Apple ties iCloud+ pricing to video summaries

If you have HomeKit-compatible security cameras, you may have heard that Apple was going to ship an Apple Intelligence upgrade with the version 27 operating system releases. Apple Home would now provide an analysis in words of what was happening in a clip, making it easier to search for things that had occurred, instead of βanimalβ or a personβs name.
But itβll cost you. Maybe more than you expected. Apple had said it would require an iCloud+ subscription, its name for what used to be simply extra storage. Starting at $0.99 a month (in the United States) for 50 GB of extra storageβbarely enough for any purposeβoptions range all the way to $59.99 a month for 12 TB of storage. With an Apple One plan, you can increase that to 14 TB.
Over time, Apple added additional features: iCloud Private Relay, Hide My Email, a custom email domain name, Apple Invites, and HomeKit Secure Video. A 50 GB tier supported one camera, 200 GB ($2.99 a month) supported up to five, and the 2 TB ($9.99 a month) and higher tiers supported unlimited cameras.
In a support note updated September 9, Apple dropped the price bomb. Because video summaries require higher usage of Apple Intelligence, your iCloud+ subscription has to be at an even higher level than the basic secure video offering:
- 1 camera in the 2 TB tier
- 2 cameras in the 6 TB tier ($29.99 a month)
- 5 cameras in the 12 TB tier ($59.99 a month)
You also need an Apple TV 4K or 2nd-generation HomePod. Make sure theyβre upgraded before you try to work with the new feature. To enable it, go to the Home app in iOS 27, iPadOS 27, or macOS 27 Golden Gate. Tap or click the settings icon, then choose the new Apple Intelligence menu. Enable Summarize Videos. You can select as many cameras as your iCloud+ tier supports. Once you flip the switch for that many, the rest are grayed out.
Thereβs definitely a pricing mismatch here. I donβt think thereβs a case for video summaries for 2 to 5 cameras costing $30 to $60 a month if you donβt need the storage. Iβve stayed comfortably at the 2 TB tier for many yearsβnow paid via an Apple One bundleβfor personal and family storage, and for the number of cameras we have.
However, I also accept that video processing is computationally intense. Apple canβt throw open the doors. But having advertised a feature as something it feels is useful, this service price tag seems too high. Apple rarely lowers service prices; I canβt think of a time it did. But it also canβt underprice the server capacity required to manage this task. The company may have painted itself into a corner.