be used to identify galaxies with lots of star formation a billion years ago but very little star formation today — in other words, post-starburst galaxies.

Figure 1: An example of principal component analysis for sample star-forming (SF), quiescent (Qu), and post-starburst (PSB) galaxy spectra (left-hand side). Principal component analysis simplifies a many-dimensional data set (for example, spectra) into fewer dimensions. In this case, Super-Color 1 measures the overall color of the spectrum (shown on the left-hand side as the slope of the spectra, marked with red lines), while Super-Color 2 measures the shape of the spectrum around 4,000 angstroms (orange box). The authors use principal component analysis to identify post-starburst galaxies for further analysis (right-hand side). [Adapted from Skarbinski et al. 2026]

The authors apply principal component analysis to the galaxies in their sample and find that 11 of the galaxies in their sample are classified as post-starburst, 9 are quiescent, and 4 still have some star formation. To further analyze the stellar populations of the post-starbursts in their sample, the authors use a program called Bagpipes to fit the galaxies’ spectra. Bagpipes is a spectral energy distribution fitting software, which means that it takes the observed spectrum of a real galaxy and tries to match it to a library of different stellar spectra. By measuring the relative contribution of different kinds of stars (which all have different lifetimes), Bagpipes can compute the likely history of star formation in the galaxy (e.g., when the star formation rate peaked) as well as the present-day properties of the galaxy (things like the mass in stars versus dust and the current star formation rate). The authors use the galaxies’ star formation histories to try to find clues as to how they quenched.

How Quickly Do Post-Starbursts Quench?

First, the authors measure something called a “quenching timescale,” which they define as the length of time between when the galaxy’s star formation rate peaked and when it fell low enough that the galaxy was quenched. The quenching timescale depends on which process shut down star formation in the galaxy — feedback from black hole accretion or star formation should cause fast quenching, while galaxies that are starved of gas from the intergalactic medium should quench more slowly. The authors find that 15 of their galaxies quenched in under 500 million years, 6 took between 500 million and 1 billion years, and 3 took longer than 1 billion years to quench. The galaxies that had the highest peak star formation rates quenched the fastest, suggesting that feedback from star formation could have played a role in quenching these galaxies.

Figure 2: Possible evolutionary tracks in supercolor for two example galaxies as they quench. The galaxy in the top panel quenches quickly and has post-starburst supercolors for about a billion years, while the galaxy in the bottom panel quenches without ever going through the post-starburst phase. The authors use these tracks to determine how important the post-starburst phase is for quenching massive galaxies. [Skarbinski et al. 2026]

Next, the authors measure how important the post-starburst phase is to form massive quiescent galaxies. Not all galaxies that quench go through a post-starburst phase; some objects, especially those that quench slowly, will transition directly from star forming to quiescent. The authors use the star formation histories from their spectral energy distribution fits to predict how the galaxies’ supercolors changed after their star formation peaked (Figure 2) and find that six of the nine quiescent galaxies went through a post-starburst phase in the past, while the other three did not. For the objects that went through a post-starburst phase, the median time spent as a post-starburst was around 600 million years.The authors can use this measured “visibility timescale” to constrain whether the post-starburst phase is important for forming massive quiescent galaxies. If the fraction of post-starburst galaxies in a sample is high, that can be for two reasons: either a larger fraction of galaxies will eventually go through a post-starburst phase, or the post-starburst phase is very long, making it easy to find post-starburst galaxies. Using the measured timescale of 600 million years and combining with results from another article, the authors find that 40% of quiescent galaxies likely went through a post-starburst phase; for the more massive end of the sample, this fraction increases to around 73% due to the shorter visibility timescale. This suggests that the post-starburst phase is very important for forming the kind of massive quiescent galaxies we see in the local universe.

While the post-starburst phase is important, the different quenching timescales present across the sample suggest that multiple pathways existed to quench galaxies at cosmic noon, similar to what has been found in less-distant galaxies and at cosmic noon in other samples. This is also supported by the fact that four of the five galaxies with sufficient data show evidence of an actively accreting supermassive black hole that may help shut down star formation in many (but perhaps not all) massive galaxies. While the precise processes that quench massive galaxies are still uncertain, one thing is clear: JWST EXCELS at solving the mystery!

Original astrobite edited by Anavi Uppal.

About the author, Margaret Verrico:

I am a fourth-year graduate student at the University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign. I study the connection between supermassive black hole transients and their host galaxies. I am also an avid knitter and reader, and I am passionate about opening up STEM opportunities for people of all backgrounds.

