❌

Normal view

Fox’s $22B Roku acquisition aims to expand its reach into smart TVs, advertising

15 June 2026 at 19:29

Fox Corporation has agreed to buy Roku Inc. for $160 per share, an approximate enterprise value of $22 billion, the firms announced today.

The acquisition would unite Fox’s broadcast channels, including Fox, Fox News, Fox Business, and FS1, as well as its streaming businesses, including Tubi, a free ad-supported streaming television (FAST) platform that Fox bought in 2020, with Roku’s own FAST service, The Roku Channel, and Roku’s streaming hardware business, including its streaming sticks and smart TVs. Roku says it has 100 million households using its platform.

The most valuable part of Roku’s business isn't its hardware, which lost $19.1 million in the quarter ending March 31, 2026, but its the operating system (Roku OS) and advertising business. In that same quarter, Roku’s advertising and subscriptions business posted a gross profit of $584.1 million, with the advertising business pulling in $371 million in revenue. The COVID-19 pandemic helped Roku become profitable in 2021, but the company didn’t see annual profitability again until 2025.

Read full article

Comments

© Getty

Paramount accuses Netflix of "scorched-earth campaign" against WBD merger

9 June 2026 at 21:15

Paramount Skydance is accusing Netflix of maintaining a campaign against its proposed acquisition of Warner Bros. Discovery (WBD).

In a June 5 letter (PDF) addressed to Jared A. Hughes, acting section chief of the Media, Entertainment, and Communications Section of the US Department of Justice's (DOJ's) Antitrust Division, and A. Maya Kahn, a trial attorney for the Antitrust Division, and first reported on by Politico today, Paramount chief legal officer Makan Delrahim accused Netflix of trying to influence stakeholders about the merger. The letter reads:

Indeed, Netflix’s panic-level response and scorched-earth campaign to try and poison regulators and other stakeholders against the Transaction shows just how seriously Netflix takes Paramount as a scaled competitor.

The letter from Delrahim, a former assistant attorney general for the Antitrust Division, is a response to a letter that The International Brotherhood of Teamsters sent to the DOJ in March. The teamsters' letter argued that Paramount and WBD's merger would threaten film and TV workers. The union, which has 1.3 million members, asked the DOJ to block the merger "unless substantial and enforceable safeguards are put in place to increase domestic production and protect jobs," per an announcement from the group.

Read full article

Comments

© Mike Cohen/Getty Images for The New York Times

Third Star’s the Charm: Most Merging Black Holes Might Be in Triple Systems

27 May 2026 at 17:00

Illustration of merging black holes

Where do black hole mergers happen? Recent research finds evidence that most black hole mergers occur in triple systems containing a close inner binary and a more distant third party.

Assembling Merging Black Holes

Thanks to the combined efforts of the LIGO, Virgo, and KAGRA gravitational wave detectors, we’ve now collected the subtle signals from several hundred pairs of merging stellar-mass black holes. As this collection of spacetime ripples continues to grow, researchers are seeking to understand how these merging black hole pairs were assembled.

In the simplest scenario, pairs of high-mass stars independently evolve into black holes, lose momentum by emitting gravitational waves, and meld into one another. But the population of merging black holes likely contains contributions from multiple sources, including multiple-star systems, the disks surrounding accreting supermassive black holes, and black holes that have already experienced a merger. Which of these merging populations is reflected in our catalog of gravitational wave events?

Modeling Challenges

spin–orbit tilt diagram

A black hole binary system with aligned spins and orbit (top) and a binary with spins tilted by 90 degrees (bottom). [AAS Nova/Kerry Hensley]

In theory, this question can be answered by extracting the properties of merging black holes — mass, spin, and the like — from gravitational wave observations and comparing these properties against model predictions from different formation pathways. In reality, this is exceedingly difficult, as certain merger pathways can produce a wide variety of results, depending on assumptions or fine tuning.

So far, the increasingly large pool of gravitational wave detections tentatively points to a feature that could illuminate the sites of black hole mergers: a peak in the spin–orbit tilt distribution around 90 degrees. This feature has been most confidently extracted from nonparametric analyses, which do not make assumptions about the population of merging black holes, but it has also been hinted at in parametric analyses, which do make population-level assumptions.

Triple-System Feature

To investigate this feature further, a team led by Jakob Stegmann (Max Planck Institute for Astrophysics) performed a new, astrophysically motivated parametric analysis of the most recent catalog of gravitational wave detections from LIGO, Virgo, and KAGRA.

black hole populations used in modeling the observed spin–orbit tilt distribution

The three populations in the team’s modeling. [Stegmann et al. 2026]

Their modeling tests combinations of multiple populations, including mergers in isolated binary systems, triple-star systems, and dense environments like star clusters. They also include a potential contribution from higher-mass mergers involving black holes that have merged previously. Using this framework, Stegmann’s team found that the observed spin–orbit tilt distribution is best matched by a model dominated by mergers in triple-star systems, with some contribution from other sources.
Posterior predictive distribution of black hole spin–orbit tilts

Posterior predictive distribution of black hole spin–orbit tilts. Both the authors’ modeling (solid blue line) and the nonparametric modeling performed by the LIGO–Virgo–KAGRA collaboration (solid green line) find evidence for a peak in the spin–orbit tilt distribution near cosθ = 0. [Adapted from Stegmann et al. 2026]

Specifically, this finding suggests that most mergers occur in hierarchical triple systems, which naturally predict an excess of 90-degree spin–orbit tilts without any fine tuning. Hierarchical triples contain an inner close binary with a distant outer companion; in these systems, relativistic spin precession, gravitational wave emission, and oscillations in eccentricity and inclination work to tilt the black holes in the inner binary by 90 degrees.

Stegmann and collaborators pointed out that the triple-system scenario aligns well with other properties of the observed population of black hole mergers, such as the mass and effective spin distributions. This scenario may also be necessary to explain certain merging pairs that might have had slightly eccentric orbits at the moment of merging. If future gravitational wave observations strengthen the evidence for a peak in the spin–orbit tilt distribution near 90 degrees, it will have profound implications for how and where black holes merge in our universe.

Citation

“Gravitational-Wave Observations Suggest Most Black Hole Mergers Form in Triples,” Jakob Stegmann et al 2026 ApJL 1000 L59. doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ae52ec

The post Third Star’s the Charm: Most Merging Black Holes Might Be in Triple Systems appeared first on AAS Nova.

How Tilted Orbits Impact Supermassive Black Hole Collisions

22 April 2026 at 17:00

merging galaxies

What factors impact how long it takes for a supermassive black hole binary to merge? New research investigates the influence of orbital inclination on the population of merging black holes in our universe.

One Merger Leads to Another

NGC 6240

This image from the Hubble Space Telescope shows NGC 6240, the result of a three-galaxy merger that contains three nuclei, two of which appear to have active supermassive black holes. [NASA, ESA, the Hubble Heritage (STScI/AURA)-ESA/Hubble Collaboration, and A. Evans (University of Virginia, Charlottesville/NRAO/Stony Brook University)]

When galaxies merge, the supermassive black holes at their centers are thought to link up in a binary system and eventually merge as well. Evidence for these supermassive black hole pairs and their collisions is piling up: researchers have identified a small but growing number of galaxies containing two accreting supermassive black holes, and the compelling evidence for the gravitational wave background points to the existence of an immense population of supermassive black hole binaries.

With observational evidence for supermassive black hole mergers taking shape, theorists are exploring the details of these mergers. One aspect of this process that hasn’t yet been examined fully is how the relative inclination of the merging galaxies impacts the time it takes for their central black holes to merge — a factor that has the potential to shape the demographics of merging supermassive black holes across our universe.

Ready, Set, Spiral

Sena Ghobadi (Georgia Institute of Technology) and collaborators used 3D dynamical models to explore how the angle at which galaxies collide — and therefore how the black holes’ orbits are tilted relative to one another — impacts the time it takes the supermassive black holes at their centers to merge.

In the simulations, Ghobadi’s team placed a 106–108-solar-mass black hole at the center of a disk galaxy. Then, they sent a second, smaller black hole spiraling toward it from a distance of 1 kiloparsec (3,300 light-years).

