Find the right wearable for your lifestyle, workouts, and goals.

Find the right wearable for your lifestyle, workouts, and goals.

This image, captured by NASA’s James Webb Space Telescope and released on June 5, 2026, shows just a small portion of one of the Orion Molecular Clouds, a long and massive filament of cold gas and dust beyond the Orion Nebula. Every stage of star formation — from the youngest stellar embryos to protoplanetary discs to newly-minted pre-main sequence stars — is contained within this scene which stretches 150 light-years across.

Read more about this image.

Image credit: ESA/Webb, NASA & CSA, T. Megeath, M. Zamani (ESA/Webb); Acknowledgement: M. H. Özsaraç

The post Stages of Star Formation appeared first on NASA Science.

This image, captured by NASA’s James Webb Space Telescope and released on June 5, 2026, shows just a small portion of one of the Orion Molecular Clouds, a long and massive filament of cold gas and dust beyond the Orion Nebula. Every stage of star formation — from the youngest stellar embryos to protoplanetary discs to newly-minted pre-main sequence stars — is contained within this scene which stretches 150 light-years across.

Read more about this image.

Image credit: ESA/Webb, NASA & CSA, T. Megeath, M. Zamani (ESA/Webb); Acknowledgement: M. H. Özsaraç

A new study of two supernova remnants, the debris left behind after stars explode, suggests the explosions came from stellar siblings that once orbited each other. The first star’s detonation sent its binary companion hurtling through space, and then, after traveling for thousands of years, the surviving star blew up too.

“Using 16 years of data from NASA’s Fermi Gamma-ray Space Telescope, our analysis uncovered gamma rays associated with a supernova remnant that was hidden in the glare of its neighbor, the Jellyfish Nebula, one of the brightest gamma-ray-emitting supernova remnants known,” said Miltiadis Michailidis, a postdoctoral fellow in the physics department at Stanford University in California. “There are so many striking connections between the two remnants that we conclude they’re likely related, giving us the first known example of a binary system where both stars have undergone supernova explosions.”

Michailidis presented the findings Wednesday at the 248th meeting of the American Astronomical Society in Pasadena, California. A paper describing the results will appear in a future edition of Nature Communications.

The study focused on a faint supernova remnant called G189.6+3.3, which is mainly visible in X-rays. It is upstaged by its brighter and better-known neighbor, the Jellyfish Nebula (IC 443). The two star wrecks, both located in the constellation Gemini, appear to partially overlap as seen in X-rays. Recent X-ray evidence suggests that hot plasma likely associated with G189.6+3.3 may extend across the entire region, a hint that the overlap may be nearly total.

A massive star explodes when its energy-producing core runs out of fuel and collapses under its own weight, triggering an explosion that blows the star apart. The explosion’s shock wave encloses a hot cloud of debris that rapidly expands into space. So far, astronomers have cataloged about 300 supernova remnants in our galaxy.  

The Fermi mission is part of NASA’s fleet of observatories monitoring the changing cosmos to help humanity better understand how the universe works. More than a decade ago, observations from Fermi’s LAT (Large Area Telescope) showed that the shock waves of supernova remnants accelerated particles to within a fraction of the speed of light, a process first proposed by physicist Enrico Fermi — the mission’s namesake — in 1949.

These high-speed particles, called cosmic rays, interact with interstellar gas to produce gamma rays, the highest-energy form of light. Protons make up 99% of cosmic ray particles. To prove that accelerated protons are responsible for the glow, astronomers search for a specific gamma-ray feature. When cosmic-ray protons smash into interstellar gas, they produce a short-lived particle called a neutral pion, which almost immediately decays into a pair of gamma rays. This emission occurs within a specific band of energies associated with the neutral pion’s mass and lies within the range detected by Fermi’s LAT instrument.

In 2013, Fermi observations proved that the Jellyfish Nebula, which is interacting with part of a glowing cloud of hydrogen gas known as Sharpless 249, produced gamma rays through this mechanism. Its neighbor, G189.6+3.3, was discovered in 1994 as part of an X-ray survey by the German-led ROSAT (Roentgen Satellite) mission.

A bright filament of gas lies between the overlapping remnants. New observations of this feature reveal that the shock wave from G189.6+3.3 slammed into dense interstellar gas there and dramatically slowed, key evidence that both remnants are interacting with the same cloud system.

Astronomers think the Jellyfish Nebula is also a candidate PeVatron, a cosmic particle accelerator capable of boosting protons to energies so high they could nearly escape our galaxy. Such particles can produce gamma rays with trillions of times more energy than visible light. Finding a second particle accelerator near the Jellyfish Nebula could offer scientists new clues for how supernova remnants develop into PeVatrons.

“The overlapping remnants, a connecting gas filament, and the availability of data from Fermi and other facilities motivated us to delve into this complex but little-studied region,” said co-author Marianne Lemoine-Goumard, an astrophysicist at the French National Centre for Scientific Research (CNRS) based at the University of Bordeaux. “With Fermi’s LAT instrument, we found gamma-ray emission associated with accelerated protons in the northern part of the fainter remnant. If both remnants are interacting with the same structure, then they must share a common distance from us.”

The team concludes the remnants lie about 6,000 light-years away, their explosion centers are separated by roughly 40 light-years projected onto the plane of the sky, and the original stars may have been 20 or more times the Sun’s mass.

Estimates of the remnants’ ages vary widely, but the team concludes that the age of the Jellyfish Nebula is 8,000 to 9,000 years, while G189.6+3.3 is between 20,000 to 110,000 years old. This means the delay between the explosions could have extended for up to 100,000 years.

In addition, the team conducted computer simulations of a million massive binary systems. They show that systems where the stars orbit close enough to exchange matter and interact during their lives can readily produce dual supernova explosions with similar separations and time delays as those found for the remnants. The team also estimated that the chance of randomly encountering this combination of observed spatial alignment and compatible distances to be less than 1%, strongly supporting a physical association.

“The evidence we’ve compiled — including observations across the spectrum, the chemical and physical properties of the remnants, simulations, and more — paints a compelling picture of a dual supernova event,” said Michailidis.

