James Webb Space Telescope (JWST) data have revealed hidden stars that astronomers say are unexpectedly increasing the mass of early galaxies.

JWST‘s ability to see deep into the cosmos gives astronomers insight into the early universe and challenges prior expectations of what they would find there. Now,  an international team led by astronomers from the Netherlands’ Leiden University recently reported the discovery of new stars in a paper published in Nature Astronomy.

With the discovery of these many previously unknown small stars, the researchers say astronomers may need to reconsider the expected mass of these early galaxies, as JWST reveals unexpected levels of development shortly after the Big Bang.

James Webb Space Telescope Observations

For their new work, the astronomers focused on nine massive galaxies in the early universe that had completed their main star-formation period. They combined JWST data with earlier observations from the Very Large Telescope in Chile, operated by the European Southern Observatory.

Spectroscopy is a crucial element of JWST data, breaking light down into separate spectra that allow astronomers to study stars and even planetary atmospheres across extreme distances. However, the smaller, fainter stars revealed in this new research can be much harder to detect than the brighter, more powerful ones. 

“If a galaxy were a city, the brightest stars would be the skyscrapers you can immediately see from far away,” said first author Chloe Cheng. “Our models show that behind the brightest stars there is a much larger population of small stars, like houses among the skyscrapers. This means that the galaxy as a whole is much more massive than previous estimates suggested.”

Stellar Birth

Working with data limited by the sensitivity of tools, researchers previously were unable to see as many smaller stellar objects. Researchers then assumed a similar ratio of small to large stars across the universe, which these new findings are now challenging.

Instead, they found ancient massive galaxies filled with many more small stars than previously expected, and far more than in our own Milky Way galaxy today, which is a smaller galaxy. The mass differences produced by this glut of tiny stars increased the expected mass of the galaxy under 1.5 billion years old by fourfold. 

“Measurements like these were simply not possible until recently,” explained co-author Martje Slob. “We needed not only a telescope capable of collecting enough light, but also exceptionally high-quality spectra and new analysis techniques. Only then could we reliably distinguish the subtle features of small stars from the light of much brighter stars.”

JWST Discoveries

Launched almost five years ago, JWST has continually defied what astronomers expected to find in the ancient universe. It turns out that the universe shortly after the Big Bang was more massive and had undergone more development than previously considered possible. The new findings add to those ongoing discoveries.

“This result shows that much more mass than we thought is hidden in small stars,” said study lead Professor Mariska Kriek. “It has implications for many areas of astronomy. Small stars often have planets orbiting them, so if there were many more small stars in the early Universe than we thought, there may also have been more planets.”

To follow up on this exciting discovery, the team plans to look even further back into the universe’s past in future observations that will study some of the universe’s very earliest stars.

The paper, “Hidden Mass in Early Galaxies Revealed by Bottom-Heavy Initial Mass Functions,” appeared in Nature Astronomy on August 18, 2026.

Ryan Whalen covers science and technology for The Debrief. He holds an MA in History and a Master of Library and Information Science with a certificate in Data Science. He can be contacted at ryan@thedebrief.org.

Editor’s Note: Astrobites is a graduate-student-run organization that digests astrophysical literature for undergraduate students. As part of the partnership between the AAS and astrobites, we occasionally repost astrobites content here at AAS Nova. We hope you enjoy this post from astrobites; the original can be viewed at astrobites.org.

Title: Unbreaking the Universe: MINERVA Measurements of Color Gradients in Massive Quiescent Galaxies Can Help Ease Too-Early Star Formation Tensions
Authors: Sam E. Cutler et al.
First Author’s Institution: Tufts University
Status: Published in ApJL

Universe Breakers

JWST launched in 2021, and one of its key goals was to observe the first galaxies as they formed. Early results from JWST found something surprising: extremely massive galaxies in the early universe that had “quenched,” or stopped making new stars, much faster than was expected. These early results led some to believe that our understanding of how quickly massive galaxies can form and quench was fundamentally wrong.

Before concluding that our understanding of the universe is broken, it’s important to find other reasons why we might see very massive galaxies in the early universe. One theory is that these galaxies are actually less massive than we think. To “weigh” a galaxy, astronomers first measure the amount of light being emitted by that galaxy. If all the light in a galaxy comes from stars (which should be true in the early universe, though active black holes can contribute a lot of light in some galaxies), you can infer the total number of stars by accounting for the average amount of light emitted per star of a certain mass; this is called the “mass-to-light ratio.” Since massive stars emit a lot more light than low-mass stars, and high-mass stars die out faster than low-mass stars, the mass-to-light ratio is higher for older stellar populations. To accurately “weigh” a galaxy, scientists therefore need both a good measurement of the total amount of light in the galaxy and how old its stellar population is. The authors of today’s article suggest that the uncertainty in these measurements might be leading to overestimates of galaxy masses and underestimates of galaxy star formation rates, possibly explaining the existence of the earliest massive quiescent (non-star-forming) galaxies.

