China has released new footage highlighting tests aboard its Type 076 amphibious assault ship Sichuan, including the vessel’s first publicly disclosed live-fire launch of countermeasures and an electromagnetic catapult test using a dead load.

The Sichuan features a new propulsion system and an electromagnetic catapult designed to support future unmanned operations at sea, marking a step toward expanding China’s naval aviation capabilities beyond traditional carrier-based platforms. 

Military observers noted that the dead load test represents an early-stage evaluation carried out before full aircraft launch trials, helping validate the performance and reliability of the electromagnetic launch system.

Operational readiness with electromagnetic catapult trial

The successful completion of the electromagnetic catapult test during the construction phase of the Type 076 amphibious assault ship suggests that the system has reached an operational and reliable stage, according to military observers. 

The vessel has already completed multiple sea trials, fueling expectations that it could soon enter service. Observers also anticipate the future release of footage showing the ship conducting launches of actual carrier-based aircraft, which would provide further insight into its capabilities, Global Times reported.

Chinese military affairs expert Song Zhongping said the Type 076 amphibious assault ship marks a significant technological advance, introducing new possibilities for naval operations. Speaking to the Global Times on Saturday, he noted that the vessel addresses the challenge of deploying carrier-based aircraft from amphibious assault ships while also driving innovation in future maritime operational concepts.

The Type 076 combines technologies developed for China’s Type 075 amphibious assault ship and Type 003 aircraft carrier, bringing together existing systems to create a more advanced naval platform. According to Song, the integration of these technologies improvaes the ship’s overall capabilities and demonstrates China’s progress in electromagnetic catapult systems and related technologies.

Enabling longer-range drone missions with heavier payloads

The electromagnetic catapult system aboard the Type 076 is expected to expand the range of aircraft the ship can deploy, supporting both manned fighter jets and larger unmanned aircraft. According to Song, the technology could allow drones to operate with heavier payloads and greater endurance, enabling them to carry additional equipment or weapons for longer-range missions.

Launched in December 2024, the Sichuan began its first sea trials in November 2025, according to Xinhua News Agency. The vessel has a full-load displacement of more than 40,000 tons and features a twin-island superstructure, a full-length flight deck, and newly integrated electromagnetic catapult and arrestor systems.

These technologies are designed to improve aircraft launch and recovery capabilities while expanding the operational flexibility of the ship. Furthermore, the vessel is designed as a multi-role naval platform capable of supporting a range of operations, including the deployment of fixed-wing aircraft, helicopters, and amphibious equipment. 

Chinese media note that the ship has successfully completed multiple rounds of sea trials, allowing engineers and naval crews to evaluate its systems, performance, and operational readiness ahead of its expected commissioning.

The United States is moving to expand its domestic drone manufacturing base after Performance Drone Works (PDW) received a conditional loan commitment of up to $820 million from the Department of War’s Office of Strategic Capital (OSC). Rather than focusing solely on producing more drones, the proposed funding aims is address one of the industry’s biggest vulnerabilities: reliance on foreign-controlled supply chains for critical drone components.

If finalized, the financing would help expand U.S. production capacity for propulsion systems, power electronics, flight-control hardware, vision systems, and other key technologies used in drones, robotics, and autonomous platforms.

Building the industrial base behind military drones

Modern military drones are only as resilient as the supply chains that support them. While the United States develops some of the world’s most advanced unmanned systems, many of the electronic components and subsystems that power them continue to come from overseas suppliers.

According to the company, the proposed investment would allow PDW to manufacture many of these critical technologies domestically while also supplying components to other American drone manufacturers. The initiative reflects broader efforts to strengthen the U.S. defense industrial base as demand for unmanned systems continues to grow.

The company currently operates Drone Factory 01, a 90,000-square-foot engineering and manufacturing facility in Huntsville, Alabama, where engineering, systems integration, flight testing, manufacturing, and fulfillment are carried out under one roof.

Lessons from modern warfare

The announcement comes as drones have become one of the defining technologies of modern conflict. From intelligence gathering and precision strikes to logistics and electronic warfare, unmanned systems are now central to military operations across multiple theaters.

