❌

Normal view

RTX 5060 Ti survives car crash after being bent in half β€” short PCB saves the day, single memory chip resolder restore full performance

Buying a new GPU is always a joyous occasion, but the celebration was cut short for an unfortunate customer in China. Right after buying an AX Gaming RTX 5060 Ti, they got into a serious car crash that ended up totaling the car β€” and the card along with it. Fortunately, the driver was safe, and somehow the GPU survived, too, with no major electronic damage. Despite being bent in half, the card ended up only requiring minor repair work and was brought back to life quickly by Brother Zhang.

Visually, the card didn't look salvageable, and midrange GPUs like these often don't make for feasible repair jobs either because of the high labor cost. The backplate and cooler were completely destroyed, so Brother Zhang separated them from the actual PCB. Luckily, this variant of the 5060 Ti used a very short PCB that just barely touched the point of curvature, so the internals were mostly fine.

The technician checked all the power rails for a short circuit but saw no abnormal resistance, which confirmed the core and memory weren't dead. He then proceeded to quickly test the GPU with its bare PCB, and it booted successfully. Brother Zhang devised a makeshift cooler that consisted of the bent fin stack straightened back to the best of his abilities, and two 120mm fans strapped on top via zip ties. This seemed enough to keep the card cool.

Repairing a bent RTX 5060 Ti that was in a car crash
Brother Zhang on YouTube
Repairing a bent RTX 5060 Ti that was in a car crash
Brother Zhang on YouTube

However, as soon as he tried to install drivers, the PC would black screen and hard crash, showing consistent signs of instability. At this point, Brother Zhang reopened the card and inspected the PCB. He inspected the flex point and decided to resolder the memory module closest to the edge of the board since it experienced the most torque. A simple removal and reapplication fixed the issue, and the card was detected correctly as a 5060 Ti with the full 8GB of VRAM.

Repairing a bent RTX 5060 Ti that was in a car crash

(Image credit: Brother Zhang on YouTube)

Brother Zhang rechecked for any short circuits to ensure no solder bridges were created during the BGA work before moving on to benchmarking. In Furmark, the temps peaked and stabilized at 64Β°C with no visual artifacts. He then ran a full 3DMark loop to test the PCIe 5.0 x8 link speeds β€” the card passed with a high 98.9% stability score. It drew around 92% of its maximum power limit during the run, with core temps peaking at around 67Β°C. This 5060 Ti was officially a survivor.

AMD's new Radeon RX 9050 is roughly 30% slower than the RTX 5050 in games, early testing shows β€” the cheapest 8GB RDNA 4 GPU comfortably handles 1080p gaming but doesn't impress

AMD officially launched its cheapest RDNA 4 graphics card, the Radeon RX 9050, a few days ago, and we already have some performance numbers for it. Preliminary testing from Japanese outlet GDM puts the GPU up against its closest Nvidia rival, the RTX 5050, in a matchup that sees the AMD offering lose by a big margin. The RX 9050 is fine on its own, especially if you're limited to 1080p gaming, but in the head-to-head it leaves a lot to be desired based on its roughly 30% slower framerates averaged across various titles.

The test bench consisted of a Ryzen 7 9800X3D and specifically the ASRock Challenger variant of the 9050, alongside the Gigabyte Windforce OC variant of the RTX 5050. Starting with synthetic benchmarks, the Red Team's GPU is almost 20% slower in the 3DMark suite. The biggest difference lies in Port Royal, where the RTX 5050 scores 6,181 points but the RX 9050 only manages 4,531 points. Time Spy sees the smallest delta, where both cards are separated by about 500 points.

Early RX 9050 benchmarks

Benchmark Test

Type / Focus

AMD Radeon RX 9050

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050

RX 9050 Deficit

3DMark Time Spy

DX12 Rasterization (Overall)

9,441

10,571

-10.7%

3DMark Time Spy Extreme

DX12 4K Rasterization (Overall)

4,450

4,952

-10.1%

3DMark Steel Nomad

Modern DX12 Non-RT

1,985

2,282

-13.0%

3DMark Speed Way

DX12 Ultimate (Ray Tracing)

1,873

2,520

-25.7%

3DMark Port Royal

Ray Tracing Benchmark

4,531

6,181

-26.7%

Moving onto gaming, the testing was conducted across multiple resolutions, so we've chosen to show the most representative results possible. When talking about esports titles such as Apex Legends and Rainbow Six Siege, the RX 9050 holds its ground well, especially as you scale up the resolution. At 4K Ultra+ settings, both GPUs actually match at 64 FPS. The biggest difference was 20%, reported at 1440p medium, where the RTX 5050 pushed 150 FPS while the RX 9050 could only manage 125 FPS.