The Impact of Color Gradients

Previous works about the massive quiescent galaxies in this study used spectroscopy to determine the galaxies’ masses and star formation rates. These spectra were taken with a “slit,” which introduces a source of error: if the slit is smaller than the image of the galaxy, some of the galaxy’s light will be missed in the spectrum. Astronomers usually correct for this by checking how much of the total light of a galaxy image is covered by the slit and scaling up the spectrum to account for the missing light, but this correction assumes that the spectrum is basically the same across the entire galaxy.

However, this assumption is rarely correct. In the local universe, star-forming spiral galaxies like the Milky Way tend to be made of a central “bulge” surrounded by a “disk” (see Figure 1). The bulge is no longer actively forming new stars, leading to a red-to-blue color gradient as you move out from the center of the galaxy. In astronomy, this is considered a “negative” color gradient. A slit that only covers the galaxy center would lead to an overall overestimate of the stellar mass and underestimate of the star formation rate. If the galaxies instead had a positive color gradient, with more star formation in the center of the galaxy, the mass would be underestimated and the star formation rate would be overestimated. Galaxies with both positive and negative color gradients have been found in the distant universe. By measuring the color gradient for each individual galaxy in their sample, the authors can correct the mass and star formation rate calculations from spectra taken with a slit spectrograph.

Results

Instead of using spectra, the authors of today’s article use imaging in different filters to measure color gradients for a sample of four galaxies in the early universe that had previously been found to be extremely massive and no longer forming stars. They use medium-band filters, or filters that let in only a small part of a galaxy’s spectrum, to produce a spectral energy distribution at each radius. This spectral energy distribution is less informative than a spectrum (think a handprint versus a fingerprint), but it’s detailed enough to model the likely stellar population at each radius to determine whether the galaxies have positive, negative, or no color gradients, allowing for better corrections to the properties measured from the galaxies’ centers. They also model the stellar population from the central part of the galaxy that would normally be covered by a slit, as well as from the actual spectrum, to test whether any differences in their results come from their choice of modeling techniques.

The authors find that three of the four galaxies have a negative color gradient in at least some areas. The fourth galaxy has a relatively flat color gradient, though this measurement is less certain due to the object’s redshift. When the authors plot the galaxies’ colors on a diagnostic diagram that separates red and old galaxies from young and blue galaxies, they find that three of the four galaxies have centers that appear red and old but outskirts that appear young and blue (Figure 2). This means previous measurements of the mass may have been overestimated, and previous measurements of the star formation rate may have been underestimated.

Next, the authors model the stellar ages across the galaxies using spectral energy distribution modeling. This technique compares the measured spectral energy distribution to libraries of stellar spectra, rules about how different dust or chemical composition impact galaxy appearance, and observational effects to predict the actual stellar makeup of a galaxy. In this case, the authors can’t know for sure whether the redder colors at galaxy centers come from an older stellar population, more dust, or changes in the chemical composition (the so-called “dust–age–metallicity degeneracy”). To account for this, the authors try modeling the stellar population two ways: once by assuming all change in color comes from a change in stellar age, and again by allowing the dust and chemical composition of the galaxy to change with radius. They find that if only the stellar age varies across the galaxy, age gradients in the galaxy stellar population can bring the estimated galaxy masses and star formation rates back toward agreement with models of galaxy evolution in the early universe, though not all the way. However, allowing dust and chemical composition to change across the face of the galaxy lead to higher stellar masses and less star formation, meaning the mystery may not yet be solved.

Is the Universe Broken?

To determine whether these galaxies still count as “universe breakers,” the authors use a cosmological model to predict the largest expected galaxy mass in the observed area at different periods in cosmic time. The previous results had less than a 0.3% chance of occurring under current cosmological models; with their updated numbers and stellar population models, the authors find that the observed galaxies sometimes have more than a 5% chance of occurring, though there is still tension. They point out that their analysis ignores processes that could help galaxies grow and quench in the early universe, like galaxy mergers; still, the existence of these massive galaxies with such low star formation rates remains a puzzle.

Original astrobite edited by Ansh Gupta.

About the author, Margaret Verrico:

I am a fourth-year graduate student at the University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign. I study the connection between supermassive black hole transients and their host galaxies. I am also an avid knitter and reader, and I am passionate about opening up STEM opportunities for people of all backgrounds.

The post Galaxies of Many Colors appeared first on AAS Nova.