Recent conflicts have also exposed the importance of manufacturing capacity. Producing advanced drones at scale requires a reliable supply of motors, batteries, flight controllers, sensors, cameras, communications equipment, and propulsion systems. Many of these have historically depended on international supply chains.

By investing in domestic production of these technologies, the United States aims to reduce potential supply disruptions while improving the ability to rapidly manufacture mission-critical systems when required.

Beyond defense applications

Although the proposed financing is driven by national security priorities, the manufacturing capability could extend beyond military use. PDW said the expanded production capacity is intended to support future public safety, industrial, and commercial applications in addition to meeting defense requirements. A stronger domestic component ecosystem could also benefit the wider U.S. drone industry by providing American-made alternatives for manufacturers that currently rely on imported hardware.

The Office of Strategic Capital was established to help finance technologies considered important to long-term U.S. national security and industrial competitiveness, particularly in areas where private investment alone may not be sufficient to rapidly scale manufacturing.

Funding remains conditional

The proposed $820 million financing has not yet been finalized. According to the announcement, the commitment remains conditional and is subject to additional financial, legal, technical, and due diligence requirements before reaching financial close.

Even so, the size of the proposed investment illustrates how drone manufacturing has become a strategic priority for the United States. As militaries increasingly rely on autonomous systems across air, land, and sea, building secure domestic supply chains for the components behind those platforms is emerging as an important part of maintaining technological and industrial competitiveness.

The Air Force Research Laboratory increased by $11.7 million Blue Origin’s contract to study the use of space rockets for point-to-point deliveries

The post U.S. Air Force expands Blue Origin rocket cargo contract  appeared first on SpaceNews.

Two K2 satellites will host optical terminals intended to connect military systems in orbit

The post Space Force awards K2 Space $22.9 million for laser communications demonstration appeared first on SpaceNews.

HELSINKI — China sent a new pair of secretive satellites into a programmatically new orbit Wednesday, while also upgrading its on-orbit communications relay capabilities. A Long March 6A rocket lifted […]

The post China launches secretive TJS-27 pair, orbits next-gen Tianlian relay sat appeared first on SpaceNews.

There’s data center activism, fought with Facebook groups and petitions, and then there’s data center annihilation, fought with guided missile and suicide drones.

Recently, the Iranian military announced it had hit and damaged two Amazon data centers in the island country of Bahrain with a volley of cruise missiles.

After the attack, the Iranian state media outlet Tasnim published a partial statement from the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps, saying that the “IRGC Aerospace warriors… in response to the aggression and assault… by the child-killing American army on the under-construction and civilian facilities of DarKhoveyn, attacked and destroyed the central data infrastructure of the American company Amazon in Bahrain with several cruise missiles.”

Using images from the European Space Agency’s Sentinel-2 satellites, Bloomberg confirmed an attack on the data center campus had taken place, though noted it’s difficult to say how bad the damage is (Amazon refused to comment on Bloomberg‘s reporting.)

“Analysis of Sentinel-2 images shows evidence of damage to both facilities, but does not provide insight into the extent of the damage,” Adam Farrar, Bloomberg‘s senior geoeconomics analyst said.

Overall, it marks the fourth such attack on a data center since the US began the war in February. Back in March, the IRGC announced a number of US tech companies as “Iran’s new targets,” including Google, Microsoft, Palantir, IBM, Nvidia, and Oracle. Now that the war is heating back up, it seems that they’re becoming targets yet again.

Militarily, it’s a logical move, as US tech companies have been integral to the American war effort. The Pentagon is using a host of AI models to gather intelligence and select military targets for annihilation, most notably the Shajareh Tayyebeh primary school, which was destroyed in a triple-tap strike resulting in the deaths of over 120 school children, as well as parents and teachers.

Perhaps above all, it’s a statement to American president Donald Trump: the longer the hostilities linger, the more economic and technological havoc Iran is willing to unleash on the region.