The team varied the inclination of the incoming black hole’s orbit relative to the disk of the target galaxy from 0 to 75 degrees. They also explored the impact of changing the black hole masses and the galaxy’s central gas density, disk rotation speed, and gas mass fraction. For each simulation, they recorded how long it took for the incoming smaller black hole to get within 10 parsecs of the larger black hole.

simulated black hole orbits

Simulated orbits of black holes with initial inclinations of 0 (top), 25 (center), and 45 (bottom) degrees. For the 0-degree simulation, the black holes merge in 5.75 billion years. For the 25-degree simulation, the merger occurs at 7.90 billion years. The 45-degree simulation fails to merge within the lifetime of the universe. [Adapted from Ghobadi et al. 2026]

(Dis)inclined to Merge

The simulations showed a clear trend with changing inclination: a black hole with an orbital inclination greater than 20 degrees took longer to merge than those with inclinations of 0–20 degrees. For black holes approaching the merger on slightly inclined orbits, dynamical friction between the black hole and the stars and gas of the galaxy worked to drag the black hole down into the disk, decreasing its inclination over time and guiding it toward a merger. Aside from the influence of inclination, the team also found that higher-mass supermassive black holes and more rapidly rotating galactic disks tended to lead to faster mergers.

For inclinations greater than roughly 45 degrees, a dramatic transition took place, with the orbits of the incoming black holes becoming more inclined over time rather than settling down into the disk. These simulated black holes failed to merge in the allotted time of 14 billion years.

With highly inclined binaries failing to merge within the lifetime of the universe, this suggests that the dual active galactic nuclei and the supermassive black hole binaries that produce gravitational waves in the universe today are the result of binaries with initial inclinations of 20 degrees or less.

Citation

“Evolution of Supermassive Black Hole Pairs on Inclined Orbits in Postmerger Galaxies,” Sena Ghobadi et al 2026 ApJ 999 131. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ae40bc

The post How Tilted Orbits Impact Supermassive Black Hole Collisions appeared first on AAS Nova.

Signs of a Supermassive Black Hole Merger in NGC 4486B

6 April 2026 at 17:00

merging galaxies

The galaxy NGC 4486B appears calm and collected, but its center may have been roiled by a recent merger of supermassive black holes. New modeling explores the stellar dynamics that support this hypothesis.

Strange Center

NGC 4486B double nucleus

Kinematic maps of NGC 4486B showing the locations of the two peaks of its double nucleus. Click to enlarge. [Adapted from Tahmasebzadeh et al. 2026]

Astronomers have known for 30 years that NGC 4486B, a compact elliptical galaxy near the center of the Virgo cluster, has a double nucleus. More recently, JWST observations revealed that the galaxy houses a black hole of 360 million solar masses, which is unusually large compared to the galaxy’s stellar mass of 9 billion solar masses. The two nuclei are roughly 40 light-years from the apparent center of the galaxy, and the black hole also appears to be offset from the galactic center by 20 light-years.

Now, a team led by Behzad Tahmasebzadeh (University of Michigan; Villanova University) has investigated the possibility that NGC 4486B’s double nucleus and off-center black hole can be traced to the aftermath of a supermassive black hole merger.

Simulating Kinematics

In this scenario, the black hole is displaced from the galaxy’s center because of a “kick” it received when it underwent a merger. The double nucleus is a sign of an eccentric nuclear disk: a central disk of stars on aligned elliptical orbits created when merging supermassive black holes disturb an initially orderly disk of stars.

plot of kick magnitude versus mass ratio

Estimated black hole kick magnitude as a function of the initial mass ratio of the black hole binary. Click to enlarge. [Tahmasebzadeh et al. 2026]

Tahmasebzadeh and collaborators performed dynamical modeling to test this hypothesis and understand what types of stellar orbits would be necessary to reproduce the kinematic signature of NGC 4486B’s center seen with JWST. The simulation results called for a blend of prograde and retrograde stellar orbits that closely resembled what is expected for an eccentric nuclear disk. From the properties of the simulated stellar disk, the team estimated that the mass ratio of the merging black holes was >0.15.

To explore this scenario further, the team carried out N-body simulations of the post-merger black hole’s behavior. These simulations showed that after being booted from the galactic center by the post-merger kick, the black hole returns to the center quickly — within 10–80 million years, depending on the kick strength. Because NGC 4486B’s supermassive black hole is notably off center, this suggests that the merger occurred recently.

Galaxy Merger Versus Black Hole Merger

Tahmasebzadeh’s team tested two other theories that could explain the appearance of NGC 4486B’s nucleus: dynamical buoyancy and a pre-merger supermassive black hole binary. Neither of these scenarios could reproduce the offsets seen in the center of the galaxy.

The team noted that NGC 4486B appears to be in equilibrium, with no sign of a recent merger that could have plunked a second supermassive black hole into the galaxy. How can this fact be reconciled with the evidence for a recent black hole merger? Turning again to simulations, the team found that if the black hole binary’s orbit was aligned with the galaxy’s rotation, the binary could have become trapped in a resonance that greatly delayed the merger of the black holes. This makes it possible that NGC 4486B underwent a galaxy merger in the distant past, but its central black hole merged only recently, leaving signs of a long-ago merger that has otherwise faded from view.

Citation

“JWST Observations of the Double Nucleus in NGC 4486B: Possible Evidence for a Recent Binary SMBH Merger and Recoil,” Behzad Tahmasebzadeh et al 2026 ApJL 1001 L14. doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ae52ef

The post Signs of a Supermassive Black Hole Merger in NGC 4486B appeared first on AAS Nova.

Triple Double: Do Merging White Dwarfs Produce Fast Radio Burst–Emitting Remnants?

24 March 2026 at 16:00

Illustration of two white dwarfs about to merge

Editor’s Note: Astrobites is a graduate-student-run organization that digests astrophysical literature for undergraduate students. As part of the partnership between the AAS and astrobites, we occasionally repost astrobites content here at AAS Nova. We hope you enjoy this post from astrobites; the original can be viewed at astrobites.org.

Title: Fast Radio Bursts from White Dwarf Binary Mergers: Isolated and Triple-Induced Channels
Authors: Cheyanne Shariat et al.
First Author’s Institution: California Institute of Technology
Status: Published in ApJL

The History of Fast Radio Bursts

Since the discovery of the Lorimer Burst in 2007, astronomers have studied fast radio bursts (FRBs) in extreme detail. However, these extragalactic millisecond-duration radio transients have remained an enigma. Like many astrophysical phenomena, their discovery was serendipitous. The most prolific FRB-discovery instrument, CHIME, was not originally built to study them; the acronym stands for “Canadian Hydrogen Intensity Mapping Experiment,” reflecting its original (and ongoing) mission to map the cosmological distribution of hydrogen in the primordial universe. Since its construction, CHIME has discovered several thousand FRBs and even identified a smaller fraction that are known to repeat, some with consistent periods and others that are sporadic and seemingly random. (Check out their live catalog of repeating sources.)

Despite having thousands of sources to study, the only thing we know fairly confidently about FRBs is that many of them are extragalactic, and some others are even at cosmological distances. If we don’t understand how FRBs are produced, how can we know their distance? FRBs display a unique signature in their radio spectra, where higher frequencies arrive at the telescope first and lower frequencies arrive later, delayed by an inverse frequency-squared relationship. In a “dynamic spectrum,” this makes the pulse actually appear like a sweep from high to low frequency that follows the shape of a parabola; for example, the brightest pixels in Figure 1 of this Bite display this sweeping shape. This effect results from the FRB propagating through an ionized plasma with a specific density. Since the FRB is ultimately an electromagnetic wave, this slows down the speed of the FRB as a function of frequency. Measuring this effect, called dispersion, allows us to infer that the FRB signal passed through more plasma than can be accounted for within our own Milky Way galaxy, indicating that the FRB must have originated from much farther away. So far, there is only one example of an FRB from within our own galaxy, which was identified as originating from a magnetar, a highly magnetic pulsar.