The post EXCELlent Work, Detectives! Solving the Murder of Star Formation in Galaxies with JWST appeared first on AAS Nova.

Editor’s Note: Astrobites is a graduate-student-run organization that digests astrophysical literature for undergraduate students. As part of the partnership between the AAS and astrobites, we occasionally repost astrobites content here at AAS Nova. We hope you enjoy this post from astrobites; the original can be viewed at astrobites.org.

Title: MAGAZ3NE: Confirming Dust Deficiency and Quiescent Nature of Ultramassive Galaxies at 3 < z < 4 with ALMA Observations
Authors: Wenjun Chang et al.
First Author’s Institution: University of California, Riverside
Status: Published in ApJ

Distant galaxies offer a unique window into how stars, gas, and dust evolve over cosmic time. Tracing this evolution requires understanding not only how galaxies form, but also how and when they stop forming stars, a process known as quenching. Understanding how, when, and why galaxies quench is a fundamental question in astrophysics, and one that requires observations of star-forming, quenching, and fully quenched galaxies alike. Unfortunately, one complication is that identifying truly quenched galaxies is challenging: galaxies that appear “dead” may instead be actively forming stars, hidden behind a thick veil of dust.

In today’s article, the authors use observations from the Atacama Large Millimetre/submillimetre Array (ALMA) to investigate five ultramassive galaxies at redshifts, z, between 3 and 4, and ask a deceptively simple question: are these massive red galaxies genuinely quenched, or are they secretly forming stars behind the scenes?

Meet the Suspects: Ultramassive Galaxies at the Edge of Cosmic Noon

The five galaxies in this study are drawn from the Massive Ancient Galaxies at z > 3 NEar-infrared (MAGAZ3NE) survey, which targets some of the most massive galaxies known at early cosmic times. All five have stellar masses exceeding 100 billion solar masses and have been confirmed at z > 3. At these redshifts, we are observing the galaxies as they were when the universe was less than 2 billion years old. This is just before an epoch known as cosmic noon, when star formation across the universe reached its peak.

These galaxies also benefit from extensive multiwavelength observations from a range of observatories, including the ground-based Visible and Infrared Survey Telescope for Astronomy and the Spitzer Space Telescope. By combining imaging across wavelengths from the ultraviolet to the near-infrared, astronomers can measure the “colours” of galaxies and use these colours to infer the galaxies’ star-forming activity.

Galaxies that have quenched their star formation are dominated by older stellar populations, which makes them appear red (hence why they are often referred to as “red and dead” galaxies). However, dust can redden galaxies in a similar way by absorbing blue light and re-emitting it at longer wavelengths — meaning that a dusty, star-forming galaxy can easily masquerade as a quenched one. To uncover any hidden star formation, the authors turn to ALMA to search for far-infrared dust emission. The sample of galaxies investigated with ALMA is shown in Figure 1.

Figure 1: UVJ colour–colour diagram, which uses galaxy colours in the ultraviolet (U), visible (V), and near-infrared (J) to identify quenched galaxies. The five ultramassive galaxies (UMGs) studied here (filled cyan circles) lie firmly in the quenched region (QG), consistent with a lack of ongoing star formation. Crosses indicate galaxies undetected in ALMA dust emission, while other massive galaxies at similar redshifts are shown in grey for comparison. [Chang et al. 2026]

ALMA on the Scene

ALMA observes light at sub-millimetre wavelengths, which at these redshifts traces emission from star-forming regions that are obscured by dust. Of the five ultramassive galaxies in this sample, only one is detected with ALMA. Even when the remaining four galaxies are stacked together, no dust emission is recovered, indicating that if any dust is present, it must be extremely faint.

To better quantify what these ALMA non-detections imply, the authors perform spectral energy distribution fitting (see a recent overview bite on spectral energy distribution fitting) using the Code Investigating GALaxy Emission, or CIGALE, a code that enforces energy balance between absorbed starlight and dust emission to estimate physical properties such as a galaxy’s star formation rate and dust content. With the ALMA constraints included, all five galaxies are found to lie more than 10 times below the star-forming main sequence. Even the single ALMA-detected galaxy remains formally quenched, showing only weak residual star formation.

In other words, these galaxies really are dead (or at least extremely dormant).

