Saudi Arabia sits on the Rub’ al Khali, an unbroken sea of dunes roughly the size of France, and still puts sand on ships from Perth and the Firth of Forth to pour into its concrete. In 2023, according to World Bank trade data reviewed by Autonocion and OkDiario, the kingdom bought around $138,600 worth of Australian construction sand — about the price of a mid-range pickup truck, hauled across the Indian Ocean because the grains under Saudi feet are the wrong shape to hold a building up.

The problem is not the quantity. It is the geometry of each grain.

Why desert sand fails the concrete test

Concrete is mostly aggregate — sand and gravel — held together by a thin film of cement paste. For the paste to lock, the grains have to bite against one another edge to edge, wedging into the cement and into each other like pieces of a rough jigsaw. River sand and crushed quarry sand do this well because they are geologically young: recently broken from larger rock, jagged, angular, sharp-faced.

Desert sand behaves in the opposite way. Wind does not fracture grains; it polishes them. Over thousands of years of rolling and bouncing across dunes, each grain wears down into a smooth, near-spherical pellet. Dropped into a wet concrete mix, the grains act like ball bearings, sliding past one another instead of interlocking. The cured block ends up riddled with microscopic voids and weak seams.

You can build a garden wall with it. You cannot build a supertall tower.

Ren Wei, a postdoctoral fellow at the Norwegian University of Science and Technology, put the same problem plainly in a EurekAlert release on his team’s work: “The challenge is that desert sand is so fine-grained that it is not suitable as a fastener in concrete. In other words, the concrete will not be hard enough to be used in various construction projects.” His team has spent years trying to give the useless stuff a second life by binding it with wood lignin under heat and pressure — a workaround that only exists because ordinary Portland cement will not.

The scale of what sits under Saudi feet

The Empty Quarter covers roughly 650,000 square kilometres of the southern Arabian Peninsula. Some of its dunes climb more than 250 metres, taller than most skyscrapers the kingdom is trying to build. Every major construction site in Saudi Arabia sits within trucking distance of a dune field that could, in raw volume, bury the project many times over.

And yet the trade ledgers keep filling. The same World Bank data show Saudi Arabia imported roughly $1.22 million in non-metal-bearing natural sands in 2023, with the Australian line item nested inside. A separate category — silica and quartz sands used mainly in glass and specialist applications — brought in about $5.23 million, sourced from China, Belgium, the United States, India and the UAE.

The dollar figures are almost comically small. That $138,600 from Australia is not a fortune. The point is that a budget code exists at all. A country sitting on one of the largest sand deposits on Earth has a purchase order for sand shipped from Fremantle.

Salt, corrosion, and the second reason engineers refuse dune sand

Shape is only half the objection. Desert and beach grains often carry enough chloride to slowly corrode the steel reinforcement inside concrete — a slow-motion disaster for anything load-bearing. Reporting on the paradox by Ecoticias notes that salt content is one of the reasons even coastal sand cannot simply be substituted in.

Engineers have spent years trying to make dune sand behave. A team at Imperial College London developed Finite, a concrete alternative made from desert sand. There are patents for crushing and re-fracturing dune grains under enormous pressure just to give them edges again. None of it has displaced the cheapest fix on the table: put good sand on a boat.

What Dubai’s palm actually stands on

The clearest illustration is next door in the Emirates. The Palm Jumeirah, finished off the Dubai coast in 2006, was built out of roughly 94 million cubic metres of sand and rock. That sand did not come from the desert a few miles inland. It was dredged from specific patches of Persian Gulf seabed where the grain size was right, placed by GPS-guided vessels using a technique called rainbowing — spraying sand in an arc through the air onto the growing island. Dutch and Belgian dredging firms ran the operation around the clock for years.

The Burj Khalifa tells the same story going up. Its roughly 330,000 cubic metres of concrete were mixed with sand sourced from outside the UAE, because the local dunes could not deliver the required strength. The paradox of desert cities importing the material they appear to be standing on is baked into every Gulf skyline.

A global shortage of the ordinary

Saudi Arabia’s predicament is a sharper version of a shortage the whole planet now shares. Humans pull about 50 billion tonnes of sand and gravel out of the Earth every year, making them the most-extracted solid materials on the planet and, by UN accounting, the second-most-exploited natural resource after water. Demand for construction sand alone is projected to climb by up to 45 percent by 2060.

