It questioned the ethics of what it was doing—before proceeding to do it.

Take the statistical AI doomsday warnings and divide them by a grain of salt.

More recently, he’s framed the Israel-Hamas War in Gaza as a struggle of good versus evil.

While other companies warn of an impending AI-pocalypse, Apple is making the technology seem refreshingly mundane.

Science has always been driven by friendly competition and the free exchange of ideas. In the age of AI, it will be driven by greed.

Companies like Pangram and Originality.ai can help to clear up the confusion. But they’re not a silver bullet.

The device, called NEO, records neuronal activity and translates it to movements made by a metal glove worn by a patient.

Others, meanwhile, argue that the US has a moral obligation to build powerful autonomous weapons systems—lest our adversaries get there first.

The Trump family and federal prosecutors have had their eyes on the industry, too.

The senator is making the case that AI is a public resource that was built using the collective genius of humanity.

The company is also opening a spa in downtown San Francisco, “with pools of golden light which softly scan your body.”

Of course, whether the administration cares about the legal basis is an open question.

It’s an early experiment in adding a measure of accountability to an increasingly lawless internet.

Affordability is becoming an existential problem for frontier models.

The quarrel between the federal government and the startup behind Fable and Mythos thickened over the weekend.

Big tech says its circular dealmaking is a virtuous dealmaking. To others it looks more like a noose.

As if anyone is supposed to know what a million tokens adds up to.