Scientists have measured antineutrino emissions from spent nuclear fuel for the first time, demonstrating that monitoring efforts need not stop when the reactors do. This is important because although independent nuclear safeguarding agencies have long used antineutrino emissions to glean information on reactor operations, previous detection schemes only worked when the reactors were running. Now, however, members of the Double Chooz collaboration have shown that it is possible to detect residual antineutrino emissions during a complete reactor shutdown – including from spent fuel stored in cooling pools.

Like neutrinos, antineutrinos are tiny, nearly massless fundamental particles that come in three flavours: electron, muon and tau. The largest human-made sources of electron antineutrinos are the reactor cores of nuclear power plants, which produce them via beta decay of neutron-rich fragments that are primarily generated during the fission of heavy elements such as uranium and plutonium.

Because antineutrinos interact so rarely with other particles, their emissions cannot be shielded and their signatures cannot be altered. They can also be detected some distance from the power plant itself. All these features make them valuable for nonintrusive nuclear reactor monitoring. Indeed, the idea of using antineutrinos to provide real-time information about the fissile content of a reactor core – and thereby detect illicit production of material that could be used in nuclear weapons manufacturing – dates back to the 1970s.

When a reactor is shut down, long-lived fission products (found in burnt fuel assemblies that remain in the reactor core, as well as assemblies that were previously removed and stored in nearby cooling pools) continue to decay, producing a residual neutrino flux. However, this residual signal is only around 1% as strong as the signal from an operating reactor. It also lies in a region of the energy spectrum that is strongly affected by background activities.

Measuring the residual neutrino flux and its energy spectrum

In the new work, which is detailed in Physical Review Letters, a team led by Thierry Lasserre and Anthony Onillon from the Max-Planck-Institut für Kernphysik (MPIK) in Heidelberg, Germany, succeeded in measuring the residual neutrino flux and its energy spectrum despite these difficulties. They obtained their data from the Double Chooz neutrino detection experiment, which is located near the two 4.25 GWth cores of the Chooz B nuclear power plant in the French Ardennes. This experiment uses a pair of detectors – labelled “near” and “far” and located around 400 m and 1.05 km from the cores – to study a fundamental parameter called the 𝜃₁₃ neutrino mixing angle that describes how neutrinos transform between different types as they travel.

The Chooz plant uses a pair of pressurized water reactors, each of which contains 205 fuel assemblies consisting of roughly 600 kg of enriched uranium dioxide (mainly ²³⁸U with a few percent of ²³⁵U). During operation, these reactors also produce additional fissile isotopes, ²³⁹Pu and ²⁴¹Pu, through neutron capture and subsequent decay processes involving ²³⁸U. In a typical cycle, they operate at full power for over a year and are then shut down for six to eight weeks for refuelling. During this time, some of the spent fuel assemblies are removed and transferred to storage pools in a nearby building.

The Double Chooz neutrino detector consists of more than 30 m³ of liquid scintillator, which is a material that emits short, double flashes of light when an antineutrino hits it. The outer part of the detector is shielded from the background radiation of the surrounding mountain rocks by 15 cm of demagnetized steel for the far detector and 1 m of water for the near detector. The inner part of the detector is shielded by a thick layer of mineral oil. Finally, an outer “muon veto” consisting of segmented scintillator modules positioned above the detector eliminates contributions from cosmic muons that can mask the signal from the antineutrinos.

Over 100 events observed

The researchers collected their data in 2017 when both of Chooz’s reactors were simultaneously shut down for 24.4 days for refuelling and maintenance. This unusual double shutdown was long enough for the team to obtain the statistics and low background signals needed to extract, for the first time, a quantitative residual reactor antineutrino spectrum.

After accounting for muon veto-induced dead time, the researchers clocked up 17.2 days of measurements for the near detector and 22.2 days for the far detector. While they analysed data from both, they mainly focused on the near detector because it is closer to the reactor cores and spent fuel pools and is therefore more sensitive to the residual antineutrino flux.

In the 1–3 MeV range, where the residual neutrino signal is strongest, the researchers observed 106 ±18 events, which represents a 5.9 σ excess over the background. This value, they say, is in very good agreement with the 88 ±7 events predicted by detailed simulations of the remaining nuclear fuel inventory and the decay of long-lived fission products.

According to the researchers, this result had a long gestation period: “In 2003, the IAEA safeguards met with the neutrino community and raised a question: could antineutrinos also provide information on spent nuclear fuel?

“The main difficulty has been detecting the faint residual antineutrino signal. This meant obtaining data during periods when both Chooz reactors were simultaneously off, very low and well-controlled detector backgrounds, and a detailed simulation of the irradiation and cooling history of relevant fuel assemblies.”

