Models of the insect’s nervous system have been trained to solve a Rubik’s Cube, play video games and even parallel park a car.

Models of the insect’s nervous system have been trained to solve a Rubik’s Cube, play video games and even parallel park a car.

Elephants struggled when scientists changed the rules but then adapted surprisingly fast.

💾

💾

From fireflies to mammals, evolution may have tuned communication to the rhythm of neurons.

Any dog owner would tell you that their canine companions are attuned to their humans' emotional state and respond accordingly. Scientists have performed fMRI scans on dogs and identified a specific brain region that processes happy human facial expresses, like a smile, according to a new paper published in the journal iScience. They also found that dogs can tell the difference between negative facial expressions, specifically anger, sadness, and fear.

“Humans are really good at picking up small details on the face, and so are dogs,” said co-author Raúl Hernández-Pérez of the University of Vienna. “This makes dogs very interesting. By studying their brains, we can understand what adaptations have developed to support their remarkable social and emotional understanding of humans.”

Prior behavioral studies have shown that dogs are sensitive to emotion in human faces. Dogs will, for example, choose a box their human has identified with a happy expression over one the human treats with fear or disgust. Past fMRI studies found that an area in the canine left temporal cortex showed a stronger response to human faces compared to dog faces, as well as a greater response in the caudate, hippocampus, and amygdala to human faces showing emotion versus neutral faces.

Read full article

Comments

© Laura V. Cuaya/CC BY-SA

Any dog owner would tell you that their canine companions are attuned to their humans' emotional state and respond accordingly. Scientists have performed fMRI scans on dogs and identified a specific brain region that processes happy human facial expresses, like a smile, according to a new paper published in the journal iScience. They also found that dogs can tell the difference between negative facial expressions, specifically anger, sadness, and fear.

“Humans are really good at picking up small details on the face, and so are dogs,” said co-author Raúl Hernández-Pérez of the University of Vienna. “This makes dogs very interesting. By studying their brains, we can understand what adaptations have developed to support their remarkable social and emotional understanding of humans.”

Prior behavioral studies have shown that dogs are sensitive to emotion in human faces. Dogs will, for example, choose a box their human has identified with a happy expression over one the human treats with fear or disgust. Past fMRI studies found that an area in the canine left temporal cortex showed a stronger response to human faces compared to dog faces, as well as a greater response in the caudate, hippocampus, and amygdala to human faces showing emotion versus neutral faces.

Read full article

Comments

© Laura V. Cuaya/CC BY-SA

CapuchinAI, a portable testing station equipped with a touch screen and facial recognition software, could help scientists study primate intelligence in the wild.

In a groundbreaking study recently published in eLife, researchers have unveiled compelling evidence that female North American mountain chickadees, a species traditionally characterized by socially monogamous mating systems, selectively seek out males exhibiting superior spatial cognitive abilities for extra-pair copulations. This revelation adds a fascinating dimension to our understanding of mating behavior and cognitive evolution in wild avian species, highlighting the intricate interplay between cognitive traits and reproductive strategies.

The study centers on mountain chickadees, non-migratory birds inhabiting temperate environments, renowned for their reliance on sophisticated spatial navigation to store and retrieve food caches. These birds’ survival depends heavily on their capacity for spatial learning and memory, making them an ideal model to investigate the role of cognitive function in mating preferences. By focusing on this species, the research addresses a critical question: do female birds prioritize cognitive skills of potential mates, beyond social pair bonds, to maximize reproductive success?

To quantify spatial cognition, the researchers engineered an innovative experimental setup involving ‘smart’ feeder arrays configured to dispense sunflower seeds at unique locations, individualized for each tagged chickadee. By systematically tracking how many errors each male made in locating their designated food source, the team accurately gauged spatial learning efficiency and memory retention. This mechanistic approach enabled an objective assessment of cognitive performance under naturalistic conditions, bypassing subjective behavioral observations.

Over the course of three breeding seasons, the research team meticulously documented parentage using genetic analyses to detect the prevalence and paternal identity of extra-pair offspring. Their findings revealed that nearly 70% of nests contained offspring sired by males other than the social partner, with approximately one-third of sampled chicks resulting from such extra-pair copulations. Notably, males demonstrating superior spatial cognition sired significantly more extra-pair young, suggesting these cognitive traits confer a conspicuous reproductive advantage.

Importantly, the data showed that males excelling in spatial tasks could sire between six and seven extra-pair offspring annually, dwarfed not by age but by cognitive prowess. This finding disrupts conventional assumptions that reproductive success correlates linearly with age or physical dominance, positioning advanced cognitive abilities as a pivotal determinant in extra-pair mating dynamics. Females appear to leverage these abilities when selecting mates beyond their social partner, potentially securing superior genetic quality for their progeny.

