❌

Normal view

Hybrid graphene–MXene–WS₂ terahertz metasurface detects chikungunya virus via machine learning

11 September 2026 at 11:38

Scientists have unveiled a computational design for a terahertz metasurface biosensor that combines five distinct materials—graphene, MXene, tungsten disulfide, gold, and copper—into a single multilayer architecture capable of detecting refractive-index changes associated with chikungunya virus infection. The study, published in Results in Optics by G. Arunachalam, A.R. Kalaiarasi, Giri.G. Hallur, and V. Parthasarathy, reports a numerically predicted sensitivity of 907 GHz per refractive-index unit, among the highest values reported for hybrid-material terahertz biosensors, and couples the electromagnetic design to an XGBoost machine-learning surrogate model that predicts sensor behavior with accuracies exceeding 99.8 percent.

Chikungunya virus is an enveloped, positive-sense single-stranded RNA alphavirus transmitted primarily by Aedes aegypti and Aedes albopictus mosquitoes. While mortality remains low, generally below 0.1 percent, the broader public health burden arises from severe polyarthralgia that can persist for months or even years in a substantial fraction of patients across tropical and subtropical regions. With no approved antiviral therapy or licensed vaccine currently available, diagnostic accuracy sits at the center of clinical management and transmission control. Yet existing diagnostic tools face significant practical constraints, particularly in point-of-care and field settings.

Serological methods such as enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay suffer from cross-reactivity with related alphaviruses, including Ross River and O’nyong-nyong viruses, reducing diagnostic specificity. Real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction offers high sensitivity during the acute phase but depends on laboratory infrastructure, trained personnel, and controlled sample handling. Virus isolation in cell culture provides confirmatory results but requires biosafety level-3 facilities and extended processing time. These limitations have motivated the search for rapid, label-free sensing approaches capable of operating at clinically relevant concentrations in decentralized environments.

The new work turns to the terahertz band, spanning roughly 0.1 to 10 THz, which lies between microwave and infrared regions of the electromagnetic spectrum. Terahertz radiation is non-ionising, with photon energies in the millielectronvolt range, allowing interaction with biological samples without causing ionising damage. Crucially, terahertz waves couple to low-frequency vibrational and rotational modes of biomolecules such as proteins, nucleic acids, and polysaccharides, producing measurable spectral features that support label-free detection. Because biological media including blood plasma and viral suspensions exhibit refractive-index variations in this domain, differences on the order of 0.01 to 0.02 refractive-index units can shift resonance frequency and field distribution when coupled to resonant sensing structures.

The proposed sensor is built around a periodically repeated square unit cell containing two identical square resonators, 2000 nanometers on a side, coated with tungsten disulfide—a two-dimensional transition metal dichalcogenide with strong light–matter interaction, high carrier mobility, and excellent dielectric confinement. This layer localizes the electric field in the sensing region and increases the interaction volume between the resonant field and the surrounding analyte. A pair of concentric circular rings, 3200 and 3800 nanometers in diameter and functionalized with MXene, surrounds the resonators, enhancing electromagnetic coupling, promoting efficient charge transport, and strengthening plasmonic interactions between resonator elements. An outer gold ring, 6000 nanometers in diameter, serves as the main plasmonic resonator supporting strong localized surface plasmon resonances with low optical loss. The entire multi-resonant assembly is embedded within a monolayer graphene sheet measuring 14,000 by 14,000 nanometers, which acts as a broadband absorber and a high-mobility charge transport medium whose electrically tunable chemical potential allows dynamic, active control of the resonance characteristics. Copper elements woven into the architecture provide supplementary conductive pathways that reinforce current distribution and coupling among the hybrid resonators. The structure rests on a silicon dioxide substrate, chosen for its low dielectric loss and mechanical robustness, which preserves the resonance quality factor.

The authors stress that the multilayer design is compatible with established microfabrication techniques. Fabrication would begin with a cleaned silicon dioxide substrate, followed by polymer-assisted transfer of monolayer graphene and thermal annealing. Gold and copper resonators can be deposited through electron-beam evaporation or magnetron sputtering with lift-off patterning, MXene rings through solution-based deposition, and the tungsten disulfide layer through chemical vapor deposition or thin-film transfer. With a unit-cell dimension of approximately 14 micrometers, the required feature sizes fall comfortably within conventional photolithography capabilities, and because fabrication imperfections remain far smaller than the operating terahertz wavelength, moderate tolerances are expected to have only limited influence on the electromagnetic response. For biosensing, the graphene surface could subsequently be functionalized with chikungunya-specific antibodies or aptamers using EDC/NHS or pyrene-based linker chemistries.