More on Iran: The US Military Has Been Using Elon Musk’s Grok AI to Bomb Iran

The post Iran Appears to Be Blasting Amazon Data Centers Off the Map appeared first on Futurism.

The Space Force Association’s National Spacepower Center is building an unclassified environment for demonstrating threats to satellites and their consequences on Earth

The post Inside the effort to show Congress what war in space looks like appeared first on SpaceNews.

Vendors will compete for orders to build satellites, sensors and systems for more realistic military space exercises

The post Space Force picks 15 companies for $981 million training range contract appeared first on SpaceNews.

In March 2021, while serving as a senior fellow at the Brookings Institution, I hosted a discussion with General Chance Saltzman, now Chief of Space Operations for the United States […]

The post The new space wars: lessons from Ukraine and the Middle East appeared first on SpaceNews.

CEO says market doesn't reflect value of Pentagon-backed business

The post L3Harris delays missile business IPO to 2027 despite surging defense demand appeared first on SpaceNews.

Falcon 9 will launch satellites supporting missile tracking, targeting and military communications

The post SpaceX wins $1.6 billion in launch orders for military satellite networks appeared first on SpaceNews.

All Points Logistics is the third company selected under a Commercial Solutions Opening to add facilities where satellites can be inspected, tested, fueled and prepared for integration with launch vehicles

The post Space Force awards All Points $250 million to expand satellite processing at Vandenberg appeared first on SpaceNews.

European defense contractor Saft is set to supply lithium-ion battery systems for the next generation of naval submarines, replacing decades-old lead-acid technology with EV-style packs that promise higher energy density, faster charging, and superior underwater endurance.

GE Aerospace and Magellan Aerospace have signed a memorandum of understanding to establish maintenance, repair, and overhaul capabilities in Canada for the F414-GE-39E engine that powers Saab’s JAS 39 Gripen E fighter.

The agreement, announced on July 22, would move forward only if the Canadian government selects the Gripen E for the Royal Canadian Air Force’s fighter fleet.

Under the proposed arrangement, GE Aerospace would train Magellan personnel and license the company as Canada’s domestic center of excellence for F414 engine sustainment. The work would be carried out at Magellan’s facility in Mississauga, Ontario.

Domestic engine support

“Today’s MOU signing builds on a six-decade relationship between GE Aerospace and Magellan that spans both military and commercial engines and will ensure the Royal Canadian Air Force has access to engine sustainment services in country to ensure readiness of the F414 engines,” said Paul Ferraro, Vice President of Defense Engines & Services at GE Aerospace.

The companies said the capability would support aircraft readiness, engine availability, and long-term fleet performance while giving Canada more control over fighter maintenance.

The proposed center would also extend Magellan’s role in military engine support by developing specialized infrastructure, technical expertise, and a skilled workforce within the country.

If implemented, the project would fit with Canada’s push to strengthen its domestic defense industrial base and retain more high-value aerospace work at home.

Sovereign aerospace capability

“This MOU reflects our shared intent to build enduring sovereign aerospace capabilities in Canada,” said Haydn Martin, Magellan’s Vice President in Business Development, Marketing, and Contracts.

“Should the Saab JAS 39 Gripen E aircraft be selected, Magellan Aerospace will be ready to provide world-class engine maintenance, repair and overhaul services that enhance operational readiness for the Royal Canadian Air Force while maintaining highly skilled Canadian jobs, developing advanced technical expertise, and strengthening Canada’s long-term defence industrial capacity,” he said.

For the Royal Canadian Air Force, having an in-country engine sustainment option could reduce dependence on foreign maintenance networks and improve access to repair capacity during periods of higher operational demand.

The planned capability would also support the development and retention of personnel trained to work on fighter propulsion systems.

F414 engine track record

The Gripen E uses the F414-GE-39E, part of GE Aerospace’s F414 engine family. According to GE Aerospace, the F414 has accumulated more than five million flight hours, while more than 1,600 engines have been delivered to eight nations.

The engine features a six-module architecture intended to simplify maintenance and allow components to be replaced or interchanged.

