A new measurement of the ground-state hyperfine splitting in antihydrogen shows that it is identical to that of normal hydrogen to within four parts per million – two orders of magnitude more precise than previous experiments. Although the measurement by CERN’s ALPHA collaboration did not reveal any asymmetries between matter and antimatter, the result is nevertheless a milestone in the search for reasons why the universe appears to be made up almost entirely of matter, with only minute amounts of antimatter.

According to the Standard Model of particle physics, all matter particles have a corresponding antimatter particle that is identical to them in every way apart from their charge and magnetic properties, which are reversed. If this model is correct, then the Big Bang that formed our universe nearly 14 billion years ago should have generated equal amounts of antimatter and matter. But in that case, neither we nor almost everything else we observe should exist, because pairs of antimatter and matter particles annihilate each other whenever they collide.

“This apparent lack of antimatter in the universe remains one of the biggest mysteries in modern physics and suggests there is something about antimatter and matter that we do not understand,” says Timothy Friesen of the University of Calgary, Canada, one of the lead authors of a Nature paper on the new measurement.

Measuring antihydrogen

To look for subtle asymmetries that might explain why matter triumphed and antimatter all but disappeared, ALPHA is performing precise measurements on the simplest antimatter atom: antihydrogen, which consists of an antiproton bound to an antielectron, or positron.

These measurements take place at the CERN Antiproton Decelerator Facility using the ALPHA-2 antihydrogen apparatus, which is designed to prevent antihydrogen from coming into contact with normal matter. It does this by confining the antimatter within a cylindrical Penning–Malmberg trap under an extremely high vacuum and surrounded by strong superconducting magnets. These magnets suspend the antimatter in the trap so that it does not touch the walls of the container it is held in, preventing it from annihilating before measurements can take place.

In the latest work, the ALPHA collaboration focused on a parameter known as hyperfine splitting. This splitting occurs because magnetic interactions between the spins of the antiproton and positron cause the positronic ground state in antihydrogen to split into four sublevels, which the researchers label |a⟩, |b⟩, |c⟩ and |d⟩.

In hydrogen, the magnitude of this hyperfine splitting has been measured extremely precisely – we know its value to within a few parts per trillion – and it is particularly sensitive to the structure of the proton. Measuring this splitting in antihydrogen with the same precision would therefore be an excellent way of searching for differences between matter and antimatter. Previously, however, the most sensitive measurements only managed a precision of 400 parts per million (ppm).

In pursuit of precision

To push beyond this level, the ALPHA researchers applied pulses of microwaves at frequencies between 28 GHz and 31 GHz to induce the positron spin flip transitions |c⟩ → |b⟩ and |d⟩ → |a⟩ between the hyperfine levels of ground-state (2S and 1S) antihydrogen atoms. By measuring the frequencies at which these transitions occurred, they could then calculate the hyperfine splitting energy.

“At a magnetic field of 1 Tesla, we measured the hyperfine splitting for antihydrogen to a precision of 4 ppm – a result that has allowed for one of the best comparisons of matter-antimatter symmetry in antihydrogen ever,” Friesen says.

While the new measurement is precise enough to push experiments into a regime that is sensitive to the structure of the antiproton, Friesen notes that it is still five orders of magnitude less precise than comparable measurements in ordinary hydrogen. “The comparisons at this level of precision with matter hydrogen are identical, and our current models of physics therefore still hold,” he says.

The team does have some ideas for further improvements. “To push the measurement to improved precisions we are aiming to induce antiproton spin flip transitions, since these can be less sensitive to magnetic field inhomogeneities, which are our biggest systematic uncertainty,” Friesen explains. “This, combined with laser cooling the antihydrogen samples to reduce the width of our spectroscopic line-shapes, could help improve the precision by at least another factor of 100.”

The post Matter-antimatter symmetry measurement sets new precision record appeared first on Physics World.

The Nobel-prize-winning Belgian theoretical physicist François Englert, whose work led to the discovery of the Higgs boson, died on 18 June at the age of 93.

Englert’s studies, which he carried out in the early 1960s with his colleague Robert Brout, demonstrated that fundamental particles can acquire mass by interacting with a field that permeates the universe. The work set in motion a decades-long hunt for the Higgs boson, which was finally discovered at the CERN particle-physics lab near Geneva in 2012.

For the work, Englert shared half of the 2013 Nobel Prize for Physics together with the British theoretical physicist Peter Higgs, who died in 2024.

Born in Brussels, Belgium, on 6 November 1932, Englert studied electrical engineering at the Free University of Brussels (ULB) before switching to physics and completing a PhD at the university in 1959.

For two years he then worked at Cornell University before returning to ULB in 1961, where he remained for the rest of his career.

New particle

“Spontaneous symmetry breaking” is a well-known concept in condensed-matter physics where it had been used to explain how, for example, unordered regions of a magnetic material could suddenly align themselves in a specific direction.

In the early 1960s, the Japanese–American particle physicist Yoichiro Nambu adapted the phenomenon into quantum field theory.

Working at the ULB, Englert and Brout took inspiration from Nambu’s work and in 1964 the pair proposed that the weak and electromagnetic interactions could be united by spontaneous symmetry breaking.

Higgs, who independently came to the same conclusion as Brout and Englert, showed that the particles that carried the weak force acquired their mass through interactions with an all-pervasive field, now known as the Higgs field with the interactions occurring via the Higgs boson.

In 2012 at CERN’s Large Hadron Collider, physicists working on the LHC’s giant ATLAS and CMS detectors discovered the Higgs boson with a mass of about 125 GeV.