Further analyses indicated that males with higher cognitive scores did not suffer reproductive deficits within their social nests, maintaining comparable clutch sizes and chick mass relative to cuckolded males. Intriguingly, cognitive superiority was associated with heavier offspring overall, which likely translates to increased survival probabilities and long-term fitness benefits. Thus, spatial cognition appears to enhance male reproductive success both directly and indirectly.

Exploring female factors, the study unveiled a compelling pattern: females exhibiting lower spatial cognitive capabilities were more prone to have extra-pair young. This suggests a strategic response where cognitively limited females seek extra-pair copulations as an adaptive mechanism to compensate for their own deficiencies, thereby securing mates with enhanced spatial abilities. This bidirectional cognitive dynamic underscores complex sexual selection pressures governing mate choice.

Crucially, the likelihood of social males being cuckolded did not directly relate to their cognitive performance. Instead, female choice driven by assessing alternative males’ spatial skills determined extra-pair mating outcomes. This decouples social pair bond stability from cognitive prowess, signaling selective pressures favoring cognitive traits beyond social fidelity. It also emphasizes the nuanced cognitive evaluation females employ during mate selection processes.

These findings have profound implications for evolutionary biology, particularly in understanding how cognitive characteristics influence sexual selection. By demonstrating that spatial cognitive abilities contribute to reproductive success and offspring viability, the study offers robust empirical evidence supporting natural selection acting on cognitive traits in natural populations, reinforcing the theory that cognitive evolution is intertwined with reproductive strategies.

Moreover, the research methodology blending fieldwork, engineered cognitive assessments, and genetic parentage analysis exemplifies a cutting-edge interdisciplinary approach. This allows researchers to unravel the subtle yet consequential behavioral and genetic factors shaping population dynamics in wild animals, paving the way for future studies investigating cognition’s role across diverse taxa.

Senior author Vladimir Pravosudov summarizes the significance: “Our results demonstrate that sexual selection extends into cognitive domains, with females preferring males whose spatial skills enhance offspring survival. This contributes to shaping cognitive evolution in species where spatial memory directly influences fitness.” The study thereby enriches our comprehension of how natural and sexual selection jointly sculpt complex traits like cognition.

In conclusion, the evidence presented calls for a paradigm shift in considering cognitive traits as central to mating strategies and reproductive fitness. This research not only deepens insights into mountain chickadee behavior but also broadens the evolutionary narrative, spotlighting cognition’s integral role in survival and reproductive success. Future explorations may unravel similar patterns in other species, expanding our grasp of the cognitive dimensions of sexual selection.

Subject of Research: Animals

Article Title: Male chickadees with better spatial cognition sire more extra-pair young

News Publication Date: 16-Jun-2026

Web References: http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.110905.1

Image Credits: Vladimir Pravosudov (CC BY 4.0)

Keywords: Ecology, Animals, Birds, Cognition, Spatial memory, Evolutionary biology, Natural selection

Despite having tiny brains, bumblebees have demonstrated a remarkable ability to socially learn how to use tools, solve simple puzzles, and cooperate to achieve a goal. It seems they can also solve object-manipulation tasks without any previous training, according to a new paper published in the journal Science. According to the authors, it's the first time this kind of spontaneous problem-solving has been demonstrated in an insect.

In 2024, Olli Loukola of the University of Finland co-authored a study demonstrating that bumblebees could cooperate to solve complex challenges. It's the kind of cognitive task scientists had previously only observed in large-brained mammals like humans and chimpanzees. Loukola et al. trained pairs of bees to push a Lego block to the middle of a mini-arena or push against a door at the end of a tunnel to get a reward.

The team noticed that the bees were more likely to engage in the tasks if their partners also participated, compared to untrained control groups. They concluded that bees can learn to solve novel cooperative tasks outside the hive and may even be intentionally working together, although the researchers cautioned that more detailed monitoring of the behavior was needed to fully understand the partners' roles.

Read full article

Comments

© Mikko Törmänen

Activists had sued in a bid to secure her the fundamental human right to bodily liberty. Zoo officials said she was well cared for and called the lawsuit frivolous.

In hours of underwater video footage from a New York aquarium, a beluga whale named Natasha stretches her neck, pirouettes, nods, and shakes her head in front of a two-way mirror. Her daughter Maris does much the same. According to a new study published in PLOS One, both animals show the behavioral hallmarks of mirror self-recognition—a cognitive ability long considered a marker of self-awareness, and one that had never before been documented in beluga whales.

If the result holds up, belugas join a remarkably short list. The mirror self-recognition test (MSR) has been passed, with varying degrees of confidence, by humans (starting around age two), a handful of great apes (chimps, bonobos, orangutans, and—somewhat contentiously—gorillas), Asian elephants, bottlenose dolphins, probably magpies, possibly orcas, and, if you can believe it, a cleaner wrasse. That's it. No dogs, no cats, no monkeys. Plenty of species we had assumed were self-aware have been tested and failed.

Looking at the mirror

So what is this test, exactly, and what is it supposed to tell us?

Read full article

Comments

© David Merron Photography