Game

Preset

Resolution

AMD Radeon RX 9050

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050

Winner / Gap

Apex Legends

Max Settings

1080p

147.1 FPS

192.4 FPS

RTX 5050 (+30.8%)

Apex Legends

Max Settings

1440p

101.4 FPS

128.2 FPS

RTX 5050 (+26.4%)

Apex Legends

Max Settings

4K

72.6 FPS

74.8 FPS

RTX 5050 (+3.0%)

Rainbow Six Siege X

Medium

1080p

204.0 FPS

239.0 FPS

RTX 5050 (+17.2%)

Rainbow Six Siege X

Medium

1440p

125.0 FPS

150.0 FPS

RTX 5050 (+20.0%)

Rainbow Six Siege X

Medium

4K

65.0 FPS

73.0 FPS

RTX 5050 (+12.3%)

Rainbow Six Siege X

Ultra+

1080p

129.0 FPS

141.0 FPS

RTX 5050 (+9.3%)

Rainbow Six Siege X

Ultra+

1440p

116.0 FPS

126.0 FPS

RTX 5050 (+8.6%)

Rainbow Six Siege X

Ultra+

4K

64.0 FPS

64.0 FPS

Tied

The rest of the games show a more underwhelming result for the RX 9050, with DOOM: The Dark Ages acting as an outlier where both GPUs take turns destroying the other. The game has multi-frame gen support at up to 6x for the Nvidia card, while the FSR frame gen is limited to just 2x. Regardless, the RX 9050 wins at higher resolutions in all settings due. As mentioned, however, this is the only test where the 9050 seemed to beat the 5050.

Game Title

Preset

Resolution

AMD Radeon RX 9050

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050

Winner / Gap

DOOM

Medium

1080p

132.74 FPS

296.63 FPS

RTX 5050 (+123.5%)

DOOM

Medium

1440p

85.11 FPS

17.17 FPS

RX 9050 (+395.7%)

DOOM

Medium

4K

39.71 FPS

9.87 FPS

RX 9050 (+302.3%)

DOOM

Ultra Nightmare

1080p

114.17 FPS

280.13 FPS

RTX 5050 (+145.4%)

DOOM

Ultra Nightmare

1440p

73.79 FPS

10.71 FPS

RX 9050 (+589.0%)

DOOM

Ultra Nightmare

4K

35.56 FPS

9.62 FPS

RX 9050 (+269.6%)

The remaining titles show rather boring numbers where the RX 9050 loses every single time, no matter the resolution or preset. It comes the closest in Final Fantasy XIV at 1080p, where the internal benchmark separates the two GPUs by 23%, whereas the biggest difference lies in Onimusha, where the RTX 5050 is almost twice as fast. Across these games, on average, the RX 9050 is 31% slower at 1080p, 34% slower at 1440p, and 42% slower at 4K.

Game Title

Preset

Resolution

AMD Radeon RX 9050

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050

Winner / Gap

Final Fantasy XIV: Dawntrail

Standard

1080p

12895 pts

15847 pts

RTX 5050 (+22.9%)

Final Fantasy XIV: Dawntrail

Standard

1440p

8136 pts

10059 pts

RTX 5050 (+23.6%)

Final Fantasy XIV: Dawntrail

Standard

4K

3994 pts

5102 pts

RTX 5050 (+27.7%)

Cyberpunk 2077

Medium

1080p

210.79 FPS

300.16 FPS

RTX 5050 (+42.4%)

Cyberpunk 2077

Medium

1440p

134.45 FPS

185.25 FPS

RTX 5050 (+37.8%)

Cyberpunk 2077

Medium

4K

64.27 FPS

107.47 FPS

RTX 5050 (+67.2%)

