As artificial intelligence drives soaring demand for electricity and water, companies are looking to orbit for an alternative.

Community members successfully stand down the federal government’s attempts to build a border wall through Texas’ famed Big Bend region.

Scientists in biodiversity-rich countries are using digitized plant records to identify rare species and inform what gets protected.

The ocean has quietly absorbed billions of tons of humanity’s carbon emissions over the past two centuries, but scientists and companies racing to supercharge that natural service have long been hampered by a stubborn and costly engineering problem. Now researchers at Stony Brook University, working with the Research Foundation for the State University of New York, have unveiled a method for electrochemical ocean alkalinity enhancement that they say can dramatically lower the cost of ocean-based carbon dioxide removal by eliminating one of the most expensive steps in the entire process: the pretreatment of seawater before it enters an electrochemical reactor. The innovation, now available for licensing through SUNY TechConnect, promises high-quality carbon offsets at a substantially reduced cost while simultaneously helping to counteract the acidification that threatens marine ecosystems worldwide.

At the heart of the challenge is a delicate chemical balancing act. As atmospheric carbon dioxide dissolves into seawater, it forms carbonic acid, which lowers the ocean’s pH and erodes the carbonate chemistry that corals, shellfish and other calcifying organisms depend upon. Ocean carbon dioxide capture exploits a simple principle: if the ocean becomes more alkaline, it can absorb more CO2 from the air and lock it away safely as bicarbonate, one of the most stable and abundant forms of inorganic carbon on Earth. This process, known as ocean alkalinity enhancement, effectively turns the surface ocean into a vast, distributed carbon sink. But adding alkalinity to seawater is not trivial, and doing it in a way that is energy-efficient, scalable and safe has become one of the central engineering puzzles of the emerging carbon removal industry.

One of the most promising approaches relies on electrochemistry, specifically a technique called bipolar membrane electrodialysis. In this system, ion-selective membranes are stacked between two end electrodes, and the arrangement allows operators to split ordinary saltwater into its constituent acid and base. When brine containing sodium chloride flows through the stack, the process generates hydrochloric acid on one side and sodium hydroxide, a strong base, on the other. The elegance of the scheme lies in its product handling: if the hydrochloric acid is kept on land, where it can be stored, neutralized or put to industrial use, and only the sodium hydroxide along with the treated seawater is returned to the ocean, the receiving waters gain a net infusion of alkalinity. That added alkalinity shifts the carbonate equilibrium, allowing the ocean to draw down carbon dioxide from the atmosphere and convert it into dissolved bicarbonate that remains stable for millennia.

This electrochemical pathway has attracted serious commercial interest precisely because it produces what carbon markets call negative emissions, meaning carbon dioxide is durably removed from the atmosphere rather than merely avoided. Companies pursuing net-zero targets increasingly rely on such carbon removal credits to offset their residual emissions, and ocean alkalinity enhancement is widely regarded as one of the largest-capacity avenues available, given the sheer scale of the world’s oceans. Yet the technology has been held back by a deceptively mundane problem: what flows into the reactor matters just as much as what flows out.

Seawater, and many other brine streams that might feed these systems, contains divalent cations, most notably calcium and magnesium ions, alongside the sodium and chloride that the process is designed to split. When these divalent ions encounter the high-pH conditions created at the base-producing side of a bipolar membrane stack, they precipitate as solid calcium and magnesium compounds that coat the membranes in a crust known as scale. The consequences are cascading. Scaled membranes lose their ion-selective efficiency, forcing the system to push harder and consume more electricity to achieve the same output. Over time, the deposits shorten membrane lifetime, increasing maintenance frequency and replacement costs. The conventional answer has been water softening pretreatment, in which the incoming seawater is stripped of calcium and magnesium before it ever reaches the electrodialysis unit. While effective, such pretreatment adds significant capital and operating expense, undermining the economic case for the entire carbon removal operation and eroding the value proposition of the resulting carbon credits.

The Stony Brook researchers behind the new method have essentially designed around this bottleneck. Their technology enables electrochemical enhancement of ocean alkalinity without any pretreatment of the incoming seawater at all. By rethinking how the electrochemical system handles brine streams laden with divalent cations, the researchers have created a process that tolerates raw seawater directly, sidestepping the water softening infrastructure that previous designs demanded. According to the announcement from the Research Foundation for SUNY, the result is a system that produces negative emission carbon offsets of very high quality at a substantially reduced cost, simply because the most expensive upstream step has been engineered out of existence. The advantages claimed for the approach are straightforward and commercially significant: it is cheaper, more energy efficient, and requires no expensive water softening pretreatment.

The implications ripple across both the carbon markets and the broader climate technology landscape. Carbon offset buyers, including corporations striving to meet net-zero commitments, place a premium on removal credits that are durable, verifiable and cost-competitive. Ocean alkalinity enhancement already offers exceptional permanence, since bicarbonate dissolved in seawater represents one of the most long-lived forms of carbon storage known. By cutting costs at the front end, the Stony Brook method could help push the price of these high-quality ocean-based offsets toward levels that make them viable at gigatonne scale, a threshold that analysts consider essential if carbon removal is to play a meaningful role in stabilizing the global climate. Cheaper alkalinity generation also strengthens the second major application of the technology: mitigating ocean acidification directly, without necessarily framing it as a carbon market product at all.