FRB Progenitor Candidates

Although we know that most FRBs are located at extragalactic or even cosmological distances, it’s still not clear what objects that can generate them. Since magnetars and other compact objects are often considered reliable progenitors of FRBs, understanding their populations and comparing them with observed FRBs may reveal the origin of FRBs. Candidate FRB progenitor systems are usually divided into “prompt” channels — like the collapse of a star into a magnetar during a core-collapse supernova — and “delayed” channels where the FRB engine is formed on longer timescales, like accretion-induced collapse of white dwarfs or compact-object mergers. Figure 1 displays several of these channels, particularly those considered in today’s article, in which stellar evolution results in the transfer of material from one star to another (accretion-induced collapse) or gravitational radiation allows two objects to inspiral and merge. These events could create highly magnetized white dwarfs or magnetars that may produce FRBs.

different pathways and their associated fractions for producing an FRB candidate

Figure 1: Three different pathways and their associated fractions for producing an FRB candidate. Depending on the mass and composition of the merging objects, an FRB candidate may be produced instead of causing the white dwarf to explode in a Type Ia supernova. These are the systems of interest in today’s article. [Shariat et al. 2026]

Simulating Hierarchical Triples

In today’s article, we’re considering the role of hierarchical triple star systems in producing FRB-emitting objects. A hierarchical triple consists of an inner binary and a distant, tertiary star; see the first panel of Figure 1. These systems may play an important role because many stars that become white dwarfs of at least 0.8 solar mass exist in hierarchical triples: 35% of 2-solar-mass stars and 50% of 8-solar-mass stars are in triples. Stars of both masses will end their lives as white dwarfs.

The tertiary star plays an essential role in increasing the likelihood of the inner binary interacting: the eccentric Kozai–Lidov (EKL) mechanism causes the inner orbit to oscillate between highly inclined (with respect to the orbit of the tertiary star) and highly eccentric. Unlike isolated binaries that aren’t excited in this way, the eccentric orbit phase causes the inner stars to pass much closer to each other, increasing the likelihood of interaction or even a merger that could produce an FRB-emitting remnant.

The authors of today’s article produced a realistic population of triple systems by sampling from empirically measured distributions of masses, periods, and orbital eccentricities. These distributions were derived from observations collected by the Gaia satellite, an all-sky optical telescope that has now observed more than one billion stars in the Milky Way. The authors also created a “control” sample of isolated binaries by removing the tertiary star from the same sample of systems. The systems were then evolved for an age randomly selected between 0 and 12.5 billion years to simulate “constant” star formation similar to that in the Milky Way. Finally, they reapply these simulations at three different “metallicities” — the fraction of elements other than hydrogen or helium relative to that of the Sun.

Figure 2 displays these two populations: the isolated binaries are shown as filled histograms, and the hierarchical triples are shown as histograms with dashed lines. Each column represents the three different progenitor classes considered in Figure 1. At solar metallicity, the delays to merging are greater in triples than in secular binaries, leading to more mergers overall (top left panel). At lower metallicities, there are fewer mergers in all progenitor pathways in triples than in isolated binaries due to changes in stellar evolution attributed to weaker winds and larger pre-white dwarf masses.

mergers as a function of time for different metallicities and formation pathways

Figure 2: The number of mergers as a function of time from the hierarchical triple’s formation, given different three metallicities (rows) and the three primary formation pathways for FRB-emitting merged remnants considered in Figure 1. Filled histograms are isolated binaries, dashed histograms are triples. [Shariat et al. 2026]

A Cosmic Population of FRBs

Since we can’t realistically track individual star systems from their formation to the end, we need to convert the delay-time distributions shown in Figure 2 to an observable. To do this, the authors combine the results of their simulations with measurements of the cosmic star formation rate — how many stars form per unit time as a function of the universe’s age — and the evolution of the universe’s metallicity as stars fuse hydrogen into heavier elements and return this material to the interstellar medium as these stars end their lives in shedding red giants or supernovae. This analysis produces the number of FRBs that should be observed as a function of distance or lookback time into the universe’s history, which is displayed in Figure 3.

number of FRBs expected as a function of cosmological redshift

Figure 3: The number of FRBs expected as a function of cosmological redshift. The present is to the left, the distant and early universe is on the right. The top panel shows the three formation channels, with binary and triple systems separated. The bottom panel displays the composite rate and compares it with empirical estimates from existing FRB observations. [Shariat et al. 2026]

This analysis reveals key measurable differences between lone binaries and hierarchical triples: most notably, binary white dwarf mergers peak later in the universe (redshift of z ~ 1), while single binaries peak earlier (redshift of z ~ 2). These results highlight the importance of including triples in FRB progenitors because they are more likely to contribute to populations at later times — making them closer and more easily detectable — in the total population of FRBs. Future instruments like CHIME with the new outriggers and the Deep Synoptic Array will expand the sample of FRBs to reach farther cosmological distances, with better localizations, enabling more statistically motivated tests of different formation pathways.

Original astrobite edited by Catherine Slaughter.

About the author, Will Golay:

I am a graduate student in the Department of Astronomy at Harvard University and the Center for Astrophysics | Harvard & Smithsonian, advised by Edo Berger. I study radio emission from transient astrophysical objects like tidal disruption events.

The post Triple Double: Do Merging White Dwarfs Produce Fast Radio Burst–Emitting Remnants? appeared first on AAS Nova.

Featured Image: An Active Galaxy Cluster Merger at Cosmic Noon

23 March 2026 at 16:00

This image from JWST shows the galaxy cluster XLSSU J021744.1-034536. The cluster is at a redshift of z = 1.98, placing it at cosmic noon, when the universe’s star formation was at its peak. To study the formation and evolution of this cluster, Zachary Scofield (Yonsei University) and collaborators collected wide-ranging clues, including signs of weak gravitational lensing, the glow of gas in between the galaxies of the cluster, and an analysis of the cluster members. The image above (click for the full view) indicates the galaxies that are members of the cluster. The brightest galaxy in the cluster is marked with a yellow square, and the remaining cluster members are circled, with the color indicating whether the galaxy’s cluster membership was assigned photometrically (magenta) or spectroscopically (green). Combining all available lines of evidence, Scofield’s team found that XLSSU J021744.1-034536 is undergoing a merger, giving a rare glimpse into this stage of cluster formation. To learn more about this work and what it tells us about galaxy clusters at cosmic noon, be sure to check out the full article linked below.

Citation

“An Active Galaxy Cluster Merger at Cosmic Noon Revealed by JWST Weak Lensing and Multiwavelength Probes,” Zachary P. Scofield et al 2026 ApJL 999 L1. doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ae447a

The post Featured Image: An Active Galaxy Cluster Merger at Cosmic Noon appeared first on AAS Nova.

Selections from 2025: The Nine-Ringed Bullseye Galaxy

23 December 2025 at 17:00

Bullseye galaxy

Editor’s Note: For the remainder of 2025, we’ll be looking at a few selections that we haven’t yet discussed on AAS Nova from among the most-downloaded articles published in AAS journals this year. The usual posting schedule will resume January 2nd.

The Bullseye: HST, Keck/KCWI, and Dragonfly Characterization of a Giant Nine-ringed Galaxy

Published February 2025

Main takeaway:

Bullseye galaxy rings

Red ellipses overplotted on the first eight rings identified with Hubble in the Bullseye galaxy. Click to enlarge. [Pasha et al 2025]

Using a combination of the Hubble Space Telescope, the Dragonfly Telephoto Array, and the Keck Cosmic Web Imager, Imad Pasha (Yale University) and collaborators discovered and performed deep follow-up observations of a giant collisional ring galaxy aptly nicknamed the “Bullseye” galaxy (LEDA 1313424). The team identified a staggering nine rings in the Bullseye with a likely tenth that has since faded — the most rings found in any collisional ring galaxy to date. The rings are a result of a small blue dwarf galaxy shooting through the Bullseye’s core about 50 million years ago, sending ripples through the galaxy.

Why it’s interesting:

Galaxy mergers and interactions are commonplace in the universe, but it is very rare for a dwarf galaxy to strike right through a large galaxy’s core. When this does happen, the collision sends shock waves through the impaled galaxy, sweeping gas and dust outward and forming rings where star formation can occur (hence the name, collisional ring galaxy). These galaxies are valuable sites to explore galactic structure and evolution as well as provide a unique case to study galaxy mergers and interactions. Previously discovered collisional ring galaxies have at most two or three rings, so when Pasha and collaborators found the stunning nine in the Bullseye, it was clear they caught something significant.

Catching the Bullseye at a lucky time in its evolution:

Why does the Bullseye have so many rings? Theoretical studies of these head-on collisions predict that many rings will form and travel outward after the initial crash; however, the rings tend to dissolve after only a few hundred million years. Catching this collision only 50 million years after it happened means we are witnessing the earlier stages of the Bullseye’s evolution. This lucky discovery not only confirms theoretical predictions for collisional ring galaxies, it also may be a clue to how another unique galaxy type, giant low-surface brightness galaxies, originate. Given the wispy ring material found at very large radii from the Bullseye, the authors suggested that collisional ring galaxies may evolve into giant low-surface brightness galaxies as they expand outward and fade. Further investigation and a larger sample of collisional ring galaxies are necessary to confirm this hypothesis, but the Bullseye provides interesting and critical observational evidence of these predictions for the first time.