Nature replaces sand through erosion on geological timescales, far slower than construction crews dig it out. The UN Environment Programme calls the difference the sand gap, and it now stretches from Cambodian riverbeds to Sicilian beaches, with organised sand-mining operations documented across India and West Africa.

The mining is not a small business. A recent Eos editors’ vox on river-sand mining lays out the downstream damage: channel incision, collapsed banks, saltwater intrusion into aquifers, and delta shorelines that stop being replenished from upstream. The concrete in a Gulf tower is often paid for, ecologically, by a river mouth several thousand kilometres away.

Space Daily has covered the same paradox from the angle of Arabian geology, tracing how thousands of years of aeolian polishing wore the grains beyond usefulness. What changes when the story is told through trade data is the scale of the workaround: every megaproject is, somewhere in its bill of materials, a sand story with a very long supply line.

Why the Empty Quarter’s sand ended up so smooth

The Arabian Peninsula was not always this dry. Research published in the Nature family of journals has documented recurrent humid phases across Arabia over the past 8 million years, with rivers, lakes and grasslands appearing and disappearing on cycles tied to orbital changes. During dry stretches — including the last several thousand years — wind takes over as the dominant sculptor of the surface, and the grains it moves get progressively rounder.

The Empty Quarter’s sand is the end product. Sediment that has been reworked so many times by wind that its edges have been worn down almost to the atomic. The same grains that make the dunes photograph beautifully at sunset are the grains that will not bond to cement. Comparative morphology studies of construction sands — the sort catalogued in the Nature journal literature on sand sources — consistently rank aeolian dune grains at the bottom of the pile for angularity and surface texture.

The workarounds nobody has scaled yet

Ren Wei’s team at NTNU and the University of Tokyo have made a prototype they call Botanical Sand Concrete, or Sandcrete. Equal parts desert sand and powdered wood are combined at 180 °C in a double-plate hot-pressing machine, and the lignin in the wood — the same natural polymer that stiffens tree trunks — melts and glues the smooth grains together. New Atlas reported on the material last year, noting the blocks meet Japanese Industrial Standards for pavement bricks.

It is not a structural concrete. Wei has been careful about that. The team envisions indoor use and pavement stones, and points out that any environmental gain evaporates if Sandcrete itself has to be shipped across continents. “The production process is relatively simple, so in principle the material can be made in many places,” he told reporters covering the study’s release. “But we need to test more, including how it can withstand cold, before it can be used in Norway.”

Manufactured sand — crushed rock milled into angular fragments — behaves more like river material and is expanding inside Saudi Arabia’s domestic supply chain. Recycled concrete from demolished buildings can be crushed and reused. Neither has yet displaced the bulk carrier.

Where the sand actually comes from now

Australia ranks as the world’s second-largest sand exporter behind only the United States, shipping roughly $273 million worth in 2023 by the Observatory of Economic Complexity’s accounting. Ports like Jebel Ali in Dubai and Dammam in Saudi Arabia handle graded construction and silica sand quietly, in bulk carriers that look no different from the ones bringing in cars and electronics.

Scotland’s contribution is smaller in tonnage but old in reputation. Silica sand from quarries in the Scottish lowlands has moved into Middle Eastern markets for decades, prized for its consistency and low impurity content, and it turns up in specialist concrete mixes and glass production across the Gulf.

The pressure on riverine sources has begun to reach places that once looked untouched. A 2026 explainer in the Milwaukee Independent describes Great Lakes deposits being eyed as global sand shortages ripple into North America, with infrastructure projects from Southeast Asia to the Middle East pulling on inland reserves that were previously considered safe.

NEOM and the sand appetite still to come

Saudi Arabia’s ambitions are not slowing the appetite. NEOM, the Red Sea Project, Qiddiya, the Diriyah Gate redevelopment — each is one of the largest construction sites on the planet, and each is hungry for the angular, water-eroded sand the region does not have. The Red Sea Project’s plan for a large archipelago along the coast will need dredged marine aggregate on a scale that rivals the great Gulf reclamation schemes.

THE LINE, NEOM’s proposed 170-kilometre mirrored city, would be one of the most concrete-intensive projects in human history if built anywhere near its original specification. Every cubic metre of that concrete needs grains with corners.

The supply lines lengthen with the ambition. The polished dunes stay where they are, drifting slowly in the wind, useless to a cement mixer and unlikely to change.

A material paradox that keeps repeating

Saudi Arabia’s sand imports get passed around online as a fun bit of trivia, the kind of fact that sounds invented. It stops being a paradox the moment you understand how sand actually forms. Wind makes beautiful dunes and terrible concrete. Water makes ugly gravel and skylines.