The researchers hope that their result will become a robust benchmark for agencies and experimenters designing detectors for specific spent-fuel monitoring applications. “Such monitoring is feasible and could provide an independent, non-intrusive complement to reactor-status and spent fuel inventory,” they tell Physics World, though they add that “it will not necessarily be easy, compact or inexpensive to implement.”

The post Antineutrino detector could monitor spent nuclear fuel for clandestine activity appeared first on Physics World.

Could a mirror world – in which every type of elementary particle has a corresponding mirror particle – exist in parallel to our ordinary world? For now, the answer is probably no, but in exploring this question, physicists at the Ultracold Neutron (UCN) Physics Group at the Paul Scherrer Institute (PSI) in Switzerland, say they have refuted this hypothesis with the best precision yet. Their work, which involved looking for so-called neutron-to-mirror-neutron transitions, also excludes mirror neutrons as potential components of dark matter, the mysterious substance thought to make up over 25% of the universe’s mass. Dark matter has never been detected directly, but its existence is inferred through observed gravitational interactions.

Theoretical physicists put forward the idea of a mirror world as long ago as the 1950s to address problems related to parity symmetry conservation in particle physics. Here, a set of mirror particles would exist as exact duplicates of their ordinary particle counterparts except that their so-called handedness would be reversed. In this picture, particles like the electron e, proton p and neutron n have mirror partners denoted by e′, p′ and n′. These mirror particles would have almost the same mass as the ordinary particles.

Not easy to detect

Finding proof for the existence of this mirror matter is important as it could account for dark matter – provided that during the evolution of the universe mirror matter was cooler than ordinary matter. Mirror matter is not easy to detect, however, because mirror particles are predicted to interact with ordinary matter in only two ways. The first is via the force of gravity and the second is through the rare oscillation of neutral particles such as neutrons that “mix” with their mass-degenerate mirror partners. This, explains Bernhard Lauss, one of the physicists at the PSI’s Center for Neutron and Muon Sciences who led this new study, means that ordinary neutrons might, on very rare occasions, turn into their mirror particles and simply “vanish” from our world. The time period up to this event is known as the n−n′ oscillation time, and afterwards a neutron could even reappear as if out of nowhere.

Neutron-to-mirror-neutron mixing has been predicted to have an n−n′ oscillation time as small as few tens of seconds, but it is not easily detectable because it is suppressed by environmental factors such as the presence of ordinary and/or mirror matter or of ordinary and/or mirror magnetic fields.

In recent years, researchers have been trying to reduce these environmental effects by studying neutrons cooled to extremely low temperatures. There are only a few laboratories around the world that can produce such ultracold neutrons at high regular flux. One is the Institut Laue–Langevin (ILL) in Grenoble, France, and another is the PSI.

Unexplored regions

The results from a series of experiments at the ILL in the past 20 years conducted at various magnetic fields were interpreted as being anomalous signals in the range of magnetic fields at which n−n′ oscillations could take place, thereby rekindling interest in the existence of mirror neutrons. More recently, the nEDM collaboration at PSI excluded a big part of this magnetic field range, but some magnetic field regions remain unexplored.

In the latest work, Lauss together with his colleague Géza Zsigmond and co-workers from PSI, the ETH Zurich and the Jagiellonian University in Krakow used ultracold neutrons from the PSI UCN source produced via a technique called superthermal moderation in a deuterium crystal cooled down to a temperature of 5 K. The researchers trapped these neutrons in a non-magnetic vessel made of stainless steel under vacuum. They were able to trap an unprecedented number of neutrons – on the order of 25 billion in all – something that allowed them to significantly improve the sensitivity of such experiments. A set of eight rectangular coils surrounding the storage vessel was used to generate a magnetic field that could be precisely controlled and scanned over two orders of magnitude, from 5–109 µT.

The team released around 1.5 million neutrons from the storage vessel into a gas-electron-multiplier based UCN-detector every six minutes to count how many neutrons remained in the tank after being stored there for 200 s. The researchers repeated the process over a period of several months, gradually varying the strength and flipping the direction of the magnetic field to scan all the relevant fields over which oscillations between neutrons and mirror neutrons are expected to occur. Finally, they performed complex computational simulations on the EULER cluster at the ETH Zurich to predict theoretical probabilities of n-n’ transitions that they then compared with the neutron losses they measured.

New limits set

The result? The researchers say they saw no evidence for such oscillations under the tested conditions. This finding, explains Lauss, means that there is a “very high probability” that previous speculations about the transformation of neutron particles into their mirror counterparts can be ruled out and that new limits for the n−n′ oscillation time constant have now been set. “Indeed, we have excluded the parameter space previously claimed for potential signals to 99.98 %,” he explains.

“The result therefore also excludes mirror neutrons as relevant dark matter particles,” Lauss tells Physics World.