This study identifies a unique possible example of a binary system where both stars exploded as supernovae and left behind separate, detectable supernova remnants. Astronomers think that most massive stars form in binary or multiple-star systems. The Jellyfish Nebula/G189.6+3.3 complex offers astronomers a rare opportunity to study how massive binary stars evolve, exchange matter, explode, and experience velocity changes — called kicks — induced by the supernova blast. It also provides a powerful new laboratory for understanding how coupled supernova remnants behave, including how they accelerate particles, generate gamma rays, and shape their surrounding environments.

“Fermi’s gamma-ray observations of supernova remnants continue to reveal the dynamic lives of stars,” said Elizabeth Hays, the Fermi project scientist at NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center in Greenbelt, Maryland. “We can now connect the glowing remains of two massive stars to a powerful pair that evolved together over thousands of years.”

By Francis Reddy
NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, Md.

Media Contact:
Claire Andreoli
301-286-1940
NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, Md.

Astronomers have discovered chemical differences between binary stars that indicate one has devoured at least one planet.

A new study of two supernova remnants, the debris left behind after stars explode, suggests the explosions came from stellar siblings that once orbited each other. The first star’s detonation sent its binary companion hurtling through space, and then, after traveling for thousands of years, the surviving star blew up too.

“Using 16 years of data from NASA’s Fermi Gamma-ray Space Telescope, our analysis uncovered gamma rays associated with a supernova remnant that was hidden in the glare of its neighbor, the Jellyfish Nebula, one of the brightest gamma-ray-emitting supernova remnants known,” said Miltiadis Michailidis, a postdoctoral fellow in the physics department at Stanford University in California. “There are so many striking connections between the two remnants that we conclude they’re likely related, giving us the first known example of a binary system where both stars have undergone supernova explosions.”

Michailidis presented the findings Wednesday at the 248th meeting of the American Astronomical Society in Pasadena, California. A paper describing the results will appear in a future edition of Nature Communications.

The study focused on a faint supernova remnant called G189.6+3.3, which is mainly visible in X-rays. It is upstaged by its brighter and better-known neighbor, the Jellyfish Nebula (IC 443). The two star wrecks, both located in the constellation Gemini, appear to partially overlap as seen in X-rays. Recent X-ray evidence suggests that hot plasma likely associated with G189.6+3.3 may extend across the entire region, a hint that the overlap may be nearly total.

A massive star explodes when its energy-producing core runs out of fuel and collapses under its own weight, triggering an explosion that blows the star apart. The explosion’s shock wave encloses a hot cloud of debris that rapidly expands into space. So far, astronomers have cataloged about 300 supernova remnants in our galaxy.  

The Fermi mission is part of NASA’s fleet of observatories monitoring the changing cosmos to help humanity better understand how the universe works. More than a decade ago, observations from Fermi’s LAT (Large Area Telescope) showed that the shock waves of supernova remnants accelerated particles to within a fraction of the speed of light, a process first proposed by physicist Enrico Fermi — the mission’s namesake — in 1949.

These high-speed particles, called cosmic rays, interact with interstellar gas to produce gamma rays, the highest-energy form of light. Protons make up 99% of cosmic ray particles. To prove that accelerated protons are responsible for the glow, astronomers search for a specific gamma-ray feature. When cosmic-ray protons smash into interstellar gas, they produce a short-lived particle called a neutral pion, which almost immediately decays into a pair of gamma rays. This emission occurs within a specific band of energies associated with the neutral pion’s mass and lies within the range detected by Fermi’s LAT instrument.

In 2013, Fermi observations proved that the Jellyfish Nebula, which is interacting with part of a glowing cloud of hydrogen gas known as Sharpless 249, produced gamma rays through this mechanism. Its neighbor, G189.6+3.3, was discovered in 1994 as part of an X-ray survey by the German-led ROSAT (Roentgen Satellite) mission.

A bright filament of gas lies between the overlapping remnants. New observations of this feature reveal that the shock wave from G189.6+3.3 slammed into dense interstellar gas there and dramatically slowed, key evidence that both remnants are interacting with the same cloud system.

Astronomers think the Jellyfish Nebula is also a candidate PeVatron, a cosmic particle accelerator capable of boosting protons to energies so high they could nearly escape our galaxy. Such particles can produce gamma rays with trillions of times more energy than visible light. Finding a second particle accelerator near the Jellyfish Nebula could offer scientists new clues for how supernova remnants develop into PeVatrons.

“The overlapping remnants, a connecting gas filament, and the availability of data from Fermi and other facilities motivated us to delve into this complex but little-studied region,” said co-author Marianne Lemoine-Goumard, an astrophysicist at the French National Centre for Scientific Research (CNRS) based at the University of Bordeaux. “With Fermi’s LAT instrument, we found gamma-ray emission associated with accelerated protons in the northern part of the fainter remnant. If both remnants are interacting with the same structure, then they must share a common distance from us.”

The team concludes the remnants lie about 6,000 light-years away, their explosion centers are separated by roughly 40 light-years projected onto the plane of the sky, and the original stars may have been 20 or more times the Sun’s mass.

Estimates of the remnants’ ages vary widely, but the team concludes that the age of the Jellyfish Nebula is 8,000 to 9,000 years, while G189.6+3.3 is between 20,000 to 110,000 years old. This means the delay between the explosions could have extended for up to 100,000 years.

In addition, the team conducted computer simulations of a million massive binary systems. They show that systems where the stars orbit close enough to exchange matter and interact during their lives can readily produce dual supernova explosions with similar separations and time delays as those found for the remnants. The team also estimated that the chance of randomly encountering this combination of observed spatial alignment and compatible distances to be less than 1%, strongly supporting a physical association.

“The evidence we’ve compiled — including observations across the spectrum, the chemical and physical properties of the remnants, simulations, and more — paints a compelling picture of a dual supernova event,” said Michailidis.

This study identifies a unique possible example of a binary system where both stars exploded as supernovae and left behind separate, detectable supernova remnants. Astronomers think that most massive stars form in binary or multiple-star systems. The Jellyfish Nebula/G189.6+3.3 complex offers astronomers a rare opportunity to study how massive binary stars evolve, exchange matter, explode, and experience velocity changes — called kicks — induced by the supernova blast. It also provides a powerful new laboratory for understanding how coupled supernova remnants behave, including how they accelerate particles, generate gamma rays, and shape their surrounding environments.