Life Signs has spent time this year on other quiet contradictions in the natural world — honey that stays edible for three thousand years because of the chemistry of its own preservation, or sharks that will not breed until the 22nd century. The desert-sand paradox belongs on the same shelf. The material that seems most abundant is exactly the material that will not do the job, because the process that piled it up is the process that ruined it.

The bulk carriers keep coming. Ships loaded in Fremantle and Grangemouth cross into Dammam and Jeddah, offload sand that spent geological ages tumbling in rivers or sitting in a quarry, and the sand is poured into towers rising a few kilometres from dunes 250 metres tall. Somewhere in the Empty Quarter tonight, wind is rolling another grain half a millimetre across the crest of a dune, wearing off another atomic layer, making it that much smoother, and that much more useless for the city being built next door.

The post Saudi Arabia sits on the world’s largest sand desert and yet imports sand by the shipload from Australia and Scotland, because the wind-rounded grains of the Empty Quarter are too smooth to bind in concrete and modern construction can only use the jagged sand pulled from riverbeds and quarries appeared first on Space Daily.

The Greenland shark, Somniosus microcephalus, grows at roughly one centimetre a year and does not reach sexual maturity until it is about 150 years old. That figure comes from a 2016 study in Science led by Julius Nielsen at the University of Copenhagen, which radiocarbon-dated the eye lenses of 28 female sharks caught as bycatch in the North Atlantic. A pup born in the cold water off Baffin Island this August will not be old enough to breed until sometime in the 2170s.

Read that sentence again. The pup’s first mating season will arrive more than a century and a half from now.

What the number actually means

One centimetre a year is a rate of growth so slow it barely registers on any human timescale. A shark that is 400 centimetres long — about the length of a small car — has been adding tissue at that pace since roughly the reign of Louis XV. The 2016 study found that the two largest sharks in the sample, at 493 and 502 centimetres, were estimated at around 335 and 392 years old.

The species’ average lifespan sits somewhere near 272 years. Individuals can plausibly push past 400. Only the ocean quahog clam, Arctica islandica, is known to live longer.

The one-centimetre figure is not a laboratory measurement in the usual sense. It is a rate inferred from recaptured sharks and from back-calculation against the radiocarbon ages of the eye lenses. One tagged Greenland shark has been documented growing only a small amount over more than a decade, which tells you something about why the biology of this animal has been so hard to pin down.

How you date a shark that has no growth rings

Most sharks can be aged by counting bands in their vertebrae, the way a forester reads a tree stump. Greenland sharks cannot. Their vertebrae are too soft and lay down no legible record.

So Nielsen’s team turned to the eye. The lens of a vertebrate eye grows in transparent layers throughout life, and the innermost tissue — the nucleus — is laid down before birth and never replaced. If you can extract that pre-natal tissue and measure its carbon-14 signature, you can locate roughly when the animal was born against the known atmospheric carbon record.

The technique works particularly well for sharks born after the mid-1950s because atmospheric nuclear weapons testing dumped a spike of carbon-14 into the environment. That spike, sometimes called the bomb pulse, shows up in the eye lenses of younger sharks and gives researchers a firm calibration point. Older animals sit below the pulse and their ages come with wider uncertainty bars — the oldest shark in the study was placed, with 95 percent certainty, somewhere between 272 and 512 years old.

That range is not a failure of the method. It is the honest shape of what radiocarbon dating can and cannot tell you about a creature that was alive before industrial carbon began skewing the atmosphere.

Why sexual maturity at 150 changes everything

Late maturity is the part of the story that reshapes how the species should be managed. A Greenland shark pup born in 2026 will spend its entire first century-and-a-half without contributing a single offspring to the population. If it dies at 140, it dies without ever having bred.

Compare that with smaller fish species that can mature in one to two years, or other shark species that mature within decades. Even other long-lived marine mammals reach sexual maturity far earlier in their lifespans.

For the Greenland shark, the reproductive clock runs on a scale that predates most nations. Any pressure on adult numbers — bycatch, warming, pollution — takes an unusually long time to show up in the population, and an even longer time to reverse. The slow replacement rate makes population recovery particularly challenging.

The animals a Greenland shark outlives

A shark born in the year the Great Fire of London burned would be about 360 today. One born the year Newton published the Principia in 1687 would be 339. A pup swimming under the ice off Svalbard right now will still be growing, if it survives, when the great-grandchildren of everyone reading this are old.