Citation

Imad Pasha et al 2025 ApJL 980 L3. doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ad9f5c

The post Selections from 2025: The Nine-Ringed Bullseye Galaxy appeared first on AAS Nova.

Boosting the Gravitational Wave Background

3 December 2025 at 17:00

Simulation of a supermassive black hole binary

The gravitational wave background — the constant, low-frequency hum of colliding supermassive black holes across the universe — seems to have a larger amplitude than expected. Can preferential accretion explain why?

Larger than Expected

Arp 122

The peculiar galaxy Arp 122, shown here in a Hubble Space Telescope image, is in the process of merging. When two galaxies merge, the supermassive black holes at their centers eventually merge as well. [ESA/Hubble & NASA, J. Dalcanton, Dark Energy Survey/DOE/FNAL/DECam/CTIO/NOIRLab/NSF/AURA; Acknowledgement: L. Shatz; CC BY 4.0]

In 2023, researchers announced the discovery of compelling evidence for the gravitational wave background: a low-frequency, low-amplitude signal that is likely due to supermassive black hole binaries across the universe steadily trundling toward mergers. The amplitude of the background, however, is larger than expected for a population of merging supermassive black holes.

Though some researchers have invoked new physics to explain this discrepancy, all that may be required is an adjustment to our understanding of the supermassive black hole binary population in our universe. In a recent research article, Julia Comerford (University of Colorado Boulder) and Joseph Simon (University of Colorado Boulder; Oregon State University) tackled one of the underlying assumptions about the masses of merging supermassive black holes.

Preferential Accretion Pathway

When supermassive black holes merge, the strength of the gravitational wave signal depends on how similar the black holes were in mass; merging equal-mass black holes produce stronger signals than mismatched black holes do. What if, Comerford and Simon proposed, the masses of merging supermassive black holes scattered across the universe are more similar than previously thought?

initial and final black hole mass ratios

The initial and final black hole mass ratio, q. The blue and orange lines show a 10% and 20% increase in the total mass of the binary, respectively. The dotted line divides major mergers (q ≥ 0.25) and minor mergers. [Comerford & Simon 2025]

Observations and simulations of supermassive black holes within colliding galaxies appear to support this hypothesis. Rather than staying the same mass as they approach one another, as models tend to assume, supermassive black holes likely gather material from their surroundings and gain mass.

What’s more, it appears that the smaller of the two black holes tends to pack on more mass, meaning that the masses of the black holes grow more similar as they wind toward a merger. (This somewhat counterintuitive result arises because the smaller of the two black holes encounters more gas as it spirals inward.)

Boosting the Signal

If accretion tends to even out the masses of the binary members, is the resulting increase in signal strength large enough to explain the observed amplitude of the gravitational wave background?

plot of estimated gravitational wave amplitude

Probability distribution functions for the calculated gravitational wave background amplitude for different accretion conditions. The brown diamond shows the median amplitude from the NANOGrav data set. [Adapted from Comerford & Simon 2025]

Comerford and Simon modeled the gravitational wave background from supermassive black hole binaries undergoing preferential accretion onto the smaller black hole. Benchmarking their model with observations wherever possible, they found that just a 10% increase in the total mass of the merging black holes can raise the gravitational wave background to the median observed value — easing the discrepancy without the need for speculative new physics.

The signal-boosting effect from preferential accretion may be especially important if the binary evolution timescale — the time it takes for black holes approaching a merger to reach a separation at which their gravitational waves become accessible to pulsar timing arrays — is longer than the estimated 1.8 billion years. At longer timescales, models without this accretion become entirely inconsistent with observations. Future research that examines the masses and accretion rates of supermassive black holes as they approach make their way toward a merger can provide further clues to the role of preferential accretion.

Citation

“Preferential Accretion onto the Secondary Black Hole Strengthens Gravitational-Wave Signals,” Julia M. Comerford and Joseph Simon 2025 ApJ 994 168. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ae1133

The post Boosting the Gravitational Wave Background appeared first on AAS Nova.

Black Holes with a Shared Background

19 November 2025 at 17:00

A rendering of three white stars, two of which are very close together.

What if there was one process capable of creating every type of detectable stellar-mass black hole system? Recent research suggests there might be, and that it involves a triple-star system.

Three Separate Contexts

Stellar-mass black holes, or black holes that are at most a few hundred times the mass of the Sun, pop up in a number of different environments in the Milky Way. Astronomers have known since the 1960s that these black holes are the engines behind accreting low-mass X-ray binaries; more recently, researchers at gravitational wave observatories such as LIGO have found pairs of black holes orbiting each other just prior to merging; and, in just the past few years, scientists using the Gaia spacecraft have found black holes on wide, prowling orbits around still-burning stars.

A photograph of a patch of the night sky with two nested purple ovals overlaid.

An illustration of the first black hole discovered with a star on a wide orbit. The black hole moves along the smaller inner ellipse, while its companion star orbits along the wider outer one. [ESA/Gaia/DPAC]

Although each of these scenarios involves a black hole, it’s unclear how exactly these black holes are related to one another, or if they’re related at all. For instance, do low-mass X-ray binaries form the same way as the binary black holes observed with LIGO? Are the wide star–black hole binaries discovered by Gaia destined to eventually merge as two black holes, or are they a separate population altogether?

Recent research led by Smadar Naoz (University of California, Los Angeles) offers a potential answer to this question of relatedness — that each of these situations forms through the same underlying process.

Triples Systems

An illustration of multiple stars evolving along different pathways indicated by arrows.

A schematic illustration of how triple-star systems can produce all three types of observable stellar-mass black hole systems. Click to enlarge. [Naoz et al. 2025]

The mechanism Naoz and collaborators describe would work as follows. First, three stars begin their lives all bound together via gravity. Two of these stars orbit each other fairly closely, but the third hangs back much farther away. After the two inner stars burn out and collapse into black holes, they undergo the kind of collision commonly observed by LIGO and merge together. This process gives the resulting larger black hole a “kick,” meaning it goes flying off away from the site of the impact with some new velocity.

What happens next depends on the geometry of the system and the direction of the kick. If the remnant black hole gets shot away from the third star, it might just drift off on its own and leave the star behind. If the kick isn’t too strong, the remnant will remain gravitationally bound to that third star, and the system will eventually look like the star–black hole pairs observed by Gaia. Finally, if the kick sends the remnant toward the third star, some dramatic outcomes become possible: either the black hole starts nibbling on the star and the system becomes a low-mass X-ray binary, or the black hole simply smashes into the star, destroying it completely in a large, flashy explosion paired with a gravitational wave signal.

The authors stress that this mechanism is almost certainly not the only way that these three stellar-mass black hole systems form. However, it is exciting to consider a common thread underlying such seemingly different scenarios, and with upgrades coming to gravitational wave observatories, we can hope for tests of its feasibility in the near future.

Citation

“Triples as Links Between Binary Black Hole Mergers, Their Electromagnetic Counterparts, and Galactic Black Holes,” Smadar Naoz et al 2025 ApJL 992 L12. doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ae0a20

The post Black Holes with a Shared Background appeared first on AAS Nova.

A Black Hole Family Tree

31 October 2025 at 16:20

A rendering of two dark spheres surrounded by bright, misaligned disks drawing near to one another.

Black holes can have messy family histories, and a recent massive merger challenged astronomers to sort out just how many generations of black holes were involved in the event. Recent research, however, may have untangled the lineages of the two progenitors.

A Massive Collision

Earlier this year, the Laser Interferometer Gravitational-Wave Observatory (LIGO) detected the ripples in spacetime caused by the merger of two black holes somewhere in the distant universe. Though these detections have become increasingly common, this one in particular stood out among the more than 200 reported over the last decade. Named GW231123, this event must have caused more of a splash than a ripple since the two black holes that slammed together were unusually massive; both likely weighed more than 100 times the mass of the Sun. Not only that, each was also spinning unusually rapidly prior to the collision.

A photograph of two perpendicular straight lines that cut through a forest and meet at a complex of buildings in a clearing.