Extremely Dust-Poor Galaxies

The spectral energy distribution fitting also allows the authors to measure how much dust these galaxies contain relative to their stellar mass. This ratio provides a simple but powerful way to assess how much interstellar material remains in a galaxy — and therefore how much fuel is left for future star formation.

Three of the five ultramassive galaxies have ratios of M_dust/M_star < 10^-4 (Figure 2), placing them among the most dust-poor quenched galaxies confirmed at z > 3. The lone galaxy detected by ALMA contains slightly more dust, with M_dust/M_star = 10^-3, but even this is far below what would be expected for an actively star-forming galaxy. For comparison, typical star-forming galaxies at similar stellar masses host more than 100 times more dust.

Figure 2: The ratio of dust mass to stellar mass versus redshift for massive quenched galaxies (QGs). This quantity measures how dust rich a galaxy is compared to its stellar mass. The ultramassive galaxies in this study (cyan pentagons) fall well below the dust content expected for star-forming galaxies (solid blue line), highlighting their extreme dust deficiency. [Adapted from Chang et al. 2026]

For now, ALMA has delivered a clear answer to the question of “dead or in disguise?”: at least some candidate ultramassive galaxies in the early universe really are quenched, and they are strikingly dust poor. By ruling out the dusty impostor scenario, this study shows that deep ALMA observations can cleanly distinguish genuinely quenched galaxies from dusty star-forming ones, even at the highest stellar masses and earliest cosmic times. How these galaxies lost their dust remains an open question, but one thing is clear: by the time cosmic noon arrived, some galaxies had already finished forming stars and quietly faded into dormancy.

Original astrobite edited by Viviana Cáceres.

About the author, Lucie Rowland:

I’m a fourth (and final!) year PhD student at Leiden Observatory in the Netherlands, studying massive, star forming galaxies in the early universe with ALMA and JWST. It’s a really exciting time to be interested in astronomy, so I hope to make groundbreaking new research more accessible!

The post Distant Galaxies: Dead or in Disguise? appeared first on AAS Nova.

How do massive galaxies form and evolve? A recent study traces the stellar and dust distributions across evolutionary phases of massive galaxies to better understand how massive dusty star-forming galaxies fit into the picture.

Dusty Massive Galaxies

Massive galaxies, like the Milky Way or even larger, undergo phases of active star formation and quiescent phases of inactivity, but exactly how these galaxies evolve through these stages is not yet fully understood. Dusty star-forming galaxies, which are undergoing a period of intense star formation and shrouded in dust, might be the missing evolutionary step between star-forming and quiescent phases of massive galaxy evolution. 

Currently, the leading explanation for massive galaxy formation and evolution is inside-out growth — star formation and quenching start in the inner regions of a galaxy and progress outward. However, it’s not clear whether dusty star-forming galaxies also follow the favored inside-out pathway, or if they instead proceed outside-in, first growing their disks and then assembling a central bulge.

Example of JWST NIRCam images with ALMA contour lines overlaid for select dusty star-forming galaxies in the sample. [Modified from Bodansky et al 2026]

Multiwavelength Morphological Comparisons

To directly compare the star and dust morphologies across massive galaxies, Sarah Bodansky (University of Massachusetts, Amherst) and collaborators selected a sample of 33 dusty star-forming galaxies from the GOODS-ALMA 2.0 survey that searched the sky for 1.1-mm dust emission as well as star-forming and quiescent comparison samples drawn from JWST observations. Combining the ALMA survey data with JWST imaging, the authors studied the rest-frame optical (stars) and rest-frame near-infrared (dust) morphologies of dusty, star-forming, and quiescent galaxies at redshifts around cosmic noon (a few billion years after the Big Bang).

When comparing optical morphologies, the authors found that dusty star-forming galaxies and typical star-forming galaxies had similar distributions, but their near-infrared morphologies showed clear differences. Dusty galaxies tended to show more compact near-infrared emission, with dust tracing their stellar populations and more concentrated in the galaxies’ central regions. Though clearly different from star-forming galaxies, the authors noted striking similarities between the near-infrared morphologies of the dusty star-forming and quiescent galaxies, especially within their centers.

Average surface brightness profiles for the rest-optical (left) and rest-near-infrared (right) for the dusty (black), star-forming (blue), and quiescent (red) galaxies. In the near-infrared, the dusty star-forming galaxy profile appears very similar to the quiescent galaxy profile. [Bodansky et al 2026]

Citation

“JWST+ALMA Reveal the Buildup of Stellar Mass in the Cores of Dusty Star-forming Galaxies at Cosmic Noon,” Sarah Bodansky et al 2026 ApJ 1001 235. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ae4f64

The post Hints for Massive Galaxy Evolution from Dusty Star-Forming Galaxies appeared first on AAS Nova.