GE Aerospace also says the F414 operates without scheduled overhauls, relying instead on on-condition maintenance designed to maximize engine availability and reduce life-cycle costs.

The engine is built to provide rapid throttle response and unrestricted performance.

However, the Canadian sustainment plan remains tied to Ottawa’s fighter procurement decision. The proposed Mississauga operation would proceed only if Canada chooses the Gripen E, making the MOU both an industrial commitment and a potential element of Saab’s bid for Canada’s future air combat requirements.

The US Army is testing an experimental AI platform designed to dramatically accelerate battlefield planning by reducing decision-making timelines from days or hours to just seconds. The system, known as the Course of Action Generative Pre-trained Transformer (COA-GPT), is intended to help military personnel rapidly develop and adapt operational plans while maintaining human oversight throughout the process.

Developed by researchers at the US Army Combat Capabilities Development Command’s Army Research Laboratory, the Army’s primary fundamental research institution, COA-GPT is being evaluated as part of Project Convergence Capstone 6, the service’s largest experimentation exercise, taking place at Fort Irwin, California. 

The trial will assess how AI can support faster, more adaptable decision-making in future battlefield environments.

Tackling human-AI integration in military operations

The COA-GPT is an experimental AI platform built to speed up mission planning while providing commanders and intelligence teams with a more flexible framework for operational decision-making. 

The system is designed to address one of the military’s biggest challenges in adopting AI: ensuring effective collaboration between soldiers and AI. By combining AI-generated recommendations with human judgment, COA-GPT aims to help military personnel plan and adapt operations more quickly without removing people from the decision-making process.

According to Dr. Amar Marathe, program manager for COA-GPT at DEVCOM Army Research Laboratory, the platform combines generative AI with decades of military expertise and established doctrine to help Army leaders and soldiers generate, compare and evaluate different operational planning options. 

He stressed that the goal is not to replace human decision-makers, but to enhance their capabilities. Instead, COA-GPT is designed to fit into existing military planning workflows, enabling personnel to work faster, improve efficiency and make more informed decisions during mission planning.

Interface helps commanders guide autonomous systems

One of the key scientific challenges behind COA-GPT is enabling machines to better understand human intent across teams of soldiers and AI-enabled systems, according to Marathe. Through a partnership with Hyssos Tech, the platform incorporates an advanced graphical interface that allows leaders at different levels of command to communicate with AI more naturally. 

Using tools such as shared maps and visual inputs, commanders can better guide agentic AI systems while reducing miscommunication, cognitive burden and operational friction among personnel.

Marathe further explained that COA-GPT was developed with a flexible, plug-and-play architecture that allows researchers to replace individual components and experiment with new AI capabilities without rebuilding the entire system. This approach enables faster testing, adaptation and integration of emerging technologies as the platform continues to evolve.

Moving forward, the Army will continue refining the COA-GPT testbed through additional soldier feedback and collaboration with industry partners. Researchers will examine how generative AI could reshape the role of Army planning teams, identify the cognitive skills future planners will need and improve workflows to ensure the technology helps maintain a strategic advantage on the battlefield.

New satellite imagery has been released that appears to show what analysts believe is a new kind of Chinese submarine. Captured by BlackSky back in May of this year, the new attack submarine appears to be under construction at the Jiangnan Shipyard in Shanghai.

Concrete details on it are thin on the ground, but analysts believe it could be an improved version of China’s existing Type 093 “Shang” class. If true, this would represent another step in China’s modernization of its undersea capabilities.

From what can be gathered, the new submarine appears to have a smaller conning tower than the Type 093, and appears to be shorter. The smaller tower could be significant as it could reduce drag and turbulence when submerged.

This would, in turn, reduce its acoustic signature, making it more stealthy. Hull design is also just one part of a vessel’s design. If the idea is to make it more acoustically stealthy, then the submarine would likely also feature other refinements like vibration isolation, anechoic coatings, sonar arrays, etc.