LIGO Livingston, one of the two LIGO detectors. [Caltech/MIT/LIGO Lab]

According to theory, black holes this large are not supposed to form on their own. When massive stars die, they can collapse into a black hole; but, when really massive stars die, the collapse is so violent that no material is left over to form the black hole. So, when researchers first measured the masses of the black holes involved in GW231123, they knew that the black holes involved couldn’t have formed directly from collapsed stars. Instead, they were likely second-generation black holes, meaning that they themselves formed from previous black hole–black hole mergers.

Merger Mystery

This result was celebrated as evidence of so-called “hierarchical formation,” in which black holes formed in dense environments swarm throughout their star clusters, merging with other black holes they encounter and growing ever larger.

However, there were a couple of complications with this picture. For one, theory predicts that it is challenging to form such rapidly spinning black holes from randomly oriented progenitors, since usually the spins wash out and leave the remnant rotating slowly. For another, the merging process tends to give the final black hole a “kick” that sends it flying rapidly away from the site of the impact, occasionally fast enough to leave the star cluster altogether, meaning second-generation black holes might not be able to merge into subsequent generations.

A multi-panel cartoon showing black holes merging through various combinations of 1st, 2nd, and 3rd generation black holes.

A schematic of various potential black hole family trees. The binary-star origin scenario is shown in the green box. Click to enlarge. [Stegmann et al. 2025]

Born as a Pair

New research led by Jakob Stegmann, Max Planck Institute for Astrophysics, suggests a way around each of these problems. In the team’s model, the two black holes involved in the GW231123 merger didn’t form from isolated black holes in a cluster, but rather from binary stars embedded within that cluster. In this picture, two massive stars were born bound together, orbiting one another within a larger cluster of stars. Crucially for this scenario, the massive primordial stars have aligned spins — an expected outcome of massive binary star evolution.

After both stars in the binary collapsed into black holes, these black holes merged to form a rapidly spinning second-generation black hole. This second-generation black hole eventually encountered another black hole within the cluster and merged to produce the ripples in spacetime we observed as GW231123.

Since black holes born within binary systems are expected to have smaller kicks and faster spins, this scenario neatly explains the properties observed in GW231123. As LIGO keeps listening for more black hole mergers, hopefully similar events will provide more chances to untangle their complex family trees.

Citation

“Resolving Black Hole Family Issues Among the Massive Ancestors of Very High-Spin Gravitational-Wave Events like GW231123,” Jakob Stegmann et al 2025 ApJL 992 L226. doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ae0e5f

The post A Black Hole Family Tree appeared first on AAS Nova.

Not Their First Rodeo: Gravitational Wave Detectors Spot Merging Black Holes That Have Merged Before

28 October 2025 at 16:00

gravitational wave illustration

Meet GW241011 and GW241101, two events from the fourth observing run of the LIGO, Virgo, and KAGRA (LVK) gravitational wave detectors. With rapid spins and mismatched black hole masses, both events provide strong evidence for black hole growth through hierarchical mergers.

"masses in the stellar graveyard"

Masses of black holes and neutron stars discovered via gravitational waves (blue and orange circles). The red and yellow circles show the black holes and neutron stars detected through electromagnetic means. Click to enlarge. [LVK/A. Geller/Northwestern]

A Decade of Discovery

Humanity is 10 years into its study of the gravitational wave universe, and detectors across the globe are about to wrap up their fourth observing run. The recently released fourth catalog of gravitational wave transients, GWTC-4.0, more than doubles the number of recorded events.

Today, we’re taking a look at two of the fourth observing run’s gravitational wave events, both of which point to black holes born in dense environments.

Two Detections in the Spotlight

GW241011 and GW241101 are gravitational wave signals that reached Earth in late 2024. Using Bayesian parameter estimation, members of the LVK collaboration determined that each of these two signals arose from the merger of a pair of black holes.

plot of posterior spin distributions

Posterior distributions for the primary black hole’s spin magnitude for GW241011 (left) and GW241101 (right). [LIGO, Virgo, and KAGRA Collaborations 2025]

Though the LVK detectors have by now spotted dozens of coalescing black hole pairs, these two detections stand out. GW241011 is the third-loudest gravitational wave signal ever detected, and its primary (i.e., more massive) black hole has one of the largest and most precisely measured spins among black holes detected via gravitational waves.

GW241101 flips the script: its primary black hole also spins rapidly, but it appears to do so in a direction opposite from the direction in which the black holes orbit. Though its spin isn’t measured as precisely as that of the primary black hole in GW241011, this event still provides the best evidence so far that the spins of some merging black holes are misaligned with their orbital motion.

In addition to their standout spin parameters, these events are also remarkable for the masses involved. In both cases, the larger black hole has a mass of 15–20 solar masses, and the smaller black hole is significantly smaller — about 6 solar masses for GW241011 and 8 solar masses for GW241101.

A Black Hole Genealogy Project

Inferred masses and spins of the ancestors of the primary black holes of GW241011 and GW241101

Inferred masses and spins of the ancestors of the primary black holes of GW241011 and GW241101. Click to enlarge. [LIGO, Virgo, and KAGRA Collaborations 2025]

The rapid spins and comparatively large masses of the primary black holes of GW241011 and GW241101 don’t line up with what’s expected for black holes arising in isolated binary systems, unsubjected to outside influences. But they do match expectations for hierarchical mergers, in which one or more of the black holes involved is itself the product of a merger.

If these signals arose from hierarchical mergers, that tells us something about the environment in which the black holes lived. When two black holes merge, the product is expected to spin rapidly and receive a “kick.” For a black hole pair in a loose grouping of stars, this kick would likely boot the merger product out of the group, preventing it from encountering other black holes and merging again.

But in dense environments like compact star clusters, even a good strong kick isn’t enough to overcome the cluster’s escape velocity and launch the resulting black hole on a lonely journey through space. Instead, these black holes are retained in the dense cluster environments of their birth, where they may dance and merge with another black hole partner. While it’s not possible to entirely rule out other origins, such as an isolated pair of massive binary stars, the data strongly support the hierarchical merger scenario.

This discovery yet again demonstrates the ability of our gravitational wave detectors to reveal the lives and histories of black holes throughout our universe. Stay tuned for even more black hole news from the current observing run!

Citation

GW241011 and GW241110: Exploring Binary Formation and Fundamental Physics with Asymmetric, High-Spin Black Hole Coalescences,” A. G. Abac et al 2025 ApJL 993 L21. doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ae0d54

The post Not Their First Rodeo: Gravitational Wave Detectors Spot Merging Black Holes That Have Merged Before appeared first on AAS Nova.

Following Up on Flares: Can We Spot Black Hole Mergers in Active Galactic Nucleus Disks?

20 October 2025 at 17:00

Illustration of stellar-mass black holes embedded within the accretion disk of a supermassive black hole

Editor’s Note: Astrobites is a graduate-student-run organization that digests astrophysical literature for undergraduate students. As part of the partnership between the AAS and astrobites, we occasionally repost astrobites content here at AAS Nova. We hope you enjoy this post from astrobites; the original can be viewed at astrobites.org.

Title: Tracing the Light: Identification for the Optical Counterpart Candidates of Binary Black Holes During O3
Authors: Lei He et al.
First Author’s Institution: University of Science and Technology of China
Status: Published in ApJ

Since the first detection of gravitational waves about a decade ago, gravitational wave science has been the gift that keeps on giving (for example, check out GW231123, announced earlier this year). It is also a field where more questions with unknown answers just keep coming. A key question at the forefront of gravitational wave science is about formation channels: how does the population of black holes seen through the LIGO–Virgo–KAGRA (LVK) detectors form? The two most popular of these formation channels are the “isolated binary” channel, wherein two stars of a binary stellar system each form black holes that then merge, and the “dynamical” formation channel, wherein two stars in a dense stellar cluster (usually a nuclear star cluster) become black holes and merge just through chance and the denseness of the environment they are in.

More recently, a third channel has been gaining popularity: the active galactic nucleus (AGN) disk channel. An AGN disk is a large disk of hot gas that surrounds a supermassive black hole in the center of a galaxy. The disk helps address two potential issues with stellar-mass binary black hole mergers that could pose a problem for the other two formation channels: delay time and mass. The delay time is the time between when the binary system forms and when the two black holes merge. By putting the system into the denser gaseous environment of an AGN disk, the orbits of the black holes decay faster, allowing the merger to happen on a quicker timescale. Regarding mass, the LVK detectors have detected mergers with masses above what would be expected from stellar-mass black holes alone, the so-called “lite” intermediate-mass black holes. One potential avenue through which these “lite” intermediate-mass black holes may form is in the gaseous disks of AGNs, where they can accrete material and gain mass before merging.