“Fermi’s gamma-ray observations of supernova remnants continue to reveal the dynamic lives of stars,” said Elizabeth Hays, the Fermi project scientist at NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center in Greenbelt, Maryland. “We can now connect the glowing remains of two massive stars to a powerful pair that evolved together over thousands of years.”

By Francis Reddy
NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, Md.

Media Contact:
Claire Andreoli
301-286-1940
NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, Md.

The post NASA’s Fermi Mission Uncovers Possible Sibling Supernova Remnants appeared first on NASA Science.

On June 17, in the year 2 B.C.E, a significant planetary conjunction occurred involving Venus and Jupiter. From Earth’s perspective, these two bright planets appeared to draw so close that they would have seemed to merge into nearly a single, brilliant object in the sky. This type of celestial alignment occurs because planets move inContinue reading "June 17, 2 BCE: A conjunction between Venus and Jupiter"

The post June 17, 2 BCE: A conjunction between Venus and Jupiter appeared first on Astronomy Magazine.

Researchers using two of humanity’s most powerful observatories — NASA’s James Webb and Hubble Space Telescopes — have definitively shown that Terzan 5 is not a globular star cluster as it was once classified, offering new insight into how galaxies like our own form and evolve over time. A globular star cluster typically has only one ancient star population. New data not only confirms the existence of two distinct populations of stars in Terzan 5, but also provides evidence for two more recent rounds of star formation. Although located within the crowded bulge of our Milky Way, our galaxy’s central, spherical region of older stars, Terzan 5 was massive enough to maintain its separate identity while lighter weight systems spread out and mixed to form the bulge billions of years ago. It’s like a lump in an otherwise well-mixed cake batter.

“Webb’s new near-infrared observations, cross-referenced with Hubble’s archival observations, have given us a much clearer picture of the history of Terzan 5,” said Giorgia Zullo, who led the research and is a PhD student at the University of Bologna in Italy.

These results were presented at a press conference Tuesday at the 248th meeting of the American Astronomical Society in Pasadena, and were published in Astronomy & Astrophysics.

Image: Bulge Fossil Fragment Terzan 5 (Webb and Hubble Image)

Four generations of stars

Discovered in 1968 by astronomer Azop Terzan, Terzan 5 resembles a globular cluster in many ways. However, in 2009 this system was discovered to harbor two distinct populations of stars. In 2016 Hubble provided the first estimate of their ages, showing that one formed roughly 12 billion years ago — as the Milky Way itself was assembling — and the other about 5 billion years ago, just before Earth started forming. This pointed to a more complex history than a typical globular cluster.

Studying Terzan 5 is complicated by its location in a region of our galaxy crowded with stars and heavily obscured by dust. This is where Webb stepped in. Its infrared view allowed the research team to peer through the dust and catalog many more stars, and fainter stars, than previous work. By measuring star colors and brightnesses, astronomers can classify them into populations of different ages and chemistries.

Webb was able to measure these key properties for every star within the field of view in the sky — both stars within Terzan 5 and unrelated foreground stars. To isolate the stars of Terzan 5, the team relied on the power and longevity of Hubble. The 12-year separation allowed the team to measure very small movements of individual stars, known as proper motions, to determine which stars belong to Terzan 5 and which are part of the Milky Way bulge.

By combining data from both Webb and Hubble, the researchers found strong evidence for two more stellar populations, one that formed 3.8 billion years ago and another only 2.5 billion years ago. They also were able to determine the ages of the previously known stellar populations with unprecedented precision, finding that they formed 12.5 billion and 4.7 billion years ago.

With the previously known two generations of stars, astronomers could not rule out the possibility that Terzan 5 interacted with another object, like a globular cluster or a giant molecular cloud, becoming enriched with new gas and dust that set off a second round of star formation. With four stellar generations, those explanations are ruled out.

Measurements of the stellar composition of Terzan 5 populations made at the W. M. Keck Observatory and European Southern Observatory’s Very Large Telescope also point toward very distinct populations. “Along with the ages of these populations, the cluster preserves a fossil record of progressive enrichment of heavy elements by supernovae,” said co-author R. Michael Rich, a research astronomer at the University of California, Los Angeles.

Terzan 5 formed multiple generations of stars because it was able to retain the necessary raw materials. There is evidence of powerful supernova explosions in Terzan 5 that forged heavier elements that were swept up by subsequent generations of stars. In lighter weight systems, the force of the explosions themselves could have ejected the resulting elements as well as sweeping out leftover gas and dust. The progenitor of Terzan 5 had enough mass to retain those stars’ ejections, allowing new generations of stars to form over billions of years.

‘Bulge fossil fragment’

The results show that Terzan 5 is most likely the remnant of a much more massive stellar system that initially formed 12.5 billion years ago. Terzan 5 is extraordinary because it survived — and never merged or fully “mixed in” with the Milky Way’s bulge. “For some reason, this peculiar clump of stars formed separately from the bulge and was not destroyed as the bulge itself formed,” said Francesco R. Ferraro, a professor at the University of Bologna and principal investigator of the Webb observations. “Terzan 5 is what we now call a bulge fossil fragment because it resembles the primordial clumps that contributed to the formation of the bulge.”

To date, there’s one other known cosmic object like Terzan 5. Liller 1 was the second to be reclassified from a globular star cluster to a bulge fossil fragment. It also contains multiple generations of stars. There may be more objects like it. Between 40 to 50 additional globular clusters that orbit within the bulge will be examined by Ferraro’s team to determine if their stellar populations are all the same, like globular clusters, or have several generations, like bulge fossil fragments. 

Video: Zoom to See Terzan 5 Near Our Milky Way Galaxy’s Bulge

Potential parallels for galaxy formation near, far

Ultimately, this research may improve what we know about how the central bulges of galaxies form over hundreds of millions of years. “Based on observations and in-depth simulations, we think that galaxies in the early universe had huge disks of gas that fragmented into clumps and formed stars. These clumps migrated to the center of the galaxies, and many merged to form their bulges,” said Barbara Lanzoni, a co-author and associate professor at the University of Bologna. For example, Webb has turned up several examples of “clumpy” galaxies that were actively forming when the universe was only a few hundred million years old, like the clumps in the Firefly Sparkle galaxy. “Terzan 5 may provide direct evidence that can help explain how bulges formed in galaxies throughout the universe,” Lanzoni said.