Ocean acidification itself is a mounting crisis. Since the industrial revolution, the average surface ocean pH has dropped measurably as the sea has absorbed roughly a quarter to a third of anthropogenic CO2 emissions. The consequences have been documented across coral reefs, oyster hatcheries, pteropods and other calcifying organisms whose shells and skeletons become harder to build in increasingly acidic waters. A technology that adds alkalinity to coastal waters and open ocean regions simultaneously addresses this chemical stress and harvests the carbon removal benefit, a dual function that distinguishes ocean alkalinity enhancement from many other carbon removal approaches. In regions where fisheries, aquaculture and reef ecosystems are economically vital, localized deployment of alkalinity-enhancing electrochemical systems could offer both environmental resilience and revenue through carbon credit sales.

The scientific pedigree of the work reflects the growing maturity of the carbon removal field. Stony Brook University, a flagship research institution within the SUNY system, has become an active hub for climate and energy innovation, and the new method is protected under intellectual property identified in the licensing announcement. The Research Foundation for the State University of New York, the nation’s largest research foundation supporting the nation’s largest public university system, is actively seeking development partners, commercial partners and licensees to translate the laboratory advance into deployed systems. The foundation describes a broad portfolio of SUNY-led research spanning artificial intelligence for the public good, quantum technologies, next-generation semiconductors, biotechnology and medicine, and energy and climate solutions, with system-wide research expenditures approaching 1.5 billion dollars in fiscal year 2025.

For the carbon removal industry, the timing of the announcement is notable. As voluntary and compliance carbon markets mature, buyers are demanding higher fidelity in the offsets they purchase, favoring durable removal over avoidance-based credits. Electrochemical ocean alkalinity enhancement, with its well-understood chemistry and measurable inputs and outputs, is well positioned to meet rigorous monitoring, reporting and verification standards. The obstacle has always been cost, and the pretreatment bottleneck has been a substantial contributor. If the Stony Brook design performs as described at industrial scale, it could remove one of the largest cost wedges standing between laboratory demonstration and commercial deployment, accelerating a technology class that many climate analysts view as indispensable to achieving deep decarbonization.

The broader lesson of the advance may be as important as the technology itself. In the race to scale carbon removal, progress often comes not from exotic new chemistry but from eliminating the hidden costs and fragilities that make promising concepts uneconomic in practice. Water softening pretreatment is exactly the kind of unglamorous engineering detail that determines whether a climate technology remains a paper exercise or becomes infrastructure. By designing a bipolar membrane electrodialysis system that thrives on untreated seawater, the Stony Brook researchers have addressed one of those decisive details. The ocean, meanwhile, stands ready. Every unit of alkalinity added is an invitation for the sea to take up more carbon dioxide and, in doing so, to heal a little of the acidification that a warming world has inflicted upon it. What remains now is the work of scaling, partnering and commercializing, and the SUNY licensing announcement signals that the researchers and their institution intend to see this chemistry leave the laboratory and reach the sea.

The question is no longer whether the system must be rebuilt—it is whether the country can rebuild it before the next crisis.

Offshore wind farms can pose risks to birds and marine life. But their foundations also serve as artificial reefs, offering essential habit.

Can clothing become a climate solution?

By investing in regenerative organic agriculture, Davines Group is linking farming and scientific research with ingredient transparency.

In recent years, forests have emerged as pivotal players in global climate mitigation efforts, representing one of the most promising nature-based climate solutions available today. These ecosystems sequester approximately 31% of anthropogenic carbon dioxide emissions annually, providing a critical buffer against the accelerating pace of climate change. However, the reliability of forest carbon credit systems—mechanisms designed to monetize and incentivize carbon sequestration efforts—has come under intense scrutiny. A groundbreaking study published in the journal Biological Diversity unveils deep-rooted methodological flaws that cast profound doubt on the environmental integrity of current carbon credit frameworks, signaling a crisis of confidence across global carbon markets.

The rigorous analysis, spearheaded by environmental scientists from Yangtze University and Beijing Normal University, meticulously dissects the complex architecture of forest carbon credit systems and identifies four principal structural weaknesses that collectively undermine their trustworthiness. Foremost among these is the use of subjective assessments of additionality, a core concept requiring that credited emissions reductions would not have occurred in the absence of the project. Present carbon credit models predominantly rely on static historical baselines to calculate additionality, yet only an alarming 6% of REDD+ credits—credits allocated under the United Nations’ Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation program—provide robust empirical evidence to substantiate genuine additional carbon mitigation.

