Best practices for measuring the performance and stability of indoor photovoltaic devices

By: Abhisek Chakraborty · Giulia Lucarelli · Vaibhav Singh · Jie Xu · Zeynab Skafi · Diksha Thakur · Francesco Di Giacomo · Gyanendra Shankar · Emanuele Calabrò · Francesca De Rossi · Osbel Almora · Peyman Amiri · Shinji Aramaki · Diego Bagnis · Tomiki Bannai · Christoph J. Brabec · Daniele Braga · Gregory Burwell · Francesca Brunetti · Aldo Di Carlo · Matt Carnie · Luigi Angelo Castriotta · Sergio Castro-Hermosa · Manuela Ciocca · Yong Cui · Janardan Dagar · Bruno Damien · Sergey V. Dayneko · Nutifafa Y. Doumon · Vida Turkovic · Karen Forberich · Marina Freitag · Feng Gao · Giulia Grancini · Zhanglin Guo · Behrang Hamadani · Mike Hayes · Jianhui Hou · Robert L. Z. Hoye · Stéphane Jouin · Marko Jošt · Petri Kärhä · Matthias Kauer · Thomas Kirchartz · George Koutsourakis · Shuuji Kuge · Monica Lira-Cantu · Ian Mathews · Morten Madsen · Matthias Auf der Maur · Tsutomu Miyasaka · David Müller · Shashank Priya · Erin L. Ratcliff · Andrea Reale · Makhsud I. Saidaminov · Frédéric Sauvage · Suraj Soman · Zhenchuan Tian · Marko Topič · Antonio Cabas Vidani · Paola Vivo

18 August 2026 at 01:00

Nature Energy, Published online: 18 August 2026; doi:10.1038/s41560-026-02101-x

A major challenge for indoor photovoltaics is the absence of harmonized testing protocols, standards, and shared performance benchmarks. This Consensus Statement outlines recommended practices for testing and reporting device performance, power, efficiency and stability.

Normal view

Best practices for measuring the performance and stability of indoor photovoltaic devices

Author Correction: Durable all-inorganic perovskite tandem photovoltaics