The James Webb Space Telescope is the world’s premier space science observatory. Webb is solving mysteries in our solar system, looking beyond to distant worlds around other stars, and probing the mysterious structures and origins of our universe and our place in it. Webb is an international program led by NASA with its partners, ESA (European Space Agency) and CSA (Canadian Space Agency).

The Hubble Space Telescope has been operating for over three decades and continues to make ground-breaking discoveries that shape our fundamental understanding of the universe. Hubble is a project of international cooperation between NASA and ESA (European Space Agency). NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center in Greenbelt, Maryland, manages the telescope and mission operations. Lockheed Martin Space, based in Denver, also supports mission operations at Goddard. The Space Telescope Science Institute in Baltimore, which is operated by the Association of Universities for Research in Astronomy, conducts Hubble science operations for NASA.

To learn more about Webb, visit:

https://science.nasa.gov/webb

To learn more about Hubble, visit:

https://science.nasa.gov/hubble

Downloads & Related Information

The following sections contain links to download this article’s images and videos in all available resolutions followed by related information links, media contacts, and if available, research paper and Spanish translation links.

Related Links

Read more: Hubble’s star clusters

Explore more: ViewSpace | Forms of light: the Cluster Omega Centauri

Watch: Globular Clusters, Stellar Pockets

Watch: Sorting the Stars in Omega Centauri

Webb: News | Images | Science | Home Page

Hubble: News | Images | Science | Home Page

Researchers using two of humanity’s most powerful observatories — NASA’s James Webb and Hubble Space Telescopes — have definitively shown that Terzan 5 is not a globular star cluster as it was once classified, offering new insight into how galaxies like our own form and evolve over time. A globular star cluster typically has only one ancient star population. New data not only confirms the existence of two distinct populations of stars in Terzan 5, but also provides evidence for two more recent rounds of star formation. Although located within the crowded bulge of our Milky Way, our galaxy’s central, spherical region of older stars, Terzan 5 was massive enough to maintain its separate identity while lighter weight systems spread out and mixed to form the bulge billions of years ago. It’s like a lump in an otherwise well-mixed cake batter.

“Webb’s new near-infrared observations, cross-referenced with Hubble’s archival observations, have given us a much clearer picture of the history of Terzan 5,” said Giorgia Zullo, who led the research and is a PhD student at the University of Bologna in Italy.

These results were presented at a press conference Tuesday at the 248th meeting of the American Astronomical Society in Pasadena, and were published in Astronomy & Astrophysics.

Image: Bulge Fossil Fragment Terzan 5 (Webb and Hubble Image)

Four generations of stars

Discovered in 1968 by astronomer Azop Terzan, Terzan 5 resembles a globular cluster in many ways. However, in 2009 this system was discovered to harbor two distinct populations of stars. In 2016 Hubble provided the first estimate of their ages, showing that one formed roughly 12 billion years ago — as the Milky Way itself was assembling — and the other about 5 billion years ago, just before Earth started forming. This pointed to a more complex history than a typical globular cluster.

Studying Terzan 5 is complicated by its location in a region of our galaxy crowded with stars and heavily obscured by dust. This is where Webb stepped in. Its infrared view allowed the research team to peer through the dust and catalog many more stars, and fainter stars, than previous work. By measuring star colors and brightnesses, astronomers can classify them into populations of different ages and chemistries.

Webb was able to measure these key properties for every star within the field of view in the sky — both stars within Terzan 5 and unrelated foreground stars. To isolate the stars of Terzan 5, the team relied on the power and longevity of Hubble. The 12-year separation allowed the team to measure very small movements of individual stars, known as proper motions, to determine which stars belong to Terzan 5 and which are part of the Milky Way bulge.

By combining data from both Webb and Hubble, the researchers found strong evidence for two more stellar populations, one that formed 3.8 billion years ago and another only 2.5 billion years ago. They also were able to determine the ages of the previously known stellar populations with unprecedented precision, finding that they formed 12.5 billion and 4.7 billion years ago.

With the previously known two generations of stars, astronomers could not rule out the possibility that Terzan 5 interacted with another object, like a globular cluster or a giant molecular cloud, becoming enriched with new gas and dust that set off a second round of star formation. With four stellar generations, those explanations are ruled out.

Measurements of the stellar composition of Terzan 5 populations made at the W. M. Keck Observatory and European Southern Observatory’s Very Large Telescope also point toward very distinct populations. “Along with the ages of these populations, the cluster preserves a fossil record of progressive enrichment of heavy elements by supernovae,” said co-author R. Michael Rich, a research astronomer at the University of California, Los Angeles.

Terzan 5 formed multiple generations of stars because it was able to retain the necessary raw materials. There is evidence of powerful supernova explosions in Terzan 5 that forged heavier elements that were swept up by subsequent generations of stars. In lighter weight systems, the force of the explosions themselves could have ejected the resulting elements as well as sweeping out leftover gas and dust. The progenitor of Terzan 5 had enough mass to retain those stars’ ejections, allowing new generations of stars to form over billions of years.

‘Bulge fossil fragment’

The results show that Terzan 5 is most likely the remnant of a much more massive stellar system that initially formed 12.5 billion years ago. Terzan 5 is extraordinary because it survived — and never merged or fully “mixed in” with the Milky Way’s bulge. “For some reason, this peculiar clump of stars formed separately from the bulge and was not destroyed as the bulge itself formed,” said Francesco R. Ferraro, a professor at the University of Bologna and principal investigator of the Webb observations. “Terzan 5 is what we now call a bulge fossil fragment because it resembles the primordial clumps that contributed to the formation of the bulge.”

To date, there’s one other known cosmic object like Terzan 5. Liller 1 was the second to be reclassified from a globular star cluster to a bulge fossil fragment. It also contains multiple generations of stars. There may be more objects like it. Between 40 to 50 additional globular clusters that orbit within the bulge will be examined by Ferraro’s team to determine if their stellar populations are all the same, like globular clusters, or have several generations, like bulge fossil fragments. 