One potential astronomical benefit of a binary black hole merger happening inside the gaseous disk of an AGN is that the merger could disturb this disk and spark a flare of light. If we could spot such a flare and tie it to a gravitational wave event, we would then have both gravitational wave and electromagnetic observations of the same event. Prior research has suggested that some AGN flares detected by the Zwicky Transient Facility (ZTF) might be linked to binary black hole mergers observed during LIGO–Virgo’s third observing run. Today’s authors revisit this possibility by using additional years of data from ZTF combined with the public data through the third observing run.

The authors re-analyzed seven candidate flare–gravitational wave pairs originally flagged during the third observing run (see Figure 1). They examined each AGN’s long-term light curve from data from ZTF, looking for repeated flaring that might indicate a variable AGN rather than a one-time merger-driven flare. Using a Bayesian framework and an approach called Gaussian processes, they calculated the probability that each optical flare was physically connected to a specific gravitational wave event, considering both the spatial and temporal alignment of each of the two signals. Their framework allowed them to calculate a value they dub pflare, which is the probability that a given flare is indeed a genuine flare rather than a characteristic of the variability intrinsic to the AGN itself.

Sky localization of the seven AGN systems analyzed in this work

Figure 1: Sky localization of the seven AGN systems analyzed in this work. Red stars represent the locations of the AGNs with suspected flares, and colored lines represent the nine potential gravitational wave events that may be associated with each AGN flare. The white/black background represents the density of the distribution of AGNs in the Million Quasar Catalog. [He et al. 2025]

After analyzing the updated data, only two of the original seven flare candidates remained consistent with being merger-driven events, as the two associated AGNs showed no additional flares for three years after the initial brightening, suggesting that their activity was not just normal AGN variability.

The authors take this result one step further. One primary application of combining gravitational wave and electromagnetic signals is an independent measurement of the Hubble constant. The most straightforward way to measure the Hubble constant is to measure both the recessional velocity and the distance to a single source. Multi-messenger astronomy provides a straightforward approach to this, as the redshift can be determined from electromagnetic observations and the distance from gravitational wave observations. (GW170817 is a notable example of this.)

The authors show how this could be applied to their data using flares. They use the two most promising flare–gravitational wave associations to derive a new estimate of the Hubble constant. By combining the distance inferred from the gravitational wave signal with the redshift of the AGN host galaxy, they obtained a value of the Hubble constant of about 72 kilometers per second per megaparsec (roughly the peak of the green dotted curve on the bottom of Figure 2). This result is consistent with other measurements of the Hubble constant, which are the local distance-ladder measurements from supernovae and the cosmic microwave background estimates from Planck (the two measurements that are often cited as being in tension). The uncertainty from the author’s analysis is still quite large, but it provides a proof of concept. When they included the well-known GW170817 neutron star merger, they obtained a result that is slightly more informative and slightly greater than the result from GW170817 alone.

plot showing constraints on the Hubble constant from multiple methods

Figure 2: Constraints on the Hubble constant using multiple methods. For both figures, the x-axis represents the inferred value of the Hubble constant, and the y-axis represents the posterior probability of that value using hierarchical Bayesian analyses (for gravitational wave analyses). The vertical orange bands represent the measured value of the Hubble constant with five standard deviations of certainty using the “distance ladder” method as reported by the SH0ES collaboration. The vertical blue bands represent the measured value of the Hubble constant with five standard deviations of certainty by using measurements of the cosmic microwave background with the Planck spacecraft. The dotted black curve (both left and right) represents the posterior distribution of the Hubble constant as measured by the LVK collaboration from the first binary neutron star multi-messenger source, GW170817 (which peaks directly between the other two measurements). The purple and red curves (left) represent the posterior distributions of the two confident AGN/binary black hole pairs in this work, the green curve (right) represents the combined posterior distribution of the two confident AGN/binary black hole pairs in this work, and the solid purple curve (bottom) represents the combined posterior distribution of the two confident AGN/binary black hole pairs with GW170817. [He et al. 2025]

What makes this work so exciting is that it showcases a method for identifying black hole binaries in AGN disks, and once identified, turning the joint observation of the merger and AGN disk into a new astronomical and cosmological tool! If we can confidently identify a handful of these events, they can be used both to understand binary black hole formation channels and to independently measure cosmological distances, thereby expanding our understanding of the universe. With upcoming surveys like the Vera Rubin Observatory’s Legacy Survey of Space and Time, which will monitor vast numbers of AGNs with greater cadence and depth, the prospects for finding more such events are strong.

Original astrobite edited by Amaya Sinha.

About the author, William Smith:

Bill is a graduate student in the astrophysics program at Vanderbilt University. He studies gravitational wave populations with a focus on how these populations can help inform cosmology as part of the LIGO Scientific Collaboration. Outside of astrophysics, he also enjoys swimming semi-competitively, music and dancing, cooking, and making the academy a better place for people to live and work.

The post Following Up on Flares: Can We Spot Black Hole Mergers in Active Galactic Nucleus Disks? appeared first on AAS Nova.

The Black Hole Tango: Kicks and Spins in Hierarchical Mergers

29 July 2025 at 17:00

Artist's impression of a group of black holes in a globular cluster

Editor’s Note: Astrobites is a graduate-student-run organization that digests astrophysical literature for undergraduate students. As part of the partnership between the AAS and astrobites, we occasionally repost astrobites content here at AAS Nova. We hope you enjoy this post from astrobites; the original can be viewed at astrobites.org.

Title: Gravitational-Wave Kicks Impact Spins of Black Holes from Hierarchical Mergers
Authors: Angela Borchers, Claire S. Ye, and Maya Fishbach
First Author’s Institution: Max Planck Institute for Gravitational Physics
Status: Published in ApJ

The room is large and densely packed. As you twirl across the floor, someone extends their hand, inviting you to dance. The two of you spin around each other, the tension building with every step. As you draw closer and closer, you realize this isn’t a ballroom, and you’re not people. This is outer space, and you and your partner are black holes, spiraling toward one another in one of the most energetic events in the universe: a black hole merger.

In this cosmic dance, black holes in a binary system orbit each other while also spinning around their own axes. Their spins are inherited from the angular momentum of the massive stars that collapsed to form them. After the two black holes merge, the remnant black hole also spins. The final spin depends on the spins of the two merging black holes and the ratio of the mass of the larger black hole to that of the smaller one. The higher the mass ratio, the more the larger black hole dominates the final spin. To quantify how fast black holes spin, physicists use a dimensionless spin parameter that ranges from 0 (not spinning at all) to 1, the maximum allowed by general relativity.

Observing the distribution of black hole spins helps us understand how binary systems form. For example, binaries formed through isolated channels, where the black holes are born and evolve together, are likely to have similar spin magnitudes, and the directions of their spins tend to align with their orbital motion. In contrast, black holes that form separately and later become a pair through dynamic encounters in dense environments typically have randomly oriented spins (see Figure 1). To determine which formation channels are more common, we need accurate predictions of the expected spin distributions for each scenario to compare them directly to merger observations from detectors like LIGO/Virgo or future gravitational-wave observatories.

infographic showing formation channels for black hole binaries

Figure 1: Graphic showing two main formation channels of black hole binaries. [Reproduced with permission from Shanika Galaudage/Space Australia]

In a dense environment, such as a globular cluster, black holes can undergo multiple consecutive mergers, known as hierarchical mergers. With this in mind, we assign “generations” to black holes: first-generation (1G) black holes have never merged, second-generation (2G) black holes are the product of one previous merger, and so on. After several generations, the spin distribution of black holes has been shown to peak at approximately 0.7, independent of the mass ratios and spins of the first-generation binaries. However, studies have often overlooked an important factor that may impact this distribution: recoil kicks.

After a merger, the newly formed black hole receives a “kick” velocity — a shove that sends it moving through space. This happens because gravitational waves carry away linear momentum asymmetrically during the merger, and to conserve momentum, the remnant black hole recoils in the opposite direction. If its kick exceeds the escape velocity of its cluster, the remnant is ejected, making it unlikely to merge again. However, remnants that receive smaller kicks are retained and can go on to merge again, contributing to the spin distribution over multiple generations. The authors of this article study the final spin distribution of black holes that remain within a cluster after forming from hierarchical mergers.