The following year, Englert shared half of the 2013 Nobel Prize in Physics with Higgs “for the theoretical discovery of a mechanism that contributes to our understanding of the origin of mass of subatomic particles, and which recently was confirmed through the discovery of the predicted fundamental particle, by the ATLAS and CMS experiments”.

Brout died in 2011 so was not given the Nobel prize as it is not awarded posthumously.

As well as the Nobel prize, Englert won many other awards including the Francqui Prize, awarded by the Francqui Foundation in 1982, the Wolf Prize in Physics (2004) and the American Physical Society J J Sakurai Prize (2010). In 2013, he was ennobled a baron by King Albert II of Belgium.

Particle physicist John Ellis from King’s College London, who has spent most of his career at CERN, told Physics World that he will remember Englert for his “his modest and polite demeanour, despite his evident and justified pride in his ground-breaking work”.

“His memory lives on as one of the founders of the Standard Model and an originator of one of its greatest puzzles, the Brout-Englert-Higgs mechanism for breaking symmetries and generating particle masses,” adds Ellis. “How long will it be before we understand this remarkable, yet crucial, aspect of Nature?”

The post Belgian Nobel-prize-winning theoretical physicist François Englert dies aged 93 appeared first on Physics World.

The most precise calculation of the muon’s anomalous magnetic moment to date has put to rest the possibility of that property revealing new physics beyond the Standard Model – at least for now. The new result, from an international team of physicists, was obtained using a new method to calculate this anomaly that is based on lattice quantum chromodynamics (QCD).

In the Standard Model (SM) of particle physics, which is currently our best theory of the fundamental forces of nature (barring gravity), the muon is an elementary particle. It belongs to the same family (of quarks and leptons) as the electron, but is more than 200 times heavier. The muon interacts with other SM particles via two of the fundamental forces – electromagnetism and the weak force.

Quarks and leptons all possess a magnetic moment that comes from their intrinsic angular momentum, or spin, and quantum theory posits that this magnetic moment is related to the spin by the “g-factor”. This quantity was originally calculated to be equal to exactly two for both the electron and muon.

Experiments over the last 50 years have detected minute deviations from this number, however. This difference, of roughly 0.1 %, is known as the “anomalous g-factor”, a_µ = (g – 2)/2, and it comes from so-called radiative corrections – the continuous emission and re-absorption of short-lived “virtual particles” by electrons and muons.

Measuring such discrepancies is very important for physicists because the g-factor could point to the existence of other particles – both known and as-yet undiscovered – so hinting at physics beyond the SM. They can do this thanks to the muon. Since this particle is so heavy compared to the electron, the impact of virtual particles acting on it is significantly greater. This enhanced sensitivity means that measuring the muon g−2 is better for searching for new physics than the electron g−2.

Difficult measurements and calculations

The problem is that such calculations are not easy – all the more so because the muon’s magnetic moment also receives contributions from the strong force as well as the electromagnetic and weak interactions (even though the muon does not itself partake in strong interactions). These strong contributions come from the muon interacting with the photon, which in turn interacts with quarks that then themselves interact via the gluon — the mediator of the strong-force.

The strong force (which is responsible for binding quarks into protons, neutrons and other hadrons) is notoriously difficult to integrate into theoretical calculations, however, because it is so strong.

In the new work, the researchers overcame this problem using lattice QCD of the most uncertain theoretical contribution to the muon g−2 – the “leading-order hadronic vacuum polarization” (LO-HVP), which has been traditionally determined using experimental data. Lattice QCD, they explain, is a computational technique that simulates the strong force on supercomputers by dividing space-time into a fine grid or lattice of small cells. The equations of the strong interaction are then solved on this lattice.

To reach the level of precision required to calculate the muon g−2, the researchers improved on their previous lattice calculation using finer grids and also combined it with experimental data in the very long-distance interaction region. This hybrid approach dramatically reduced errors, so allowing for the most precise value of the muon magnetic moment ever.

“Our result together with the other contributions yields a prediction that combines three interactions (the electromagnetic, weak and strong forces), each of which require vastly different theoretical tools, into a single calculation that differs from the recent experimental measurement of a_μ by only 0.5 standard deviations,” says Kalman Szabo of Penn State University in the US, who is a lead researcher on the team. “This provides a notable validation of the Standard Model to 11 digits.”

The original goal in their latest work, he explains, was to have an unambiguous and ab initio pure theoretical work to calculate the magnetic moment of the muon. “When we started, there were very strong signs that there was a tension between experiment and theory in this quantity, which would mean the presence of a new interaction.”

No tension and no new interaction

“Confirming this tension would have been – with some bias from our side – the ‘fundamental discovery of the century’”, he says. “In the end, however, our study shows that there is no tension. Thus, we did not find the new interaction but proved that quantum theory holds with an unprecedented accuracy.”

The result does not mean that new physics has been ruled out, however, he adds. Future experiments and calculations will help clarify the picture, but for now, the Standard Model holds strong.

“We now have a beautiful proof of quantum field theory and this gives credibility to any further work based on this theory,” he tells Physics World. “The accuracy is astonishing, which gives hope to answer other questions related to the strong interaction with similar or even better accuracies.

“Indeed, other groups are now racing to try to validate (or refute) our result, something that can only beneficial for the advance of our field in general.”

The research is described in Nature.

The post Muon g−2 calculation sets precision record and backs the Standard Model appeared first on Physics World.