How does environment shape a galaxy’s growth and evolution? This is the question explored in a recent study led by Gissel Montaguth (University of São Paulo). Montaguth’s team examined nearly 4,000 galaxies in low-mass, high-mass, and compact galaxy groups, as well as galaxies adrift in the field without belonging to a group. The sampled galaxies were classified as early-type, late-type, transition (generally disk galaxies with quenched star formation), or other (generally elliptical but with lingering star formation). The image above shows six transition galaxies from the sample, three of which show signs of past disturbances (top row). The team found that early-type and “other” galaxies were resilient to changes in environment, but late-type and transition galaxies could be affected by life in close groups. Late-type galaxies in compact groups tended to be somewhat smaller than their loosely grouped or field galaxy counterparts, while transition galaxies showed a significantly steeper stellar mass–size relation in group environments and smaller sizes in groups than in the field. This suggests that transition galaxies are strongly influenced by interactions, mergers, and processes like disk truncation. To learn more about the impact of environment on galaxy properties, be sure to check out the full article linked below.

Citation

“Galaxies Caught in Transition: The Role of Group Environment in Shaping the Mass–Size Relation in the Local Universe,” Gissel P. Montaguth et al 2026 ApJ 999 160. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ae42ca

The post Featured Image: Galaxies Caught in Transition appeared first on AAS Nova.

Galaxies pull in and pump out gas as they form and evolve, but distinguishing between the two directions is tricky. A recent study used emission lines and dust absorption to try to pin it down.

Inflow or Outflow?

Throughout their lives, galaxies churn gas into stars, stars fuse new metals, supernovae blow enriched material back out, and the cycle repeats. To maintain this process and sustain star formation, a galaxy must fuel up by accreting gas from its surroundings. However, catching galactic gas accretion has proven difficult — both emission from gas falling into the galaxy (inflows) and gas blown out by supernovae (outflows) can appear blueshifted or redshifted along an observer’s sight line, depending on if the flowing material is in front of or behind the galaxy.

While direct evidence of inflows has been identified in the Milky Way, only a few direct detections of inflowing gas in other galaxies exist due to the degeneracy of inflow and outflow emission-line features. Relying on additional absorption measurements, some studies have teased out inflows in other galaxies, but these star formation fuel pumps remain overwhelmingly evasive. The angle at which we observe a galaxy also limits our ability to detect both inflows and outflows, with face-on galaxies best oriented to detect these shifted spectral features. How then do we uncover this critical component of a galaxy’s evolution?

Breaking Through with the Balmer Decrement

A diagram illustrating the degeneracy in emission spectra of galaxies, with the top panel showing an inflowing component and the bottom panel showing an outflowing component. While the Hα emission is similar, the Hβ emission is more affected by extinction due to dust in the galaxy’s disk, making it possible to identify inflow versus outflow based on the Balmer decrement. Click to enlarge. [Sitaram et al 2026]

Testing this idea, the authors performed a hydrodynamic simulation of an isolated, face-on Milky Way–like galaxy and tracked inflows and outflows over a billion years. From the simulation, they extracted mock spectral observations to measure the ionized gas motions and Hα and Hꞵ emission lines along different sight lines throughout the galaxy. Separating gas components into three categories — inflow, outflow, and in the disk — the authors found that dust extinction does cause noticeable differences in the Balmer decrement depending on a component’s location with respect to the disk.

The distribution of Balmer ratios between different components in the interstellar medium and in front of the galaxy (left) and behind the galaxy (right). Material in front of the galaxy shows lower Hα/Hβ ratios. Click to enlarge. [Sitaram et al 2026]

Front Inflow Finds

What does this mean for identifying the inflows that provide galaxies with star-forming fuel? The authors reported that components in front of the galaxy — redshifted inflows and blueshifted outflows — tend to exhibit lower Hα/Hꞵ ratios compared to components behind the disk, aligning with the expectation that dust in the disk absorbs Hꞵ. In particular, these front inflows appear to be the most readily distinguished from gas in and behind the galaxy’s disk.

However, things get more complicated for gas behind the galaxy. Because the dust in the simulation is distributed nonuniformly in small clumps throughout the galaxy, it is difficult to distinguish between disk gas and gas behind the galaxy. While future simulations with improved dust modeling are necessary to resolve this issue, this study offers a useful method to distinguish inflow and outflow in dusty face-on galaxies.