The shark shares this deep-time company with a small number of other animals that have taught biologists to distrust human intuitions about aging. Other long-lived species in cold northern waters provide similar insights into extreme longevity.

The Greenland shark is a different case. It ages, it slows, it eventually dies. It just does all of this at a rate that makes the human life-cycle look like a mayfly’s.

What the cold has to do with it

Greenland sharks live in water between minus 2 and 7 degrees Celsius, at depths that can reach 7,200 feet. They are extremely slow swimmers, moving at a pace that allows prey like seals to easily outpace them, and their tissues are laced with compounds that behave like antifreeze.

Cold and slow are the two variables that keep coming up in animals that live for centuries. Cold probably plays a role in extreme vertebrate longevity but is unlikely to be the whole story. Plenty of short-lived species share the same water.

Something else is going on inside those muscles. The Greenland shark’s cells have been contracting, dividing, and repairing themselves continuously since long before the theory of evolution was written down. Whatever biochemical maintenance keeps that machinery running is one of the more interesting open questions in the biology of aging.

What the study does not show

The 2016 Science paper sampled 28 females caught as bycatch. It did not sample males. It did not follow individuals across their lives — no one has, because no one lives long enough. The one-centimetre-per-year growth rate is an inference, and the 150-year figure for sexual maturity is estimated from the length at which females are first observed carrying developing pups, cross-referenced against the age-length relationship the eye-lens data produced.

That is the best evidence available. It is not the same as a longitudinal record. The upper age estimate of 392 years carries an uncertainty of roughly plus or minus 120 years, which is a window wider than the entire history of Australian federation.

The lower bound is the interesting number for conservation. Even at 272 years, the Greenland shark is the longest-lived vertebrate ever documented, and its late maturity is not in serious dispute.

What a 150-year adolescence looks like in practice

A female Greenland shark spends her first century-and-a-half in the dark, slow water of the North Atlantic and Arctic, eating what she can find. Stomach contents recorded by researchers have included fish, squid, and seals, along with occasional carrion.

She is often functionally blind, because a tiny crustacean parasite latches onto her cornea and scars it. This does not seem to inconvenience her much. In waters that dark, vision was never doing most of the work.

She grows a centimetre a year. She does not breed. She keeps moving.

By the time she reaches her 150th birthday, empires have risen and fallen at the surface. She is finally large enough to reproduce. If she is lucky, she has another 150 or 250 years ahead of her.

The Icelandic footnote

Greenland shark meat is toxic when fresh — concentrations of trimethylamine oxide and urea in the tissue can cause vomiting, disorientation, and convulsions, effects that Icelanders have traditionally associated with improperly prepared shark meat. The traditional preparation is to bury the flesh, let it ferment for weeks, then hang it to dry for months. The result, kæstur hákarl, is eaten in small cubes and has a reputation for being one of the more challenging foods on Earth.

Every cube of it is old. A single serving may contain tissue from an animal that was born before the founding of the United States.

The pups being born this year

Female Greenland sharks give birth to litters of around ten pups, each about 40 centimetres long. The pups drift down into the cold water and begin the slow work of adding a centimetre a year.

The ones being born this August will not breed until the 2170s. By then, the ice cover of the Arctic will look different, the shipping lanes will run through waters that are currently frozen, and whatever species is still tracking sharks with radiocarbon will be reading a bomb pulse that has faded further into the background carbon record.

The shark will still be growing. A centimetre a year, in the dark, under the ice, on a clock that does not care.

The post The Greenland shark grows about one centimetre per year and does not reach sexual maturity until roughly age 150, meaning the pups being born in the North Atlantic this year will not breed until the 22nd century appeared first on Space Daily.

Roughly 150 kilometres north-west of Sydney, at the bottom of a narrow sandstone canyon in Wollemi National Park, stands a grove of trees with bark like bubbling chocolate and needles arranged in flat sprays. A 2020 census counted 89 wild plants across four sites in a single canyon system. Forty-six of them were mature. That is the entire wild population of the species, worldwide.

In September 1994, a New South Wales National Parks and Wildlife Service field officer named David Noble abseiled into that canyon on a weekend bushwalk. He came out with a sprig of foliage he could not place. Nothing matching it had ever been described alive. The nearest thing in the record was fossil pollen, and the oldest of that pollen was laid down about 90 million years ago.