Video: Zoom to See Terzan 5 Near Our Milky Way Galaxy’s Bulge

Potential parallels for galaxy formation near, far

Ultimately, this research may improve what we know about how the central bulges of galaxies form over hundreds of millions of years. “Based on observations and in-depth simulations, we think that galaxies in the early universe had huge disks of gas that fragmented into clumps and formed stars. These clumps migrated to the center of the galaxies, and many merged to form their bulges,” said Barbara Lanzoni, a co-author and associate professor at the University of Bologna. For example, Webb has turned up several examples of “clumpy” galaxies that were actively forming when the universe was only a few hundred million years old, like the clumps in the Firefly Sparkle galaxy. “Terzan 5 may provide direct evidence that can help explain how bulges formed in galaxies throughout the universe,” Lanzoni said.

The James Webb Space Telescope is the world’s premier space science observatory. Webb is solving mysteries in our solar system, looking beyond to distant worlds around other stars, and probing the mysterious structures and origins of our universe and our place in it. Webb is an international program led by NASA with its partners, ESA (European Space Agency) and CSA (Canadian Space Agency).

The Hubble Space Telescope has been operating for over three decades and continues to make ground-breaking discoveries that shape our fundamental understanding of the universe. Hubble is a project of international cooperation between NASA and ESA (European Space Agency). NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center in Greenbelt, Maryland, manages the telescope and mission operations. Lockheed Martin Space, based in Denver, also supports mission operations at Goddard. The Space Telescope Science Institute in Baltimore, which is operated by the Association of Universities for Research in Astronomy, conducts Hubble science operations for NASA.

To learn more about Webb, visit:

https://science.nasa.gov/webb

To learn more about Hubble, visit:

https://science.nasa.gov/hubble

Downloads & Related Information

The following sections contain links to download this article’s images and videos in all available resolutions followed by related information links, media contacts, and if available, research paper and Spanish translation links.

Related Links

Read more: Hubble’s star clusters

Explore more: ViewSpace | Forms of light: the Cluster Omega Centauri

Watch: Globular Clusters, Stellar Pockets

Watch: Sorting the Stars in Omega Centauri

Webb: News | Images | Science | Home Page

Hubble: News | Images | Science | Home Page

The post NASA Webb, Hubble Reveal History of Relic of Milky Way’s Formation appeared first on NASA Science.

NASA's Chandra X-ray spacecraft has detected the supernova wreckage of a dead star that erupted 1,700 years ago and ejected debris at 2 million miles per hour.

On June 12, 2021, Nova Herculis 2021 (V1674 Herculis) erupted, and was discovered by amateur astronomer Seiji Ueda of Japan. The white dwarf quickly became visible to the naked eye, surging to 10,000 times brighter than it originally had been. Its speed was unprecedented: V1674 Herculis faded from that peak brightness in just over oneContinue reading "June 12, 2021: Seiji Ueda discovers Nova Herculis 2021"

The post June 12, 2021: Seiji Ueda discovers Nova Herculis 2021 appeared first on Astronomy Magazine.

Eyes on Exoplanets Tutorial

Welcome to NASA’s Eyes on Exoplanets! Use this tutorial to start exploring worlds beyond our own. With this 3D interactive tool, you can visit all the stars beyond the Sun where we’ve found other planets, called exoplanets. 

Choose a star or exoplanet and see an artist’s concept of what it might look like. Spin it around to see its sun and planetary system. Learn how long a trip there from Earth would take at light speed — or by jet plane, or family car!

Study the real versions of planets and stars cited in your favorite science fiction. See which planets reside in habitable zones, where liquid water could exist on their surfaces. Or, search “Where We Explore,” stars that future space telescopes will target when looking for Earth-like planets. You can also choose your location on Earth and see what’s in the sky above you right now.

Select any of the stars shown to see how many planets have already been found there. Examine how those star systems compare to the layout of our solar system, or check the sizes of individual planets — are they as small as Earth, or as big as Jupiter? 

See all the different techniques we’ve used to confirm the 6,000+ exoplanets discovered so far — among the billions we believe exist in the galaxy — and the many observatories, on Earth and in space, that have detected them. You can also browse some of our favorite weird worlds, or destinations featured in our Exoplanet Travel Bureau.

Where will you explore?

Transcript

Welcome to NASA’s Eyes on Exoplanets. With this interactive tool, you can explore all of the stars beyond the Sun where we’ve discovered planets known as exoplanets. When you enter the site, the default is this view from space. You can start your exploration here. Or if you know of a specific star or exoplanet you want to visit, enter that in the search bar at upper right. 

You can also select View from Earth. Choose your location and see what’s in the sky above you right now. Click and drag to explore different parts of the sky. In the lower right corner, you can choose different display options. You can see the constellations, view only stars that are visible to the naked eye, or see the stars that are good places for future telescopes to search for planets like Earth. 

These future target stars are shown as filled-in circles. If you click the gear symbol and switch from the star symbol to the circled number, you will see how many exoplanets have already been found around the star shown. 

When you select a star, you have three different view options. Starting in System View, you will see the star and where planets are located around it. The shaded green area marks the habitable zone, the region around a star where a planet could have liquid water on the surface, a key to the search for life beyond Earth. You can also see how this system compares to our solar system by selecting that feature in the lower right. The star view will show a hypothetical view of what the star might look like. 

Click “Learn More” to see basic information about the star, including its history and pop-culture references. You can see how it compares to our Sun and solar system and what we found so far. Under “How to Detect a Planet in the System,” you can learn about the different ways to discover an exoplanet and see how many planets have been found with each technique, as well as the prospects for discovering more. Finally, the planet view allows you to explore each planet in the system. 

For each confirmed exoplanet, you’ll see an artist’s concept of what it might look like and see how it compares to other planets. Planets also have an option to learn more, where you can see how far away it is, how long it would take to get there, how it was discovered, and which observatory found it. 

To see other discoveries made by that observatory, click “Browse Destinations” in the upper right menu. There you can also find curated lists of featured discoveries and truly weird worlds. 

As you can see, there are so many worlds to discover. Where will you explore?

The post Eyes on Exoplanets Tutorial appeared first on NASA Science.

A new study has taken a fresh look at a late 2025 Yonsei University study claiming the universe’s expansion is stalling out and instead has found that the universe is still expanding as previously believed.