New Chinese submarine spotted

If true, this would make the submarine considerably harder to detect and track using things like passive sonar. For potential rivals in theatres like the Indo-Pacific, it could, in theory, thwart detection efforts from P-8 “Poseidon” aircraft, seabed sensor networks, etc. This would feed into China’s anti-access/area-denial strategy within its sphere of influence.

“Its role may be to silently approach U.S. aircraft carriers underwater and launch attacks,” former Vice Admiral Masao Kobayashi, who served as commander of the Japan Self-Defense Forces’ submarine fleet, told Asahi.

In reality, this translates to making it riskier for Western navies to operate near Taiwan or the South China Sea in general. If this new submarine is as quiet as believed, it could, in theory, stalk and potentially attack U.S. carrier strike groups.

Reduced drag would also translate into higher speeds when submerged, and much improved energy efficiency. That would enable it to travel further and operate for longer between resupply.

According to reports, the submarine appears to be around 393 feet (120 meters) long and 33 feet (10 meters) wide. It would also be just the latest in new submarines developed and launched by China in recent years.

Between 2021 and 2025, Asahi explains, China has deployed an estimated ten submarines, with a total displacement of around 79,000 tons between them. Beyond that, analysts are somewhat split on how to classify the new submarine.

New class or improvement?

Some believe it to be an entirely new class, while others prefer to see it as an improved variant of the Type 093. It is also not clear how the submarine is powered and propelled, with some believing it is likely nuclear-powered. However, it is impossible to tell from satellite imagery alone.

“The submarine appears to be a new class,” Timothy Heath, owner of research firm Perceptum, told the South China Morning Post (SCMP).

Whatever the case, it is important to note that we only have satellite imagery to go by right now. Chinese authorities have neither confirmed nor denied the new submarine’s existence.

Air defense used to revolve around one basic problem: stopping enemy aircraft and missiles before they reached their targets. The rapid spread of drones has complicated that equation.

Cheap one-way attack drones, small reconnaissance UAVs, and larger strike platforms can now threaten military bases, infrastructure, and frontline units without requiring an adversary to risk an expensive crewed aircraft.

Traditional surface-to-air missiles, or SAMs, remain among the most powerful tools available for defending airspace. But using costly missiles against inexpensive drones can create an unfavorable exchange.

That has pushed militaries toward another option: drone interceptors designed specifically to hunt and destroy hostile UAVs. Here is how the two approaches compare across six key areas.

Cost per interception

The biggest difference is economics.

Modern surface-to-air missiles can be extremely expensive because they require sophisticated seekers, propulsion systems, guidance electronics, and warheads capable of destroying fast and highly maneuverable targets.

That makes sense when the incoming threat is a fighter jet, helicopter, or cruise missile. The calculation changes when the target is a relatively inexpensive drone.

Drone interceptors can potentially offer a lower-cost response. Many are built around simpler airframes, compact sensors, and reusable or comparatively inexpensive components. Some destroy targets by collision, while others carry small warheads or other defeat mechanisms.

The objective is simple: avoid spending a high-value interceptor on a low-value threat whenever possible.

Speed and target types

Surface-to-air missiles maintain a major advantage when speed matters.

SAM systems are designed to engage targets traveling at high subsonic, supersonic, and, in some cases, even greater speeds. That makes them suitable for threats such as combat aircraft and cruise missiles, depending on the system.

Drone interceptors generally operate against slower targets. They are particularly suited to small UAVs whose flight speeds and maneuverability allow another drone to pursue them.

Against a fast jet or missile, however, most interceptor drones would struggle to match the speed and engagement envelope of a dedicated SAM.

Range and coverage

SAM systems are built to defend large areas.

Long-range batteries can monitor and engage threats tens or even hundreds of kilometers away, depending on the weapon. This allows defenders to create layered protective bubbles around cities, bases, and strategic infrastructure.

Drone interceptors usually operate over much smaller areas. They may be launched once radars, electro-optical sensors, or other systems detect an incoming UAV.

Their shorter range makes them better suited to local defense rather than wide-area airspace control.