Cyberpunk 2077

Ultra

1080p

142.01 FPS

241.72 FPS

RTX 5050 (+70.2%)

Cyberpunk 2077

Ultra

1440p

87.51 FPS

147.39 FPS

RTX 5050 (+68.4%)

Cyberpunk 2077

Ultra

4K

40.42 FPS

77.19 FPS

RTX 5050 (+91.0%)

Onimusha: Way of the Sword

Medium

1080p

134.97 FPS

166.60 FPS

RTX 5050 (+23.4%)

Onimusha: Way of the Sword

Medium

1440p

103.40 FPS

143.15 FPS

RTX 5050 (+38.4%)

Onimusha: Way of the Sword

Medium

4K

62.09 FPS

103.55 FPS

RTX 5050 (+66.8%)

Onimusha: Way of the Sword

Ultra

1080p

110.07 FPS

149.66 FPS

RTX 5050 (+36.0%)

Onimusha: Way of the Sword

Ultra

1440p

86.43 FPS

128.51 FPS

RTX 5050 (+48.7%)

Onimusha: Way of the Sword

Ultra

4K

53.33 FPS

92.13 FPS

RTX 5050 (+72.8%)

The RX 9050 scores a win in power consumption, drawing about 8W less when idling and about 35W less under heavy load compared to the RTX 5050. The card seems to run cool and quiet, and can be manufactured to be rather small, making it ideal for SFF builds. Overall, it's an okay experience when it comes to gaming, performing amicably in a vacuum, but disappointing against competition. Thankfully, the 4GB variant of the RX 9050 seems to be limited to OEMs. As always, these are preliminary testing results from one outlet, so take them with the customary grain of salt.

Nvidia's fastest graphics cards get US price increase at Best Buy, Amazon β€” Astral RTX 5080 now costs more than 5090's MSRP, flagship card now commands more than $4,300

If you were hoping GPU prices would settle down anytime soon, you are in for disappointment. Nvidia’s RTX 5080 and RTX 5090 models from various OEM partners are once again selling well above their launch prices. As per a recent listing noticed by users on Reddit, the Asus ROG Astral RTX 5080 is now priced at $2,099.99 at Best Buy. That's $600 above its official launch MSRP of $1,499.99 and even $100 more than the flagship RTX 5090's launch MSRP of $1,999.

Similarly, pricing for the RTX 5090 has also skyrocketed in recent months. According to a Reddit post, the Asus ROG Astral RTX 5090 is currently listed at $4,329.99 on Amazon, roughly $1,530 above its launch MSRP of $2,799.99. Even the MSI Gaming Trio RTX 5090 has gone up to $4,299.95, a whopping $1,900 more than what it was when it debuted in early 2025.

That said, these hefty prices are primarily limited to premium partner models. Certain mainstream RTX 5080 cards can still be purchased closer to Nvidia's MSRP. For instance, Zotac's RTX 5080 Solid OC is selling for $1,249.99 on Amazon while PNY's RTX 5080 OC is listed at 1,256.99 at Best Buy.

While one cannot ascertain the exact reason behind this price increase, it does take us back to when tech YouTuber der8auer claimed that Nvidia has discontinued its Observed Pricing Program (OPP). This was essentially an incentive scheme that helped board partners to sell certain Nvidia products at or near MSRP. The termination of this program meant that manufacturers such as Asus, MSI, and Gigabyte gained no incentive to keep prices close to Nvidia's suggested retail price. As a result, premium custom cards have become even more expensive, with manufacturers passing higher production costs on to the consumers.

In addition to that, rising DRAM prices thanks to AI-driven demand have led to a massive increase in the cost of GDDR7 memory used in RTX 50-series cards. Nvidia was also said to be prioritizing production of higher-margin products, including the RTX 5080 and AI hardware, which has further tightened supply of certain gaming GPUs.

For potential customers, the latest listings suggest that waiting for premium RTX 50-series cards to return to MSRP may take longer than expected. While Founders Edition models remain the closest option to Nvidia's suggested pricing, they're often low in stock, forcing customers to choose between paying a hefty premium for high-end partner cards or settling for more affordable custom models.

❌