Led by researchers from the University of Southampton, the team behind the new analysis acknowledged the scientific value of the 2025 team’s work, noting that their calculations were not wrong but lacked the additional data needed to confirm the universe’s expansion rather than refute it.

The lead author of the 2025 study, Dr. Chul Chung, told The Debrief that he and his colleagues “have already submitted our response to Wiseman, Riess et al. 2026 on May 14,” adding that the paper, “Still accelerating: age bias correction in supernova cosmology is robust to host-progenitor age mapping,” has also been posted on arXiv.

“The abstract summarizes the two main issues we identify in Wiseman et al., so I think it provides a concise overview of our position,” Chung told The Debrief.

Challenging Universal Expansion

According to a statement announcing the findings, scientists first confirmed the universe’s expansion was accelerating in 2011, a discovery that won astrophysicists Professor Adam Riess and Professor Brian Schmidt the Nobel Prize in Physics. Since that discovery, cosmological models have incorporated this accelerating expansion, with experiments on dark matter and dark energy attempting to explain it.

Then last year, a separate team of astronomers announced that a new analysis of stellar phenomena indicated that the universe was no longer expanding. Adding to the controversy was the team’s claim that dark energy may not exist, citing the lack of concrete evidence for a universe undergoing accelerating expansion.

According to the Southampton-led team behind the new study, the 2025 study suggested that previous methods used to measure the universe’s expansion, such as measuring supernovae, “were fundamentally flawed.”

“This points to a time-varying dark energy and a universe that is no longer accelerating, representing a potential paradigm shift in cosmology if confirmed,” explained Professor Chul Chung, co-lead author on the study, in a 2025 email to The Debrief.

The claims sent shockwaves through the scientific community, a result that the researchers note could have dismantled the Nobel Prize-winning team’s historic findings, and “nearly three decades of astronomical progress.”

When discussing the 2025 team’s work, the lead author of the new study, Dr Phil Wiseman, said the team’s findings and the resulting debate were not necessarily incorrect. Instead, the Southampton researcher said it was primarily a result of a scientific understanding.

“The previous and well-accepted measurements were, in fact, fine and our current understanding of the fate of the universe remains robust.”

Recalculating Galaxy Masses and White Dwarf Star Ages Reestablishes Expansion

In their reanalysis, the Southampton-led team recalibrated the original data to account for variables not in the original study. According to Wiseman, these included “different host environments and populations.”

For example, the research team looked at Type 1a supernovae, which are violet, extremely bright explosions of white dwarf stars. The authors of the 2025 study claimed that this class of supernova had “different maximum brightness,” which had tricked astronomers into thinking the cosmos was accelerating, when their analysis said it was actually slowing down.

When they took a fresh look at the data, the Southampton team found that they had incorrectly estimated the age of these stars. The new study also says the 2025 team didn’t account for the mass of the galaxies hosting these cosmological phenomena, which they described as “a standard correction used in modern cosmology to prove accuracy.”

When his team factored those data points in, Wiseman said the evidence for a stalling expansion was not supported. Instead, the researcher observed that “the evidence for cosmic acceleration remains remarkably consistent.”

In their reply on ArXiv, the Yonsei University team said the new research failed to factor in two variables of their own, adding that “when these two effects are consistently combined in computing the redshift-dependent magnitude correction, the final correction, and hence the resulting cosmological impact, remain largely unchanged,” from the original 2025 calculations.

“Extraordinary Claims Require Especially Careful Testing”

When discussing the new study’s findings, Southampton Professor Mark Sullivan highlighted the benefits of scientific review, noting that “this is how progress is made.”

“Although this idea did not turn out correct, it has opened up new ways of thinking about how supernovae explode and how we can measure dark energy more accurately,” the researcher added.

Paper co-author, Dr Brodie Popovic agreed, noting that the 2025 study provided astronomers a good opportunity to “go back over all of our assumptions,” adding that “it turns out, yes, we do understand this stuff, and we’re accounting for it in our cosmology measurement.”

In a salute to the Sagan Standard established by astronomer Carl Sagan, which says “extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence,” Reiss seemed to celebrate the new findings that reestablish his original work by quipping that “extraordinary claims require especially careful testing.”

With the accelerating expansion of the universe seemingly reestablished, at least for now, Dr Wiseman said: “we can get back to trying to understand what dark energy actually is, rather than wondering if it exists at all.”

“Thankfully we have averted this crisis, but the mystery about why the universe is still accelerating in size remains,” he added. 

The study “Still Accelerating: Type Ia supernova cosmology is robust to host galaxy age evolution” was published in Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society.

Christopher Plain is a Science Fiction and Fantasy novelist and Head Science Writer at The Debrief. Follow and connect with him on X, learn about his books at plainfiction.com, or email him directly at christopher@thedebrief.org.

Zooming through the galaxy faster than they should, hypervelocity stars are a curious population of stars whose origins are often difficult to determine. A recent study presents the first evidence of an old, low-mass hypervelocity star launched from the Milky Way’s center, providing clues into this elusive set of fast-moving stars.

Flinging Fast Stars

Astronomers have caught a number of hypervelocity stars zipping through the Milky Way since their first discovery in 2005. With speeds fast enough to escape the galaxy, hypervelocity stars were launched off course by some strong dynamical interaction. One such method, known as the Hills mechanism, predicts that when a binary star system approaches the Milky Way’s central supermassive black hole, one binary member is captured by the black hole and the other is flung away with high velocity.

However, constraining a hypervelocity star’s origin to the galactic center is limited by uncertainties in distances and proper motions, muddling how well researchers have been able to trace their orbits backward. Among a number of candidate galactic center–origin hypervelocity stars, only one has been confidently identified as having been kicked from the galaxy’s center. Intriguingly, this hypervelocity star and most galactic center–origin candidates are young, massive stars — old, low-mass hypervelocity stars from the galactic center have yet to be identified.

What does this dearth of old, low-mass zooming stars mean? Either stars in the galactic center are preferentially young and massive, with fewer than expected old and small stars, or low-mass hypervelocity stars are missed by selection effects, challenging to detect in current surveys. Searching for hypervelocity stars with higher precision and sensitivity may allow astronomers to tease out this missing population and trace back more zooming stars to a Hills mechanism origin.

