For decades, astronomers have tried to decipher the source of carbon oxides on Uranus’s largest moons from ground-based telescopes. A recent study has leveraged JWST spectroscopy and laboratory experiments to identify carbon oxides and their origins for Ariel, Umbriel, Titania, and Oberon.

Unknown Origins of Carbon Oxide Enrichment

Forty years ago, the Voyager 2 spacecraft flew past Uranus and its twenty-seven moons, sending back prized portraits of the planet’s large and tidally locked satellites Miranda, Ariel, Umbriel, Titania, and Oberon. These images revealed extensive valleys, smooth plains, deep canyons, and possible icy volcanic (cryovolcanic) activity across the surfaces of the icy moons — the telltale signs of intense geologic activity. While Voyager 2 could take spectacular pictures, the spacecraft was not capable of identifying the molecules and materials making up these active surfaces.

In the decades that followed, astronomers have used ground-based near-infrared spectroscopy of these moons to investigate their chemical compositions. These observations have detected weak carbon dioxide and hints of carbon monoxide ice features on the moons with clear spatial trends across the moons’ surfaces, but the origins of these carbon oxides remain unknown. There are two potential explanations for the presence of these molecules: 1) carbon oxides are native to the Uranus system, present from formation, or 2) they formed via radiolysis, in which charged particles trapped in Uranus’s magnetic field interact with water ice and carbon-bearing molecules on the moons’ surfaces.

Ground-based detections are limited due to contamination from Earth’s atmosphere as well as the overall weakness of the carbon dioxide spectral features, thus space-based near-infrared observations of the Uranian moons are necessary to better constrain the carbon oxides on the satellites. Luckily, JWST’s Near-Infrared Spectrograph (NIRSpec) now offers astronomers unimpeded access the moons’ carbon oxide spectral features.

Chemical Clues from Space and in the Lab

In 2024, a study acquired NIRSpec observations of Uranus’s moon Ariel, revealing prominent carbon dioxide features and confirming the presence of carbon monoxide ice hinted at by ground-based studies. Expanding on these observations to include Umbriel, Titania, and Oberon alongside Ariel, Richard J. Cartwright (Johns Hopkins University) and collaborators obtained JWST NIRSpec spectroscopy of Uranus’s four largest moons in hopes of disentangling the origin story of their carbon oxides.

In addition to the JWST spectra, Cartwright and team performed laboratory experiments measuring the spectral properties of carbon dioxide ice over a range of very low temperatures (tens of kelvin). These experiments provided a better understanding of the spectral properties and nature of carbon dioxide on the surfaces of the Uranian moons. Comparing the JWST spectra with the laboratory spectra, the authors found that Ariel, Umbriel, Titania, and Oberon exhibit a variety of spectral features resulting from carbon dioxide ice, carbon monoxide ice, and other carbon-bearing molecules. The presence of these molecules varies between the leading and trailing hemispheres of the moons, these variations appearing strongest in Ariel and Umbriel. The carbon dioxide and carbon monoxide spectral features are stronger on the trailing hemispheres, decreasing with increasing distance from Uranus for all four moons.

Carbon Oxide Origins

What does this mean for the origins of the carbon oxides on the Uranian moons? Spectral features of carbonate minerals and the widespread presence of carbon dioxide throughout the Uranus system suggest that these compounds exist natively. On the other hand, the concentration of carbon oxide features on the trailing hemispheres supports radiolytic production as these hemispheres are bombarded with more ionizing particles from Uranus’s magnetosphere.

Based on these results, the authors have postulated that both origin scenarios, native presence and radiolysis, are required to fully explain the presence of carbon oxides. Future laboratory studies and JWST observations will continue to reveal the nature and composition of bodies in the Uranus system, furthering our understanding of our solar system siblings.

Citation

“Tracing the Source of Carbon Oxides on the Large Moons of Uranus,” Richard J. Cartwright et al 2026 Planet. Sci. J. 7 199. doi:10.3847/PSJ/ae8818

The post Breaking the Ice: Origins of Carbon Oxides on Uranian Moons appeared first on AAS Nova.

A planned flagship spacecraft to Uranus was aiming to use Jupiter for a gravitational boost to shorten its journey to the outer solar system. Now that the mission’s launch date has been pushed back, it’ll need to find another way to its target.

Redesigning the Route

Uranus and Neptune, the ice giants of our solar system, have been comparatively neglected by humanity’s fleet of interplanetary probes. While all of the other major bodies have been visited by at least an orbiter or even a lander, the most detailed exploration we’ve done of these two planets happened when the Voyager 2 spacecraft went screaming past on its way toward interstellar space.

So it was no surprise when a panel of scientists and engineers charged with setting scientific exploration priorities between 2023 and 2032 recommended finally sending a spacecraft to Uranus, depositing it into orbit around the planet, and keeping it there for a while to collect data. The study itself suggested a basic design for the mission: a pair of spacecraft, one orbiter and one sacrificial atmospheric probe, collectively weighing about 4,000 kg.

Getting these spacecraft to their destination will be a challenge The thriftiest path to get to Uranus, a trajectory called a Hohmann transfer that’s been used for other missions aimed elsewhere in the solar system, would take 16–17 years. Rather than accept the long wait, the original authors suggested that the mission instead fly toward Jupiter, using the giant planet’s massive gravitational tug to slingshot the spacecraft toward Uranus.

However, this plan relied on Jupiter being in just the right place when the spacecraft approached. This in turn relied on the mission launching sometime in 2031 or 2032: any earlier or later, the slingshot would be aimed in the wrong direction. Now that timelines and budgets have slipped for this flagship mission, hitting this launch window seems unlikely. And, without the boost from Jupiter, the mission will have to cross 20 au of open interplanetary space on its own.

Solar Electric Propulsion to the Rescue

Recently, a team led by Amy Simon, NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, took on this challenge and tried to chart a new path through the solar system. The team realized that solar electric propulsion (SEP), a technique that relies on using solar panels to create electricity and accelerate ions to create thrust, might offer a path forward. By using SEP, the mission could leave Earth, unfurl wings of solar panels, then gradually accelerate for as long as there was enough sunlight to power the engine.

The power levels would likely get too low just a few astronomical units into their journey, but that would be enough: after discarding the SEP stage, the mission could coast to Uranus on a journey that would take only 13 years. Even better, this technology has a proven flight history and would require little maturation or development. The BepiColombo mission to Mercury is currently using SEP, and similar techniques are used on satellites in Earth orbit today.

Simon and collaborators also took on a number of other challenges that have cropped up since the mission was proposed, including fewer available plutonium power sources and a re-assessment of Uranus’s rings that revealed hazards in the original flight path. Their work brings the mission closer to the launch pad and illustrates how much iteration goes into the spacecraft that finally takes to the stars.

Citation

“Uranus Orbiter and Probe: Mission Challenges and Concept Updates Since the Origins, Worlds, and Life Decadal Survey,” Amy A. Simon et al 2026 Planet Sci. J. 7 143. doi:10.3847/PSJ/ae680c

The post Who Needs Jupiter? appeared first on AAS Nova.

A new study finds that Uranus' moons almost certainly didn't survive the solar system's violent early chaos intact.