The electromagnetic modeling, performed in COMSOL Multiphysics, reveals a pronounced resonance at 0.355 THz, where electric-field simulations show the strongest and most spatially extensive enhancement. Varying the graphene chemical potential from 0.1 to 0.9 electronvolts produced dramatic modulation of the transmission contrast, which increased roughly 36-fold at the highest bias, from less than one percentage point to more than 27 percentage points, while peak transmission remained essentially unchanged above 98.6 percent. This asymmetric response—stable maxima paired with strongly modulated minima—arises because increasing chemical potential enhances graphene’s intraband conductivity, deepening resonant absorption through stronger light–matter interaction. The sensor also demonstrated remarkable angular robustness, maintaining peak transmittance above 97.8 percent across incident angles from 0 to 80 degrees, an important tolerance for realistic deployment where normal incidence cannot always be guaranteed.

Geometric optimization identified an outer circular resonator radius of 2500 nanometers and a square resonator side length of 2500 nanometers as the dimensions that maximize resonance strength, driving minimum transmittance down to approximately 65 to 67 percent and signifying optimal electromagnetic confinement within the active sensing region. When evaluated across refractive indices from 1.33 to 1.39, a range encompassing reported values for healthy plasma (approximately 1.35 RIU), healthy platelets (1.39 RIU), chikungunya-infected plasma (1.33 RIU), and infected platelets (1.38 RIU), the optimized configuration achieved a maximum sensitivity of 907 GHz/RIU, a figure of merit of 18.519 RIU⁻¹, a minimum detection limit of 0.061 RIU, a sensor resolution of 55.178, and a refractive-index resolution of 0.001 RIU. In comparative benchmarks against recently reported graphene- and hybrid-material-based terahertz biosensors—including graphene/copper/aluminum, graphene/silicon dioxide, MXene–graphene–black phosphorus, and graphene-integrated copper–silver designs—the proposed architecture’s sensitivity exceeded most published values, reflecting the synergistic field confinement produced by the five-material stack.

The machine-learning component addresses one of the central bottlenecks in metasurface development: the computational cost of repeated full-wave finite-element simulations during structural optimization. The team trained an XGBoost regressor, an ensemble method based on gradient-boosted decision trees, on simulation data covering incidence-angle variation and circular-ring dimension variation, using stratified sampling with 80 percent of data for training and 20 percent held out for independent testing, alongside five-fold cross-validation and grid-search hyperparameter optimization. The model captured more than 99.7 percent of response variance on unseen data, with mean absolute percentage errors below 0.162 percent and prediction accuracies from 99.838 to 99.959 percent. Acting as a computational surrogate, the trained model enables rapid interpolation across the design space without sacrificing the fidelity of the underlying electromagnetic model.

The authors are careful to frame the work as a computational proof-of-concept rather than an experimentally validated diagnostic. The sensor detects changes in the local dielectric environment surrounding the resonators, not viral particles or nucleic acids directly, and refractive-index sensing alone cannot intrinsically distinguish chikungunya from other viruses with similar dielectric properties. Analytical specificity in practice will depend on surface biofunctionalization with chikungunya-specific recognition molecules immobilized on the graphene or gold sensing surface. Future work will focus on device fabrication, biofunctionalization, calibration with reference refractive-index standards, experimental validation with clinically relevant plasma and platelet samples, and systematic evaluation of selectivity against related arboviruses—steps that would transform this numerically validated platform into a practical tool for rapid, label-free infectious disease diagnostics in the field.