Citation

“Identifying Signatures of Inflow onto Face-On Galaxies Using Balmer Decrement,” Meghna Sitaram et al 2026 ApJ 1001 87. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ae5222

The post In or Out? Using Balmer Emission to Distinguish Inflows from Outflows appeared first on AAS Nova.

Giant low-surface-brightness galaxies are rare and unusual members of the galactic menagerie. They host the largest galactic disks currently known, have baryonic masses of order 100 billion solar masses, and sport narrow, tightly wound spiral structures. The origins of these vast galaxies — they can be up to 10 times larger than the Milky Way — are unknown, though various theories involving mergers, accretion, and strange dark matter halos exist. Research also suggests that there may be a connection between these galaxies and compact ellipticals, which are small, dense, and contain old stars. In a recent article, a team led by Anna Saburova (Sternberg Astronomical Institute) investigated two giant low-surface-brightness galaxies with compact elliptical companions. In the image above, the colored circles represent the oxygen abundance at each location in AGC 192040 (left) and UGC 1382 (right). The red arrows point to the compact elliptical companions. Using the chemical abundance information to investigate possible formation mechanisms, Saburova and collaborators found that the two galaxies likely formed in different ways. UGC 1382 appears to be the result of multiple mergers, while AGC 192040 may have accreted gas from its halo or a galactic filament before undergoing a merger of its own. To learn more about this study of two rare galaxies, be sure to check out the full research article linked below!

Citation

“MUSE Study of Two Giant Low-Surface-Brightness Galaxies with Compact Satellites,” Anna S. Saburova et al 2026 ApJ 998 19. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ae3139

The post Featured Image: Rare Giant Galaxies appeared first on AAS Nova.

The expansive collection of galaxies pictured here is MACS J0416, a galaxy cluster located about 4.3 billion light-years away. (Click the image for the full view!) MACS J0416 is one of five clusters targeted by the Canadian NIRISS Unbiased Cluster Survey (CANUCS). This survey takes advantage of the spacetime-bending abilities of massive galaxy clusters and uses JWST’s Near-Infrared Imager and Slitless Spectrograph (NIRISS) and Near-Infrared Camera (NIRCam) to paint a detailed multi-wavelength portrait of galaxies in the early universe. Three of the CANUCS galaxy clusters, including MACS J0416, were investigated even more closely in the follow-up JWST in Technicolor program, which added precise spectroscopic redshifts and broadened the wavelength coverage of parallel fields of view. In a recent publication led by Ghassan Sarrouh (York University), the CANUCS team outlined the design of these programs and their data products, which enabled the study of roughly 53,000 galaxies within the galaxy cluster fields and an additional 44,000 galaxies in adjacent fields. To learn more about the CANUCS and JWST in Technicolor programs, be sure to check out the full research article linked below.

Citation

“CANUCS/Technicolor Data Release 1: Imaging, Photometry, Slit Spectroscopy, and Stellar Population Parameters,” Ghassan T. E. Sarrouh et al 2026 ApJS 282 3. doi:10.3847/1538-4365/ae1611

The post Featured Image: Galaxy Cluster in Technicolor appeared first on AAS Nova.

Editor’s Note: For the remainder of 2025, we’ll be looking at a few selections that we haven’t yet discussed on AAS Nova from among the most-downloaded articles published in AAS journals this year. The usual posting schedule will resume January 2nd.

The Bullseye: HST, Keck/KCWI, and Dragonfly Characterization of a Giant Nine-ringed Galaxy

Published February 2025

Main takeaway:

Red ellipses overplotted on the first eight rings identified with Hubble in the Bullseye galaxy. Click to enlarge. [Pasha et al 2025]

Why it’s interesting:

Galaxy mergers and interactions are commonplace in the universe, but it is very rare for a dwarf galaxy to strike right through a large galaxy’s core. When this does happen, the collision sends shock waves through the impaled galaxy, sweeping gas and dust outward and forming rings where star formation can occur (hence the name, collisional ring galaxy). These galaxies are valuable sites to explore galactic structure and evolution as well as provide a unique case to study galaxy mergers and interactions. Previously discovered collisional ring galaxies have at most two or three rings, so when Pasha and collaborators found the stunning nine in the Bullseye, it was clear they caught something significant.

