❌

Normal view

New long-clawed British dinosaur is the first of its kind in Europe

The fossilised skull of a new species of mysterious meat-eating dinosaur from the Isle of Wight has been rediscovered in the collections of the Natural History Museum after over 100 years in storage.

Over its nearly 150-year history, this London museum has become home to over 30 million specimens, making it fairly easy to forget about the odd fossil or rock here and there. This is almost definitely what happened to the only known fossil of the UK’s newest dinosaur, a two-legged meat-eating theropod (the dinosaur family including birds) which we have named Invictibellatrix amberina in a new study.

In 2020, Paul Barrett, one of the museum’s palaeontologists, looked through the fossil collections and came across a small chunk of bone which he recognised as an important part of the skull of a dinosaur: the braincase. After going through museum records, he realised the braincase was found on a beach near Sudmoor Point of on the Isle of Wight, an island off the south coast of England known for its world-famous dinosaur fossils. Knowing that it came from the Isle of Wight, Barrett enlisted one of us (Cassius Morrison), a PhD student specialising in dinosaur braincases at the time, to study the fossil in detail and try to figure out which dinosaur it belonged to.

This work showed that the roughly 120 million year old fossil was unlike anything found from the island before and belonged to new species of a mysterious family of carnivores called the Megaraptora.

Megaraptorans are known for their slender skulls, lightly-built skeletons and gigantic hand claws, with some of the larger species having claws over 1 foot long. These ferocious predators are known from across the globe, with most species known from South America, particularly Argentina. Our new British species, Invictibellatrix amberina, was on the smaller side for megaraptorans, about 5 metres from head-to-tail and weighed as much a large tiger, making it the smallest known megaraptoran.

To study the new species, we compared it directly with the skulls of other carnivores. This involved playing a scientific version of spot-the-difference, looking at the subtle differences between species to work out what we were dealing with. We also used computed tomography (CT) scanning, which combines X-rays and computer processing to create detailed images, to look inside the braincase of Invictibellatrix and study what we could of its brain. Putting all of these findings into a computer algorithm to determine where our species sits in the family tree helped us to avoid bias in our interpretations.

Our work suggests that the new species was probably part of the early days of megaraptoran evolution, representing what these animals looked like before they grew to gigantic sizes, similar to their relatives the tyrannosaurs.

Invictibellatrix and its place in the theropod family tree are particularly important, as we now have a better understanding of when and how megaraptorans spread across the world. Before the discovery of Invictibellatrix, megaraptorans were only known from species of the early Cretaceous period (130-120 million years ago) of Thailand and Japan, plus multiple larger species from the late Cretaceous period (85–66 million years ago) of Australia and Argentina.

Warrior of the amber

The great distances between these discoveries means that megaraptorans must have been even more common than their fossils suggest, since there is no way for large animals like these to swim across the oceans that separated these continents during the Cretaceous period.

As the first European megaraptoran, Invictibellatrix provides us with strong evidence that the group probably travelled to the southern continents from Asia, via Europe and Africa. Afterwards they probably spread out across South America and Australia sometime during, or perhaps even before, the early Cretaceous period. The fossil also implies that other megaraptorans may be waiting to be discovered in Africa and even Antarctica.

Invictibellatrix probably lived alongside other carnivores such as Neovenator (a relative of Allosaurus), Ceratosuchops (a relative of Spinosaurus) and Eotyrannus, which as the name implies, was an early relative to the Tyrannosaurus rex. These four dinosaurs were probably eating different animals to each other to survive. The spinosaur specialised in eating fish, with the others eating more land-based prey. Invictibellatrix probably fed on small dinosaurs, mammals, lizards and even crocodiles.

The story of megaraptorans seems to follow the pattern of most of nature’s successes. A small opportunist living in the shadows of much larger animals around the globe only to become the dominant force in a few select ecosystems up to the end of the age of dinosaurs.

It’s this story which gave Invictibellatrix amberina its name, honouring the role of megaraptorans as the apex predators in the late Cretaceous of South America. It translates to “unconquered [female] warrior of the amber”.

Invictibellatrix does not tell us everything. Scientists are still not sure when megaraptorans first evolved, but the fossil does give us some much-needed clues. There is so much left to be discovered about dinosaurs. Sometimes their secrets can be found simply hiding away in museum collections waiting for someone to come and take a closer look.

The Conversation

Cassius Morrison received funding from the Richard Owen Research Grant of the Palaeontographical Society for the study of the new megaraptoran braincase. He is currently a Royal Society Career Development Fellow at the University of Leeds ( funded by the Royal Society).

Charlie Scherer does not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organisation that would benefit from this article, and has disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.