Ammunition and sustainability

Another important difference is how quickly each system can be replenished. A missile launcher carries a limited number of ready-to-fire interceptors. Once those missiles are used, the system must be reloaded, creating potential vulnerability during large or sustained attacks.

Drone interceptors could offer greater flexibility if they can be manufactured cheaply and stored in larger numbers.

That becomes particularly important during swarm attacks, where dozens of drones may arrive within a short period. The challenge is ensuring that interceptor drones can launch, coordinate, identify targets, and engage quickly enough to deal with multiple threats.

Guidance and autonomy

Surface-to-air missiles rely on highly mature guidance systems.

Depending on the weapon, they may use radar guidance, infrared seekers, command guidance, or combinations of several methods. Drone interceptors increasingly depend on autonomy.

Computer vision, artificial intelligence, onboard navigation, and target recognition can allow an interceptor to pursue another drone with limited human involvement.

That could make them useful against large numbers of small targets, but it also places significant importance on reliable detection, identification, communications, and autonomous decision-making.

Complementary weapons, not replacements

Drone interceptors are unlikely to make surface-to-air missiles obsolete. Instead, they are becoming another layer in increasingly complex air-defense networks.

SAMs remain essential when the threat is fast, long-range, heavily armed, or capable of operating at high altitude. Drone interceptors can fill the gap at the lower end of the threat spectrum, particularly against inexpensive UAVs that may not justify the use of an advanced missile.

The future of air defense will therefore probably not come down to choosing between missiles and interceptor drones. It will depend on using the right weapon against the right target.

As aerial threats become cheaper, more numerous, and more diverse, the most effective defenses will likely combine long-range missiles, guns, electronic warfare, directed-energy systems, and interceptor drones into a layered network capable of responding without exhausting its most expensive weapons.

The US Army and Air Force have signed 10-year Intergovernmental Support Agreements with Arizona State University to expand energy services across military installations in the continental United States.

Signed on July 7, the agreements allow installations to request support for utility monitoring, energy assessments, data integration, resilience planning, and workforce development.

The arrangement is intended to help bases strengthen energy resilience, improve infrastructure management, and prepare for operational disruptions.

Expanding access to energy expertise

Under the agreements, Army and Air Force installations can seek a broad range of technical services from Arizona State University.

These include utility metering and billing analysis, energy and water assessments, building automation, distribution network modernization, on-site generation, microgrid development, independent project reviews, energy readiness exercises, and workforce training.

“Intergovernmental Support Agreements give installations an important mechanism to access support services that can improve readiness and resilience,” said Jordan Gillis, assistant secretary of the Army for installations, energy and environment.

“This effort reflects the Army’s continued focus on strengthening infrastructure, improving efficiency and supporting mission requirements across our installations,” he continued.

The US Army said the partnership can also help installations better understand existing utility systems and identify where modernization or efficiency improvements are needed.

Managing aging utility systems

A major focus of the Army agreement is the condition and performance of utility infrastructure at military installations.

“Through this agreement, Arizona State University will provide the monitoring, analysis and technical support needed to help Army installations better understand and manage aging utility systems,” said David Dentino, deputy assistant secretary of the Army for installations, housing and partnerships.

“This partnership is about improving readiness, increasing resilience, reducing costs and ensuring our installations have the reliable infrastructure needed to support the mission,” he continued.

For the Air Force, the agreement similarly creates a route for installations to obtain services linked to infrastructure, energy efficiency, and mission assurance.

“National security requires energy and water surety,” said Nancy J. Balkus, deputy assistant secretary of the Air Force for infrastructure, energy and environment.

“Every one of our installations is not just a base; it is a power projection platform to assure lethality whenever called upon. Without energy and water security, our missions cannot test, launch, sustain or succeed,” he said.

Supporting long-term installation resilience

Intergovernmental Support Agreements allow military installations to obtain support services from eligible state and local government entities.

For the Army and Air Force, the new ASU agreements provide a framework through which bases can request energy-related expertise without creating separate arrangements for every service.