Discovering An Old Hypervelocity Star

Leveraging high-quality spectra from the Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument (DESI) survey and precise astrometry from Gaia, Shunhong Deng (University of Chinese Academy of Sciences; China West Normal University) and collaborators reported the discovery of the hypervelocity star DESI-HVS1. From the spectroscopic and astrometric analyses, the authors determined that DESI-HSV1 is a ~14-billion-year-old low-metallicity star with a mass about 80% that of the Sun’s, moving through the galaxy at 523 km/s.

Exploring the possible origins of this hypervelocity star, the authors integrated the star’s orbit backward in time for one billion years. The backward orbit integrations show the star approaching the galactic center where it then turns around, traveling away faster than the local escape velocity of the galaxy. Even when varying the galactic potential and constants, all orbit integrations suggest DESI-HVS1’s motion through the galaxy is most naturally explained by the Hills mechanism.

While more refined galaxy models and comparison to other candidate galactic center–origin hypervelocity stars are necessary to fully confirm its origins, DESI-HVS1 provides the first compelling evidence for an old, low-mass hypervelocity star candidate consistent with a galactic center launch. This suggests that the observed lack of such stars is likely not a reflection of the Milky Way’s central stellar population, but rather a consequence of observational constraints making such small hypervelocity stars particularly difficult to detect. As large spectroscopic and astrometric surveys continue to advance, the sample of galactic-center hypervelocity star candidates will grow, enabling further exploration of the stellar environment and dynamical processes at the Milky Way’s core.

Citation

“An Old, Low-mass, Metal-poor Hypervelocity Star Candidate Consistent with Galactic Center Origin,” Shunhong Deng et al 2026 ApJL 1003 L9. doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ae6505

The post Shot from the Heart of the Milky Way: Discovery of an Old Hypervelocity Star appeared first on AAS Nova.

Editor’s Note: Astrobites is a graduate-student-run organization that digests astrophysical literature for undergraduate students. As part of the partnership between the AAS and astrobites, we occasionally repost astrobites content here at AAS Nova. We hope you enjoy this post from astrobites; the original can be viewed at astrobites.org.

Title: Hunting for the First Explosions at the High-Redshift Frontier
Authors: Junehyoung Jeon et al.
First Author’s Institution: The University of Texas at Austin
Status: Published in ApJ

Back in the 1920s, astronomers discovered that we live within just one of many, many galaxies in the big, wide universe. Since then, we’ve been racing to search for the most distant galaxy that can be observed — in other words, searching for the oldest starlight we can see, since the light from these distant sources has been travelling towards us for most of the age of the universe. (Remember: more distant = higher redshift = longer lookback time.)

This race to the redshift frontier has had a pretty eventful history (see a great overview video here), which became even more eventful with the launch of JWST. JWST rapidly smashed the previous redshift (z) record of z = 10.6 by discovering a galaxy at z = 13.2, and then it broke its own record twice more. The current title holder sits at z = 14.4, observed less than 300 million years after the Big Bang.

Several galaxy candidates (to date unconfirmed) have now even been proposed at z ~ 25–32 (e.g., Capotauro), only 100 million years after the Big Bang! If real, these sources would pose a serious challenge to our understanding of the formation of the first galaxies, as galaxies shouldn’t really be observable at such early times. In today’s article, the authors put forward an intriguing alternative: what if some of these ultra-high-redshift candidates aren’t galaxies at all, but transient explosions from the universe’s first stars?

The First Stars and Their Explosive Endings

The earliest generation of stars (Population III; see my previous bite on these here) formed from pristine hydrogen and helium gas. Without metals to cool the gas efficiently, theory predicts that these stars were extremely massive, often exceeding 100 solar masses. While such stars would be short-lived, their deaths could be spectacular.

Population III stars of sufficient mass are predicted to end their lives as hyper-energetic pair-instability supernovae (PISNe). This is a long-winded name for a rapid, intensely hot explosion that leaves no remnant behind — not even a trace of the pre-existing star. Whilst nothing would remain of the star, the light emitted in that explosion could be bright enough to masquerade as a high-redshift galaxy candidate in current JWST surveys, but only if three key conditions are met:

1. JWST must observe a sufficiently overdense region, where lots of Population III stars can form very early.
2. A PISN must occur while JWST is “watching.”
3. The explosion must be bright enough to rise above JWST’s detection limits.

Simulating a (Biased) Universe

To address the likelihood of these conditions having already been met by existing JWST observations, the authors turn to cosmological simulations. Rather than simulating an “average” patch of the universe, they focus on an extremely overdense region (Fig. 1). This creates a rare but important environment where structures collapse earlier than usual. These regions are exactly where large numbers of Population III stars are expected to form at the highest redshifts.

In their simulations, star formation begins as early as z ~ 30–40 (within the first hundred million years after the Big Bang), producing Population III stars and, by extension, potential PISNe very shortly afterwards. While such overdense regions are rare, the authors show that the total area already surveyed by JWST (including large surveys such as CEERS, JADES, PRIMER, and COSMOS-Web) is large enough that it is plausible JWST has already observed at least one such region.

Catching a Cosmic Explosion in the Act

So, we can tick off condition #1: it’s possible that a sufficiently overdense region has already been observed by JWST. Next up, how lucky do we have to be to catch an explosion in the act (condition #2), so to speak? For this condition, cosmic time dilation actually works in our favour. A PISN explosion at z > 20 that lasts only months in its own rest frame can last for decades in the observed frame. (This whole time-being-relative thing sounds wacky because it is — please join me, Neil deGrasse Tyson, and countless others in struggling to imagine this.)

But would any such explosion be bright enough (condition #3)? Using theoretical PISN spectra, the authors show that these explosions could reach observed magnitudes of ~28–29 at z ~ 30 — right at the depth of current JWST deep surveys (Fig. 2). In fact, the predicted brightness and colours are somewhat comparable to those of some proposed z ~ 30 candidates (Fig. 3), raising the possibility that these objects could be PISNe rather than galaxies.

So… Are We Seeing the First Stars Die?