What Noble had was Wollemia nobilis, a conifer whose family had been reduced, across most of the planet, to impressions in rock.

What Noble actually found

The canyon is one of hundreds cut into the sandstone tableland that spreads west from Sydney into the Blue Mountains and, further north, into the Wollemi wilderness. Most have never been walked. They are too narrow, too wet, too choked with ferns and fallen rock, and they only open up if you rope in from the rim.

Noble was an experienced canyoner who had explored hundreds of them. He stopped at the base of one drop, looked up at a stand of tall trees he did not recognise, snapped off a piece of foliage, and put it in his backpack. It was the bark that caught him first. The trunk surface of a mature Wollemi pine is knobbled and nodular, and the comparison that stuck in Australian coverage was Coco Pops. Speaking at the National Arboretum in Canberra two decades later, Noble made the point that the find turned on a coincidence of person and place. As The Canberra Times reported, he said it had to be the right person at the right time, because it is one thing to be out there canyoning and another to be paying attention to the flora while you are.

Back in Sydney, the sample defeated the standard keys. It matched nothing living. The tree was eventually described as a new species in a new genus in 1995 by three people: Wyn Jones, a National Parks naturalist; Jan Allen, a horticulturist at the Blue Mountains Botanic Garden; and Ken Hill, a botanist at the Royal Botanic Garden Sydney. The species name honours Noble.

The fossil link came from pollen rather than leaves. Grains almost identical to Wollemia pollen had been catalogued for decades under the name Dilwynites, recovered from oil-exploration cores across southern Australia and later from New Zealand, East Antarctica and Patagonia. The morphospecies that most closely resembles modern Wollemi pollen, Dilwynites granulatus, is traceable to the Turonian age of the Late Cretaceous, between 89.8 and 93.9 million years ago.

Nobody had known what plant produced it. The macrofossils were worse than useless, because Araucariaceae leaf and cone fragments are hard to tell apart and the Wollemia characters sit awkwardly between the two genera anyone had to compare them with. The pollen had a name. The tree did not.

Why the lineage was written off

The Araucariaceae are an ancient conifer family. Their close relatives, the monkey puzzles and Norfolk Island pines and kauris, were once widespread across Gondwana. Dilwynites pollen turns up in sediment laid down when Australia was still joined to Antarctica and both were still joined to South America.

Then the record thins. American Scientist traced the decline: the pollen peaked in abundance during the Paleocene and Eocene, then fell away steadily as the planet cooled and Australia drifted north into drier latitudes. The most recent known Dilwynites came out of two-million-year-old sediment beneath the floor of Bass Strait, between Tasmania and the mainland. That is the early Pleistocene. After it, nothing.

Two million years of silence is enough for any palaeobotanist to close the file, and the file stayed closed until 1994.

The technical term for what Noble found is a Lazarus taxon: a group known first from fossils, then found alive. The coelacanth, hauled up off East London in South Africa in 1938, is the famous marine example. The Wollemi pine is the botanical one, and the gap it closes is longer.

How forty-six trees survived when the rest of the family did not

The canyon that holds the wild grove is a specific kind of refuge. Deep, narrow, permanently shaded, fed by a creek. The walls block wind. The overhang blocks most of the direct sun. Temperature barely fluctuates across the year and the humidity stays high.

These are the conditions Australia’s east coast used to have across far more of its area. As the surrounding country turned into dry sclerophyll forest and in places semi-desert, most of the moisture-loving Cretaceous flora died back. A handful of tiny pockets, canyon floors and permanently damp gullies and cloud-catching mountain tops, kept the old conditions going.

The trees also have a trick. Wollemi pines coppice prolifically, throwing new trunks from a single below-ground root mass, with some individuals carrying more than forty stems. Individual trunks can pass 400 years. The root systems are far older. Genome resequencing published in 2023 found the population has been relictual since the last major glacial and drying period in Australia, around 120,000 years ago.

Fire is the standing threat. In January 2020, as the Gospers Mountain fire moved through Wollemi National Park, air tankers laid retardant ahead of the front and specialist remote-area firefighters were winched into the gorge by helicopter to set up an irrigation system that wet the ground fuels. Helicopters water-bucketed the fire edge as it closed. Around 90 per cent of the park burned. The grove came through it singed but alive.

The classified coordinates

The exact location of the wild stand has never been made public. New South Wales treats it the way it treats sensitive infrastructure: need-to-know, restricted access, penalties for trespass. The National Parks and Wildlife Service kept the 2020 firefighting operation quiet for the same reason, and only described it publicly after the fire had passed.