The broader goal is to improve the reliability of installation infrastructure while giving military facilities more options for monitoring, planning, training, and resilience projects.

By covering services ranging from metering and automation to microgrids and energy readiness exercises, the agreements give installations access to tools that can support infrastructure modernization and long-term operational preparedness.

The initiative also aligns with wider efforts to ensure military installations can continue meeting mission requirements as energy systems, infrastructure demands, and operating environments evolve.

US defense contractor Amentum has secured an $85 million contract to support the modernization of critical infrastructure within the US Navy’s Nuclear Propulsion Program (NNPP). 

The three-year agreement will focus on redesigning and upgrading spent fuel examination capabilities at the Naval Reactors Facility in Idaho, a key site responsible for supporting the Navy’s nuclear fleet. The new facility will allow scientists and engineers to analyze used fuel cores, comparing real-world performance data with predictions from advanced design and testing processes. 

The company points out that these efforts will help improve the safety, reliability, and long-term mission capability of the Navy’s nuclear-powered vessels.

Strengthening the Navy’s nuclear fuel evaluation capabilities

According to Mark Whitney, president of Amentum’s energy and environment business, the project reflects the company’s continued focus on providing the engineering expertise and operational support needed to sustain the US Navy’s nuclear-powered fleet. 

By upgrading critical spent fuel examination capabilities, Amentum aims to help the Navy better analyze, optimize, and extend the performance of nuclear fuel cores. The modernization effort is expected to provide engineers and scientists with improved tools and data to support future fleet readiness, safety, and reliability.

Whitney further noted that Amentum’s broader nuclear expertise positions the company to support some of the most complex challenges in the sector. He said the company’s capabilities cover the full nuclear project lifecycle, delivering safe, innovative, and reliable solutions for customers worldwide. 

He also added that Amentum’s integrated global nuclear expertise enables the company to take on demanding projects, including efforts that support the US Navy in maintaining the effectiveness of its nuclear-powered fleet.

Nuclear propulsion program marks decades of innovation and reliability

For more than seven decades, the Navy’s NNPP has remained at the forefront of nuclear technology, developing advanced systems to power the Navy’s global fleet. The program has built a reputation for combining innovation, safety, reliability, and operational efficiency, enabling nuclear-powered vessels to perform critical missions around the world. 

Through continuous research, engineering advancements, and rigorous testing, the NNPP continues to support the long-term performance of the US Navy’s nuclear capabilities, Amentum highlights. A collaboration between the Department of Energy and the Department of the Navy, the NNPP is responsible for overseeing the design, development, and operational support required to sustain the Navy’s nuclear-powered fleet. 

The program plays a central role in maintaining US maritime advantage by ensuring warfighters have access to vessels with exceptional endurance, stealth, responsiveness, and advanced warfighting capabilities. Through its work across the nuclear propulsion lifecycle, the NNPP helps support the reliability of the Navy’s strategic naval assets.

Furthermore, as operator of the world’s largest nuclear-powered fleet, including 11 active aircraft carriers and more than 70 submarines, the Navy relies on programs such as the NNPP and partners like Amentum to support the safety, performance, and long-term sustainability of its nuclear propulsion systems.

The European Union has begun delaying the release of satellite images showing shipping lanes near the Strait of Hormuz by 24 hours. The move comes in response to an earlier US government request and coincides with the Trump administration ramping up the war with Iran once again.

The unusual change in the free and open data policy for Europe’s Copernicus Earth observation program was revealed by Space News, which reviewed a copy of the decision made by the Council of the EU on July 13. The ordered delay applies to images taken by Sentinel-1 and Sentinel-2 satellites and covers the Gulf of Oman region that includes shipping lanes leading to and from the contested Strait of Hormuz.

The US government first requested that the European Union restrict Copernicus satellite imagery on May 26, according to the decision document seen by Space News. That request occurred during a shaky ceasefire period for the war that began on April 8 and ended on July 8, when the US military resumed a broader campaign of military strikes following an announcement by President Donald Trump.

Read full article

Comments