❌

Reading view

When glaciers retreat, microbes take over

As our world is rapidly reshaped by climate change, glaciers have retreated and revealed new swaths of bare land. Throughout the coming decades to centuries, this rocky ground will become dappled with lichens and scrub, eventually giving rise to newborn forests in a process known as ecological succession.Β 

Ecologists have mapped out the stages of ecological succession for plant communities, observing which species are the first to colonize land and how these pioneer species promote secondary growth. Yet before any plants sink their roots into the soil, it is populated by thriving communities of single-celled microbes that prepare it for further habitation. Scientists study how these microbial communities arise to understand how healthy ecosystems develop.

Newly exposed land is nutrient-poor and subject to large temperature fluctuations, so the first species to settle there must overcome these challenges. Pioneer plant species are often habitat generalists, meaning they can thrive under a variety of environmental conditions. However, all plants convert water and sunlight into carbon and energy. Microbes can use many different energy sources, and often contain genes for multiple metabolisms in their genomes. Therefore, researchers wondered whether pioneer microbes could also be defined by their metabolic flexibility.Β 

A team of scientists based at Monash University in Australia tested this hypothesis by studying land left in the wake of 2 retreating glaciers: one on an island off the coast of Antarctica and one in the Swiss Alps. The researchers sampled soils along a path from the tip of the glacier outward, which had been exposed to the air for different amounts of time. By comparing the microbial communities within these soils, the researchers could track the different stages of ecological succession after glacial retreat.

The researchers extracted DNA from the soils and analyzed it using 2 sequencing methods. First, they sequenced a gene called 16S rRNA, which is like a microbial fingerprint for the different species present. They used this method to understand the diversity of these communities and track their species overlap, helping them to identify habitat generalists that thrived under different soil conditions.Β 

To understand the metabolic flexibility of these microbes, the researchers used a second method, known as metagenomics, which sequences all of the DNA in a sample rather than just a single gene. They used these data to reconstruct the entire genomes of microbes present in the soils, providing information on what kinds of metabolic activities they were capable of. The team also measured chemicals like ammonium and sulfide in the soils, as well as atmospheric gases like methane and carbon monoxide, to assess how the microbes used these compounds for growth.

The researchers found microbes inhabiting even the youngest soils, demonstrating the speed at which life takes hold in new environments. The abundance of microbes increased by approximately 8-fold in older soils, alongside a similar rise in species diversity, indicating that complex communities persisted over time. They also found the metabolic capabilities of microbes inhabiting Antarctic and Swiss glacial soils to be remarkably similar, suggesting common selective pressures drove the establishment of these new ecosystems.

They were surprised to discover that the most abundant microbes in younger soils were habitat specialists that were rare in older soils. These pioneer microbes, while still metabolically flexible, had adapted to utilize meager energy sources like atmospheric trace gases, including hydrogen, methane, and carbon monoxide. Many of these microbes could also derive energy from chemicals that dissolved out of rocks, like inorganic sulfur compounds. The researchers proposed that pioneer microbes could quickly take advantage of newly opened ecological niches, like soils exposed during a glacier’s retreat, because of their efficiency at using scant resources.Β 

They found that habitat generalists, on the other hand, tended to dominate older soils.Β  This result suggested that the habitat specialists were eventually outcompeted by the slow and steady growth of the habitat generalists in a real-life turtle-and-hare race.

The team concluded that using multiple growth strategies helps microbes adapt to new environments. However, they acknowledged that ecological succession could occur differently in other landscapes, such as in the aftermath of volcanic eruptions, meteorite impacts, or forest fires. They suggested that future researchers work to uncover how microbial communities lay the groundwork across these diverse ecosystems.Β 

The post When glaciers retreat, microbes take over appeared first on Sciworthy.

  •  

GitHub adds new Copilot features as usage-based billing takes effect

GitHub is expanding Copilot beyond the IDE with a new desktop application and a new collaborative work surface called canvas as part of its broader efforts to pitch the AI-assisted coding tool as the control center for agent-native software development.

The desktop application announced at Microsoft’s annual Build conference this week is designed to give developers a dedicated environment for working with AI agents throughout the software development lifecycle, rather than limiting those interactions to code-generation tasks inside an editor, the company wrote in a blog post.

The application includes a collaborative workspace called canvas where developers can brainstorm ideas, refine requirements, generate plans, and iterate on projects alongside AI, it said.

It also has new Agent Merge and code review features that enable developers to automate Copilot to combine tasks of different agents to complete a specific goal or conduct autonomous code reviews according to set standards, it said.

These new features could reduce context switching, increase engineering efficiency, and accelerate delivery cycles, said Phil Fersht, CEO of HFS Research.

Shift in pricing justified?

However, despite the new features, much of the conversation among developers in recent weeks has centered on a different topic: this week’s shift to a usage-based billing model for GitHub Copilot that it announced in April.

The changes were met with a wave of criticism on the GitHub community forum, where some users accused the company of a β€œbait and switch,” while others requested refunds or announced plans to cancel their subscriptions.

For analysts, though, the pricing change was, at least from GitHub’s point of view, necessary and justified.

β€œThe pricing change is justified by where GitHub is going, not by where the product is today. Running multiple agents in parallel with sandboxes, canvas reviews, and Agent Merge looping through CI is closer to cloud compute than an IDE plugin, and you cannot price compute on a flat seat fee. So metered billing is the right call structurally,” said Advait Patel, a senior reliability engineer at Broadcom.

Fersht said developers and CIOs need to focus on Copilot’s metamorphosis from being a coding assistant into a platform for orchestrating software-development agents and workflows.

β€œThat changes the ROI conversation significantly. CIOs should stop thinking about Copilot as a seat-license productivity tool and instead evaluate it as an AI-powered software delivery platform,” he said. β€œThe metrics shift from β€˜lines of code generated’ to broader operational outcomes such as release velocity, code quality, defect reduction and engineering efficiency.”

GitHub is not the first company offering vibe-coding tools to rethink its pricing strategy as AI agents proliferate across enterprises and evolve to take on more complex software-development tasks that are computationally more intensive.

Over the past year, platforms such as Claude Code, Replit, Cursor, and Kiro have repeatedly adjusted their pricing structures to account for mounting infrastructure costs, limited GPU availability, and the expense of serving increasingly sophisticated AI models and agents, despite furor among their users.

For CIOs, the challenge is proving ROI

That common pressure across AI coding vendors is why Amit Chandak, chief analytics officer at IT consulting firm Kanerika, thinks developers and CIOs should focus less on GitHub’s pricing mechanics and more on whether these increasingly capable tools are delivering measurable business value.

β€œThe new features that GitHub announced can act as productivity multipliers as well as features that increase consumption without delivering proportional business value. Without productivity baselines established before adoption, enterprises risk absorbing higher costs with no clear line back to delivered value,” Chandak said.

For Fersht, developers and CIOs will need to focus on governance, monitoring and financial controls as the pricing model is changing.

β€œThe governance challenge is very real. Autonomous agents can continuously reason, test, revise and interact with multiple systems in ways that create far less predictable consumption patterns than traditional SaaS tools,” he said.

Patel, however, advised users and decision-makers to be more skeptical, especially since the new features are currently in technical preview.

β€œCustomers are being asked to pay variable rates now for value that has not been validated in production. Do not assume new capabilities justify higher spend,” he said. β€œInstead, run a 90 day pilot, measure PRs merged per dollar before and after, and let the data decide. If the ratio improves, the pricing is fair. If it does not, you are paying for promise, not delivery,” Patel added.

  •  
❌