How did Mars get its moons? Japan’s MMX space mission aims to solve the puzzle

Phobos is dominated by Stickney crater, a 9km (5.6 mile) bowl visible on the right. NASA/JPL-Caltech/University of Arizona

The Earth got its Moon when a celestial object collided with our planet more than four billion years ago. This impact hurled molten rock into space, which eventually coalesced to form the satellite we can see every night from across our planet.

But what of our neighbour, Mars? The red planet has two small, irregularly shaped moons called Phobos and Deimos. There are several theories on how these natural satellites formed, but no clear front-runner. Soon, a Japanese-led space mission called Martian Moons Exploration (MMX) will begin its hunt for the answer.

On Monday October 19, MMX is due to lift off on an H3 rocket from Tanegashima Space Center in southern Japan. The mission will aim to land on Phobos and collect a sample of soil. The spacecraft will then send this precious payload to Earth, for study in laboratories.

Asaph Hall
American astronomer Asaph Hall discovered Phobos and Deimos in 1887. Naval History and Heritage Command

Of the two Martian moons, Phobos is the largest and orbits closer to the planet. It has a mean diameter of 22.2km and a mass of 10,637 million million kg. Deimos has a mean diameter of 12.5km and a mass of 1,480 million million kg.

The moons were discovered during a six-day window in 1877 by the American astronomer Asaph Hall, who was working at the US Naval Observatory in Washington DC.

Two main hypotheses dominate discussions of how Mars got these moons. The giant impact theory proposes that a celestial object a third of Mars’ size hit the planet early in its history, ejecting material into space.

The general mechanism is similar to how scientists think Earth’s natural satellite formed. But in the Martian impact theory, a single “giant” moon was created by the ejected material, along with a host of smaller satellites.

Over time, each one broke up and fell to Mars’ surface. Simulations by Pascal Rosenblatt, from the Laboratoire de Planétologie et Géodynamique (LPG) in Nantes, France, and his colleagues show that Phobos and Deimos would have been the sole moons to survive.

Gravitational capture

The other main idea is known as the captured asteroid theory, which goes back to the 1960s. This suggests that Phobos and Deimos were originally asteroids that wandered so close to Mars they were captured by the planet’s gravity.

According to this idea, the moons may have originated from within or just beyond the asteroid belt that lies between Mars and Jupiter. The moons might even have been what’s known as a binary – two asteroids that orbit each other.

The moons are characterised by their low density, which implies they have porous interiors.

Deimos
Deimos, the smaller of Mars’ moons, orbits further from the planet than Phobos. Nasa/JPL-Caltech/University of Arizona

The captured asteroid hypothesis, however, requires an extremely dense Martian atmosphere to explain how the asteroids were trapped by tidal forces. Mars today has a thin atmosphere mainly composed of carbon dioxide. Also, asteroids captured by planets tend to have highly eccentric orbits. The orbits of Phobos and Deimos around Mars are, by contrast, almost circular.

Scientists have also proposed other theories for the origins of these moons, but they command lower levels of support among the scientific community. One visualises the origin of these moons as debris from the destruction of a single “proto-moon”.

Another lesser known idea proposes that Mars undergoes billion-year cycles where rings of rocky material orbiting Mars coalesce over time into moons.

Once the moons are formed, they are eventually ripped apart by gravitational (tidal) forces to form new rings. Under this scenario, we just happen to live in an era where the debris is in the form of moons and not as rings.


Read more: Japan’s MMX mission aims to swipe soil samples from Mars’ moon Phobos


Solving the mystery

Amid this ongoing uncertainty surrounding the moons’ origins, MMX aims to collect more than 10g of material from Phobos – marking the world’s first sample return mission from the Moon.

If the samples contain a large amount of material from Mars itself, along with material from the asteroid that collided with the red planet, then it would favour the giant impact theory. If the composition of Phobos is similar to that of meteorites from known categories of asteroid, it would favour the asteroid capture theory.

MMX’s round trip to Mars will take five years in total. It will arrive at the red planet in late 2027, and return to Earth in 2031.

The spacecraft consists of three modules, one to get to Mars, one to land on Phobos and another to return the sample to Earth. There are 13 scientific instruments, including a gamma-ray and neutron spectrometer for measuring the chemical composition of Phobos, two cameras and a near-infrared instrument for characterising minerals. MMX will also deploy a 25kg rover called Idefix on Phobos’ surface.

For decades, the origin of Mars’s unusual moons has been subject to intense debate. Now, with the launch of this landmark space mission, scientists could be on the verge of a breakthrough.

The Conversation

Lana Williams does not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organisation that would benefit from this article, and has disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.

❌