Despite the existing limits already being very tight, Lauss, Zsigmond and their colleagues say they now plan to study the n−n′ transitions theoretically expected at zero mirror-magnetic fields to establish even more stringent limits. “Improving sensitivity further will be very challenging though, and perhaps even impossible,” admits Zsigmond. “A twofold increase, for example, will require 16 times more neutrons because the sensitivity of the experiment scales with the fourth root of the neutron counts.”

The post No show again for mirror neutrons appeared first on Physics World.

Particles such as protons and neutrons are more accurately represented as “baryon junctions” than as simple collections of three quarks, say physicists. This finding, which is based on studies of heavy-ion collisions, is at odds with textbook descriptions, but it confirms a longstanding belief among many nuclear physicists that these descriptions are over-simplified.

Like charge and energy, baryon number is conserved in all experimentally observed reactions. This conservation law was first articulated in 1938, long before physicists developed the theory of quantum chromodynamics (QCD) to explain the behaviour of nuclei. It also predates the coinage of the term “quark” by Murray Gell-Mann in 1963.

Initially, theorists working on QCD felt that the simplest way to incorporate baryon number conservation was to assign a baryon number of 1/3 to every quark and -1/3 to every antiquark. As bound states of three quarks, protons and other baryons therefore have a baryon number of +1, antibaryons are -1, and quark-antiquark pairs, or mesons, are 0. However, this association of the baryon number with the quark – known as the valence quark model – is not fundamental to QCD, and as early as the 1970s theorists were already considering alternatives. In 1996, for example, Dmitri Kharzeev of Stony Brook University in New York, US proposed a model in which the baryon number was assigned not to the quarks themselves but to the Y-shaped junction in the gluon field that mediates their interactions.

At high-energy accelerators such as the LHC, collisions are usually modelled in the high-energy “perturbative QCD” regime. Here, quarks can be treated as isolated particles, and the two models are effectively equivalent. Inside a proton or in a quark-gluon plasma, however, quarks are more deeply immersed in the gluon field. This makes perturbative calculations such as those used in the theory of quantum electrodynamics (QED) impossible. “You can’t do these Feynman-like calculations anymore,” explains Anselm Vossen, an experimental nuclear physicist at Duke University in North Carolina, US. “Every diagram you write out has the same importance.” Within this so-called “lattice QCD” regime, the two models’ predictions can differ.

Discrepancies between models

In the new work, the STAR collaboration – which studies particles produced in quark-gluon plasmas generated at Brookhaven National Laboratory’s Relativistic Heavy Ion Collider (RHIC) in New York, US – homed in on these differences. By comparing predictions from the baryon junction model with those from the valence quark model in various scenarios, and matching them against experimental results, they hoped to find evidence to support one model over another.

First, they studied head-on collisions of gold nuclei, plus near-misses that led to the exchange of a virtual photon and the break-up of one nucleus. They found that the proportion of particles scattered varied sharply with the energy of the incoming nuclei, but not as the valence quark model predicted.

“The net baryons scattered decreases as the beam energy increases – that is expected – because the higher the energy the more things will just move straight through without being scattered to a large angle,” explains Chun Yuen Tsang, a STAR project leader who is now at Argonne National Laboratory in Illinois. However, he adds that the rate of decline “is actually slower than the existing valence quark model would have you believe”. A baryon junction should scatter more easily than a valence quark, so the fact that a simulation designed using the latter model underpredicts scattering at high energies points towards the baryon junction model.

A charged result

The researchers also compared fragments produced in collisions with zirconium-96 and rubidium-96 nuclei. Since both particles contain the same number of nucleons, they have the same baryon number. However, the ruthenium-96 nucleus has 44 protons, whereas the zirconium-96 nucleus has only 40, giving them different electric charges.

In a nuclear collision, both charge and baryon number – while being conserved overall – are rearranged among the fragments. The charge is localized to the quarks, so, according to the valence quark model, charge and baryon number should move approximately the same amount. Because the colliding nuclear pairs in this experiment differed only in their charge, the outcomes of collisions could be predicted relatively well across a range of energies. However, these predictions were strongly violated, with baryon number moving much more easily than electric charge. “This is evidence for quarks not being the carriers of both baryon number and electric charge,” Tsang says.

The researchers now wish to study collisions from other experiments. They also hope that the Electron-Ion Collider currently planned to replace RHIC will provide a more precise baryon probe and yield a definitive answer.

Vossen, who was not involved in the research, says that in some sense, its conclusions are “not that surprising”. His own research has examined the so-called “proton spin crisis” precipitated by the discovery that the proton’s spin cannot be explained by the spin of its constituent quarks, while the proton’s mass is much greater than the sum of the quark masses. “It’s part of this general picture that shows that a proton is much more complex than three valence quarks,” he says. Nevertheless, he says the STAR findings are not trivial: “It’s still a very interesting result,” he concludes.

The work is published in Science.

The post Protons and neutrons are more than just groups of three quarks appeared first on Physics World.