Subject of Research: Label-free terahertz metasurface biosensing for chikungunya virus detection using a hybrid graphene–MXene–WS₂–Au–Cu architecture with machine-learning-assisted optimization

Article Title: Hybrid graphene–MXene–WS₂ terahertz metasurface detects chikungunya virus via machine learning

Article References: Arunachalam, G., Kalaiarasi, A., Hallur, G., & Parthasarathy, V. (2026). Machine learning-assisted hybrid graphene–MXene–WS₂ terahertz metasurface biosensor for highly sensitive label-free chikungunya virus detection. Results in Optics, 25, Article 101149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rio.2026.101149

Image Credits: AI Generated

DOI: 10.1016/j.rio.2026.101149

Keywords: chikungunya virus detection, computational biosensor design, high sensitivity biosensors, hybrid graphene MXene WS₂, machine learning in biosensing, multilayer architecture, nanomaterial-based sensors, public health diagnostics, refractive index sensing, terahertz metasurface biosensor, virus diagnosis in field settings, XGBoost surrogate model

Why enterprises should start with on-site AI agents

10 September 2026 at 11:00

When I talk to people about agents interacting with websites, the conversation almost always starts with perception: how does an agent “see” a page? Is it screenshots or the DOM or the accessibility tree? In my previous InfoWorld article, “Accessibility is the first-class interface for AI agents”, I argued that the accessibility tree is becoming an increasingly important interface between websites and AI agents. From there the conversation shifts to actuation, and to ways of making it less brittle, which let a site expose its own actions as callable tools instead of forcing an agent to guess at buttons and forms.

That conversation matters. But it leaves out a more consequential architectural question, one that determines who is accountable when an agent gets something wrong: where does the agent live?

There are three plausible homes for an agent that interacts with your business: on-site, in-browser and off-browser. Each one trades control for reach differently. Right now, much of the industry’s attention is focused on the two homes furthest from the business: browser extensions that co-browse alongside a user, and autonomous agents running in the cloud that talk to your APIs or drive a browser on their own.

I think that is the wrong place for most enterprises to start.

If you run a business with real compliance exposure, or a brand you cannot afford to have misrepresented, the pragmatic move is to build the agent that lives on your own site first and treat reach as a problem you solve later, on your own terms.

Reach without governance is a liability

The appeal of in-browser and off-browser agents is obvious. They promise discovery, scale and automation you do not have to build or maintain yourself. An off-browser agent can compare your prices against every competitor and keep working after your support team has gone home. A co-browsing extension can act inside a user’s already authenticated session without requiring any special integration on your side.

But an agent you do not control is still speaking for your business.

An off-browser agent talking to your APIs or scraping your DOM runs on a model you did not choose, follows guardrails you did not write and represents your brand in a conversation you cannot see. If it misquotes a price, misstates a policy or initiates a transaction that creates a customer dispute, the fact that the agent belonged to somebody else may not make the resulting problem disappear.

There is also a deeper security problem. Computer-use agents interact with untrusted content by design. Anthropic’s guidance for browser and computer-use agents notes that webpages and application interfaces can contain adversarial instructions and recommends scoped permissions, human confirmation for high-stakes actions, and monitoring of agent behavior. OWASP’s AI Agent Security Cheat Sheet goes further, identifying agent-specific risks including prompt injection, tool abuse and privilege escalation, data exfiltration and memory poisoning.

In-browser agents are a better deal, because a human is watching the same screen and can catch a mistake before it lands. But the model, the tone and the decision logic are still outside your hands. For  or any other regulated industry, that is not a risk to take lightly just to pursue reach you have not yet learned how to govern.

What you actually gain by building at home

An on-site agent is less glamorous than the idea of your product being discovered by roaming agents across the open web. But it is the only home where the business keeps full governance.

You choose the model. You define the guardrails. You decide the tone, the escalation paths and exactly what the agent is and is not allowed to promise a customer. Because the agent has direct access to your systems, it does not need to reverse-engineer your checkout flow as an outside agent would. It can be given your actual domain knowledge and your actual APIs.

That matters because enterprises have solved this problem before. They did not expose databases directly to the internet; they introduced APIs. APIs were not just about integration. They created contracts, authentication, auditing and policy enforcement. On-site agents represent a similar evolution. Rather than forcing an external agent to infer behavior from a user interface, a business can expose governed capabilities through tools with explicit contracts.

WebMCP is a promising step in that direction. It makes it easier for a site to publish actions an agent can invoke, instead of forcing the agent to guess at the page. The important shift is not that the agent can click a button. It is that every action becomes observable, policy-governed and replayable.