Simulating Binaries in a Globular Cluster

The authors simulate a first-generation population of one million black holes that are assumed to all have the same initial spin, labeled ai. The authors use data from globular cluster simulations to determine the properties of binaries found in dense environments. The final spin, af, and kick velocity of the black holes are calculated using a high-accuracy model of black hole merger remnants. Only black holes with kick velocities less than the escape velocity of typical globular clusters are kept in the population for future mergers. For their analysis across multiple merger generations, the authors test escape velocities of 50, 100, and 200 km/s.

Some initial binary configurations are more likely to produce high kick velocities that could eject the remnant from the cluster. Figure 2 shows that binaries with isotropic (randomly oriented) spins tend to produce larger kicks than those with spins aligned with the orbital motion.

plot of kick velocity as a function of mass ratio

Figure 2: Kick velocity as a function of mass ratio for three types of black hole binaries: ones with random spin directions (blue), ones with spins aligned with the orbital motion (pink), and ones with zero spin (yellow). Each point shows the average from 10,000 simulated binaries, with spin magnitudes up to 0.8. Solid lines show the average kick velocity; shaded regions show the spread. [Borchers et al. 2025]

Spin Distribution of 1G + 1G Mergers

Figure 3 shows the final spin distribution from mergers between two first-generation black holes for different initial spin values. It compares all merger remnants (global population) to those that stay in the cluster (retained population). As expected, the distribution peaks around 0.7 for the global population. However, the peak shifts to higher spin values when only retained remnants are considered.

plot of spin distribution of black hole merger remnants

Figure 3: Spin distribution of 1G+1G merger remnants with different initial spin magnitudes and randomly oriented spins. The dashed lines show the distribution for all remnants, while the solid lines show the distribution for those that remain in the cluster. For the ai = 0.0 case, the vertical line is centered at af = 0.69. [Borchers et al. 2025]

This happens because, as Figure 2 shows, binaries with aligned spins tend to produce lower kick velocities, making them more likely to stay in the cluster. At the same time, aligned spins lead to remnants with higher final spins, so the retained population is biased toward higher spins.

The authors also examine the effect of escape velocity on the spin distribution. Higher escape velocities make the distribution more similar to the global population, while lower escape velocities lead to broader distributions with more support at higher and lower spins.

Spin Distributions of Higher-Generation Mergers

Figure 4 shows how the spin distribution changes over several generations of black hole mergers. As more generations pass, the spin distribution of the retained black holes starts to look quite different from the global one. In particular, it spreads out and shows a broader range of spin values.

plot of probability distribution of final black hole spins

Figure 4: Final spin distribution for different merger generations. The dashed lines show the distribution for all remnants, while the solid lines show the distribution for those that remain in the cluster. [Adapted from Borchers et al. 2025]

The authors also test different starting spin values and escape velocities. While the global spin distribution tends to settle into a consistent shape after a few generations, the authors find that the retained spin distribution does not. Instead, the spin distribution of black holes that stay in the cluster depends on several factors: the binaries’ initial spins and mass ratios, what generation they belong to, and the escape velocity of the cluster. So, there isn’t a single “universal” spin distribution for retained black holes — it changes depending on the environment and merger history.

Hierarchical mergers are considered a pathway to forming intermediate-mass black holes, potentially explaining events like GW190521. Current gravitational-wave detectors are observing more and more black hole mergers, and future detectors will measure their spins more precisely. Accounting for the spin distributions of black holes that remain in clusters rather than the universal distribution will help us better understand and measure how hierarchical mergers contribute to the gravitational-wave population.

Original astrobite edited by Ryan White.

Authored by Viviana Cáceres.

The post The Black Hole Tango: Kicks and Spins in Hierarchical Mergers appeared first on AAS Nova.

A Candidate Direct-Collapse Black Hole in the Infinity Galaxy

15 July 2025 at 16:54

Infinity Galaxy

Researchers have discovered a rare ring-galaxy duo that appears to harbor a supermassive black hole formed through direct collapse — a process similar to what may have jump-started the growth of the first supermassive black holes in the universe.

Searching for Oddballs

To find something remarkable, sometimes you have to go looking for it. As described in an article published today in the Astrophysical Journal Letters, a research team led by Pieter van Dokkum (Yale University; Dragonfly Focused Research Organization) recently struck gold in their search for unusual objects.

Van Dokkum and coauthors searched for interesting objects in publicly available images from COSMOS-Web, a JWST program dedicated to understanding how galaxies have evolved over the course of cosmic history. Having already published their discovery of a complete Einstein ring in the COSMOS-Web field, the team is now revealing a second finding: a galaxy featuring two bright, compact nuclei, two starry rings, and an unexpected inhabitant right in the center.

four views of the Infinity Galaxy

Four views of the Infinity Galaxy from Hubble and JWST. [van Dokkum et al. 2025]

Gathering Data

To learn more about this strange object, named the Infinity Galaxy for its resemblance to the infinity symbol, the team gathered data from the Hubble Space Telescope, the Keck I telescope, the Chandra X-ray Observatory, and the Very Large Array. The resulting multiwavelength portrait allowed the team to weigh the two nuclei, showing them to be massive — containing 80 billion and 180 billion solar masses of stars — and extremely compact. The new data also revealed that the cloud of gas between the nuclei contains a 1-million-solar-mass black hole.

The nuclei, the rings, and the gas between them appear to be the result of two disk galaxies that shot through one another, forming a pair of collisional ring galaxies. To achieve the infinity-symbol shape, the galaxies must have met one another face on, forming two parallel nucleus–ring systems that we see from an angle of about 40º. As the galaxies collided, some of their gas would have been torn away, left tangled together in the void between the two nuclei.

To the Infinity Galaxy and Beyond

radio and X-ray observations of the Infinity Galaxy

Radio (left) and X-ray (right) observations of the Infinity Galaxy, demonstrating that the black hole candidate is a strong radio and X-ray source. Click to enlarge. [Adapted from van Dokkum et al. 2025]

That explains the nuclei, the rings, and the gas between them — but where did the black hole come from? It’s possible that the black hole’s position between the two nuclei is simply a coincidence, either due to a chance alignment with an unrelated galaxy that hosts the black hole, or because the black hole happened to end up there after being ejected from one of the galaxies involved in the collision, or even from another galaxy that merged with the Infinity Galaxy.

The authors favor a different explanation, in which the location of the black hole is no coincidence. In this scenario, the colliding galaxies crushed a gas cloud between them so forcefully that the condensed gas collapsed directly into a black hole. The authors estimated that the collision happened 50 million years ago and created a 300,000-solar-mass black hole that subsequently grew to its current mass of 1 million solar masses. Direct collapse has been proposed to be a source of the seeds of supermassive black holes in the early universe, though there are some differences between the proposed process in the early universe and what may be happening in the Infinity Galaxy.

Van Dokkum and collaborators concluded their article by saying that future observations could clarify whether the black hole is truly associated with the Infinity Galaxy — and as reported in a press release today, preliminary analysis of follow-up observations with JWST show just that. With the black hole now definitively placed within the Infinity Galaxy, the evidence for direct collapse is strengthened, though more work is needed to probe this possibility.

Citation

“The ∞ Galaxy: A Candidate Direct-Collapse Supermassive Black Hole Between Two Massive, Ringed Nuclei,” Pieter van Dokkum et al 2025 ApJL 988 L6. doi:10.3847/2041-8213/addcfe

The post A Candidate Direct-Collapse Black Hole in the Infinity Galaxy appeared first on AAS Nova.

Giving Justice to Intermediate-Mass Black Hole Mergers

1 July 2025 at 17:00

Artist's depiction of two black holes nearing a merger.

Editor’s Note: Astrobites is a graduate-student-run organization that digests astrophysical literature for undergraduate students. As part of the partnership between the AAS and astrobites, we occasionally repost astrobites content here at AAS Nova. We hope you enjoy this post from astrobites; the original can be viewed at astrobites.org.