It’s not time to throw a party just yet. The authors note there are several caveats and uncertainties. The nature of Population III stars is still highly uncertain, JWST does not continuously monitor the same patch of sky, and identifying a PISN at such high redshift would be extremely challenging. Thanks to time dilation, these explosions would fade very slowly, making them hard to distinguish from steady sources using photometry alone. Alternatively, there are other plausible explanations for these ultra-high-redshift candidates: lower-redshift interlopers (a rather infamous example is CEERS-93316), local brown dwarfs, or even nearby exoplanets.

Still, the idea is exciting. If JWST were to detect a genuine PISN at z > 20, it would represent a direct glimpse of the very first stars, pushing observational astronomy into truly uncharted territory. For now, the most distant explosions in the universe may already be hiding in JWST images; we just have to learn how to recognise them.

Original astrobite edited by Nathalie Korhonen Cuestas.

About the author, Lucie Rowland:

I’m a fourth (and final!) year PhD student at Leiden Observatory in the Netherlands, studying massive, star forming galaxies in the early universe with ALMA and JWST. It’s a really exciting time to be interested in astronomy, so I hope to make groundbreaking new research more accessible!

The post The Oldest Starlight appeared first on AAS Nova.

Editor’s Note: Astrobites is a graduate-student-run organization that digests astrophysical literature for undergraduate students. As part of the partnership between the AAS and astrobites, we occasionally repost astrobites content here at AAS Nova. We hope you enjoy this post from astrobites; the original can be viewed at astrobites.org.

Title: GLIMPSE: An Ultrafaint ≃10⁵ M_⊙ Pop III Galaxy Candidate and First Constraints on the Pop III UV Luminosity Function at z ≃ 6–7
Authors: Seiji Fujimoto et al.
First Author’s Institution: University of Toronto; The University of Texas at Austin
Status: Published in ApJ

You, me, your laptop, my $8 matcha, and just about everything else on Earth was forged in the fiery bellies of dying stars. Generations of stars had to live and die before the universe became enriched with any elements heavier than helium (what astronomers call “metals”). The first stars to undergo this cosmic cycle are known as Population III (Pop III) stars. Though their existence has been hypothesized since the 1960s, astronomers have failed to observe these distant metal-free stars or the faint, low-mass galaxies that host them.

The first Pop III stars likely formed around 100 million years after the Big Bang in pristine pockets of hydrogen gas. Although these are too distant for us to observe, we expect that as the universe started to become metal enriched, there were still existing pockets of gas introverted enough to survive unpolluted and form metal-free Pop III stars up to a redshift of z ~ 6–7 (when the universe was around 900 million years old)!

JWST is the perfect instrument to search for these systems. You can read other astrobites on the search for possible Pop III systems with JWST here and here. The authors of today’s article seek to develop the most efficient way of using JWST’s Near-Infrared Camera (NIRCam) to find the galaxies hosting Pop III stars. Using their selection method on existing NIRCam data, the authors identified one promising Pop III galaxy candidate.

I’m Not Like Other Galaxies

In order to find a Pop III galaxy, we need to take a look at galaxies’ spectral energy distributions (SEDs). These are graphs that show the energy emitted by a galaxy at different wavelengths of light. Pop III galaxies are expected to have SEDs that differ from your everyday, metal-enriched galaxy. NIRCam will be especially sensitive to three key spectral features that show up in the SEDs of Pop III galaxies: an absent [O III] line (light emitted by doubly ionized oxygen atoms), a strong H-alpha line (light emitted when a hydrogen atom transitions from its third to its second energy level), and a significant Balmer jump (light absorbed to ionize electrons in the second energy level of a hydrogen atom). To identify these key SED characteristics, the authors use SED fitting and color–color diagrams to execute an efficient Pop III search with NIRCam.

The first selection method involves SED fitting. Astronomers create template SEDs that represent different types of galaxies and then compare these templates to the observed SEDs to see which one matches best. In this work, the authors use metal-rich galaxy templates and Pop III templates to fit the galaxies observed with NIRCam. They then calculate the chi-squared χ² (a statistical measure of best fit) between the data and all the SED templates. A galaxy is selected as a Pop III candidate if the Pop III model provides a good fit (χ² < 10) to the photometry and is significantly better than any metal-rich model. It’s kind of like looking for Cinderella by making every woman in the kingdom try on the glass slipper.

A color–color diagram plots the difference in magnitude between two filters on each axis. NIRCam filters are specially chosen to emphasize the SED characteristics above. When these filters are chosen, Pop III galaxies occupy a distinct region of this diagram as compared to metal-rich galaxies. For example, subtracting the F356W filter from the F277W filter is sensitive to the presence of the [O III] line and the Balmer jump. Figure 1 demonstrates how this color selection separates Pop III galaxies from typical galaxies.

O Pop III, Pop III, Wherefore Art Thou?

The authors apply their fresh new selection criteria to publicly available NIRCam data from large surveys. And (drum roll please) the slipper fits! The Pop III galaxy candidate GLIMPSE-16043 is an ultra-faint galaxy at z = 6.5. It was imaged in the GLIMPSE survey, which uses the technique of gravitational lensing to observe faint and distant galaxies.

The GLIMPSE survey targeted a massive galaxy cluster, Abell S1063. The cluster bends the light from distant galaxies and, like a giant lens, magnifies faraway objects, providing some of the deepest JWST imaging to date. The Pop III candidate passes both tests: it resides in the Pop III region of the color–color diagram, and its SED is best fit by a Pop III model, not a metal-rich galaxy model (see Figure 2). Next, spectroscopic follow-up is needed to ensure that this galaxy is truly metal free and not just extremely metal poor.

The authors conclude that our best shot at identifying additional Pop III galaxy candidates is using NIRCam to image large numbers of gravitationally lensed clusters. Without magnification from gravitational lensing, it may be impossible to see these ultra-faint Pop III galaxies. Once candidates have been identified, they can be followed up with deep spectroscopy to confirm their redshift and their lack of metals. Who knows? With these new methods, we may soon get a glimpse of the universe’s very first stars.

Original astrobite edited by Chris Layden and Margaret Verrico.

About the author, Madison VanWyngarden:

I am a first-year PhD student in astronomy and NSF Graduate Research Fellow at the University of Arizona. I study galaxy formation and evolution in the distant universe and am particularly interested in dusty star-forming galaxies. In my free time, I love reading, hiking, and baking bread!

The post A Possible GLIMPSE of the Universe’s First Stars appeared first on AAS Nova.