The Chrome team’s WebMCP Sports demo is a good preview of what this can look like done well: an on-site assistant calling the site’s own WebMCP tools, with every call visible in the chat log. That is not a black box you are hoping behaves. It is an auditable interaction, with named tools and defined contracts.

The three homes

The cleanest way to think about this is as a spectrum.

  • On-site. The agent lives on your website. You ship it. You own the model, the tools, the tone, the policies and the telemetry. It has first-party access to your systems and your workflows. The trade-off is reach: it is coupled to your site, and it is not meant to carry the user’s journey across the web.
  • In-browser. The agent lives inside the user’s browser session, usually as a co-browsing extension or a browser-integrated assistant. It benefits from the user’s logged-in state and can act with the user present. That gives it real reach and a strong human safety net. But the business does not control the model or the guardrails, and the agent can still misrepresent the brand.
  • Off-browser. The agent runs elsewhere — in the cloud, on a server or on a user’s local machine and reaches your business by talking to APIs or driving a browser remotely. This is the widest-reach model, but also the least governed from the business’s point of view. It may compare competitors, cross workflows and act at scale, but you do not control the experience.

None of these homes is inherently bad. They solve different problems. But if your first priority is governance, accountability and brand integrity, on-site is the right starting point.

Start with the governed interface

For teams deciding where to put their first investment, three moves make the difference between a real interface and a chatbot glued to a homepage.

First, ship the on-site agent as the authoritative interface, not a fallback. It should have first-class access to your own APIs and domain knowledge — the same systems your support team and checkout flow already use — rather than being handed a scraped version of your own page.

Second, instrument every tool call it makes. If your agent calls a WebMCP tool to check inventory or apply a discount, log it the way you would log an API call from any other client. That log is your audit trail, your debugging tool and eventually your evidence when a regulator or customer asks what happened.

Third, design for human escalation from day one. Even a well-governed agent should not make every decision autonomously. Build explicit handoff paths to human operators for ambiguous or high-risk situations.

Taken together, those choices turn an on-site agent into a governed interface rather than a novelty feature. That distinction matters. The first is something an enterprise can safely operate; the second is something it will eventually have to defend.

When agents start talking to agents

There is another reason to build the on-site agent first: the three homes are unlikely to remain isolated.

Imagine that a user’s browser agent arrives at an airline website. It already knows the traveler’s preferences, calendar constraints, loyalty programs and perhaps their budget. The airline’s on-site agent knows something completely different: routes, seat availability, fare rules, upgrade eligibility and the airline’s operational policies.

Why should the visiting agent reverse-engineer all of that from a website?

A more natural architecture may be for the two agents to communicate.

This is no longer purely hypothetical. The Agent2Agent (A2A) protocol is explicitly designed to allow independent agents built by different vendors and frameworks to discover capabilities, exchange information, delegate work and coordinate tasks.

In that world, the user’s agent brings intent and user context. The site’s agent brings domain knowledge and governed execution.

And suddenly the on-site agent’s limited reach does not look quite so limiting. It does not need to travel across the web if other agents can come to it.

The incentive problem nobody is pricing in yet

There is a harder question underneath the technical one: who does the on-site agent actually work for?

A visiting agent, co-browsing or otherwise, is acting on the user’s behalf. An on-site agent, however well-built, is the business’s employee. And the moment the two negotiate a discount, an upgrade or a substitution, that exchange stops looking like a neutral handoff and starts looking like a sales conversation with an AI on each side of the table.

That tension is going to matter.

Businesses building on-site agents now should design their guardrails with that scrutiny in mind, rather than treating “the agent decided” as a shield. Control is worth having. It is also a responsibility. And building the agent that answers to you is the only way to exercise it.

The first agent should be the one you can govern

The history of enterprise software suggests a familiar pattern. Organizations adopt new interaction models by first bringing them under their own governance. Internal systems become APIs. APIs become platforms. Platforms become ecosystems.

AI agents will likely follow the same path.

That is why I think the first agent your business builds should not be the one that can reach the entire web. It should be the one whose behavior you can understand, measure and improve. Once that foundation exists, expanding outward becomes an architectural choice instead of a leap of faith.

Reach is tempting. But for regulated and brand-sensitive businesses, control has to come first.

❌