Title: Intermediate Mass Ratio Inspirals in Milky Way Galaxies
Authors: Jillian Bellovary et al.
First Author’s Institution: Queensborough Community College
Status: Published in ApJ

Galaxies like our Milky Way are not just serene places hosting stars, gas, and dark matter. They also undergo a host of violent activities. Evidence strongly suggests that our Milky Way interacts with nearby dwarf galaxies, pulling them in entirely or tearing them apart through tidal forces. Dwarf galaxies, though small, often host black holes with masses between 103 and 105 solar masses (intermediate-mass black holes). When these dwarfs fall into the Milky Way’s gravitational pull, tidal forces strip them of stars and gas, leaving their black holes to roam the galaxy halo. Some of these “wandering” black holes spiral toward the central supermassive black hole. This leads to an event called inspiral, where black holes slowly spiral together before merging.

Mergers between an intermediate-mass black hole and a supermassive black hole are called intermediate mass ratio inspirals or IMRIs. They represent an intermediate case between major mergers involving equal-mass black holes and extreme mass ratio inspirals (EMRIs), where a stellar-mass black hole merges with a supermassive black hole. IMRIs are expected to generate gravitational waves that are detectable by the next-generation space-based gravitational wave detector, the Laser Interferometer Space Antenna (LISA). However, their waveforms remain challenging to model as the origins and development of these IMRIs are not fully understood.

Tracking IMRIs with Simulations

In today’s article, the authors use high-resolution simulations to study how IMRIs form and evolve, offering critical insights for the upcoming LISA mission. They used the DC Justice League simulation suite (the individual simulations are all named after women who have served on the US Supreme Court: Sandra, Ruth, Sonia, and Elena!) to model four Milky Way–like galaxies at high resolution to trace the origins of IMRIs. These simulations track the formation and evolution of massive black holes in dwarf galaxies that eventually merge into larger galactic systems.

What Did the Simulations Reveal?

The study uncovered key features of IMRIs in Milky Way–like galaxies:

    • Prevalence: About half of all massive black hole mergers were IMRIs, emphasizing their importance in galaxy evolution.
    • Timing of mergers: Most IMRI events occur early in the universe, approximately 3 billion years after the Big Bang, when galaxy mergers and interactions were more frequent (Figure 1).
    • Inspiral timescales: The duration of the inspiral process depends heavily on the compactness of the dwarf galaxy. Dense, compact dwarfs have faster inspiral times, whereas diffuse dwarfs slow down the process. A more compact galaxy can plunge deeper into the galaxy before being disrupted, resulting in a massive black hole that is closer to the center and will inspiral more quickly (Figure 2).
    • Orbital evolution: While some IMRIs become more circular over time, others maintain eccentric orbits until the merger.
merger mass ratio versus merger time

Figure 1: The yellow stars represent the merger times for IMRIs, while the purple circles show other types of black hole mergers, such as EMRIs and major mergers. Most IMRIs occurred in the early universe when black holes were smaller and mergers between galaxies were more frequent. [Bellovary et al. 2025]

dwarf galaxy compactness versus inspiral time

Figure 2: The correlation between the compactness of the dwarf galaxy (y-axis) and the inspiral time (x-axis). More compact dwarf galaxies (indicated by larger values on the y-axis) have shorter inspiral times. Here, the IMRIs are indicated by the yellow stars. [Bellovary et al. 2025]

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Why Does This Matter?

IMRIs offer a unique opportunity to study black hole demographics and galaxy assembly. The mass ratios and orbital eccentricities of these events are sensitive to the early conditions of black hole formation and the dynamics of galaxy mergers. However, IMRIs present challenges for gravitational wave detection. Unlike major mergers or EMRIs, their waveforms cannot be easily modeled using existing methods. The authors stress the need for a hybrid approach that combines post-Newtonian (commonly used for major mergers) and perturbative techniques (widely used for EMRIs) to simulate IMRI signals effectively.

The study also highlights the importance of preparing for LISA, slated to launch in the 2030s. As a space-based gravitational wave observatory, LISA will be sensitive to low-frequency waves produced by IMRIs at unprecedented distances. Accurate waveform models are essential for detecting these signals and extracting their astrophysical information. LISA’s detections of IMRIs could constrain the masses of black holes in dwarf galaxies, shed light on supermassive black hole seed formation mechanisms, and enhance our understanding of galaxy evolution across cosmic time.

Looking Ahead

While the authors of today’s article provide a detailed glimpse into the dynamics of IMRIs, they also highlight limitations. The small sample size and simplified black hole merger models call for broader studies using more comprehensive simulations. Future work must refine the physics of inspirals and develop robust waveform libraries to maximize LISA’s scientific return.

IMRIs are not just a niche class of black hole mergers; they are a treasure trove of information about the cosmic past. With LISA on the horizon, our ability to unlock these secrets is closer than ever!

Original astrobite edited by Tori Bonidie.

About the author, Archana Aravindan:

I am a PhD candidate at the University of California, Riverside, where I study black hole activity in small galaxies. When I am not looking through some incredible telescopes, you can usually find me reading, thinking about policy, or learning a cool language!

The post Giving Justice to Intermediate-Mass Black Hole Mergers appeared first on AAS Nova.

Black Hole vs. Magnetized Neutron Star: Matchup Predictions

12 May 2025 at 17:00

Artistic representation of the merger of a neutron star and a black hole

When a black hole consumes a neutron star, it’s typically thought to do so without an electromagnetic belch. New research explores the conditions under which a black hole’s neutron-star feast produces an observable electromagnetic signal.

Signaling a Collision

In the past few years, gravitational-wave detectors across the globe have detected a handful of neutron star–black hole mergers. What sorts of electromagnetic signals might accompany these outbursts of gravitational waves is a matter of intense interest.

In rare cases, if the black hole and neutron star are relatively close in mass, their gravitational tussle will rip the neutron star apart. As the shredded stellar material collects in a searingly hot disk around the black hole, it is expected to power a bright transient like a kilonova or a gamma-ray burst.

More commonly, the black hole is much more massive than the neutron star. In this case, the black hole should swallow the neutron star whole and without an electromagnetic trace — unless, as recent research shows, a strong magnetic field surrounds the neutron star.

Detailed Simulations

simulated merger of a neutron star and a black hole

The simulated merger of a neutron star and a black hole, in which the neutron star is swallowed whole. Click to enlarge. [Kim et al. 2025]

Yoonsoo Kim (California Institute of Technology) and collaborators used general relativistic magnetohydrodynamic simulations to explore the electromagnetic signals that might accompany the collision of a black hole and a magnetized neutron star. The simulations follow an 8.0-solar-mass black hole as it merges with a 1.4-solar-mass neutron star with a magnetic field of roughly 1016 Gauss — more than 10 quadrillion times the strength of Earth’s magnetic field.

As the simulated neutron star plunges toward the black hole, the neutron star’s magnetosphere — the region of space in which particles bend to the will of the neutron star’s magnetic field — begins to ripple with waves. The waves expand outward at nearly the speed of light, launching an exceptionally massive shock. This monster shock drives the creation of an electromagnetic transient: a flash of radio waves called a fast radio burst.

plot showing the striped, pulsar-like wind structure

The “striped” pulsar-like wind, shown at 7 milliseconds post-merger. The color scale shows the toroidal magnetic field component. [Adapted from Kim et al. 2025]

Striped Winds and a Fleeting Pulsar Phase

A second type of transient arises after the neutron star merges with the black hole. After the neutron star vanishes within the black hole’s waiting maw, its leftover magnetic field rearranges and begins to rotate, dragged along by the spinning black hole. Briefly, the black hole enters a pulsar-like state, surrounded by a “striped” wind created by spiraling magnetic field lines in alternating directions. As this magnetic field dissipates, a “fireball” of magnetized electron–positron plasma is ejected. When these electron–positron pairs annihilate, they briefly release another electromagnetic signal: a burst of X-rays and gamma rays.

Kim and coauthors noted that their simulated neutron star–black hole pair is similar in mass to the colliding pairs spotted by gravitational-wave detectors. This suggests that detectable gravitational-wave events may be accompanied by brief bursts at radio, X-ray, and gamma-ray wavelengths, providing another avenue to learn about these cosmic collisions.

Citation

“Black Hole Pulsars and Monster Shocks as Outcomes of Black Hole–Neutron Star Mergers,” Yoonsoo Kim et al 2025 ApJL 982 L54. doi:10.3847/2041-8213/adbff9

The post Black Hole vs. Magnetized Neutron Star: Matchup Predictions appeared first on AAS Nova.

❌