Beyond the critical challenge of additionality, the permanence of carbon sequestration—signifying the long-term retention of carbon stock in forest biomass—is grossly overestimated by current standards. This overestimation is particularly precarious in light of escalating ecological disturbances linked to climate change including wildfires, prolonged droughts, pestilence outbreaks, and inadvertent carbon leakage where forest degradation shifts to unmonitored regions. The failure to appropriately incorporate these growing risks into permanence calculations means that many credited projects likely exaggerate their true contribution to climate mitigation, presenting an illusory picture of impact.

The study further reveals that leakage accounting—the assessment and adjustment for project-driven emissions displacement—is critically underdeveloped. Prevailing methodologies apply a modest average leakage deduction of only 7%, a figure that starkly contrasts with empirical findings suggesting leakage rates ranging from 10% to a staggering 70%. Such systemic under-accounting inflates the perceived net climate benefits of these forest projects, enabling an artificially optimistic valuation of carbon credits within international markets and undermining carbon trading integrity.

Compounding these shortcomings are the conspicuous omissions of biophysical impacts such as albedo and evapotranspiration effects in carbon accounting. Forest ecosystems substantially influence Earth’s energy balance through their reflectance properties and water cycling functions. Neglecting these elements obscures the true net climate impact, as alterations in surface albedo can significantly offset the cooling benefits gained from carbon sequestration, thereby diluting the overall effectiveness of forest-based interventions in climate regulation.

The collective failure to address these intertwined issues has deep ramifications not only for the credibility of carbon markets but also for biodiversity conservation and community well-being, which are often marginalized in project implementation. Insufficient local community involvement and opaque benefit-sharing arrangements risk alienating indigenous stakeholders, raising social equity concerns, and jeopardizing the sustainability and durability of mitigation efforts.

In response to these multifaceted challenges, the research team advocates for a transformative overhaul of forest carbon credit systems through a data-driven, science-based, and integrative accounting framework. Central to this reform is the replacement of static baselines with dynamic monitoring systems that leverage high-frequency remote sensing technologies alongside advanced machine learning algorithms. This approach enables objective, continuous, and quantitative assessments of additionality, dramatically enhancing transparency and scientific rigor in credit issuance.

Addressing permanence requires the establishment of a comprehensive three-tier risk management architecture comprised of prevention, buffering, and insurance mechanisms. This tiered system proactively mitigates disturbances by integrating biodiversity conservation as a mandatory compliance criterion rather than considering it a supplemental benefit, thus embedding ecosystem resilience at the heart of carbon project governance.

Transparency and standardization are equally emphasized through the call for stringent Monitoring, Reporting, and Verification (MRV) protocols. The use of cutting-edge technologies such as Light Detection and Ranging (LiDAR) and environmental DNA (eDNA) is prescribed to ensure precise biomass and biodiversity assessments. Additionally, mandatory disclosure of datasets and verification methodologies aims to foster independent third-party audits, enhancing accountability and stakeholder confidence in carbon accounting practices.

Sociopolitical dimensions are also addressed, with the framework highlighting the critical necessity of formalized community governance structures and the institutionalization of Free, Prior, and Informed Consent (FPIC) procedures. These mandates ensure that forest-dependent communities retain decision-making power and equitable access to the socioeconomic benefits derived from carbon sequestration projects, thereby reinforcing local stewardship and long-term project viability.

While the introduction of these rigorous standards is expected to contract the overall volume of carbon credits issued—reflecting a more conservative and realistic accounting of mitigation gains—the resultant credits will embody higher integrity and trustworthiness. This qualitative transformation is paramount for forest carbon credits to evolve from contested commodities susceptible to skepticism into robust and reliable assets underpinning credible global climate governance.

The implications of this research are profound. By embedding scientific rigor and standardized risk management, forest carbon credits can realize their full potential as durable climate mitigation tools while simultaneously safeguarding biodiversity and respecting community rights. This paradigm shift promises to restore confidence among stakeholders, catalyze more effective climate finance mechanisms, and advance global efforts to stabilize the Earth’s climate system.

Ultimately, this work underscores a crucial message: nature-based climate solutions like forests must be governed by scientifically sound and socially just frameworks. Only through such commitment to transparency, accuracy, and inclusivity can these natural assets deliver genuine and lasting contributions to the fight against climate change.

---

Subject of Research: Not applicable
Article Title: Restoring Trust: Rebuilding the Forest Carbon Credit System Through Scientific Rigor
News Publication Date: June 17, 2026
Web References: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bod2.70026
References: Chen, Xiaoqian, and Shaokun Li. 2026. “Restoring Trust: Rebuilding the Forest Carbon Credit System Through Scientific Rigor,” Biological Diversity: 1–5.
Image Credits: Xiaoqian Chen, and Shaokun Li
Keywords: Environmental sciences, Carbon emissions, Biodiversity conservation, Climate change mitigation, Risk management, Deforestation, Community ecology, Albedo, Resource policy, Environmental economics, Sustainable development, Land use, Climate change adaptation, Forestry, Carbon, Environmental policy, Environmental impact assessments, Environmental management, Remote sensing, Forest ecosystems