The concern is not theft. It is pathogens, and the concern is no longer hypothetical. Phytophthora cinnamomi, a soil-borne water mould that colonises and kills root systems, was detected in the largest subpopulation in 2005, and a second species, Phytophthora multivora, in 2009. Both are thought to have arrived on the footwear, clothing or equipment of unauthorised visitors. Infected mature trees have shown extensive stem and canopy dieback, though none is known to have died outright.

Rangers and approved researchers now follow a decontamination protocol that would not be out of place in a biosecurity lab, and are flown in and out to avoid tracking material along an approach path. Seed has been harvested from the canopy by helicopter.

The other structural weakness is genetic. For two decades after the discovery, repeated surveys could find no variation at all between wild individuals. Then researchers at the Royal Botanic Garden Sydney and the University of New South Wales sequenced whole chloroplast genomes from 65 trees covering all four wild sites. They found three chloroplast lineages, one dominant and two rare. It was the first variation ever detected in the species. It also confirmed how little there is.

Why the tree is now on sale in garden centres

The counterintuitive part of the conservation strategy is commercial propagation. Cuttings from the wild trees were rooted, grown on, and licensed to nurseries. Wollemi pines are now sold as ornamental garden trees in Australia, the United Kingdom, Europe, North America and Japan, and a share of the proceeds funds the recovery program.

The logic is simple. Every backyard specimen is an insurance policy. If the wild grove burns or the Phytophthora spreads, the species does not go with it. The nursery line is genetically narrow, mostly cloned from a handful of parents, but it exists in the thousands.

The serious conservation work is a step beyond that. Because the nursery trees carry so little of the wild variation, the Botanic Gardens of Sydney built a genetically diverse living collection at the Australian Botanic Garden Mount Annan, then shipped more than 170 saplings abroad to seed a metacollection. Six went into the ground at Bedgebury National Pinetum in Kent in 2023, with the rest distributed to 28 botanic gardens across the UK and Europe, plus five Australian gardens and one in Atlanta.

On the thirtieth anniversary of the discovery in September 2024, a backup collection went in at the Blue Mountains Botanic Garden Mount Tomah, and translocated populations inside Wollemi National Park were topped up to more than 835 saplings. A wild population of 89. A cultivated and translocated population in the thousands.

What ninety million years actually looks like

Try to hold the timescale. When the oldest Dilwynites pollen was settling into Australian sediment, the Atlantic was still opening. Flowering plants were a relatively new evolutionary experiment. Tyrannosaurus rex would not appear for more than another 20 million years. Australia was attached to Antarctica, and both were attached to South America.

The lineage was already old then.

It survived the asteroid strike at the end of the Cretaceous, apparently in small refugia. It survived the drying of the continent through the Miocene. It survived every glacial cycle of the Pleistocene. It survived roughly 65,000 years of Aboriginal land management and two centuries of European botanical surveying that concluded it did not exist.

It survived because one canyon stayed wet.

Before 1994 the working assumption in Australian botany was that the continent’s flora had been surveyed thoroughly enough that no large, distinctive, unknown tree could still be standing. The grove sits about a two-hour drive from the country’s largest city. Aircraft had flown over it. Bushwalkers had passed within kilometres of it for a century. Nobody had looked down into the right canyon. An earlier Space Daily piece worked through the tension that follows: the species needs public attention to be funded, and the population needs public ignorance to be safe.

The grove is doing about what it was doing on the morning of Noble’s abseil, and what it was doing for the two million years before anyone arrived to describe it. The adult trunks are slowly adding rings. New stems are coming up off the same root masses. Cones drop. The creek runs. The overhang holds back the sun. Somewhere on a New South Wales government server the coordinates sit in a restricted file, and a few dozen people know them.

The rest of us can go and look at the cultivated ones, at Kew, at Bedgebury, at Mount Annan, in a suburban backyard in Adelaide. The bark still knobbles the way it did in the canyon. The needles still come off in flat sprays. The tree is still doing what it was doing when the pollen that would become its only record was drifting down into a Cretaceous seabed.

It just took someone with a rope to notice.

The post In 1994, a bushwalker rappelling into a sandstone canyon 150 kilometres from Sydney found a stand of trees with waxy bubbled bark that matched fossils 90 million years old, and the Wollemi pine turned out to be a species everyone had assumed died with the dinosaurs appeared first on Space Daily.