Catching the Bullseye at a lucky time in its evolution:

Why does the Bullseye have so many rings? Theoretical studies of these head-on collisions predict that many rings will form and travel outward after the initial crash; however, the rings tend to dissolve after only a few hundred million years. Catching this collision only 50 million years after it happened means we are witnessing the earlier stages of the Bullseye’s evolution. This lucky discovery not only confirms theoretical predictions for collisional ring galaxies, it also may be a clue to how another unique galaxy type, giant low-surface brightness galaxies, originate. Given the wispy ring material found at very large radii from the Bullseye, the authors suggested that collisional ring galaxies may evolve into giant low-surface brightness galaxies as they expand outward and fade. Further investigation and a larger sample of collisional ring galaxies are necessary to confirm this hypothesis, but the Bullseye provides interesting and critical observational evidence of these predictions for the first time.

Citation

Imad Pasha et al 2025 ApJL 980 L3. doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ad9f5c

The post Selections from 2025: The Nine-Ringed Bullseye Galaxy appeared first on AAS Nova.

Emitting powerful radiation into their surroundings, quasars had the ability to significantly influence their local environments. A recent study using JWST observations focuses in on one of the most powerful known quasars to determine its intergalactic impact.

Quasar Questions

Beacons of light from the very distant universe, quasars are incredibly luminous galactic cores powered by active supermassive black holes. During the first few billion years after the Big Bang, quasars pumped radiation not only into their host galaxies but also out into intergalactic space and subsequently into nearby galaxies. This radiation was strong enough to ionize any intervening material and even break up (or photodissociate) molecular hydrogen gas. With their star formation fuel evaporated, a quasar’s unsuspecting galactic neighbors were stymied from growth.

Sky map showing the location of quasar J0100+2802 (marked with black cross) and the [OIII]-emitting galaxies detected in the field. The red points are within the same redshift window as J0100+2802, and the green and orange points show foreground and background galaxies respectively. Click to enlarge. [Zhu et al 2025]

Searching for Suppressed Star Formation

To investigate how quasars may impact their environments, Yongda Zhu (University of Arizona) and collaborators set their gazes on J0100+2802 — the most ultraviolet-luminous quasar known at redshift z > 6. This powerful quasar lies in an overdensity, surrounded by galaxies filled with hot, young stars, making it an ideal candidate to test the impacts of luminous quasars on their neighbors. The authors used spectroscopy and photometry obtained from JWST to explore the space around J0100+2802.

Searching within the expected reach of the quasar’s radiation field, the authors identified galaxies with doubly ionized oxygen emission ([OIII] λ5008), which traces a galaxy’s recent star formation activity. After carefully separating background and foreground galaxies from galaxies at the same redshift as J0100+2802, the authors measured the total [OIII] emission and compared it to the overall ultraviolet stellar emission. From their sample, galaxies closer to J0100+2802 tend to exhibit lower [OIII]/UV ratios than those farther away, indicating that the powerful quasar may be suppressing star formation activity in nearby galaxies. 

[OIII]/UV ratio versus distance from quasar J0100+2802. There is a clear positive correlation indicating that closer to the powerful quasar, [OIII] emission declines. The dashed line shows the expected radiation field of J0100+2802. Click to enlarge. [Modified from Zhu et al 2025]

Confirming the Culprit

To verify that the quasar is truly responsible for this declining trend, other environmental factors and intrinsic galaxy properties must be ruled out. Could the galaxies nearby J0100+2802 just happen to have elevated ultraviolet stellar continuum? Or could the overdense environment itself drive this trend? The authors performed additional analysis to control for these variables and found no strong global factors that could explain the decline in [OIII] emission — radiation from the quasar is likely the driver.

To further bolster their results and determine whether this behavior is more widespread, the authors investigated the environments around three other quasars at the same redshift as J0100+2802. Though these quasars are not as powerful as J0100+2802, a similar trend is uncovered for galaxies within the radiation field of these quasars. From this study, radiative feedback from quasars appears to disrupt the star formation activity in nearby galaxies, suppressing their growth and changing the way early galaxy formation progresses. 

Further wide-field studies are necessary to understand the full extent to which reionization-era quasars can impact their environments, but this study provides a clear path forward with JWST.

Citation

“Quasar Radiative Feedback May Suppress Growth on Intergalactic Scales at z = 6.3,” Yongda Zhu et al 2025 ApJL 995 L5. doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ae1f8e

The post Intergalactic Impacts of Quasars During the Epoch of Reionization appeared first on AAS Nova.